Spinal cord injury

Published on 12/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2898 times

Chapter 4 Spinal cord injury

Contents

Incidence and aetiology

Data detailed are taken from the summary in De Vivo (2007). The ratio of male to female cases is approximately 3:1, with greater male preponderance in young age groups. Spinal cord damage can be traumatic or non-traumatic. The main causes of traumatic injury are shown in Figure 4.1. Gunshots and stabbings also make small but increasing contributions (Harrison, 2000; Whalley Hammell, 1995). A significant number of patients with mental health problems will sustain injury from jumping from a height. The level of injury at the time of discharge from hospital is illustrated in Figure 4.2.

The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) has produced a classification system for SCI, which is explained below and the classification of injury at discharge is also detailed below (see ‘Diagnosis’).

Non-traumatic aetiology is more common than traumatic. Reported incidence of nontraumatic SCI varies depending on which conditions are included in the study population. Non-traumatic most commonly result from degenerative disc disease and spinal canal stenosis, developmental anomalies (e.g. spina bifida) and congenital anomalies (e.g. angiomatous malformations); inflammation (e.g. multiple sclerosis); ischaemia (e.g. cord stroke); pressure on the cord due to expanding lesions (e.g. abcess or tumour extrinsic or intrinsic to the spinal cord) (New & Sundrajan, 2008). Each condition has distinct management needs and features. Their management will benefit from the knowledge and skills derived from an understanding of traumatic SCI, which is the focus of this chapter.

Types of spinal cord injury

SCI damages a complex neural network involved in transmitting, modifying and coordinating motor, sensory and autonomic control of organ systems. This dysfunction of the spinal cord causes variable loss of homeostatic and adaptive mechanisms which keep people naturally healthy. Any damage to the spinal cord results in deficits that can only be partly predicted, as described below. The pathology of the cord will influence the presenting impairment and the resulting prognosis. It can be precisely correlated with the neurological picture because of the segmental nature of the spinal cord (Kakulas, 2004). Complete transection of the cord is uncommon. It is useful to note that whilst the incidence of SCI in the population as a whole has largely remained the same, the overall prevelence is increasing. There are an increasing number of older people with SCI, reflecting the increasing ageing of the general population, in addition there are more people surviving with SCI into old age (Box 4.1 & Box 4.2).

Over the years there has been a significant reduction in mortality and preservation of neurology in new lesions (Grundy & Swain, 2002; Whalley Hammell, 1995). There are many reasons accounting for this, including:

A previous trend towards increasing incomplete lesions has now lessened. Recent incidence at time of injury has moved closer to equal numbers of incomplete and complete lesions. It is suggested that people with the more serious injuries are surviving, including a higher number of long-term ventilator-dependant patients. It is thought that the accumulative benefits of improved advanced life support and early interventions have now become fully established. It appears that there are no further influences currently increasing the trend towards an incomplete presentation, although the outcomes of new early restorative interventions will be eagerly awaited. There is a significant trend in the reduction in length of stay in the American Model Managed Care Systems, which also reflects a lower Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score at time of discharge and an increase in complications during the first year post discharge (De Vivo, 2007).

Pathogenesis

A brief outline of the pathological changes that occur with SCI is now given; further details can be found in other texts such as Tator (1998).

Spinal cord plasticity

When peripheral nerve is damaged, repair can lead to significant return of function (Battiston et al., 2009; Dahlin, 2008). It has been demonstrated that the central nervous system (CNS) has the capacity to regenerate and recover. It has similarly been hypothesized that there is capacity within the spinal cord to regenerate through a number of mechanisms. Research is ongoing to identify axonal budding, unmasking and interspinal spinal circuits (central pattern generators). For further reading on neuroplasticity see Chapter 11, Adkins et al. (2006), Kleim (2009), and Schwartz and Begley (2003). A summary of research aiming to establish new treatments in the management of spinal cord damage is discussed briefly below.

Diagnosis

Incomplete versus complete injury classification

It is important to clarify these terms, depending on the context in which they are used. From a therapeutic point of view, a patient can be called functionally incomplete when he or she presents with some motor or sensory sparing below the level of the cord lesion. The therapist should acknowledge such sparing as potential activity, which may offer important functional benefits to the patient.

ASIA Impairment Scale

In terms of diagnosis and prognosis, the classification of SCI has important ramifications. The ASIA Impairment Scale (ASIA, 2008) is the latest updated criteria for assessing and classifying functional levels of SCI, including the definitions of complete and incomplete lesions. The assessment is completed with the patient in supine, to enable testing in the acutely unstable injured person. The assessment comprises of 10 key myotomes and 28 dermatomes (Figure 4.3). Each dermatome is tested for light touch and pin prick sensation. The full description for these classifications will not be detailed here and it is available at www.asia-spinalinjury.org, with the impairment scale and classification outlined in Figure 4.4.

image

Figure 4.3 The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Dermatome Chart and Impairment Scale.

American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, reprint 2008; Chicage, Il. Reprinted with permission.

image

Figure 4.4 ASIA classification guide.

American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, reprint 2008; Chicage, Il. Reprinted with permission.

The ASIA system defines that a patient can have neurological sparing below the injury level, but in the absence of the sacral sparing, this is classified as a complete lesion, ASIA A, with zones of partial preservation. Where there is sensory preservation of S4–S5, the patient is classified sensory incomplete, ASIA B. This implies the preservation of the long tracts through the lesion. The classification of incomplete versus complete lesions indicates the presence of sensation in the lower sacral segments S4-S5, which implies significant prognostic indication of potential for neurological improvement. To be classified ASIA C, the patient must be assessed to have preserved S4-S5 sensation and voluntary anal sphincter motor activity. If the voluntary anal activity is absent then there must be preservation of motor function in some muscles innervated more than three levels below the motor classification level. In addition, more than half the key muscles below the neurological level must be grade 1-2/5. Similarly if half the key muscles are grade 3-5/5 then the classification will be ASIA D. The classification of SCI on discharge from hospital is shown in Figure 4.5.

image

Figure 4.5 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification at discharge from hospital.

American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, reprint 2008; Chicage, Il. Reprinted with permission.

From a prognostic point of view, research suggests that 72 hours post injury (Brown, 1994; Maynard et al., 1979), and 1 month post injury are good time points for this classification (Waters et al., 1994a, 1994b). Further assessment is advised at 3 months post injury. All patients are assessed immediately on hospital admission, to gain baseline data. The wealth of prognostic statistics is based on data obtained using these time periods.

Incomplete lesions and prognostic indicators

There are recognized patterns of incomplete cord injury which tend to present clinically as combinations of syndromes rather than in isolation. The signs and symptoms are related to the anatomical areas of the cord affected (Figures 4.6 & 4.7). Clinically, patterns of incomplete lesions are referred to as a syndrome.

Recent statistics show the common patterns of incomplete lesions to be the following:

(McKinley et al., 2007).

Prognosis

Recovery of the incomplete spinal cord injury

It is essential to refer to the evidence of ongoing recovery in SCI and to bear this in mind when treating these patients. Recovery will be at the forefront of a patient’s mind when participating in rehabilitation.

Ninety per cent of incomplete SCI patients have some recovery of a motor level in their upper-limbs, compared to 70–85% of the complete injuries (Ditunno et al., 2000). Pinprick sparing in a dermatome is an excellent indicator of increased recovery of motor strength (Poynton et al., 1997) and it has been found that pinprick preservation below the level of the injury to the sacral dermatomes is the best indicator of useful recovery, with 75% of patients regaining the ability to walk. Fifty per cent of patients who had no sacral sparing regained some motor recovery but not of functional use (Katoh & El Masry, 1995).

