Pesticides and Herbicides

Published on 22/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1336 times

185 Pesticides and Herbicides

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) broadly defines a pesticide as any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest. These agents are typically further classified according to their chemical, physical, or biological class, or they may also be categorized as acting on either animal or insect pests or undesirable plants. In the context of intended use, the categories of insecticide, herbicide, or rodenticide are also commonly used and often useful for reviewing toxicity profiles of agents most likely to be encountered in critical care medicine.

image General Principles of Management

As with a variety of other toxic exposures, the general principles of management for many of the pesticides have changed in recent years. Most notably, these changes have related to gastric decontamination, but there also have been emerging controversies regarding the use of antidotes intended to aid in the treatment of pesticide poisonings, especially those cases involving organophosphate (OP) insecticides.

Methods of gastric decontamination that have been reexamined over the last decade include the use of gastric lavage, activated charcoal, syrup of ipecac, and whole-bowel irrigation.1 Ipecac largely has been abandoned for routine use in either the prehospital or hospital care setting.2,3 Its slow onset of action, incomplete return of toxin, and ability to cause emesis in an unconscious or seizing patient render it unacceptable in most cases in which gastric decontamination might be considered a therapeutic option. Furthermore, many of the pesticide products are liquid formulations with hydrocarbon solvents, and this fact further precludes the use of an emetic owing to the risk of aspiration.

Gastric lavage is still a preferred method of decontamination in those substantial ingestion exposures where patients present within 60 minutes of ingestion.4 Care must be taken to ensure that the patient’s airway is protected with a cuffed endotracheal tube. Lavage should be carried out using a large-bore tube with adequate aliquots of water or saline. Since recovery rates may be small, clinicians should evaluate the risk-to-benefit ratio of use for each patient.

Although single-dose administration of activated charcoal has become the empirical treatment of choice for most significant toxic ingestions, its use and ability to improve patient outcomes in pesticide poisoning has not been systematically studied or proven.5 Furthermore, unless it is administered within the first hour after exposure, even its theoretical benefit may be questioned. Still, potential benefit may warrant its early use, especially with extremely toxic substances such as paraquat and diquat or substantial ingestions of long-acting anticoagulant rodenticides.

Multiple-dose activated charcoal also has been a therapeutic intervention intended to decrease absorption of toxins but, more importantly, enhance elimination of toxins once absorbed. Despite promising results in cases involving selected toxins, there are no data to document effectiveness in poisoning cases involving pesticides.

For those patients in whom activated charcoal may offer potential therapeutic benefit, active bowel sounds must be present, and an appropriate dose must be determined. Adults typically receive 25 to 100 g of charcoal as a mixed aqueous slurry with or without sorbitol as an added cathartic. Children and infants should receive 25 to 50 g or 1 g/kg body weight. Although the addition of sorbitol or other cathartics to activated charcoal has been shown to enhance elimination of certain toxins, their ability to reduce bioavailability or improve patient outcomes after pesticide poisoning has not been demonstrated. Thus, use of a sorbitol-containing activated charcoal preparation is neither indicated nor contraindicated.

Whole-bowel irrigation (WBI) involving the use of large volumes of a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-containing isosmotic solution has also been anecdotally reported to produce positive results in the treatment of poisoning. It is purported to cleanse the gut of toxins by inducing liquid stooling. In dog models, it has been shown to increase the mean total body elimination of paraquat.6 There have been no systematic controlled clinical studies to demonstrate its effectiveness in humans, and side effects frequently complicate its use and can mask emerging toxin-induced side effects that can confuse the clinical picture.

As many pesticides have hydrocarbon diluents or vehicles, any method of gastric decontamination must be cautiously attempted in only those patients likely to receive the greatest benefit. Hydrocarbon aspiration remains a real concern, and attempts at most forms of gastric decontamination will likely increase the risk of aspiration by either direct or indirect means, including the induction of spontaneous emesis.

