Ropes and Knot Tying

Published on 24/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2.9 (29 votes)

This article have been viewed 3653 times

Chapter 95 Ropes and Knot Tying

Ropes—and the knots that hold them in place—are considered by many to be staples of the avid outdoorsperson. Ropes are commonly used for lashing down equipment, setting up tents, and stowing food in trees to protect it from bears as well as for wilderness adventure activities like climbing and caving. During an emergency, a rope can be a lifesaving resource for the person who knows how to use it properly.

A rope is a flexible cord of intertwined fibers. Most modern-day ropes are made of human-made materials, such as nylon, polyester, polypropylene, or a derivative of these. Natural fiber ropes have lost favor with most informed users because of their tendency to mold, mildew, degrade under ultraviolet light, and lose significant strength over time.

Rope for Life Safety

Being able to assess the characteristics of a rope in light of its intended use is a critical skill for the outdoorsperson and rescuer. Not every rope is appropriate for every purpose—a point that becomes increasingly important as one considers life-safety ropes versus the types of ropes used to rig camp.

Ropes used in non–life-safety applications are commonly known as commodity ropes. They can be found at hardware stores, discount stores, and in one’s garage. These ropes are fine for use in noncritical applications, where failure of the rope is unlikely or would have relatively minor consequences.

No rope should ever be used to support a human life unless it has been specifically built for that purpose. Stories abound of towropes being (fatally) used as climbing ropes, utility ropes coming apart when used as hand lines, and natural fiber ropes rotting away to nothing. One good way to be certain that a rope is designed for life-safety purposes is to check whether it is certified to any life-safety standards, such as those promulgated by the Union of International Alpine Associations, Cordage Institute, American Society for Testing and Materials, or National Fire Protection Association.

Various types of life-safety rope are made for specific purposes and applications. Rope priorities are different for rock climbers, mountaineers, cavers, and rescue personnel. The requirements of each of these categories of life-safety rope users tend to revolve around similar performance considerations, but different users want different combinations of these considerations. Important performance considerations for life-safety rope can be categorized as follows:

Life-safety rope users generally select which rope to use on the basis of whether they want a rope that stretches a little, a lot, or somewhere in between. Life-safety rope is generally classified into three types: dynamic, low stretch, and static. Each of these three types of rope is tested to different standards and criteria.

Although there are no cookie-cutter solutions to rope selection, some rough generalizations can be made. A climber who could potentially take a significant fall on a rope will opt for a higher stretch rope for its ability to absorb the forces of a fall—a dynamic rope. A rescuer who wants to lower a load without a lot of excess elongation may choose a rope with as little stretch as possible to more effectively manage the load—a static rope. The user who wants a limited amount of stretch but would like at least some force-absorption capability may opt for a low-stretch type of rope.

It is important to understand the job at hand as well as performance characteristics of ropes to select the right rope. With appropriate knowledge of the intended use of a rope, performance characteristics can be most accurately evaluated.

Every system should be built to withstand greater potential force than the actual force expected on the system. The difference between these two numbers is known as a “safety factor” and is expressed as a ratio. For example a system that is capable of withstanding up to 5000 lb at its weakest point, but is expected to only see 1000 lb in actual use, is said to have a 5:1 safety factor. That is, the actual strength of the system is five times greater than the intended load.

Safety factors are most appropriately applied to the completed system, not just the rope or other individual components. What constitutes an appropriate safety factor is really at the discretion of the user. Where there is a low likelihood and minimal consequence of failure, a safety factor as low as 2:1 may be appropriate whereas situations that involve a high probability or consequence of failure may call for a safety factor as high as 7:1 or greater.

Establishing and calculating an appropriate safety factor requires not only a fair amount of sophistication on the part of the user, but also a high starting strength to compensate for strength reductions as the equipment is integrated into a system. According to Cordage Institute specifications, static and low-stretch life-safety rope must meet the minimum strength requirement outlined in Table 95-1.

