Surgical Management of Aneurysms of the Vertebral and Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Complex

Published on 13/03/2015 by admin

Last modified 13/03/2015

Print this page

This article have been viewed 5633 times

Chapter 78 Surgical Management of Aneurysms of the Vertebral and Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Complex

Helmut Bertalanffy, Ludwig Benes, Stefan Heinze, Wuttipong Tirakotai, Ulrich Sure

Aneurysms of the vertebral artery–posterior inferior cerebellar artery (VA-PICA) complex originate from any portion of the intradural VA up to the vertebrobasilar junction and from one of the five PICA segments. During the past decade, the treatment of these aneurysms became more sophisticated due to significant developments in diagnostic methods, improvements in microsurgical technique, further development of skull base surgery, better understanding of the microsurgical anatomy of the vertebrobasilar arterial territory, and dramatic advances in endovascular therapy. However, despite such continuous improvements, management of these complex lesions remains a challenging task. Several characteristic features distinguish VA and VA-PICA aneurysms from those of the anterior circulation: (1) they are relatively uncommon, occurring approximately one tenth as frequently as aneurysms in the anterior circulation ¹; (2) they show great variability in size, location, and morphology; the percentage of dissecting and fusiform aneurysms is much higher than in the other intracranial compartments; and (3) most of them are located deeply in the posterior fossa having a close relationship to the lower brain stem, the lower cranial nerves, and the cerebellum, making them difficult to access. The anatomic variability of the VA, the PICA, and the skull base around the jugular tubercle add further to the complexity of these lesions and increase the risk of their management. The infrequency of these lesions is the main reason why many neurosurgeons have only limited personal experience with the surgical treatment of VA-PICA aneurysms. With the advent of modern endovascular therapy, the number of lesions available for surgery, particularly the number of less complex VA and VA-PICA aneurysms, has further decreased, a situation that also raises problems in neurosurgical training. On the other hand, recent treatment strategies have gradually changed toward combined endovascular and surgical management, especially in the acute phase of severe subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or in high-risk patients. It is obvious that only a limited number of specialized neurovascular centers can offer sufficient expertise for the safe management of this subgroup of vascular lesions.

Epidemiology

Aneurysms of the VA-PICA complex comprise 0.5% to 3% of all intracranial aneurysms.²^–⁶ Approximately two thirds of these aneurysms are located at the bifurcation of the VAPICA junction, whereas distal PICA aneurysms account for approximately 0.3% to 1% of all aneurysms.⁶^–⁸ In a recently published series of 24 patients, distal PICA aneurysms accounted for only 0.3% of all intracranial aneurysms and for 3.7% of the vertebrobasilar lesions; 74% were saccular, 7% were fusiform, and 19% were dissecting.⁷ Until 1992, only 140 patients harboring an aneurysm of the VA-PICA complex were reported in the literature⁹; of these, approximately 75% were VA or VA-PICA and 25% were distal PICA aneurysms. Multiple occurrence was occasionally reported.^4,¹⁰^–¹³ Although the incidence of aneurysms arising in association with arteriovenous malformations may be as high as 46%, the combination of a VA-PICA aneurysm and an arteriovenous malformation is rarely reported in the literature.¹⁴^–¹⁶ With 85%, there is a clear predominance of female patients,^4,^5,^17,¹⁸ even more notable in saccular aneurysms.¹⁹ Patients of virtually all ages may be affected, with an average age of 49.3 years.²⁰

