Sudden Deterioration in Neurologic Status

Published on 22/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2478 times

1 Sudden Deterioration in Neurologic Status

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with critical illness or injury are at risk for neurologic complications.15 A sudden or unexpected change in the neurologic condition of a critically ill patient often heralds a complication that may cause direct injury to the central nervous system (CNS). Alternatively, such changes may simply be neurologic manifestations of the underlying critical illness or treatment that necessitated ICU admission (e.g., sepsis). These complications can occur in patients admitted to the ICU without neurologic disease and in those admitted for management of primary CNS problems (e.g., stroke). Neurologic complications also can occur as a result of invasive procedures and therapeutic interventions performed. Commonly, recognition of neurologic complications is delayed or missed entirely because ICU treatments (e.g., intubation, drugs) interfere with the physical examination or confound the clinical picture. In other cases, neurologic complications are not recognized because of a lack of sensitive methods to detect the problem (e.g., delirium). Morbidity and mortality are increased among patients who develop neurologic complications; therefore, the intensivist must be vigilant in evaluating all critically ill patients for changes in neurologic status.

Despite the importance of neurologic complications of critical illness, few studies have specifically assessed their incidence and impact on outcome among ICU patients. Available data are limited to medical ICU patients; data regarding neurologic complications in general surgical and other specialty ICU populations must be extracted from other sources. In studies of medical ICU patients, the incidence of neurologic complications is 12.3% to 33%.1,2 Patients who develop neurologic complications have increased morbidity, mortality, and ICU length of stay. Sepsis is the most common problem associated with development of neurologic complications (sepsis-associated encephalopathy). In addition to encephalopathy, other common neurologic complications associated with critical illness include seizures and stroke. As the complexity of ICU care has increased, so has the risk of neurologic complications. Neuromuscular disorders are now recognized as a major source of morbidity in severely ill patients.6 Recognized neurologic complications occurring in selected medical, surgical, and neurologic ICU populations are shown in Table 1-1.741

TABLE1-1 Neurologic Complications in Selected Specialty Populations

Medical
Bone marrow transplantation7,8 CNS infection, stroke, subdural hematoma, brainstem ischemia, hyperammonemia, Wernicke encephalopathy
Cancer9 Stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, CNS infection
Fulminant hepatic failure10 Encephalopathy, coma, brain edema, increased ICP
HIV/AIDS11,12 Opportunistic CNS infection, stroke, vasculitis, delirium, seizures, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
Pregnancy13,14 Seizures, ischemic stroke, cerebral vasospasm, intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral venous thrombosis, hypertensive encephalopathy, pituitary apoplexy
Surgical
Cardiac surgery1519 Stroke, delirium, brachial plexus injury, phrenic nerve injury
Vascular surgery20,21:  
Carotid Stroke, cranial nerve injuries (recurrent laryngeal, glossopharyngeal, hypoglossal, facial), seizures
Aortic Stroke, paraplegia
Peripheral Delirium
Transplantation10,2225:  
Heart Stroke
Liver Encephalopathy, seizures, opportunistic CNS infection, intracranial hemorrhage, Guillain-Barré syndrome, central pontine myelinolysis
Renal Stroke, opportunistic CNS infection, femoral neuropathy
Urologic surgery (TURP)26 Seizures and coma (hyponatremia)
Otolaryngologic surgery27,28 Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, stroke, delirium
Orthopedic surgery29:  
Spine Myelopathy, radiculopathy, epidural abscess, meningitis
Knee and hip replacement Delirium (fat embolism)
Long-bone fracture/nailing Delirium (fat embolism)
Neurologic
Stroke3034 Stroke progression or extension, reocclusion after thrombolysis, bleeding, seizures, delirium, brain edema, herniation
Intracranial surgery35 Bleeding, edema, seizures, CNS infection
Subarachnoid hemorrhage32,3638 Rebleeding, vasospasm, hydrocephalus, seizures
Traumatic brain injury32,39,40 Intracranial hypertension, bleeding, seizures, stroke (cerebrovascular injury), CNS infection
Cervical spinal cord injury41 Ascension of injury, stroke (vertebral artery injury)

CNS, central nervous system; HIV/AIDS, human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; ICP, intracranial pressure; TURP, transurethral prostatic resection.

image Impairment in Consciousness

Global changes in CNS function, best described in terms of impairment in consciousness, are generally referred to as encephalopathy or altered mental status. An acute change in the level of consciousness undoubtedly is the most common neurologic complication that occurs after ICU admission. Consciousness is defined as a state of awareness (arousal or wakefulness) and the ability to respond appropriately to changes in environment.42 For consciousness to be impaired, global hemispheric dysfunction or dysfunction of the brainstem reticular activating system must be present.43 Altered consciousness may result in a sleeplike state (coma) or a state characterized by confusion and agitation (delirium). States of acutely altered consciousness seen in the critically ill are listed in Table 1-2.

