Skin Care Including Chemical Peeling

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2742 times

Chapter 2 Skin Care Including Chemical Peeling

Skin is the defining boundary of our personal space, a self-renewing organ, the first line of defense against systemic infection, and an indicator to others of our chronologic age. It is a barrier that weathers with advancing age and the insults of ultraviolet (UV) radiation to become wrinkled, discolored, and uneven. Skin care includes cleansing, moisturizing, and photoprotection, while chemical peeling is a method for improving the appearance and function of aging skin.

Summary

Introduction

Skin is the defining boundary of our personal space, a self-renewing organ, the first line of defense against systemic infection, and an indicator to others of our chronologic age. It is a barrier that weathers with advancing age and the insults of ultraviolet (UV) radiation to become wrinkled, discolored, and uneven. Skin care includes cleansing, moisturizing, and photoprotection, while chemical peeling is a method for improving the appearance and function of aging skin.

The skin is composed of three layers: the stratum corneum, epidermis, and dermis.

The stratum corneum forms the skin barrier and is composed of two distinct anatomic units:

Structural damage to the corneocytes or to the lipids results in a defective barrier. With the aid of an electron microscope, it is possible to see the covalently bound lipid layer between the corneocytes forming an organized watertight seal over the body (Fig. 2.2).

Barrier damage occurs when:

The health of the skin is therefore ultimately dependent on the non-living stratum corneum. The underlying viable epidermis and dermis form the cellular renewable layers of the skin, accounting for its strength and distensible characteristics.

The most important role of the stratum corneum is to modulate the water content of the skin, which should be approximately 30%. Too much water creates maceration and too little water decreases the elastic properties of the skin and creates skin surface wrinkles of dehydration.

Equilibrium between the external climate and internal environment of the body occurs at about 70% humidity; however, the average humidity of a conditioned environment is 20–30%. Therefore, there is a constant net loss of water from the skin to the air (i.e. transepidermal water loss). If this water loss becomes excessive, the skin recognizes that a barrier defect has occurred, resulting in a rapid burst in the synthesis of intercellular lipids (ceramides, sterols, and fatty acids).

Deliberate wounding of the skin, such as the insult induced by chemical peeling, results in a profound, but controlled, damage to the skin structures, requiring the proper selection of skin care products to optimize the cosmetic result.

Indications

Skin peeling is a controlled removal and renewal of the various layers of the skin, depending on the depth of the wound:

The depth of the peel is controlled by the strength of the acid applied to the skin surface and the length of time for which the acid is left in contact with the skin.

Chemical peels are a carefully controlled wounding of the skin and are designed to improve cosmetic appearance.

Any part of the body can be subjected to a chemical peel, but the face produces the most dramatic and reliable results. This is because the facial skin is thin and it heals with minimal scarring. The face is the only body site where a deep chemical peel is performed.

Superficial chemical peels produce little effect on any area other than the face where they are used to produce a mild exfoliation improving skin texture. This improved skin texture is appreciated by the patient as increased facial shine (sometimes referred to as radiance) and smoother facial cosmetic application.

Medium-depth chemical peels may be performed on the entire body, but are most frequently used on the neck, chest, and arms. Typically, higher concentration acids are used on the face with a reduced concentration applied to any other body area.

Chemical peels produce the best results in fair complected individuals (Fitzpatrick type I and II) with predominantly pigmentary photodamage. Darker skin types (Fitzpatrick type III and higher) are more challenging to treat with chemical peeling because the inflammation induced by the superficial or medium-depth peel may result in unsightly post-procedure hyperpigmentation. Darker skin types also more frequently exhibit hypertrophic scarring and keloid formation, predisposing to an undesirable outcome.

Deep chemical peels are never performed on darker skinned individuals because the acid may damage the melanocytes, resulting in permanent hypo- or depigmentation, unless hypopigmentation is part of the aesthetic goal.

