
2. Calcifications on Chest X-Ray








3. Cardiac Enlargement
Cardiac Chamber Enlargement















FIGURE 11-1 Normal anatomy on the female chest radiograph in the upright posteroanterior projection (A) and in the lateral projection (B). (From Mettler FA: Primary Care Radiology. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2000.)
Left Atrium



Right Ventricle










Right Atrium
Multichamber Enlargement



Pericardial Disease



Pseudocardiomegaly




4. Cavitary Lesion on Chest X-Ray
Necrotizing Infections





Cavitary Infarction


Septic Embolism



Vasculitis


Neoplasms



Miscellaneous Lesions




5. Mediastinal Masses or Widening on Chest X-Ray


















B. Use and Interpretation of Pulmonary Function Tests




FIGURE 11-2 Basic spirometry. Long volumes obtained with a bell spirometer. (From Kiss GT: Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Disease in Primary Practice. Menlo Park, Calif, Addison-Wesley, 1982.)
TABLE 11-1
Pulmonary Function Test Patterns in Common Lung Diseases
Disorder | Parameter | Bronchodilator Response | |||||
FVC | FEV1 | FEV1/FVC | RV | TLC | Diffusion (DLCO) | ||
Asthma | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | Nl, ↑ | Nl, ↑ | Nl | + |
Chronic obstructive bronchitis | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | Nl, ↑ | Nl, ↑ | Nl | − |
Chronic obstructive bronchitis w/ bronchospasm | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | Nl, ↑ | Nl, ↑ | Nl | + |
Emphysema | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | Nl, ↑ | Nl, ↑ | Nl, ↓ | − |
Interstitial fibrosis | ↓ | Nl, ↓ | Nl, ↑ | Nl, ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | − |
Obesity, kyphosis | ↓ | Nl, ↓ | Nl, ↑ | Nl, ↑ | ↓ | Nl | − |
↑, greater than predicted; ↓, less than predicted.

FIGURE 11-3 Flow-volume curves of restrictive disease and various types of obstructive diseases compared with normal curves.
C. Pulmonary Formulas



D. Mechanical Ventilation
Indications (Please see section “M” for Respiratory Failure Classification)

ICU Sedation
Common Modes of Mechanical Ventilation
TABLE 11-2
Modes of Positive-Pressure Ventilation
Mode | Description | Advantages and Disadvantages |
Controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) | Ventilator f, inspiratory time, and VT (and thus ![]() |
Can be used in patients w/sedation or paralysis; ventilator cannot respond to ventilatory needs |
Assisted mechanical ventilation (AMV) or assist-control ventilation (ACV) | Ventilator VT and inspiratory time preset, but patient can f (and thus ![]() |
Ventilator may respond to ventilatory needs; ventilator may undertrigger or overtrigger, depending on sensitivity |
Intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) | Ventilator delivers preset VT, f, and inspiratory time, but patient also can breathe spontaneously | May ↓ asynchronous breathing and sedation requirements; ventilator cannot respond to ventilatory needs |
Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) | Same as IMV, but ventilator breaths delivered only after patient finishes inspiration | Same as IMV, and patient not overinflated by receiving spontaneous and ventilator breaths at same time |
High-frequency ventilation (HFV) | Ventilator f is and VT may be smaller than VD | May reduce peak airway pressure; may cause auto-PEEP |
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) | Patient breathes at own f; VT determined by inspiratory pressure and CRS | ↑ comfort and ↓ work of breathing; ventilator cannot respond to ventilatory needs |
Pressure control ventilation (PCV) | Ventilator peak pressure, f, and respiratory time preset | Peak inspiratory pressures may be ↓; hypoventilation may occur |
Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) | Inspiratory time exceeds expiratory time to facilitate inspiration | May improve gas exchange by ↑ time spent on inspiration; may cause auto-PEEP |
Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) | Patient receives CPAP at high and low levels to simulate VT | May improve oxygenation at lower airway pressure; hypoventilation may occur |
Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) | Patient determines own f, VT, pressures, and flows | May amplify spontaneous breathing; depends entirely on patient’s respiratory drive |
CRS, Respiratory system compliance; f, respiratory rate; VD, dead space.
Modified from Goldman L, Schafer AI (eds): Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 22nd ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2004.
Selection of Ventilator Settings
TABLE 11-3
Effects of Ventilator Setting Changes
Typical Effects on Blood Gases | ||
Ventilator Setting Changes | PaCO2 | PaO2 |
↑ PIP | ↓ | ↑ |
↑ PEEP | ↑ | ↑ |
↑ Rate (IMV) | ↓ | Minimal ↑ |
↑ I/E ratio | No change | ↑ |
↑ FIO2 | No change | ↑ |
↑ Flow | Minimal ↓ | Minimal ↑ |
↑ Power (in HFOV) | ↓ | No change |
↑ ![]() |
Minimal ↓ | ↑ |
HFOV, High-frequency oscillatory ventilation; I/E, inspiratory/expiratory ratio; , mean airway pressure; PIP, peak inspiratory pressure.
From Tschudy MM, Arcara KM: The Harriet Lane Handbook, 19th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby, 2012.
TABLE 11-4
Common Ventilator Machine Settings for Various Disorders
Condition | Mode | Vt, ![]() |
PEEP (cm H2O) | Pressure Targets | FIO2 |
Depressed CNS drive | Mandatory ACV, SIMV | Vt = 10 mL/kg![]() |
0-5 | Peak usually <35 cm H2O | Minimum for Sao2 >90% |
Neuromuscular insufficiency | Acute: mandatory ACV, SIMV | Vt = 8-10 mL/kg![]() |
0-5 | Peak usually <35 cm H2O | As above |
Mild, recovering: SIMV and PSV, PSV alone | Guarantee VT >350 mL w/PSV breaths | 0-5 | |||
COPD | Early: ACV, SIMV Late: see text |
Vt = 8 mL/kg![]() Peak flow ≥60 L/min |
0∗ | Plateau <30 cm H2O; monitor for intrinsic PEEP (auto-PEEP) | As above |
∗ PEEP added to obstructive disease only in special circumstances.
From Noble J (ed): Textbook of Primary Care Medicine, 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 1996.

