Rigid Bronchoscopy with Laser and Stent Placement for Bronchus Intermedius Obstruction from Lung Cancer Involving the Right Main Pulmonary Artery

Published on 23/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 3355 times

Chapter 22 Rigid Bronchoscopy with Laser and Stent Placement for Bronchus Intermedius Obstruction from Lung Cancer Involving the Right Main Pulmonary Artery

image

This chapter emphasizes the following elements of the Four Box Approach: risk-benefit analyses and therapeutic alternatives; and anatomic dangers and other risks.

Case Description

A 50-year-old female with a 30–pack-year history of smoking developed wheezing and worsening shortness of breath, limiting her daily activities. Right lateral decubitus position worsened her symptoms, and she could not sleep on her right side. She was admitted to an outside hospital, where flexible bronchoscopy showed complete obstruction of the right upper lobe bronchus and severe obstruction (≈80%) of the bronchus intermedius (BI). She was transferred for bronchoscopic restoration of airway patency. The patient had a history of stage III squamous cell carcinoma of the lung diagnosed 18 months previously. Her pulmonary function test at that time showed a vital capacity of 2.94 L (80% predicted) and FEV1 of 2.39 L (85% predicted). She received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy followed by right lower lobectomy and mediastinal node dissection; all nodes were negative. The primary tumor measured 2.5 × 2 × 2 cm and extended to the parenchymal resection margins; evidence showed peritumoral lung consolidation related to the secondary effects of radiation therapy. Shortly after undergoing treatment, the patient lost her insurance coverage and was unable to pursue clinical or imaging surveillance. Comorbidities included rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requiring methotrexate and prednisone 20 mg/day and bipolar disorder treated with valproic acid. She was unemployed and divorced and lived with her children. Her physical examination was remarkable for expiratory wheezing noted in the right lung field. No limitation of cervical spine mobility was detected, but she had ulnar deviation of her hands and swan neck deformities of her fingers. She had significant functional impairment with a KPS score of 30 and was scored ECOG 3. Chest radiography showed a prominent hilar mass and right middle lobe atelectasis (Figure 22-1, A). Chest CT revealed a mass measuring 4 × 7 × 3 cm that invaded the BI and encased the right pulmonary artery (Figure 22-1, B). Repeat flexible bronchoscopy showed a near complete mixed pattern of obstruction (by exophytic tumor and extrinsic compression) of the BI, but right middle lobe bronchial segments were patent. The right upper lobe bronchus was occluded by extrinsic compression (Figure 22-1, C and D), but the flexible bronchoscope could be passed beyond the occluded airway, noting patent anterior and apical segmental bronchi (see video on ExpertConsult.com) (Video V.22.1image). Echocardiogram showed a systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 60 mm Hg and a moderately dilated right atrium but normal bilateral ventricular size and function.

Case Resolution

Initial Evaluations

Physical Examination, Complementary Tests, and Functional Status Assessment

This patient’s focal wheezing on auscultation of the right chest suggests airflow obstruction distal to the carina.1 Positional wheezing suggests a component of dynamic obstruction such as excessive dynamic airway collapse, malacia, or, as in our patient, positional worsening in an already narrowed airway. When localized to a bronchus, these processes will be worsened in the lateral decubitus position.

The hand-joint deformities seen in this patient are characteristic of advanced rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and may predict involvement of the axial skeleton,2 of which the cervical spine joints are the most clinically important, with a prevalence of involvement ranging from 15% to 86%.3 This patient had no symptoms of instability related to atlantoaxial (C1-C2) or subaxial (below C1-C2) subluxation. These include neck pain, stiffness, and radicular pain, all of which should be explored in cases of rigid bronchoscopy or endotracheal intubation. During these procedures, the cervical spine is hyperextended to align the mouth, larynx, and trachea. In one study, preoperative cervical spine assessment with cervical spine films in asymptomatic patients with RA before elective surgery revealed an incidence of unsuspected C1-C2 subluxation of 5.5%.4 Subluxations can vary over time, may be unrecognized, and can be fatal in up to 10% of patients because of spinal cord or brainstem compression.5 Because of the dangers of neck movements required for intubation, and because subluxation is not always symptomatic, radiographic evaluation of the cervical spine probably should be considered for all patients with RA scheduled to undergo procedures requiring cervical manipulation.6

