Chapter 60 Surgical Management of Spinal Dysraphism
The term “spinal dysraphism” describes many different forms of congenital malformations of the neural tube.∗ Table 60-1 classifies dysraphic malformations according to accepted theories of embryogenesis and conveniently divides most of them into primary and secondary neurulation lesions, plus an additional class of preneurulation malformations whose basic error of embryogenesis probably occurred before primary neurulation. The surgical repair of these malformations varies as widely as their morbid anatomy. The “surgical” classification in Table 60-2 therefore has less to do with embryogenesis, structural characteristics, neurology, or region of involvement within the neuraxis, than with whether the lesion is “open” or “closed” in its external boundary, a factor that strongly influences the timing and urgency of surgery. A transitional class incorporates lesions that may have “limited” exposure to the outside, although their main features are mostly enclosed. Each class consists of malformations that have radically dissimilar features. The difference in surgical techniques necessitates individual description under the appropriate lesion heading.
Primary Neurulation Malformations |
Open neural tube defect, terminal and segmental |
Spinal cord lipomas (dorsal and transitional) |
Limited dorsal myeloschisis (LDM) |
Dermal sinus tract (cyst) |
Secondary Neurulation Malformation |
Caudal agenesis (caudal cell mass abnormalities) |
Thickened or fatty filum |
Spinal cord lipomas (terminal, chaotic?) |
Terminal myelocystocele |
Retained medullary cord |
Malformation of Gastrulation |
Split cord malformations, types I and II |
Open Dysraphism |
Open neural tube defect with terminal neural placode |
Open neural tube defect with segmental neural placode |
Closed Dysraphism |
Spinal cord lipomas |
Dorsal |
Transitional |
Chaotic |
Terminal |
Thickened filum |
Split cord malformations, types I and II |
Caudal agenesis and associated caudal spinal cord malformations |
Terminal myelocystocele |
Retained medullary cord |
Transitional Forms of Dysraphism |
Limited dorsal myeloschisis |
Dermal sinus tract (cyst) |
Open Spinal Dysraphism
Embryology and Morbid Anatomy
Normal development of the spinal cord begins around postovulatory day (POD) 22 to 23, when the neural groove deepens and the neural folds meet in the dorsal midline to form the primary neural tube (eFigs. 60-1 and 60-2).∗ The dorsal midline fusion of the neural folds proceeds in a “zipper-fashion” both caudally and rostrally beginning near the sixth cervical somite. This phase of development, called primary neurulation, ends with the formation of the lower lumbar cord segments opposite somites 30/31 around POD 28. As the primitive streak shortens to almost nothing with elongation of the primary neural tube, the caudal cell mass, a cluster of pluripotent primitive stem cells appearing around POD 27 to 28 (O’Rahilly and Muller’s stage 12),2 begins forming (among other caudal embryonic tissues) a solid cord of future neural cells called the medullary cord.2 This connects with the primary neural tube, and then undergoes central vacuolization (cavitation) to form a secondary neural canal. This second phase of development, called secondary neurulation, culminates in the conus from somites 30/31 downward. A final process of degeneration involving extensive apoptosis of the coccygeal segments of the medullary cord occurs resulting in the filum terminalis.3–5
Most ONTDs contain a terminal neural placode with no recognizable neural tube caudal to the flattened neural plate.6 It appears that in most cases, the complete failure of dorsal folding and fusion of the primary neural plate inhibits secondary neurulation so that no conus is formed and the placode ends abruptly. In some cases, remains of an abnormal secondary medullary cord can be found in the form of a filum-like band attached to the lower margin of the neural placode. The dorsal surface of the terminal placode corresponds to what would have been the ependymal lining of the cord if neurulation had taken place, and its ventral surface corresponds to the outer surface of the “would-be” neural tube. The sensory and motor roots from the neural placode therefore project from its ventral surface only, the more lateral sensory roots issuing from the alar plates and the medial motor roots from the basal plates. The cutaneous ectoderm from each side of the embryo normally destined to fuse in the midline is kept widely apart by the unneurulated placode. The dorsal surface of the placode is therefore either “naked,” or covered by an epithelial membrane of variable thickness grown in from the surrounding pia-arachnoid layer (eFig. 60-3A). The placode also effectively prevents dorsomedial migration of the mesenchyme, and thus the completion of the posterior neural arch (hence the term spina bifida), dorsal paraspinous muscles, and lumbodorsal fascia.
