170 Poisoning
Overview of Approaches for Evaluation and Treatment
Gastrointestinal Decontamination
The theory of gastric decontamination (GID) is that removal of toxins from the stomach (where absorption is poor) before they move into the small bowel (where absorption is more rapid) decreases the toxicity of the poisoning. Because of controversies regarding the role of gut decontamination, senior toxicologists from the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) agreed to collaborate on the production of Position Statements on GID treatments. These statements, published in 1997, are systematically developed guidelines founded on a criteria-based critical review of all relevant scientific literature.1 The Position Statements were updated in 2004. GID Position Statement summaries are presented in this chapter.
Ipecac
Ipecac is a prepared form of the Cephaelis acuminata or Cephaelis ipecacuanha plants. Vomiting within 30 minutes after administration is caused by local irritation of the gastric mucosa. Vomiting after 30 minutes is centrally induced.2
Position Statement
Syrup of ipecac should not be administered routinely for the management of poisoned patients. In experimental studies, the amount of marker removed by ipecac treatment was highly variable and diminished with time. There is no evidence from clinical studies that ipecac improves outcome for poisoned patients, and its routine administration should be abandoned.3
Gastric Lavage
For gastric lavage, a large-bore (36F-40F) orogastric tube is passed, after which small volumes (200-300 mL) of liquid are alternately administered and aspirated. Endotracheal intubation should precede this procedure in comatose patients. An oral airway prevents biting of the tube. The amount of stomach contents removed via this procedure is highly variable and decreases with time.4–6 The procedure can actually push stomach contents into the intestine.7 Contraindications include loss of protective airway reflexes (unless the patient is endotracheally intubated), ingestion of a corrosive substance or a hydrocarbon, gastrointestinal pathology, and other medical conditions that could be worsened by the use of lavage. Complications of the procedure include aspiration, laryngospasm, hypoxia, hypercapnia, mechanical injury, and fluid and electrolyte imbalances in children.8
Position Statement
Gastric lavage should not be employed routinely in the management of poisoned patients. It should not be considered unless the patient has ingested a potentially life-threatening amount of a poison and the procedure can be undertaken within 60 minutes after ingestion. Even then, clinical benefit has not been confirmed in controlled studies.8
Single-Dose Activated Charcoal
Activated charcoal is made when coconut shells, peat, wood, or other materials undergo controlled pyrolysis and are subsequently activated by heating in steam or air at high temperatures. Activation creates multiple internal pores and the small particle size necessary for adsorption. The particles have a large surface area and are capable of adsorbing poisons with varying affinities. Although in vitro studies demonstrate adsorption of many drugs to activated charcoal, animal studies reveal variable reductions in the systemic uptake of marker substances.9 Volunteer and clinical studies have not demonstrated that single-dose administration of activated charcoal improves outcome. Contraindications to the administration of activated charcoal include decreased level of consciousness and unprotected airway, ingestion of caustic substances or hydrocarbons, gastrointestinal pathology, and medical conditions that could be further compromised by the administration of activated charcoal. Complications include aspiration and direct administration of charcoal into the lung.10
Because activated charcoal is an inert substance, it is thought that lung injury after aspiration of activated charcoal is caused by gastric contents. Aspiration of gastric contents causes neutrophils to release neutrophil elastase, which increases pulmonary vascular permeability.11 In comparison, intratracheal administration of activated charcoal does not increase elastase in the bronchoalveolar fluid.12 Activated charcoal can activate alveolar macrophages, which are a potent source of oxygen radicals, proteases, and other inflammatory mediators. Charcoal also causes obstruction of small distal airways Overdistention of alveolar segments in areas not occluded by charcoal leads to volutrauma in those areas, which increases microvascular permeability.13 Although case reports reveal long-term pulmonary pathology after aspiration or instillation of activated charcoal,14,15 the true incidence of chronic problems after charcoal aspiration is unknown.
