Psychiatric Assessment of Children and Adolescents

Published on 10/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 10/06/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2688 times

chapter 14 Psychiatric Assessment of Children and Adolescents

Community studies indicate that approximately one in five children and adolescents suffer from some type of psychiatric disorder, and at least 12% of young people have clinically important mental disorders. This chapter focuses on pediatric clinical skills useful in identifying psychiatric disturbances in childhood and adolescence. One of the major challenges in evaluating children and adolescents for the presence of psychiatric disturbance is that emotional and behavioral symptoms occur commonly in this age group; a disorder is present when there are clinically significant symptoms associated with impairment. For example, in disruptive behavioral problems, most children have a few antisocial symptoms, but very few have a large number of symptoms associated with impairment. We hope that the assessment strategies outlined here will assist clinicians working with children and adolescents to distinguish those who require further evaluation and/or treatment from those who need no further intervention.

We provide guidelines for the approach to the clinical interview and the content, including:

For the sake of brevity, the word child will be used to refer to all ages, including adolescents up to age 18 years, throughout the chapter unless otherwise specified.

Clinical Interview

The clinical interview with children and parents is the best way to assess behavioral and emotional disturbances. Whenever possible, history about an emotional or behavioral problem should be obtained from multiple informants, preferably including the child, parent (both, if more than one is available), and teachers or daycare personnel.

It is well documented that there is only moderate agreement among different informants in describing the same child, including the parent-child agreement. Reasons for these differences include:

If the child is in a two-parent family, both parents should be invited to the first interview. If only one parent attends, you should emphasize the importance of meeting with the other parent. Families vary in structure and membership; it should not be assumed that a child is living with a mother and a father.

Format

It is not unusual for the child and/or family members to be uncomfortable about discussing mental health concerns and to be reluctant about attending the interview. Children may have received no advance information about the visit and have little understanding about the need for the assessment. Establishing a friendly atmosphere and clearly outlining the plan for assessment (e.g., explaining who will be interviewed and in what order) helps reduce anxiety and facilitates the gathering of information. You should encourage family members to express their concerns, and ask them why they have come to see you. Be prepared for responses such as, “Because my family doctor told me to.” Such comments should be followed up by asking the family members what they hope to accomplish by this meeting, apart from what others may have suggested. The following guidelines are useful in planning the interview:

Confidentiality

Parents and children should be informed early in the interview about issues of confidentiality. Children should not be assured of absolute confidentiality because issues about self-harm or abuse may arise. If children are assured that nothing will be shared with any other person and, subsequently, an issue such as abuse surfaces during the interview that must be disclosed to others, it can lead to feelings of betrayal. Such situations can result in a serious disruption of the therapeutic alliance. We find it useful to inform the child in developmentally appropriate terms that what is discussed is confidential unless it involves someone’s safety (e.g., people hurting themselves or being hurt by others). With young children, it is helpful to explore their understanding of the concept of safety.

An example of how to discuss confidentiality follows: “I will not tell anyone what you and I talk about without you saying it’s all right, unless it has to do with someone’s safety.” “Do you know what safety means?” (Often the child, depending on the age, can provide an explanation. It is still helpful to clarify what you mean by safety). “If you, or someone you know, is hurting themselves or being hurt by someone else, then that’s a problem with safety.”

The clinician and the child can decide together what information can be discussed with parents. Often a focus on themes, rather than specific comments, can be shared with the child’s permission. “I will be meeting with your parent(s), but we can decide together what is okay to share with them.” Parents are sometimes reluctant to have their child interviewed alone. They may be worried about what the child will say about them or their home situation. Parents should be reassured that it is a routine part of the assessment to get the child’s perspective.

Obtaining the Presenting History

The following guidelines outline the approach to obtaining presenting history from the parents and children:

1. Encourage each person to describe the problem in his or her own way. An open inquiry followed by more focused questions later in the interview provides the most information. Examples of open versus more directive questions are provided in Chapter 1. At times a child will respond repeatedly with “I don’t know.” It is important to determine whether the patient genuinely does not understand or whether this response is to avoid answering the question. Rephrasing the question or giving examples can assist with the former situation. When avoidance is suspected, it can be helpful to ask the patient directly, but in a nonthreatening way, whether the repeated “I don’t know” means he or she is having trouble comprehending or whether there are barriers to answering the question. It can be useful to explain how such responses can be confusing, and that an alternative such as “I don’t want to talk about that” is preferable if indeed that is the case.

The following case example illustrates how information from multiple sources is important in addressing emotional and behavioral symptoms and in moving toward a diagnosis and treatment plan.

Case History 1

History. Emma (age 7) and her parents were referred by their family physician because of Emma’s teacher’s concerns about her withdrawn behavior at school and her lack of friends. According to her parents, Emma played well at home with her 4-year-old sister and often helped with chores around the house. She appeared happy and enjoyed doing errands with her mother. Neither parent had observed any problems with Emma. They thought she was likely just shy at school and would become more sociable with time. Her second grade teacher noted early on that Emma did not interact with her classmates and often wanted to stay in the classroom during recess. Emma appeared to understand her schoolwork and completed it without difficulty. However, she resisted saying anything in class and refused to work in groups with other children. She often stayed behind in the classroom until everyone else had left. When Emma was interviewed individually, she initially denied any problems and said that her parents and her sister were her friends; she did not need anyone else. As the clinician probed further, Emma admitted to being very lonely but feeling too self-conscious to interact with peers. She acknowledged feeling so worried about meeting other children that she hated school. Together the clinician and Emma talked about sharing this information with her parents. At first Emma was hesitant but then agreed that it was important for her parents to know how she had been feeling. Both parents were supportive of Emma as she told them, assisted by the clinician, about how she had been feeling at school. They agreed to meet with the teacher to discuss ways of helping Emma with her anxiety about interacting with classmates and were referred to a child psychiatrist for further assessment to determine whether Emma needed additional treatment for her anxiety symptoms.