Safety in the Immunology-Serology Laboratory

Published on 09/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Allergy and Immunology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1.5 (4 votes)

This article have been viewed 10122 times

Safety in the Immunology-Serology Laboratory

In the immunology-serology laboratory, precautions must be taken to prevent accidental exposure to infectious diseases and other laboratory hazards. Clinical laboratory personnel are routinely exposed to potential hazards in their daily activities. The importance of safety and correct first aid procedures cannot be overemphasized. Many accidents do not just happen; they are caused by carelessness or lack of proper communication. For this reason, the practice of safety should be uppermost in the mind of any worker in a clinical laboratory. This chapter presents safety issues that are applicable to the immunology-serology laboratory.

Safety Standards and Agencies

Safety standards for clinical laboratories are initiated, governed, and reviewed by several agencies or committees. These include the following:

The primary purpose of OSHA standards is to ensure safe and healthful working conditions for every U.S. worker. To ensure that workers have safe and healthful working conditions, the federal government passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and, in 1988, expanded the Hazard Communication Standard to apply to hospital staff. Occupational Safety and Health Act regulations apply to all businesses with one or more employees and are administered by the U.S. Department of Labor through OSHA. The programs deal with many aspects of safety and health protection, including compliance arrangements, inspection procedures, penalties for noncompliance, complaint procedures, duties and responsibilities for administration and operation of the system, and how the standards are set. Responsibility for compliance is placed on the administration of the institution and the employee.

OSHA standards, where appropriate, include provisions for warning labels or other appropriate forms of warning to alert all workers to potential hazards, suitable protective equipment, exposure control procedures, and implementation of training and education programs. In 1991, OSHA mandated that all clinical laboratories must implement a chemical hygiene plan and an exposure control plan. As part of the chemical hygiene plan, a copy of the material safety data sheet (MSDS) must be on file and readily accessible and available to all employees at all times. The MSDS describes hazards, safe handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous chemicals. Information is provided by chemical manufacturers and suppliers about each chemical and accompanies the shipment of each chemical. Each MSDS contains basic information about the specific chemical or product, including its trade name, chemical name and synonyms, chemical family, manufacturer’s name and address, emergency telephone number for further information about the chemical, hazardous ingredients, physical data, fire and explosion data, and health hazard and protection information. The MSDS describes the effects of overexposure or exceeding the threshold limit value of allowable exposure for an employee in an 8-hour day. The MSDS also describes protective personal clothing and equipment requirements, first aid practices, spill information, and disposal procedures.

In 2006, the CDC introduced the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). This voluntary system integrates a number of surveillance systems and provides data on devices, patients, and staff. Many hospitals have reorganized the physical layout of handwashing stations (see later, “Handwashing”) to prevent the spread of pathogens.

Adherence to general safety practices will reduce the risk of inadvertent contamination with blood or body fluids, as follows:

Each laboratory must have an up to date safety manual. This manual should contain a comprehensive listing of approved policies, acceptable practices, and precautions, including Standard Blood and Body Fluid Precautions. Specific standards that conform to current state and federal requirements (e.g., OSHA regulations) must be included in the manual.

Prevention of Transmission of Infectious Diseases

According to the CDC concept of Standard Precautions, all human blood and other body fluids are treated as potentially infectious for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and other blood-borne microorganisms that can cause disease in human beings. Compliance with the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard and the Occupational Exposure Standard is required to provide a safe work environment. OSHA mandates that the employer do the following:

Blood is the most important source of HIV, HBV, and other bloodborne pathogens in the occupational setting. HBV can be present in extraordinarily high concentrations in blood, but HIV is usually found in lower concentrations. HBV may be stable in dried blood and blood products at 25° C for up to 7 days. HIV retains infectivity for more than 3 days in dried specimens at room temperature and for more than 1 week in an aqueous environment at room temperature.

Both HBV and HIV may be transmitted indirectly. Viral transmission can result from contact with inanimate objects, such as work surfaces or equipment contaminated with infected blood or certain body fluids. If the virus is transferred to the skin or mucous membranes by hand contact between a contaminated surface and nonintact skin or mucous membranes, it can produce viral exposure.