Because the meninges develop adjacent to the basal surface of the neuroepithelium, only the ventral (basal) surface of the unneurulated placode receives meningeal investment.7,8 As CSF accumulates between the ventral surface of the placode and underlying leptomeninges, the flat placode is subjected to increasing dorsally directed forces and, lacking dorsal integumentary and myofascial support, is ultimately pushed out dorsally to ride on the dome of the distended cyst (eFig. 60-3B). The remaining dorsal wall of the sac on each side of the placode is composed of leptomeninges that were also ballooned out by the CSF and stretched between the lateral edge of the placode and the margin of abnormal skin. Intact dura lines the ventral portion of the sac, being also prevented from dorsal midline fusion and instead fuses with the margin of the unclosed skin, dorsal musculature, fascia, and periosteum of the incomplete neural arch on both sides of the myelomeningocele sac.8
Preparation for Surgery
The goals of surgical management of ONTD are (1) preservation of functional neural tissues, (2) reconstruction of the dural tube, (3) securing sound myofascial and skin closure, and (4) minimizing the chances of future retethering of the cord. Most open lesions are closed within 24 hours after birth. If the child is initially unstable, closure may be safely delayed for up to 72 hours without an increase in complications. Performing surgery after that time carries a substantial risk of meningitis, wound abscess,9,10 and neurologic deterioration.
Surgical Technique
Opening the Sac
Magnification is used from the very beginning. The sac is entered through the diaphanous leptomeningeal membrane halfway between the margin of healthy skin and the edge of the placode (eFig. 60-4). Neural tissue of the placode is recognizable by its pink, felty surface, transverse wrinkles, and a straight, longitudinal median raphe (Fig. 60-1A) and since the epithelialized membrane itself is relatively avascular, any substantial bleeding from the cut edges signifies breaching of the neural tissue (Fig. 60-1B). Bleeding is controlled with a pair of ultrafine irrigating bipolar cautery forceps. After the initial gush of CSF and collapse of the cyst, the edge of the neural placode is gently flipped up to identify the ventral nerve roots. Several crossing blood vessels may have to be coagulated to free the placode margins. The pearly epithelium must be meticulously trimmed circumferentially from the placode to avoid later occurrence of inclusion dermoid cyst. At the caudal extreme of a terminal placode, the epithelial membrane may remain thin, or one may encounter a band-like thickening probably representing remnant of the medullary cord that must be divided to free the tip. At the rostral extreme of the placode, careful incision of the epithelium–neural tissue junction on both sides exposes the delicate bevel-shaped transition between the neurulated cylindrical spinal cord and the un-neurulated, flat placode (eFig. 60-5). At the apex of the bevel, the central canal of the normal cord can be seen unfurling into the median raphe of the placode, from which CSF sometimes slowly oozes.
Handling the Neural Placode
The neural placode is always handled gently with jeweler’s micro-forceps. If the placode is pliable and thin enough, it is rolled on itself and sewn up with 8-0 nylon sutures through the delicate pial edges (eFig. 60-6). There is no evidence that this improves neurologic function, but it reduces the “sticky” surface from a flat plate to a seam and theoretically lessens the chances of later tethering. If the placode is too thick or too stiff, it should not be forced to roll up for fear of strangulation. Also, tugging too hard on the proximal spinal cord will cause ascension of the neurologic level. In addition, the caudal end of the placode must be checked for the presence of a neurulated cord in the rare case of a segmental placode (see below).
Dural Closure
The margins of the dural flaps are created by sharply incising the ventral dura from the lumbosacral fascia and periosteum (Fig. 60-1C and eFig 60-7; see also eFig. 60-4A and B), and a new dural tube is reconstructed in the midline (Fig. 60-1D). One aims to obtain as capacious a dural sac as possible commensurate with the size of the placode, the theory being if the placode passively flops freely within a large CSF space, it is less likely to adhere to the dorsal dura. This is almost always achievable with the patient’s own dura, even if some of the periosteum overlying the bifid neural arches have to be mobilized with the dura proper to enlarge the sac. In the rare event of insufficient dura, bovine pericardium can be used as a graft because its texture is compatible with newborn dura and because it seldom has suture-hole leakage of CSF. At the end of closure, the suture line is tested with a Valsalva maneuver held at a pressure of 30 to 35 cm of H2O for 10 seconds.