Skin decontamination in all substantial dermal exposures remains indicated and should be carried out concomitantly with other life-saving measures. Care should be taken to remove and discard contaminated clothing, consider and avoid contamination of emergency and healthcare personnel, and perform full decontamination of all exposed tissue with copious amounts of soap and water. Note that some agents such as the fungicide, chlorothalonil, or concentrated versions of the herbicide, glyphosate, are corrosive and in cases of ocular exposure may require extensive eye washing and evaluation by an ophthalmologist.

image Specific Agents

There are more than 3000 different formulations and 25,000 brand names of pesticides registered with the EPA.7 A brief list of those categories of agents most likely to be encountered in critical care medicine include the OPs, N-methyl carbamates, solid organochlorines, pyrethroids and pyrethrins, chlorophenoxy herbicides, paraquat, diquat, and a limited variety of commonly encountered agents with unique toxicology profiles.

Insecticides

Organophosphates

The primary toxicologic effects of OP insecticides relate to their ability to phosphorylate acetylcholinesterase (AChE), thereby forming an irreversible covalent phosphate linkage with a serine residue at the active site. This inhibition effectively allows unopposed action of acetylcholine at the nerve synapse, resulting in sustained depolarization of the postsynaptic neuron. This action occurs both in the central nervous system (CNS) and at muscarinic sites in the peripheral nervous system, nicotinic sites in the sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia, and nicotinic sites at the neuromuscular junction. Although OP insecticides registered by the EPA are relatively more selective in acting on insect cholinesterase, they also affect mammalian AChE in the event of excessive exposure.

The rate of spontaneous reactivation of AChE is dependent on the chemical structure of the agent involved. The most commonly encountered agents carry either two methyl or two ethyl ester groups attached to the phosphorus atom. The significance of this structural finding relates to the fact that poisoning with dimethyl agents (e.g., demeton-S-methyl, dichlorvos, dimethoate, or malathion) results in rapid and spontaneous reactivation of AChE, whereas poisoning with diethyl agents (e.g., chlorpyrifos, diazinon, or parathion) is associated with slower reactivation of AChE. The differences among the OP insecticides can create therapeutic dilemmas in determining appropriate courses of treatment.8

Patients acutely poisoned with OP insecticides present with a range of signs and symptoms, depending on the dose and potency of the agent involved. Significant poisoning exposures result in respiratory failure due to muscle weakness, excessive mucous secretion, and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, which may be an immediate cause of death. Severe poisoning also can cause neurologic effects including seizures, coma, or delirium, which result from cholinergic input in the midbrain and medulla. Dystonias, choreoathetoid movements, and fasciculations also can be noted.

Varieties of arrhythmias have been reported, including tachyarrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias, and torsades de pointes ventricular tachycardia. Diarrhea and vomiting are almost universally seen in severe poisoning, along with excessive secretions of tears, saliva, and sweat. This constellation of symptoms has given rise to a number of mnemonics to describe the cholinergic excesses, such as DUMBELS (diarrhea, urination, miosis, bronchospasm, emesis, lacrimation, salivation) and SLUDGE (salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, emesis).

An intermediate syndrome or type II toxicity also has been described. In this syndrome, patients exhibit paralysis of proximal limb muscles, neck flexor muscles, motor cranial nerves, and respiratory muscles, without significant muscarinic symptoms. These effects are noted 24 to 96 hours after initial signs and symptoms and are thought by some to be a result of initial underdosing with the antidote.912

Some OPs such as the triaryl phosphates can produce a delayed peripheral neuropathy known as organophosphate-induced delayed neuropathy (OPIDN), which manifests 2 to 3 weeks after a single acute poisoning. After abatement of acute cholinergic effects and symptoms associated with the intermediate syndrome (see later), patients with OPIDN develop signs and symptoms including tingling of the extremities, sensory loss, progressive muscle weakness and flaccidity of the distal skeletal muscles of the lower and upper extremities, and ataxia. The mechanisms leading to OPIDN are not fully understood and may not be directly related to inhibition of AChE, since some of the agents involved are poor AChE inhibitors.1315

Diagnosis of OP poisoning typically requires a clinical picture of cholinergic symptoms, onset of symptoms within 12 hours of exposure, a 50% or more reduction of plasma and red blood cell (RBC) cholinesterase below baseline, and clinical improvement of muscarinic signs and symptoms with the administration of atropine.