Medical personnel must remember that HBV and HIV are different diseases caused by unrelated viruses. The most feared hazard of all, the transmission of HIV through occupational exposure, is among the least likely to occur. The modes of transmission for HBV and HIV are similar, but the potential for transmission in the occupational setting is greater for HBV than HIV.

The transmission of hepatitis B can also be fatal and it is more probable than transmission of HIV. The number of cases of acute hepatitis among health care workers because of occupational exposure has sharply declined since hepatitis B vaccine became available in 1982. The likelihood of infection in health care workers after exposure to blood infected with HBV or HIV depends on the following factors:

Both HBV and HIV may be directly transmitted by various portals of entry. In the occupational setting, however, the following situations may lead to infection:

Most exposures do not result in infection. The risk varies not only with the type of exposure but also with the amount of infected blood in the exposure, the length of contact with the infectious material, and the amount of virus in the patient’s blood or body fluid or tissue at exposure. Studies have reported that the average risk of HIV transmission is approximately 0.3% after percutaneous exposure to HIV-infected blood and 0.09% after mucous membrane exposure.

Safe Work Practices for Infection Control

The use of CDC Standard Precautions is an approach to infection control that prevents occupational exposures to blood-borne pathogens. It eliminates the need for separate isolation procedures for patients known or suspected to be infectious. The application of Standard Precautions also eliminates the need for warning labels on specimens.

OSHA requires laboratories to have a personal protective equipment (PPE) program. The components of this regulation include the following:

Laboratory personnel should not rely solely on PPE to protect themselves against hazards. They should also apply PPE standards when using various forms of safety protection.

A clear policy on institutionally required Standard Precautions is needed. For usual laboratory activities, PPE consists of gloves and a laboratory coat or gown; other equipment such as masks would normally not be needed. Standard Precautions are intended to supplement rather than replace handwashing recommendations for routine infection control. The risk of nosocomial transmission of HBV, HIV, and other bloodborne pathogens can be minimized if laboratory personnel are aware of and adhere to essential safety guidelines.

Protective Techniques for Infection Control

Selection and Use of Gloves

Gloves for medical use are sterile surgical or nonsterile examination gloves made of vinyl or latex. There are no reported differences in barrier effectiveness between intact latex and intact vinyl gloves. Tactile differences have been observed between the two types of gloves, with latex gloves providing more tactile sensitivity; however, either type is usually satisfactory for phlebotomy and as a protective barrier during technical procedures. Latex-free gloves should be available for personnel with sensitivity to usual glove material. Rubber household gloves may be used for cleaning procedures.

General guidelines related to the selection and general use of gloves include the following:

1. Use sterile gloves for procedures involving contact with normally sterile areas of the body or during procedures in which sterility has been established and must be maintained.

2. Use nonsterile examination gloves for procedures that do not require the use of sterile gloves. Gloves must be worn when receiving phlebotomy training. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health mandates the use of gloves for phlebotomy.

3. Gloves should be changed between each patient contact.

4. Wear gloves when processing blood specimens, reagents, or blood products, including reagent red blood cells.

5. Gloves should be changed frequently and immediately if they become visibly contaminated with blood or certain body fluids or if physical damage occurs.

6. Do not wash or disinfect latex or vinyl gloves for reuse. Washing with detergents may cause increased penetration of liquids through undetected holes in the gloves. Rubber gloves may be decontaminated and reused, but disinfectants may cause deterioration. Rubber gloves should be discarded if they have punctures, tears, or evidence of deterioration or if they peel, crack, or become discolored.

7. Using items potentially contaminated with human blood or certain body fluids (e.g., specimen containers, laboratory instruments, countertops)

Care must be taken to avoid indirect contamination of work surfaces or objects in the work area. Gloves should be properly removed (Fig. 6-1) or covered with an uncontaminated glove or paper towel before answering the telephone, handling laboratory equipment, or touching doorknobs.