The cricoarytenoid joint may be involved in 30% of patients with RA. Hoarseness and stridor in patients with RA suggest laryngeal involvement and are present in 75% of patients,7 but those with chronic cricoarytenoid arthritis may be relatively asymptomatic. Any disease process leading to hyperventilation, increased airflow (exertion, acidosis, infection), or reduction in the diameter of the airway (upper respiratory infection) can precipitate symptoms.8 In addition, patients with cricoarytenoid arthritis are at risk both during intubation and after extubation. Intubation may be difficult if the airway is narrow and, even if atraumatic and of short duration, can prompt mucosal edema and further compromise of airway caliber, leading to airway obstruction and stridor following extubation.9 Systemic glucocorticoids are often effective in reversing the obstruction caused by acute cricoarytenoid arthritis, and local periarticular steroid injections have been shown to improve cricoarytenoid function. In chronic cricoarytenoid arthritis, the degree of airflow limitation dictates the need for laser cordotomy or arytenoidectomy.10 Other potential manifestations of RA that could interfere with airway management include limited temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility (<4.5 cm), which is present in approximately 66% of patients with long-standing RA. Most of these patients experience pain and tenderness in the TMJ. Upper airway obstruction can occur because of pharyngeal obstruction, as in patients with micrognathia or obstructive sleep apnea. Furthermore, a small mouth opening from TMJ disease may preclude rigid bronchoscopic intubation. In our patient, upper airway anatomy was normal, and no signs of RA-related laryngeal involvement or TMJ disease were noted.

Comorbidities

This patient had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Although possibly attributable to higher unmeasured severity of illness in patients with psychiatric comorbidity, existing psychiatric disease has been found to be associated with a modestly increased risk of death among patients undergoing surgery.11 Our patient had been taking prednisone 20 mg/day for many years. The equivalent of 15 mg/day of prednisone for longer than 3 weeks should raise suspicion for hypothalamic-adrenal axis suppression,12 warranting increased glucocorticoid supplementation associated with possible adrenal insufficiency related to medical and surgical stress.12 In this regard, one must recall that supplemental corticosteroids can induce or exacerbate manic or depressive episodes, potentially interfering with postoperative care.13

Procedural Strategies

Expected Results

Relief of BI obstruction was expected to improve her lung function and potentially her dyspnea by restoring ventilation to the right middle lobe. A vast majority of patients with malignant central airway obstruction (CAO) improve their dyspnea and performance status if the CAO is palliated. The modality used to restore airway patency (i.e., laser, stent, photodynamic therapy [PDT], electrocautery, or brachytherapy) depends on tumor characteristics (i.e., extrinsic, endoluminal, or mixed) and severity and type of obstruction (i.e., critical, compromising respiratory status), operator preference, and availability of specific technologies.18 The modality used to restore airway patency might not make a difference in terms of outcome, suggesting that it is restoration of airway patency per se that counts, not the method used to achieve it.19 Survival may also be improved, especially if further systemic therapy can be initiated post procedure. Overall, the median survival of patients with untreated malignant CAO can be as low as 1 to 2 months.20 If interventional bronchoscopy is successful in relieving airway obstruction, survival is similar to that in patients without CAO.21 Stent insertion results in significant improvement in Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scales (MRC)-measured dyspnea and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, although in one study, a significant survival advantage was seen only in the intermediate performance group (ECOG ≤3, MRC ≤4) when compared with historic controls. Perhaps improved survival is noted if airway patency is restored before the development of complications such as post obstructive pneumonia, irreversible atelectasis, or loss of ventilatory function from malignant CAO.22

Therapeutic Alternatives

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for recurrent locally advanced NCSLC previously treated with radiation therapy is a feasible, noninvasive therapeutic alternative.23 However, when associated severe airway obstruction results in atelectasis, the response rate is 20% to 50% in studies involving more than 50 patients.24 Smaller studies showed that bronchial obstruction could be relieved in up to 74% of patients, resulting in complete or partial re-expansion of the collapsed lung. The time to initiation of treatment matters because 71% of patients irradiated within 2 weeks after radiologic evidence of atelectasis had complete re-expansion of their lungs, compared with only 23% of those irradiated after 2 weeks.25 In our patient, EBRT was potentially limited by evidence of radiation-induced toxicity from previous radiotherapy. Improvements in imaging and treatment planning using three-dimensional (3D) conformational radiation and respiratory gating can precisely target radiotherapy, and by decreasing the normal tissue margins included to account for uncertainties in position, can diminish the risk of clinically significant pneumonitis and esophagitis.26

Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) has proven efficacy in patients with endoluminal tumor and a substantial extrabronchial component. For palliation of NSCLC symptoms, EBB alone appears to be less effective than EBRT. For this patient previously treated with EBRT, who was symptomatic from recurrent endobronchial CAO, EBB is a reasonable alternative.27 Success rates vary between 53% and 95%,28 but the overall incidence of fatal hemoptysis is 10% (range, 0% to 42%). Irradiation in the vicinity of major vessels, in this case the right pulmonary artery, increases bleeding risk.29 In fact some authors suggest that patients with tumors involving the major vessels should be excluded from EBB.30 Squamous cell pathology and tumor located in the mainstem bronchus or upper lobe represent additional risk factors for hemoptysis.31 Patients with poor performance status may be at higher risk for periprocedural complications such as cough, bronchospasm, and pneumothorax caused by catheter placement.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) could be provided, but because of the severe nature of the airway obstruction, the sloughed tissue resulting from PDT could occlude the airway and cause complete obstruction, resulting in worsening symptoms and post obstructive pneumonia.32 This patient’s previous surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy did not represent contraindications to PDT, and in fact this therapy can be offered to patients who become unresponsive to chemotherapy or radiation therapy.33 PDT is most effective when obstruction from mucosal disease is greater than 50% and in patients with good performance status.34 Hemorrhage has been reported in 0 to 2.3% of patients, but the risk may be greater when the disease involves major blood vessels.

Cryotherapy would address only the endoluminal component of the obstructing airway lesion. It can be combined with EBRT to enhance its efficacy.35 The effect is delayed, and initially sloughed tissue resulting from vasoconstriction and necrosis might worsen airway obstruction. Cryotherapy is reportedly effective in up to 75% of patients with lung cancer with endoluminal obstruction,36 but it is not the therapy of choice when extrinsic compression is present.

Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and electrocautery allow removal of exophytic disease.18 Systemic, life-threatening APC-related gas embolism has been reported.37 Risks may be increased when highly vascularized lesions are treated and in proximity of large blood vessels. Depth of penetration and distribution of thermal-induced necrosis within tissues are not as predictable as they are with lasers because electrical current follows the path of least electrical resistance within different tissue types.

Metal stents are more costly than silicone stents, but procedures can be performed via flexible bronchoscopy with or without fluoroscopy.38 Therefore it is an appropriate alternative, especially in patients with significant comorbidities precluding general anesthesia.

Silicone Y stent insertion at the right primary carina (RC1) was shown to improve symptoms in a small published case series of three patients with malignant disease. The bronchial limbs of the stent saddled the involved carina between the bronchus to the right upper lobe and the bronchus intermedius.39 The very wide RC1 and the near complete obstruction in the RUL bronchus precluded this approach in our patient.

Comfort care without palliative bronchoscopic intervention is not an unreasonable approach to treating this patient with poor quality of life and a grim prognosis. A palliative care consultation and potential initiation of hospice care, especially if quality of life continues to deteriorate, should be considered, regardless of other therapeutic alternatives.

Cost-Effectiveness

To our knowledge, no formal cost-effectiveness evaluations of these various modalities have yet been published, but investigators report potential cost savings by implementing an airway program and timely (at diagnosis) bronchoscopic palliation of malignant CAO.22 Long hospitalizations and sojourns on mechanical ventilation are often avoided by rapidly initiating bronchoscopic palliation of airway obstruction or, in case palliative treatments are not selected, by referring patients for best supportive care and hospice.

Techniques and Results

Anesthesia and Perioperative Care

In patients with RA, rigid bronchoscopic intubation can be difficult and may result in loss of the airway. If the patient with RA is known to have upper airway obstruction, immediate tracheostomy may be necessary. Depending on physician biases, credentialing, and competencies, surgical standby may be warranted. Intubation should be as gentle as possible to avoid even minimal trauma because of the risk for mucosal edema and post extubation respiratory insufficiency. In cases of post extubation airway difficulties, the work of breathing can be reduced and airflow improved with the use of 80 : 20 helium/oxygen mixtures. Racemic epinephrine (2.25% solution) can be delivered via nebulization for stridor; the onset of action is 1 to 5 minutes, so if no improvement is noted, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation or, if necessary, awake, flexible bronchoscopic intubation can be considered in those already moved to the recovery area.