The most severe cases of poisoning can be rapidly fatal if not aggressively treated. Atropine is the mainstay of treatment, and in some cases extremely large doses (>100 mg/d) may be required to reverse muscarinic symptoms. Critical care clinicians often will be faced with the decision to administer an oxime such as pralidoxime (2-PAM), which regenerates AChE by reversing phosphorylation of the active site on the enzyme before the phosphorylated AChE has undergone aging. Although animal data consistently have shown a positive effect of oxime therapy, a number of authors have questioned their utility, and reviews of the clinical effectiveness of oxime therapy have produced mixed results.16,17 Still other work has demonstrated a more convincing benefit associated with the use of 2-PAM and provides a rationale for appropriate dosing that includes continuous pralidoxime infusion, as compared to repeated bolus injection.18 Although various studies have lead the World Health Organization to recommend standard doses of 2-PAM, including an intravenous (IV) bolus of 30 mg/kg as a loading dose followed by infusion of at least 8 mg/kg/h, a modified administration schedule of a 2-g IV bolus dose followed by a continuous infusion of 1 g over an hour for 48 hours demonstrated reduction in both morbidity and mortality of moderately severe cases of acute OP poisoning.18,1921

As such, 2-PAM administration is warranted in moderate to severe poisoning in patients with respiratory compromise, seizures, or coma. Furthermore, 2-PAM is typically used in combination with atropine, as atropine blocks only the effects of acetylcholine at the postsynaptic neuron but does not regenerate AChE.

Animal studies suggest that other new treatment approaches such as alkalinization hold promise in the effective management of OP intoxication, but there is insufficient evidence supporting their role in the routine care of these patients.22,23 If the patient receives appropriate treatment and survives the first few hours, prognosis is good, even in severe cases of poisoning.

N-Methyl Carbamates

Carbamate insecticides are derivatives of N-methyl carbamic acid and share similar toxicologic effects with OP insecticides in that both inhibit AChE. These insecticides differ from the OPs in that they cause a reversible carbamylation of the AChE enzyme. This carbamyl-AChE combination dissociates more readily than the OP phosphoryl-AChE complex, resulting in a shorter duration of clinical effects, a wider range between doses causing clinical effects and fatality, and diminished usefulness of blood cholinesterase measurements.

In cases of serious poisoning, patients demonstrate CNS depression with coma, seizures, and hypotonicity. Nicotinic effects including hypertension and cardiorespiratory depression are also common. Respiratory effects such as dyspnea, bronchospasm, bronchorrhea, and pulmonary edema are also likely to be present.24

As in severe cases of OP poisoning, treatment should be based on a high index of suspicion or history suggestive of either OP or carbamate exposure and presence of characteristic symptomatology and should not be delayed pending confirmation by blood cholinesterase testing. Although clinical presentation is quite similar to OP intoxication, seizures as a presenting symptom are uncommon because many carbamates do not cross the blood-brain barrier.

Cholinesterase testing may be of more limited value in carbamate poisoning, depending on the timing of sampling; in vitro regeneration of AChE may render the results unreliable in confirming exposure.25,26

Initial treatment of choice is atropine, and as in severe cases of OP poisoning, large doses may be required to reverse symptoms of cholinergic crisis. Although pralidoxime has been suggested to be relatively contraindicated in cases of carbamate poisoning and may serve as an additional competitive inhibitor of AChE, the risk of adverse effects is small in comparison to potential benefit when faced with poisoning from an unknown cholinesterase inhibitor.

Prognosis in cases of carbamate poisoning is typically excellent when treatment is prompt and appropriate, with most cholinergic symptoms resolving within 24 hours. Contrary to OP poisoning, delayed or prolonged symptoms are not expected.

Solid Organochlorines

The use of solid organochlorine compounds as insecticides has been sharply curtailed worldwide in recent years, and almost all EPA registrations for compounds such as aldrin, dieldrin, benzene hexachloride, chlordane, and DDT have been cancelled. The EPA is currently banning endosulfan, leaving dicofol as essentially the last organochlorine compound that is a restricted-use insecticide. Lindane was banned by the EPA for use as a pesticide in 1996 but remains on the market under FDA jurisdiction as a second-line therapy for scabies. Still, a variety of agents remain in other international markets. Although poisoning from banned toxic agents is less likely, occasionally exposures to some residual products occur.

Cases of mild acute poisoning often result in CNS effects including headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, incoordination, tremor, and mental confusion. Even in more severe cases of poisoning, neurologic toxicity predominates, with myoclonic jerking progressing to generalized seizures, including status epilepticus.27,28 Symptoms may progress to coma and respiratory depression, and cardiac irritability may result in arrhythmias.