Studies have found that incomplete SCI patients showed ongoing improvement in their motor activity, although this tended to slow during the second year post injury, with the exception of incomplete tetraplegics who lacked sharp/blunt discrimination and failed to demonstrate any lower-limb motor recovery. In incomplete paraplegics, there was evidence of 85% of the muscles recovering from a flicker to an antigravity grade within the first year, but if there was no activity initially, only 26% gained an antigravity grade (Waters et al., 1994a, 1994b).

It is widely accepted that incomplete SCI patients will only make useful recovery within the first 2 years post injury, but from the authors’ experiential observation, recovery can continue to occur slowly for at least 5 years or more, particularly in incomplete tetraplegics.

Ambulation recovery

Between 44 and 76% of people with incomplete SCI, with preserved sensation but no motor function, have been reported to achieve ambulation (Maynard et al., 1979; Waters et al., 1994a, 1994b).

Crozier et al. (1991) reported, using ASIA assessment at 72 hours, that 89% of ASIA B–E patients with pinprick preservation went on to ambulate, compared with 11% having preserved light touch but not pinprick.

Acute general management

Although the primary damage is to the spinal cord, every organ system can be affected. Antecedent and posttraumatic psychological and social conditions must also be given full consideration as they play their inevitable parts in the success or failure of rehabilitation. Acute and rehabilitation specialties and disciplines are necessary to provide a holistic approach, in which all team members work towards common goals, agreed between the patient and team.

Trauma management

SCI presentation remains a key issue for all professionals, who should be vigilant about the risks of activities in which they may be involved, such as on rugby fields or at swimming pools.

Immediate management

When an accident occurs involving a SCI, other injuries should be suspected and the incident history recorded; pain, bruising and/or palpable spinal deformity are likely features. This is a crucial time for appropriate management to ensure the best chances possible for survival of the spinal cord fibres.

Proper handling will avoid unnecessary further damage, and the following simple advice can be immensely valuable:

Acute hospital management

Acute trauma management guidelines are well established (Moore et al., 1991). Management of the patient with an SCI has special features resulting from spinal cord shock. Full details are described by Grundy and Swain (2002).

Breathing

Paralysis of respiratory muscles may be a feature. Patients with acute cervical cord injuries can fatigue in their breathing. Pulse oximetry is a crude indicator of respiratory distress because it measures only haemoglobin saturation and not partial pressure of oxygen (Po2) (Hough, 2001). Any evidence of desaturation or of falling saturation should be proactively addressed by the critical care team to maintain oxygenation and prevent further cord damage. Monitoring patients’ breathing rate, pattern and colour, and noting agitation, drowsiness or distressed behaviour, is vital. Arterial blood-gas analysis may be the critical factor in deciding whether to provide ventilatory support. Respiratory failure remains one of the main causes of death in acute tetraplegia, whilst pneumonia is the leading cause of death in all persons with SCI (Jackson et al., 1994). The principles of respiratory management are covered in Chapter 15.

Spinal cord shock

This is the phenomenon of cessation of nervous system function below the level of damage to the cord and may be due to the loss of descending neural influences. It is usually expected that after several seconds to months, the flaccid paralysis and areflexia of spinal shock are replaced by hyperexcitability, seen clinically as hyperreflexia, spasticity and spasms. More recently this has been identified as a critical period when the timing of potential interventions can influence recovering neurological systems. Studies have shown that there is competetive synaptic growth into the synaptic spaces that have been vacated. These transient vacant sites become open to repopulation by spared axons. It is at this moment that interventions should ideally target synapse growth mediating voluntary movement rather than local segmental neurons mediating spasticity and hyperreflexia (Ditunno et al., 2004; McDonald et al., 2002).

Stauffer (1983) noted that it is rare to see patients in total spinal shock and totally areflexic. Strong spasticity almost immediately post injury is indicative of an incomplete SCI. In these patients assessment of voluntary movement requires careful differentiation. In the authors’ experience, development of increased muscle tone and involuntary movements may mislead patients to believe they have functional return of activity. It is important for the therapist to anticipate such reactions and to assess carefully in order to avoid confusion and disappointment.

Spinal stabilization versus conservative management

Spinal fractures may be classified as stable, unstable or quasistable (i.e. currently stable but likely to become unstable in the course of everyday activity). Disagreement continues between protagonists and antagonists of surgical stabilization of the spine, but surgery is increasingly used (Collins, 1995).

Definition of instability or stability of a spinal lesion has now achieved substantial agreement based on the three column principles (Dennis, 1983). There is general agreement that restoration of the anatomy of the canal is sensible in terms of giving the cord the best opportunity for recovery.

It is debated whether neurological recovery or degree of spinal stability in the long term differs with surgical or conservative management. Surgery aims to minimize neurological deterioration, restore alignment and stabilization, facilitate early mobilization, reduce pain, minimize hospital stay and prevent secondary complications (Johnston, 2001). Review of evidence over the last decade does not identify any specific timing or role for early surgical decompression. Surgical intervention within the first 72 hours after injury has been shown to be safe and a role for urgent decompression has been identified in certain circumstances and may improve neurological outcomes (Fehlings & Perrin, 2006).

From a physiotherapy and psychological point of view, the ability to mobilize a patient against gravity early seems to be a desirable outcome from surgery. This can be achieved by 7–10 days after surgery and results in a shorter inpatient stay.

Special problems in spinal cord injury

Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a loss in bone mass without any alteration of the ratio between mineral and the organic matrix. A text by (Jiang et al., 2006) provides a comprehensive overview of osteoporosis. It is thought that immobilization for long periods and a sedentary life lead to an increase in bone reabsorption, thus causing osteoporosis.

Rapid loss of bone minerals occurs during the first 4 months following SCI. A range of data available from studies include: at 1 year bone mass density reduces in the femoral neck by 27%, mid femoral shaft by 25% and distal femur by 43%. The reduction continues in the pelvis and lower limbs over the 10 years after injury and can reduce by 50%. Tetraplegics can lose up to 16% on their bone mass density in their upper limbs. The osteoporosis may cause fractures of long bones during relatively simple manoeuvres, such as transfer or passive movements (Belanger et al., 2000). The rate of incidence of fractures has been documented to be 1% in the first year post injury, 1.3% per year at 1–9 years, 3.4% per year at 10–19 years, 4.6% per year at 20–29 years (Jiang et al., 2006).

It has been shown that early mobilization with weight bearing might prevent or slow bone-mineral loss (De Bruin et al., 1999). Bone mineral density can be preserved in bones below the level of the lesion (Frey-Rindova et al., 2000). The question is frequently asked whether a patient who has not stood for several years should recommence standing. There is a variety of opinion on how to proceed, either returning straight to standing or commencing a weight-bearing programme using a tilt table, usually combined with bone-enhancing agents, and monitoring using bone densitometry, before returning to standing in a frame. Such advice is empirical and, as yet, despite many studies, no clear guidance has been produced.

Heterotopic ossification

Calcification in denervated or UMN-disordered muscle remains an ill-understood process and commonly occurs in patients with SCI (David et al., 1993). It may be confused in the early stages with deep venous thrombosis, when it presents as swelling, alteration in skin colour and increased heat, usually in relation to a joint. During the active process, analysis of plasma biochemistry shows a raised alkaline phosphatase. It can result in loss of range of movement (ROM) and difficulty in sitting. If ossification occurs around the hips it may lead to further skin pressure problems. Treatment of this condition is discussed by David et al. (1993). It must be emphasized that stretching should be gentle, as overstretching may be a predisposing factor for this condition.

