Postoperative Cardiac Recovery and Outcomes

Published on 24/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Anesthesiology

Last modified 24/02/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2117 times

33 Postoperative Cardiac Recovery and Outcomes

Key points

Cardiac anesthesia itself has fundamentally shifted from a high-dose narcotic technique to a more balanced approach using moderate-dose narcotics, shorter-acting muscle relaxants, and volatile anesthetics. This primarily has been driven by a realization that high-dose narcotics delay extubation and recovery after surgery. This new paradigm also has led to renewed interest in perioperative pain management involving multimodal techniques that facilitate rapid tracheal extubation such as regional blocks, intrathecal morphine (ITM), and supplementary nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In addition to changes in anesthetic practice, the type of patients presenting for cardiac surgery is changing. Patients are now older and have more associated comorbidities (stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], renal failure). Treatment options for coronary artery disease have expanded, ranging from medical therapy only to percutaneous interventions and surgery. Surgical options, however, also have expanded and include conventional coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB), minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, and robotically assisted coronary artery bypass techniques. Change also has taken place in the recovery of cardiac patients. Although cardiac surgical procedures often were associated with a high mortality and long intensive care unit (ICU) stays, the use of moderate doses of narcotics has allowed for rapid ventilator weaning and discharge from the ICU within 24 hours. This has prompted a shift from the classic model of recovering patients in the traditional ICU manner, with weaning protocols and intensive observation, to management more in keeping with the recovery room practice of early extubation and rapid discharge. This, in turn, has shifted the care of cardiac patients to more specialized postcardiac surgical recovery units.

Finally, hard clinical outcomes have driven change in the ongoing management of cardiac patients and are increasingly the focus of research. Intraoperative management now exists within the continuum of preoperative assessment and postoperative care. The outcomes of a patient within the hospital setting are only one small aspect of success. Long-term mortality, morbidity, and quality-of-life indicators are becoming the gold standard in determining benefit or harm for interventions.

This chapter reviews fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA) and its impact on cardiac recovery. The initial perioperative care of routine cardiac surgical cases, including postoperative pain management techniques such as regional blockade and ITM, are discussed, followed by specific management issues of commonly occurring problems in the cardiac ICU. Finally, important cardiac outcomes are reviewed, focusing on the different treatment options available to patients with coronary artery disease and discussing available evidence for their implementation.

Fast-track cardiac surgery care

image

Anesthetic Techniques

Few trials have compared inhalation agents for FTCA. A single trial comparing sevoflurane and isoflurane in patients undergoing valve surgery was unable to demonstrate reductions in tracheal extubation times.1 Several studies have examined the effectiveness of propofol versus inhalation agent, which demonstrated reductions in myocardial enzyme release (creatine kinase-MB, troponin I) and preservation of myocardial function in patients receiving inhalation agents.25 Although this end point is a surrogate for myocardial damage and does not show improved outcome per se, creatine kinase-MB release post-CABG may be associated with poor outcome6 (Box 33-1).

The choice of muscle relaxant in FTCA is important to reduce the incidence of muscle weakness in the cardiac recovery area (CRA), which may delay tracheal extubation.7 Several randomized trials have compared rocuronium (0.5 to 1 mg/kg) versus pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg) and found significant differences in residual paralysis in the ICU.811 Two studies found statistically significant delays in the time to extubation in the pancuronium group.9,10 None of the trials used reversal agents, so the use of pancuronium appears acceptable as long as neostigmine or edrophonium is administered to patients with residual neuromuscular weakness.

Several trials have examined the use of different short-acting narcotic agents during FTCA. In these trials, fentanyl, remifentanil, and sufentanil all were found to be efficacious for early tracheal extubation.1214 The anesthetic drugs and their suggested dosages are listed in Table 33-1.

