CHAPTER 5 Schizophrenia and related disorders
Schizophrenia is a disorder which affects roughly 1 in 200 people, and which can have a profound effect upon the individual and their families. The term schizophrenia refers to a ‘splitting of the psychic functions’, and not, as is commonly believed, to a ‘split personality’. Key aspects of the disorder are shown in Box 5.1.
Clinical features
The signs and symptoms of the disorder are most usefully divided into:



There is no specific laboratory or radiological test for schizophrenia, and none of the signs or symptoms outlined above are pathognomonic. However, the ‘first rank’ symptoms elucidated by Schneider (Box 5.2) have some degree of diagnostic specificity, and are useful to ask for in the clinical interview.
BOX 5.2 Schneider’s ‘first rank’ symptoms of schizophrenia
Auditory hallucinatory experiences
Delusional perception
There is a normal percept to which an ‘un-understandable’ delusional attribution is given.
Permeability of ego boundaries
(Castle & Buckley 2008, with permission)
Negative symptoms can sometimes be ‘mimicked’ by depression, positive symptoms or the extrapyramidal side effects of antipsychotic medication. It is always important to treat the underlying cause, as shown in Table 5.1.
TABLE 5.1 Primary and secondary negative symptoms, and treatment
Management | ||
---|---|---|
Primary | Use atypical antipsychotic; consider adjunctive treatments; if persistent, consider clozapine | |
Secondary | To depression | Antidepressant medication (SSRI or mirtazapine) |
To positive symptoms | Optimise treatment of positive symptoms: pharmacological and psychosocial approaches should be explored | |
To D2 receptor blockade | Consider atypical antipsychotic; if persistent extrapyramidal side effects on atypical antipsychotic, consider adjunctive anticholinergic agent |
(Castle & Buckley 2008, with permission)
Not all signs and symptoms occur in any one individual at any one time: different patients show different features and these might change over the course of the illness. Table 5.2 shows the cardinal features of schizophrenia according to DSM–IVTR and ICD–10. It will be noted that there is considerable overlap between these two constructs: the main difference is that DSM–IVTR requires a 6-month duration: disorders with the characteristic symptoms but shorter duration are labelled schizophreniform disorder.
TABLE 5.2 DSM–IVTR and ICD–10 diagnoses of schizophrenia
DSM–IVTR (synopsis) | ICD–10 (synopsis) |
---|---|
Symptoms (at least 1 month unless successfully treated): |
(Castle & Buckley 2008, with permission)
Differential diagnosis
‘Organic’ psychoses
Schizophrenia cannot be diagnosed if there are clear organic factors causing the symptoms and signs: this is labelled an organic psychosis. Exclusion of reversible organic causes (e.g. brain tumour) is obviously important in clinical practice, but it can be much more difficult to assess the role of illicit substances, which are commonly used by people with schizophrenia. A label of drug-induced psychosis is only appropriate if there is:
Pervasive developmental disorders
Pervasive developmental disorders (e.g. autism, Asperger’s syndrome (see Ch 16)) are characterised by abnormalities in social interactions, and a restricted and stereotyped range of interests and activities, evident from before 3 years of age.
Axis II disorders
Some of the cluster A DSM–IVTR Axis II (personality) disorders (see Ch 12) could be considered formes fruste of schizophrenia. The most obvious is schizotypal personality disorder, characterised by longstanding eccentricity, social withdrawal and odd beliefs. It is placed on Axis II in DSM–IVTR, but is probably genetically linked to schizophrenia, and sometimes evolves into full-blown schizophrenia.
Subtypes of schizophrenia
Many attempts have been made at subtyping schizophrenia, mostly on the basis of phenomenology and/or longitudinal course. DSM–IVTR and ICD–10 subtypes are shown in Box 5.3. Probably the best validated of these is the paranoid subtype.
Comorbidity
Depression is common in people with schizophrenia. Recognition and treatment are critical, as depression is treatable, and if untreated can lead to an extra burden for the individual, and is associated with suicide (which itself is much more common in people with schizophrenia than the general population). Depression can be difficult to dis-entangle from negative symptoms and demoralisation. Features that suggest a depressive disorder include vegetative symptoms (e.g. anorexia, insomnia); functional shift symptoms (e.g. mood worse in the morning; early morning wakening); guilty feelings; and suicidality. Treatment of depression in schizophrenia follows roughly the same approach as for depression generally (see Chs 6 and 13).