TABLE1-2 States of Acutely Altered Consciousness

State Description
Coma Closed eyes, sleeplike state with no response to external stimuli (pain)
Stupor Responsive only to vigorous or painful stimuli
Lethargy Drowsy, arouses easily and appropriately to stimuli
Delirium Acute state of confusion with or without behavioral disturbance
Catatonia Eyes open, unblinking, unresponsive

When an acute change in consciousness is noted, the patient should be evaluated keeping in mind the patient’s age, presence or absence of coexisting organ system dysfunction, metabolic status and medication list, and presence or absence of infection. In patients with a primary CNS disorder, deterioration in the level of consciousness (e.g., from stupor to coma) frequently represents the development of brain edema, increasing intracranial pressure, new or worsening intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, CNS infection, or cerebral vasospasm. In patients without a primary CNS diagnosis, an acute change in consciousness is often due to the development of infectious complications (i.e., sepsis-associated encephalopathy), drug toxicities, or the development or exacerbation of organ system failure. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus is increasingly being recognized as a cause of impaired consciousness in critically ill patients (Box 1-1).4453

States of altered consciousness manifesting as impairment in wakefulness or arousal (i.e., coma and stupor) and their causes are well defined.42,43,54,55 Much confusion remains, however, regarding the diagnosis and management of delirium, perhaps the most common state of impaired CNS functioning in critically ill patients at large. When dedicated instruments are used, delirium can be diagnosed in more than 80% of critically ill patients, making this condition the most common neurologic complication of critical illness.5658 Much of the difficulty in establishing the diagnosis of delirium stems from the belief that delirium is a state characterized mainly by confusion and agitation and that such states are expected consequences of the unique environmental factors and sleep deprivation that characterize the ICU experience. Terms previously used to describe delirium in critically ill patients include ICU psychosis, acute confusional state, encephalopathy, and postoperative psychosis. It is now recognized that ICU psychosis is a misnomer; delirium is a more accurate term.59

Currently accepted criteria for the diagnosis of delirium include abrupt onset of impaired consciousness, disturbed cognitive function, fluctuating course, and presence of a medical condition that could impair brain function.60 Subtypes of delirium include hyperactive (agitated) delirium and the more common hypoactive or quiet delirium.58 Impaired consciousness may be apparent as a reduction in awareness, psychomotor retardation, agitation, or impairment in attention (increased distractibility or vigilance). Cognitive impairment can include disorientation, impaired memory, and perceptual aberrations (hallucinations or illusions).61 Autonomic hyperactivity and sleep disturbances may be features of delirium in some patients (e.g., those with drug withdrawal syndromes, delirium tremens). Delirium in critically ill patients is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and ICU length of stay.6264 In general, sepsis and medications should be the primary etiologic considerations in critically ill patients who develop delirium.

As has been noted, nonconvulsive status epilepticus is increasingly recognized as an important cause of impaired consciousness in critically ill patients. Although the general term can encompasses other entities, such as absence and partial complex seizures, in critically ill patients, nonconvulsive status epilepticus is often referred to as status epilepticus of epileptic encephalopathy.53 It is characterized by alteration in consciousness or behavior associated with electroencephalographic evidence of continuous or periodic epileptiform activity without overt motor manifestations of seizures. In one study of comatose patients without overt seizure activity, nonconvulsive status epilepticus was evident in 8%.51 Nonconvulsive status epilepticus can precede or follow an episode of generalized convulsive status epilepticus; it can also occur in patients with traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, global brain ischemia or anoxia, sepsis, and multiple organ failure. Despite the general consensus that nonconvulsive status epilepticus is a unique entity responsible for impaired consciousness in some critically ill patients, there is no general consensus on the electroencephalographic criteria for its diagnosis or the optimal approach to treatment.65