Aneurysm Characteristics

In contrast to intracranial aneurysms of other locations, only approximately 60% of VA-PICA aneurysms are saccular; approximately 30% are dissecting and 10% fusiform.^9,^21,²² In Yamaura’s¹⁸ series, there were 60% saccular, 27% dissecting, and 13% arteriosclerotic fusiform aneurysms; moreover, he found three giant lesions with a diameter exceeding 25 mm and two partially thrombosed saccular aneurysms. Drs. Drake and Peerless and colleagues have treated the world’s largest series of patients with vertebrobasilar aneurysms, comprising 1767 individual patients, of whom 217 (12.3%) harbored aneurysms of the VA-PICA complex.^19,^20,²³ One hundred sixty-six lesions were saccular (76.5%), 25 were dissecting (11%), 18 were fusiform (8%), 4 were atherosclerotic (1.8%), 3 were associated with an arteriovenous malformation (1.3%), and 1 was traumatic (0.4%). The majority (70%) were small (<12 mm); 27 aneurysms (12%) were large (13 to 24 mm) and 40 (18%) were giant (>25 mm). Left-sided origin was more common (55%). Forty-three aneurysms (19%) were unruptured.^19,²³

Fusiform aneurysms appear as spindle-shaped dilatations, the vertebrobasilar trunk being the most frequent location for fusiform aneurysms.²⁴ Due to a clear difference in natural history and optimal therapy, they must be clearly distinguished from dissecting aneurysms. More than two decades ago, nontraumatic dissecting aneurysms were considered to be extremely rare. However, improved neuroradiologic imaging techniques have demonstrated such lesions with increasing frequency, and during the past years, this type of aneurysm has received great attention in the pertinent literature.^10,^22,²⁵ On arteriography, such aneurysms appear as a saccular or spindle-shaped vascular dilatation, occasionally combined with proximal stenosis. The classic arteriographic features of dissecting arteries include the double-lumen sign, retention of contrast medium, the pearl-and-string sign,²⁶ and focal outpouching.^22,²⁷ Usually, they are not related to vascular branches of the VA. Such dissecting aneurysms of the VA may occur proximal as well as distal to the origin of the PICA, but occasionally they may involve the origin of the PICA as well.²⁸ Yasui and colleagues²⁹ believe that a fusiform VA aneurysm is one predisposing condition for a dissecting lesion. The sudden disruption of the internal elastic lamina is the primary mechanism underlying the development of dissecting aneurysms. The plane of dissection extends through the media, and most aneurysms have one entrance to this pseudolumen.³⁰ Dissecting aneurysms of the VA often cause SAH by rupture of the adventitia and present a high risk of rebleeding.^28,^31,³² These lesions are not confined to the VA but may be observed on the distal PICA as well.^7,^33,³⁴ Occasionally, a dissecting distal PICA aneurysm can develop as a traumatic lesion.³⁵

Extreme dilations of the VA, termed “dolichoectasias,” occur less frequently and are usually difficult to treat. The involved artery is elongated and tortuous. On histologic examination, large defects within the muscular and elastic lamina can be detected and sometimes also extensive arteriosclerotic changes.³⁰ Although dissecting aneurysms occur more frequently in male patients of younger age, dolichoectasias occur more frequently in the seventh decade.^9,^22,^36,³⁷

Historical Background

According to Hudgins and colleagues,⁴ the first case description of a saccular VA-PICA aneurysm was given by Cruveilhier in 1829. Rizzoli and Hayes³⁸ were the first to surgically treat such an aneurysm in 1947 by interrupting the parent artery with two silver clips. Interestingly, the aneurysm was detected by these authors on a ventriculogram that showed a displaced fourth ventricle. Lewis and colleagues³³ mentioned that the first case of an aneurysm arising from the distal segment of the PICA was reported in 1864 by Fernet and that the first surgical treatment of a peripheral PICA aneurysm is accredited to Olivecrona. In the 1950s and 1960s, vertebrobasilar aneurysms were associated with the highest mortality rate.³⁹ Rizzoli and Hayes³⁸ treated a peripheral PICA aneurysm with trapping in 1953. Uihlein and Hughes⁴⁰ described in 1955 the nonsurgical treatment of 14 patients harboring a posterior fossa aneurysm; eight of these patients died after the aneurysm ruptured. After the introduction of routine vertebral angiography in patients with SAH, such aneurysms were detected with increasing frequency. In 1958, Desaussure and colleagues⁴¹ reported the successful surgical obliteration of two PICA aneurysms found on vertebral angiograms. Further improvements of neuroradiologic techniques after the introduction of transfemoral catheter and subtraction angiography as well as the routine use of microsurgical techniques in neurosurgery have dramatically improved the outcome of surgical procedures for treatment of vertebrobasilar aneurysms.^42,⁴³