Of the anxiety disorders, panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have all been shown to occur in excess in association with schizophrenia. OCD is particularly also associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics, notably clozapine. Anxiety disorder comorbidities can worsen the long-term course of schizophrenia, and need to be screened for and treated on their own merits: psychological and pharmacological treatments proven effective for these disorders not occurring comorbidly are often effective (see Ch 8).
Substance abuse is common in schizophrenia (around 40–60%). Alcohol is the most widely used substance, followed by cannabis. The negative impacts of substance use in schizophrenia are shown in Box 5.4.
BOX 5.4 Impact of problematic substance use on outcomes in schizophrenia
(Castle & Buckley 2008, with permission)
CASE EXAMPLES: schizophrenia and related disorders
First onset schizophrenia
A 17-year-old boy was brought for a medical consultation because he had been behaving oddly. Over the previous 8 months he had been spending most of his time alone in his room, his self-care had been poor, and he had been up all night on the internet. He had been sleeping most of the day and had abandoned his studies. Increasingly, he had been isolating himself and did not want to have anything to do with his friends. More recently, he had been talking to himself and had stopped eating prepared food, saying it is poisoned: he would eat only canned food, which he insisted on opening himself.
Epidemiology
The World Health Organization (WHO) undertook two influential studies that showed rates of schizophrenia to be similar in a number of developed and developing countries; the incidence rates were between 7 and 14 new cases per 100,000 per year. Also of interest was an overall better outcome in developing countries. Prevalence studies (i.e. reporting the number of cases in a given population at a given point in time—point prevalence; or over a set period—period prevalence) have also been remarkably similar, when they have used appropriate methods, including operational criteria for diagnosis. Modern general population studies from the US, the UK and Australia have all reported prevalence rates of around 0.5–1.5%; the lower figure is more consistent with the total international literature. Another way of expressing these figures is that of lifetime morbid risk—that is, the risk at birth of anyone developing the illness, all else being equal. This is usually rounded to 0.5–1.0%.
Rates of schizophrenia do vary at a city or even neighbourhood level, with a well-established association with social deprivation. This is partly due to ‘drift’ of vulnerable people down the social strata, and partly to a ‘toxic’ effect of city upbringing. Also, migrants are at greater risk of schizophrenia: black migrants in predominantly white cultures are particularly at risk (e.g. African-Caribbeans in the UK). Interestingly, this elevated risk also pertains to British-born African-Caribbeans.
Outcome
Schizophrenia has a variable long-term course, with roughly a quarter of cases having a single episode and returning to good psychosocial functioning; around a third having an episodic course with reasonably good intermorbid functioning; and 40% tending to have a poor outcome. Certain factors do tend to be associated with a poor outcome in schizophrenia. Some of these are potentially remediable, while others are not (see Box 5.5). Particular recent interest has been shown in early intervention, but whether this ameliorates the long-term course is still unclear.
Aetiology
Genetic factors
Genetic causality is well established in schizophrenia, with family studies and adoption studies all confirming an increased risk in biological relatives of people with schizophrenia (rates are roughly 10% in siblings, including dizygotic twins, 50% in monozygotic twins, 15% if one parent is affected, and around 50% if both parents are affected). Inheritance is certainly non-Mendelian, and there is no single schizophrenia gene, but rather multiple genes of small effect. Genes that have attracted attention and have shown some evidence of linkage in some samples include some associated with neurodevelopment (e.g. dysbindin, dysregulin) and with the metabolism of dopamine, notably catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT).
Environmental factors
The fact that monozygotic twins are only 50% concordant for schizophrenia shows that non-genetic or ‘environmental’ factors must also operate to increase risk. The main putative factors are shown in Box 5.6. It should be stressed that none of these factors independently cause schizophrenia, and that they have only modest effects on risk: presumably they act on individuals who already carry some genetic vulnerability.
Schizophrenia as a brain disease
That some people with schizophrenia show subtle brain structural abnormalities is beyond doubt, with the most common findings of neuroimaging studies shown in Box 5.7. However, there is a great degree of overlap with ‘normals’ and no single neuroimaging finding is pathognomonic. These structural abnormalities seem to be evident even at the onset of illness, though some progression might occur over the course of the disorder.