Fertility

Fertility is usually maintained in women, with the ovulatory cycle being normal within 9 months after injury. Fertility in men is, however, a problem (Brindley, 1984). Improvements in fertility rates for men after SCI have been made due to several important technical advances. These include improved methods in the retrieval and enhancement of sperm, such as electroejaculation, and improved means of achieving fertilization with limited sperm quality and numbers through in vitro techniques.

Acute physical management

In the early post-injury phase, physical management will mainly involve prevention of respiratory and circulatory complications, and care of pressure areas. As spinal shock starts to resolve, other physical sequelae must be addressed, such as pain, weakness and hyperreflexia leading to hypertonus and contracture.

Objective
Muscle strength: standard muscle chart (MRC, 1978) (Oxford grading scale and ASIA Chart (2002))
Commonly used measurement tools

FVC, forced vital capacity.

Respiratory management

Effect of cord injury on the respiratory system

Respiration is a complex motor activity using muscles at various levels (see below). Patients with lesions of T1 and above will lose some 40–50% of their respiratory function, but most patients with cervical injuries have an initial vital lung capacity of only 1.5 litres or less. Thus, all patients with cervical injuries should be fully evaluated for respiratory efficiency by monitoring spirometry and Po2 in the initial weeks after injury. For an overview of respiratory physiology with an explanation of the tests mentioned here and normal values, the reader is referred to relevant textbooks (e.g. Hough, 2001; Smith & Ball, 1998).

Given the aetiology of SCI, many patients sustain associated injuries affecting respiration. Lung contusion or pneumo- or haemopneumothorax is common in patients with thoracic lesions, often associated with steering-wheel impact. They present at 24–48 hours post injury with deteriorating respiratory function, with a falling Po2 and rising Pco2. This is a serious development and mechanical ventilation may be required, occasionally for a number of weeks.

In other patients, deterioration of respiratory function in the first days after injury may be associated with an ascending cord lesion of two to three spinal levels, due to oedema or extending hypoxia in the cord or possibly due to fatigue. This again may lead to the need for mechanical ventilation for a period and then subsequent weaning from the ventilator as cord function returns. Occasionally the higher ascended level may become the permanent level. If significant hypoxia persists, particularly with associated low blood pressure, further damage to the cord may occur. These patients do improve their respiratory capacity with respiratory training (see below).

Atelectasis is common in patients with SCI. Subsequent infection and pneumonia still account for considerable morbidity and some mortality in tetraplegics. Prophylactic tracheostomy is often advised to assist in effective clearance of secretions. High cervical injuries are prone to bronchospasm and bronchial hypersecretion due to disrupted sympathetic response. Appropriate treatment with bronchodilators in conjunction with manual techniques will be required to maintain adequate ventilation (see Ch. 15). Chest and head injuries are commonly associated with spinal injury and provide their own respiratory problems, which must also be assessed and treated appropriately (see Ch. 3).

30–50% Low cervical 20% Upper cervical 5–10%

FVC, forced vital capacity.

Forced vital capacity

The forced vital capacity (FVC) is a readily available objective measurement of respiratory muscle function, as is peak expiratory flow rate. As mentioned earlier, it is used acutely to monitor respiratory status. If the FVC is less than 1 L, the therapist may choose to instigate either intermittent positive-pressure breathing (IPPB), e.g. the Bird respirator, or bilevel intermittent positive airway pressure (BIPAP), as discussed by Hough (2001). This assisted ventilation can be used prophylactically to maintain and increase inspiratory volume and aid clearance of secretions. It is a useful adjunct to active manual techniques for patients with sputum retention and lung collapse, and can be used to administer bronchodilators (Pryor & Webber, 1998). Elective ventilation is normally undertaken if the FVC falls below 500 ml but may be considered in some patients if FVC is around 1 L, depending on other complications that can impair the active cycle of breathing.

In cases of severe pain from rib fractures and associated soft-tissue injuries, a mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen (Entonox) may be used and, if applicable, entrained into the IPPB circuit. Trancutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has also been found to be effective in assisting pain management (see Ch. 12).

Breathing exercises and respiratory muscle training may also include the use of IPPB and incentive spirometry in the acute phase. Evidence to support the use of these modalities is inconclusive; however, from the experience of the authors they have been found to be beneficial adjuncts to manual treatments.

Cough

A patient with a lesion above T6 will not have an effective cough as he or she will have lost the action of the abdominal muscles. The physiotherapist can compensate for this loss by the use of assisted coughing, in order that the patient can clear secretions (Bromley, 2006). The Emerson Cough Assist Insufflator-Exsufflator is used to produce a cough by introduction of positive pressure then withdrawing negative pressure via a facemask, in order to assist secretion clearance.

Precautions in treating unstable spinal cord injury

These precautions in treating unstable SCI are outlined in Box 4.4 (CSP, 1997) and are for guidance only. They are widely accepted in many centres, but the point 2 lacks clear evidence to support this guidance. In a recent informal survey there was no agreement nationally or internationally, amongst the spinal surgeons questioned, to determine whether it is necessary to hold down the patient’s shoulder (termed a shoulder hold) during some treatment techniques. There are some centres that advocate that the patient’s head is stabilized and their shoulders held down onto the bed, whilst leg movements are performed and during chest physiotherapy. This stabilization is also recommended when moving the shoulders above 90°, particularly if the patient has high levels of spasticity.

Acute respiratory care and management of complications

If no other respiratory complications are present, the physiotherapist will teach prophylactic breathing exercises to encourage chest expansion and improve ventilation. Incentive spirometry is useful for patients with mid thoracic lesions and above, to give the patient and family positive feedback during breathing exercises. Care is necessary to maintain the stability of the spine. It is advised that shoulders are held for patients with unstable lesions of T4 and above when performing an assisted cough. In these circumstances, bilateral techniques should always be used in order to maintain spinal alignment. Adapted postural drainage for an unstable lesion is performed using specialized turning beds that maintain spinal alignment.

Active assisted facilitation of movement and passive movements

As the majority of SCI patients have an incomplete injury, it is important to facilitate and utilize any active movement available. During the acute phase, whilst the patient is immobilized in bed, the physiotherapist can assist in exploiting the potential for functional return. Where patients have any active movement they should be encouraged to participate in activity and it should be purposeful if possible.

In order to produce a remembered coordinated movement pattern during assisted movements, attempts should be made to position joint girdles in functional alignment, prior to moving the limbs. During a period of sustained bed rest, an SCI individual’s body schema, the internal three-dimensional, dynamic representation of the spatial and biomechanical properties of one’s body, is lost from the parietal area of the brain. This means that the different joints of the body are not clearly identified during movement. On attempting a functional activity, the individual cannot differentiate the different parts of a movement resulting in an abnormal mass pattern. Care should be taken to activate each joint movement to achieve the maximum outcome possible and feed into the preparation of the body for the changes in postural adjustments resulting from voluntary movement (Mouchnino et al., 1992; Schepens et al., 2008).

Cortical mapping has demonstrated change, by the performance of passive movements with the patient visualizing the movement and in the presence of some sensory feedback (Reddy et al., 2001).

Splints may be used to provide joint support and maintain joint range of movement and muscle length. This may be essential in reducing joint pain, providing stability during movement and preventing contracture. It can also be argued that splinting may hinder activity by ‘dulling’ afferent input due to blanket sensation and restriction of movement.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a useful adjunct to improve a movement where only a flicker is first available (see Ch. 12). Similarly, electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback can assist the patient to move in the absence of full sensation (see Ch. 12). The aims of all such movements are to:

Movements are commenced immediately after injury and features specifically important for SCI patients are now discussed. Shoulder movements are usually performed at least twice a day and leg movements once a day, in order to monitor any return of movement. For lumbar and low thoracic fractures, hip flexion should be kept to below 30°, to avoid lumbar flexion, until stability is established. Knee flexion must, therefore, be performed in Tailor’s position, i.e. ‘frogging’ (Figure 4.8).

