Sedation and Analgesia

Published on 24/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1116 times

Chapter 72 Sedation and Analgesia

2 What are some reasons for the mismanagement of pain in children?

Berde CB, Sethna NF: Analgesics for the treatment of pain in children. N Engl J Med 347:1094–1101, 2004.

Lampell MS, Leder MS: Pediatric pain control. Pediatr Emerg Med Rep 4:73–84, 1999.

Zempsky WT, Cravero JP, Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics 114:1348–1356, 2004.

4 Describe methods to reduce the pain of administration of local anesthetics

Local anesthetics administered through intact skin or into an open wound can cause considerable pain. Techniques that may be employed to reduce the pain of injection include using a needle of small caliber, buffering the lidocaine with bicarbonate, warming the drug, injecting slowly, and providing counterstimulation to the adjacent skin. Many physicians employ topical formulations, such as lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine, either in a liquid or a gel form. This may be administered, without using a needle, to exposed mucosa. These drugs should not be used in any regions of the body in which epinephrine is contraindicated, such as fingertips or ears.

In addition, liposomal lidocaine (LMX) and a mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) may each be applied to intact skin to reduce the pain of venipuncture. Physicians have also found these topical mixtures to alleviate the pain associated with lumbar punctures incision of abscesses, and insertion of intravenous lines.

Berde CB, Sethna NF: Analgesics for the treatment of pain in children. N Engl J Med 347:1094–1101, 2002.

Eichenfield LF, Funk A, Fallon-Friedlander S, Cunningham BB: A clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of ELA-Max (4% liposomal lidocaine) as compared with eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream for pain reduction of venipucture in children. Pediatrics 109:1093–1099, 2002.

Scarfone RJ, Jasani M, Gracey EJ: Pain of local anesthetics: Rate of administration and buffering. Ann Emerg Med 36:36–40, 1998.

Zempsky WT, Cravero JP, Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics 114:1348–1356, 2004.

8 What are the concerns about fasting guidelines for PSA?

Problems with these guidelines include:

Newer evidence suggests that prolonged fasting may not lead to fewer adverse events. In a recent report of over 1000 children receiving PSA, about half were not fasted as per the ASA guidelines. These children did not experience a greater incidence of aspiration or other adverse outcomes compared to the fasted group. A second study of over 2000 children and young adults found no correlation between preprocedural fasting time and adverse outcomes.

A recently published clinical practice advisory recommends weighing several factors when deciding what is the appropriate fasting for elective procedures. These factors include the overall health of the patient, the desired length and depth of sedation and analgesia, and the urgency of the procedure.

Agrawal D, Manzi SF, Gupta R, Krauss B: Preprocedural fasting state and adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 42:636–646, 2003.

American Society of Anesthesiologists: Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 96:1004–1017, 2002.

Green SM.: Fasting is a consideration—not a necessity—for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia. Ann Emerg Med 42:647–650, 2003.

Green SM, et al. Fasting and emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a consensus-based clinical practice advisory. Ann Emerg Med 49:454–461, 2007.

Roback, MG, Bajaj L, Wathen JE, Bothner J: Preprocedural fasting and adverse events in procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: Are they related? Ann Emerg Med 44:454–459, 2004.

17 Discuss the role of propofol for PSA

Propofol is a nonbarbiturate ultra–short-acting hypnotic agent. It has an extremely short onset (within 1 minute) of effect and duration of action, necessitating delivery by continuous IV infusion or frequent readministration for most procedures. Respiratory depression, hypoxemia, hypotension, and injection pain are common side effects. Its use requires vigilance on the part of physicians because of the likelihood of adverse effects. Its extremely rapid onset of action and potency make it difficult to titrate without inducing serious adverse effects. Unless physicians are experienced with its use, propofol would not be a good choice for sedating a child who will be leaving the ED, such as for a radiologic study. Even in the hands of practitioners experienced with its use, two thirds of children experienced decreases in systolic blood pressure below the fifth percentile and 12% had partial airway obstruction.

Bassett KE, Anderson JL, Pribble CG, et al: Propofol for procedural sedation in children in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 42:773–782, 2003.

Green SM, Krauss B: Propofol in emergency medicine: Pushing the sedation frontier. Ann Emerg Med 42:792–797, 2003.

Guenther E, Pribble CG, Junkins EP Jr, et al: Propofol sedation by emergency physicians for elective pediatric outpatient procedures. Ann Emerg Med 42:783–791, 2003.

Hertzog JH, Dalton HJ, Anderson BD, et al: Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children. Pediatrics 106:742–747, 2000.

21 A 3-year-old girl fell down five cement steps and struck her head on the pavement. She has vomited repeatedly since the injury but is fully alert and awake in the ED. You want to perform computed tomography of the head to rule out an intracranial injury. What are some sedation options for this patient?

Because the desired goal is to prevent the child from struggling and moving during the study, you wish to achieve sedation rather than analgesia. Pure sedative-hypnotics in common use in EDs include chloral hydrate, propofol, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and etomidate. In addition to providing sedation before imaging studies, these drugs may also be useful as adjuncts to narcotics prior to painful procedures.