Laboratory Coats or Gowns as Barrier Protection

A color-coded, two–laboratory coat or equivalent system should be used whenever laboratory personnel are working with potentially infectious specimens. The garment worn in the laboratory must be changed or covered with an uncontaminated coat when leaving the immediate work area. Garments should be changed immediately if grossly contaminated with blood or body fluids to prevent seepage through to street clothes or skin. Contaminated coats or gowns should be placed in an appropriately designated biohazard bag for laundering. Disposable plastic aprons are recommended if blood or certain body fluids may be splashed. Aprons should be discarded into a biohazard container.

The introduction of water-retardant gowns has been the greatest change in many PPE practices.

Handwashing

Frequent handwashing is an important safety precaution. It should be performed after contact with patients and laboratory specimens (Box 6-1). Gloves should be used as an adjunct to, not a substitute for, handwashing.

Box 6-1   Guidelines for Handwashing and Hand Antisepsis in Health Care Settings

• Wash hands with a nonantimicrobial soap and water or an antimicrobial soap and water when hands are visibly dirty or contaminated with proteinaceous material.

• If hands are not visibly soiled, use an alcohol-based waterless antiseptic agent for routinely decontaminating hands in all other clinical situations.

• Waterless antiseptic agents are highly preferable, but hand antisepsis using an antimicrobial soap may be considered in settings in which time constraints are not an issue and easy access to hand hygiene facilities can be ensured, or in rare cases when a caregiver is intolerant of the waterless antiseptic product used in the institution.

• Decontaminate hands after contact with a patient’s intact skin.

• Decontaminate hands after contact with body fluids or excretions, mucous membranes, nonintact skin, or wound dressings, as long as hands are not visibly soiled.

• Decontaminate hands if moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during patient care.

• Decontaminate hands after contact with inanimate objects in the immediate vicinity of the patient.

• Decontaminate hands before caring for patients with severe neutropenia or other forms of severe immune suppression.

• Decontaminate hands after removing gloves.

Adapted from Boyce JM, Pittet D; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee; HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force: Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Association for Professionals in Infection Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America., MMWR Recomm Rep 51(RR-16):1–45, 2002.

The efficacy of handwashing in reducing the transmission of microbial organisms has been demonstrated. At the very minimum, hands should be washed with soap and water (if visibly soiled) or by hand antisepsis with an alcohol-based handrub (if not visibly soiled) in the following situations:

1. After completing laboratory work and before leaving the laboratory

2. After removing gloves. The Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology has reported that extreme variability exists in the quality of gloves, with leakage in 4% to 63% of vinyl gloves and in 3% to 52% of latex gloves.

3. Before eating, drinking, applying makeup, and changing contact lenses, and before and after using the bathroom

4. Before all activities that involve hand contact with mucous membranes or breaks in the skin

5. Immediately after accidental skin contact with blood, body fluids, or tissues

Two important points in the practice of hand hygiene technique follow (see Box 6-1):

Specimen-Processing Protection

Specimens should be transported to the laboratory in plastic leakproof bags. Protective gloves should always be worn for handling any type of biological specimen.

Substances can become airborne when the stopper (cap) is popped off a blood-collecting container, a serum sample is poured from one tube to another, or a serum tube is centrifuged. When the cap is being removed from a specimen tube or a blood collection tube, the top should be covered with a disposable gauze pad or special protective pad. Gauze pads with an impermeable plastic coating on one side can reduce contamination of gloves. The tube should be held away from the body and the cap gently twisted to remove it. Snapping off the cap or top can cause some of the contents to aerosolize. When not in place on the tube, the cap should still be kept in the gauze and not placed directly on the work surface or countertop.

Specially constructed plastic splash shields are used in many laboratories for the processing of blood specimens. The tube caps are removed behind or under the shield, which acts as a barrier between the worker and specimen tube. This is designed to prevent aerosols from entering the nose, eyes, or mouth. Laboratory safety boxes are commercially available and can be used for unstoppering tubes or doing other procedures that might cause spattering. Splash shields and safety boxes should be periodically decontaminated.