Special emphasis should be put on the following:

Where there is no active flexion of the fingers and thumb, it is appropriate to allow shortening of the long flexors. The ROM of individual joints at the wrist, fingers and thumb must be maintained. When the wrist is actively extended, the fingers and thumb are pulled into flexion to produce a functional ‘key-type’ grip, the tenodesis grip. If this contracture does not occur naturally, it can be encouraged by splinting whilst in the acute phase.

During recovery, the handling principles apply to facilitate normal movement and not to elicit spasm and reinforce the spastic pattern. Extreme ROM must be avoided, especially at the hip and knee, as microtrauma may be a predisposing factor in the formation of periarticular ossification (see above). Passive movements of paralysed limbs are continued until the patient is mobile and thus capable of ensuring full mobility through his or her own activities, unless there are complications, such as excessive spasm or stiffness. See Box 4.5 for key points in acute management.

A complication that may occur over the few days after injury and remain a risk for some months is the development of pulmonary emboli associated with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Prophylactic measures, including frequent passive movement, wearing pressure stockings and early mobilization, are important. The use of antithrombolytic agents has become mandatory. Extreme vigilance with regard to leg size and other signs of DVT by all team members is important, as there is a 1–2% incidence of mortality from massive pulmonary embolus each year.

Turning and positioning/tone management

Whilst managed on bed rest patients will require frequent turning. Turning charts can be used to assist staff with a regimen over each 24-hour period, to avoid pressure-marking of anaesthetic skin and offering an opportunity to check skin tolerance. This regimen can be used in conjunction with postural drainage positions. Turning beds can be used to reposition a patient, and the choice of bed depends on the individual unit’s policy.

Upper-limb positioning of the tetraplegic patient is very important during bed rest. Incomplete cervical lesions are particularly prone to shortening of soft tissues due to muscle imbalance, resulting in partial shoulder subluxation and pain.

Waring and Maynard (1991) reported that 75% of tetraplegics had shoulder pain, 60% lasting 2 weeks or more. Of the patients with pain, 39% had unilateral and 61% bilateral symptoms. In over one-third, onset was within the first 3 days postinjury and 52% within the first 2 weeks postinjury. Pain may result from muscle imbalance, spasticity, and direct trauma to the shoulder girdle, combined with the joint immobilization, central and peripheral sources of nerve pain.

Patients who are delayed in the initiation of shoulder exercises beyond 2 weeks post injury are significantly at risk of shoulder pain.

Scott and Donovan (1981) described special positioning to prevent loss of range: 90° abduction, combined with other positioning techniques, leads to decreased frequency and severity of shoulder pain.

Positioning is used to minimize spasticity similarly to patients with other conditions. When the patient is exhibiting mass muscle tone in flexion or extension, the limbs and trunk may be placed into reflex-inhibiting positions. Some examples of positioning are shown in Figures 4.8 and 4.9. Positioning is also discussed in Chapter 14 and by Pope (2002).

Antispasmodic agents may be prescribed at this stage to assist in the management of high tone and reduce the complications of contracture. Botulinum toxin can be injected into specific muscles to offer the opportunity to gain muscle length, reduce pain and improve joint range of movement. This is particularly useful in the management of shoulders, as they are vulnerable to problems of pain and impingement, resulting from muscle imbalance and hypertonicity in the shoulder girdle musculature.

Rehabilitation

The following section outlines management from the start of the mobilization phase through to discharge. Much of this information has been gained from the authors’ experience; procedures may vary between centres but the principles are similar (Bromley, 2006; Whalley Hammell, 1995).

Objectives of rehabilitation

The progression of objectives as the patient gains more ability is outlined below. These objectives need to be set in relation to the level of spinal injury and the appropriate functional goals (Table 4.3). These expectations for function, depending on level of SCI, can only be a guide, especially in the light of the prevalence of incomplete lesions.

Key elements of the rehabilitation process are considered below.

Pain management

Pain can be a problem initially during movements, notably due to neurodynamics, which is impairment of movement and/or elasticity of the nervous system (Shacklock, 2005). Chronic pain is a common problem in SCI. Between 65 and 85% of patients will experience significant pain and one-third of these will be classified as severe. A modern classification of pain following spinal cord injury has been proposed by Siddall (2009). This divides pain into nociceptive and neuropathic. Nociceptive is subdivided into musculoskeletal and visceral, whilst neuropathic is divided into above, at level and below level. The comprehensive review paper by Siddall (2009) goes on to describe the mechanisms of neuropathic pain and its management with sections on general principles, surgical approaches, pharmacological options, neurostimulation, and psychological and environmental management. With such a wide range of approaches it is clear that none are uniformly successful in pain control. Further research into management systems, with particular emphasis on cognitive systems, is proceeding.

Spasticity

SCI patients presenting with an upper motor neurone syndrome will exhibit both negative and positive symptoms. Spasticity will be a feature in this patient group, presenting a challenge in all aspects of patient management (Satkunam, 2003). It is a very large subject and requires more consideration than this chapter allows (see Ch. 14). Spasticity is difficult to define and more recently is described as a sensori-motor phenomenon related to the integration of the nervous system motor responses to sensory input. It is related to the hypersensitivity of the reflex arc resulting from the loss of descending inhibition (Ivanhoe & Reistetter, 2004). A further definition states that the disordered sensory-motor control presents as intermittent or sustained involuntary activation of muscles (Pandyan et al., 2005).

In incomplete cord lesions, depending on the pattern, spasticity tends to occur earlier and may present immediately. When severe, it will inhibit any underlying voluntary movement and create ‘wrong’ synaptic connections in the recovering nervous system. In complete spinal cord lesions, it most commonly becomes apparent about 3 months after the injury. It tends to reach a maximum between 6 and 12 months after injury and then diminishes, becoming more manageable. However, in a minority it remains at a high level and presents a major problem affecting function, posture and joint movement (Sheean, 1998).

A moderate amount of spasticity will assist with standing transfers, maintain muscle bulk, protect the skin to some extent and may contribute to prevention of osteoporosis. It is when the spasticity is excessive that problems occur.

Spasticity management

The management of spasticity should be undertaken by a coordinated multidisciplinary team rather than by clinicians in isolation (Barnes et al., 2001). Spinal cord spasticity presents in different patterns to that usually seen in stroke patients (Ch. 2).

The best management is prevention in the first few months after injury (Ditunno et al., 2004). Essentially in the first few days the opportunities for functional connections should be maximized.

It is also important to avoid triggering factors, such as urinary tract infection, constipation or skin breakdown. A collaborative assessment and evaluation tool to determine the best management of spasticity in SCI patients is currently being developed to accompany the document by Barnes et al. (2001).

The main medical approach is through pharmacology, although none of the drugs commonly used (baclofen, dantrolene and tizanidine) is universally effective or indeed predictable in its effect. Nerve blocks have been used for many years, usually using either phenol or alcohol. All of the above drugs have significant and numerous side-effects (see Martindale, 2007). An Intra thecal baclofen pump system can be used to deliver the baclofen directly into the spinal fluid. A small refillable pump is inserted under the skin delivering a regular treatment dose to maintain reduced levels of spasticity. As the use of intramuscular botulinum toxin increases, the use of other nerve blocks will diminish.