Major Complications
Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilatory Support
Common Criteria for Ventilator Weaning



FIGURE 11-4 Algorithm for assessing whether a patient is ready to be liberated from mechanical ventilation and extubated. P/F, PaO2/FIO2 ratio; WOB, work of breathing. (From Goldman L, Schafer AI [eds]: Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012.)
Methods of Weaning
Failure to Wean from Mechanical Ventilator
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
E. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Etiology












Diagnosis
Labs


Imaging

Treatment




F. Asthma
Definition

FIGURE 11-5 Ventilatory strategy for patients with ARDS. Several caveats should be considered when using the low VT strategy: (1) VT is based on predicted body weight (PBW), not actual body weight; PBW tends to be about 20% lower than actual BW; (2) the protocol mandates decreases in the VT lower than 6 mL/kg of PBW if the plateau pressure (Pplat) is greater than 30 cm H2O and allows for small increases in VT if the patient is severely distressed and/or if there is breath stacking, as long as Pplat remains at 30 cm H2O or lower; (3) because arterial CO2 levels will rise, pH will fall; acidosis is treated with increasingly aggressive strategies dependent on the arterial pH; (4) the protocol has no specific provisions for the patient with a stiff chest wall, which in this context refers to the rib cage and abdomen; in such patients, it seems reasonable to allow Pplat to increase to more than 30 cm H2O, even though it is not mandated by the protocol; in such cases, the limit on Pplat may be modified based on analysis of abdominal pressure, which can be estimated by measuring bladder pressure. (From Goldman L, Schafer AI [eds]: Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012.)
Diagnosis

TABLE 11-5
Relative Severity of an Asthmatic Attack as Indicated by Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, FEV1, and Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate
Test | Predicted Value (%) | Severity of Asthma |
PEFR | >80 | |
FEV1 | >80 | No spirometric abnormalities |
MMEFR | >80 | |
PEFR | >80 | |
FEV1 | >70 | Mild asthma |
MMEFR | 55-75 | |
PEFR | >60 | |
FEV1 | 45-70 | Moderate asthma |
MMEFR | 30-50 | |
PEFR | <50 | |
FEV1 | <50 | Severe asthma |
MMEFR | 10-30 |
From Goldman L, Schafer AI (eds): Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012. In Ferri F: Ferri’s Clinical Advisor: 5 Books in 1. 2013 edition. Philadelphia, Mosby, 2012.