A chemical peel can be performed for a variety of indications:

A medium-depth peel will not improve deeper rhytids around the mouth and folds on the face, such as the nasolabial and melolabial folds. It is not possible to successfully improve facial folds with any type of chemical peel, but deeper rhytids around the mouth and on the lateral cheeks can be improved with a deep chemical peel, possibly combined with a facelift procedure or the use of injectable fillers.

In my opinion, the best indication for chemical peeling is in the improvement of facial pigmentation. The precise ability to control the depth of the peel by proper acid selection yields excellent pigment removal without further dyspigmentation or scarring. Although laser resurfacing is sometimes used for pigmentation improvement, the laser does not afford the control of chemical peeling. Chemical peeling is an art combining visual assessment of the peel depth produced by the different types and strengths of acid left on the skin for varying intervals. This allows clinicians to adapt the chemical peel to the varying degrees of pigmentation in the treated area.

Preoperative History and Considerations

A detailed history must be obtained prior to a chemical peeling procedure to ensure an optimal outcome and result longevity.

Individuals who have been treated with systemic retinoids should not undergo a chemical peeling procedure for at least 6 months to 1 year, depending on the depth of the chemical peel desired. This is because systemic retinoids such as isotretinoin reduce the activity of sebaceous glands and thereby increase susceptibility to hypertrophic scarring, which can be disastrous in the case of a chemical peel where the entire face is wounded.

A history of oral hormone supplementation is also important. Estrogen replacement therapy and oral contraceptives predispose the patient to facial hyperpigmentation. In some individuals, dyspigmentation may rapidly return following a facial peel if exogenous estrogen is consumed. Discontinuation of the estrogen for at least 3–6 months prior to the procedure and after the procedure is advantageous, but not always feasible. Women who are not able to discontinue their estrogen should be advised that the pigmentation may return and counseled on the proper use of photoprotection.

It is also worth inquiring about the patient’s skin care regimen. Patients who are using prescription topical retinoids, such as tretinoin, adapalene, or tazarotene, will experience much deeper and more rapid penetration of the acid into the skin. Although retinoids are used prior to medium and deep chemical peels to enhance penetration, they may produce a much deeper peel than expected or desired in patients wishing only a superficial chemical peel.

Patients may also be undergoing microdermabrasion, spa-administered chemical peels, or other aesthetician procedures that damage the skin barrier, enhancing acid penetration and yielding unexpected results.

Operative Approach

The peeling procedure for superficial, medium, and deep peels is somewhat similar, each deeper peel building on a more superficial skin wounding (Table 2.1).

Superficial peels

Superficial peels usually consist of either a glycolic or salicylic acid solution applied to the face in three coats. Glycolic acid superficial peels are water-soluble (hydrophilic) in contrast to salicylic acid peels, which are oil soluble (lipophilic).

Peeling procedure

A superficial peel can be the desired treatment endpoint or it may be followed by a medium-depth peel, which is actually a two-step peeling procedure with a stratum corneum wounding procedure followed by a deep epidermal or superficial dermal wounding procedure.

Superficial peel

It is also important to watch for reddening and whitening of the face. Reddening of the face indicates early wounding and vasodilation whereas whitening (also known as frosting) indicates deeper wounding and protein coagulation. The more confluent the whitening of the skin, the deeper the peel (Fig. 2.3C). Very minimal scattered whitening is all that should be achieved with a superficial peel. The peel is immediately neutralized with cool water on disposable washcloths wiped across the face until the stinging and burning has resolved. Neutralization is extremely important in glycolic acid peels because the acid will continue to wound the skin until removed. However, salicylic acid peels are self-neutralizing because the acid crystallizes on the skin surface. Thorough water rinsing is soothing to the skin surface. I usually completely rinse the skin three times and follow this by an application of a bland occlusive moisturizer, such as Cetaphil cream (Galderma, Ft Worth, TX). Further skin care considerations are discussed in the Skin care section.