When specimens are being centrifuged, the tube caps should always be kept on the tubes. Centrifuge covers must be used and left on until the centrifuge stops. The centrifuge should be allowed to stop by itself and should not be manually stopped by the worker.

Another step to lessen the hazard from aerosols is to exercise caution in handling pipettes and other equipment used to transfer human specimens, especially pathogenic materials. These materials should be discarded properly and carefully.

Additional Laboratory Hazards

It cannot be overemphasized that clinical laboratories present many potential hazards simply because of the nature of the work done. In addition to biologic hazards, other hazards in the clinical laboratory include open flames, electrical equipment, glassware, chemicals of varying reactivity, flammable solvents, and toxic fumes.

In addition to the safety practices common to all laboratory situations, certain procedures are mandatory in a medical laboratory. Proper procedures for the handling and disposal of toxic, radioactive, and potentially carcinogenic materials must be included in the safety manual. Information regarding the hazards of particular substances must be included as a safety practice and to comply with the legal right of workers to know about the hazards associated with these substances. Some chemicals (e.g., benzidine) previously used in the laboratory are now known to be carcinogenic and have been replaced with safer chemicals.

Decontamination of Work Surfaces, Equipment, and Spills

Sodium hypochlorite solutions are inexpensive and effective broad-spectrum germicidal solutions. Generic sources of sodium hypochlorite include household chlorine bleach. Concentrations of 1:10 to 1:100 free chlorine are effective, depending on the amount of organic material present on the surface to be cleaned and disinfected. Many chlorine bleaches (available at grocery stores) are not registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for use as surface disinfectants and are unacceptable surface disinfectants. The EPA encourages the use of registered products because the agency reviews them for safety and performance when the products are used according to label instructions. When unregistered products are used for surface disinfection, users do so at their own risk. EPA-registered chemical germicides may be more compatible with certain materials that could be corroded by repeated exposure to sodium hypochlorite, especially the 1:10 dilution.

While wearing gloves, all work surfaces should be cleaned and sanitized at the beginning and end of the shift with a 1:10 dilution of household bleach. Instruments such as scissors or centrifuge carriages should be sanitized daily with a diluted solution of bleach. It is equally important to clean and disinfect work areas frequently during the workday and before and after each shift. Studies have demonstrated that HIV is inactivated rapidly after being exposed to common chemical germicides at concentrations much lower than used in practice. Diluted household bleach prepared daily inactivates HBV in 10 minutes and HIV in 2 minutes. Disposable materials contaminated with blood must be placed in containers marked “Biohazard” and properly discarded.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV), HBV, and HIV have never been documented as being transmitted from a housekeeping surface (e.g., countertops). However, an area contaminated by blood or body fluids needs to be treated as potentially hazardous and requires prompt removal and surface disinfection.

Strategies differ for decontaminating spills of blood and other body fluids, based on the setting. The cleanup procedure depends on the porosity of the surface and volume of the spill. The following protocol is recommended for managing spills in a clinical laboratory:

Decontaminate nondisposable equipment by soaking overnight in a dilute (1:10) bleach solution and rinsing with methyl alcohol and water before reuse. Disposable glassware or supplies that have come into contact with blood should be autoclaved or incinerated. Staff should receive training in environmental surface and infection control strategies and procedures as part of an overall infection control and safety program.

Disposal of Infectious Laboratory Waste

The control of infectious, chemical, and radioactive waste is regulated by a variety of government agencies, including OSHA and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Legislation and regulations that affect laboratories include the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, clean air and water laws, right to know laws, and HazCom (chemical hazard communication). Laboratories should implement applicable federal, state, and local laws that pertain to hazardous material and waste management by establishing safety policies. Laboratories with multiple agencies should follow the guidelines of the most stringent agency. Safety policies should be reviewed and signed annually or whenever a change is instituted. Employers are responsible for ensuring that personnel follow the safety policies.

