Small Vessel Disease

Published on 12/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 12/04/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 2937 times

Chapter 7 Small Vessel Disease

Small vessel disease is the less understood of the major mechanisms of cerebral ischemia. This is the case despite its high prevalence in the elderly population, in whom it can present in the form of lacunar strokes, intracerebral hemorrhage, and cognitive decline.1

The seminal work of Dr. C. M. Fisher based on his clinicopathological observations led to the definition of lacunar strokes as small subcortical infarcts measuring between 3 mm and 2 cm and caused by the occlusion of penetrating branches of cerebral arteries.2 He described lipohyalinosis, a hypertensive microvasculopathy, as the main anatomical substrate for the development of lacunar infarctions and also deep cerebral hemorrhages.3 However, he recognized that plaques of atheroma in the parent vessel occluding the origin of the penetrating branch4 and probably microembolism (in patients with structurally normal penetrating branch corresponding to the area of small infarction and a systemic cause of embolism)4 could also produce lacunar strokes. He characterized the classic lacunar syndromes but noted that a number of atypical clinical presentations could also occur. He was then well aware of the fact that small vessel disease does not constitute a uniform disorder but rather may result from a complex spectrum of conditions with various clinical manifestations.

Unfortunately, the conceptualization of lacunar strokes became quite simplified and dogmatic (and therefore untrue) over time. Lacunar infarctions had to manifest with one of the traditional “lacunar syndromes,” they had to be less than 15 mm in size, they only happened in hypertensive patients, and they were always caused by “small vessel disease” (typically understood as lipohyalinosis according to what became known as the “lacunar hypothesis”). However, the advent of brain imaging techniques came to prove that these general assumptions cannot be always applied. First, computed tomography (CT) scan and most recently and especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have reactivated research on this topic by uncovering the real dimension of the intricate disorder we now call small vessel disease to include small subcortical infarctions, microhemorrhages, and white matter changes (also known as leukoaraiosis for the rarefaction of the white matter seen on pathological specimens) (Figure 7-1).

Longitudinal studies using serial MRI scans are shedding light on the incidence, progression, and severity of cognitive decline in patients with white matter disease. As a consequence, vascular dementia is emerging as a major public health concern.5 Neuroimaging is replacing pathology in the study of the pathophysiology of small vessel strokes, a remarkable indication of progress because small subcortical strokes are not fatal and therefore pathological examinations only allow the examination of chronic lesions. In fact, new theories defying the preeminence of lipohyalinosis have been postulated to explain the genesis of small subcortical strokes.6,7 Additionally, hemosiderin-sensitive sequences (such as gradient recall echo) allow visualization of areas of microhemorrhage, which were previously impossible to diagnose in vivo.8,9

In this chapter, we attempt to illustrate the contribution of neuroimaging to the understanding of small vessel disease, acknowledging that most is still to be learned in this fascinating field.

SMALL SUBCORTICAL INFARCTIONS

The most common locations of small subcortical infarctions are illustrated in Figure 7-3: putamen, caudate, thalamus, internal capsule, corona radiata, pons, and medulla.
However, CT scans can also provide useful information to help determine the underlying mechanisms of stroke and the extent of the necessary workup.16 For example, in our experience, when a small subcortical infarction is seen on CT scan in a patient presenting with classical lacunar syndrome and no evidence of atrial fibrillation, the yield of transesophageal echocardiogram is low.17
It may identify otherwise unsuspected embolic stroke patterns in up to one third of patients with lacunar presentations.21,22 Sometimes DWI discloses an embolic mechanism by showing coexistent small cortical lesions in conjunction with a small subcortical infarction.10
It identifies acute from chronic subcortical infarctions.23 Small subcortical infarcts seen acutely on DWI can later be visualized on T2-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) as well as on CT scan (Figure 7-4). However, timing of the infarctions in patients with multiple subcortical lesions is often possible only by using DWI during the acute phase.

LACUNAR SYNDROMES

The correlation between traditional lacunar syndromes and specific anatomical locations is limited.19 For instance, pure motor hemiparesis can be due to lesions in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, basis pontis, corona radiata, or medial medulla.
Buy Membership for Neurology Category to continue reading. Learn more here