Medium-depth peel

Deep chemical peels

Deep chemical peels:

Postoperative Care

The amount of postoperative care depends on the degree of the skin wound. Superficial peels require no postoperative care, whereas medium and deep chemical peels require application of petroleum jelly, to prevent undesirable water loss from the wounded skin surface, at least twice daily with warm tap water rinsing of the area for at least 4 days. At day 4, most patients can begin wearing cosmetics and use a foaming face cleanser accompanied by a simple oil-in-water moisturizer (Eucerin cream, Beiersdorf, Germany). It is best to follow up the patient 1 week after a medium or deep peel procedure to ensure that healing is progressing and there are no problems.

If the medium-depth peel is being performed to improve skin dyspigmentation, a hydroquinone-containing bleaching cream is recommended 1 week after the peel. This prevents repigmentation from UV exposure and hormonal influences. The use of a physical sun block, containing zinc oxide or titanium dioxide, may also be helpful to prevent UVA stimulation of the melanocytes.

Skin care

Postpeel skin care is important and includes the use of cleansers and moisturizers.

Skin cleansing is the chemical interaction of surfactant with the skin surface combined with physical rubbing. The physical rubbing and the chemical interaction are equally as important.

Proper skin cleansing removes sebum, apocrine and eccrine secretions, environmental dirt, bacteria, fungal elements, yeast, desquamating keratinocytes, medications, cosmetics, and skin care products while not removing intercellular lipids or damaging the brick and mortar structural organization of the stratum corneum.

Cleansers

There are a variety of skin cleansers,13 including soaps, syndets, and combars (Table 2.2), which can be placed on a variety of cleansing implements from the hands to a washcloth to a disposable face cloth.

Table 2.2 Skin cleanser categories and properties.

Type of cleanser (commercial examples) Advantages Disadvantages
Soap Excellent cleansing thorough sebum removal Can dry skin; not recommended for sensitive, healing or diseased skin
Syndet (synthetic detergent)
Combar
More mild cleansing; recommended post-surgery; may be used for sensitive or diseased skin Not as thorough sebum removal
Good cleansing; commonly combined with triclosan topical antibacterial; good choice for high-risk wound infections or contaminated body areas  

True soap is a specific type of cleanser with an alkaline pH of 9–10 created by chemically reacting a fat and an alkali to create a fatty acid salt with detergent properties. Soap efficiently removes both sebum and intercellular lipids, making it an excellent general skin cleanser, but a poor choice following any type of surgical procedure resulting in a damaged barrier.

The need for good hygiene in a compromised barrier situation has led to the development of synthetic detergents, known as syndets (Fig. 2.5). The most popular syndet cleansers contain sodium cocoyl isethionate with a neutral pH of 5.5–7. This more neutral pH removes fewer intercellular lipids, preventing further barrier damage during cleansing. These products, particularly in the form of a foaming face wash, are the best post-procedure cleansers.

The final category of traditional cleansers is combars, which combine soap and syndet cleansers in the same product with a pH of 7–9. Combars remove more sebum than a syndet cleanser, but less than a soap cleanser. Most deodorant cleansers fall into this category and contain triclosan as a topical antibacterial. Combars are useful post-surgically for the patient who is at risk for cutaneous infection.

Moisturizers

Moisturizers (Fig. 2.6)47 are applied to the skin following cleansing in the post-surgical patient to minimize transepidermal water loss, so creating an environment that is optimal for skin healing.

The three categories of substances that can be combined to enhance the water content of the skin are occlusives, humectants, and hydrocolloids:

A quality moisturizer will combine ingredients from all three categories to provide multiple mechanisms of moisturizing the skin.

A commonly marketed moisturizer formulation combines petrolatum (the most effective moisturizing ingredient presently known) with dimethicone to minimize greasiness and effectively retard 99% of the transepidermal water loss. The addition of glycerin to hold water in the skin with a peptide to create an artificial barrier complete the formulation. Incorporating vitamins, such as vitamin C or vitamin E, or botanicals (such as aloe, green tea, or soy) add distinction among products in the marketplace.