Surgery has some place in treatment, in the form of tendon release and nerve divisions, e.g. obturator neurectomy. These techniques can be successful, particularly where the procedure has been carried out for hygiene and posture reasons.

Functional mobility

Standing programme

Care must be taken when initiating standing. The autonomic disturbance present in patients with cervical and thoracic injuries can result in significant problems with hypotension which in the early stages may affect cord perfusion. Blood pressure studies and monitoring of pressures in sitting and gradual tilt table standing have been suggested (Kassioukov et al., 2009). These problems will usually resolve as the venous return improves.

Bone loss after SCI is greatest in the lower limbs. There is some evidence, although limited, to support standing by any means can improve preservation of bone mass density in the femoral shaft and proximal femur of complete SCI individuals (Goemaere et al., 1994). However the early weight-bearing mobilization of patients might be important in preventing or slowing the bone mineral loss after injury (de Bruin et al., 1999). In practice tilt table standing is commenced as soon as possible. This has many other benefits: respiratory psychological and improved systemic body functions. Standing is of great value in retaining neuromuscular flexibility and in reduction of spasticity (Bohannon & Larkin, 1985; Eng et al., 2001; Goemaere et al., 1994; Golding, 1994).

An abdominal binder and compression stockings are recommended for patients with lesions of T6 and above. Once the patient can stand with no ill effect, progression is made to a standing frame, e.g. Oswestry Standing Frame (OSF), working up to standing for 1 hour, three times a week. Patients with lesions of C5 and below should be capable of standing into a hoist-assisted OSF. There are many standing systems commercially available which will lift the patient into a standing posture. Some wheelchairs also offer this facility. Whilst standing, trunk balance work can be re-educated, for example, removing hand support, throwing and catching a ball. Once good balance is achieved, the paraplegic patient may go on to develop gait with orthoses or actively.

There has been a variety of studies to identify the time and regularity necessary for a patient to stand. It is suggested that the amount of time will influence the reduction in spasticity and at least half an hour every day is recommended (Walter et al., 1999).

Strengthening and cardiovascular fitness

The rehabilitation process incorporates components of strengthening and fitness, as part of restoration of function. An average SCI patient is eight times less active than a middle-aged sedentry man. Wheelchair users have an increased risk of secondary disabilities such as coronary heart disease, obesity, hypertension and diabetes (Finley et al., 2002). The changes in muscle function resulting from SCI lead to reduced energy expenditure and decreased strength.

Patients are motivated to achieve their physical goals in a variety of ways. Fitness training using adapted equipment is useful, e.g. an arm-powered ergonomic bike may be used for endurance. Wheelchair circuits and advanced skills are encouraged. Hydrotherapy can lead on to swimming, an enjoyable activity that can improve cardiovascular fitness. The emphasis on education for patients and the establishment of an ongoing fitness programme for SCI individuals has become a priority within the Spinal Cord Injury Centres.

The value of sports activities cannot be underestimated, even for those people who did not enjoy sports previously. The known benefits of group or sports activities translate into the rehabilitation process. Patients will often sustain an activity for much longer when engaged in a sport.

There are many charities and organizations available to promote these opportunities and to support equipment funding for SCI individuals. Activities can eventually progress to more competitive sports and clubs, as well as encouraging attendance at the many fully integrated fitness centres available. Cardiovascular fitness after SCI has been reviewed (Finley et al., 2002; Jacobs & Nash, 2001) and in general for neurological conditions in Chapter 18.

Functional electrical stimulation in restoration of function and gait

Research and technologies have influenced our clinical practice, e.g. body weight support treadmill gait training (Figure 4.11) is based around the central pattern generator (CPG) theory (see below). Research to incorporate FES with this training is underway. In the future methods that use the concept of activity-dependent neuroplasticity will most likely play an increasing role in the rehabilitation of SCI.

FES and its role in functional activities and gait requires further evaluation. A comprehensive review by Ragnarsson (2008) identifies the current state-of-the-art and future therapeutic potential. It has been used as a neuroprosthesis in activities of daily living (ADL) to restore upper-limb function. Surface FES systems that aim to assist paraplegic patients to walk are already approved in the USA – Parastep System (Sigmedics, Inc., IL, USA) and for incomplete injuries the Odstock Drop Foot Stimulator is widely used. The implanted devices for foot drop have been developed and are curently being used in clinical practice (Chae et al., 2000).

Despite promising advances in technology, the physiological limitations of the neuromuscular system prohibit the clinical use of FES alone to achieve a realistic and successful functional outcome. Gait remains inefficient, needing high energy levels. It has been demonstrated that function achieved through an external locus of control will always be of limited value to patients (Bradley, 1994). The recent research is seeking to provide cortical patterns of activity to trigger the stimulation for movement (Grill et al., 2001).

Some patients choose to use FES to maintain muscle bulk for cosmesis and others to maintain bulk or leg circulation for reduction of pressure over bony areas. Patients who are very slim with bony prominences are predisposed to pressure marking and the maintenance of muscle bulk by FES can help to reduce this problem and allow them to sit for longer in their wheelchair.

Ongoing respiratory management

Tetraplegic and some high thoracic paraplegic patients will benefit from ongoing respiratory monitoring and from respiratory training. Respiratory capacity is impaired by motor weakness, spasticity and pain. Inspiratory muscle-training devices provide resistance through a variety of devices or valves. Some studies have demonstrated some limited benefit for improving FVC (Hough, 2001; Van Houtte et al., 2006). More recently devices have been developed to produce training through the ‘Test of Incremental Respiratory Endurance (TIRE) protocol. This system produces inspiratory muscle training working at 80% of the maximum performance (Figure 4.12). The visual display provides a goal-orientated programme for the individual to try to beat during each exercise session (www.trainair.co.uk).

image

Figure 4.12 Respiratory Training Device.

(From TRAINAIR, Inspiratory Muscle Training, with permission.)

Wheelchairs

The variety of wheelchairs available increases each year, including some that enable the patient to rise into standing. Initially, patients are mobilized in a standard wheelchair offering greatest support and stability, following a comprehensive assessment to ensure it is correctly fitted and adjusted. Adaptations are made to provide a well-supported, evenly balanced seating position (Harvey, 2008; Pope, 2002). Tension adjustable canvas systems and modular backrests are all valuable in producing postural control.

The key to good stability is achieved by support and alignment at the pelvis. The cushion is equally important and should be assessed in a similar way, also taking into account the need for protection of pressure areas. Various pressure assessment tools are used to evaluate skin viability when sitting and these aid cushion prescription (Barbenel et al., 1983). Later in rehabilitation, it will be appropriate to try a variety of wheelchairs to offer greater mobility and independence according to an individual’s needs. In view of the incidence of shoulder pain in wheelchair users (Ballinger et al., 2000), it is appropriate to consider adaptations and weight of the wheelchairs. There are many light-weight wheelchairs available and the use of assisted wheeling systems can ease the effort of wheeling. A battery-powered third wheel or trike adaptation can be fitted onto the front of a light weight manual wheelchair to provide assisted mobility outdoors.

Rehabilitation of incomplete lesions

The management of the incomplete patient presents many challenges, not least because experience has shown that the expected outcomes are unknown. This can affect the psychological adjustment of the patient and, as physical changes extend over many years, may delay patients in moving on with their life.

Emphasis is placed on managing muscle imbalance, spasticity and tone, and sensory loss. As incomplete lesions present with a wide range of loss of functional activity, treatment will depend on the level of disability and specific physical problems.

Treatment may include: facilitation of normal movement patterns; muscle strengthening (see Ch. 18); addressing muscle imbalance and compensations; and inhibition of spasticity (see Ch. 14). Balance re-education, gait re-education, wheelchair skills and functional activities are performed as appropriate to the patient’s level of ability.

