Psychiatric Assessment of Children and Adolescents

Published on 10/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Pediatrics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2854 times

chapter 14 Psychiatric Assessment of Children and Adolescents

Community studies indicate that approximately one in five children and adolescents suffer from some type of psychiatric disorder, and at least 12% of young people have clinically important mental disorders. This chapter focuses on pediatric clinical skills useful in identifying psychiatric disturbances in childhood and adolescence. One of the major challenges in evaluating children and adolescents for the presence of psychiatric disturbance is that emotional and behavioral symptoms occur commonly in this age group; a disorder is present when there are clinically significant symptoms associated with impairment. For example, in disruptive behavioral problems, most children have a few antisocial symptoms, but very few have a large number of symptoms associated with impairment. We hope that the assessment strategies outlined here will assist clinicians working with children and adolescents to distinguish those who require further evaluation and/or treatment from those who need no further intervention.

We provide guidelines for the approach to the clinical interview and the content, including:

For the sake of brevity, the word child will be used to refer to all ages, including adolescents up to age 18 years, throughout the chapter unless otherwise specified.

Clinical Interview

The clinical interview with children and parents is the best way to assess behavioral and emotional disturbances. Whenever possible, history about an emotional or behavioral problem should be obtained from multiple informants, preferably including the child, parent (both, if more than one is available), and teachers or daycare personnel.

It is well documented that there is only moderate agreement among different informants in describing the same child, including the parent-child agreement. Reasons for these differences include:

If the child is in a two-parent family, both parents should be invited to the first interview. If only one parent attends, you should emphasize the importance of meeting with the other parent. Families vary in structure and membership; it should not be assumed that a child is living with a mother and a father.

Format

It is not unusual for the child and/or family members to be uncomfortable about discussing mental health concerns and to be reluctant about attending the interview. Children may have received no advance information about the visit and have little understanding about the need for the assessment. Establishing a friendly atmosphere and clearly outlining the plan for assessment (e.g., explaining who will be interviewed and in what order) helps reduce anxiety and facilitates the gathering of information. You should encourage family members to express their concerns, and ask them why they have come to see you. Be prepared for responses such as, “Because my family doctor told me to.” Such comments should be followed up by asking the family members what they hope to accomplish by this meeting, apart from what others may have suggested. The following guidelines are useful in planning the interview:

Confidentiality

Parents and children should be informed early in the interview about issues of confidentiality. Children should not be assured of absolute confidentiality because issues about self-harm or abuse may arise. If children are assured that nothing will be shared with any other person and, subsequently, an issue such as abuse surfaces during the interview that must be disclosed to others, it can lead to feelings of betrayal. Such situations can result in a serious disruption of the therapeutic alliance. We find it useful to inform the child in developmentally appropriate terms that what is discussed is confidential unless it involves someone’s safety (e.g., people hurting themselves or being hurt by others). With young children, it is helpful to explore their understanding of the concept of safety.

An example of how to discuss confidentiality follows: “I will not tell anyone what you and I talk about without you saying it’s all right, unless it has to do with someone’s safety.” “Do you know what safety means?” (Often the child, depending on the age, can provide an explanation. It is still helpful to clarify what you mean by safety). “If you, or someone you know, is hurting themselves or being hurt by someone else, then that’s a problem with safety.”

The clinician and the child can decide together what information can be discussed with parents. Often a focus on themes, rather than specific comments, can be shared with the child’s permission. “I will be meeting with your parent(s), but we can decide together what is okay to share with them.” Parents are sometimes reluctant to have their child interviewed alone. They may be worried about what the child will say about them or their home situation. Parents should be reassured that it is a routine part of the assessment to get the child’s perspective.

Obtaining the Presenting History

The following guidelines outline the approach to obtaining presenting history from the parents and children:

1. Encourage each person to describe the problem in his or her own way. An open inquiry followed by more focused questions later in the interview provides the most information. Examples of open versus more directive questions are provided in Chapter 1. At times a child will respond repeatedly with “I don’t know.” It is important to determine whether the patient genuinely does not understand or whether this response is to avoid answering the question. Rephrasing the question or giving examples can assist with the former situation. When avoidance is suspected, it can be helpful to ask the patient directly, but in a nonthreatening way, whether the repeated “I don’t know” means he or she is having trouble comprehending or whether there are barriers to answering the question. It can be useful to explain how such responses can be confusing, and that an alternative such as “I don’t want to talk about that” is preferable if indeed that is the case.