OSHA has defined infectious waste as blood and blood products, contaminated sharps, pathologic wastes, and microbiological wastes. Infectious waste is packaged for disposal in color-coded containers and labeled as such with the standard symbol for a biohazard (Fig. 6-2).

Infectious waste (e.g., contaminated gauze squares and test tubes) must be discarded into proper biohazard containers with the following features:

Containers for Waste

Containers must be easily accessible to personnel needing them and must be located in the laboratory areas in which they are typically used. They should be constructed so that their contents will not spill out if the container is tipped over accidentally.

Biohazard Containers

Body fluid specimens, including blood, must be placed in well-constructed biohazard containers with secure lids to prevent leakage during transport and for future disposal. Contaminated specimens and other materials used in laboratory tests should be decontaminated before reprocessing for disposal or should be placed in special impervious bags for disposal, in accordance with established waste removal policies. If outside contamination of the bag is likely, a second bag should be used.

Hazardous specimens and potentially hazardous substances should be tagged and identified as such. The tag should read “Biohazard,” or the biological hazard symbol should be used. All persons working in the laboratory area must be informed about the meaning of these tags and precautions to take for each.

Contaminated equipment must be placed in a designated area for storage, washing, decontamination, or disposal. With the increased use of disposable PPE (e.g., gloves), the volume of waste for disposal will increase.

Biohazard Bags

Although rigid impermeable containers are used for the disposal of sharps and broken glassware, plastic bags are appropriate for the disposal of most infectious waste materials. Plastic bags with the biohazard symbol and lettering prominently visible can be used in secondary metal or plastic containers. These containers can be decontaminated or disposed of regularly, or immediately when visibly contaminated. These biohazard bags should be used for all blood, body fluids, tissues, and other disposable materials contaminated with infectious agents and should be handled with gloves.

If the primary infectious waste containers are red plastic bags, they should be kept in secondary metal or plastic cans. Extreme care should be taken not to contaminate the exterior of these bags. If they do become contaminated on the outside, the entire bag must be placed into another red plastic bag. Secondary plastic or metal cans should be decontaminated regularly, and immediately after any grossly visible contamination, with an agent such as a 1:10 solution of household bleach.

Disease Prevention

Immunization

A well-planned and implemented immunization program is an important component of a health care organization’s infection prevention and control program. When planning these programs, valuable resources are available from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). The characteristics of the health care workers employed and the individuals served should be considered, as well as the requirements of regulatory agencies and local, state, and federal regulations.

In their recommendations for the immunization of health care workers, ACIP and HICPAC identify those health care workers whose maintenance of immune status is especially important, which includes laboratory staff. Other individuals are recognized as being at risk for exposure to and possible transmission of diseases that can be prevented by immunizations. The ACIP-HICPAC recommendations are divided into the following three categories:

All health care organizations should include the strongly recommended immunizations. To determine whether to include other immunologic agents, the incidence of the vaccine-preventable diseases in the community served needs to be reviewed. Also, comparing the demographics of the workforce pool with the disease pattern in the community will determine which of these immunologic agents is (are) indicated for the specific organization’s program. Other vaccines may not be routinely administered but may be considered after an injury or exposure incident or for immunocompromised or older health care workers.

The ACIP-HICPAC recommendations determine which vaccines to include based on documented nosocomial transmission and significant risk for acquiring or transmitting the following vaccine-preventable diseases:

Optional immunizations include hepatitis A, diphtheria, pneumococcal disease, and tetanus. Because health care workers are not at greater risk for acquiring these diseases than the general population, they should seek recommendations for these immunizations from their primary care provider.

Screening Tests

Purified Protein Derivative Tuberculin Skin Test

If recently exposed to an individual with active tuberculosis (TB) infection, a health care worker may not yet have a positive TB skin test reaction. The worker may need a second skin test 10 to 12 weeks after the last exposure to the infected person. It can take several weeks after infection for the immune system to react to this purified protein derivative (PPD, Mantoux) tuberculin skin test. If the reaction to the second test is negative, the worker probably does not have latent TB infection. Strongly positive reactors, with a skin test diameter more than 15 mm and symptoms suggestive of TB, should be evaluated clinically and microbiologically. Two sputum specimens, collected on successive days, should be investigated for TB by microscopy and culture.