Confirmation of poisoning is more likely to be made from a strong history of exposure, since laboratory analysis is not routinely available and difficult to interpret. Although severe cases of exposures may demonstrate correspondingly high blood levels, measurable low levels do not necessarily confirm poisoning.

Treatment of severe poisoning is aimed at controlling convulsions and monitoring for respiratory compromise. Atropine, epinephrine, and other adrenergic amines in standard Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) protocols should be used only if absolutely necessary, as enhanced myocardial irritability predisposes to ventricular fibrillation. Despite the fact that serious and life-threatening effects can occur, especially in instances of intentional ingestion, advances in critical care medicine have significantly reduced the mortality in those patients receiving early and well-managed supportive care.

Pyrethrin/Pyrethroid

Pyrethrins (e.g., jasmolin, cinerin, pyrethrin) are naturally occurring esters of chrysanthemic and pyrethric acid, extracts of the Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium flower. Pyrethroids (e.g., allethrin, bifenthrin, bioresmethrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate, permethrin, phenothrin, resmethrin, tetramethrin) are synthetic pyrethrins which have been chemically modified to increase stability in the natural environment. A variety of different types of formulations are used for the control of insects on animals, in the house and garden, and in agriculture. Pyrethroids and pyrethrins interact with sodium channels in peripheral and central nerve cells to prolong the increase in permeability during the action potential excitatory phase of impulse transmission, resulting in failure of the cell to depolarize. In humans, rapid cleavage of the acid/alcohol ester along with oxidation to nontoxic metabolites limits toxicity. Pyrethrins and pyrethroids in their diluted form are poorly absorbed across intact skin and rarely result in toxicity. Despite limited absorption, an additional reason for low toxicity relates to rapid biodegradation by mammalian liver enzymes (ester hydrolysis and oxidation). Pyrethroids are differentiated by the absence (type I) or presence (type II) of an α-cyano group. Type I pyrethroids cause a tremor syndrome, and type II agents demonstrate a choreoathetosis/salivation syndrome.29 Most human case reports of toxicity involve type II agents. Despite extensive use and frequent exposure, a review of national poison center data revealed that moderate or major adverse effects were relatively rare based on review of 3 consecutive years of data (717 moderate and 23 major outcomes out of 17,873 exposures reported to poison centers nationwide).30

Unless significant ingestion of more concentrated type II products occurs, serious toxicity is unlikely. In those few significant exposures, patients must be monitored for the development of neurotoxic effects such as seizures.

Herbicides

Paraquat

Paraquat and diquat are nonselective dipyridyl contact herbicides. Paraquat is a restricted-use herbicide for most applications, although dilute solutions of 0.276% are available to consumers for spot weed killing. Of all registered herbicides, paraquat exposures are the most serious and potentially life threatening and affect the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, liver, heart, lungs, and other organs. Ingestion of as little as 10 to 15 mL of a 20% solution is life threatening. Although inhalation toxicity is rare, ingestions result in systemic toxicity, with the lung being the target organ. Both type I and II pneumocytes appear to accumulate paraquat, where biotransformation results in the formation of free radicals, lipid peroxidation, and cell death.3335 Concentrated paraquat is also quite corrosive, and prolonged contact may result in erythema, blistering, abrasion, and ulceration.36,37 Although absorption across intact skin is slow, once the skin is abraded, eroded, or otherwise damaged, much greater absorption can occur.

Ingestions of more concentrated paraquat solutions produce swelling, edema, and painful ulceration of the oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, stomach, and intestine. Liver injury may be evident from centrizonal hepatocellular injury, with corresponding elevations of circulating concentrations of the enzymes aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Kidney damage is often seen, and evidence of early damage may suggest a grave prognosis, because impaired renal function decreases clearance of paraquat from the body.

