Selective Percutaneous Posterolateral Endoscopic Lumbar Nuclectomy

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3160 times

Chapter 26 Selective Percutaneous Posterolateral Endoscopic Lumbar Nuclectomy

A percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) through a posterolateral approach is one of many newly developed minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques. These techniques require only a small skin incision, present less traumatic sequelae to the muscles, epidural space, and neural tissues passing through the intervertebral foramen, and allow an early recovery after the procedure.

The three distinct mechanisms for pain relief by selective percutaneous posterolateral endoscopic lumbar discectomy are a manageable bulk decompression under direct endoscopic visualization and fluoroscope guidance, dilution of inflammatory peptides through continuous irrigation, and denervation of ingrown nerves by means of radiofrequency and laser (Fig. 26-1).

Selective chromoendoscopy (Table 26.1) in spine surgery is based on using the specific indicator (a blue color) of indigo carmine that is highly reactive with acidic extracellular matrix in degenerated nucleus pulposus. There is strong evidence for the usefulness of applying indigo carmine for selective endoscopic intervertebral nuclectomy in degenerated nucleus. However, there is no strict difference between normal aging and degeneration in the intervertebral disc (IVD), and an acidic condition of the IVD does not always indicate a pathologic condition. Removal of all blue-colored nucleus pulposus ensures the removal of all degenerated nucleus pulposus, whether or not the IVD is pathologically degraded. To remove the neural compression of herniated nucleus, decompression must become the primary purpose. Therefore, selective nuclectomy must be performed only when the targeted herniated nucleus turned blue in the posterior third of the IVD during chromoendoscopy.

Table 26.1 Concept of Selective Percutaneous Posterolateral Endoscopic Lumbar Nuclectomy

Selective Blue-stained degenerated acid nucleus pulposus
Percutaneous A small incision, not open
Posterolateral Minimization of muscle trauma, with passage through the intervertebral foramen
Endoscopic Under direct visualization
Nuclectomy Targeted third of posterior herniated nucleus under fluoroscopic guidance

Complications

The informed consent discussion with the patient should include the following possible complications and their management (Table 26.2):

Table 26.2 Potential Complications, Their Causes, and Their Management

Potential Complication Cause(s) Management
Inability to access the involved area

Requires conversion to an interlaminar approach Transient dysesthesia (sunburn syndrome) Gabapentin and/or selective dorsal root ganglion block Lumbar plexopathy Blunt trauma by an approach that is too near the midline, i.e., within 8 cm Superficial or deep-layer hematoma Occurs in the subcutaneous tissue or between the psoasas major and minor muscles Aggravation of instability In patients with spondylolisthesis combined with disc herniation Percutaneous external pedicle screw fixation

Preoperative prepations

Instrumentation

Necessary instrumentation and preparation for posterolateral endoscopic discectomy (Figs. 26-6 to 26-8) consists of the following:

Procedure

image

Figure 26–9 Yeung protocol for needle and instrument placement Yeung AT, Yeung CY: Posterolateral selective endoscopic diskectomy: The YESS technique. (A) Posteroanterior (PA) fluoroscopic (C-arm) exposure enables topographic location of the spinal column midline and the transverse planes of the target discs. Intersections of drawn lines mark the PA disc centers (arrows). (B) Lateral fluoroscopic exposure enables topographic location of the lateral disc center and allows visualization of the plane of inclination for each disc. Intersections of drawn lines mark the lateral disc centers (arrows) (C) The inclination plane of each target disc (red lines) is drawn on the skin from the lateral disc center (plus signs) to the posterior skin surface. (D) The distance between lateral disc centers (plus signs) and the posterior skin surface plane is measured along each disc inclination line (red line). (E and F) This distance is then measured from the midline along the respective transverse plane line for each disc. At the end of this measurement, a line parallel to the midline (long black horizontal line) is drawn to intersect each disc inclination line (red line). This intersection marks the skin entry point or “skin window” for each target disc. Needle insertion at this point toward the disc is angled approximately 25 to 30 degrees to that the needle enters the disc at the dorsal quadrant, traversing just under the superior facet of the inferior vertebra to get as dorsal and close to the posterior anulus as possible. Lateral disc centers (black Xs). In DH Kim, RG Fessler, JJ Regan (eds). Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Instrumentation. New York, Thieme, 2005, pp 201-211.

See also Table 26.3 and Figure 26-19 for a summary of the operative steps and Figures 26-20 and 26-21 for endoscopic views of the procedure.

Table 26.3 Steps of Percutaneous Selective Chromoendoscopic Nuclectomy

Step Chapter Figure(s)
Drawing for placement of needle and instrument 26-9, 26-10
Confirmatory chromodiscography and guidewire insertion 26-11
An obturator tube passes over the guidewire 26-12
Working sleeve inserted and obturator tube removed 26-13
Anulotome with small and large trephines 26-14
Endoscope placement through the sleeve 26-15A
Selective nuclectomy 26-15-B to F
Denervation and anuloplasty 26-16, 26-17
Skin closure 26-18

Caveats

Case Study 26.1

A 19-year-old woman with a 1-year history of mild low back pain and intermittent left leg pain sustained an acute exacerbation of the left leg pain 21 days prior to visiting to our clinic. She was preparing for a university entrance examination at the time and was unable to sit to study, and she had to sleep in a reclining position to reduce the left leg pain. The standing and reclining positions provided some relief. She had received an epidural steroid injection in the back at the local clinic near her home; the symptoms recurred 3 days later. A large left paracentrally-foraminally extruded herniated nucleus with slight downward migration on the L4-L5 intervertebral space was found to be causing compression on the exiting nerve root. Open surgery was recommended.

The patient chose to delay the operation in order to continue preparing for the university entrance examination. She was concerned about a long-term hospital admission, a cosmetic problem, and possible complications after back surgery. She then decided to undergo minimally invasive spine surgery after suffering intractable pain that prevented sleep. She complained of a new onset of weakness, tingling, and constant numbness during the 2-hour trip to the clinic.

Physical examination at this time found that the patient was experiencing constant pain around the left posterior buttock, tenderness in the left sciatic notch, and numbness radiating down the left lower leg to the great toe and the dorsum of the left foot. The straight-leg raising test result was positive result, less than 20 degrees. A decreased sensation of light touch over the dorsum of the foot and great toe were also observed.

A confirming discogram of L4-L5 was performed. Intradiscal pressure was high until an injection of 1 mL of contrast agent and indigo carmine mixture was given and concordant radiating pain on the left leg occurred. With 1 mL to 2 mL of injected volume, the pressure was acutely decreased, and posterior downward leakage was observed on the lateral discographic view.

Selective posterolateral lumbar endoscopy was performed as described in the text of this chapter. During the discectomy, the patient felt relief of the radiating pain. Immediately after the procedure, tension signs had disappeared. The postoperative computed tomography scan demonstrated a decompressed extruded disc (see Fig. 26-22).

After being moved to a hospital room, the patient dressed and voided without assistance. When the surgeon visited 2 hours later, the patient could walk with some dysesthesia on the previous lesion site. When she came to the clinic 1 week later for follow-up, the wound was clean and she reported no discomfort during basic activities. The patient was advised that she could shower or bathe at this point, 1 week after the operation.