Research suggests that patterned neural activity may be an important mechanism for developing and maintaining inhibitory circuitry (McDonald et al., 2002). There have been many studies exploring gait facilitation using a partial weight-bearing system on the treadmill. This approach is based on the principles of CPGs and repeated exercise of gait motion to increase strength, coordination and endurance (Ladouceur et al., 1997). There is evidence from animal studies that neural networks in the isolated spinal cord are capable of generating rhythmic output (reciprocally organized between agonists and antagonists) in the absence of efferent descending and movement-related afferent sources (Duysens & Van de Crommert, 1998). This is postulated to be similar in humans. Spinal systems contribute to the control of locomotion by local segmental and intersegmental spinal circuits (Grillner & Wallen, 1985).

In normal walking, it has been shown that muscle activity patterns are not centrally generated by reflex-induced activity, e.g. through stretch reflexes (Prochazka et al., 1979). The gait facilitation on the treadmill system is thought to be influenced by three main sensory sources acting on the CPGs:

Some outcome measures being assessed as evaluation tools for this work in the national spinal injuries centres are: Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI; Ditunno et al., 2000) and WISCI II (Ditunno et al., 2001).

There have been concerns from physiotherapists against gait exercise too early, causing the development of ‘wrong patterns’. The motion of the hip is helped by the harness so as to move almost entirely within normal range limits. Therapists helping to guide foot placement manually found this an effective way of controlling motion and blocking abnormal harmful patterns. FES has been introduced as an adjunct to assist with the gait pattern (see Ch. 12). The advantages of this gait training would be to improve systemic functions and stimulate the vegetative nervous sequelae. Early training with some weight-bearing may help reduce osteoporosis and patients have been shown to need less support after training (Abel et al., 2002).

Questions remain if this treatment is effective: is progress due to other factors, e.g. muscle plasticity or spontaneous recovery, or can the cord learn from the increased demands of loading the limbs? The supraspinal and afferent influences on the cord are not yet understood in humans.

Patients with LMN damage require early diagnosis and may benefit from acute surgical and later restorative interventions, and also provision of orthoses to accommodate for the weakness.

Assisted gait, calipers and orthoses

During rehabilitation, the patient may be assessed for suitability for walking with orthoses. Depending on the fracture, gait training will normally commence about a year after surgery, or earlier if no fixation surgery was indicated or if the patient is incomplete. There should be surgical review on an individual basis. Some patients may require a temporary orthosis during their recovery.

It should be recognized that, even if a patient has the ability to walk with calipers, he or she may not choose to or may be advised not to try. Techniques used for gait training have been discussed in detail by Bromley (2006) and an outline of the progression of training is given below.

The gait-training process is physically demanding and requires commitment. Criteria which should be considered include:

Experience has shown that many patients complete their training with calipers, only to discard them a few months or years later as walking has become too much effort. Wheelchair use may be preferable, as the hands are free for functional activities whereas they are not when walking with calipers.

The long-term ventilated patient

Increased survival of patients with high lesions is now expected, especially in the young. Resettlement into the community requires domiciliary ventilation and a complex care package.

Once past the acute phase, their individual needs are ascertained. Specialized wheelchairs are available which can be mouth- or head-controlled. Prophylactic chest management is vital, with tracheostomy, regular bagging and suction to reduce atelectasis and prevent infection (see Ch. 15). FES for the abdominal muscles has been evaluated as a method to assist coughing (Linder, 1993).

Non-invasive ventilation may be appropriate for some patients and some others may be candidates for diaphragmatic pacing. Usually those with lesions above C3 are most successful. Lesions of C4 segmental level tend to have involvement of the anterior horn and cannot be stimulated, as stimulation relies on an intact lower motor neuron system.

Assessment involves nerve conduction studies and may include fluoroscopic examination to visualize diaphragmatic excursion (Zejdlik, 1992). Electrodes are placed around the phrenic nerve either in the thorax or neck. An external pacing box is attached to external transmitter antennae; these are placed over the implanted receivers and when stimulated provide diaphragmatic contraction (Buchanan & Nawoezenski, 1987). There is no set regime for training but some patients have managed to achieve 24-hour pacing. Others use the ventilator part-time.

Initially, physiotherapy will aim to maximize strength in all innervated muscles to assist in head control and strengthen accessory respiratory muscles. Glossopharyngeal breathing techniques and use of a biofeedback training system can allow the patient to manage for short periods off the ventilator. Regular tilt table standing is recommended in addition to passive movements. Management of spasticity is also an important consideration (see Ch. 14) and may involve medication.

The aim for these patients is to achieve verbal independence and control of their environment. Technology offers systems linked to computerized environmental controls, operated by a head or mouth control, or voice-activated.

Children with spinal cord injury

The number of children with spinal cord damage which is non-congenital is thankfully quite low. Numbers vary between studies but a study gives an example that less than 2% of children admitted with all forms of traumatic injury have an SCI (Brown et al., 2001). Traumatic causes are mostly traffic accidents and falls.

In very young children, the head is proportionally larger and heavier and, therefore, injuries are commonly cervical. The range of maximum flexion of the cervical spine tends to move lower as the child gets older (Grundy & Swain, 2002). The review provided by Vogel and Anderson (2003) offers a comprehensive overview of the management of children with SCI. Other texts include Osenback and Menezes (1992) and Short et al. (1992).

Special considerations for children with SCI include the following:

Discharge plan, reintegration and follow-up

The process of rehabilitation and reintegration is complex, involving many agencies and resources. The development of the case management process has helped to coordinate the complex process of discharge into the community. The patient thus has an advocate to complement the core rehabilitation team, providing support in overcoming functional difficulties and liaise with the various organizations and authorities throughout rehabilitation.

In the UK 74% of patients are discharged to their own home, the remainder to an interim placement, residential or nursing care or a local hospital (SIA, 2009).

On discharge all patients will require further close follow-up and reassessment, which may involve the community teams. Ideally this will be a multidisciplinary review to maintain continued support, monitor physical wellbeing and facilitate reintegration. During rehabilitation, patients are introduced to groups and organizations, such as SIA and Back Up, who can offer social and peer support and leisure activities, whilst also providing advisory role, to assist in the reintegration process.

A home visit is made by the occupational therapist and community team and may include school or workplace. The physiotherapist may be involved to assess mobility issues. If home adaptations or rehousing are not completed but the patient is ready for discharge, transfer to an interim placement may be necessary.

Preparation for discharge begins at the beginning of rehabilitation, in order to facilitate a supported process. From the authors’ experience, we know that many incomplete patients with UMN and LMN lesions go on to make functional recovery past the quoted time of 2 years. As physiotherapists, we can ensure this opportunity is not lost and real qualitative changes can be made. The economic implications are strongly argued when someone can be kept mobile and carer input reduced. We must encourage utilization of all treatment modalities and equipment available.

Patients will need ongoing follow-up and may require later-stage interventions, such as tendon transfer and implant surgery to restore function (mentioned previously). The spinal injuries unit should be available as a resource back-up when any complications or problems arise.

Case Study

Clinical reasoning in a case for later intervention more than 2 years post spinal cord lesion.

Patient: JG (date of birth 1975)

Pathology

Treatment progression summary

References

Abel R., Schablowski M., Rupp R., Gemer H.J. Gait analysis on the treadmill – monitoring exercise in the treatment of paraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:17-22.

Adkins D.L., Boychuk J., Remple M.S., et al. Motor training induces experience-specific patterns of plasticity across motor cortex and spinal cord. J. Appl. Physiol.. 2006;101(6):1776-1782.

