Special circumstances and considerations

Published on 24/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Psychiatry

Last modified 24/05/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1071 times

6 Special circumstances and considerations

6.1 How can families come to terms with the illness?

There is no doubt that manic depression is a very serious, long-term illness that has a major impact on both the sufferer and the family. It puts enormous strain on close relationships and many families have been permanently ruptured by its effects. Each family finds its own way of coming to terms with the illness although there are some themes that often emerge.

Bipolar illness is usually outside of most people’s experience and it is easy to mistake the signs of the illness for other problems, such as delinquency or drunkenness or just plain stupidity. It is often only much later that these behaviours can be recognised as symptoms of manic depression. Reacting to an illness is different to reacting to other problems because of the issue of responsibility. Most of us would consider our partner or adult children to be responsible for their behaviour if they are getting into arguments, losing their job or getting drunk. However, if this is because they are manic then we would think that they are less responsible for their behaviour and we would give them more leeway, tend to ignore it but focus instead on getting appropriate help and treatment. Shifting from blaming the person to blaming the illness is a major shift in attitude.

However, the next step that is often reached is how much is the person who has the bipolar illness responsible for keeping themselves well and how much falls to the family? These issues usually revolve around the patient taking medication appropriately and taking care of themselves in terms of alcohol or illicit drugs and other aspects of lifestyle.

The other tension is that the patient will generally resent everything about the way they behave being put down to their illness, so that effectively anything they say or do which is at all out of the ordinary is dismissed as a symptom of their illness.

These issues are very similar to those that occur in adolescence as parents grapple with giving their children independence to do what they want, whether it is the right thing or not!

The accusation that ‘you’re treating me like a child’ is commonly heard. Finding the right balance at the right time is never perfectly achieved but can only be approached if both sides are able to be honest about what they think and feel. The right approach in one circumstance and in one stage of the illness may be entirely wrong in another, but finding this flexibility is very difficult. It is also easy to react with anger (on both sides) and want to walk away but this rarely works well, though occasionally is exactly right!

There are other aspects of the illness that families have to grapple with including the loss of hopes and dreams for the patient and for themselves and others in the family. Taking a realistic look at the illness and how much it will affect everyone’s lives is hard as there is a lot of uncertainty, particularly in the early years. Some will tend to go down a path of denial, and this is an aspect of thinking that most families go through at some point. They may either ignore what has happened or just hope that it will not happen again. Alternatively, they may move to the other extreme and assume that normal life is now entirely over. Keeping a realistic view of the future is important, and revising it as events unfold is part of that.

6.3 Do manic depressives have cognitive or intellectual deficits?

When Kraepelin made the distinction between manic depression and schizophrenia a hundred years ago, he did it partly on the basis that there was cognitive impairment among the schizophrenic group. In fact the name he gave to the illness we now call schizophrenia was dementia praecox. This comes from the Latin, meaning a precocious or premature dementia. It is certainly true that a major disability for those who suffer from schizophrenia is an impairment of their intellectual function. The situation for bipolars is less clear.

Before the symptoms of the illness start it is commonly found, among those with schizophrenia, that their school performance has been below average. This does not seem to apply to bipolars and in fact they are likely to be somewhat above average.

It is easy to recognise the intellectual impairments of severe depression, particularly when it is accompanied by retardation where even the most basic of mental tasks (e.g. getting a few words out) is difficult. The distractibility of mania also precludes clear and effective thinking. However, when there has been a good recovery from mania and depression, is there any cognitive impairment still present? At first sight there is not, but when detailed tests of intellectual function are undertaken then abnormalities emerge. Bipolars as a group do not have the severe impairments that those with schizophrenia show but they still do not equate to normal controls. It may be that this is part of the explanation for why those with manic depression often do not seem to be doing as well at work as would be expected even though they have made a good recovery in terms of being free of manic or depressive symptoms.

There are no particular tests that bipolars are especially likely to perform poorly on that can be easily tested in the surgery and in fact the differences between bipolars and normal controls tend to be matters of degree rather than categorical differences. It is also worth remembering that even minor levels of symptoms can have a substantial effect on intellectual function and this needs to be borne in mind when considering treatment.