image Stroke and Other Focal Neurologic Deficits

The new onset of a major neurologic deficit that manifests as a focal impairment in motor or sensory function (e.g., hemiparesis) or results in seizures usually indicates a primary problem referable to the cerebrovascular circulation. In a study evaluating the value of computed tomography (CT) in medical ICU patients, ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding were the most common abnormalities associated with the new onset of a neurologic deficit or seizures.66 Overall, the frequency of new-onset stroke is between 1% and 4% in medical ICU patients.1,2 Among general surgical patients, the frequency of perioperative stroke ranges from 0.3% to 3.5%.67 Patients undergoing cardiac or vascular surgery and surgical patients with underlying cerebrovascular disease can be expected to have an increased risk of perioperative stroke.19

The frequency of new or worsening focal neurologic deficits in patients admitted with a primary neurologic or neurosurgical disorder varies. For example, as many as 30% of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage develop delayed ischemic neurologic deficits.36 Patients admitted with stroke often develop worsening or new symptoms as a result of stroke progression, bleeding, or reocclusion of vessels previously opened with interventional therapy. In patients who have undergone elective intracranial surgery, postsurgical bleeding or infectious complications are the main causes of new focal deficits. In trauma patients, unrecognized injuries to the cerebrovascular circulation can cause new deficits. Patients who have sustained spinal cord injuries, and those who have undergone surgery of the spine or of the thoracic or abdominal aorta, can develop worsening or new symptoms of spinal cord injury. Early deterioration of CNS function after spinal cord injury usually occurs as a consequence of medical interventions to stabilize the spine, whereas late deterioration is usually due to hypotension and impaired cord perfusion. Occasionally, focal weakness or sensory symptoms in the extremities occur as a result of occult brachial plexus injury or compression neuropathy. New cranial nerve deficits in patients without primary neurologic problems can occur after neck surgery or carotid endarterectomy.

image Seizures

The new onset of motor seizures occurs in 0.8% to 4% of critically ill medical ICU patients.1,2,68 The new onset of seizures in general medical-surgical ICU patients is typically caused by narcotic withdrawal, hyponatremia, drug toxicities, or previously unrecognized structural abnormalities.3,68 New stroke, intracranial bleeding, and CNS infection are other potential causes of seizures after ICU admission. The frequency of seizures is higher in patients admitted to the ICU with a primary neurologic problem such as traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke, or CNS infection.69 Because nonconvulsive status epilepticus may be more common than was previously appreciated, this problem should also be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients developing new, unexplained, or prolonged alterations in consciousness.

image Generalized Weakness and Neuromuscular Disorders

Generalized muscle weakness often becomes apparent in ICU patients as previous impairments in arousal are resolving or sedative and neuromuscular blocking agents are being discontinued or tapered. Polyneuropathy and myopathy associated with critical illness are now well recognized as the principal causes of new-onset generalized weakness among ICU patients being treated for non-neuromuscular disorders.5,7073 These disorders also may be responsible for prolonged ventilator dependency in some patients. Patients at increased risk for these complications include those with sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, as well as those who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Other risk factors include treatment with corticosteroids or neuromuscular blocking agents. In contrast to demyelinating neuropathies (e.g., Guillain-Barré syndrome), critical illness polyneuropathy is primarily an axonal condition. Critical illness polyneuropathy is diagnosed in a high percentage of patients undergoing careful evaluation for weakness acquired while in the ICU. Because primary myopathy coexists in a large number of patients with critical illness polyneuropathy, ICU-acquired paresis72 or critical illness neuromuscular abnormalities5 may be better terms to describe this problem. Although acute Guillain-Barré syndrome and myasthenia gravis are rare complications of critical illness, these diagnoses should also be considered in patients who develop generalized weakness in the ICU.

image Neurologic Complications of Procedures and Treatments

Routine procedures performed in the ICU or in association with evaluation and treatment of critical illness can result in neurologic complications.4 The most obvious neurologic complications are those associated with intracranial bleeding secondary to the treatment of stroke and other disorders with thrombolytic agents or anticoagulants. Other notable complications are listed in Table 1-3.