Position Statement
Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients. The effectiveness of charcoal decreases with time; the greatest benefit is obtained within the first hour after ingestion. Administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of poison (that is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) not longer than 1 hour before treatment. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves outcome.10,16
Whole-Bowel Irrigation
Whole-bowel irrigation consists of administration through a nasogastric tube of an osmotically balanced, polyethylene glycol–based electrolyte solution to decontaminate the entire gastrointestinal tract by physically expelling intraluminal contents. As much as 1500 to 2000 mL/h can be administered to an awake patient. Negotiations to let the patient attempt to drink the solution only cause delay, because patients are unable to drink at a constant rate. Contraindications include bowel pathology, unprotected or compromised airway, hemodynamic instability, and intractable vomiting. Complications are nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramps.18
Position Statement
Whole-bowel irrigation should not be used routinely in the poisoned patient. Whole-bowel irrigation should be considered for potentially toxic ingestions of sustained-release or enteric-coated drugs. There are insufficient data to support or exclude the use of whole-bowel irrigation for toxic ingestions of lithium, iron, lead, zinc, or packets of illicit drugs.18
Enhanced Elimination
Multiple-Dose Activated Charcoal
Multiple-dose activated charcoal is the repeated oral administration of activated charcoal to enhance drug elimination. If the drug concentration in the gut is lower than that in the blood, the drug will passively diffuse back into the gut. The concentration gradient, intestinal surface area, permeability, and blood flow determine the degree of passive diffusion. As the drug passes continuously into the gut, it is adsorbed onto the charcoal particles, a process called gastrointestinal dialysis. Multiple-dose activated charcoal also interrupts the enterohepatic and enterogastric circulation of drugs. Drugs with a prolonged elimination half-life, a small volume of distribution (less than 1 L/kg), and little protein binding are the most amenable to this sort of management.19
The initial dose of charcoal is 50 to 100 g, and this treatment is followed every 1, 2, or 4 hours by a dose equivalent to 12.5 g/h. More frequent, smaller doses may prevent vomiting. Addition of a cathartic (e.g., sorbitol) can be considered for the initial one or two doses. Continuous use of a cathartic can cause diarrhea and fluid and electrolyte imbalances. Multiple-dose activated charcoal can be continued until the patient improves clinically. Contraindications include an unprotected airway, intestinal obstruction, and an anatomically abnormal gastrointestinal tract. Complications include bowel obstruction and vomiting with subsequent aspiration.19
Position Statement
Multiple-dose activated charcoal should be considered if a patient has ingested a life-threatening amount of carbamazepine, dapsone, phenobarbital, quinine, or theophylline. With all of these drugs, data confirm enhanced elimination, although no controlled studies have demonstrated clinical benefit.19
Urinary Alkalinization
Urinary alkalinization is the administration of intravenous (IV) sodium bicarbonate to produce urine with a pH ≥ 7.5. The objective of treatment is pH manipulation, not forced diuresis. Hypokalemia is the most common complication. Alkalemia also can occur.20
Position Statement
Urinary alkalinization should be considered as first-line treatment in patients with moderately severe salicylate poisoning who do not meet the criteria for hemodialysis. Urinary alkalinization also should be considered for patients with severe poisoning due to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid or mecoprop (MCPP) poisoning. Urinary alkalinization is not recommended as first-line treatment for cases of phenobarbital poisoning, because multiple-dose activated charcoal is superior.20
Selected Antidotes
Dextrose
Up to 8% of patients with altered mental status are hypoglycemic.21 Hypoglycemia can be a result of drug or toxin exposure, nutritional deprivation, or a medical complication (e.g., sepsis, hyperthermia). Glucose should be checked at the bedside for all patients with altered mental status.
