Problems in older people

Published on 10/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1236 times

Chapter 8 Problems in older people

Introduction

Medical emergencies are common in older people and they may have difficulty accessing suitable health care once their GP practice is closed. They are less likely to use schemes such as NHS Direct than other parts of the population.1 They or their carers are more likely to dial 999 if they have an urgent medical problem. The care of the elderly is an increasing proportion of work for GP out-of-hours services, ambulance services and Emergency Departments.

The acute medical problems of older people are often similar to those of younger adults but the presentation can be atypical or there can be a number of co-existing problems that make diagnosis difficult. Further difficulties occur in frailer, older adults who continue to manage at home despite the effects of increasing age and multiple medical problems. In these patients an apparently minor illness can lead to deterioration in a non-specific manner leading to immobility, a fall or acute confusion. The social circumstances and the availability of social support may be of greater importance than the management of the medical illness. Treatment at home is often the preferred and safest option. If a careful clinical and social assessment indicates that the primary problems require social support or nursing expertise, then clinicians must have the option of referring to community support schemes that are now more widely available.

However, major illnesses such as serious infections, heart disease and cancer can also present in a non-specific way. If the presence of one of these conditions is a possibility, then a planned short admission for investigation or early clinic review will be preferable to leaving the patient at home with subsequent admission in a worse condition at a later time.

The management of trauma and surgical emergencies is covered in other chapters. Discussion of single organ emergency problems in older adults such as myocardial infarction will be brief because they should be dealt with in a very similar way to their management in younger adults.

The main emphasis of this chapter is the assessment of physical state, mental state, medication and social circumstances in older adults presenting in a less specific manner such as with general deterioration, falls, confusion and minor injuries.

Primary survey positive patients

The criteria for recognition of immediately life threatening problems are the same as for younger patients (Box 8.1). However the interpretation of vital signs may be more difficult and abnormalities need to be taken in context of pre-existing morbidity. A history from a reliable witness is essential. Previous neurological problems can make the GCS permanently <12. Similarly, the elderly are more prone to excessive bradycardia from cardiac medication but on the other hand, symptomatic heart block is common. Oxygen saturations should be interpreted in light of the known medical history and clinical setting.

Primary survey positive patients should be transferred as soon as possible by paramedic ambulance to an A&E Department or an Emergency Admissions Unit depending on local protocols. The exception might be those patients with documented ‘end of life decisions’ such as Advanced Directives and clear, agreed treatment plans which might include ‘do not attempt resuscitation’ (DNAR) orders.

More than any other group of patients, the older adult might refuse transfer to hospital. If gentle coaxing has failed, carers and family can often be more persuasive. Sometimes it is necessary to consider whether the patient has the mental capacity to refuse transfer for assessment and treatment. In this situation it is possible to agree with family and carers that it is in the patient’s best interests to be taken to hospital, especially if they are suffering from serious life-threatening illness. Clear documentation of such decisions is essential in this situation.

Primary survey negative patients

In the elderly patient a greater emphasis must be given to factors other than the ‘medical problem’ alone. The variables to be considered are given in Box 8.2.

Non-specific presentations of illness in older patients

Patients presenting with non-specific complaints make up a large proportion of most hospitals’ acute medical admissions. The presentation can be with confusion, falls, being ‘off legs’ or with the label of being ‘a social admission’.

These ‘non-specific’ presentations are common and create significant diagnostic and management problems. A seemingly minor injury or illness can be due to several underlying medical conditions. The commonest causes of ‘non-specific’ presentations are listed in Box 8.3. Full details are listed in many textbooks.2 The presenting complaint may be determined more by pre-existing mental or physical frailty than the acute illness.

The rest of this chapter will address the management of these patients by emergency community care clinicians or GPs. This will include taking a history, performing a focused physical and mental status examination and formulating a management plan.

Objective information – examination

Vital signs (Box 8.4) are, as always, important but may be altered by pre-existing morbidity. The GCS is the most obvious example where pre-existing confusion will make assessment of the verbal score difficult. Similarly, pulse and blood pressure may be altered by pre-existing medications such as β-blockers. Any concern about the vital signs or general appearance of the patient should trigger an immediate hospital assessment.