TABLE1-3 Neurologic Complications Associated with ICU Procedures and Treatments

Procedure Complication
Angiography Cerebral cholesterol emboli syndrome
Anticoagulants/antiplatelet agents Intracranial bleeding
Arterial catheterization Cerebral embolism
Bronchoscopy Increased ICP
Central venous catheterization Cerebral air embolism, carotid dissection, Horner’s syndrome, phrenic nerve injury, brachial plexus injury, cranial nerve injury
DC cardioversion Embolic stroke, seizures
Dialysis Seizures, increased ICP (dialysis disequilibrium syndrome)
Endovascular procedures (CNS) Vessel rupture, thrombosis, reperfusion bleeding
Epidural catheter Spinal epidural hematoma, epidural abscess
ICP monitoring CNS infection (ventriculitis), hemorrhage
Intraaortic balloon pump Lower-extremity paralysis
Intubation Spinal cord injury
Left ventricular assist devices Stroke, seizures
Lumbar puncture or drain Meningitis, herniation
Mechanical ventilation Cerebral air embolism, increased ICP (high PEEP and hypercapnia), seizures (hypocapnia)
Nasogastric intubation Intracranial placement

CNS, central nervous system; DC, direct current; ICP, intracranial pressure; ICU, intensive care unit; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure.

image Evaluation of Sudden Neurologic Change

A new or sudden change in the neurologic condition of a critically ill patient necessitates a focused neurologic examination, review of the clinical course and medications administered before the change, a thorough laboratory assessment, and appropriate imaging or neurophysiologic studies when indicated. The type and extent of the evaluation depend on clinical context and the general category of neurologic change occurring. The history and physical examination should lead the clinician to the diagnostic approach best suited to the individual patient.

Essential elements of the neurologic examination include an assessment of the level and content of consciousness, pupillary size and reactivity, and motor function. Additional evaluation of the cranial nerves and peripheral reflexes and a sensory examination are conducted as indicated by the clinical circumstances. If the patient is comatose on initial evaluation, a more detailed coma examination should be performed to help differentiate structural from metabolic causes of coma.43,55 When the evaluation reveals only a change in arousal without evidence of a localizing lesion in the CNS, a search for infection, discontinuation or modification of drug therapy, and a general metabolic evaluation may be indicated. Lumbar puncture to aid the diagnosis of CNS infection may be warranted in selected neurosurgical patients and immunocompromised individuals. Lumbar puncture to rule out nosocomially acquired meningitis in other patients is generally not rewarding.74 Electroencephalography should be performed in patients with clear evidence of seizures, as well as when the diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus is being entertained. Continuous electroencephalography should be considered when the index of suspicion for nonconvulsive status epilepticus remains high and the initial electroencephalographic studies are unrevealing.

CT is indicated for non-neurologic patients with new focal deficits, seizures, or otherwise unexplained impairments in arousal.66 In patients with primary neurologic disorders, CT is indicated if worsening brain edema, herniation, bleeding, and hydrocephalus are considerations when new deficits or worsening neurologic status occurs. In some cases, when the basis for a change in neurologic condition remains elusive, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be helpful. In particular, the diffusion-weighted MRI technique can reveal structural abnormalities such as hypoxic brain injury, fat embolism, vasculitis, cerebral venous thrombosis, or multiple infarcts following cardiopulmonary bypass that are not apparent by standard CT or conventional MRI.7580 MRI may be the imaging modality of choice in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and new CNS complications.75 For patients who develop signs and symptoms of spinal cord injury complicating critical illness, MRI or somatosensory evoked potentials can be used to further delineate the nature and severity of the injury. For patients who develop generalized muscle weakness or unexplained ventilator dependency, electromyography and nerve conduction studies can confirm the presence of critical illness polyneuropathy or myopathy.

image Monitoring for Neurologic Changes

The common occurrence of neurologic changes in critically ill patients emphasizes the need for vigilant monitoring. A variety of clinical techniques such as the Glasgow Coma Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Ramsay Sedation Scale, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) can be used to monitor clinical neurologic status.57,58,8186 Neurophysiologic methods such as the bispectral index may provide more objective neurologic monitoring in the future for patients admitted to the ICU with and without primary neurologic problems.8789 For patients admitted to the ICU with a primary neurologic disorder, a variety of monitoring techniques including measurements of intracranial pressure, near-infrared spectroscopy, brain tissue PO2, transcranial Doppler, and electroencephalography are available.90

Annotated References

De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, et al. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit. A prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 2002;288:2859-2867.