Naloxone
Endogenous and exogenous opiates produce their effects by binding at one or more opiate receptors. Naloxone, nalmefene, and naltrexone are competitive opioid antagonists that bind at the mu (µ), kappa (κ), and delta (δ) receptors and competitively prevent the binding of endogenous and exogenous opiates at these receptors. The duration of action of naloxone is 15 to 90 minutes. Its clinical effects depend on the dose and route of naloxone administration as well as the dose and rate of elimination of the opiate agonist. Naloxone can be administered by IV, intramuscular, intratracheal, or sublingual routes. After IV administration, naloxone rapidly enters the central nervous system (CNS). In patients with opiate poisoning, consciousness is restored and respiration improves within 1 to 2 minutes. Meiosis, inhibition of baroreceptor reflexes, laryngospasm, and decreased gastrointestinal motility are also reversed.22
If respiratory depression returns, the initial dose of naloxone may have to be repeated or a constant infusion of naloxone initiated. The starting dose for a constant infusion of naloxone is hourly administration of about one-half to two-thirds of the bolus dose that reversed the opiate effects. If withdrawal is precipitated, it is short lived and not life threatening. Complications of naloxone administration are very rare.23
Flumazenil
Flumazenil competitively antagonizes the pharmacologic effects of drugs that act on the benzodiazepine receptor (e.g., all drugs in the benzodiazepine class). Receptor occupancy follows the law of mass action, and antagonism is dose dependent. The duration of action of flumazenil is variable and depends on the type of benzodiazepine ingested, relative doses of agonist and antagonist, presence of ongoing benzodiazepine absorption, and relative receptor binding affinities. Flumazenil also antagonizes the sedative effects of drugs other than benzodiazepines, such as zolpidem (Ambien), cannabis, ethanol, promethazine, chlorzoxazone, and carisoprodol. These drugs may have differing affinities for the γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptor, implying that the dose of flumazenil required to reverse the effects depends on the affinity of the specific drug for the receptor.24
Flumazenil is safe and effective for reversing conscious sedation after short procedures such as endoscopy. This safety has been generalized to imply that flumazenil also is safe for patients with a multidrug overdose and that reversal of benzodiazepine-induced sedation prevents morbidity from procedures such as endotracheal intubation or computed tomography. However, many patients have experienced single or multiple seizures after flumazenil administration. Status epilepticus has been precipitated, leading to death. The data are insufficient to determine whether morbidity or mortality is increased as a result of flumazenil-precipitated seizures.25,26
Flumazenil administration can precipitate seizures in patients with an overdose who have ingested both a benzodiazepine and a pro-convulsant drug or just a pro-convulsant drug. Flumazenil also can precipitate seizures in patients who have a history of seizures, chronic benzodiazepine ingestion, or head injury. Identification of patients at risk for seizures is difficult.27 Before administering flumazenil to a patient with an ingestion, it is reasonable to first obtain an electrocardiogram (to rule out exposure to pro-convulsant tricyclic antidepressants) and a urine drug screen. Re-sedation occurs after 18 to 120 minutes in approximately half of patients awakened by flumazenil. Therefore, either continuous IV infusion or observation for a number of hours is required.28
Physostigmine
Physostigmine inhibits acetylcholinesterase, the enzyme responsible for the metabolism of acetylcholine (ACH). ACH is an endogenous neurotransmitter that mediates action by binding to muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Accumulation of ACH stimulates cholinergic nerve endings. In the poisoned patient, physostigmine is most frequently administered to treat anticholinergic toxicity. Clinical signs of anticholinergic toxicity are recognized by the mnemonic, “Blind as a bat, Red as a beet, Hot as a hare, Dry as a bone, Mad as a hatter.” Physostigmine administration should be considered if life-threatening clinical signs of anticholinergic peripheral effects (hypertension, tachycardia, and seizures) or central effects (painful psychosis) are present. However, it is extremely difficult to balance cholinergic and anticholinergic forces. Complications of cholinergic crises (caused by excessive doses of physostigmine) include hypertension, arrhythmia, asystole, bronchorrhea, bronchoconstriction, seizures, and status epilepticus. Contraindications to physostigmine administration include reactive airway disease, peripheral vascular disease, intestinal or bladder obstruction, and treatment with a depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent (e.g., succinylcholine). An acceptable dose of physostigmine is 2 mg IV over 10 minutes. This drug should be administered in the presence of a physician because of the potential for precipitation of life-threatening cholinergic effects.29
Hypotension in the Poisoned Patient
Glucagon
The cardiovascular effects of glucagon are mediated by myocardial glucagon receptors which are catecholamine independent. Stimulation activates adenylate cyclase, leading to increased intracellular levels of the second messenger, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). This cyclic nucleotide increases myocardial calcium uptake. Both the slope of phase zero of the action potential and the conduction velocity through the atrioventricular node are increased. Glucagon increases heart rate and stroke volume, thereby increasing cardiac output. After IV administration, augmented inotropy is seen within 1 to 3 minutes, with a peak effect in 5 to 7 minutes.30
Insulin and Glucose
Insulin improves contractility in anoxic rat hearts and improves cardiac index after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. During drug-induced shock, insulin shifts myocardial fatty acid oxidation to carbohydrate oxidation, which increases contractility, left ventricular pressure, and rate of change of developed pressure. Enhanced fatty acid oxidation, such as occurs after epinephrine administration, transiently increases contractility at the expense of increased myocardial oxygen consumption.31
Acute Renal Failure
In poisoned patients, acute renal failure (ARF) is most frequently the result of a decrease in extracellular fluid volume and renal hypoperfusion caused by drug- or chemical-induced vasodilation, drug-induced myocardial depression, or rhabdomyolysis. Attempts to prevent ARF are important because there is no specific therapy once ARF is established. Studies evaluating the efficacy of low-dose dopamine (0.5-3.0 mg/kg/min) in preventing ARF have not demonstrated any benefit, but the patient populations in these studies consisted of critically ill patients with established ARF or at high risk for developing ARF.32 The efficacy of administration of low-dose dopamine after periods of hypotension in poisoned patients who typically are younger and without chronic disease has not been evaluated. When dopamine is administered to normal human subjects, there is a dose-dependent increase in renal blood flow, sodium excretion, and glomerular filtration rate.33 Low-dose dopamine also limits adenosine triphosphate (ATP) utilization and oxygen requirements in nephron segments at risk for ischemia.34 Although there are no studies regarding the efficacy of low-dose dopamine in cases of drug-induced hypotension, one may consider administration in previously healthy poisoned patients who have adequate vascular volume and remain oliguric or anuric despite maximal diuretic therapy.