TABLE 95-1 Minimum Breaking Strength by Size (Diameter) Noted in Pounds-Force (lbf) and Kilonewtons (kN)

Diameter Minimum Breaking Strength
7 mm (0.28 inch) 2200 lbf (9.8 kN)
8 mm (0.31 inch) 2875 lbf (12.8 kN)
10 mm (0.38 inch) 4500 lbf (20.0 kN)
11 mm (0.44 inch) 6000 lbf (26.7 kN)
12.5 mm (0.5 inch) 9000 lbf (40.0 kN)
16 mm (0.63 inch) 12,500 lbf (55.6 kN)

Impact Force

Impact force is an important consideration, especially for sport climbers who are climbing above their protection, thereby exposing themselves to a fall with significant impact potential. Dynamic ropes are most commonly used for such applications. They are designed to absorb energy during a fall so that the force is not transmitted to the climber or to anchorages. Dynamic ropes are tested to verify their performance using an 80-kg (176-lb) mass, and are certified to either Union of International Alpine Associations or European Committee for Standardization standards. During these tests, the 80-kg (176-lb) mass is attached to a 2.5-m (8.2-foot) rope, anchored over an edge, then raised 2.3 m (7.5 foot) above the anchor. It is then dropped a total distance of 4.8 m (15.7 foot), with the requirement that the resulting impact force be less than 12 kN (2698 lbf). Despite a rope passing this laboratory test to qualify as dynamic, it should be noted that taking a 12-kN impact is not a pleasant experience for most people and may cause injury during a real-life fall. Typical industrial fall protection standards require fall protection equipment to limit impact forces to 8 kN or less, which is also based on an 80-kg (176-lb) mass. Climbers who weigh considerably more will generate greater forces and may require larger diameter dynamic ropes to provide proper safety and a reasonably low impact force.

When it comes to static and low-stretch ropes, impact force is an important consideration, but impact-force testing is not performed in the same way as on dynamic rope, because static and low-stretch ropes are not intended to be used when significant impact may occur.

Life-Safety Rope Construction

Most life-safety ropes in the 21st century are of kernmantle construction. The German word kernmantle means “core” (kern) and “sheath” (mantle). Kernmantle rope sheaths are braided around the core, and their design is crucial to the hand, knotability, and abrasion resistance of the rope. A tightly woven sheath is more durable than a loose weave, but this feature must be finely balanced to maintain knotability. Other variables include fiber denier, number of strands in the braid, and angle of weave.

Materials

Before the development of synthetic fiber ropes, the standard for many years was rope made of natural fibers (e.g., manila). Natural fiber rope degrades in strength even when carefully stored; it lacks the ability to absorb shock loads, lacks continuous fiber along the length of the rope, and has low strength compared with certain artificial fibers. For these reasons, natural fiber ropes are no longer considered appropriate for life-safety applications. Synthetic fibers—including polyolefin, aramids, UHMPE, polyester, and nylon—are more commonly used in modern-day rope making.

Rope Type

The core of a kernmantle rope primarily determines the elongation, force absorption, and strength properties of that rope. The terms dynamic, low stretch, and static, introduced earlier in this chapter, are technically misnomers in that all ropes are dynamic, at least to some degree. However, these are the industry-standard terms, and are quite useful for relating the degree of elongation inherent in each type of rope.

Static Kernmantle Rope

A static kernmantle rope is designed to be very strong and to have minimal stretch (i.e., as little as 3% to 6% at 10% minimum breaking strength). For consistent strength, inner bundles run continuously and unbroken throughout the length of the rope, usually in a near-parallel manner to reduce stretch and spin (Figure 95-2). This load-carrying core is protected from dirt, abrasion, and cutting by a tightly braided outer sheath. Static kernmantle ropes are ideal for lowering and raising heavy loads (e.g., during rescue), work positioning, and fall protection. Static ropes should not be subjected to a fall factor of more than 0.25 unless additional force-absorption provisions are made in the system.

Rope Selection Considerations

Selecting the right rope for the job means first and foremost understanding how a rope is affected by—and performs with—the way you use it. The following discussion provides some background for balancing these needs against available alternatives.

Rope Strength

Rope strength is a fairly misunderstood topic. Strength of life-safety rope is usually referred to as minimum breaking strength. Unfortunately, reported numbers do not necessarily reflect numbers adequate for comparison. Variations in test methods, as well as in analysis of results, provide little more than marketing fodder that can create great confusion.

One way to report strength is as the rope’s “ultimate” or “maximum” breaking strength, which is the highest score of a given rope in a series of tests. An alternative is to list the average breaking strength of several tests. A more conservative method is to define breaking strength at a value that is two or three standard deviations below the average test result. Another method is to define the minimum as not greater than 10% below the average. Often figures for tensile or breaking strength are reported without any explanation as to whether they are average or minimum or whether some other measure was used. Simply stated, the term breaking strength may refer to any one of these reporting methods or to another method altogether.

