Special circumstances and considerations

Published on 24/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Psychiatry

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1217 times

6 Special circumstances and considerations

6.1 How can families come to terms with the illness?

There is no doubt that manic depression is a very serious, long-term illness that has a major impact on both the sufferer and the family. It puts enormous strain on close relationships and many families have been permanently ruptured by its effects. Each family finds its own way of coming to terms with the illness although there are some themes that often emerge.

Bipolar illness is usually outside of most people’s experience and it is easy to mistake the signs of the illness for other problems, such as delinquency or drunkenness or just plain stupidity. It is often only much later that these behaviours can be recognised as symptoms of manic depression. Reacting to an illness is different to reacting to other problems because of the issue of responsibility. Most of us would consider our partner or adult children to be responsible for their behaviour if they are getting into arguments, losing their job or getting drunk. However, if this is because they are manic then we would think that they are less responsible for their behaviour and we would give them more leeway, tend to ignore it but focus instead on getting appropriate help and treatment. Shifting from blaming the person to blaming the illness is a major shift in attitude.

However, the next step that is often reached is how much is the person who has the bipolar illness responsible for keeping themselves well and how much falls to the family? These issues usually revolve around the patient taking medication appropriately and taking care of themselves in terms of alcohol or illicit drugs and other aspects of lifestyle.

The other tension is that the patient will generally resent everything about the way they behave being put down to their illness, so that effectively anything they say or do which is at all out of the ordinary is dismissed as a symptom of their illness.

These issues are very similar to those that occur in adolescence as parents grapple with giving their children independence to do what they want, whether it is the right thing or not!

The accusation that ‘you’re treating me like a child’ is commonly heard. Finding the right balance at the right time is never perfectly achieved but can only be approached if both sides are able to be honest about what they think and feel. The right approach in one circumstance and in one stage of the illness may be entirely wrong in another, but finding this flexibility is very difficult. It is also easy to react with anger (on both sides) and want to walk away but this rarely works well, though occasionally is exactly right!

There are other aspects of the illness that families have to grapple with including the loss of hopes and dreams for the patient and for themselves and others in the family. Taking a realistic look at the illness and how much it will affect everyone’s lives is hard as there is a lot of uncertainty, particularly in the early years. Some will tend to go down a path of denial, and this is an aspect of thinking that most families go through at some point. They may either ignore what has happened or just hope that it will not happen again. Alternatively, they may move to the other extreme and assume that normal life is now entirely over. Keeping a realistic view of the future is important, and revising it as events unfold is part of that.

6.3 Do manic depressives have cognitive or intellectual deficits?

When Kraepelin made the distinction between manic depression and schizophrenia a hundred years ago, he did it partly on the basis that there was cognitive impairment among the schizophrenic group. In fact the name he gave to the illness we now call schizophrenia was dementia praecox. This comes from the Latin, meaning a precocious or premature dementia. It is certainly true that a major disability for those who suffer from schizophrenia is an impairment of their intellectual function. The situation for bipolars is less clear.

Before the symptoms of the illness start it is commonly found, among those with schizophrenia, that their school performance has been below average. This does not seem to apply to bipolars and in fact they are likely to be somewhat above average.

It is easy to recognise the intellectual impairments of severe depression, particularly when it is accompanied by retardation where even the most basic of mental tasks (e.g. getting a few words out) is difficult. The distractibility of mania also precludes clear and effective thinking. However, when there has been a good recovery from mania and depression, is there any cognitive impairment still present? At first sight there is not, but when detailed tests of intellectual function are undertaken then abnormalities emerge. Bipolars as a group do not have the severe impairments that those with schizophrenia show but they still do not equate to normal controls. It may be that this is part of the explanation for why those with manic depression often do not seem to be doing as well at work as would be expected even though they have made a good recovery in terms of being free of manic or depressive symptoms.