The following case example illustrates how information from multiple sources is important in addressing emotional and behavioral symptoms and in moving toward a diagnosis and treatment plan.

Case History 1

History. Emma (age 7) and her parents were referred by their family physician because of Emma’s teacher’s concerns about her withdrawn behavior at school and her lack of friends. According to her parents, Emma played well at home with her 4-year-old sister and often helped with chores around the house. She appeared happy and enjoyed doing errands with her mother. Neither parent had observed any problems with Emma. They thought she was likely just shy at school and would become more sociable with time. Her second grade teacher noted early on that Emma did not interact with her classmates and often wanted to stay in the classroom during recess. Emma appeared to understand her schoolwork and completed it without difficulty. However, she resisted saying anything in class and refused to work in groups with other children. She often stayed behind in the classroom until everyone else had left. When Emma was interviewed individually, she initially denied any problems and said that her parents and her sister were her friends; she did not need anyone else. As the clinician probed further, Emma admitted to being very lonely but feeling too self-conscious to interact with peers. She acknowledged feeling so worried about meeting other children that she hated school. Together the clinician and Emma talked about sharing this information with her parents. At first Emma was hesitant but then agreed that it was important for her parents to know how she had been feeling. Both parents were supportive of Emma as she told them, assisted by the clinician, about how she had been feeling at school. They agreed to meet with the teacher to discuss ways of helping Emma with her anxiety about interacting with classmates and were referred to a child psychiatrist for further assessment to determine whether Emma needed additional treatment for her anxiety symptoms.

Specific features of the interview with parent(s)

5. Explore additional issues as listed in Chapter 1. Some aspects of the history (e.g., family violence) are more appropriately discussed with each parent separately. However, parents sometimes learn more about their partner when interviewed together about past and family history.

Specific features of a family interview with parents and children

Family discord and disruption are strongly linked to psychiatric problems in children. The importance of family dynamics has been highlighted in Chapter 1; it is essential to assess (even briefly) the interpersonal relationships and interactions with at least the parent(s) and child with the presenting complaint and preferably the child’s siblings. Family interviewing is occasionally contraindicated, for example, in child abuse when the alleged perpetrator is a family member or when there is the potential for violence. Guidelines for family interviewing in the course of a psychiatric assessment are as follows:

Assessing Symptoms

Child and adolescent psychiatric disorders are commonly divided into the broad categories of emotional and behavioral problems. The following sections suggest specific approaches to assessing symptoms in these two areas. Classification systems, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM) or the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases (ICD) provide detailed information about the criteria used in making a specific diagnosis. The DSM and ICD are both classification systems for the identification of psychiatric disturbances in children and youth. (DSM-V should be available in 2013.) Morrison and Anders provide a useful summary of DSM-IV, as it applies to children, for those who are interested in further information. They emphasize that DSM-IV is a “snapshot” in time, and the criteria frequently change as new information about mental disorders in childhood and adolescence becomes available from clinical studies.

Disruptive behavioral problems

Disruptive behavior is one of the most frequent categories of disorder brought to the attention of pediatricians. Bear in mind that some oppositional behavior is developmentally normal in early childhood and adolescence. What distinguishes disruptive behavior problems from other psychiatric conditions is the destructive, intrusive, and sometimes dangerous behavior that affects others.

Many children are inaccurate reporters of attentional or other disruptive behavioral problems. They may be unaware of their own excessive activity or may underreport aggressive behavior. Careful attention should be given to reports by children, parents, and teachers of behavioral problems and to the level of agreement among them.

Some issues to consider when assessing children and youth with behavioral problems are the following:

Some specific questions about disruptive behavioral problems include:

Examples of questions about anger and aggression include:

Substance abuse

Many adolescents and some younger children experiment with drugs, whereas a smaller number of youth actually use them on a regular basis. Use of alcohol and tobacco by youth exceeds use of other classes of drugs. The true extent of child and adolescent substance abuse is difficult to determine because of such factors as difficulty differentiating casual from regular usage. Many youth who misuse substances have other psychiatric conditions, such as disruptive behavior problems, anxiety, or depressive disorders. In assessing substance abuse, the following questions may be helpful:

These questions can assist in determining the extent and pattern of substance abuse. Although occasional or experimental use should not be overemphasized, youth often underreport drug and alcohol use and deny associated impairment. The pediatrician must maintain a high index of suspicion and carefully ask adolescents about drug and alcohol consumption.