Skin and Myofascial Closure
The true size of the skin defect is only apparent after completely excising the epithelialized membrane back to full thickness skin. Defects up to 5 or 6 cm diameter can usually be closed primarily after the subcutaneous layer is mobilized a short distance centrifugally, just enough to reduce the tension on the skin edges. The subdermal layer is closed with interrupted absorbable sutures, and the skin with fine nylon sutures. A number of surgical techniques have been developed to minimize suture line tension in large defects. Lateral relaxing incisions with bipedicle flap closure in the midline have been effective,11 but the relaxing incisions themselves then require skin grafting at the same time or at a later date. Complex multiple rotation skin flaps have also been tried, but this necessitates extensive skin undermining and still does not altogether eliminate all tension spots. For impossibly large defects, I favor using composite skin–muscle (myocutaneous) flaps. There are three advantages to this technique. Cadaver vaso-latex studies show that a rich vascular anastomosis exists in the skin overlying the gluteus maximus and the latissimus dorsi muscles on each side and across the midline; the muscles themselves are supplied by the gluteal and thoracodorsal arteries, respectively. As long as these arterial pedicles are preserved, blood supply to the lumbosacral skin is well maintained when the four muscles are apposed in the midline, even if the short paraspinous arterial perforators deep to the muscle are taken.12 Secondly, because there is no undermining of the subcutaneous tissues, the skin tension is mostly absorbed by the muscle closure. Finally, this method results in a triple-layered (muscle, subcutaneous tissue, and skin) closure with extra insurance against CSF leak. The flaps survival rate even for enormous defects is greater than 92% with this technique, and the blood loss and extra anesthetic time are quite acceptable.12
Postoperative Management
Early Complications (First Postoperative Week)
The operative mortality for children undergoing repair of an ONTD should be close to 0.13–15 The most common cause of postoperative death is related to hindbrain dysfunction (73%),10,16 but this seldom occurs acutely in the first week of life. Most of the immediate complications pertain to the wound itself.
Wound Dehiscence
A study of the nutritional status of newborn infants who have had myelomeningocele surgery using body weight, nitrogen balance, serum protein, and total lymphocyte count as parameters, showed that these neonates undergo an initial period of severe catabolic changes that do not readjust themselves for as long as 1 month after surgery. This nonspecific catabolic response is caused by rises in circulating levels of ACTH, cortisol, thyroxin, growth hormone, and antidiuretic hormone, stimulated by the extreme stress of surgery, general anesthesia, and blood transfusion.8 During this period, the resistance to infection is lowered, and all anabolic processes, including wound healing, are temporarily slowed. This metabolically unstable time also coincides with feeding difficulties caused by hydrocephalus, postoperative ileus, neurogenic dysphagia (due to brainstem compression), and prematurity. It is no surprise that wound dehiscence is the single most common complication during the first postoperative week.8
Sloughing of only the epidermis in small areas requires only simple dressing changes because the wound eventually epithelializes over the underlying dermal and subdermal layers. Skin grafting is unnecessary. If the skin necrosis is full thickness but there is healthy muscle underneath, the wound edges should be carefully debrided back to bleeding skin. It may then be dressed for second intention healing from below, but this will take some time and delay CSF shunting. A faster way would be partial-thickness skin grafting, which should take well over a well vascularized bed. If full thickness necrosis exposes the dural tube, some measure of immediate coverage must be instituted to prevent desiccation and meningitis. This usually means a more radical and extensive flap rotation or even pediculated full thickness skin flap grafting.17
Finally, parenteral or enteral hyperalimentation should be set up to ensure adequate nutrition.
Wound Infection
Considering how badly the exposed neural placode is contaminated during and shortly after birth, it is surprising how rarely wound (extradural) infections occur after closure of an ONTD. The wound infection rate is about 1.5% to 2.5%, which is only moderately higher than clean neurosurgical procedures.8 However, if one counts the intradural infections, the infection rate rises to 7% to 10% even for early closure.15,18
Systemic signs of sepsis due to gram-negative meningitis are usually present 1 to 3 days after closure. In neonates, these early signs tend to be nonspecific, such as poor feeding, lethargy, or an ashen complexion. It is more common to see hypothermia than pyrexia, and the systemic white blood cell count often drops below 4000/mm.3 If the dural sac is well invested with a myocutaneous coverage, an intradural abscess may eventually form without any external signs. It is important to obtain CSF for culture from a ventricular tap if there is clinical suspicion of sepsis, for the long-term prognosis of gram-negative ventriculitis in the newborn depends almost solely on the promptness of diagnosis and treatment.