This prospective multicenter study of critically ill patients was the first to assess the clinical incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients developing ICU-acquired weakness, emphasizing a central role for corticosteroid use in its genesis and prolonged mechanical ventilation as a relevant ICU outcome.

Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients. Validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001;286:2703-2710.

Recognizing that the diagnosis of delirium is often difficult in the critically ill patient receiving mechanical ventilation, the authors adapted a common method for assessing delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method to critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. This prospective evaluation revealed high sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater reliability in detecting delirium in 80% of the patient population they studied.

McGuire BE, Basten CJ, Ryan CJ, et al. Intensive care unit syndrome. A dangerous misnomer. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:906-909.

In an effort to dispel the myth that environmental conditions lead to “ICU psychosis,” the authors of this article argue that ICU psychosis is more appropriately described as delirium. The etiology and management of delirium in critically ill patients are reviewed.

Naik-Tolani S, Oropello JM, Benjamin E. Neurologic complications in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med. 1999;20:423-434.

The authors of this article present an overview of central nervous system (CNS) complications of critical illness and ICU procedures in critically ill patients without primary disorders of the CNS.

Sundgren PC, Reinstrup P, Romner B, et al. Value of conventional diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI in the management of patients with unclear cerebral pathology, admitted to the intensive care unit. Neuroradiology. 2002;44:674-680.

This retrospective study of 21 critically ill patients undergoing MRI because of a disparity in clinical neurologic findings and CT imaging revealed that additional useful diagnostic and prognostic information can be obtained, especially when diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR sequences are obtained.

References

1 Isensee LM, Weiner LJ, Hart BG. Neurologic disorders in a medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 1989;4:208-210.

2 Bleck TP, Smith MC, Pierre-Louis SJ, et al. Neurologic complications of critical medical illnesses. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:98-103.

3 Wijdicks EFM. Neurologic complications in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:411-419.

4 Naik-Tolani S, Oropello JM, Benjamin E. Neurologic complications in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med. 1999;20:423-434.

5 Barlas I, Oropello JM, Benjamin E. Neurologic complications in intensive care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001;7:68-73.

6 Lorin S, Nierman DM. Critical illness neuromuscular abnormalities. Crit Care Clin. 2002;18:553-568.

7 Coplin WM, Cochran MS, Levine SR, et al. Stroke after bone marrow transplantation: Frequency, aetiology and outcome. Brain. 2001;124:1043-1051.

8 Sostak P, Padovan CS, Yousry TA, et al. Prospective evaluation of neurological complications after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Neurology. 2003;60:842-848.

9 Rogers LR. Cerebrovascular complications in cancer patients. Neurol Clin. 2003;21:167-192.

10 Krasko A, Deshpande K, Bonvino S. Liver failure, transplantation and critical care. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19:155-183.

11 Said G, Saimont AG, Lacroix C. Neurologic Complications of HIV and AIDS. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998.

12 Treisman GJ, Kaplina AI. Neurologic and psychiatric complications of antiretroviral agents. AIDS. 2002;16:1201-1215.

13 Fox MW, Harms RW, Davis DH. Selected neurologic complications of pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990;65:1595-1618.

14 Lanska DJ, Kryscio RJ. Peripartum stroke and intracranial venous thrombosis in the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:413-418.

15 Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery: Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1857-1863.

16 Hogue CW, Murphy SF, Schechtman KB, et al. Risk factors for early or delayed stroke after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:642-647.

17 Arrowsmith JE, Grocott HP, Reves JG, et al. Central nervous system complications of cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:378-393.

18 Hogue CW, Barzilai B, Pieper KS, et al. Sex differences in neurologic outcomes and mortality after cardiac surgery: a Society of Thoracic Surgery national database report. Circulation. 2001;103:2133-2137.

19 McKhann GM, Grega MA, Borowicz LM, et al. Encephalopathy and stroke after coronary bypass grafting. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1422-1428.

20 Alpagut U, Dayioglu E. Anterior spinal artery syndrome after infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2002;43:865-868.

21 Gopalan PD, Burrows RC. Critical care of the vascular surgery patient. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19:109-125.