TABLE 33-1 Suggested Dosages for Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia

Induction
Narcotic
Fentanyl, 5–10 μg/kg
Sufentanil, 1–3 μg/kg
Remifentanil infusions of 0.5–1.0 μg/kg/min
Muscle relaxant
Rocuronium, 0.5–1 mg/kg
Vecuronium, 1–1.5 mg/kg
Hypnotic
Midazolam, 0.05–0.1 mg/kg
Propofol, 0.5–1.5 mg/kg
Maintenance
Narcotic
Fentanyl, 1–5 μg/kg
Sufentanil, 1–1.5 μg/kg
Remifentanil infusions of 0.5–1.0 μg/kg/min
Hypnotic
Inhalational 0.5–1 MAC
Propofol, 50–100 μg/kg/min
Transfer to CRA
Narcotic
Morphine, 0.1–0.2 mg/kg
Hypnotic
Propofol, 25–75 μg/kg/min

CRA, cardiac recovery area; MAC, minimum alveolar concentration.

From Mollhoff T, Herregods L, Moerman A, et al: Comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in ‘fast track’ coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 87:718, 2001; Engoren M, Luther G, Fenn-Buderer N: A comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil for fast-track cardiac anesthesia. Anesth Analg 93:859, 2001; and Cheng DC, Newman MF, Duke P, et al: The efficacy and resource utilization of remifentanil and fentanyl in fast-track coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A prospective randomized, double-blinded controlled, multi-center trial. Anesth Analg 92:1094, 2001.

image

Evidence Supporting Fast-Track Cardiac Recovery

Several randomized trials and one meta-analysis of randomized trials have addressed the question of safety of FTCA.1521 None of the trials was able to demonstrate differences in outcomes between the fast-track group and the conventional anesthesia group (Figure 33-1). The meta-analysis of randomized trials demonstrated a reduction in the duration of intubation by 8 hours (Figure 33-2) and the ICU length of stay (LOS) by 5 hours in favor of the fast-track group. However, the length of hospital stay was not statistically different.

One concern with FTCA is the potential for an increase in the incidence of adverse events, notably awareness. Awareness in patients undergoing FTCA was systematically investigated in a single trial, a prospective observational study of 617 FTCA patients. The reported incidence rate of explicit intraoperative awareness was 0.3% (2/608).22 This is comparable with the reported incidence during conventional cardiac surgery.23 This suggests that FTCA does not increase the incidence of awareness compared with conventional cardiac surgery.

FTCA appears safe in comparison with conventional high-dose narcotic anesthesia. It reduces the duration of ventilation and ICU LOS considerably without increasing the incidence of awareness or other adverse events.20,21 It appears effective at reducing costs and resource utilization.24 As such, it is becoming the standard of care in many cardiac centers. The usual practice at many institutions is to treat all patients as fast-track candidates with the goal of allowing early tracheal extubation for every patient. However, if complications occur that would prevent early tracheal extubation, then the management strategy is modified accordingly. It has been demonstrated that the risk factors for delayed tracheal extubation (> 10 hours) are increased by age, female sex, postoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), inotropes, bleeding, and atrial arrhythmia. The risk factors for prolonged ICU LOS (> 48 hours) are those of delayed tracheal extubation plus preoperative MI and postoperative renal insufficiency.25 Care should be taken to avoid excess bleeding (antifibrinolytics) and to treat arrhythmias either prophylactically or on occurrence (β-blockers, amiodarone).

image

Postcardiac Surgical Recovery Models

The failure of many randomized FTCA trials to show reductions in resource utilization likely stems from the traditional ICU models used by these centers during the study period. Even when trials were combined in a meta-analysis, the ICU LOS was reduced only by 5 hours despite patients being extubated a mean of 8 hours earlier.21 Typically, patients who are extubated within the first 24 hours of ICU admission are transferred to the ward on postoperative day 1 in the morning or early afternoon. This allows the following daytime cardiac cases to have available ICU beds but prevents patient transfers during nighttime hours. Two models have been proposed to deal with this issue: the parallel model and the integrated model (Figure 33-3). In the parallel model, patients are admitted directly to a CRA, where they are monitored with 1:1 nursing care until tracheal extubation. After this, the level of care is reduced to reflect reduced nursing requirements with ratios of 1:2 or 1:3. Any patients requiring overnight ventilation are transferred to the ICU for continuation of care. The primary drawback with the parallel model is the physical separation of the CRA and ICU, which leads to two separate units and, thus, does not eliminate the requirement to transfer patients. The integrated model overcomes these limitations because all patients are admitted to the same physical area, but postoperative management such as nursing-to-patient ratio is variable based on patient requirements.2628 Because nursing care accounts for 45% to 50% of ICU costs, reducing the nursing requirements where possible creates the greatest saving. Other cost savings from reductions in arterial blood gases (ABGs) measurement, use of sedative drugs, and ventilator maintenance are small. The goal is a postoperative unit that allows variable levels of monitoring and care based on patient need.28 Furthermore, FTCA has been demonstrated to be a safe and cost-effective practice that decreases resource utilization after patient discharge from the index hospitalization up to 1-year follow-up.29