6.5 Do complementary treatments have a place?

Where the line between mainstream and complementary treatment is drawn is uncertain. We are still not sure what forms of ‘talking’ therapies are effective (see Qs 3.20 and 5.46) and many people find less specialist forms of talking useful, from non-directive counselling to assertiveness training and anger management.

6.6 How does the stigmatisation of mental illness affect manic depressives?

Stigma means a mark of social disgrace. It is a form of prejudice that means making negative assumptions about people. It has a major impact on those who experience mental illness including those with manic depression. The common views are that they have brought the illness on themselves and that they are likely to be dangerous and violent.

There are also some rather paradoxical ideas–for example thinking that depression is a sign of weakness and that people should just ‘pull themselves together’ while at the same time thinking that nothing can be done to improve mental illnesses and therefore it will permanent. These views are so common and pervasive that many people with the illness will also share those ideas and so not think that it is worth bothering trying to get some help or treatment (see also Q 5.44).

The other view that people who have bipolar illness commonly hear is–‘You don’t seem like the type of person to suffer from depression’–which chimes with the idea that only certain people can experience mental illness (see Q 1.18).

The practical effect of stigma is that people are not given a chance to show what they can or cannot do–it’s just assumed that they are incapable. It is also very corrosive to someone’s self-esteem to be dismissed on the basis of assumptions about their illness.

Obviously manic depression does have a disabling effect on everyone that experiences it and it can lead to extreme, bizarre and unpredictable behaviour. This is part of the illness and needs to be faced and tackled head on, although stigma does exaggerate the disability.

Education about the illness and getting to know people who suffer from manic depression seem to be the only ways to reduce stigma. Learning about the reality of bipolar disorder and the ordinariness of those who experience it can change attitudes. One of the most powerful ways that stigma can be tackled is by prominent people letting it be known that they suffer from manic depression. In the United States, Ted Turner, who founded CNN (the news network), made it public that he suffered from the illness. In the UK, Spike Milligan was not only open about his illness (Case vignette 6.1) but also became patron of the Manic Depression Fellowship.

imageCASE VIGNETTE 6.1 TACKLING STIGMA

Spike Milligan is one of the few people in the UK to have been open about his manic depression. If you are familiar with his comedy you might think that his main problem was mania but in fact like most bipolars it was depression that really dogged him. At least some of his writing was driven by his manic or hypomanic symptoms but he said that his comic genius was not worth the manic depression agony.

Spike had a family history of depression in his mother who was depressed after his birth. He had a difficult childhood with his mother’s problems and his father being away in the army. He spent his early years in India and found it a shock to return to a cold and harsh pre-war England.

He joined the army in World War II and fought for 4 years in North Africa and Italy before being wounded in a mortar attack. Following this he was ‘weepy, frightened, lethargic and ill’. He was treated with tranquillisers and after a week was sent back–‘Up to the guns and as soon as I heard them go I started to stammer’. He was withdrawn from frontline service.

As a young man he was prone to mood swings, ‘fast and joking’ at times but ‘low and lacking drive’ at others.

He developed his career after the War, particularly as the writer of The Goon Show in the 1950s. He seemed to do this in a frenzy of activity with at times very little sleep in an intense and highly productive 6 years. Towards the end of this time he was probably manic but he collapsed into depression and was admitted to hospital.

Over the following years he had several admissions to hospital and his depressions were long and debilitating. His illness was severe enough to require treatment with ECT. Mania was not a prominent part of his illness but he seems to have used his manic energy productively.

He died in 2002, and the epitaph he chose for his gravestone reads: ‘I told you I was illRsquo;.

His manic humour is revealed in the way that he played with words and ideas–for example ‘This is Minnie Bannister, the world-famous poker player–give her a good poker and she’ll play any tune you like.’

6.9 What is self-management?

Everyone with a serious chronic illness needs to find a way to understand and manage that illness so that the disabling effect on their life is minimised.

The term ‘self-management’ has been used by the Manic Depression Fellowship (MDF, see Appendix 1) for this process of gaining more control over the condition. The MDF is a national self-help organisation in the UK. They promote this process of taking more responsibility for one’s own condition through literature, self-help groups and a national training course.

There are a number of elements in self-management:

Being an informed and insightful patient is undoubtedly one of the best routes to long-term mental stability for those with bipolar illness.

Buy Membership for Psychiatry Category to continue reading. Learn more here