American Spinal Injuries Association (ASIA). International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, reprint 2008. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injuries Association, 2008.

Ballinger D.A., Rintala D.H., Hart K.A. The relation of shoulder pain and range of motion problems to functional limitations, disability and perceived health of men with spinal cord injury: a multifaceted longitudinal study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 2000;81:1575-1581.

Barbenel J.C., Forbes C.D., Lowe G.D.O. Pressure Sores. London: Macmillan Press, 1983.

Barnes M., Bhakta B., Moore P., et al. The Management of Adults with Spasticity using Botulinum Toxin. A Guide to Clinical Practice. Byfleet: Harvard Health, 2001.

Battiston B., Papalia I., Tos P., Geuna S. Peripheral nerve repair and regeneration research. Int. Rev. Neurobiol.. 2009;87:1-7.

Belanger M., Stein R.B., Wheeler G.D., et al. Electrical stimulation:can it increase muscle strength and reverse osteopenia in spinal cord individuals? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 2000;81(8):1090-1098.

Birch R. Management of brachial plexus injuries. In: Greenwood R., Barnes M.P., McMillan T.M., et al, editors. Neurological Rehabilitation. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:587-606.

Bohannon R.W., Larkin P.A. Passive ankle dorsiflexion increases in patients after a regime of tilt table-wedge board standing. A clinical report. Phys. Ther.. 1985;65:1676-1678.

Bohannon R.W., Smith M.B. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys. Ther.. 1987;67:206-207.

Bradley M. The effects of participating in a functional electrical stimulation exercise programme on affect in people with FES. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 1994;75:676-679.

Brindley G.S. The fertility of men with spinal injury. Paraplegia. 1984;22:337-348.

Bromley I. Tetraplegia and Paraplegia, sixth ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2006.

Brown P. Pathophysiology of spasticity. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1994;57:773-777.

Brown R.L., Brunn M.A., Garcia V.F. Cervical spine injuries in children: a review of 103 patients treated consecutively at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. J. Pediatr. Surg.. 2001;36:1107-1114.

Buchanan L.E., Nawoezenski D.A. Spinal Cord Injury Concepts and Management Approaches. London: Williams & Wilkins, 1987.

Burns A.S., Ditunno J.F. Establishing prognosis and maximizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26:S137-S145.

Catz A., Itzkovich M., Tesio L., et al. A Multicentre international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:275-291.

Chae J., Kilgore K., Triolo R., et al. Functional neuromuscular stimulation in spinal cord injury. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am.. 2000;11:209-226.

Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP). Standards of Physiotherapy Practice for People with Spinal Cord Lesions. London: CSP, 1997.

Crozier K.S., Groziani V., Ditunno J.F., et al. Spinal cord injury, prognosis for ambulation based on sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 1991;72:119-121.

Collins W. Surgery in the acute treatment of spinal cord injury: a review of the past forty years. J. Spinal Cord Med.. 1995;18:3-8.

Curtis K.A., Tyner T.M., Zachary L., et al. Effect of a standard exercise protocol on shoulder pain in long term wheelchair users. Spinal Cord. 1999;37:421-429.

Dahlin L.B. Techniques of peripheral nerve repair. Scand. J. Surg.. 2008;97(4):310-316.

David O., Sett P., Burr R.G., et al. The relationship of heterotopic ossification to passive movements in paraplegic patients. Disabil. Rehabil.. 1993;15:114-118.

Davis G.M., Hamzaid N.A., Fornusek C. Cardiorespiratory, metabolic and biomechanical responses during functional electrical stimulation leg exercise: health and fitness benefits. Artif. Organs.. 2008;32(8):625-629.

Dennis F. Three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine. 1983;8:817-831.

De Bruin E.D., Frey-Rindova P., Herzog R.E., Dietz V., Dambacher M.A., Stussi E. Changes of tibia bone properties after spinal cord injury: effects of early intervention. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 1999;80(Suppl. 2):214-220.

De Troyer A., Estenne M. The Respiratory System in Neuromuscular Disorders. In: Roussos C., editor. The Thorax: Disease Edition: Part C. Marcel Dekker; 1995:2177-2317.

De Vivo M.J. Trends in spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcomes from Model systems in the United States; 1973-2006. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:713-721.

Ditunno J.F., Young W., Donovan W.H. The International Standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1994;32:70-80.

Ditunno J.F., Ditunno P.L., Graziani V., et al. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI). An international multi centre validity and reliability study. Spinal Cord, 38. 2000: 234-243. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:654-656. Revision: (WISCI II)

Ditunno J.F., Little J.W., Tessler A., et al. Spinal shock revisited: a four-phase model. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:383-395.

Duysens J., Van de Crommert H.W.A.A. Neural control of locomotion: Part 1: The central pattern generator from cats to humans. Gait Posture. 1998:131-141.

Eng J.J., Levins S.M., Townson A.F., et al. Use of prolonged standing for individuals with spinal cord injuries. Phys. Ther.. 2001;81(8):1392-1399.

Fawcett J.W., Curt A., Steeves J.D., et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(3):190-205. Epub 2006 Dec 19 (Review)

Fehlings M.G., Perrin R.G. The timing of sugical intervention the treatment of acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review of clinical evidence. Spine. 2006;31(Suppl. 11):S28-S35.

Finley M.A., Rodgers M.M., Keyser R. Impact of physical exercise on controlling secondary conditions associated with spinal cord injury. Neurology Report. 2002.

Foo D. Spinal cord injury in forty four patients with cervical spondylosis. Paraplegia. 1986;24:301-306.

Fowler C.J., Fowler C.G. Neurogenic bladder dysfunction and its management. In: Greenwood R., Barnes M.P., McMillian T.M., et al, editors. Neurological Rehabilitation. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:269-277.

Frey-Rindova P., de Bruin E.D., Stussi E., et al. Bone Moneral density in Upper and Lower Extremities during 12 months after spinal cord injury measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(Suppl. 1):26-32.

Giangregorio L., McCartney N. Bone Loss and Muscle Atrophy in Spinal Cord Injury: Epidemiology, Fracture Prediction and Rehabilitation Strategies. J. Spinal Cord Med.. 2006;29(5):489-500.

Goemaere S., Van Laere M., De Nerve P., et al. Bone mineral status in paralegics patients who do not perform standing. Osteoporos. Int.. 1994;4:138-143.

Golding J.S. The mechanical factors which influence bone growth. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.. 1994;48(Suppl. 1):S178-S185.

Grill W.M., McDonald J.W., Peckham P.H., et al. At the interface: convergence of neural regeneration and neuroprostheses for restoration of function. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.. 2001;38:633-639.

Grillner S., Wallen P. Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.. 1985;8:233-261.

Grundy D., Swain A. ABC of Spinal Cord Injury, fourth ed. London: British Medical Journal Publications, 2002.

Hamilton B.B., Granger C.V. A Rehabilitation Uniform Data System. New York: Buffalo Publications, 1991.

Harrison P. The First 48 Hours. London: Spinal Injuries Association, 2000.

Harvey L. Management of Spinal Cord Injuries. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2008.

Hough A. Physiotherapy in Respiratory Care: An Evidence Based Approach to Respiratory Management and Cardiac Conditions, third ed. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes, 2001.

Hossain M., McLean A., Fraser M.H. Outcome of halo immobilisation of 104 cases of cervical spine injury. Scott. Med. J.. 2004;49(3):90-92.

Illis L.S. Spinal Cord Dysfunction Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

Ivanhoe C.B., Reistetter T.A. Spasticity: The misunderstood part of the upper motor neuron syndrome. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 2004;83(Suppl.):S3-S9.