Labs


Imaging


Treatment


TABLE 11-6
Classifying Asthma Severity and Initiating Treatment in Youths ≥12 Yr and Adults∗
Components of Severity | Classification of Asthma Severity (≥12 yr) | ||||
Intermittent | Persistent | ||||
Mild | Moderate | Severe | |||
Impairment Normal FEV1/FVC: 8-19 yr, 85%; 20-39 yr, 80%; 40-59 yr, 75%; 60-80 yr, 70% |
Symptoms | ≤2 days/wk | >2 days/wk but not daily | Daily | Throughout the day |
Night time awakenings | ≤2×/mo | 3-4×/mo | >1×/wk but not nightly | Often 7×/wk | |
Short-acting β2-agonist use for symptom control (not prevention of EIB) | ≤2 days/wk | >2 days/wk but not daily, and not more than 1× on any day | Daily | Several times per day | |
Interference with normal activity | None | Minor limitation | Some limitation | Extremely limited | |
Lung function | Normal FEV1 between exacerbations | ||||
FEV1 >80% predicted | FEV1 >80% predicted | FEV1 >60% but <80% predicted | FEV1 <60% predicted | ||
FEV1/FVC normal | FEV1/FVC normal | FEV1/FVC reduced 5% | FEV1/FVC reduced >5% | ||
Risk | Exacerbations requiring oral systemic corticosteroids | 0-1/yr | ≥2/yr → | ||
← Consider severity and interval since last exacerbation. Frequency and severity may fluctuate → over time for patients in any severity category. Relative annual risk of exacerbations may be related to FEV1. |
|||||
Recommended Step for Initiating Therapy | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 or 5 | |
Also, consider short course of oral systemic corticosteroids. | |||||
In 2-6 wk, evaluate level of asthma control that is achieved and adjust therapy accordingly. |
The stepwise approach is meant to assist, not replace, the clinical decision making required to meet individual patient needs.
Level of severity is determined by assessment of both impairment and risk. Assess impairment domain by patient’s/caregiver’s recall of previous 2-4 wk and spirometry. Assign severity to the most severe category in which any feature occurs.
At present, data are inadequate to correlate frequencies of exacerbation with different levels of asthma severity. In general, more frequent and intense exacerbations (e.g., requiring urgent, unscheduled care, hospitalization, or ICU admission) indicate greater underlying disease severity. For treatment purposes, patients who had ≥2 exacerbations requiring oral systemic corticosteroids in the past year may be considered the same as patients who have persistent asthma, even in the absence of impairment levels consistent with persistent asthma.
To access the complete Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma, go to www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
EIB, Exercise-induced bronchospasm
∗ Assessing severity and initiating treatment for patients who are not currently taking long-term control medications.
From National Asthma Education and Prevention Program: Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH publication 08-4051. Bethesda, Md, National Institutes of Health, 2007.
G. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Definition

FIGURE 11-7 Stepwise approach for managing asthma in youth ≥12 yr old and in adults. EIB, Exercise-induced bronchospasm; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, inhaled long-acting β2-agonist; LTRA, leukotriene receptor antagonist; SABA, inhaled short-acting β2-agonist. (From National Asthma Education and Prevention Program: Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH publication 08-4051. Bethesda, Md, National Institutes of Health, 2007.)
TABLE 11-7
Differentiating Features of COPD and Asthma
COPD | Asthma | |
Smoker or ex-smoker | Most | Possibly |
Symptoms <35 yr of age | Rare | Common |
Atopic features (rhinitis, eczema) | Uncommon | Common |
Cellular infiltrate | Macrophages, neutrophils, CD8+ T cells | Eosinophils, CD4+ T cells |
Cough and sputum | Daily/common | Intermittent |
Breathlessness | Persistent and progressive | Variable |
Night time symptoms | Uncommon | Common |
Significant diurnal or day-to-day variability of symptoms | Uncommon | Common |
Bronchodilator response (FEV1 and PEFR) | <15% | >20% |
Corticosteroid response | Poor | Good |
From Ballinger A: Kumar & Clark’s Essentials of Clinical Medicine, 5th ed. Edinburgh, Saunders, 2012.
TABLE 11-8
Classification of COPD Severity (GOLD Criteria)
Stage | Function | Symptoms |
Stage I: mild | FEV1/FVC <70% FEV1 ≥80% predicted |
Chronic cough, none/mild breathlessness |
Stage II: moderate | FEV1/FVC <70% 50% ≤ FEV1 <80% predicted |
Breathlessness on exertion |
Stage III: severe | FEV1/FVC <70% 30% ≤ FEV1 <50% predicted |
Breathless on minimal exertion; possible weight loss and depression |
Stage IV: very severe | FEV1/FVC <70% FEV1 <30% predicted or FEV1 <50% predicted plus respiratory failure |
Breathless at rest |
Modified from Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. Available at: www.goldcopd.com
Etiology