The neurodevelopmental model
The neurodevelopmental model posits that schizophrenia has its roots in aberrant development of the brain, but that positive symptoms only manifest in late teens/early adulthood when the brain develops the capacity to produce such symptoms. This model is consonant with findings that even in early life people who later develop schizophrenia are at greater risk of delayed motor, verbal and social milestones. The model also gains support from findings that people with schizophrenia are more likely than ‘normals’ to have physical abnormalities such as high arched palate, low set ears, widely spaced eyes and unusual fingerprint patterns; these are thought to reflect early neurodevelopmental deviance.
Neurochemistry
Dopaminergic mechanisms
The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia has its roots in observations that dopaminergic agonists can cause (positive) psychotic symptoms, and that drugs that ameliorate such symptoms block dopamine D2 receptors (in mesolimbic tracts). An expansion of the theory suggests that negative symptoms are caused by dopamine deficit in mesocortical pathways. But the issue is complex, and other neurotransmitter systems have also been implicated.
Serotonergic mechanisms
Serotonergic mechanisms have also been of interest in schizophrenia, in part because the serotonergic agonist lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is an hallucinogen, but also because most of the ‘atypical’ antipsychotic agents block serotonin 5HT-2 receptors (see Ch 13).
Management
Treatment summary: schizophrenia
To maintain them in the community, people with schizophrenia require a long-term treatment plan that encompasses biological and psychosocial domains. A multidisciplinary team is usually required, with each professional bringing their own expertise, but with a coordinating case manager who can ensure consistency and comprehensiveness of interventions. In those with severe illness and multiple problems, intensive case management, with the capacity to provide a high level of face-to-face contact (up to twice daily if required), can be beneficial and reduce hospitalisations.
Biological treatments
Antipsychotic medication is the mainstay of the treatment of people with schizophrenia. These drugs are described in Chapter 13. One of the major challenges for clinicians is to ensure patients (who often lack insight into their need for treatment) actually take their medication as prescribed. The provision of adequate information regarding the rationale for and potential side effects of the medication is key in this. Some patients benefit from more structured adherence therapy. For those who perennially do not adhere and thus continue to relapse, a long-acting injectable (‘depot’) form of antipsychotic can be considered.
Vocational aspects
Most people with schizophrenia do not have paid employment. In part this is a consequence of the positive, negative and cognitive symptoms of the illness itself, compounded by medication side effects such as sedation. But workplaces are often ‘unfriendly’ to people with schizophrenia, and working with potential employers and supporting the patient in the workplace can be helpful. Supported employment can be augmented by cognitive remediation, and social firms (part-owned by people with a mental illness, and with a specified proportion of employees living with a mental illness) offer particular support structures.
References and further reading
Castle D.J., Buckley P.F. Schizophrenia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Castle D.J., Copolov D., Wykes T., Mueser K., editors. Pharmacological and psychosocial treatments in schizophrenia, 2nd edn, London: Informa Healthcare, 2007.
Crow T.J. Positive and negative symptoms and the role of dopamine in schizophrenia. British Medical Journal. 1980;346:383-386.
Green A.I., Canusa C.M., Brenner M.J., et al. Recognition and management of comorbidity in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2003;26:115-139.
Harrison P.J., Weinberger D.R. Schizophrenia genes, gene expression and neuropathology: on the matter of their convergence. Molecular Psychiatry. 2005;10:40-68.
Hoenig J. The concept of schizophrenia: Kraepelin, Bleuler, Schneider. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1983;142:547-556.
Jablensky A, Sartorious N, Ernberg G et al 1992 Schizophrenia: manifestation, incidence and course in different cultures. Psychological Medicine Monograph 20
Jones P.B., Buckley P.F. Schizophrenia. London: Elsevier; 2006.
Liddle P., Carpenter W.T., Crow T. Syndromes of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1994;165:721-727.
Lieberman J., Stroup T.S., McEvoy J.P., et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;353:1209-1223.
Murray R.M., O’Callaghan E., Castle D.J., Lewis S.W. A neurodevelopmental approach to the classification of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1992;18:319-332.
Zubin J., Spring B. Vulnerability: a new view of schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1977;86:103-126.