Because cervical entrapment is common even without signs or symptoms, the anesthesiologist and the bronchoscopist should assume that patients with RA are at increased risk for neurologic injury from cervical manipulation. Precautionary measures include assessing for possible cervical spine involvement by dynamic (flexion-extension) MRI, avoiding hyperextension, and maintaining the cervical spine in midline without extension before, during, and after the procedure. One might resort to awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation or reintubation rather than rigid laryngoscopic intubation.

This patient was at risk for hemodynamic instability during general anesthesia because of right pulmonary artery compression from tumor and pulmonary hypertension documented on echocardiogram. In fact, pulmonary artery compression by lung cancer, lymphoma, and benign tumors is well recognized and can have serious implications during interventions because any reduction in preload may significantly reduce cardiac output.

When lasers are used via rigid bronchoscopy, airway fires are rare if all flammable objects (e.g., suction catheter, stent) are removed from the laser path, the laser fiber tip is kept clean, the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is kept at less than 0.4, and laser pulses are of short duration (0.5 to 1 second) and are delivered at 40 W or less. Of course, in a patient with poor lung reserve (previous lobectomy), hypoxemia could occur from the use of low FiO2 and from bleeding and debris occluding the airway. Both hypoxemia and hypoventilation could exacerbate pulmonary hypertension, resulting in right heart failure and hypotension.

Anatomic Dangers and Other Risks

The proximal BI is surrounded by the right inferior pulmonary artery at the lateral wall and the right inferior pulmonary vein at the medial wall. In this patient, however, anatomy was distorted by her previous lobectomy, and the right main pulmonary artery was adjacent to the anterolateral wall of BI (see Figure 22-1). Displacement of anatomic structures must be expected in planning and performing bronchoscopic intervention, especially when lasers are being used. Deep Nd:YAG laser photocoagulation of tumor in the proximal BI is dangerous, given the proximity of the pulmonary artery already involved with tumor. Overly aggressive coring out, or inadvertent deep photocoagulation with resultant necrosis, could lead to perforation, uncontrollable hemorrhage, and death, even many days after the procedure.

Results and Procedure-Related Complications

The patient was intubated initially with an 11 mm Efer-Dumon rigid ventilating bronchoscope. The tumor was seen obstructing the BI and the RUL bronchus (see Figure 22-1). The flexible bronchoscope was advanced through the rigid scope, and inspection of the distal airways was attempted. Because the RML segments were patent (see video on ExpertConsult.com) (Video V.22.1image), we decided that stent insertion in the BI was warranted. The RUL bronchial tumor, characterized by extrinsic compression, was not addressed because of concern for airway perforation and major bleeding in view of pulmonary artery involvement. The Nd:YAG laser was used at 30 W power and 1 second pulses for a total of 100 Joules, and high-power density was used to vaporize the exophytic component of the tumor before the rigid bronchoscope was advanced in the distal BI. Using the bevel edge of the bronchoscope, a small amount of necrotic tumor was cored out from the BI, thereby restoring airway patency. The bronchoscope was removed, and the patient was reintubated using a 12 mm Efer-Dumon rigid ventilating bronchoscope. With the rigid scope in the distal BI, a 12 × 30 mm studded silicone stent was deployed (Figure 22-2). Saline washes performed through the flexible bronchoscope confirmed the absence of pus or excess necrotic material within the BI and the RML bronchus. The case lasted 60 minutes with no bleeding or hemodynamic instability. Extubation was well tolerated, and the patient was kept in the intensive care unit (ICU) for 24 hours, during which no complications were noted. She returned to the referring facility shortly thereafter.

LongTerm Management

Discussion Points

1. Enumerate four anesthesia considerations during rigid bronchoscopic laser resection in this patient in light of severe bronchial obstruction and pulmonary artery involvement.

2. Enumerate three different types of stents that could be inserted in this patient with incomplete obstruction of the bronchus intermedius and RUL bronchus.

3. Explain differences in tissue penetration and coagulation effects of Nd:YAG, CO2, and KTP lasers, and describe pertinent clinical implications for treating obstructive airway lesions.

Laser selection requires an understanding of the reflective, absorptive, scattering, and transmissive properties of the target tissue (Figure 22-3).*

Clinical implications (Table 22-2): Physicians who use lasers should acquire the ability to differentiate laser-induced tissue changes (Figure 22-4) visually, so that the heating process and its consequences can be stopped at the desired point. If the wavelength does not penetrate sufficiently (too heavily absorbed), it will not reach the vessels to control the bleeding, and it will not be able to destroy a sufficient volume of tumor by photocoagulation; in contrast, if a laser penetrates too deeply, it will create too much damage, resulting in delayed healing, edema, and possibly perforation of a vessel or an airway wall.