Acute poisoning can result in severe pulmonary edema within hours of ingestion, although delayed toxicity, manifested as pulmonary fibrosis, typically results in death 7 to 10 days after exposure. Toxic concentrations of paraquat can accumulate in the lung within hours of exposure, which limits the utility of various methods of decontamination or enhanced elimination. Rough estimates of toxicity suggest that ingestions of less than 20 mg/kg body weight of paraquat typically result in recovery, while ingestions of more than 40 mg/kg body weight result in 100% mortality within 1 to 7 days.37

Treatment including gastric decontamination largely has been ineffective, but theoretically, gastric lavage immediately after ingestion may be beneficial; even small returns of the substance may reduce total body burden. Administration of oral adsorbents has been recommended, but there is no conclusive evidence of value. As with gastric lavage, preventing absorption of even small quantities of paraquat may be useful. Agents that are typically recommended include activated charcoal, Robinson’s Bentonite, or Robinson’s Fuller Earth (adult dose for each is 100-150 g; dose for children is 2 g/kg) via NG tube, with or without a cathartic. In most Western medical facilities, only activated charcoal will be on hand and available for rapid administration.

Diagnosis of paraquat poisoning should be confirmed through qualitative analysis of paraquat in urine, with subsequent quantitative analysis in plasma. Manufacturers of paraquat may be able to aid in obtaining analysis of biological fluids for the presence of paraquat and interpreting results consistent with reported nomograms such as the one provided by Hart et al.38 Quantitative analysis of plasma concentrations within the first 24 hours can provide an accurate assessment of survival rates. Plasma concentrations in excess of 3 mg/L, regardless of time taken, have been associated with universally fatal outcomes despite aggressive interventions including hemodialysis.

Other treatment considerations focus on organs most likely to be affected, such as the pulmonary and renal systems. Because the presence of oxygen increases free radical formation, use of supplemental oxygen should be restricted if possible.39,40 Patients should be closely monitored for development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and impending respiratory failure. Varieties of other measures have been employed to increase elimination of paraquat. Although both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis have been used, peritoneal dialysis is largely ineffective compared to hemodialysis. Data regarding the benefits of dialysis are still inconclusive. Hemoperfusion for several consecutive days has been the most effective means of paraquat removal, and if used should be started within 24 hours—preferably within 12 hours—of ingestion. Although various antioxidants and free radical scavengers have been postulated to reduce free radical damage, no benefits have been demonstrated in animal studies.

One case reported the use of deferoxamine (100 mg/kg in 24 hours) and continuous infusion of N-acetylcysteine (300 mg/kg/d for 3 weeks) to treat an ingestion of 50 to 60 mL of a 20% solution of paraquat in an adult male.41 The patient survived without major sequelae. In another case, a 52-year-old male who ingested approximately 50 mL of a solution containing 13% paraquat and 7% diquat subsequently developed ARDS and pulmonary fibrosis. Survival prediction for the corresponding paraquat plasma levels was 30%. Treatment included oral Fuller’s earth, forced diuresis, hemofiltration, N-acetylcysteine, methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, vitamin E, colchicine, and delayed continuous nitric oxide inhalation. The patient recovered with subsequently normal pulmonary function. The authors were unsure which of the above interventions accounted for the successful outcome, but they were encouraged with the use of nitric oxide.42 Further data supporting the effectiveness of these modalities are lacking. Ultimately, there is no effective antidote.

Annotated References

Pawar KS, Bhoite RR, Pillay CP, Chavan SC, Malshikare DS, Garad SG. Continuous pralidoxime infusion versus repeated bolus injection to treat organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368:2136-2141.

This landmark study addressed the question of both the safety and efficacy of pralidoxime in the treatment of moderately severe poisoning with organophosphorus compounds. In addition to establishing an effective dose and method of administration, the study demonstrated that compared to existing standardized empirical dosing regimens, a high-dose infusion resulted in both decreased morbidity and mortality. Previous to this study, the overall effectiveness of pralidoxime had been debated, since various presumed appropriate dosing models had produced equivocal results. Although challenges related to funding the cost associated with administering the higher-dose regimen remain, its overall effectiveness appears to be less controversial.

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. Poison treatment in the home. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. Pediatrics. 2003;112:1182-1185.

The AAP states that ipecac should no longer be used routinely as a home treatment strategy for child poisoning and that existing ipecac in the home should be disposed of safety. Recently there has been interest regarding activated charcoal in the home as a poison treatment strategy. After reviewing the evidence, AAP believes that it is premature to recommend the administration of activated charcoal in the home. The first action for a caregiver of a child who may have ingested a toxic substance is to consult the local poison control center. Considering contraindications to ipecac use in poisonings involving pesticides and herbicides, critical care practitioners should be alert to identifying potential prehospital misuse of these decontamination modalities that may otherwise complicate treatment of the pediatric patient.