Postexposure Prophylaxis

Although the most important strategy for reducing the risk of occupational HIV transmission is to prevent occupational exposures, plans for postexposure management of health care personnel should be in place. The U.S. Public Health Service has issued guidelines for the management of health care personnel exposure to HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP).

These guidelines outline considerations in determining whether health care personnel should receive PEP and in choosing the type of PEP regimen. For most HIV exposures that warrant PEP, a basic 4-week, two-drug regimen is recommended. For HIV exposures that pose an increased risk of transmission, a three-drug regimen may be recommended.

Special circumstances are also discussed in the guidelines, including delayed exposure report, unknown source person, pregnancy in an exposed woman, resistance of the source virus to antiviral agents, and toxicity of PEP regimens. Occupational exposures should be considered urgent medical concerns.

Hepatitis B Virus Exposure

After occupational exposure to Hepatitis B virus (HBV), appropriate and timely prophylaxis can prevent HBV infection and subsequent development of chronic infection or liver disease. The mainstay of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is Hepatitis B vaccine. In certain circumstances, Hepatitis B immune globulin is recommended in addition to vaccine for added protection.

After skin or mucosal exposure to blood, the ACIP recommends immunoprophylaxis, depending on several factors. If an individual has not been vaccinated, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is usually given for temporary protection, i.e., 3 to 6 months. It should be administered within 24 hours if practical, and concurrently with hepatitis B vaccine postexposure injuries. Recommendations for HBV postexposure management include initiation of the hepatitis B vaccine series to any susceptible, unvaccinated person who sustains an occupational blood or body fluid exposure. Both passive-active PEP with HBIG and hepatitis B vaccination and active PEP with hepatitis B vaccination alone have been demonstrated to be highly effective in preventing transmission after exposure to HBV.

PEP with HBIG and hepatitis B vaccine series should be considered for occupational exposures after evaluation of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) status of the source and the vaccination and vaccine-response status of the exposed person. The specific protocol for these measures is determined by the institution’s infection control division. Postvaccination testing for the development of antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBsAg) for persons at occupational risk who may have had needlestick exposures necessitating PEP should be done to ensure that the vaccination has been successful.

In cases of non-occupational exposure to hepatitis B virus (HBV) through a discrete, identifiable exposure to blood or body fluids, the suggested CDC protocol is as follows:

HBsAg-Positive Exposure Source

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Transmission of HIV is believed to result from intimate contact with blood and body fluids from an infected person. Casual contact with infected persons has not been documented as a mode of transmission. If there has been occupational exposure to a potentially HIV-infected specimen or patient, the antibody status of the patient or specimen source should be determined, if it is not already known. If the source is a patient, voluntary consent should be obtained, if possible, for testing for HIV antibodies as soon as possible. High-risk exposure prophylaxis includes the use of a combination of antiretroviral agents to prevent seroconversion.

The CDC bases PEP guidelines on the determined risks of transmission, stratified as highest risk, increased risk, and no risk. Highest risk exists when there has been occupational exposure to a large volume of blood (e.g., a deep percutaneous injury or cut with a large-diameter hollow needle previously used in source patient’s vein or artery) and to blood containing a high titer of HIV (known as a high viral load), to fluids containing visible blood, or to specific other potentially infectious fluids or tissue, including semen, vaginal secretions, and cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, and amniotic fluids.

If a known or suspected parenteral exposure takes place, a technician or technologist may request follow-up monitoring for HBV or HIV antibodies. This monitoring and follow-up counseling must be provided free of charge. If voluntary informed consent is obtained, the source of the potentially infectious material and the technician or technologist should be tested immediately. The laboratory technologist should also be tested at intervals after exposure. An injury report must be filed after parenteral exposure.