Initial management of fast-track cardiac anesthesia patients: the first 24 hours

On arrival in the CRA, initial management of cardiac patients consists of ensuring an efficient transfer of care from operating room (OR) staff to CRA staff, while at the same time maintaining stable patient vital signs. The anesthesiologist should relay important clinical parameters to the CRA team. To accomplish this, many centers have devised hand-off sheets to aid in the transfer of care. Initial laboratory work should be sent (Table 33-2). An electrocardiogram should be ordered, but a chest radiograph is required only in certain circumstances (Table 33-3). The patient’s temperature should be recorded, and if low, active rewarming measures should be initiated with the goal of rewarming the patient to 36.5°C. Shivering may be treated with low doses of meperidine (12.5 to 25 mg intravenously). Hyperthermia, however, is common within the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery and may be associated with an increase in neurocognitive dysfunction, possibly a result of hyperthermia exacerbating cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)–induced neurologic injury30,31 (Box 33-2).

TABLE 33-2 Suggested Initial Laboratory Work in Routine Cases, with Additional Laboratory Work to Be Ordered Where Indicated

Routine
CBC
Electrolytes
BUN/creatinine
aPTT/INR
ABGs
As indicated
Fibrinogen
LFTs (AST/ALT)
Calcium
Magnesium
Cardiac enzymes (CK-MB, CK, troponin I)

ABG, arterial blood gas; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CBC, complete blood count; CK, creatine kinase; CK-MB, creatine kinase myocardium band; INR, international normalized ratio; LFT, liver function test.

TABLE 33-3 Suggested Indications for Ordering a Chest Radiograph

Respiratory
Pao2/Fio2 ratio > 200
Peak pressure > 30 cm H2O
Asymmetric air entry
Circulatory
Uncertainty of pulmonary artery catheter position (poor trace, unable to wedge)
Hypotension resistant to treatment
Excessive bleeding
Gastrointestinal
Nasogastric/orogastric tube feeding
image

Ventilation Management: Admission to Tracheal Extubation

Ventilatory requirements should be managed with the goal of early tracheal extubation in patients (Table 33-4). ABGs are initially drawn within 1/2 hour after admission and then repeated as needed. Patients should be awake and cooperative, be hemodynamically stable, and have no active bleeding with coagulopathy. Respiratory strength should be assessed by hand grip or head lift to ensure complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The patient’s temperature should be more than 36° C, preferably normothermic. When these conditions are met and ABG results are within the reference range, tracheal extubation may take place. ABGs should be drawn about 30 minutes after tracheal extubation to ensure adequate ventilation with maintenance of Pao2 and Paco2. Inability to extubate patients as a result of respiratory failure, hemodynamic instability, or large amounts of mediastinal drainage will necessitate more complex weaning strategies (see Chapter 35). Some patients may arrive after extubation in the OR. Careful attention should be paid to these patients because they may subsequently develop respiratory failure. The patient’s respiratory rate should be monitored every 5 minutes during the first several hours. An ABG should be drawn on admission and 30 minutes later to ensure the patient is not retaining carbon dioxide. If the patient’s respirations become compromised, ventilatory support should be provided. Simple measures such as reminders to breathe may be effective in the narcotized/anesthetized patient. Low doses of naloxone (0.04 mg intravenously) also may be beneficial. Trials of continuous positive airway pressure or bilevel positive airway pressure may provide enough support to allow adequate ventilation. Reintubation should be avoided because it may delay recovery; however, it may become necessary if the earlier mentioned measures fail, resulting in hypoxemia, hypercarbia, and a declining level of consciousness.

