Spinal Traction

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Last modified 22/05/2015

Print this page

This article have been viewed 1329 times

Chapter 51 Spinal Traction

(Includes Mechanical and Inversion Traction) (Excludes Manual Traction)

OVERVIEW.

Traction is a modality that uses force to elongate soft tissue and separate bone surfaces at the joint. The aim is to address general joint hypomobility, reduce subacute inflammation, treat nerve root impingement, and treat disc herniations.

The proposed mechanisms for traction include (1) gating out pain transmissions, (2) interrupting the pain-spasm cycle, (3) reducing pressure on pain-sensitive structures (reducing the disc’s bulge that compresses a nerve root), and (4) increasing the size of the foramen opening.¹

Traction can be administered mechanically (using an electric motor), manually (using hands), and positionally. Mechanical traction devices typically include an electric motor, a cable, and a harness or device that is secured to the patient’s body. Inversion traction is a special case of positional traction whereby individuals use their own body weight (often hanging upside-down from boots) to exert traction forces on the low back. This section will report on spinal traction applied mechanically or through inversion.¹

SUMMARY: CONTRAINDICATIONS AND PRECAUTIONS.

Ten sources cited a total of 51 concerns for spinal traction. Approximately 40 and 43 concerns are relevant to lumbar and cervical traction, respectively. Concerns ranged from 5 to 29 per source, with a physical therapist citing the greatest number. The largest proportion of concerns was musculoskeletal (24%). Whereas digestive (i.e., hernia, hemorrhoids, peptic ulcer) and respiratory concerns were particular to lumbar traction, TMJ, denture, and C1-C2 stability issues were particular to cervical traction. Overall, the most frequently cited concerns were malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and osteoporosis.

The FDA ² received nine reports of mechanical traction malfunctioning between February 1985 and July 2000 that allegedly have resulted in soft tissue injury, including increased symptoms, pain, and contusions. The devices exceeded the load setting, released cord tension unexpectedly, or fell from an unsecured position.

Notes: (1) Perhaps future published guidelines can emphasize periodic maintenance/calibration of mechanical traction units. (2) Technical note: some source variability may be attributed to regional traction concerns (i.e., cervical versus lumbar).