The next stage is a focused systems examination. A full examination is required but given the huge number of problems causing falls or confusion certain areas should be given additional emphasis. The examination described in Box 8.5 is aimed at patients with falls but most also applies to patients with confusion, including assessments of both physical and mental status.

There are many tools available for the assessment of cognitive function. Each has limitations but they can give an indication of problems with cognition and can be used to follow progress. Box 8.6 shows the 10-question Hodkinson Abbreviated Mental Test score which combines brevity with validity. Questions have to be asked in the order shown and are given 1 mark for the correct answer or no mark. A score below 8 out of 10 implies cognitive impairment.

Treat and leave/review

Details of treatment of specific minor injuries are described in Chapter 13. Patients with minor illness can be treated at home if adequate support is available. However, it should be ensured that the patient and their carers clearly understand when and how to seek further advice or help if their condition does not improve or deteriorates. If patients do not require further referral their GP must still be informed of the ‘emergency’ episode and they can then decide when to review the patient.

Examples of treat and leave patients include those with chronic balance and gait problems despite support from the falls service, those with an obvious minor infection suitable for treatment with oral antibiotics, or those with soft tissue injury but no bony tenderness and requiring only simple analgesia.

Treat and refer

Many emergency calls reveal increased social care or community nursing needs. The occurrence of a previously un-investigated, non-specific presentation of illness in an older person also highlights the need for referral for a specialist assessment that can be started in Primary Care. Most health communities now have care pathways for dealing with patients presenting in a variety of ways – for example, following a fall. Those involved in emergency care must know how to access these pathways of care and how to obtain rapid response nursing and social care.

Another example suitable for treat and refer might be a patient who has fallen with a brief loss of consciousness or short period of palpitations. If they have recovered and have a normal 12-lead ECG they may be suitable to be left at home but referred for urgent review in a hospital or community clinic. An abnormal 12-lead ECG in the patient with loss of consciousness would, however, require hospital assessment.

Another reason for referral to hospital would be for X-rays to exclude fracture. Referral pathways should be established to enable the community emergency practitioner to directly refer patients for an appropriate X-ray with varying urgency. X-ray of what might be a minor fracture may be deferred if pain can be controlled with simple analgesics to avoid an admission in the middle of the night. However, if the patient is unable to care for themselves or the suspected fracture is associated with significant pain or neurovascular problems, an X-ray may be required in a shorter time-scale. Self-mobilising patients with suspected bony injuries to the upper limbs will rarely require transfer by emergency ambulance and alternative forms of transport should be considered.

Treat and transfer

There are several groups of patients in this category. Some have worrying symptoms, as in Box 8.7. Others are less ill but lack suitable support at home or appropriate services to support the patient at home cannot be organised. If a bed in an Intermediate Care facility cannot be arranged, these patients will need to be taken to hospital. Finally, there are those who cannot be properly assessed at home and who need to be brought to the Emergency Department for this to be done.

When transfer is required, the community emergency practitioner can make an important contribution to the work of the ambulance service by recommending the most appropriate form of transport for patients requiring admission. For example, a patient requiring no care other than assistance to get to the vehicle will not require a paramedic staffed emergency ambulance, and can be safely cared for by staff with more limited training, thus preserving scarce resources for those patients most likely to benefit from them.

Summary

Practitioners dealing with emergencies in older adults in the community must be able to recognise the atypical presentation of illness in older people and have a high index of suspicion that apparently innocent symptoms can be the presentation of serious underlying pathology. It must also be remembered that the common medical emergencies of younger adults generally occur more frequently in older adults and require similar treatment.

Necessary skills include clear communication with patients although on occasions witnesses must be used to obtain relevant information. A focused examination including a mental state test is often necessary when dealing with non-specific illness in the older patient and when determining if someone can be left at home.

A home visit allows assessment of the patient’s social circumstances and emergency practitioners might sometimes need to make adjustments to ensure the safety of the patient in their surroundings if they are to be left at home or subject to a delay in transfer. Evidence of neglect by the patient or by others should also be looked for when attending the patient at home. The combination of social and medical assessment, linked to knowledge of the services available locally will determine where the patient’s care will be best delivered.

With an older patient it is safer to err on the side of caution to avoid denying patients a specialist assessment. For many this will need to be a comprehensive geriatric assessment performed after the emergency episode has passed.