An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) screening test is used to detect antibodies to HIV. Before any HIV result is considered positive, the result is confirmed by Western blot (WB) analysis. A negative antibody test for HIV does not confirm the absence of virus. There is a window period after HIV infection during which detectable antibody is not present. In these patients, detection of antigen is important; a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for HIV DNA can be used for this purpose and a p24 antigen test is used for screening blood donors for HIV antigen.

If the source patient is seronegative, the exposed worker should be screened for antibody again at 3 and 6 months. If the source patient is at high risk for HIV infection, more extensive follow-up of both the worker and source patient may be needed.

If the source patient or specimen is HIV-positive (HIV antibodies, WB, HIV antigen, or HIV DNA by PCR), the blood of the exposed worker should be tested for HIV antibodies within 48 hours, if possible. Exposed workers who are initially seronegative for the HIV antibody should be tested again 6 weeks after exposure. If this test is negative, the worker should be tested again at 12 weeks and 6 months after exposure. Most reported seroconversions have occurred between 6 and 12 weeks after exposure. PEP should be started immediately and according to policies set by the institution’s infection control program. A policy of “hit hard, hit early” should generally be in place.

During the early follow-up after exposure, especially the first 6 to 12 weeks, the worker should follow the recommendations of the CDC regarding the transmission of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), as follows:

The exposed worker should be advised of and alerted to the risks of infection and evaluated medically for any history, signs, or symptoms consistent with HIV infection. Serologic testing for HIV antibodies should be made available to all health care workers who are concerned that they may have been infected with HIV.

Occupational exposures should be considered urgent medical concerns to ensure timely postexposure management and administration of HBIG, hepatitis B vaccine, and HIV PEP.

Basic First Aid Procedures

Because there are so many potential hazards in a clinical laboratory, knowledge of basic first aid should be an integral part of any educational program. A key rule in dealing with laboratory emergencies is to keep calm, which may not always be easy but is important to the victim’s well-being. Keep crowds of people away, and give the victim plenty of fresh air. Because injuries can be extreme and immediate care is critical, application of the proper first aid procedures must be thoroughly understood by every person in the medical laboratory.

In serious laboratory accidents, medical assistance should be summoned while first aid is being administered. For general accidents, competent medical help should be sought as soon as possible after the first aid treatment has been completed. In cases of chemical burns, especially involving the eyes, rapid treatment is essential.

Remember that first aid is useful not only in your working environment, but also at home and in your community. It deserves your earnest attention and study.

CASE STUDY IN SAFETY

Ms. MM was a new employee in a rural laboratory. When she started to work, she wiped down the work bench with 5% bleach and donned latex gloves that she had rinsed off the night before. When she opened up a specimen (a red top tube), a small amount of serum spilled out of the tube. She promptly wiped it up with a sterile paper towel and discarded the paper towel into a cardboard box marked “Biohazard.” When it was lunchtime, she removed her gloves, discarded them in the biohazard container and left the laboratory to go to the cafeteria. Her lab coat was clean, so she did not remove it to go to lunch. On returning from lunch, MM put on clean gloves and worked until the end of the shift. She discarded her gloves into the biosafety box and hung her lab coat on a hook in the laboratory.

Questions

See Appendix A for the answers to these questions.

Chapter Highlights

• Clinical laboratories have instituted Standard Blood and Body Fluid Precautions, or Standard Precautions, to prevent parenteral, mucous membrane, and nonintact skin exposures of health care workers to bloodborne pathogens such as HIV and HBV.

• Although HIV has been isolated from blood, semen, vaginal secretions, saliva, tears, breast milk, cerebrospinal fluid, amniotic fluid, and urine, only blood, semen, vaginal secretions, and possibly breast milk have been implicated in the transmission of HIV to date.

• Medical personnel should be aware that HBV and HIV are different diseases caused by unrelated viruses. The most feared hazard of all, the transmission of HIV through occupational exposure, is among the least likely to occur if proper safety practices are followed.

• The control of infectious, chemical, and radioactive waste is regulated by various governmental agencies (e.g., OSHA, FDA).