TABLE 33-4 Ventilation Management Goals during the Initial Trial of Weaning from Extubation

Initial ventilation parameters
A/C at 10–12 beats/min
TV 8 –10 mL/kg
PEEP 5 cm H2O
Maintain ABGs
pH 7.35–7.45
Paco2 35–45
Pao2 > 90
Saturations > 95%
Extubation criteria
ABGs as above
Awake and alert
Hemodynamically stable
No active bleeding (< 400 mL/2 hr)
Temperature > 36°C
Return of muscle strength (> 5 seconds, head lift/strong hand grip)

ABG, arterial blood gas; A/C, assist-controlled ventilation; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; TV, tidal volume.

image

Regulation of Hemoglobin Level

Anemia is common during and after cardiac surgery as a result of both dilutional changes and bleeding. Although a hemoglobin transfusion threshold of 10 g% was once common, increasing evidence suggests that a threshold of 7 g% is reasonably safe.32 However, in the post-CPB period, patients with incomplete revascularization or with poor target vessels may require a higher transfusion threshold.32 As a result, blood transfusions should be individualized for each patient but certainly should be used to maintain a minimal hemoglobin level of 7 g%.

image

Management of Bleeding

Chest tube drainage should be checked every 15 minutes after ICU admission to assess a patient’s coagulation status. Although blood loss is commonly divided into two types, surgical or medical, determining the cause of bleeding is often difficult. When bleeding exceeds 400 mL/hr during the first hour, 200 mL/hr for each of the first 2 hours, or 100 mL/hr over the first 4 hours, returning to the OR for chest reexploration should be considered. The clinical situation must be individualized for each patient, however, and in the face of a known coagulopathy, more liberal blood loss before chest re-exploration may be acceptable. There are numerous medical causes for bleeding after cardiac surgery. Platelet dysfunction after cardiac surgery is common. The CPB circuit itself leads to contact activation and degranulation of platelets, resulting in their dysfunction. Residual heparinization is common postcardiac surgery and frequently occurs when either heparinized pump blood is transfused after CPB or insufficient protamine is administered. Fibrinolysis is also common after CPB, predominantly caused by a host of activated inflammatory and coagulation pathways. Coagulation factors may decrease from activation at air–blood interfaces or from dilution with the CPB pump-priming solution. Hypothermia also may aggravate the coagulation cascade and lead to further bleeding. Conventional coagulation tests are helpful to identify the coagulation abnormality contributing to the bleeding. Common laboratory testing includes activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio (INR), platelet count, fibrinogen level, and d-dimers. Unfortunately, most conventional measures take 20 to 40 minutes before results are available. This has led to the development of new methods to help guide treatment. These bedside point-of-care tests are providing more rapid, clinically relevant results compared with laboratory testing. The use of point-of-care testing such as thromboelastography has been demonstrated to reduce transfusion requirements without increasing blood loss and is commonly used, especially following difficult cardiac cases33,34 (see Chapters 17 and 28 to 31).

Initial medical treatment of excessive blood loss consists of 50 to 100 mg intravenous protamine to ensure complete heparin reversal. This may need to be repeated if heparinized CPB pump blood has been administered after protamine reversal. Although the reinfusion of chest tube blood was common to avoid exposure to donor packed red blood cells, it is no longer used routinely in practice because this blood is known to contain activated coagulation and inflammatory mediators that may predispose to an increased risk for infection.35

Fresh-frozen plasma usually is given in the setting of an increased INR (> 1.5). Platelet levels of less than 100,000/mm3 may warrant platelet transfusion, but caution must be exercised when considering this course. Platelet transfusions carry the greatest risk for transfusion-related complications of any blood component, typically sepsis from bacterial contamination. Platelets should be used only when platelet counts are low or the patient has a known platelet dysfunction, secondary to the use of acetylsalicylic acid, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, or clopidogrel.36 Certain physical measures should be instituted, including warming of the hypothermic patient. The benefit of positive end-expiratory pressure on postoperative bleeding is equivocal and likely has little benefit in the face of surgical bleeding or in patients who are coagulopathic.37,38 The use of antifibrinolytics after cardiac surgery is likely of little benefit because several randomized trials were unable to demonstrate the efficacy of antifibrinolytics used after surgery39,40 (Box 33-3).