Neuroradiologic Imaging

A meticulous preoperative neuroradiologic assessment is indispensable for successful treatment of VA and VA-PICA aneurysms. Neuroradiologic investigations should clarify the following features: (1) the exact location and origin of the aneurysm with respect to the VA and the various segments of the PICA (Fig. 78-1); (2) the size, shape, extent, and limits of the lesion to differentiate between saccular, fusiform, and dissecting aneurysms; (3) the orientation of the neck and the dome of the aneurysm; (4) the presence or absence of sufficient collateral circulation; (5) the patency of both VAs and the dominance of one of them, if present; (6) the presence or absence of multiple intracranial aneurysms or an associated arteriovenous malformation; (7) the precise relationship to the major surrounding anatomic structures as well as the degree of involvement of the brain stem and rootlets of the lower cranial nerves; and (8) the presence of hydrocephalus and/or intracerebellar/intraventricular hemorrhage.

FIGURE 78-1 The segmental nomenclature of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) and the vertebral artery complex (VA) for possible localizations of aneurysm formation. 1, Anterior medullary segment; 2, lateral medullary segment; 3, tonsillomedullary segment; 4, telovelotonsillar segment; 5, cortical branch segments.

(Courtesy of Christoph Kappus.)

Neuroradiologic studies include high-quality arterial digital angiography as well as various techniques of coronal, sagittal, and axial magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography (CT). Digital subtraction angiography may be complemented by rotational angiography with 3-dimensional rendering. Yonekawa and colleagues ⁴⁴ described three distances that can be measured on preoperative angiograms that are important predictors of the difficulty of operative access to VA-PICA aneurysms: the distance of the aneurysm from the midline, the distance from the most lateral point of the foramen magnum, and the distance from the clivus. According to these authors, optimal results are obtained when these distances are more than 5 to 10 mm, less than 10 to 21 mm, and less than 13 mm, respectively.

In a previous communication, we emphasized that high-resolution CT using a bone tissue algorithm is most useful to demonstrate the configuration of the skull base around the jugular foramen, in particular showing the size and shape of the jugular tubercle, the size of the posterior condylar canal, and the distance between the dural entrance of the vertebral artery and the hypoglossal canal or jugular tubercle.⁴⁵ Special sections or 3-dimensional reconstructions may further add to the understanding of the individual skull base configuration or presence of bony anomalies. When performed with a bolus of contrast medium, this 3-dimensional CT image may demonstrate the relationship between the lesion, brain stem, and skull base, adding important information required for the planning of the procedure.⁴⁵ Huynh-Le and colleagues⁴⁶ have confirmed the utility of 3-dimensional CT angiography for the surgical management of VA-PICA aneurysms; this diagnostic technique was most valuable in demonstrating not only the exact site and shape of the aneurysm but also the relationships between parent vessel and malformation on the one side and the bony structures of the skull base on the other side. CT is important to demonstrate the SAH, the blood distribution within the basal cisterns, an associated hydrocephalus, and an intraventricular or intracerebellar hemorrhage. Intraventricular hemorrhage is present in as many as 82% of patients and associated hydrocephalus in approximately 75% of patients with ruptured aneurysms.^5,^47,⁴⁸ Magnetic resonance imaging is particularly valuable in fusiform, dissecting, or partially thrombosed aneurysms.^30,⁴⁹ Magnetic resonance angiography can depict the aneurysm in relation to the brain stem, cerebellum, caudal cranial nerves, and skull base.