Diagnosis
H&P



Classification
Imaging



Treatment
H. Pulmonary Vascular Disease
1. Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Definition
Etiology

TABLE 11-9
Guideline Recommendations for Hospital Management of COPD Exacerbations
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease∗ | American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society† | National Institute for Clinical Excellence‡ | |
Date of statement | 2010 | 2004 | 2010 |
Diagnostic testing | Chest radiograph, oximetry, ABGs, and ECG. Other testing as warranted by clinical indication. | Chest radiograph, oxygen saturation, ABGs, ECG, sputum Gram stain, and culture | Chest radiograph, ABG, ECG, complete blood count, sputum smear and culture, blood cultures if febrile |
Bronchodilator therapy | Inhaled short-acting ß2-agonist is recommended. Consider ipratropium if inadequate clinical response. Consider theophylline or aminophylline as second-line intravenous therapy. | Inhaled short-acting ß2-agonist and/or ipratropium with spacer or nebulizer, as needed | Administer inhaled drugs by nebulizer or handheld inhaler. Specific agents and dosing regimens are not specified. Consider theophylline if response to inhaled bronchodilators is inadequate. |
Antibiotics | Recommended if (1) increases in dyspnea, sputum volume, and sputum purulence all are present; (2) increase in sputum purulence along with increase in either dyspnea or sputum volume; or (3) need for assisted ventilation. See original document for complex treatment algorithm. | Base choice on local bacterial resistance patterns. Consider amoxicillin/clavulanate or respiratory fluoroquinolones. If Pseudomonas species and/or other Enterobacteriaceae are suspected, consider combination therapy. | Administer only if history of purulent sputum. Initiate with an aminopenicillin, a macrolide, or a tetracycline, taking into account local bacterial resistance patterns. Adjust therapy according to sputum and blood cultures. |
Systemic corticosteroids | Daily prednisolone 30-40 mg (or its equivalent) orally for 7-10 days | Daily prednisone 30-40 mg orally for 10-14 days; equivalent dose intravenously if unable to tolerate oral intake Consider inhaled corticosteroids. | Daily prednisolone 30 mg (or its equivalent) orally for 7-14 days |
Supplemental oxygen | Maintain oxygen saturation >90%. Monitor ABGs for hypercapnia and acidosis. | Maintain oxygen saturation >90%. Monitor ABGs for hypercapnia and acidosis. | Maintain oxygen saturation within the individualized target range. Monitor ABGs. |
Assisted ventilation | Indications for NPPV include severe dyspnea, acidosis (pH ≤7.35) and/or hypercapnia (PCO2 >45 mm Hg), and RR >25 breaths/min. Contraindications to NPPV include respiratory arrest, hemodynamic instability, impaired mental status, copious bronchial secretions, and extreme obesity. Intubate if contraindication to NPPV or failure of NPPV (worsening ABGs or clinical status). Consider likelihood of recovery and patient’s wishes and expectations before intubation. | Consider with pH <7.35 and PCO2 >45-60 mm Hg and RR >24 breaths/min. Institute NPPV in a controlled environment, unless there are contraindications (e.g., respiratory arrest, hemodynamic instability, impaired mental status, copious bronchial secretions, and extreme obesity). Intubate if contraindication to NPPV or failure of NPPV (worsening ABGs or clinical status). | NPPV treatment of choice for persistent hypercapnic respiratory failure. Consider functional status, body mass index, home oxygen, comorbidities, prior ICU admissions, age, and FEV1 when assessing suitability for intubation and ventilation. |
∗ Data from http://www.goldcopd.com.
† Data from MacNee W: Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper. Eur Respir J 23:932-946, 2004.
‡ Data from http://www.nice.org.uk.
From Goldman L, Schafer AI (eds): Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012.
TABLE 11-10
Wells Clinical Prediction Rule for Likelihood of Pulmonary Embolism
Variable | Points |
Predisposing Factors | |
Previous VTE | 1.5 |
Recent surgery or immobilization | 1.5 |
Cancer | 1 |
Symptoms | |
Hemoptysis | 1 |
Signs | |
HR >100 bpm | 1.5 |
Clinical signs of DVT | 3 |
Clinical Judgment | |
Alternative diagnosis less likely than PE | 3 |
Clinical Probability | Total Points |
Low | <2 |
Moderate | 2-6 |
High | >6 |
Modified from Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al: Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 129:997-1005, 1998.
Diagnosis
H&P