There are no particular tests that bipolars are especially likely to perform poorly on that can be easily tested in the surgery and in fact the differences between bipolars and normal controls tend to be matters of degree rather than categorical differences. It is also worth remembering that even minor levels of symptoms can have a substantial effect on intellectual function and this needs to be borne in mind when considering treatment.

6.5 Do complementary treatments have a place?

Where the line between mainstream and complementary treatment is drawn is uncertain. We are still not sure what forms of ‘talking’ therapies are effective (see Qs 3.20 and 5.46) and many people find less specialist forms of talking useful, from non-directive counselling to assertiveness training and anger management.

6.6 How does the stigmatisation of mental illness affect manic depressives?

Stigma means a mark of social disgrace. It is a form of prejudice that means making negative assumptions about people. It has a major impact on those who experience mental illness including those with manic depression. The common views are that they have brought the illness on themselves and that they are likely to be dangerous and violent.

There are also some rather paradoxical ideas–for example thinking that depression is a sign of weakness and that people should just ‘pull themselves together’ while at the same time thinking that nothing can be done to improve mental illnesses and therefore it will permanent. These views are so common and pervasive that many people with the illness will also share those ideas and so not think that it is worth bothering trying to get some help or treatment (see also Q 5.44).

The other view that people who have bipolar illness commonly hear is–‘You don’t seem like the type of person to suffer from depression’–which chimes with the idea that only certain people can experience mental illness (see Q 1.18).

The practical effect of stigma is that people are not given a chance to show what they can or cannot do–it’s just assumed that they are incapable. It is also very corrosive to someone’s self-esteem to be dismissed on the basis of assumptions about their illness.

Obviously manic depression does have a disabling effect on everyone that experiences it and it can lead to extreme, bizarre and unpredictable behaviour. This is part of the illness and needs to be faced and tackled head on, although stigma does exaggerate the disability.

Education about the illness and getting to know people who suffer from manic depression seem to be the only ways to reduce stigma. Learning about the reality of bipolar disorder and the ordinariness of those who experience it can change attitudes. One of the most powerful ways that stigma can be tackled is by prominent people letting it be known that they suffer from manic depression. In the United States, Ted Turner, who founded CNN (the news network), made it public that he suffered from the illness. In the UK, Spike Milligan was not only open about his illness (Case vignette 6.1) but also became patron of the Manic Depression Fellowship.

imageCASE VIGNETTE 6.1 TACKLING STIGMA

Spike Milligan is one of the few people in the UK to have been open about his manic depression. If you are familiar with his comedy you might think that his main problem was mania but in fact like most bipolars it was depression that really dogged him. At least some of his writing was driven by his manic or hypomanic symptoms but he said that his comic genius was not worth the manic depression agony.

Spike had a family history of depression in his mother who was depressed after his birth. He had a difficult childhood with his mother’s problems and his father being away in the army. He spent his early years in India and found it a shock to return to a cold and harsh pre-war England.

He joined the army in World War II and fought for 4 years in North Africa and Italy before being wounded in a mortar attack. Following this he was ‘weepy, frightened, lethargic and ill’. He was treated with tranquillisers and after a week was sent back–‘Up to the guns and as soon as I heard them go I started to stammer’. He was withdrawn from frontline service.

As a young man he was prone to mood swings, ‘fast and joking’ at times but ‘low and lacking drive’ at others.

He developed his career after the War, particularly as the writer of The Goon Show in the 1950s. He seemed to do this in a frenzy of activity with at times very little sleep in an intense and highly productive 6 years. Towards the end of this time he was probably manic but he collapsed into depression and was admitted to hospital.

Over the following years he had several admissions to hospital and his depressions were long and debilitating. His illness was severe enough to require treatment with ECT. Mania was not a prominent part of his illness but he seems to have used his manic energy productively.

He died in 2002, and the epitaph he chose for his gravestone reads: ‘I told you I was illRsquo;.