Clinical Presentation

The most frequent presenting symptom of patients with aneurysms of the VA-PICA complex is SAH. Rupture of these aneurysms occurs similarly to the rupture of aneurysms of the anterior circulation. However, the clinical consequences are far more disastrous. Although only a few patients experience intracerebellar hemorrhage or deficits of caudal cranial nerves, in some instances, prolonged coma, hemiparesis, or pulmonary embolism can occur.^50,⁵¹ Aneurysm rupture occurs more frequently in lesions smaller than 12 mm. Large and giant aneurysms rarely rupture; they become symptomatic more frequently by their compressive effect on the lower brain stem or the caudal cranial nerves. Ischemic complications such as Wallenberg’s syndrome may occur in dissecting aneurysms due to occlusion of perforating arteries that supply the lateral aspect of the medulla. Patients with dolichoectatic VA and/or basilar artery may have ischemic stroke, brain stem compression, and occasionally hemifacial spasm or trigeminal neuralgia.⁵² In the series of Drake and Peerless⁵³ of 221 patients, 178 had SAH (80.5%). Sixth nerve palsy, not lower cranial nerve paresis, was the most frequent preoperative cranial nerve dysfunction, as one might have expected. It was nearly always associated with SAH and recovered in 75% completely.

Management

The decision as to whether an aneurysm of the VA-PICA complex should be treated, as well as the timing and choice of treatment modality in case treatment appears indicated, depends on criteria such as the patient’s age, actual clinical condition, and neurologic status; progression or resolution of initial symptoms and signs; presence or absence of SAH; the interval between SAH and time of decision making; aneurysm characteristics; medical history; and the presence or absence of hydrocephalus and intraventricular or intracerebellar hemorrhage. Surgery, for instance, is preferable when a significant hematoma needs to be evacuated. For more than a decade, the concomitant availability of endovascular and microsurgical procedures has made possible a multimodal treatment of aneurysms of the VA-PICA complex.⁵⁴^–⁵⁷ Particularly, the technologic achievements in neurovascular instrumentation (i.e., coil technology, intracranial stent technique) of the recent years led to a continuing challenge for interventional neuroradiologists, enabling them to treat even previously “untreatable” aneurysms with a high success rate.⁵⁸^–⁶⁶ However, complications of the treatment such as brain stem infarction and hemorrhages are also reported for the interventional therapy of VA-PICA aneurysms.^61,^67,⁶⁸ For some rare complex cases, a combined interventional and microsurgical therapy may constitute a reasonable solution.⁵⁸

In some aneurysms such as proximal PICA lesions, even in cases in which endovascular coil occlusion of the aneurysms seems possible, the direct microsurgical inspection of the affected segment of the PICA and of perforating brain stem-supplying arteries may offer significant advantages compared with endovascular therapy.³³ Considering the complexity and heterogeneity of VA and VA-PICA aneurysms, most lesions might require an individual case-by-case decision.

Surgical Approaches

To expose aneurysms of the VA-PICA complex surgically, a detailed analysis of aneurysm location, origin, extension, and orientation of the dome is necessary. Small saccular VA-PICA aneurysms may be exposed by a traditional suboccipital medial or lateral approach when they are located proximal to the rootlets of the lower cranial nerves. Aneurysms located more distally or even at the vertebrobasilar junction, as well as large or giant saccular or complex dissecting aneurysms, may require more extensive skull base approaches. Aneurysms of the third, fourth, and fifth PICA segments are best visualized via a suboccipital medial craniotomy. The patient is placed in either the sitting or prone position with the head flexed. The craniotomy includes the posterior rim of the foramen magnum. A number of lateral approaches are available to expose various aneurysms of the VA or the first two PICA segments.^2,^9,⁶⁹^–⁷² For exposure of some proximal VA aneurysms, a traditional retrosigmoid approach may be sufficient.⁷³ However, several authors have underscored the necessity of extending the exposure more laterally.⁶⁹ The retrolabyrinthine transsigmoidal approach was described by Giannotta and Maceri⁷⁴ in 1988 and used to expose distal VA-PICA aneurysms or those of the vertebrobasilar junction.

