Percutaneous Sacroplasty

Published on 10/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurosurgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1856 times

Chapter 20 Percutaneous Sacroplasty

Sacral insufficiency fractures, which are commonly associated with osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and radiation therapy–related cancer bony metastasis, can be treated with percutaneous sacroplasty under fluoroscopic and CT guidance; procedure is the same in the vertebrae as in the sacrum [1]. Pain caused by sacral insufficiency fractures can be relieved immediately with percutaneous sacroplasty, and patients can be allowed to ambulate immediately after the procedure.

The possible mechanisms for the pain relief experienced after sacroplasty are as follows:

Procedure

Related anatomy and physiology

Figure 20-9 illustrates the anatomy and physiology related to sacroplasty.

Caveat

It is helpful to inject contrast medium or to place the needles into the foramen near the dorsal ganglion of S1 and/or S2 through the posterior approach before performing percutaneous sacroplasty, especially when the procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance.

CASE STUDY 20.1

A 38-year-old woman with breast cancer was suffering from intractable low back pain, especially in weight-bearing positions. There were tumor infiltrations on the L5 vertebra and both sacral alae of the S1 and S2 vertebrae as seen in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and bone scan (Fig. 20-10). It was determined that sacroplasty would be performed and there was no cement leakage into the L5-S1 intervertebral space during the procedure (Fig. 20-11). Two hours after completion of the sacroplasty, the patient experienced pain relief when standing and sitting, and was discharged.

image image image image image image

Figure 20–10 Case Study 20.1: Preoperative magnetic resonance image shows the pathologic compression fracture of S1 and S2 vertebrae which is mixed signal at T2WI (A and C) and hypointense at T1WI (B and D). Bone scan reveals hot uptake of S1 and S2 vertebrae (E and F).

image image image image image image image image image image image

Figure 20–11 Case Study 20.1: Postoperative sacrum anteroposterior (A) and lateral plain films (B) shows no cement leakage into the L5-S1 intervertebral space.and it is also revealed by CT scans (E, F and G) and three-dimensional computed tomography scans (B, C, H, I, J and K).