ONTD with Segmental Placode
The term segmental placode describes a portion of open neural plate bounded both rostrally and caudally by perfectly neurulated spinal cord (eFig. 60-8). It is found in approximately 4% of all open neural tube defects. The exact mechanism of its genesis is unknown, but somehow it must involve a “square-pulse” type teratogenic insult to the process of primary neurulation; that is, normal neurulation resumes post facto to an isolated failure of neural plate fusion, both in space and time. Or, it could be a manifestation of “collision site” failure from two adjacent neurulation sites proceeding in opposite directions, although no proof of the multisite closure hypothesis yet exists.19 The most common site for the segmental placode seems to be midthoracic to thoracolumbar. It is unclear why the teratogenic insult in these cases, unlike in terminal placodes, does not disrupt secondary neurulation, and allows for normal closure of the posterior neuropore and formation of the conus.
It is important to recognize the placode as segmental before surgical closure because the surgeon should be mentally prepared to handle the distal end of the placode delicately. One reliable clinical clue is the preservation of distal lower extremity movements while the open defect is located high up in the thoracic region. A preoperative MR should be obtained, not only to visualize the distal spinal cord beyond the placode, but to spot other associated paradysraphic malformations such as a split cord malformation (SCM),20,21 a lipoma,22 or a thickened filum. It is even possible the segmental placode represents a hemimyelomeningocele in that the other hemicord of the SCM is fully neurulated and stays uninvolved in the open defect itself.23,24
The technique of closure of the segmental placode is the same as for the terminal one. Every bit of neural tissue must be preserved during trimming of the extraneural membrane, and every effort should be made to reconstruct the tube (eFig. 60-9). The critical decision is whether to deal with the other associated malformation at the same time or at a later date. I recommend the latter since one wants to inflict as little stress to the newborn infant as possible and the immediate goals of infection prevention and neural conservation have been met by the mere closure of the open sac. The definitive procedure of “complete” untethering usually involves more extensive bone and soft tissue dissection, and should be left till 2 to 3 months later when the infant can better withstand a longer anesthesia and larger blood loss, when hydrocephalus is no longer an issue, and after thorough neuroimaging studies have been obtained.
ONTD and Kyphectomy
The apex of the kyphus is resected through the intervertebral discs with the monopolar cautery. The extent of resection must take into account the feasibility of apposing the remaining ends of the spine to fill the gap. The two ends of the stump are then cleared of cartilaginous endplates, and brought together using two parallel wires forced through the bony part of the vertebral bodies with sharp cutting needles. A certain amount of downward pressure must be exerted on the bodies during the apposition and twisting of the wires. During twisting of the wires, the fusion surfaces and the wire loops are subjected to tremendous distracting and persistent dorsal-pointing stresses. The wires should never pass through any cartilaginous part of the body or the intervertebral disc. The infant is immediately immobilized in a fitted thermoplastic body brace for a minimum of 3 months and up to 2 years. Nonunion is a serious problem because discarding one or two crumbled and defunct vertebral bodies essentially means widening the gap even more and an even greater stress for the new construct.8,25
Spinal Cord Lipomas
We advocate strongly for total resection of spinal cord lipomas and radical reconstruction of the neural placode over partial resection because aggressive surgery, contrary to traditional view, is safe and gives far better long-term progression-free survival.26 The rationale for total lipoma resection is based on three hypotheses: (1) the high rate of symptomatic recurrence after partial resection is due to retethering; (2) retethering is promoted by three factors: a tight content-container relationship between spinal cord and dural sac, a large “sticky” raw surface of residual fat, and incomplete detachment of the terminal neural placode from residual lipoma; and (3) total resection can eliminate the factors conducive to retethering and thus reduces the probability of symptomatic recurrence.