It is a complex and more time-consuming skull base approach because large portions of the petrous bone must be drilled away and the ipsilateral sigmoid sinus is ligated, provided the contralateral sinus is intact. This approach, however, is rarely described in the literature for treatment of aneurysms of the VA-PICA complex. The transcondylar approach and several variations have been widely used by several authors in this context.^33,⁷⁵^–⁷⁹ A detailed description of the technique as we use it is given later in this chapter. Aneurysms that are not suitable for either surgical clipping or endovascular procedure may require other surgical techniques such as coating,^5,⁸⁰ external (surgical) trapping,⁴ or one of the various procedures of revascularization.

Saccular Aneurysms

Hernesniemi ⁸¹ mentioned that most saccular nongiant aneurysms of the VA-PICA complex can be clipped. Today, most authors prefer an early treatment of these aneurysms after rupture, including distal PICA aneurysms,³³ and also when they are associated with an arteriovenous malformation.^15,⁸² The decision as to whether surgical clipping or endovascular coil occlusion is preferable should be made by an experienced neurovascular team. In the series of Horiuchi and colleagues⁷ comprising 27 PICA aneurysms in 24 patients, 22 lesions were clipped (81%), 2 (7%) were wrapped, 1 (4%) was proximally ligated with occipital artery-PICA bypass, and only 1 (4%) was occluded endovascularly with Guglielmi detachable (GD) coils.

Fusiform Aneurysms

For fusiform aneurysms of the VA and PICA, there is no safe surgical technique without major risk of severe morbidity. Moreover, the natural history of unruptured fusiform aneurysms is not well known. The rebleeding rate of such aneurysms is estimated at 10% per year, which is remarkably minor when compared with saccular or dissecting aneurysms. Observation and conservative treatment appear justified in view of the favorable history of many of these aneurysms.

Dissecting Aneurysms

With modern neuroimaging techniques, the diagnosis of dissecting aneurysms is now more precise than in the past.^49,⁸³ Although a benign course has occasionally been documented,⁸⁴ the necessity of early treatment of dissecting aneurysms of the VA has been emphasized by many authors. An SAH from a dissecting aneurysm is considered a neurosurgical emergency because of a high incidence of rebleeding and a high mortality rate at the time of recurrent bleeding.^22,^30,^31,⁵⁵ Conversely, the natural history of non-SAH cases is relatively benign and therefore the treatment remains controversial.⁸⁵^–⁸⁷ Despite early satisfactory results with a proximal occlusion of the VA,⁸⁸ it is now well recognized that proximal occlusion of the affected VA by clip placement or endovascular procedure may not be sufficient.²⁸ The primary goal of therapy is thus complete exclusion of the dissecting aneurysm from the circulation to avoid progression of the vascular dissection or a distal embolism with ischemic complications.²⁸ In most cases, clip occlusion is impossible and wrapping alone may not be efficient.⁸³ Test occlusion of the vertebral artery is performed, and thereafter either surgical or endovascular occlusion (internal trapping) is recommended.⁵⁴ According to Hamada and colleagues,²⁸ when occlusion of the VA is chosen as treatment option, patients should undergo a 20-minute occlusion tolerance test using a nondetachable balloon. Yoshimoto and Wakai⁸⁷ have questioned the necessity of this balloon test because they doubt its reliability; these authors believe that definitive unilateral VA occlusion can be performed safely unless the contralateral VA is hypoplastic. Kitanaka and colleagues⁸⁹ have mentioned that the choice of surgical technique depends on the location of the dissecting aneurysm in relation to the origin of the PICA. The VA can usually be occluded distal to the PICA origin, whereas a proximal occlusion of the VA may cause a secondary thrombosis of the PICA. A number of revascularization techniques have therefore been applied to occlude the VA with a consecutive reanastomosis of the PICA: PICA-PICA bypass at the level of the caudal loop,⁹⁰^–⁹² occipital artery-PICA,⁹³^–⁹⁸ VA-PICA anastomosis with the superficial temporal artery or radial artery,⁹⁹^–¹⁰¹ and VA-PICA transposition.¹⁰²