Labs



Imaging





FIGURE 11-8 Integrated strategy for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) using clinical probability assessment, measurement of D-dimer, and computer tomography angiography (CTA) as primary imaging test. Patients with low clinical probability (i.e., PE unlikely, negative D-dimer) need no further testing, but if D-dimer is positive, they should proceed to CTA, and if this is nondiagnostic, to ultrasonography of legs. Then either treat or repeat ultrasound in 1 week. Patients with high clinical probability (i.e., PE likely) need not have D-dimer measure but should proceed directly to CTA. If CTA is not diagnostic, options are to perform ultrasonography of legs or proceed to pulmonary angiogram. If ultrasound of legs is negative, options are to repeat in 1 week or proceed to pulmonary angiography. (From Vincent JL, Abraham E, Moore FA, et al [eds]: Textbook of Critical Care, 6th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2011.)

FIGURE 11-9 Integrated strategy for diagnosis of suspected PE using clinical probability assessment, measurement of D-dimer, and V/Q scan as primary imaging test. Patients with low clinical probability (i.e., PE unlikely, negative D-dimer) need no further investigation. If D-dimer is positive, V/Q scan performed; if not diagnostic, proceed to ultrasound. Then either treat or repeat ultrasound in 1 week. Patients with high probability (i.e., PE likely) need not have D-dimer measured but should proceed directly to V/Q scan. If V/Q scan not diagnostic, options are to perform CTA, pulmonary angiography, or ultrasonography of legs. If ultrasonography is negative, either repeat in 1 week or perform pulmonary angiogram. (From Vincent JL, Abraham E, Moore FA, et al [eds]: Textbook of Critical Care, 6th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2011.)




Treatment


2. Pulmonary Hypertension
Definition
Etiology and Classification
Diagnosis
H&P












Labs





Imaging




TABLE 11-11
Updated Clinical Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension
ALK1, Activin receptor-like kinase type 1; BMPR2, bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2.
Modified From Simonneau G et al: Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:S43-S54, 2009.
Treatment
Acute Rx



Chronic Rx






TABLE 11-12
Overview of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias
Diagnosis | Clinical Findings | HRCT Features | Differential Diagnosis |
UIP/IPF | 40-70 yr, M>F; >6-mo dyspnea, cough, crackles, clubbing; poor response to steroids | Peripheral, basal, subpleural reticulation and honeycombing, ± ground-glass opacity | Collagen vascular disease, asbestosis, CHP, scleroderma, drugs (bleomycin, methotrexate) |
NSIP | 40-50 yr, M = F; dyspnea, cough, fatigue, crackles; may respond to steroids | Bilateral, patchy, subpleural ground-glass opacity, ± reticulation | Collagen vascular disease, CHP, DIP |
RB-ILD | 30-50 yr, M > F; dyspnea, cough | Ground-glass, centrilobular nodules, ± centrilobular emphysema | Hypersensitivity pneumonitis |
AIP/diffuse alveolar damage | Any age, M = F; acute-onset dyspnea, diffuse crackles and consolidation | Ground-glass consolidation, traction bronchiectasis, and architectural distortion | ARDS, infection, edema, hemorrhage |
COP | Mean 55 yr, M = F; <3-mo hx of cough, dyspnea, fever; may respond to steroids | Subpleural and peribronchial consolidation, ± nodules in lower zones; atoll sign (ring-shaped opacity) | Collagen vascular disease, infection, vasculitis, sarcoidosis, lymphoma, alveolar carcinoma |
DIP | 30-54 yr, M > F; insidious onset weeks to months of dyspnea, cough | Ground-glass opacity, lower zone, peripheral | Hypersensitivity pneumonitis, NSIP |
LIP | Any age, F > M | Ground-glass opacity, ± poorly defined centrilobular nodules, thin-walled cysts, and air trapping | DIP, NSIP, hypersensitivity pneumonitis |
AIP, Acute interstitial pneumonia; CHP, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis; COP, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia; DIP, desquamative interstitial pneumonitis; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; LIP, lymphoid interstitial pneumonia; NSIP, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; RB-ILD, respiratory bronchiolitis–associated interstitial lung disease; UIP, usual interstitial pneumonia.
From Ferri F: Ferri’s Clinical Advisor: 5 Books in 1. 2013 edition. Philadelphia, Mosby, 2012.
I. Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease
1. Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)
Diagnosis
H&P





Labs




Imaging (Box 11-5)