His manic humour is revealed in the way that he played with words and ideas–for example ‘This is Minnie Bannister, the world-famous poker player–give her a good poker and she’ll play any tune you like.’

6.9 What is self-management?

Everyone with a serious chronic illness needs to find a way to understand and manage that illness so that the disabling effect on their life is minimised.

The term ‘self-management’ has been used by the Manic Depression Fellowship (MDF, see Appendix 1) for this process of gaining more control over the condition. The MDF is a national self-help organisation in the UK. They promote this process of taking more responsibility for one’s own condition through literature, self-help groups and a national training course.

There are a number of elements in self-management:

Being an informed and insightful patient is undoubtedly one of the best routes to long-term mental stability for those with bipolar illness.

6.10 What is the interaction between the medications used in treating bipolar illness and alcohol?

imageMany of the drugs used to treat bipolar disorder have sedative effects; this is true not only of the antipsychotics and benzodiazepines but also the anticonvulsants, particularly carbamazepine. Alcohol tends to enhance these sedative effects and can also exaggerate other CNS side-effects, such as ataxia. There is no direct interaction with lithium unless alcohol is drunk to the level of causing dehydration which can raise lithium levels.

Some antidepressants, particularly trazodone and the sedative tricyclics such as amitriptyline and dosulepin (dothiepin), are also likely to enhance drowsiness when taken with alcohol. SSRIs are generally less sedative and the interaction is likely to be less.

Doctors often feel in a dilemma when discussing alcohol use with people who suffer from manic depression. Patients need to have information about interactions but doctors do not want to be seen to encourage alcohol as so many patients have problems with excessive drinking. Most longer term medications do not prevent drinking modest amounts of alcohol. There is an element of trial and error because individuals vary in their tolerance of alcohol and medicines. Patients will usually find that they can tolerate a moderate amount of alcohol in combination with their medication.

Heavy restrictions on alcohol are difficult to comply with as so much social life revolves around drinking alcohol and most of us like to drink. If patients feel doctors have unrealistic views about alcohol then they probably will not be frank about their alcohol use.

On the other hand, it is easy to collude with excessive drinking and if you can help someone tackle a common problem early then you are doing them a real favour. Discussions that help them to explore non-alcohol-related avenues of social contact, or even experimenting with not drinking, can be useful lines to follow. But one needs to stay realistic as alcohol use is so pervasive in our culture that even when people do get involved with other activities (e.g. playing squash), they find that they are expected to go and have a drink afterwards!

6.11 What is the effect of bipolar illness on work?

Those who are acutely ill with depression or mania will usually be too disabled to work, either because their concentration and attention are not sufficient or their judgement is poor. In the longer run it is disappointing to see that only about a quarter of manic depressives seem to be able to maintain work at a level at which their qualifications and experience would suggest they are capable. The reasons for this include the direct effects of the illness on the ability to work and the attitude of others. The disruptions that acute episodes of illness can cause are the most obvious effect. Manic episodes that involve embarrassing and irresponsible behaviour can prove very disruptive to working relationships that thrive on trust. Even after recovery from an acute episode low level depressive symptoms are common and this can impact on the motivation and innovation that productive work requires. Some people have mild cognitive deficits which prevent them performing at the level that would be expected, even if they have apparently made a good recovery from their mood symptoms. Many patients feel that the medications they are taking are affecting their cognitive ability or their enthusiasm or creativity. These are aspects of medication that are not well described or investigated and it is very difficult to disentangle effects of medications from long-term symptoms.

The attitude of employers makes an enormous difference; those that are sympathetic, often because they have had emotional problems themselves, can be enormously helpful in promoting achievement at work. More commonly employers can prove very negative and obstructive and really prevent people who have made a good recovery from returning to work. Those who will allow patients to test out their abilities by coming back to work on a gradual basis, both in terms of responsibility and time, usually get the best out of those with bipolar illness. However, in jobs that require a high degree of responsibility and independence, including medicine, it is often difficult to put into place the required supervision and monitoring that would enable people to practise effectively and safely.

