CHAPTER 32 Sphenoid Wing Meningiomas
INTRODUCTION
Meningiomas arising in the sphenoid region are frequently encountered in neurosurgical practice. They account for 11% to 18% of cases in large surgical series.1–6 Presumably radiation-induced sphenoid meniningiomas have been described.7,8 Jacobs and co-workers have reported a nonrandom association between sphenoid meningiomas, breast cancer, and genital cancer.9 Other than that, there are no data implicating specific causes or genes and genetic pathways specifically in the formation of sphenoid wing meningiomas.10 Epidemiologists have generally not distinguished between meningiomas occurring at different sites.11,12
Sphenoid meningiomas (and other meningiomas of the anterior skull base) may be more often of the meningiothelial than the transitional or fibroblastic histologic subtype possibly reflecting a lesser rate of NF2 gene disruptions in these tumors.13 Histologically malignant and atypical tumors of the sphenoid have been reported, but histologically aggressive meningioma variants are less frequently observed in the cranial base than the convexity.14 Overall, meningiomas more commonly affect women. This is particularly true for meningiomas en plaque of the sphenoid wing. Between 77% and 94% of these growths are diagnosed in females (Table 32-1).
This chapter describes the surgical treatment of meningiomas of the sphenoid wing and its results.
CLASSIFICATION OF SPHENOID MENINGIOMAS
Growth patterns of sphenoid meningiomas reflect the complicated anatomy detailed in the preceding text and may therefore vary considerably. On the end of the spectrum of sphenoid meningiomas are some tumors of the lateral sphenoid wing (or the pterion; see earlier) which closely resemble convexity meningiomas in most aspects of clinical presentation and surgical treatment (Fig. 32-1). On the other hand, many tumors of the medial sphenoid wing are typical skull-base tumors infiltrating into skull-base structures. The proximity of vital and eloquent neurovascular structures such as the carotid artery and its branches and the optic apparatus (Figs. 32-2, 32-3, and 32-4) can pose formidable surgical challenges. Sometimes, tumors not only infiltrate the dural layer but also may grow into the cavernous sinus itself. Orbital involvement and extracranial growth in the subcranial region is a prominent finding in certain sphenoid meningiomas (spheno-orbital meningiomas). Bone invasion and hyperostosis usually associated with en plaque growth along the underlying dura are a characteristic finding in spheno-orbital meningiomas (Figs. 32-5 through 32-8). Excision of the dural origin of the tumor is generally required for a permanent cure of meningiomas.15 This can be regularly achieved when operating on lateral sphenoid wing tumors. In contrast, tumor growth into the cavernous sinus, orbital tumor extensions, and even carpet-like involvement of the convexity dura (see Fig. 32-8) encountered in tumors of the middle and inner thirds of the sphenoid wing may prevent a truly complete and radical resection.
FIGURE 32-3 Medium-sized medial sphenoid wing meningioma.
This tumor was diagnosed in a 39-year-old woman after a seizure. Visual acuity and visual fields were normal. Please compare Figure 32-4 for the corresponding intraoperative findings.
FIGURE 32-4 Surgery for a medium-sized meningioma of the left medial sphenoid wing. Please compare Figure 32-3 for radiologic findings.
I, After decompression of the optic nerve, the dural tumor origin in the region of the anterior clinoid process is removed. There was no tumor growth extending medially or into the optic foramen. Much of the dural sign in this region (compare Fig. 32-3A, upper panel) was found to correspond to neovascularization and not tumor during surgery.
FIGURE 32-5 Bilateral spheno-orbital meningioma.
A, CT scans showing the bony involvement.
B, T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI scans depicting bilateral bone and soft tissue involvement.
(From Ringel F, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Microsurgical technique and results of a series of 63 spheno-orbital meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2007;60(4 Suppl 2):214-21.)
FIGURE 32-6 Orbital involvement in spheno-orbital meningiomas.
(From Ringel F, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Microsurgical technique and results of a series of 63 spheno-orbital meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2007;60(4 Suppl 2):214-21.)
FIGURE 32-7 Intraosseous tumor growth and secondary bone formation in spheno-orbital meningiomas.
(From Ringel F, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Microsurgical technique and results of a series of 63 spheno-orbital meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2007;60(4 Suppl 2):214-21.)
A simple classification of sphenoid meningiomas will distinguish between medial and lateral sphenoid wing meningiomas and spheno-orbital (hyperostosing or en plaque) meningiomas.16–22 The first classification of sphenoid meningiomas was proposed by Cushing.23 Based on different growth patterns, site-dependent symptomatology, and site-specific surgical issues, Cushing and Eisenhardt distinguished between meningiomas of the deep or clinoidal third, those of the middle, and those of the outer (pterional) third of the sphenoid ridge (i.e., the ala magna). Cushing felt that early symptomatic involvement of the optic apparatus, oculomotor palsies, and exophthalmos, and the surgical challenges posed by the vicinity of the carotid artery, the superior orbital fissure, and the pituitary stalk, serve to distinguish tumors of the deep from tumors of the middle sphenoid ridge. The latter may often become sizable growths before they are diagnosed. Pterional meningiomas are thought to either grow en plaque or as sometimes rather large spherical (globular) tumors.
A somewhat more refined classification has been proposed by Bonnal and colleagues and Brotchi and Pirotte.24,25 These authors distinguish between five groups of sphenoidal meningiomas. Cushing’s clinoidal tumors are referred to as group A tumors. Invasion of the cavernous sinus is listed as one characteristic of these growths. Meningiomas en plaque with hyperostosis of the sphenoid bone often invade large parts of the sphenoid bone, the optic foramen and orbit, and even the infratemporal fossa and fossa pterygopalatina (see Figs. 32-6, 32-7, and 32-8). Hence their designation as pterional tumors as proposed by Cushing may not be fully appropriate. These tumors are termed group B meningiomas by Bonnal and colleagues and Brotchi and Pirotte. Large invasive tumors of the sphenoid ridge (“invasion en masse”) are classified as group C tumors. They are thought to combine features of both group A and B tumors: globular and invasive growth en plaque. Group D and E meningiomas correspond to Cushing’s middle sphenoid ridge and globular pterional tumors.
Basso and colleagues subdivide meningiomas of the inner third of the sphenoid wing into clinoidal and sphenocavernous tumors.21 Nakamura and co-workers and Russel and Benjamin also classify medial sphenoid wing meningiomas into tumors with or without cavernous sinus involvement.22,26 Among sphenoid wing meningiomas with growth into the cavernous sinus, Abdel-Aziz and colleagues further distinguish among sphenocavernous, clinoidocavernous, and sphenoclinoidocavernous meningiomas.27 Clinoidal meningiomas may also be subclassified based on the presence (or absence) of interfacing arachnoid membranes between the tumor and cerebral vessels28 and, in addition, tumor size.29
Roser and colleagues described a subset of 86 cases of sphenoid wing meningiomas with osseous involvement among a total of 256 sphenoid wing meningiomas. They distinguish between globular tumors of the lateral, middle, and medial sphenoid wing with osseous infiltration, en plaque meningiomas with and without cavernous sinus invasion, and finally purely intraosseous tumors.30 Honeybul and co-workers also differentiate between invasive en plaque and purely intraosseous sphenoid meningiomas.31
Irrespective of the classification one chooses to subdivide one’s case series, when planning an operation it is important to distinguish among the types outlined by Roser and colleagues,30