22 Patchell RA. Neurological complications of organ transplantation. Ann Neurol. 1994;36:688-703.

23 Bronster DJ, Emre S, Boccagni P, et al. Central nervous system complications in liver transplant recipients—incidence, timing, and long-term follow-up. Clin Transplant. 2000;14:1-7.

24 Liang BC. Neurologic complications of orthotopic liver transplantation. Hosp Physician. 2000;36:43-46.

25 Oliveras A, Roquer J, Puig JM, et al. Stroke in renal transplant recipients: Epidemiology, predictive risk factors and outcome. Clin Transplant. 2003;17:1-8.

26 Leung AKH, Tan IKS. Critical care and the urologic patient. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19:1-10.

27 Bansal A, Miskoff J, Lis RJ. Otolaryngolic critical care. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19:55-72.

28 Garantziotis S, Kyrmizakis DE, Liolios AD. Critical care of the head and neck patient. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19:73-90.

29 Nazon D, Abergel G, Hatem CM. Critical care in orthopedic and spine surgery. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19:33-53.

30 Grotta JC, Welch KM, Fagan SC, et al. Clinical deterioration following improvement in the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke. 2001;32:661-668.

31 Qureshi AI, Tuhrim S, Broderick JP, et al. Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1450-1460.

32 Fahy BG, Sivaraman V. Current concepts in neurocritical care. Anesth Clin North Am. 2002;20:441-462.

33 Ferro JM, Caeiro L, Verdelho A. Delirium in acute stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2002;15:51-55.

34 Sumer M, Ozdemir I, Erturk O. Progression in acute ischemic stroke: Frequency, risk factors, and prognosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2003;10:177-180.

35 Kelly DF. Neurosurgical postoperative care. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1994;5:789-810.

36 Kassell NF, Sasaki T, Colohan AR, et al. Cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1985;16:562-572.

37 Kirsch JR, Diringer MN, Borel CO, et al. Cerebral aneurysms: Mechanisms of injury and critical care interventions. Crit Care Clin. 1989;5:755-772.

38 Tamargo RJ, Walter KA, Oshiro EM. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Prognostic features and outcomes. New Horiz. 1997;5:364-375.

39 Chesnut RM. Secondary brain insults after head injury: Clinical perspectives. New Horiz. 1995;3:366-375.

40 Pilitsis JG, Rengachary SS. Complications of head injury. Neurol Res. 2001;23:227-236.

41 Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Vaccaro AR, et al. The cause of neurologic deterioration after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26:340-346.

42 Cartilidge N. States related to or confused with coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(suppl 1):i18-i19.

43 Plum F, Posner J. The diagnosis of stupor and coma, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1980.

44 Lowenstein DH, Aminoff MJ. Clinical and EEG features of status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology. 1992;42:100-104.

45 Drislane FW. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in patients with cancer. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1994;96:314-318.

46 DeLorenzo RJ, Waterhouse EJ, Towne AR, et al. Persistent nonconvulsive status epilepticus after control of convulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1998;39:833-840.

47 Litt B, Wityk RJ, Hertz SH, et al. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the critically ill elderly. Epilepsia. 1998;39:1194-1202.

48 Jordan KG. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in acute brain injury. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;16:332-340.

49 Kaplan PW. Assessing the outcomes in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus: nonconvulsive status epilepticus is underdiagnosed, potentially overtreated, and confounded by comorbidity. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;16:341-352.

50 Vespa PM, Nuwer MR, Nenov V, et al. Increased incidence and impact of nonconvulsive and convulsive seizures after traumatic brain injury as detected by continuous electroencephalographic monitoring. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:750-760.

51 Towne AR, Waterhouse EJ, Boggs JG, et al. Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology. 2000;54:340-345.

52 Dennis LJ, Classen J, Hirsch LJ, et al. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1136-1143.

53 Ruegg SJ, Dichter MA. Diagnosis and treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in an intensive care unit setting. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2003;5:93-110.

54 Liao YJ, So YT. An approach to critically ill patients in coma. West J Med. 2002;176:184-187.

55 Malik K, Hess DC. Evaluating the comatose patient: Rapid neurologic assessment is key to appropriate management. Postgrad Med. 2002;111:38-55.

56 Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: Validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001;286:2703-2710.

57 Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, et al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1481-1483.