It is easy for people with bipolar illness to take very low key jobs in an attempt to avoid stress and because their self-esteem is poor. Unfortunately boring jobs can prove just as stressful as more responsible ones. Try to encourage people to find a way of making a reasonable assessment of their abilities, perhaps by asking a colleague who knows them well. Those with bipolar illness should aim to work to the best of their abilities rather than assume that they have to go for a job with lower expectations.

6.12 What are the rules on driving?

Doctors need to make an assessment of the fitness of a patient to drive at that particular time and give consideration to the longer term. Those who are acutely ill with mania or depression should not drive because of judgement and concentration problems and they need to be told this. This assessment can be very obvious when people are severely ill but is much harder to judge at milder levels of illness. Doctors need to consider not only the level of illness at the time the patient is seen, but also their recent behaviour. The account of others such as family and their view of the risk can be very informative. Also consider whether the illness is likely to get worse as judged by the severity of previous episodes and, if the illness is settling, that sufficient time is allowed to be confident that there will not be a relapse.

Driving can be such an important part of life, particularly for those who live in more rural areas where public transport is limited, that doctors are loath to prevent driving. However, this needs to be balanced by the risks that driving entails. Patients are far more likely to injure themselves or someone else in the course of their driving than they are because of direct violence.

The author’s usual rule is to consider people fit, even if they have had a severe episode, if they have made a good recovery, which has been sustained for 3 months, and as long as the medication they are taking is not interfering with their ability to drive. This judgement is usually made on the basis of observations and the report of the patient, and again making use of a relative if this is possible.

All patients with manic depression should be encouraged to contact the licensing authorities. In the UK the way to do this is set out on the driving licence documents. Patients should give the authorities the names of doctors who can provide evidence about their fitness to drive. Tell patients that this is a legal requirement and that their licence is not valid, and neither is their insurance, if they have not informed the authorities of any serious illness which includes manic depression. This has the advantage of not only being true but putting some independent decision making into the process rather than you being the sole arbiter.

Doctors also have to make judgements along with patients on the effects of medication and most of the medications used in bipolar illness can impair attention and concentration and so driving ability. This is often particularly true when the treatment is started. Particular care should be taken about benzodiazepines which are commonly found in the blood of those involved in car accidents. Many patients think that taking the medicine is what is stopping them driving whereas it is usually the opposite: it is regular compliance with treatment that is necessary for them to be fit to drive regularly again.

6.13 Are manic depressives more creative than other people?

Both mania and depression do lead to people thinking about themselves and their situation in different ways from those of us who have never experienced these extremes of mood. This insight can certainly be used creatively but the usual barrier to this is the difficulty in concentration and motivation which is so much a part of acute manic depressive illnesses. The increased energy of hypomania can improve productivity and the combination of fast thinking and distractibility can lead to innovations in thinking and ideas. Several famous poets, novelists and artists have suffered extremes of mood, particularly depression, which some think is linked to their creativity (Jamison 1994). Schubert is the composer who is often cited as a classic example of a manic depressive whose levels of productivity and creativity varied dramatically from year to year according to his mood state.

On the other hand, the sad truth is that most people who suffer from manic depression have their creativity badly stifled by the illness so that productive work and family life are curtailed because of the disruption of the illness. Creative people come in all different shapes, sizes and temperaments and it is doubtful that there is anything inherent in manic depression that makes people more creative than others. There is some evidence suggesting that those who are close relatives of someone with manic depression tend to be more successful in their careers than the average. However, it is always difficult to interpret these studies because they can be very selective in which families are investigated.