Seizures
Blood pH can be as low as 7.17 at 30 minutes and 7.20 at 60 minutes after resolution of a 30- to 60-second seizure.35 Acidosis decreases cardiac output, oxygen extraction, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and impairs myocardial contractility. If a patient has ingested a cardiotoxic drug (e.g., a tricyclic antidepressant) that causes significant myocardial depression, the consequences of acidosis can increase the toxicity of the drug. Ictal increases in plasma epinephrine levels can add to the potential risk for cardiac arrhythmias. Additionally, airway reflexes are inhibited postictally, which adds to the potential for aspiration.36
Key Points
Arnold TC, Willis BH, Xiao F. Aspiration of activated charcoal elicits an increase in lung microvascular permeability. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1999;37:9-16.
Bateman DN. Gastric decontamination—a view for the millennium. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999;16:84-86.
Clarke SFJ, Dargan PI, Jones AL. Naloxone in opioid poisoning: walking the tightrope. Emerg Med J. 2005;22:612-616.
Recommendations are made for naloxone administration in acute opiate intoxication and overdose.
Holger JS, Engebretsen KM, Obetz CL, et al. A comparison of vasopressin and glucagon in beta-blocker-induced toxicity. Clin Toxicol. 2006;44:45-51.
Marques I, Gomes E, de Oliveira J. Treatment of calcium channel blocker intoxication with insulin infusion: case report and literature review. Resuscitation. 2003;57:211-213.
Mathieu-Nolf M, Babe MA, Coquelle-Couplet V, et al. Flumazenil use in an emergency department: a survey. Clin Toxicol. 2001;39:15-20.
Merigian K, Glaho K. Single-dose oral activated charcoal in the treatment of the self-poisoned patient: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Am J Ther. 2002;9:301-308.
Orringer DE, Eustace JC, Wunsch CD, Gardner LB. Natural history of lactic acidosis after grand mal seizures. N Engl J Med. 1977;15:796-799.
Pond SM, Lewis-Driver DJ, Williams GM, et al. Gastric emptying in acute overdose: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Med J Aust. 1995;163:345-349.
Sauvadet A, Rohn T, Pecker F, et al. Arachidonic acid drives mini-glucagon action in cardiac cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:12437-12445.
1 American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. Position statements: ipecac syrup, gastric lavage, single-dose activated charcoal, cathartics, whole-bowel irrigation. Clin Toxicol. 1997;35(7):699-762.
2 Manno BR. Toxicology of ipecac: A review. Clin Toxicol. 1977;10:221-242.
3 Krenzelok EP, McGuigan M, Lheur P. Position statement: ipecac syrup. Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:699-709.
4 Kulig K, Bar-Or D, Cantrill SV, et al. Management of acutely poisoned patients without gastric emptying. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14:562-567.
5 Pond SM, Lewis-Driver DJ, Williams GM, et al. Gastric emptying in acute overdose: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Med J Aust. 1995;163:345-349.
6 Bateman DN. Gastric decontamination—a view for the millennium. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999;16:84-86.
7 Holger JS, Engebretsen KM, Obetz CL, et al. A comparison of vasopressin and glucagon in beta-blocker-induced toxicity. Clin Tox. 2006;44:45-51.