Factor VIIa recently has become available and initially was introduced for treatment of hemophiliacs who present with bleeding. It was introduced in cardiac surgery as rescue therapy in patients with uncontrolled bleeding, usually in the presence of normal coagulation results and no surgical evidence of bleeding.41 Although frequently used in the OR before returning to the ICU, it is still given frequently in the ICU setting. Doses initially were in the range of 75 to 100 μg/kg, but concern over thrombotic complications has led to dosage reductions ranging down to as little as 17 μg/kg.4143

image

Electrolyte Management

Hypokalemia is common after cardiac surgery, especially if diuretics were given intraoperatively. Hypokalemia contributes to increased automaticity and may lead to ventricular arrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation. Treatment consists of potassium infusions (20 mEq potassium in 50 mL D5W infused over 1 hour) until the potassium exceeds 3.5 mEq/mL. In patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions caused by increased automaticity, 5.0 mEq/mL potassium may be desirable. Hypomagnesemia contributes to ventricular pre-excitation and may contribute to atrial fibrillation (AF). It is common in malnourished and sick patients, a frequent occurrence in the cardiac surgical setting. Management consists of intermittent boluses of magnesium—1 to 2 g over 15 minutes. Hypocalcemia also is frequent during cardiac surgery and may reduce cardiac contractility. Intermittent boluses of calcium chloride or calcium gluconate (1 g) may be required (Table 33-5).

TABLE 33-5 Common Electrolyte Abnormalities and Possible Treatment Options

Hypokalemia (K+ < 3.5 mmol/L)
SSx: muscle weakness, ST-segment depression, “u” wave, T-wave flat, ventricular pre-excitation
Rx: IV KCl at 10–20 mEq/hr via central catheter
Hyperkalemia (K+ > 5.2 mmol/L)
SSx: muscle weakness, peaked T wave, loss of P wave, prolonged PR/QRS
Rx: CaCl2 1 g, insulin/glucose, HCO3, diuretics, hyperventilation, dialysis
Hypocalcemia (ionized Ca2+ < 1.1 mmol/L)
SSx: hypotension, heart failure, prolonged QT interval
Rx: CaCl2 or Ca gluconate
Hypercalcemia (Ionized Ca2+ > 1.3 mmol/L)
SSx: altered mental state, coma, ileus
Rx: dialysis, diuretics, mithramycin, calcitonin
Hypermagnesemia (Mg2+ > 0.7 mmol/L)
SSx: weakness, absent reflexes
Rx: stop Mg infusion, diuresis
Hypomagnesemia (Mg2+ < 0.5 mmol/L)
SSx: arrhythmia, prolonged PR and QT intervals
Rx: Mg infusion 1 to 2 g

IV, intravenous; Rx, treatment; SSx, signs and symptoms.

image

Glucose Management

Diabetes is a common comorbidity (up to 30%) and is a known risk factor for adverse outcome in patients presenting for cardiac surgery.4446 Hyperglycemia itself is common during CPB. The risk factors for hyperglycemia include diabetes, administration of steroids before CPB, volume of glucose-containing solutions administered, and use of epinephrine infusions.47 Poor perioperative glucose control is associated with increases in mortality and morbidity, including an increased risk for infection and a prolonged duration of ventilation.4852 In a large prospective, randomized, controlled trial of tight glucose control (blood glucose levels of 4.1 to 6.5 mmol/L) during postoperative ICU stay, reductions in mortality were shown by the authors compared with more liberal glucose control (blood glucose levels of 12 mmol/L).52 This trial enrolled both diabetic and nondiabetic hyperglycemic patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery and demonstrated that tight management of glucose is beneficial in the CRA. However, another recent multicenter trial, as well as a meta-analysis of tight glucose control in the ICU, suggest an increase in harm, likely related to an increase in episodic hypoglycemia.53,54 Therefore, it may be prudent to accept a more liberal blood sugar level (< 10.0 mmol/L) to reduce hypoglycemic episodes.