4. Describe the principle of power density and its effect on tissues when the Nd:YAG laser is used.

Clinical use of power density: (1) For cutting, a small spot (area) is desirable at high power density (see video on ExpertConsult.com) (Video V.22.2image). (2) For coagulation and gentle ablation, a large spot at low power density is used (see video on ExpertConsult.com) (Video V.22.3image); the wider the spot, the less the energy density. Spot size can be controlled by changing the distance of the distal tip of the delivery system from the target. Parameters that determine the total energy density are controlled by the operator and include the setting in watts, the length of time the beam is fired, and the spot size on the tissue. At low power density, the fiber usually is placed 1 cm away from the lesion for coagulation. At high power density, the fiber is placed close to the lesion (≈0.3 cm) for vaporization (see video on ExpertConsult.com) (Video V.22.4image). Coagulation usually is obtained at 8 to 20 W/cm2 without vaporization; power density in excess of this value will cause the temperature to rise to 100° C, and boiling of tissue water will occur. The high power density that cannot be removed by thermal conduction will cause rapid vaporization of tissues.

Expert Commentary

This patient had undergone chemo-radiotherapy followed by a right lower lobectomy 18 months previously. The pathology specimen revealed an R1 resection with tumor extending to the parenchymal resection margins, but no nodal metastases were found. The preoperative dose of radiation was not specified, but most published studies have used a dose of 45 Gy in this setting, not the full curative doses ranging from 66 to 74 Gy as reported in recent literature. An R1 resection increases the risk for local recurrence; this was the first site of treatment failure because this patient had no nodal metastases. However, the benefit of administering additional focal irradiation during the immediate postoperative period is unclear because of the difficulty involved in identifying a radiation target volume in the lung parenchyma on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, increased risks of radiation toxicity, which in turn depend on prior radiation dose, and the reduced radiobiologic effect caused by the “gap” in radiation delivery from the time of surgery and postoperative recovery.

The patient now presents with a symptomatic local recurrence measuring 4 × 7 × 3 cm, invading the bronchus intermedius and encasing the right pulmonary artery. In addition to exophytic tumor seen in the BI, a major component of extrinsic compression of the BI and the right upper lobe bronchus was observed. The patient expresses a strong wish to undergo treatment to improve her shortness of breath, which has caused significant emotional and physical distress.

I agree with using an approach that provides endobronchial therapy because this can achieve faster palliation than is possible, for example, with the use of external beam radiotherapy in this particular case. However, failure to address extrabronchial tumor may not lead to durable palliation and may not offer the possibility of cure. Progression of extrabronchial disease can rapidly lead to complete atelectasis and/or decreased perfusion to the right lung. Therefore after initial endobronchial treatment has been completed, and some palliation has been achieved, I would recommend a staging positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scan and an MRI scan of the brain to exclude occult metastatic disease, before external beam irradiation is considered.

External bean irradiation is a curative treatment option in patients who develop loco-regional recurrence after surgical resection.46 If disease extent is limited to the right hilum, external beam irradiation planned using a four-dimensional CT scan and delivered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy will allow for high-dose repeat irradiation, while limiting doses to the spinal cord, esophagus, and lung parenchyma.47 The risks of radiation-induced toxicity, including risks for pulmonary hemorrhage and late bronchial stenosis, will depend in part on the prior radiation dose received. If a dose of 45 Gy was administered, additional high-dose radiotherapy may be given, considering that a dose of 74 Gy is currently being evaluated in the experimental arm of the RTOG 0617 phase III trial in North America.48 Older literature has reported on outcomes after high-dose re-irradiation for recurrences after previous radiotherapy; long-term disease control with acceptable acute and late toxicity has been described.23,49,50 The risk-benefit ratio of delivering a dose of up to 60 Gy is expected to be better with the use of currently available techniques.

Because this patient has a centrally located tumor invading mediastinal structures (i.e., a possible T4 lesion), chemotherapy should be considered if a choice for curative options has not been excluded. This will depend on the patient’s performance score following endobronchial palliation and on an assessment of her motivation and ability to tolerate the more toxic chemo-radiotherapy approach. Platinum-based chemo-radiation generally should be considered in this setting only for patients with an ECOG performance score of 0 to 1. If the previous dose of radiation administered was 50 Gy or more, then sequential administration of chemotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy to 60 Gy may represent a less toxic approach.