The object of surgery is therefore to create conditions that will minimize retethering. The first condition relates to the fact that the normal spinal cord exhibits intradural motions to gravity and postural changes on ultrasonography and dynamic imaging.27,28 Reducing the content-container ratio and amplifying the degree of freedom of the cord within the dural sac must lessen resticking by limiting sustained contact between cord and dura, this sustained contact being intuitively a necessary condition preceding the formation of fibrous adhesions. To do this, the cord bulk must be drastically reduced. For large rambling “virgin” lipomas, this means resection of all or most of the fat down to the thin, supple neural placode. For redo lipomas, the hard, grasping cicatrix must also be removed. The aim is to render the thinnest, most pliant neural placode possible that can be atraumatically neurulated without distortion or strangulation to form a slender, round tube. The raw, sticky lipoma bed is simultaneously concealed within the tube and the sac is enlarged by a capacious dural graft. Finally, total resection also enhances the chances of terminal untethering.
Anatomy and Classification
In the literature, the nomenclature of spinal cord lipoma is imprecise and inconsistent. Here, we are defining the types of lipomas as follows, based loosely on Chapman’s original classification.29
Dorsal Lipoma
The lipoma–cord interface is entirely on the dorsal surface of the lumbar spinal cord, sparing the distal conus (Fig. 60-2A). The junctional demarcation between lipoma, cord, and pia, the fusion line, can always be traced neatly along a roughly oval track, separating fat from the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) and dorsal nerve roots laterally (Fig. 60-2B and eFig 60-10). The lipoma therefore never contains nerve roots. The lipomatous stalk runs through an equally discrete dorsal dural defect to blend with extradural fat. The uninvolved conus often ends in a thickened filum terminale.
Transitional Lipoma
The rostral portion of this type is identical to that of a dorsal lipoma, with a discrete fusion line and easily identifiable DREZ and dorsal roots. Unlike the dorsal type, however, which always spares the conus, the transitional lipoma then plunges caudally to involve the conus as the plane of the fusion line cuts ventrally and obliquely towards the tip of the conus likened to making a slanting, beveled cut on a stick (Fig. 60-2C). The lipoma–cord interface thus created may be undulating and tilted so that the neural placode is rotated to one side or even spun into a parasagittal edge-on orientation, but the neural tissue is always ventral to it and the DREZ and the nerve roots are predictably localizable lateral and ventral to the fusion line and therefore do not course through the fat (Fig. 60-2D). There may or may not be a discrete filum. The dorsal dural defect extends to the caudal end of the thecal sac and may be much larger on the biased side.
Terminal Lipoma
Unlike the dorsal and transitional types, terminal lipomas insert into the caudal extremity of the conus without blending with the spinal cord or its root entry zones. All the sacral roots unmistakably leave the conus rostral to the lipoma, and in most cases the conus itself looks normal. The dural sac and the dorsal myofascial coverings are intact. The lipoma either replaces the filum entirely, or is separated from the conus tip by a short, thickened filum (Fig. 60-3A and B).
Chaotic Lipoma
This previously undescribed type is so named because it does not “follow the rules” of either the dorsal, transitional, or terminal lipoma. It begins dorsally in an orderly fashion as in a dorsal or transitional lipoma, but its caudal portion is ventral to the neural placode and does engulf neural tissue and nerve roots (eFig. 60-11). The fusion line may be distinct rostrally but quickly becomes blurred distally, and the location of the DREZ and nerve roots is less predictable. The moniker “chaotic” depicts the sometimes confusing blend of the ventral fat and neural placode, and the often impossible task of separating fat from neural tissue at surgery (Fig. 60-3C). Chaotic lipomas are uncommon but are characteristically seen with sacral agenesis.
The literature30,31 describes one other lipoma type, the lipomyelomeningocele, in which part of the distal conus extends into the extraspinal compartment, dragging with it a small collar of dural sac (Fig. 60-3D). The basic structure is either that of a transitional or a dorsal lipoma. Accordingly, we choose to classify this type as either a transitional or dorsal lipoma with a descriptive qualifier of “extraspinal extension.”