Giant Aneurysms

Despite the rare occurrence of giant aneurysms of the posterior circulation, these lesions have received much attention in the literature.^11,¹⁰³^–¹⁰⁶

The reasons for their frequent description are special characteristics of these lesions. The therapy of giant aneurysms is far more difficult that of those in the anterior circulation. Ausman and colleagues ⁹³ have recommended surgical clip occlusion in cooperation with cardiosurgeons under hypothermia and circulatory arrest.¹⁰⁷ This method, however, has a specific morbidity and is associated with a certain mortality. The optimal therapy of giant aneurysms is the direct clip occlusion, which still bears a high risk for the patient. For this reason, the parent artery (VA) may be deliberately sacrificed or endovascularly occluded,¹⁰⁸ the same technique as that used for dissecting or fusiform aneurysms. According to Inamasu and colleagues¹⁰⁹ who treated six patients with giant VA and four patients with VA-PICA aneurysms surgically, more favorable results were obtained with surgical or endovascular rather than with conservative therapy.

The Authors’ Series

A total of 69 patients with aneurysms of the VA-PICA complex were treated in the period 1992 to 2004. Thirty patients were treated surgically, 33 endovascularly and 6 conservatively. Patient data are summarized in Table 78-1.

Table 78-1 Treatment Modalities for Patients with VA-PICA Aneurysms (Treated by the Authors)

Authors’ Preferred Surgical Technique

Our preferred approach to VA and VA-PICA aneurysms, the suboccipital transcondylar approach, derives from the classic access route to the cerebellopontine angle and anterolateral aspect of the foramen magnum. The microsurgical exposure of these lesions usually requires extensive drilling of the bone around the jugular foramen. Among the pertinent anatomic structures of this area, the jugular tubercle plays a key role. When drilling the jugular tubercle, we must control a number of vital anatomic structures around the jugular foramen, which are described in more detail later in this chapter. Considering the great variability of the aneurysms to be treated, we do not advocate a rigid surgical approach. Instead, with a precise knowledge of all individual morphologic, pathomorphologic, and functional details, we design and perform the procedure in an individually tailored fashion, according to the guiding principle of minimal invasiveness. In our understanding, this principle as applied to skull base surgery means obtaining maximal microsurgical exposure with the least possible amount of surgical trauma. Apart from aneurysms of the distal PICA that can be treated via the median suboccipital or the telovelar route, we usually start the procedure with a limited suboccipital transcondylar approach. This procedure is then gradually extended according to the specific requirements of each case. It is obvious that our policy of minimal invasiveness has important implications on the planning of the procedure, the positioning of the patient on the surgical table, the skin incision and muscle opening, the removal of bone at the base of the skull, and the intradural microsurgical technique.

Surgical Anatomy

The origin of the PICA at the VA varies from extradurally, below the foramen magnum, to the vertebrobasilar junction. The PICA arises from the posterior or lateral surfaces of the VA more often than from the anterior or medial surfaces.¹¹⁰ The PICA is the artery with the most complex relationship to the cranial nerves of any artery.¹¹¹ By definition, the PICA originates from the VA. Although rarely encountered (5%), one must bear in mind the possibility of an extradural origin of the PICA and of an extracranial (intradural) site of distal PICA aneurysms.^110,¹¹² In a few cases, the VA and the PICA are missing. If the PICA is present, it is the largest branch of the VA.¹¹⁰ Lister and colleagues¹¹³

Buy Membership for Neurosurgery Category to continue reading. Learn more here