Finally, one must be cognizant of the purely palliative nature of endobronchial brachytherapy in patients who present with bulky extra-bronchial disease. The rapid fall-off in radiation doses to peribronchial regions implies that the entire tumor volume will not receive a curative radiation dose. Attempting to encompass the patient’s peribronchial disease by means of brachytherapy would result in administration of prohibitively high doses to the bronchial wall, creating high risk for radiation-induced necrosis and perforation. For this reason, the combination of endobronchial debulking with or without stent insertion, followed by external beam radiotherapy, has become a widespread therapeutic palliative approach in recent years.

In summary, I believe that it is important that curative nonsurgical salvage treatments be considered in patients who present with a loco-regional recurrence, and to inform patients that re-irradiation is feasible with the use of newer delivery techniques and dose-response strategies, even after prior thoracic radiotherapy. Therefore a multidisciplinary approach to lung cancer management, even in cases where initial bronchoscopic palliation of airway obstruction is planned, can benefit patients and may result in better outcomes.

References

1. Hollingsworth HM. Wheezing and stridor. Clin Chest Med. 1987;8:231-240.

2. Winfield J, Young A, Williams P, et al. Prospective study of the radiological changes in hands, feet, and cervical spine in adult rheumatoid disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983;42:613-618.

3. Bland JH. Rheumatoid subluxation of the cervical spine. J Rheumatol. 1990;17:134-137.

4. Campbell RS, Wou P, Watt I. A continuing role for pre-operative cervical spine radiography in rheumatoid arthritis? Clin Radiol. 1995;50:157-159.

5. Mikulowski P. Sudden death in rheumatoid arthritis with atlanto-axial dislocation. Acta Med Scand. 1975;198:445-451.

6. Neva MH, Hakkinen A, Makinen H, et al. High prevalence of asymptomatic cervical spine subluxation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis waiting for orthopaedic surgery. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:884-888.

7. Geterud A, Bake B, Berthelsen B, et al. Laryngeal involvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Otolaryngol. 1991;111:990-998.

8. Geterud A, Ejnell H, Mansson I, et al. Severe airway obstruction caused by laryngeal rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1986;13:948-951.

9. Wattenmaker I, Concepcion M, Hibberd P, et al. Upper-airway obstruction and perioperative management of the airway in patients managed with posterior operations on the cervical spine for rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:360-365.

10. Bandi V, Munnur U, Braman SS. Airway problems in patients with rheumatologic disorders. Crit Care Clin. 2002;18:749-765.

11. Abrams TE, Vaughan-Sarrazin M, Rosenthal GE. Influence of psychiatric comorbidity on surgical mortality. Arch Surg. 2010;145:947-953.

12. Jung C, Inder JW. Management of adrenal insufficiency during the stress of medical illness and surgery. Med J Aust. 2008;188:409-413.

13. Naber D, Sand P, Heigl B. Psychopathological and neuropsychological effects of 8-days’ corticosteroid treatment: a prospective study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1996;21:25-31.

14. Howard LM, Barley EA, Davies E, et al. Cancer diagnosis in people with severe mental illness: practical and ethical issues. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:797-804.

15. Siddiqui F, Bae K, Langer CJ, et al. The influence of gender, race, and marital status on survival in lung cancer patients: analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:631-639.

16. Berglund A, Holmberg L, Tishelman C, et al. Social inequalities in non-small cell lung cancer management and survival: a population-based study in central Sweden. Thorax. 2010;65:327-333.

17. Tishelman C, Petersson LM, Degner LF, et al. Symptom prevalence, intensity, and distress in patients with inoperable lung cancer in relation to time of death. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5381-5389.

18. Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Becker HD, et al. Central airway obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:1278-1297.

19. Santos RS, Raftopoulos Y, Keenan RJ, et al. Bronchoscopic palliation of primary lung cancer: single or multimodality therapy? Surg Endosc. 2004;18:931-936.

20. Macha HN, Becker KO, Kemmer HP. Pattern of failure and survival in endobronchial laser resection: a matched pair study. Chest. 1994;105:1668-1672.