Bond GR. Home syrup of ipecac use does not reduce emergency department use or improve outcome. Pediatrics. 2003;112:1061-1064.

The usefulness of syrup of ipecac as a home treatment for poisoning and the need to keep it in the home has been increasingly challenged. This study suggests there is no reduction in resource utilization or improvement in patient outcome from the use of syrup of ipecac at home. Although these data cannot exclude a benefit in a very limited set of poisonings, any benefit remains to be proven. This report, coupled with the fact that there are obvious contraindications to using emetics in cases of pesticide or herbicide poisoning, underscores their lack of benefit in this type of poison exposure.

References

1 Krenzelok EP, Vale JA. Gastrointestinal Decontamination. In: Brent J, Wallace KL, Burkhart KK, Phillips SD, Donovan JW, editors. Critical Care Toxicology: diagnosis and management of the critically poisoned patient. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005:53-60.

2 Bond GR. Home syrup of ipecac use does not reduce emergency department use or improve outcome. Pediatrics. 2003 Nov;112(5):1061-1064.

3 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. Poison treatment in the home. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. Pediatrics. 2003 Nov;112(5):1182-1185.

4 Vale JA. Position statement: gastric lavage. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35(7):711-719. Review

5 Chyka PA, Seger D. Position statement: single-dose activated charcoal. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:721-741.

6 Mizutani T. Efficacy of whole bowel irrigation using solutions with or without adsorbent in the removal of paraquat in dogs. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1992;11:495-504.

7 Hayes WJJr. Introduction. In: Hayes WJJr, Laws ER, editors. Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1991:1.

8 Costa LG. Toxic effects of pesticides. In Klassen CD, editor: Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 7th ed, McGraw-Hill, 2008. Chapter 22 Organophosphorus Compounds

9 Senanayake N, Karalliedde L. Neurotoxic effects of organophosphorus insecticides. An intermediate syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1987 Mar 26;316(13):761-763.

10 De Bleecker JL. The intermediate syndrome in organophosphate poisoning: an overview of experimental and clinical observations. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1995;33(6):683-686.

11 De Bleecker J, Willems J, Van Den Neucker K, De Reuck J, Vogelaers D. Prolonged toxicity with intermediate syndrome after combined parathion and methyl parathion poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1992;30(3):333-345. discussion 347-9. Erratum in: J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1992;30(4):697

12 De Bleecker J, Van Den Neucker K, Willems J. The intermediate syndrome in organophosphate poisoning: presentation of a case and review of the literature. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1992;30(3):321-329. discussion 331-2. Review. Erratum in: J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1992;30(4):697

13 Abou-Donia MB, Lapadula DM. Mechanisms of organophosphorus ester-induced delayed neurotoxicity: type I and type II. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1990;30:405-440. Review

14 Baron RL, editor. Pesticide-Induced Delayed Neurotoxicity: Proceedings of a Conference. February 19-20, 1976 EPA –600/1-76-025

15 Lotti M, Moretto A. Organophosphate-induced delayed polyneuropathy. Toxicol Rev. 2005;24:37-49.

16 de Silva HJ, Wijewickrema R, Senanayake N. Does pralidoxime affect outcome of management in acute organophosphorus poisoning? Lancet. 1992;339:1136-1138.

17 Peter JV, Moran JL, Graham P. Oxime therapy and outcomes in human organophosphate poisoning: An evaluation using meta-analytic techniques. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:502-510.

18 Pawar KS, Bhoite RR, Pillay CP, Chavan SC, Malshikare DS, Garad SG. Continuous pralidoxime infusion versus repeated bolus injection to treat organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368:2136-2141.

19 Eyer P. The role of oximes in the management of organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. Toxicol Rev. 2003;22:165-190.

20 Johnson MK, Vale JA, Marrs TC, Meredith TJ. Pralidoxime for organophosphorus poisoning. Lancet. 1992;340:64.

21 Johnson MK, Jacobsen D, Meredith TJ, et al. Evaluation of antidotes for poisoning by organophosphorus pesticides. Emerg Med. 2000;12:22-37.

22 Balai-Mood M, Ayati MH, Ali-Akbarian H. Effect of high doses of sodium bicarbonate in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. Clin Toxicol. 2005;43(6):571-574.