For this patient, midazolam or pentobarbital may be the best choices. The ability to titrate each drug offers an advantage over chloral hydrate. Their safety profiles and longer durations of action offer advantages over propofol and etomidate.

Midazolam may be administered by the IV, intramuscular, oral, nasal, or rectal routes. Its onset is within minutes after IV administration, and clinical effectiveness usually lasts about 30 minutes. One may expect mild reductions in blood pressure and dose-related respiratory depression. Significant hypoventilation is rare unless the drug is given concurrently with a narcotic or pushed too rapidly. Its effects may be reversed with the competitive antagonist flumazenil.

Pentobarbital is a short-acting barbiturate that produces sedation within 5 minutes, lasting 30–60 minutes. As with midazolam, hypoventilation may occur but responds readily to gentle stimulation. Hypotension is a common side effect, and the drug should not be used in children with possible cardiovascular compromise.

22 An adolescent girl needs a lumbar puncture to rule out aseptic meningitis. What agent(s) should be used for PSA?

For this procedure, an IV sedative alone does not provide analgesia for the painful local anesthetic that should be administered in the lumbar region. Topical anesthetics alone don’t provide a great enough depth of analgesia for this indication. In response to the injection of the local anesthetic, an anxious patient may arch her back and move enough that it will be nearly impossible to perform the lumbar puncture.

Some physicians have had success combining midazolam with fentanyl, which is 100 times more potent than morphine. Fentanyl’s onset and duration of action closely parallel that of midazolam, making this combination particularly potent. Fentanyl provides analgesia and potentiates the sedative effect of midazolam. Respiratory depression is common with this combination but may be minimized by administering each agent over 60 seconds with a 60-second interval in between and by titrating doses carefully. Gentle stimulation of the patient and supplemental oxygen almost always prevent hypoxemia.

Fentanyl has a more rapid onset and shorter duration of action than morphine, making it a better choice for most procedural analgesia. When more prolonged analgesia is desired (e.g., for vaso-occlusive crisis), morphine is the better choice. The combination of midazolam and fentanyl is also useful in the settings of laceration repair, burn care, and reduction of minimally displaced or angulated fractures.

23 A 10-year-old boy has displaced and angulated fractures to his ulna and radius that require closed reduction. What agent(s) should be used for PSA?

Clearly, the primary goal in this case is to achieve potent analgesia for what is anticipated to be a very painful procedure. With the midazolam/fentanyl combination it will be difficult to achieve the depth of analgesia required without producing significant hypoventilation. In this case, ketamine is a good choice. It causes dissociation between the cortical and limbic systems, resulting in potent sedation, analgesia, and amnesia. Unlike most other agents, it does not cause cardiovascular depression. In fact, patients typically experience an increased heart rate and blood pressure with its use. Onset of action after IV administration is 3–5 minutes, with return of coherence in 30–45 minutes. Because ketamine causes hypersalivation, concurrent administration of atropine or glycopyrolate is indicated. Two uncommon but potentially serious side effects are hallucinatory emergence reactions and laryngospasm. Many clinicians believe that the incidence of emergent reactions can be minimized with the concurrent administration of midazolam, but the results of recent studies have failed to prove this. In a study assessing the ED use of intramuscular ketamine among more than 1000 children, over 90% achieved acceptable sedation within 10 minutes and four young children experienced transient laryngospasm. The expected rate of laryngospasm with the use of ketamine is 1 in 250.

Green SM, Krauss B: Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med 44:1–21, 2004.

Green SM, Rothrock SG, Lynch EL, et al: Intramuscular ketamine for pediatric sedation in the emergency department: Safety profile in 1,022 cases. Ann Emerg Med 31:688–697, 1998.

Heinz P, et al. Is atropine needed with ketamine sedation? A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Emerg Med J 23:206–209, 2006.

Roback MG, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of IV versus IM ketamine for sedation of pediatric patients receiving emergency department orthopedic procedures. Ann Emerg Med 48:605–612, 2006.

Sherwin TS, Green SM, Khan A: Does adjunctive midazolam reduce recovery agitation after ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 35:239–244, 2000.

Wathen JE, Roback MG, Mackenzie T, Bothner JP: Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? A double-blind, randomized, controlled, emergency department trial. Ann Emerg Med 36:579–588, 2003.

27 What are the recommended starting doses for sedatives and analgesics commonly used in children?

See Table 72-1.

Table 72-1 Recommended Starting Dose*

Drug Route Dose (mg/kg)
Midazolam IV 0.1
Midazolam IM 0.2
Midazolam IN 0.4
Midazolam PO, PR 0.5
Pentobarbital IM 4
Pentobarbital IV 2
Chloral hydrate PO 50–100
Propofol IV 1–3 load, 25–100 μg/kg/min
Etomidate IV 0.1–0.2
Ketamine IV 1–2
Ketamine IM 4
Morphine IV 0.1
Fentanyl IV 1 μg

IM = intramuscular, IN = intranasal, IV = intravenous, PO = oral, PR = rectal.

* All drugs should be titrated to desired effect.

Premix with atropine or glycopyrolate.

Lower in neonates.