6.15 What advice should be given to a woman with manic depression who wants to have a baby?

There are two main aspects to this advice:

Women remain at risk of suffering acute episodes of mania or depression during pregnancy though the risk may be slightly reduced when compared to other times. However, the reduction in risk is small and it should not be assumed that pregnancy is protective against manic depression. On the other hand, the risk of relapse (particularly of manic relapse after childbirth) is very high, perhaps eight times the risk of any other month. Most women with manic depressive illness will need to take some preventive medication during pregnancy. Only those who have infrequent episodes are likely to get through pregnancy without a relapse and without medication.

The risks to the foetus from the medication do need to be balanced against the risks to the foetus and the mother if she relapses. Acute mania or depression will almost always require medication, often at higher doses and with more than one medication. Thus the aim of preventing exposure of the foetus to medication can actually lead to higher levels of treatment than if the preventive medication had been continued. This is coupled with the effect on the physical health of the mother through poor self-care during an acute episode.

The discussions with a woman who wishes to get pregnant (or who presents already pregnant) are never easy and only a mother can weigh up the risks of taking or not taking medication.

The safest tactic is to try to reduce and stop the medication prior to pregnancy. This is not always easy and the situation often arises of trying to take a woman slowly off preventive medication in order for her to become pregnant only to find that she relapses each time and has to restart treatment.

6.18 What is puerperal psychosis?

The puerperium is defined as the first 3 months after childbirth. This is the time in a woman’s life when she is most likely to suffer a relapse of manic depression. Mania is more common than depression though both occur as do mixed states. For about a third of all women who suffer from manic depression, the puerperium is the time when they first experience a serious episode of mania or depression.

A puerperal illness can be somewhat unusual in that the symptoms vary markedly throughout a single day. For example, when seeing a mother at one time in the day she can appear fairly rational and her symptoms not be prominent, but when seeing her a few hours later she can be clearly psychotic and disturbed (Case vignette 6.2). The other common feature of a puerperal psychosis is confusion so that mothers can have difficulty saying what day or what time it is, have trouble recognising people or places and getting lost in familiar surroundings.

The recognition and treatment of puerperal psychosis is vital for the health of both mother and baby and it is for this reason that there are specific mother-and-baby psychiatric beds in many (but unfortunately as yet not all) parts of the country. Successful treatment of a newly delivered psychotic mother can also prove exceptionally rewarding as she will usually make a good recovery.

The treatment of puerperal psychosis is essentially the same as treatment of mania or depression at other times, antipsychotics usually being the basis of medication treatment because manic and psychotic symptoms are so common. Some psychiatrists say that electroconvulsive therapy is particularly indicated at this time as it is a treatment of rapid onset and effectiveness, enabling the mother to recover as quickly as possible.

6.20 What is different about treating adolescents with bipolar disorder?

Diagnosis can be a difficult issue in this age group. There are a lot of other changes going on for teenagers and irritability is commonly seen. There is a natural reluctance to give a mental illness diagnosis and pursue a line of medication use unless you are sure that this is correct. Adolescents have the same symptoms as adults although adolescents may be more likely to have psychotic ideas and mixed affective states (see Q 1.11).

Treating adolescents with almost any medical condition can be stormy. This is often related to feeling angry and resentful at having a serious illness when their peers are all fit and healthy. Teenagers are usually keen to show their independence, make their own decisions and take care of themselves. Giving advice to them about treatment and lifestyle can often lead to resistance! It is usually difficult for them to fully recognise the nature of their illness and how little control they can have over their emotional state. People who suffer from bipolar illness need to take much better care of themselves than their peers do, which can be another source of resentment. Sticking to treatment regimens is difficult for everyone but teenagers can find it particularly arduous.

Illicit drug use is common among those in their teens and twenties and more common among those who have a mental illness. This can not only affect the course of the illness but also lead to other health and sometimes legal problems (Case vignette 6.3).

