Splenosis

Published on 05/08/2015 by admin

Filed under Radiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2698 times

 Most common in abdomen/pelvis (65% of cases)

image Usually located within peritoneal cavity (greater omentum, bowel serosa, parietal peritoneum, undersurface of diaphragm)
image Less common locations include thorax (usually after diaphragmatic rupture) and subcutaneous soft tissues
• MDCT: Multiple nodules or masses scattered throughout abdomen or pelvis (usually peritoneal cavity)

image Should follow appearance of spleen on all phases of enhancement
image Slightly hypoattenuating (5-10 HU less) compared to liver on NECT, striated enhancement on arterial phase, and homogeneous enhancement on venous/delayed phases
• MR: Follows appearance and enhancement of normal spleen on all sequences
• Tc-99m heat-denatured RBC scan: ↑ sensitivity/specificity

image ↑ uptake within nodules

TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES

• Peritoneal carcinomatosis
• Accessory spleen
• Polysplenia
• Visceral mass or malignancy
• Peritoneal endometriosis

CLINICAL ISSUES

• Can mimic peritoneal carcinomatosis or primary malignancies on CT and PET
• No other clinical significance in most cases
• Most patients are asymptomatic, but rarely, symptoms are due to hemorrhage, rupture, torsion, infarction, or bowel obstruction
image
(Left) Axial CECT demonstrates absence of the spleen (patient had a history of prior splenectomy for trauma) with small enhancing nodules image in the left upper quadrant. Splenosis is not infrequently seen in close proximity to the splenectomy bed.

image
(Right) Axial CECT in the same patient shows additional splenic implants image along the serosal surface of the left colon and along the posterior margin of the right liver lobe. Splenosis is most commonly seen within the peritoneal cavity, with extraperitoneal splenosis more rare.
image
(Left) Axial CECT in a patient with remote history of abdominal trauma shows multiple soft tissue nodules image along the peritoneal surfaces, which might be mistaken for carcinomatosis, but represent splenosis.

image
(Right) Axial CECT shows an enhancing soft tissue nodule image in the left cardiophrenic angle. The patient had a distant history of traumatic splenic injury with diaphragmatic rupture, the most common reason for thoracic splenosis. Thoracic splenosis is quite rare compared to abdominal/pelvic splenosis.

TERMINOLOGY

Definitions

• Dissemination of splenic tissue into ectopic locations following splenic rupture (either traumatic or iatrogenic)

IMAGING

General Features

• Location

image Most common in abdomen/pelvis (65% of cases)

– Usually located within peritoneal cavity (greater omentum, bowel serosa, parietal peritoneum, undersurface of diaphragm)
– Involvement of extraperitoneal spaces uncommon
image Can occur in virtually every compartment of body

– Less common locations include thorax (usually after diaphragmatic rupture), subcutaneous soft tissues, and even intracranial cavity
• Size

image Few mm to 12 cm; usually < 3 cm
• Morphology

image Round or ovoid nodules; usually multiple

CT Findings

• Multiple nodules scattered throughout abdomen or pelvis
• Nodules follow appearance of spleen on all phases 

image Slightly hypoattenuating (5-10 HU less) compared to liver on NECT, striated enhancement on arterial phase, and homogeneous enhancement on venous/delayed phases

MR Findings

• Follows signal/enhancement of spleen on all sequences
• T1WI: Hypointense to liver; slightly hyperintense to muscle
• T2WI: Hyperintense to liver

Ultrasonographic Findings

• Nonspecific round/oval, homogeneous mass(es)

Nuclear Medicine Findings

• PET

image Splenosis nodules can be FDG avid and mimic neoplasm
• Tc-99m sulfur colloid

image ↑ uptake within splenic nodules (similar to native spleen)
• Tc-99m labeled heat-denatured RBC scintigraphy

image ↑ sensitivity/specificity with ↑ uptake within nodules
image 90% of damaged RBCs are sequestered by splenic tissue