To add to the confusion, a number of factors affect test results. The rate at which the pull is applied to the rope, temperature, humidity, diameter of the object to which the rope is attached, and other factors all affect test results. Unless ropes are tested in exactly the same way, results cannot be meaningfully compared.

One common test method that has been adopted by several standards organizations is CI-1801 from the Cordage Institute. CI-1801 for life-safety rope is specific and gives a common baseline from which to attain results. This standard also calls for a very conservative reporting method, wherein minimum breaking strength is defined as three standard deviations below the mean of several break tests. This helps normalize results. In addition to type of construction, the strength of a rope comes from the amount of nylon used in its construction; similar rope constructions of the same diameter should have similar strengths if they have the same amount and quality of nylon.

Results from laboratory tests may differ greatly from rope performance in real-world applications, which cannot be consistently and accurately quantified. For example, a knotted rope loaded over a building edge may not come close in strength to a rope that is loaded in a laboratory tensile test machine.

Knots in Life-Safety Ropes

The medical professional encounters many knots during the course of his or her career. From the square knot in a stitched laceration to neckties at administrative functions, practical and symbolic representations of knots abound.

In modern society, knots are used as a form of expression, in art, as mathematical structures, and for security purposes. Determination of “good” versus “bad” in the analysis of a knot lies solely in the knot’s ability to achieve the purpose for which it was created. Therefore, you may find that several of the good and clever knots you have learned are useless when it comes to functioning in the wilderness.

How Knots Work

It has been said “if you cannot tie it right, at least tie it big”; this is how the “lotta knot” was born. In a lotta knot, the greater the mass of rope and the more twists and turns it takes in relation to itself, the higher the probability that the knot will hold. Although the theory is somewhat humorous, it is seldom effective.

Clearly, certain types of twists and bends hold better than others; the reason the lotta knot sometimes holds together is because the larger mass increases the odds of getting a bend to hold in the mix. However, there are many disadvantages to this type of knot. It takes up a lot of rope and is very difficult to tension. The varying twists and turns are not conducive to tightening the knot or positioning it properly, and it is usually quite difficult to untie. There is also the unpredictability factor; often the lotta knot fails to perform altogether.

The internal friction of a knot is essentially what holds it together. This friction can be attained by the rope taking twists and turns around itself or from friction against another object, such as a capstan or another rope.

The serious professional should take knot tying seriously because in a wilderness rescue situation, lives may depend on this skill. One should be able to select the correct knot without hesitation, tie knots correctly the first time, and be able to tie knots with gloved hands, on muddy or icy rope, in the dark, and under stress. Finally, one should be able to determine by looking at a knot whether it is tied correctly.

Categories of Knots

The most practical way to select a particular knot is to first evaluate what role that knot is expected to perform. For the purposes of this book, knots are addressed on the basis of five basic functions: 1) stopper knots; 2) end-of-line knots; 3) midline knots; 4) knots that join two ropes; and 5) safety knots.

There are subsets of knots for the terminology purist. A knot that is tied around something (e.g., a tree, a standing rope, the rail of a litter), that conforms to the shape of the object around which it is tied, and that does not keep its shape when the object around which it is tied is removed is called a hitch.

In its simplest form, a loop is a section of rope that crosses itself. A tied loop is a knot that forms a fixed eye or loop in the end of a rope. Regardless of the name or the way in which the terminology applies, there are basic rules that apply to any of these ties.

When working with rope, it is critical to be aware of the type of material into which the knot is tied. Some fibers have a low coefficient of friction and require special considerations when tying knots. Knots that are effective on rope do not always perform well in webbing or sling material.

End-of-Line Knots

Perhaps the most common use of a knot is to make a loop in the end of a rope to anchor, tie in, or attach the rope to something. Bowline knots have been borrowed from mariners, and have been used by mountaineers for years. However, this knot can “capsize” into a slipknot quite easily when the tail is pulled; therefore, the high-strength bowline knot (Figure 95-6) is often preferred for life-safety applications. Other variations on the bowline knot that include added safety for live loads are the simple bowline with safety (Figure 95-7) and the bowline with Yosemite safety (Figure 95-8).

A handy way to tie a mainline and backup line together for attachment to a live load like a litter with patient and attendant is the interlocking long-tail bowlines (Figure 95-9), which consist of two simple bowlines with small loops tied to interlock, while leaving long tails for additional attachment to the litter and attendant.