23 Roberts M. Buckley NA: Alkalinisation for organophosphorus pesticide poisoning: A review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD004897

24 Lifshitz M, Shahak E, Bolotin A, Sofer S. Carbamate poisoning in early childhood and in adults. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35(1):25-27.

25 Rotenberg M, Almog S. Evaluation of the decarbamylation process of cholinesterase during assay of enzyme activity. Clin Chim Acta. 1995 Sep 15;240(2):107-116.

26 Jokanovic M, Maksimovic M. Abnormal cholinesterase activity: understanding and interpretation. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1997 Jan;35(1):11-16. Review

27 Hayes WJ. Chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides. In: Hayes WJ, editor. Pesticides Studied in Man. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1982:172.

28 Moses V, Peter JV. Acute intentional toxicity: endosulfan and other organochlorines. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48:539-544.

29 Ray DE, Forshaw PJ. Pyrethroid insecticides: poisoning syndromes, synergies, and therapy. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2000;38(2):95-101.

30 Osimitz TG, Sommers N, Kingston R. Human exposure to insecticide products containing pyrethrins and piperonyl butoxide (2001-2003). Food Chem Toxicol. 2009;47:1406-1415.

31 Prescott LF, Park J, Darrien I. Treatment of severe 2,4,D and mecoprop intoxication with alkaline diuresis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;7:11.

32 Park J, Darrien I, Prescott LF. Pharmacokinetic studies in severe intoxication with 2,4,-D and mecoprop. Proc Eur Soc Toxicol. 1977;18:154-155.

33 Pond SM. Manifestations and management of parquet poisoning. Med J Aust. 1990;152:256-259.

34 Giulivi C, Lavagno CC, Lucesoli F, Bermudez MJ, Boveris A. Lung damage in paraquat poisoning and hyperbaric oxygen exposure: superoxide-mediated inhibition of phospholipase A2. Free Radic Biol Med. 1995 Feb;18(2):203-213.

35 Nordquist RE, Nguyen H, Poyer JL, Carubelli R. The role of free radicals in paraquat-induced corneal lesions. Free Radic Res. 1995 Jul;23(1):61-71. Erratum in: Free Radic Res 1995 Nov;23(5):513

36 Tungsanga K, Chusilp S, Israsena S, Sitprija V. Paraquat poisoning: evidence of systemic toxicity after dermal exposure. Postgrad Med J. 1983 May;59(691):338-339.

37 Vale JA, Meredith TJ, Buckley BM. Paraquat poisoning: clinical features and immediate general management. Hum Toxicol. 1987 Jan;6(1):41-47. Review

38 Hart TB, Nevitt A, Whitehead A. A statistical approach to the prognostic significance of plasma paraquat concentrations. Lancet. 1984;2:1222.

39 Rhodes ML, Zavala DC, Brown D. Hypoxic protection in paraquat poisoning. Lab Invest. 1976 Nov;35(5):496-500.

40 Keeling PL, Pratt IS, Aldridge WN, Smith LL. The enhancement of paraquat toxicity in rats by 85% oxygen: lethality and cell-specific lung damage. Br J Exp Pathol. 1981 Dec;62(6):643-654.

41 Lheureux P, Leduc D, Vanbinst R, Askenasi R. Survival in a case of massive paraquat ingestion. Chest. 1995 Jan;107(1):285-289.

42 Eisenman A, Armali Z, Raikhlin-Eisenkraft B, Bentur L, Bentur Y, Guralnik L, et al. Nitric oxide inhalation for paraquat-induced lung injury. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1998;36(6):575-584.

43 Lam HF, Takezawa J, Gupta BN, van Stee EW. A comparison of the effects of paraquat and diquat on lung compliance, lung volumes and single breath diffusing capacity in the rat. Toxicology. 1980;18(2):111-123.

44 Vanholder R, Colardyn F, De Reuck J, Praet M, Lameire N, Ringoir S. Diquat intoxication: report of two cases and review of the literature. Am J Med. 1981 Jun;70(6):1267-1271. Review

45 Stancliffe TC, Pirie A. The production of superoxide radicals in reactions of the herbicide diquat. FEBS Lett. 1971 Oct 1;17(2):297-299.

46 Clark DG, Hurst EW. The toxicity of diquat. Br J Ind Med. 1970 Jan;27(1):51-55.