On the other hand, adolescents can also prove very robust and often manage to make up for lost time when they do recover. There is no reason to think that treatments that are effective for adults should not be used for adolescents, but as in the rest of medicine there are few treatment studies in this age group to guide the choice of drugs.

imageCASE VIGNETTE 6.3 DRUG USE AND NON-COMPLIANCE CAN BE SERIOUS COMPLICATIONS FOR ADOLESCENTS

Emelia had some problems at school when she was making and selling CDs to her friends. She had taken their money on the promise of making the CDs but found that she could not get them all made on time and her equipment broke down. The other students reported her to the school, who had contacted her parents and also the police. Her parents thought she had not been right but a psychiatric assessment indicated that this was unlikely to be related to any mental illness.

Three years later she presented in an emergency, having been ejected from a hotel where she had thrown a television through a third storey window. She had got fed up with all the programmes going on about her when it was none of their business. She was admitted to hospital and found to be irritable, sleepless and paranoid. She admitted smoking cannabis regularly and occasionally taking cocaine. Her symptoms settled over 4 weeks with antipsychotic treatment.

Over the next 3 years she had three further admissions and on each occasion she was both elated and irritable, as well as being overactive, aggressive and paranoid. Though she made a good recovery at each admission and managed to get back to college (they were particularly indulgent of her illness as she had a considerable artistic talent) she continued to smoke cannabis regularly and did not take any medication unless strongly encouraged by her parents. She also continued to have some unusual ideas about the way that television programmes would mention her name in obscure ways and had made a compilation video tape of these, which no-one else found very convincing (see also Q 1.15).

6.22 Do people with manic depression have evidence of brain damage?

Studies that have compared patients with psychotic illnesses including schizophrenia and manic depression with normal controls have consistently shown that there is a statistical increase in the amount of fluid in the ventricles of the brain and surrounding it. This indicates that there is, on average, some loss of brain matter in those with psychosis compared with controls. This is more markedly so in those suffering from schizophrenia than with manic depression.

The differences between bipolars and normal controls are statistical rather than categorical; in other words it is not possible to tell from any brain scan whether the person is in the bipolar or the control group. There is often a difficulty in finding appropriate controls for comparison and some studies have tended to compare patients to ‘super normal’ people who have been heavily screened to exclude any possible factor that might affect the brain, rather than just the guy who lives next door!

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have also tended to show an increase in abnormalities in the brain. These show up as intense white spots on the scans. These hyperintensities occur in the white matter of the brain and are often present even in the early stages of bipolar illness in those who have made a good recovery from the acute episode. We do not know what these abnormalities mean or why they occur. It has been thought that these may relate to vascular changes in the brain, though they can be present in those bipolars who do not appear to be particularly liable to vascular disease. It would be easy to assume that these lesions would be related to cognitive impairment but so far this has not been shown to be the case (Monkul et al 2003).

It is not apparent that there is a particular area of the brain which is abnormal that might be considered as the ‘seat’ of manic depression.

Many people with manic depression and their families ask that their brain be scanned to see if there is any abnormality. Many psychiatrists will perform brain scans particularly of new patients with manic depression to make sure that there is no organic abnormality but the pick-up of identifiable lesions is low and that of remediable lesions is even lower.

6.23 What is the treatment for rapid cycling?

Taking antidepressants is strongly associated with rapid cycling (Fig. 6.1) and the best line of treatment is to stop the antidepressant. There is also a connection associated with thyroid dysfunction and this should be checked as well.

It is very unusual for a patient to start the illness in a rapid cycling phase, so those who go into rapid cycling will usually have already been treated with lithium. If not, then lithium should be considered. Valproate is generally thought to be a more effective treatment than lithium for rapid cycling, though this may be partly a selection bias in the studies in that the rapid cyclers are already lithium non-responders. It may require a combination of the two mood stabilisers to bring about a resolution. Carbamazepine is the other option in trying to find a long-term treatment for the illness.

The good news about rapid cycling is that it is not a state that manic depressives stay in long term and that even if the treatment doesn’t change it, rapid cycling does seem to resolve though it may transform into chronic depression. Rapid cycling is comparatively rare: at any one time less than 5% of manic depressives will be in a rapid cycling phase. It also seems to be associated with bipolar II illness so that patients are moving between depression and hypomanic states rather than the more severe manic states.