Jackson A.B., Groomes T.E. Incidence of respiratory complications following spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 1994;75(3):270-275.

Jacobs P.L., Nash M.S. Modes, benefits and risks of voluntary and electrically induced exercise in persons with spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Cord Med.. 2001;24:10-18.

Jiang S.-D., Dai L.-Y., Jiang L.-S. Osteoporosis after a spinal cord injury. Osteoporos. Int.. 2006;17:180-190.

Johnston L. Human spinal cord injury: new and emerging approaches to treatment. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:609-613.

Kakulas B.A. Neuropathology: the foundation for new treatments in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(10):549-563.

Kassioukov A., Eng J.J., Warburton D., Teasell R. A Systematic Review of the Management of Orthostatic Hypotension after Spinal Cord Injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 2009;90(5):876-885.

Katoh S., El Masry W.S. Motor recovery of patients presenting with motor paralysis and sensory sparing following cervical spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1995;33:506-509.

Kleim J.A. Lennon S., Stokes M., editors. Pocketbook of Neurological Physiotherapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. 2009:41-50.

Ladouceur M., Pepin A., Norman K.E., et al. Recovery of walking after spinal cord injury. Adv. Neurol.. 1997;72:249-255.

Lammertse D., Tuszynski M.H., Steeves J.D., et al. International Campaign for Cures of Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial design. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(3):232-242. Epub 2006 Dec 19 (Review)

Linder S.H. Functional electrical stimulation to enhance cough in spinal cord injury. Chest. 1993;103:166-169.

Little J.W., Habur E. Temporal course of motor recovery after Brown Séquard spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1985;23:39-46.

Martindale: the complete Martindale: the complete drug reference, thirtyfifth ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press. 2007.

Mc Donald J.W., Becker D., Sadowsky M.D., et al. Late recovery following spinal cord injury. J. Neurosurg. (Spine2). 2002;97:252-265.

McKinley W., Santos K., Meade M., et al. Incidence and outcomes of spinal cord injury clinical syndromes. J. Spinal Cord Med.. 2007;30(3):215-224.

Maynard F.M., Reynolds G.G., Fountain S., et al. Neurological prognosis after traumatic quadraplegia, three years experience of California Regional Spinal Cord Injury Care System. J. Neurosurg.. 1979;50:611-616.

Medical Research Council (MRC) of the United Kingdom. Aids to Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System. 1978. Memorandum No 45. Palo Alto, Calif: Pedragon House

Moore E.E., Mattox K.L., Feliciano D.V. Trauma, second ed. Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1991.

Mouchnino L., Aurenty R., Massion J., et al. Coordination between equilibrium and head-trunk orientation during leg movement: a new strategy build up by training. J. Neurophysiol.. 1992;67(6):1587-1598.

New P.W., Sundrajan V. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:406-411.

Osenback R.K., Menezes A.M. Paediatric spinal cord and vertebral column injury. Neurosurgery. 1992;30:385-390.

Pandyan A.D., Gregoric M., Barnes M.P., Wood D., Van Wijck F., Burridge J., Hermens H., Johnson G.R. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil. Rehabil.. 2005;27:2-6.

Pope P.M. Postural management and special seating. In: Edwards S., editor. Neurological Physiotherapy: A Problem Solving Approach. second ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:189-217.

Poynton A.R., O’Farrel D.A., Shannon F., et al. Sparing of sensation to pinprick predicts motor recovery of a motor segment after injury to the spinal cord. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.. 1997;79:952-954.

Prochazka A., Stephens J.A., Wand P. Muscle spindle discharge in normal and obstructed movements. J. Physiol.. 1979;287:57-66.

Pryor J.A., Webber B.A. Physiotherapy for Respiratory and Cardiac Problems, second ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1998.

Ragnarsson K.T. Functional Electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury; current use, therapeutic effects and future direction. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:255-274.

Ramer M.S., Harper G.P., Bradbury E.J. Progress in spinal cord research. A refined strategy for the International Spinal Research Trust. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:449-472.

Reddy H., Floyer A., Donaghy M., et al. Altered cortical activation with finger movements after peripheral denervation: comparison of active and passive tasks. Exp. Brain Res.. 2001;138(4):484-491.

Ronsyn M.W., Berneman Z.N., Van Tendeloo V.F.I., et al. Can cell therapy heal a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:532-539.

Satkunam L.E. Rehabilitation medicine: 3. Management of adult spasticity. Can. Med. Assoc. J.. 2003;169(11):1173-1179. Review

Scott J.A., Donovan W.H. The prevention of shoulder pain and contracture in the acute tetraplegia patient. Paraplegia. 1981;19:313-319.

Schepens B., Stapley P., Drew T. Neurons in the pontomedullary reticular formation signal posture and movement both as an integrated behavior and independently. J. Neurophysiol.. 2008;100(4):2235-2253.

Schwartz J.M., Begley S. The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force. New York: Harper Collins, 2003.

Shacklock M. Clinical Neurodynamics: a new system of musculoskeletal treatment. London: Elsevier Health, 2005.

Sheean G., editor. Sasticity Rehabilitation. London: Churchill Communications Europe, 1998.

Short D.J., Frankel H.L., Bergström E.M.K. Injuries of the Spinal Cord in Children. London: Elsevier Science, 1992.

Siddall P.J. Management of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury; now and in the future. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:352-359.

Spinal Injuries Association (SIA). Preserving and developing the national spinal cord injury service. London: Spinal Injuries Association, 2009. Research report May 2009

Smith M., Ball V. Cardiovascular/Respiratory Physiotherapy. London: Mosby, 1998.

Stauffer E.S. Rehabilitation of posttraumatic cervical spinal cord quadraplegia and pentaplegia. In: The Cervical Spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1983.

Steeves J.D., Lammertse D., Curt A., et al. International Campaign for Cures of Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(3):206-221. Epub 2006 Dec 19 (Review)

Stokes E.K. Outcome measurement. In: Lennon S., Stokes M., editors. Pocketbook of Neurological Physiotherapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2009:192-201.

Tator C.H. Biology of neurological recovery and functional restoration after spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:696-707.

Tuszynski M.H., Steeves J.D., Fawcett J.W., et al. International Campaign for Cures of Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial inclusion/exclusion criteria and ethics. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(3):222-231. Epub 2006 Dec 19 (Review)

Van Houtte S., Vanlandewijke Y., Gosselink R. Respiratory muscle training in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Respir. Med. 2006.

Vogel L.C., Anderson C.J. Spinal Cord Injury in children and adolescents: a review. Spinal Cord Med.. 2003;26(3):193-203.

Waring W.P., Maynard F.M. Shoulder pain in acute traumatic quadraplegia. Paraplegia. 1991;29:37-42.

Waters R.L., Adkins R.H., Yakura J.S., et al. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 1994;75:67-72.

Waters R.L., Adkins R.H., Yakura J.S., et al. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 1994;75:306-311.

Walter J.S., Sola P.G., Sacks J., et al. Indications for a home standing program for individuals with spinal cord injury. J. Spinal Cord Med.. 1999;22(3):152-158.

Whalley Hammell K. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. Canada: Chapman & Hall, 1995.

Whiteneck G.G., Charlifue S.W., Gerhart K.A., et al. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.. 1992;73:519-526.

Williams P. Gray’s anatomy, thirtyeighth ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1995.

World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. Available online at: http://www.who.int/classification/icf

Zejdlik C.P. Management of Spinal Cord Injury, second ed. Boston: Jones & Bartlett, 1992.