Depression

Major depressive disorder occurs in approximately 5% of adolescents and is more common in girls than in boys. Serious clinical depression is much less common in children than in adolescents but does occur, especially if there is a history of depressive disorder in one or both of the parents. In children, studies have found that it occurs either equally in boys and girls or is more common in boys. In assessing depressive disorder in a young person, consider the following:

Anxiety

Anxiety disorders are very common and occur in between 8% and 27% of children and adolescents. Like depression, anxiety falls on a continuous spectrum from normal to abnormal. As with sadness, a central question is the degree of impairment: Is the symptom(s) interfering with the child’s ability to participate in developmentally appropriate activities?

Other diagnostic considerations that may help determine the presence of pathologic anxiety include:

In determining whether emotional symptoms are abnormal, consider the intrusiveness and impact of the problem on the child’s life. For example, how much is anxiety interfering with their daily activities?

While older children and adolescents will generally understand the concept of anxiety, younger children should be asked about things that frighten or worry them. Children may manifest or express anxiety through physical symptoms; headaches and stomach aches are particularly common. Although parents are often aware of these common physical symptoms, children may not mention other symptoms, such as sweating, palpitations, dizziness, trouble breathing, and fear of dying.

One of the types of anxiety conditions that until recently was thought to be rare in children and adolescents is obsessive-compulsive disorder. Based on recent studies, it is now clear that this condition often begins in childhood and may affect as many as 1% to 2% of adolescents. Children may keep their obsessive thoughts and compulsive behavior a secret. It is important to ask whether children experience an urge to check things repeatedly or have a specific order in which they have to do certain tasks.

Case History 2

History. Robert (age 13) had always been an excellent student who was well-liked by his peers. In eighth grade, his marks began to slip, and his mother noticed that he was tired and subdued much of the time. She and Robert’s father had separated two years earlier, but he was able to spend time with both parents and had appeared to adapt to the situation reasonably well. When Robert’s mother met with the teacher, she was informed that Robert was not completing his assignments. Robert’s mother expressed confusion because her son typically spent 3 hours a night in his room on homework. Robert was referred to the school guidance counselor who developed a rapport with him. He confided to the counselor that he had trouble completing his work because of the tasks he had to do before starting on his assignment. At first the counselor thought Robert was referring to chores but, on further questioning, she realized that he was referring to certain rituals. Robert explained that he had to count things in his room (such as the books on the shelf) and the number of words on the pages of his assignment before he could do his homework. If he lost count he had to start over and frequently became so tired that he did not finish his assignment. According to Robert, he had to follow these rituals to ward off bad things from happening, such as his mother or father becoming ill. Robert admitted that it sounded crazy, but he could not stop himself from counting.

As in this case, there is often considerable overlap among symptoms of anxiety and depressive disorders in both childhood and adolescence.

Suicidal ideation and behavior

Suicidal behavior is uncommon in childhood and early adolescence but increases significantly in older adolescence. Many people wrongly assume that young children do not experience suicidal thoughts and are not at risk for attempting suicide. Large surveys show that up to 20% of high school students experience thoughts of suicide, and about 10% exhibit suicidal behavior. Ask the child or youth directly about thoughts of suicide. These questions should be asked without the parent present. Examples of the way these questions can be asked include, “Have you ever thought that life is not worth living?” and “Have you ever thought about taking your own life or not being alive anymore?”

When there is suicidal ideation or a youth has attempted suicide, the next step is to assess intent by asking about the events and precipitants leading up to the episode or associated with the thoughts of suicide. Children vary in their level of comprehension about death, depending on their age and developmental stage. In evaluating suicidal ideation or behavior, the clinician should explore the child’s concept of what would happen. Examples of possible questions to ask include:

Suicidal thoughts and behavior should be asked about routinely. Children will not usually volunteer this information, and parents are often unaware that their children are experiencing suicidal thoughts. When asking about possible precipitants or stressors, it is important to avoid minimizing problems. While the break-up of a relationship or being embarrassed among peers may not seem like major stressors to some, such experiences can be extremely demoralizing and may be associated with feelings of hopelessness among youth.