8 Vale JA. Position statement: Gastric lavage. Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:711-719.
9 Cooney DO. Activated Charcoal in Medicinal Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995.
10 Chyka PA, Seger DS. Position statement: Single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:721-741.
11 Folkesson HG, Matthay MA, Hebert CA, Boraddus VC. Acid aspiration-induced lung injury in rabbits is mediated by interleukin-8-dependent mechanisms. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:107-116.
12 Arnold TC, Willis BH, Xiao F. Aspiration of activated charcoal elicits an increase in lung microvascular permeability. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1999;37:9-16.
13 Folkesson HG, Matthay MA, Herbert C, et al. Acid aspiration-induced lung injury in rabbits is mediated by interleukin-7-dependent mechanisms. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:107-116.
14 Graff GR. Chronic lung disease after activated charcoal aspiration. Pediatrics. 2002;109:959-961.
15 Sabga E, Dick A, Lertzman M, Tennenbein M. Direct administration of charcoal into the lung and pleural cavity. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30:695-697.
16 Merigian K, Glaho K. Single-dose oral activated charcoal in the treatment of the self-poisoned patient: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Am J Ther. 2002;9:301-308.
17 Barceloux D, McGuigan M, Hartigan-Go K. Position statement: Cathartics. Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:743-752.
18 Tennenbein M. Position statement: Whole bowel irrigation. Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:753-762.
19 Vale JA, Krenzelok EP, Barceloux GD. Position statement and practice guidelines on the use of multidose activated charcoal in the treatment of acute poisoning. Clin Toxicol. 1999;37:731-751.
20 Proudfoot AT, Krenzelok EP, Brent AJ, Vale AJ. Does urine alkalinization increase salicylate elimination? Toxicol Rev. 2003;22:129-136.
21 Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, Votey SR, Luo JS. The empiric use of hypertonic dextrose in patient with altered mental status: A reappraisal. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:20-24.
22 Berkowitz BA. The relationship of pharmacokinetics to pharmacologic activity: Morphine, methadone and naloxone. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1976;1:219-230.
23 Marques I, Gomes E, de Oliveira J. Treatment of calcium channel blocker intoxication with insulin infusion: case report and literature review. Resuscitation. 2003;57:211-213.
24 Pharmacological antidotes. In: Flanagan RJ, Jones AL, editors. Antidotes. London: Taylor and Francis; 2001:167-219.
25 Breeheny FX. Reversal of midazolam sedation of flumazenil. Crit Care Med. 1991;20:736-739.
26 Haverkos GP, Disalvo RP, Imhoff TE. Fatal seizures after flumazenil administration in a patient with mixed overdose. Ann Pharmacother. 1994;28:1347-1348.
27 Mathieu-Nolf M, Babe MA, Coquelle-Couplet V, et al. Flumazenil use in an emergency department: A survey. Clin Toxicol. 2001;39:15-20.
28 Spivey WH, Roberts JR, Derlet RW. A clinical trial of escalating doses of flumazenil for reversal of suspected benzodiazepine overdose in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:1813-1821.
29 Beaver KM, Gavin TJ. Treatment of acute anticholinergic poisoning with physostigmine. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:505-507.
30 Sauvadet A, Rohn T, Pecker F, et al. Arachidonic acid drives mini-glucagon action in cardiac cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:12437-12445.
31 Clarke SFJ, Dargan PI, Jones AL. Naloxone in opioid poisoning: walking the tightrope. Emerg Med J. 2005;22:612-616.
32 Richer M, Robert S, Lebel M. Renal hemodynamics during norepinephrine and low-dose dopamine infusions in man. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1150-1156.
33 Goldberg LI. Cardiovascular and renal actions of dopamine: Potential clinical applications. Pharmacol Rev. 1972;24:1-29.
34 Baldwin L, Henderson A, Hickman P. Effect of postoperative dopamine on renal function after elective major vascular surgery. Am J Nephrol. 1994;120:744-747.
35 Orringer DE, Eustace JC, Wunsch CD, Gardner LB. Natural history of lactic acidosis after grand mal seizures. N Engl J Med. 1977;15:796-799.
36 Fisher DJ. Acidaemia reduces cardiac output and left ventricular contractility in conscious lambs. J Dev Physiol. 1986;8:23-31.