Imaging Recommendations

• Best imaging tool

image Tc-99m labeled heat-denatured RBC scan

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

• History of primary cancer (no history of splenic rupture)
• Usually associated with ascites, omental/peritoneal stranding and nodularity, and known history of underlying malignancy
• Tc-99m-tagged RBC scan is definitive in excluding splenosis

Accessory Spleen

• Congenital ectopic splenic tissue due to failure in fusion of splenic foci during development
• Most cases are small, solitary, and adjacent to splenic hilum
• May hypertrophy after splenectomy and mimic splenosis
• No history of trauma

Polysplenia

• Multiple small spleens associated with abdominal situs inversus and cardiovascular anomalies

Visceral Mass or Malignancy

• Splenosis can mimic pancreatic, adrenal, renal, and gastric masses (and vice versa)

image Splenosis abutting pancreatic tail can mimic neuroendocrine tumor
• CT/MR enhancement characteristics and nuclear scintigraphy helpful in differentiation

Peritoneal Endometriosis

• Soft tissue nodules with variable enhancement usually located in pelvis (uterine ligaments, cul-de-sac, fallopian tubes, etc.)
• No history of trauma

PATHOLOGY

General Features

• Etiology

image Blunt traumatic disruption of splenic capsule with seeding of tissue into peritoneal cavity

– Hematogenous spread may also play a role
image Does not occur after elective splenectomy (no rupture of capsule)

Gross Pathologic & Surgical Features

• Reddish-blue color; no capsule
• Supplied by small perforating vessels from local tissues

image Not supplied by splenic artery branches, unlike splenule

Microscopic Features

• May completely resemble normal splenic tissue

image Cannot differentiate from splenule based on histology
• Distorted architecture with no hilum
• No capsule or poorly formed capsule
• Poorly formed white pulp
• ↓ elastic content

CLINICAL ISSUES

Presentation

• Most common signs/symptoms

image 
• Most are asymptomatic
• Rarely symptomatic due to hemorrhage, rupture, torsion, infarction, or bowel obstruction

Demographics

• Epidemiology

image Most cases reported in adults; M > F (↑ trauma in men)
image ∼ 70% of patients with splenectomy following trauma
image 70% of reported cases suffered trauma during teenage years
image Usually detected years after trauma 

– Mean time after trauma: 10 years; range: 5 months-32 years

Natural History & Prognosis

• No clinical significance in most cases
• Recurrent disease after splenectomy with hematologic disorders (idiopathic thrombocytic purpura, lymphoma, etc.)
• No Howell-Jolly bodies, Heinz bodies, or abnormal RBCs on peripheral blood smear despite splenectomy

image Indicates patient has functioning spleen

Treatment

• In most cases, no treatment is necessary
• Surgical resection only if complications or symptoms are present
image
Axial CECT in a patient with splenosis shows implants in the left upper quadrant image. In an oncology patient, these could easily be mistaken for peritoneal implants of cancer.

image
Axial CECT in a 37-year-old woman shows multiple spherical, soft tissue density masses image throughout the peritoneal cavity. The spleen is absent, with a remote history of blunt abdominal trauma.

SELECTED REFERENCES

1. Diop, AD, et al. CT imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis and its mimics. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014. [ePub].

Yildiz, AE, et al. Splenic anomalies of shape, size, and location: pictorial essay. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013; 2013:321810.

Lake, ST, et al. CT of splenosis: patterns and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199(6):W686–W693.

Fremont, RD, et al. Splenosis: a review. South Med J. 2007; 100(6):589–593.

Gruen, DR, et al. Intrahepatic splenosis mimicking hepatic adenoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168(3):725–726.

Elsayes, KM, et al. imaging of the spleen: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics. 2005 Jul-Aug; 25(4):967–982. [25(4):967-82].

Hagan I et al: heat-denatured Tc-99m red blood cell scintigraphy compared with Tc-99m sulfur colloid scintigraphy. 31(8):463-6, Clin