image

Pain Control

Pain control after cardiac surgery has become a concern as narcotic doses have been reduced to facilitate fast-track protocols. Intravenous morphine is still the mainstay of treatment for postcardiac surgery patients. The most common approach is patient-demanded, nurse-delivered intravenous morphine, and this treatment remains popular because of 1:1 to 1:2 nursing typically provided during cardiac recovery. However, with a change to more flexible nurse coverage and, therefore, higher nurse-to-patient ratios, patient-controlled analgesia morphine is becoming increasingly popular. Several studies have examined patient-controlled analgesia morphine use in patients after cardiac surgery.5561 A meta-analysis looking at patient-controlled analgesia morphine for postoperative pain showed small incremental benefits. However, young patients, those who use narcotics before surgery or are transferred to a regular ward within 24 hours, may benefit from patient-controlled analgesia for pain management62 (Table 33-6; see Chapter 38).

TABLE 33-6 Pain Management Options after Cardiac Surgery

Patient-Controlled Analgesia
May be of benefit in a stepdown unit
Reduced 24-hour morphine consumption demonstrated in 2 of 7 randomized trials
Intrathecal Morphine
Doses studied: 500 μg to 4 mg
May be of benefit to reduce IV morphine use
May be of benefit in reducing VAS pain scores
*Potential for respiratory depression
Ideal dosing not ascertained; range, 250–400 μg
Thoracic Epidurals
Common dosages from literature
Ropivacaine 1% with 5 μg/mL fentanyl at 3–5 mL/hr
Bupivacaine 0.5% with 25 μg/mL morphine at 3–10 mL/hr
Bupivacaine 0.5% to 0.75% at 2–5 mL/hr
Reduced pain scores
Shorter duration of intubation
*Risk for epidural hematoma difficult to quantify
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs
Common dosages from literature
Indomethacin 50–100 mg PR BID
Diclofenac 50–75 mg PO/PR q8h
Ketorolac 10–30 mg IM/IV q8h
Reduces narcotic utilization
Many different drugs studied; difficult to determine superiority of a given agent
*May increase serious adverse events (one trial using cyclooxygenase-2–specific inhibitors)

BID, twice daily; IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; PO, orally; PR, rectally; VAS, visual analogue scale.

Regional Analgesia Techniques

Intrathecal Morphine

ITM has been investigated in randomized trials as an adjuvant for pain control in cardiac surgical patients, with doses ranging from 500 μg to 4 mg.6372 A meta-analysis of 17 randomized, controlled trials compared ITM with standard treatment. There was no difference in mortality, MI, or time to extubation. There were modest reductions in morphine use and pain scores, whereas the incidence of pruritus was increased.

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia

Thoracic epidural analgesia has gained some popularity as a method of providing intraoperative and postoperative pain control in cardiac surgery (see Table 33-6). The best evidence for benefit comes from a meta-analysis of 15 randomized, controlled trials.73 Thoracic epidural analgesia did not significantly affect the incidence of mortality or MI. It did significantly reduce arrhythmias, pulmonary complications, and time to tracheal extubation. All the randomized trials were performed in CABG patients. There were no reported complications as a result of epidural insertion, specifically epidural hematoma; however, all trials were inadequately powered to detect this complication. Attempts have been made to calculate the risk for epidural hematoma using available published series, with estimates of maximum risk ranging from 1:1000 to 1:3500 depending on the confidence limits chosen (99% vs. 95%).74 A large retrospective review reported no epidural hematomas in 727 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB receiving thoracic epidural analgesia the day of surgery (on entrance into the OR).75 At least 1 hour elapsed between the insertion of the epidural catheter and heparin administration. There were 9 failed catheter insertions and 4 failed analgesia blocks with 11 bloody taps in this study.75 Unfortunately, the population of cardiac surgical patients is increasingly on antiplatelet medication, such as clopidogrel or prasugrel, which increase the risk for epidural hematoma.76 The risk for epidural hematoma and the potential delay of surgery from a bloody tap have limited the widespread adoption of thoracic epidural analgesia for cardiac surgery, especially in the United States (see Chapter 38).