21. Chhajed PN, Baty F, Pless M, et al. Outcome of treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer with and without central airway obstruction. Chest. 2006;130:1803-1807.

22. Razi SS, Lebovics RS, Schwartz G, et al. Timely airway stenting improves survival in patients with malignant central airway obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1088-1093.

23. Okamoto Y, Murakami M, Yoden E, et al. Reirradiation for locally recurrent lung cancer previously treated with radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:390-396.

24. Slawson RG, Scott RM. Radiation therapy in bronchogenic carcinoma. Radiology. 1979;132:175-176.

25. Reddy SP, Marks JE. Total atelectasis of the lung secondary to malignant airway obstruction: response to radiation therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 1990;13:394-400.

26. Decker RH, Wilson LD. Advances in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29:285-290.

27. Cardona AF, Reveiz L, Ospina EG, et al. Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2, 2008. CD004284

28. Scarda A, Confalonieri M, Baghiris C, et al. Out-patient high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy for palliation of lung cancer: an observational study. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2007;67:128-134.

29. Hara R, Itami J, Aruga T, et al. Risk factors for massive hemoptysis after endobronchial brachytherapy in patients with tracheobronchial malignancies. Cancer. 2001;92:2623-2627.

30. Khanavkar B, Stern P, Alberti W, Nakhosteen JA. Complications associated with brachytherapy alone or with laser in lung cancer. Chest. 1991;99:1062-1065.

31. Macha HN, Wahlers B, Reichle C, et al. Endobronchial radiation therapy for obstructing malignancies: ten years’ experience with iridium-192 high-dose radiation brachytherapy afterloading technique in 365 patients. Lung. 1995;173:271-280.

32. Moghissi K, Dixon K. Is bronchoscopic photodynamic therapy a therapeutic option in lung cancer? Eur Respir J. 2003;22:535-541.

33. Moghissi K, Dixon K, Stringer M, et al. The place of bronchoscopic photodynamic therapy in advanced unresectable lung cancer: experience of 100 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:1-6.

34. Edell ES, Cortese DA. Photodynamic therapy: its use in the management of bronchogenic carcinoma. Clin Chest Med. 1995;16:455-463.

35. Vergnon JM, Schmitt T, Alamartine E, et al. Initial combined cryotherapy and irradiation for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results. Chest. 1992;102:1436-1440.

36. Vergnon JM, Huber RM, Moghissi K. Place of cryotherapy, brachytherapy and photodynamic therapy in therapeutic bronchoscopy of lung cancers. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:200-218.

37. Reddy C, Majid A, Michaud G, et al. Gas embolism following bronchoscopic argon plasma coagulation: a case series. Chest. 2008;134:1066-1069.

38. Alazemi S, Lunn W, Majid A, et al. Outcomes, health-care resources use, and costs of endoscopic removal of metallic airway stents. Chest. 2010;138:350-356.

39. Oki M, Saka H, Kitagawa C, et al. Silicone Y-stent placement on the carina between bronchus to the right upper lobe and bronchus intermedius. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:971-974.

40. Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:719-727.

41. Ramser ER, Beamis JrJF. Laser bronchoscopy. Clin Chest Med. 1995;16:415-426.

42. Colt HG. Laser bronchoscopy. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1996;2:277.

43. Vanderschueren RG, Westermann CJ. Complications of endobronchial neodymium-YAG (Nd:YAG) laser application. Lung. 1990;168:1089.

44. Mackie AM, Watson CB. Anaesthesia and mediastinal masses: a case report and review of the literature. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:899-903.

45. Fisher JC. The power density of a surgical laser beam: its meaning and measurement. Lasers Surg Med. 1983;2:301-315.

46. Jeremic B, Shibamoto Y, Milicic B, et al. External beam radiation therapy alone for loco-regional recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer after complete resection. Lung Cancer. 1999;23:135-142.

47. Haasbeek CJ, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Radiotherapy for lung cancer: clinical impact of recent technical advances. Lung Cancer. 2009;64:1-8.

48. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. RTOG clinical trials listed by study number. www.rtog.org/ClinicalTrials/ProtocolTable.aspx. Accessed February 12, 2012

49. Wu KL, Jiang GL, Qian H, et al. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for locoregionally recurrent lung carcinoma after external beam irradiation: a prospective phase I-II clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:1345-1350.

50. Tada T, Fukuda H, Matsui K, et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer: reirradiation for loco-regional relapse previously treated with radiation therapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2005;10:247-250.