The biggest challenge in the delivery of anti-aging substances to the skin is the stratum corneum. An intact stratum corneum is key to the skin barrier and a necessary part of post-procedure healing, but impedes the penetration of many substances into the skin. This extremely important function means that the stratum corneum prevents infection and the entry of toxic foreign substances and allergens into the body. However, the barrier also prevents most large molecular weight proteins and botanicals from entering the skin and functioning as modulators of collagen production or topical antioxidants.

Probably one of the most effective moisturizer additives is sunscreen, which has the ability to both prevent and reverse photoaging.

Sunscreens

Sunscreens819 are an important part of post-surgical skin care. Inflammation resulting from a face peel or other skin wounding procedure can cause hyperpigmentation, especially in the presence of UVA radiation, which stimulates melanin production by melanocytes.

Photoprotective mechanisms may be endogenous (Table 2.3) or externally applied (Table 2.4).

Table 2.3 Natural cutaneous UV protective mechanisms.

Cutaneous structure Sun protective mechanism
Compact horny layer Absorbs and scatters UV
Keratinocyte melanin

Carotenoid pigments

Urocanic acid Oxidized to stabilize UV-induced oxygen radicals Superoxide dismutase

Epidermal DNA excision repair Repairs UV-induced DNA damage

Sunscreen ingredients can be classified into two major categories.

Sunscreen ingredients can be divided into the following three groups:

Most modern sunscreen formulations are a blend of two to three different substances carefully selected to compliment one another and enhance product performance (Fig. 2.7). However, raising the SPF above 30 only confers an incremental increase in photoprotection (Fig. 2.8).

References

1. Willcox M.J., Crichton W.P. The soap market. Cosmet Toilet. 1989;104:61-63.

2. Wortzman M.S. Evaluation of mild skin cleansers. Dermatol Clin. 1991;9:35-44.

3. Wortzman M.S., Scott R.A., Wong P.S., et al. Soap and detergent bar rinsability. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1986;37:89-97.

4. Draelos Z.D. Therapeutic moisturizers. Dermatol Clin. 2000;18:597-607.

5. Flynn T.C., Petros J., Clark R.E., et al. Dry skin and moisturizers. Clin Dermatol. 2001;19:387-392.

6. Rawlings A.V., Harding C.R., Watkinson A., et al. Dry and xerotic skin conditions. In: Leyden J.J., Rawlings A.V., editors. Skin moisturization. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002:119-144.

7. Draelos Z.D. Moisturizers. In: Draelos Z.D., editor. Cosmetics in dermatology. 2nd edn. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1995:83-95.

8. Ichihashi M., Ueda M., Budiyanto A., et al. UV-induced skin damage. Toxicology. 2003;189:21-39.

9. Young A.R. Cumulative effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin: cancer and photoaging. Semin Dermatol. 1990;9:25-31.

10. Gilchrest B.A. A review of skin ageing and its medical therapy. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:867-875.

11. Matsumura Y., Ananthaswamy H.N. Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;195:298-308.

12. Wulf H.C., Sandby-Møller J., Kobayasi T., et al. Skin aging and natural photoprotection. Micron. 2004;35:185-191.

13. Kawada A., Noda T., Hiruma M., et al. The relationship of sun protection factor to minimal erythema dose, Japanese skin type, and skin color. J Dermatol. 1993;20:514-516.

14. Roelandts R., Sohrabvand N., Garmyn M. Evaluating the UVA protection of sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21:56-62.

15. Diffey B.L. A method for broad spectrum classification of sunscreens. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1994;16:47-52.

16. Nash J.F. Human safety and efficacy of ultraviolet filters and sunscreen products. Dermatol Clin. 2006;24:35-51.

17. Gasparro F.P., Mitchnick M., Nash J.F. A review of sunscreen safety and efficacy. Photochem Photobiol. 1998;68:243-256.

18. Moloney F.J., Collins S., Murphy G.M. Sunscreens: safety, efficacy and appropriate use. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:185-191.

19. Tanner P.R. Sunscreen product formulation. Dermatol Clin. 2006;24:53-62.