6.25 How should alcohol problems in bipolars be treated?

The principles of treatment for alcohol misuse and dependence are the same as for anyone else. The particular issue for most manic depressives is that they experience a predominance of dysphoric mood and so want to relieve or escape from this in any way that they can; alcohol offers a considerably more rapid relief than any of the medications we offer. However, chronic heavy alcohol use leads to more depression and withdrawal symptoms usually include anxiety. These depressive and anxiety symptoms tend to be attributed to the manic depression and alcohol seen as the only route to release. At the other end of the mood spectrum, mania causes disinhibition and drunkenness is a common consequence of this. Alcohol can then lead to escalating disruptive or aggressive behaviour.

TREATMENT

Discuss the fact that it is a common problem for bipolars and that you want to make sure that their alcohol intake doesn’t slowly creep up as a preventive strategy. Many people minimise the problems and it is only by coming back to the subject over the longer term will you be able to get them to accept that a change is needed.

The specific issues related to manic depression also need consideration. Drinking alcohol to excess is a common feature of the acute phase of both mania and depression. It may be that alcohol use between episodes is at a reasonable level. In that case the priority in treatment will be to manage the acute symptoms and if the patient can be persuaded to do this then the alcohol excess will come back under control as they recover.

More commonly the alcohol misuse will be an important factor in preventing recovery from the depression, and so reducing alcohol use is the priority. This involves two main approaches:

Finally, be aware that alcoholism accompanying bipolar illness puts the patient at particularly high risk for suicide.

6.26 How should drug misuse in a bipolar patient be managed?

The same principles apply to drug misuse as to alcohol misuse: give the appropriate treatments and help that would be offered for the individual problems. In practice, however, this is usually difficult, the main reason being that drug misuse and manic depression make each other worse.

Substance misuse worsens the prognosis of bipolar illness because episodes of illness and psychotic symptoms can be induced by the pharmacological effect of the drug. It is also much less likely that the patient will take the medicines regularly if they are frequently intoxicated.

TREATMENT

The initial line of treatment is to find out how serious a problem the patient perceives it to be and have a discussion about the consequences that are already apparent and what may be ahead. Many bipolars will recognise that others see drug misuse as a problem but feel they cannot tackle it because it is one of the few ways they have of gaining relief. This can be particularly true of cannabis use, which is rarely perceived as deleterious. Unless you can be agreed on the nature of the problem it is very difficult to make further progress and treatment suggestions will tend to fall on deaf ears. If this is the stage patients are at, you will need to continue to focus on the problems and consequences along with looking at any efforts they have made to tackle it. Ask about periods when they have not used drugs:–how did they get on, what other ways did they use to deal with unpleasant emotions?

If there is a clear addiction to opiates then substitution and detoxification are likely to be required if they are to stop using the drug. Opiate withdrawal is usually managed by specialists, either psychiatrists or specialist general practitioners, because of both the clinical and the legal issues involved. Stimulant and cannabis withdrawal are not usually treated with medication.

Managing the interaction between the manic depression and the substance misuse involves two main approaches:

PQ PATIENT QUESTIONS

6.28 What effect will the drugs I am taking have on the baby?

The great majority of babies born to women who have bipolar illness are entirely normal and only a very small proportion is affected by the type of medicine you take. However, you will need to weigh up before you get pregnant what the risks are and whether you can accept them. This is a very difficult decision to make and unfortunately many women get pregnant and then think about it, which means that they have missed the boat.

All three of the most commonly used long-term treatments (lithium, valproate and carbamazepine) can affect a baby growing inside you. Valproate and carbamazepine are particularly associated with problems in the development of the nervous system, including spina bifida, but it is likely that if you take a vitamin called folate that the risk of this occurring can be reduced. The specific risk with lithium is likely to be a heart abnormality.