Risk of completed suicide increases with certain associated features:

Psychosis

Children and adolescents can show the same symptoms of psychotic illness as do adults, although such symptoms are uncommon in childhood. The two main features of psychotic disorders are hallucinations and delusions. The clinician should differentiate the presence of these potentially serious symptoms from other more common and benign phenomena (e.g., imaginary companions and fantasies).

Inquiry about hallucinations should include auditory and visual experiences. The questions can be incorporated into the systems review focusing on eyes and ears:

A similar approach can be used with auditory hallucinations. Remember that hallucinations that occur only when falling asleep or on wakening are generally normal phenomena. When asking about hallucinations, explore the source, location, number, identity, content, and effect of the experiences on the youth. If hallucinations are present, consider the following possibilities in addition to primary psychiatric disorders: drug intoxication, seizure disorder, infection, and metabolic disorder.

A delusion is a false belief that cannot be changed by logical argument or evidence against it. Such beliefs often involve bizarre or unusual thinking. Few studies have carefully assessed delusions in childhood; they are rare before late adolescence. Among psychotic youth, delusions are often paranoid or persecutory. For example, a teen may complain of being followed or poisoned. Sometimes, delusions have religious themes. A useful question is, “Have you ever had thoughts that scare you or upset you?” Although children may have erroneous views about people or events, actual delusions are rare in childhood.

Inquiring about child maltreatment

(See Chapter 21.)

Children and adolescents are often victims of some type of maltreatment, including physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, emotional abuse, or exposure to domestic violence. It is estimated that between one in three and one in four adults reported experiencing either physical or sexual abuse during childhood. Much less is known about the prevalence of other types of maltreatment. In most regions, it is the responsibility of child protection agencies to carry out investigative interviews when child maltreatment is suspected. Nevertheless, the pediatrician should include questions about child maltreatment in any psychiatric assessment.

Examples of questions to elicit concerns about child maltreatment:

This clinical area presents an exception to the earlier comments about note-taking. If a child or youth discloses information about any type of maltreatment, attempts should be made to document the statements verbatim. It is helpful to record the wording of questions asked by the clinician and the child’s response. It is generally not advisable to ask detailed questions about a disclosure of maltreatment because, in many jurisdictions, a child protection agency worker needs to obtain the disclosure. Similarly, use of anatomically correct dolls should be reserved for specialized interviews requested by the child protection agency and performed by a clinician trained in their use. Children should not be subjected to multiple interviews by clinicians without specialized training in this area.

Although videotaping offers a complete record of an interview, there are problems associated with it. Videotapes may be used inappropriately; for example, details about how the child was interviewed may take precedence over the child’s verbal statements. At this time, there are not sufficient advantages to recommend videotaping psychiatric interviews, even if abuse is suspected.

Interviewing patients with mental retardation

As in any clinical encounter, the clinician should adapt the duration, format, and questions of an assessment to what the child and family can tolerate. In addition to cognitive impairment, patients with mental retardation may have other behavioral and emotional problems, such as aggression, self-injury, hyperactivity, depression, and anxiety. Sometimes the psychiatric assessment of children and youth with mental retardation is neglected, particularly when verbal skills are impaired. There is evidence that emotional disorders are present to a greater degree in patients with mental retardation compared to those without, but often such problems are not recognized. The following are some important considerations when interviewing a pediatric patient with mental retardation:

Morrison and Anders suggest that one of the major challenges in interviewing mentally retarded children and adolescents is to “pitch the questions at just the right level—neither so complex as to confuse nor so simple as to insult.” They recommend paying close attention to the patient’s response to the first open-ended question, as a way of gauging how to conduct the remainder of the interview.

Standardized Interviews and Questionnaires

Structured psychiatric interviews and rating scales for both children and parents have been developed to improve the validity and reliability of observations and information about emotional and behavioral problems. Generally, these tools are most useful for research purposes; however, there are a few measures that may be helpful to the clinician.

Structured interviews are comprehensive and decrease the chance that an area will be forgotten. They were developed originally to improve the quality of information collected during mental health assessments. However, they are typically time-consuming and may interfere with building rapport.

Questionnaires or rating scales that ask about behavior can be useful for obtaining information from multiple sources. Generally, these scales are focused on behaviors and do not ask in-depth or detailed questions. Such scales can be particularly helpful when seeking information from schools. Several teacher questionnaires have satisfactory reliability and validity, including:

Each of these instruments has parallel versions for completion by parents so that systematic information can be obtained about a list of behaviors. These are screening instruments, however, and should not be used for making specific diagnoses.