Surgically Relevant Embryology
Embryogenesis of Dorsal and Transitional Lipomas
In the embryo, a progressive disparity exists between the spinal cord and vertebral column as a result of the faster growth rate of the latter.32–35 The caudal end of the cord ascends gradually from opposite the coccyx in the 30-mm human embryo to the L1–L2 level at birth.34–37 Proper ascent of the cord requires a well-formed neural tube and a smooth pia-arachnoid covering. If during early development a dorsal defect exists in the dura (duraschisis) and neural tube (myeloschisis), mesodermal elements from the surrounding mesenchyme will enter the dural sac and form attachment with the sliding neural tube in the form of a fibro-fatty stalk, resulting in its entrapment. This theory features a fundamental defect in neural tube closure during primary neurulation (secondary neurulation does not involve dorsal neural fold closure), and thus applies only to the dorsal and transitional lipomas (see below). It is compatible with the observation that these two types of lipomas are always associated with neural arch defects.
The embryologic error leading to the mesodermal invasion of the neural tube probably lies in premature disjunction between the cutaneous and neural ectoderms38–40; that is, the separation of one from the other occurs before the converging neural folds fuse with each other. This allows the paraxial mesenchyme to roll over the still gaping neural folds and enter the central canal. Once contact between mesenchyme and ependymal neuroectoderm is made, further closure of the neural tube is permanently prevented and a segmental dorsal myeloschisis is created (eFig. 60-12A and B). Alternatively, the fault may lie in a delay in neural folds fusion secondary to an insufficiency of the paraxial mesoderm in impelling their dorsal convergence,41–47 so that ectodermal disjunction again precedes neural folds fusion. Lastly, faulty fusion of the neural folds due to metabolic disturbance of the cell membrane-bound glycosaminoglycans, which are vital to cell–cell recognition and adhesion,48–51 could likewise reverse the temporal relationship between disjunction and neural folds fusion.
Experimental studies show that the pluripotent mesenchyme forms derivatives according to the inductive properties of the adjacent neuroectoderm (eFig. 60-12C).6,9 The ependymal side of the neural tube induces mesenchyme to form fat, muscles, collagen, and occasionally bone and cartilage, whereas the outer surface of the neural tube induces the formation of meninges.52 However, no dura can now form over the dorsal opened portion of the neural tube, and the dural defect neatly surrounds the evolving lipomatous stalk, which tethers the neural tube to the subcutaneous adiposity. In like manner, deficiencies in the overlying myofascial layers (from myotomal mesoderm) and neural arches (from scleromesoderm) also neatly surround the lipomatous stalk (eFig. 60-12D).
Within the neural tube, the intramedullary fat and muscles fuse with the developing alar and basal plates. Since the dorsal root ganglions develop from neural crest cells at the outer aspect of the neural fold lateral to the site of failed fusion, the dorsal nerve roots grow outward ventrolateral to, but never traverse, the lipomatous stalk. The DREZ must correspondingly lie very near, but always lateral to, the exact junctional boundary between lipoma and spinal cord. This boundary, called fusion line, is of tremendous surgical significance22,53,54 (eFig. 60-12D). Meanwhile, the cutaneous ectoderm, long detached from the neuroectoderm, heals over in the dorsal midline to form wholesome skin over the subcutaneous lipoma.
The genesis of a dorsal lipoma perfectly exemplifies mistimed disjunction during primary neurulation. Its fibro-fatty stalk always involves cord segments above the conus, which mainly forms from secondary neurulation. Furthermore, failure of primary neural tube closure appears to be segmental, normal closure takes place “business-as-usual” immediately following the abnormal event. This “square pulse” nature is illustrated by the fact that the sharp fusion line between fat, spinal cord, and pia-arachnoid can be neatly traced circumferentially around the lipomatous stalk53–55 (see Fig. 60-2B and eFig. 60-10). Dorsal lipomas therefore result from a segmental closure abnormality involving only primary neurulation. They are found in less than 15% of spinal cord lipomas in our series.22,26
In transitional lipoma, the myeloschisis involves much more than an isolated segment of the primary neural tube. Even though its rostral part resembles the dorsal lipoma, the involvement of the whole of the caudal spinal cord means that not only primary but also secondary neurulation have been profoundly disturbed by the mesodermal invasion. This is supported by the observations that in many transitional lipomas the filum is incorporated into the distal fat, and within the lipomas are often spaces resembling the vacuoles within the secondary neural tube. Also, while the rostral part of the transitional lipoma is always dorsal and aptly reflects premature disjunction of primary neurulation, the distal part sometimes involves both the dorsal and ventral aspects of the conus, a situation compatible with misguided mesenchymal inclusion during the much less orderly events of secondary neurulation. Intramedullary mesenchyme may migrate within the neural tube after invasion and travel caudally across the boundary from the primary to the secondary neural canal, since the two neural canals are in continuity.56 In fact, the hypothesis that the rostral part of the transitional lipoma arises from aberrant primary neurulation (involving only the dorsal cord) and the caudal lipoma arises from abnormal condensation of the secondary neural cord (affecting more ventral aspects of the conus) furnishes at least one explanation for the dorsoventral obliquity of the lipoma–cord interface.