It is difficult to be sure what the risk is of your baby being born with a recognisable defect. It depends on many other factors (your age, health, diet, family history) as well as the effects of any drugs. Probably the best estimate we have is that there is a 10% chance of some problems being recognised (including very minor problems) and about 1% of a severe, life-threatening problem. However, you must talk over with your doctor what the risk is in your particular case, even if in the end the doctor is not able to give you a more accurate figure.

Older antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs seem to be safer during pregnancy and some women opt to try this route of treatment.

The other side of the balance is the risk of suffering depression or mania when you are pregnant and the effect of this on your health and the medicines that you would need to take if this occurred.

6.30 Can I still have a few beers?

The basic answer to this is yes. You do need to be cautious because alcohol can interact with medications. Many medications used to treat bipolar disorder have sedative effects and alcohol will usually exaggerate this sedation or drowsiness. A good rule of thumb is that you are likely to find that each drink is worth two compared to how it would usually affect you if you were not on the treatment. However, most longer term medications would not prevent you drinking moderate amounts of alcohol. There is an element of trial and error because individuals vary in their tolerance of alcohol and medicines. Most people manage to find whether they can tolerate reasonably a small amount of alcohol in combination with their medication. Drinking and driving is dangerous for everyone but if you are also taking medication then you are at much higher risk of having an accident and you are breaking the law if you are not capable of driving because of the combined effects of alcohol and drugs.

Alcohol and manic depression interact in other ways apart from the medication issue. About a quarter of manic depressives report serious problems with alcohol use. This may be because they are trying to ‘self-medicate’, i.e. they are trying to reduce their symptoms by drinking. This can be to reduce anxiety, dull depression or sedate mania. Chronic high use of alcohol runs the risk of addiction and the well-known physical and mental complications of alcoholism.

The main difficulty that people find with drinking less is that so much social life revolves around drinking alcohol and most of us like to drink as it makes social situations easier and more enjoyable. However, it is worth thinking about whether you can have some social life that does not include alcohol. Exercise and sport tend not to include alcohol (at least beforehand!) but finding good avenues to socialise that don’t include alcohol can be good for your mood all round, not just because you are drinking less.

6.32 Why can’t I think as well as I used to before I developed manic depression?

Several studies have shown that people with manic depression tend to do less well on tests of ‘cognitive function’, i.e. thinking skills (e.g. IQ type tests). Although on average manic depressives do less well than the general population there is a wide range (as there is in the whole population) so that many with the illness are still doing better than average.

We do not know the cause of this problem. It is possible that whatever the brain change is that causes the manic depression also causes the cognitive changes. Brain scans of people with manic depression tend on average to show more minor problems than those of other people–for example on the most sensitive magnetic scans more small areas tend to ‘light up’. We do not know the meaning of this, although possibly there is a blood flow problem. However, you could not look at a scan and say ‘that person has manic depression and that one does not’ and there is no particular area of the brain of manic depressives on which everyone has a bright spot. Some of these differences may explain why a number of people with bipolar illness have problems with memory and concentration, even when they are not depressed or manic.

The other obvious possibility is that the medicines may affect the brain. Certainly if you get a toxic level of lithium you will be generally physically ill and you can damage the brain. This is why it is so important to monitor the levels carefully so that you never have toxic levels. On the other hand, there are some interesting studies suggesting that lithium may help to protect brain cells if they are damaged by a stroke, or even protect against Alzheimer’s dementia.

The other medicines–particularly the older antipsychotics–can have effects on the brain which cause sluggish thinking which is why most patients and doctors prefer the newer antipsychotics.

What can you do about this? Probably the more episodes of illness that you have the more likely you are to suffer the ‘brain’ problems and so doing all you can to avoid relapse is important. Also on the general principle of ‘use it or lose it’, keeping your mind interested, involved and active must be worthwhile for all of us.