Another interesting bowline variation is the bowline on a coil (Figure 95-10). With its several large loops, the bowline on a coil can be used creatively. For example, this knot is sometimes used to attach a person to a belay line if a harness is not available or to create a load-distributing anchor.

Many people prefer to use forms of the figure-8 knot for multiple applications, perhaps because this way they have to learn only one knot. One advantage is that the figure-8 knot may be tied directly onto a bight (Figure 95-11), or it may be tied as a retrace (Figure 95-12). Although the versatile nature of the figure-8 knot is indeed attractive, it should be noted that learning only one knot may prove limiting. Some people feel that the figure-8 knot is easier to tie and check than other knots. In truth, the redundant nature of the figure-8 retrace can make it deceiving on visual inspection, and this factor has resulted in accidents.

Midline Knots

Knots are often used to form loops in the middle of a rope, for clipping into, for grasping, or for bypassing a piece of damaged rope. Perhaps the easiest and most common method of throwing such a loop is with a simple overhand on a bight (Figure 95-13). Alternatively, a figure-8 on a bight (see Figure 95-11) may be used for this purpose. Either of these options works well as long as the load is attached to the bight. However, both these loops are susceptible to deformation when not loaded. Perhaps more important, if the rope below the knot is loaded, the knot deforms and weakens.

More preferable by far is the butterfly knot (Figure 95-14), particularly if the loop and the line beneath it will be placed under significant load. The butterfly can be pulled effectively either from the loop or from below the knot without negative effect. Caution must be taken with this knot, because if the loop is not big enough and not loaded, it can pull out under tension.

For a quick and versatile solution to creating twin loops in the middle of a rope, a bowline can be tied on a bight of rope. The bowline on a bight (Figure 95-15) results in two relatively symmetric loops that can be used to make an emergency boatswains chair, hand loops, or towing bridle.

Another midline knot is the inline figure-8 knot (Figure 95-16). As the name implies, it is tied with its loop in line with the direction of pull on the rope. It is possible to make a nice foot-and-hand loop ladder out of a single piece of rope using this knot, but it should not be used if multidirectional loading of the loop and the rope’s ends is anticipated. The butterfly knot is much better suited for such multidirectional loading applications.

To quickly create two loops for multiple anchor points that need to be equalized to share a load, the double figure-8 (bunny ears) knot (Figure 95-17) can be tied midline or as an end line knot. The loops or “ears” can be elongated or shortened to equalize the load between the two anchor points.

Knots That Join Two Ropes

Tying a knot that will not untie itself is very important when joining two ropes, particularly because the knotted ends are unlikely to be in a place where they can be constantly monitored.

Most people, by about the age of 3 years, have learned to tie a square knot (Figure 95-18) for the purpose of joining rope ends. Although well known and easy to tie, this knot is far from being a secure or reliable tie. It can easily untie itself, either by pulling through when tightened or by shaking apart when loose. In short, the square knot should be avoided for all but decorative purposes.

The overhand bend (Figure 95-19) is proclaimed by many in the climbing community to be the preferred choice for joining two ropes. However, this knot may untie while in use and is not deemed secure enough for rescue purposes. Instead, the more secure double fisherman’s bend (Figure 95-20) should be used. This bend is very effective for joining ropes of relatively equal diameter. Care should be taken to ensure that the two halves of the bend nestle against each other and that there is enough tail protruding from the knot to keep the knot from unraveling. This knot is also used to join two ends of a short length of cordage for use as a Prusik hitch (see Hitches, later).

When ropes of unequal diameter are joined, the double-sheet bend (Figure 95-21) is a more effective tie. This is a bulkier alternative that is perhaps not quite as strong, but can be easier to untie and and is preferred for joining ropes of different diameters.

The versatile figure-8 knot deserves honorable mention here. Retracing a figure-8 knot in the opposing direction with a second rope results in what is commonly referred to as a figure-8 bend, an effective means of joining rope ends (Figure 95-22). Care must be taken with this method to ensure that the rope ends exit from opposite ends of the bend. If tied simply as a figure-8 knot, this bend has a tendency to deform and pull itself apart (Figure 95-23). Most knots work best in cordage or rope that has a rounded surface. Flat webbing and similar materials perform differently under tension. The preferred bend for joining webbing ends is known as the ring bend, sometimes also called the tape knot (Figure 95-24). This is most useful for forming webbing slings into a loop, but can also be used for lashing.