Embryogenesis of Chaotic Lipomas
This degree of anatomic unpredictability in chaotic lipoma and its strong association with caudal agenesis (82% in our series22) suggest that the embryogenetic error occurs during the early stage of secondary neurulation as part of the general failure of the caudal cell mass (eFig. 60-13).57,58 Secondary neurulation comprises three distinct stages: (1) condensation of neural material from the caudal cell mass to form the solid medullary cord, (2) intrachordal cavitation of the medullary cord56,58,59 and its integration with the primary neural tube, and (3) partial degeneration of the cavitary medullary cord through massive apoptosis to result in the thin filum terminale.34,56 It is possible that formation of the chaotic lipoma involves the entanglement of lipogenic mesenchymal stem cells with cells from the caudal cell mass during aberrant condensation of the medullary cord, forming an inseparable mixture of neural tissue and fat, with nerve roots projecting out haphazardly.22
Embryogenesis of Terminal Lipoma
Terminal lipomas result from abnormal secondary rather than primary neurulation, as evidenced by the unexcepted rule that the lumbar and upper sacral cord segments, products of primary neurulation, are never affected in a terminal lipoma. Furthermore, dorsal myeloschisis and duraschisis, both hallmarks of failed (primary) neural fold fusion, are never seen. Lastly, the terminal lipoma either replaces or forms part of a thickened filum, which temporally places the pathogenetic process at secondary neurulation. The fact that the distal conus in terminal lipomas always remains fat-free argues against an abnormal condensation phase during early secondary neurulation. On the other hand, the terminal lipoma often contains (disorganized) spinal cord elements and ependymal tubules,60,61 which suggests rather an incomplete or ineffective degeneration phase at late secondary neurulation.
Intraoperative Electrophysicologic Monitoring
Intraoperative monitoring has become sine qua non in lipoma surgery.22,62,63 Electromyography (EMG) is routinely used to accurately identify the motor roots and to detect functional spinal cord within ambiguous tissues. The muscles commonly employed are sartorius (L1), rectus femoris (L2, L3), anterior tibialis (L4, L5), extensor hallucis longus (L5), gastrocnemius (S1), and abductor hallucis (S2). Half-inch long, 25- to 27-gauge–needle recording electrodes and input gains of 50 to 80 microvolts are selected to enable maximum capturing of far-field evoked action potentials of the indexed muscle without undue artifacts. Smaller needle electrodes are inserted directly through the anal verge to record activities of the external anal sphincter (S2-S4). All stimulations and recordings in our cases are done with the Cadwell Cascade Intraoperative Monitoring System (Cadwell Laboratories, Kennewick, WA) using the Cascade Software Version 2.0.
For nerve root and direct spinal cord stimulation, we use a concentric coaxial bipolar microprobe (Kartush Concentric Bipolar, Medtronic Xomed, www.xomed.com) (Fig. 60-4) capable of generating extremely focused and confined current spread at its 1.75-mm tip, and is thus best suited in precise localization of small functioning neuron-axonal units. Larger double-pronged bipolar electrodes, or worse, monopolar electrode, which in essence converts the spinal cord into a giant volume conductor, are undesirable because they cause unwanted recruitment of adjacent depolarizable tissues. Stimulating currents from 0.5 to 3.0 milliamperes are used depending on target impedance. The stimulation frequency is usually set at 10 per second. This allows spontaneous random firing due to nerve irritation from surgical manipulation to be distinguishable from the rhythmic evoked contractions.
Surgical Technique of Total/Near-Total Resection
Step 2. Detachment of Lipoma from Dura
The dura rostral to the lipoma is opened in the midline. For dorsal lipoma, the dural incision is carried circumferentially around the discrete lipoma stalk and then down the middle again to expose the conus (eFig. 60-10