58 Ely EW, Siegel MD, Inouye S. Delirium in the intensive care unit: An under-recognized syndrome of organ dysfunction. Semin Resp Crit Care Med. 2001;22:115-126.

59 McGuire BE, Basten CJ, Ryan CJ, et al. Intensive care unit syndrome: A dangerous misnomer. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:906-909.

60 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

61 Lipowski ZJ. Delirium (acute confusional states). JAMA. 1987;258:1789-1792.

62 Rutherford LE, Sessler CN, Levenson JL, et al. Prospective evaluation of delirium and agitation in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1991;19(suppl):S81.

63 Sessler CN, Rutherford L, Best A, et al. Agitation in a medical intensive care unit: Prospective analysis of incidence and risk factors. Chest. 1992;102(suppl):91S.

64 Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R, et al. The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1892-1900.

65 Brenner RP. Is it status? Epilepsia. 2002;43(suppl 3):103-113.

66 Rafanan AL, Kakulavar P, Perl J, et al. Head computed tomography in medical intensive care unit patients: clinical indications. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1306-1309.

67 Bell R, Merli G. Perioperative assessment and management of the surgical patient with neurologic problems. In: Merli G, Weitz H, editors. Medical management of the surgical patient. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1998:283-311.

68 Wijdicks EF, Sharbrough FW. New onset seizures in critically ill patients. Neurology. 1993;43:1042-1044.

69 Herman ST. Epilepsy after brain insult: Targeting epileptogenesis. Neurology. 2002;59(9 suppl 5):S521-S526.

70 Lacomis D, Petrella JT, Giuliani MJ. Causes of neuromuscular weakness in the intensive care unit: A study of ninety-two patients. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:610-617.

71 Hund E. Neurological complications of sepsis: critical illness polymyopathy and myopathy. J Neurol. 2001;248:929-934.

72 De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, et al. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 2002;288:2859-2867.

73 Marinelli WA, Leatherman JW. Neuromuscular disorders in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2002;18:915-929.

74 Metersky ML, Williams A, Rafanan AL. Retrospective analysis: are fever and altered mental status indications for lumbar puncture in a hospitalized patient who has not undergone neurosurgery? Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:285-288.

75 Soulen RL, Duman RJ, Hoeffner E. Magnetic resonance imaging in the critical care setting. Crit Care Clin. 1994;10:401-416.

76 Arbelaez A, Castillo M, Mukherji SK. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of global cerebral anoxia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:999-1007.

77 Parizel PM, Demey HE, Veeckmans G, et al. Early diagnosis of cerebral fat embolism syndrome by diffusion-weighted MRI (starfield pattern). Stroke. 2001;32:2942-2944.

78 Lovblad KO, Bassetti C, Schneider J, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR in cerebral venous thrombosis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11:169-176.

79 Wityk RJ, Goldsborough MA, Hillis A, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted brain magnetic imaging in patients with neurologic complications after cardiac surgery. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:571-576.

80 Sundgren PC, Reinstrup P, Romner B, et al. Value of conventional, and diffusion and perfusion weighted MRI in the management of patients with unclear cerebral pathology, admitted to the intensive care unit. Neuroradiology. 2002;44:674-680.

81 Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Glasgow Coma Scale score. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17:563-571.

82 DeJonghe B, Cook D, Apepere-De-Vecchi C, et al. Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:275-285.

83 Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, et al. Intensive care delirium screening checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:859-864.

84 Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Gnap M, et al. The Richmond agitation-sedation scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1338-1344.

85 Adams HP, Adams RJ, Brott T, et al. Guideline for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:1056-1083.

86 Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, et al. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). JAMA. 2003;289:2983-2991.

87 Simmons LE, Riker RR, Prato S, et al. Assessing sedation during intensive care unit mechanical ventilation with the bispectral index and the sedation-agitation scale. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1499-1504.

88 Gilbert TT, Wagner MR, Halukurike V, et al. Use of bispectral electroencephalogram monitoring to assess neurologic status in unsedated, critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:2036-2037.

89 Mondello E, Siliotti R, Noto G, et al. Bispectral index in ICU: Correlation with Ramsay score on assessment of sedation level. J Clin Monit Comput. 2002;17:271-277.

90 Gupta AK. Monitoring the injured brain in the intensive care unit. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48:218-225.