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs

The use of NSAIDs has gained popularity in a multimodal approach, allowing reductions in both pain levels and narcotic side effects (see Table 33-6). The conventional NSAIDs, which nonselectively block the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) isoenzyme, reduce inflammation, fever, and pain, and also block the COX-1 isoenzyme resulting in the side effects of gastrointestinal toxicity and platelet dysfunction.77 Numerous randomized trials have examined the benefit of NSAID use for postoperative pain control.61,7888 In addition, a meta-analysis looking at the benefit of NSAIDs in the setting of cardiac and thoracic surgery demonstrated reductions in narcotic consumption in patients given NSAIDs.89 Most patients were younger than 70 years and had no coexisting renal dysfunction. The NSAIDs used in this meta-analysis were nonselective COX inhibitors. Several trials have suggested increased adverse events, especially in patients with coronary artery disease, who receive the COX-2 selective NSAIDs both in the perioperative cardiac setting and in ambulatory patients. For this reason, COX-2 selective NSAIDs are no longer used in most cardiac centers.90 Therefore, although NSAIDs have theoretic side effects, the benefit in reduced narcotic consumption and improved visual analogue scale pain scores is well demonstrated; many centers continue to use nonselective NSAIDs as analgesia adjuvants in cardiac surgery.91 However, NSAIDs should be avoided in patients with renal insufficiency, a history of gastritis, or peptic ulcer disease. Adjuvant ranitidine treatment should be considered to prevent gastric irritation.

image

Medications for Risk Reduction after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

CABG surgery itself reduces the risk for mortality and angina recurrence, but several medical management issues may help maintain the long-term benefit after CABG surgery. Specifically, the use of aspirin, β-blockers, and lipid-lowering agents has been demonstrated to prolong survival or reduce graft restenosis, or both (Box 33-4).

Aspirin

Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) use on graft patency and reductions in MI and mortality after CABG surgery.9296 A large observational study showed a reduction in mortality of nearly 3% and a reduction in MI rate of 48% with the early use of aspirin after surgery (within 48 hours).96 Acetylsalicylic acid dosages have ranged from 100 mg once daily to 325 mg three times daily orally or by suppository up to 48 hours after ICU admission. There was no additional benefit from the use of aspirin before surgery.97 The beneficial effect on saphenous vein graft patency appears to be lost after 1 year, with prolonged use of aspirin having no further benefit.98 However, because aspirin, in dosages of 75 to 325 mg/day, reduces mortality and morbidity in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease, its continued long-term use is clearly warranted.99 Ticlopidine, clopidogrel, or prasugrel may be suitable alternatives in patients who are allergic to aspirin. Clopidogrel, through reductions in all-cause mortality, stroke, and MI, may be superior to acetylsalicylic acid in patients who return with recurrent ischemic events after cardiac surgery.100 Ticlopidine, however, should be used with caution because it may cause neutropenia (necessitating white blood cell counts to be monitored during initial use). Clopidogrel has a lower incidence of adverse reactions compared with ticlopidine and is, therefore, preferred as a second-line agent when aspirin is contraindicated.

β-Blockers

The use of β-blockers in patients after CABG surgery has not been shown to improve mortality.101 They also have failed to reduce myocardial ischemia rate, unlike the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, which have, in a single study, demonstrated efficacy at reducing ischemic events after CABG.102 However, patients who received β-blockers after perioperative MI had reductions in mortality at 1 year.103 Patients with a previous history of MI should be continued on β-blocker therapy.