Hitches

Hitching is a method of tying a rope around itself or an object in such a way that the object is integral to the support of the hitch. Hitches are seldom used in rescue and should be considered for use only by a skilled technician, because there are severe consequences when a hitch comes untied or does not perform as intended. Specifically, disintegration of a hitch results in immediate release of whatever load it is holding.

One of the most commonly used hitches is the Prusik hitch (Figure 95-25). A Prusik hitch is a sliding hitch by which a cord can be attached to a rope and slid up and down the rope for positioning. However, under tension, the hitch will not slide. A Prusik hitch is created by tying a length of cordage into a loop by means of a double fisherman’s bend. Wrapping the loop around the main rope and through its own loop two or three times and then pulling it tight forms the hitch.

Another fairly common hitch used in climbing and rescue applications is the clove hitch (Figure 95-26). This hitch can be useful when trying to shorten the distance between two objects, such as the climber’s belay and the climber or the litter rail and the rescuer. It is also useful in some lashing techniques, but can have a tendency to roll loose.

Another type of hitch, called the Münter hitch or Italian hitch (Figure 95-27), can be used around a carabiner or pole to add friction to a system, as in a belay. This hitch is particularly useful in that it effectively adds friction regardless of which direction the rope is moving. However, care should be taken when using the hitch around a carabiner, because there can be a tendency for the moving rope to slip through the gate of the carabiner, rendering the hitch useless.

A very handy hitch known as a trucker’s hitch is useful for pulling cord or webbing tight across something (e.g., a load in the bed of a pickup truck [hence the name]) or securing a patient snugly into a litter (Figure 95-28).

The handcuff hitch (Figure 95-29), which is not in common use, is possibly useful for combative patients or pulling gently on the arms of someone stuck in a tight spot. Care must be taken to not pull hard enough to rip off hands or arms. A little force applied in the right direction may provide the key to moving a trapped caver or similarly stuck patient.

No discussion of knots would be complete without mention of the girth hitch (Figure 95-30), useful for a quick, although not too secure, attachment of a sling or rope to almost anything.

Lashing

The term lashing refers generally to the process of binding items together, such as poles for a shelter or drag. One basic technique used when starting or finishing a lashing involves the round turn with two half hitches (Figure 95-31). This is a more secure but bulkier solution for lashing than the aforementioned clove hitch. There are several variations on the concept of lashing, including square lashing (Figure 95-32) for arranging the poles to create a corner, diagonal lashing (Figure 95-33) for joining poles to create a triangular shape, and sheer lashing (Figure 95-34) for joining poles side by side. Lashings can be extremely useful tools for creating conveniences at camp as well as for emergency use in creating tripods and other mechanical aids.

Emergency Harness

The ability to quickly make an emergency harness out of rope or webbing is a key skill for anyone traveling into the wilderness, whether for climbing a damaged mast or belaying someone up an unexpected cliff. One of the simplest and easiest harnesses to tie is the hasty diaper harness (Figure 95-35). A simple loop of webbing is made by tying a ring bend (see Figure 95-24) in the ends of a length of webbing; alternatively, a loop of rope is made by tying a double fisherman’s bend in the ends of a length of rope. The loop goes on like a diaper and closes in the front with a carabiner.

Knots and Rope Strength

Knots inevitably reduce the strength of a rope. Knot strength is affected by the tightness of bends and the “pinching” effect that a knot has on itself.

The strength of a knot is directly proportional to the strength of the material into which it is tied. Knot strengths are usually expressed in terms of efficiency ratio. A knot rated at 85% efficiency is said to maintain about 85% of the reported breaking strength of the rope.

Some individuals and agencies have reported that any knot reduces the strength of a rope by at least 50%. This information is erroneous, because the efficiency of any knot depends on which knot is used, which rope it is tied into, whether it is tied correctly, and how it is maintained. Most knots recommended for use in wilderness rescue reduce the strength of a typical rescue rope to no less than 65% of that rope’s minimum breaking strength. Most commonly used knots are even more efficient and in the range of 80%.

Unfortunately, accurate data about knot efficiencies are hard to find. Comprehensive testing that takes into account statistically significant sampling, differences among rope fibers, constructions, and diameters, static versus dynamic loading, and other variables is virtually nonexistent.

The following data, taken from many different sources and reflecting limited testing, should be referenced for trend information only.

The relative breaking strength of kernmantle design ropes with knots follows:

The best way to know the strength of a knot on a given rope is to test the type of knot that is to be used on the type of rope that is to be used. One should test enough samples using statistical analysis to provide a reasonable margin of error.