Periumbilical Perforator Sparing Components Separation

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1502 times

Chapter 9 Periumbilical Perforator Sparing Components Separation image

1 Clinical Anatomy

1 Rationale for Sparing the Periumbilical Perforators

3 Blood Supply to the Abdominal Wall Skin

2 Preoperative Considerations

2 Defining the Defect and Patient Anatomy

3 Choosing the Type of Components Separation

image The conventional components separation (as described in Chapter 8) requires significant skin undermining and division of the periumbilical perforators and should be performed only if extensive subcutaneous skin flap elevation is necessary (i.e., as done during removal of an infected onlay synthetic mesh). Otherwise a periumbilical perforator sparing technique, performed open or laparoscopic should be attempted in all cases requiring components separation.

3 Operative Steps

4 Exposure

image The old scar and subcutaneous tissue posterior to the scar is excised. This is performed usually en bloc with the ventral hernia sac (Fig. 9-5, A). Care is taken during dissection of the ventral hernia sac not to undermine too widely from the sac in order to avoid injury to the periumbilical perforators. Once the dissection is completed to the edge of the fascial defect, the hernia sac is opened and excised (Fig. 9-5, B).

6 Assessment of Fascial Approximation and Tension

image Assessment of fascial approximation is performed by placement of two or three Kocher clamps on each medial fascial edge (Fig. 9-5, C). If the fasciae can be easily approximated with minimal or physiologic tension then a components separation is not required. If the fascial edges do not approximate easily, then a components separation should be performed.

12 Mesh Placement

image Before fascial closure, a drain should be placed anterior to the mesh to minimize the incidence of subfascial fluid accumulation (see Figs. 9-12 and 9-13, A). This fluid could otherwise be a source of postoperative discomfort or infection, and it can be a barrier preventing apposition of the mesh to the rectus muscle, thereby preventing early fibroblast and vascular ingrowth and incorporation.
image A “double lay” mesh placement, combining both an underlay and onlay mesh, can be performed in cases of biologic matrix implantation in an attempt to minimize the chance of hernia recurrence (Fig. 9-14). A 4- to 6-cm wide segment of mesh is cut from the lateral side of the original piece. The underlay component is sutured in with at least a 5- to 7-cm underlayment; a drain is placed anterior to the underlay mesh, and the fascia is closed primarily over the drain. The onlay mesh piece is “pie-crusted” before implantation to avoid seroma entrapment between the anterior rectus sheath and the onlay mesh. The onlay portion of the double lay matrix may need to be “hour-glassed” at the level of the periumbilical perforators in order to preserve them. The onlay mesh can be sutured along its perimeter with a running long-lasting absorbable or permanent suture.

13 Midline Fascial Closure

image Midline fascial closure is performed following completion of the underlay mesh placement (see Fig. 9-13, B). If the fasciae approximate with some tension, an interrupted figure of eight closure is used. This can be performed from the top down and from the bottom up until the point of maximal tension is closed. If the fascial edges approximate easily, a running closure can be performed.

5 Pearls/Pitfalls

1 Managing the Reoperative Patient

Selected References

Agnew S.P., Small W.Jr., Wang E., Smith L.J., Hadad I., Dumanian G.A. Prospective measurements of intra-abdominal volume and pulmonary function after repair of massive ventral hernias with the components separation technique. Ann Surg. 2010;25(5):981-988.

Ceydeli A., Rucinski J., Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: An evidence based review of the literature. Curr Surg. 2005;62:220-225.

Dunne J.R., Malone D.L., Tracy J.K., Napolitano L.M. Abdominal wall hernias: risk factors for infection and resource utilization. J Surg Res. 2003;111:78-84.

El-Mrakby H.H., Milner R.H. The vascular anatomy of the lower anterior abdominal wall: a microdissection study on the deep inferior epigastric vessels and the perforator branches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(2):539-543. discussion 544-7

Finan K.R., Vick C.C., Kiefe C.L., Neumayer L., Hawn M.T. Predictors of wound infection in ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2005;190:676-681.

Huger W.E.Jr. The anatomical rationale for abdominal lipectomy. Am Surg. 1979;45:612.

Ramirez O.M., Ruas E., Dellon L. Component separation method for closure of abdominal wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:519-526.

Kolker A.R., Brown D.J., Redstone J.S., Scarpinato V.M., Wallack M.K. Multilayer reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with acellular dermal allograft and component separation. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:36-42.

Reid R.R., Dumanian G.A. Panniculectomy and the Separation-of-Parts Hernia Repair: A Solution for the Large Infraumbilical Hernia in the Obese Patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1006-1012.

Rosen M.J., Williams C., Jin J., McGee M.F., Schomisch S., Marks J., Ponsky J. Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model. Am J of Surg. 2007;194(3):385-389.

Saulis A.S., Dumanian G.A. Periumbilical rectus abdominis perforator preservation significantly reduces superficial wound complications in ‘separation of parts’ hernia repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2275-2280.

Shestak K.C., Edington H.J., Johnson R.R. The separation of anatomic components technique for the reconstruction of massive midline abdominal wall defects: anatomy, surgical technique, applications, and limitations revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:731-738.

Taylor G.I., Palmer J.H. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:113.

The Ventral Hernia Working Group, Breuing K., Bulter C.E., Ferzoco S., Franz M., Hultman C.S., Kilbridge J.F., Rosen M., Silverman R.P., Vargo D. Incisional ventral hernias: Review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010. epub