Percutaneous Biopsy Procedures: Techniques and Indications

Published on 23/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 1 (2 votes)

This article have been viewed 5504 times

Chapter 13 Percutaneous Biopsy Procedures

Techniques and Indications

This chapter describes the techniques and equipment available to obtain diagnostic samples from intrathoracic and selected extrathoracic lesions by the percutaneous route. The common lesions sampled and their locations are listed in Figure 13-1. The most frequent methods of sampling intrathoracic lesions, depending on their site, are summarized in Figure 13-2. The techniques and indications are different from those required to diagnose more diffuse intrapulmonary disease. The latter, which includes conditions such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, requires a transbronchial lung biopsy or an open lung biopsy through a mini-thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) procedure.

Imaging plays an important role in detecting and confirming the site of lesions and in evaluating their size and the quality of the surrounding tissues. Imaging is also used to assess the extent of pathology and the presence of other diseases. The radiologist determines whether lesions are amenable to percutaneous sampling, selects the optimum target for biopsy (often with the aid of positron emission tomography [PET] imaging), and decides which imaging modality is best suited to guide intervention. The choice and size of needle depend on the site, size, and solidity of the lesion, as well as the operator’s personal preference. Cores of tissue are invariably obtained, in keeping with requirements for immunohistochemistry analysis, and, increasingly, to assess for the presence of mutations to assist targeted therapy in lung cancer.

Methods of Tissue Sampling

Imaging Techniques

Several factors are considered in selecting the most appropriate imaging modality to guide percutaneous tissue sampling. These include the site, size, and depth of the lesion; its proximity to the pleura and neurovascular structures; and performance status of the patient.

Integrated Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) has an established role in the detection and staging of neoplastic diseases. In lung cancer it provides information on the primary lesion, early nodal involvement, and distant metastases. The positron-emitting agent most frequently used is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). This tracer accumulates at sites of increased glycolysis (e.g., tumor cells), and this activity is then detected by the PET camera. The intensity of activity is displayed on a color scale, and a quantitative assessment is made by measuring the standardized uptake value (SUV).

CT combined with PET allows accurate anatomic localization of FDG-avid foci. This technique is particularly useful in isolating active foci surrounded by benign changes, such as within thickened pleura, or in separating tumor from collapse, allowing greater precision in positioning the biopsy needle (Figure 13-3).

The sensitivity of PET is limited by the size of the lesion. Small lesions (usually less than 1 cm) may not accumulate sufficient FDG to be detected on PET imaging, leading to false-negative results. The latter can also occur in tumors with relatively low metabolic activity such as carcinoids and alveolar cell cancers.

Inflammatory conditions such as bacterial pneumonias, abscesses, tuberculosis, and active sarcoidosis are associated with increased granulocytic activity. Such activity promotes increased uptake of FDG, potentially giving rise to false-positive results.

Needles

The two main modes of sampling are fine needle aspiration (FNA) for cytologic study and core biopsy for histopathologic examination. Both methods retrieve samples that are suitable for culture. Although the sensitivity of FNA is improved by having a cytologist present to ensure that an adequate sample is obtained, the diagnostic yield in benign disease remains low (20% to 50%) compared with that for core biopsy (70%) (Greif et al., 1999). In malignant disease, the techniques are analogous, with a sensitivity of 90% to 95% (Klein et al., 1996). The clinical requirement for cores of tissue for immunohistochemical analysis has led to a reduction in the use of FNA, and when feasible, cores are always obtained.

FNA involves inserting a fine needle into a lesion and carefully moving the tip to and fro within the tissue, to obtain an aspirate. Gentle suction can be applied by attaching a 5-mL syringe to the needle hub. A variety of fine needles are available, including the Westcott, Chiba, Franseen, and Rotex needles, which range in size from 20 to 23 gauge. Larger-gauge needles are smaller in caliber and less rigid in design, which can limit their use. The Westcott needle has the advantage of having a trough close to the needle tip, which captures small cores of tissue in approximately 50% of cases. The main use of FNA is to obtain nodal aspirates.

Core biopsy specimens are obtained using cutting needles, which are larger in diameter (14 to 18 gauge) and are available in different lengths (6-, 9-, and 15-cm lengths are commonly used). These needles are more sturdy, allowing greater control in placement. Cutting needles are typically mounted on a spring-loaded mechanism. Older designs such as the Bard Biopty biopsy system, when triggered, simultaneously fire an inner notched stylet and an outer cutting cannula. The handle of the Bard system is bulky but reusable (Figure 13-4). Newer, lighter designs include the Cook Quickcore and Bauer Temno devices, which allow the inner notched stylet to be advanced and secured within the lesion before the cutting cannula is activated. The throw can be increased from 1 to 2 cm to obtain better core samples (Figure 13-5). The Cook device seems to have a slightly sharper needle tip, which in practice can be advanced through tougher tissues.

Historically, it was believed that use of larger cutting needles carried higher complication rates than those associated with fine needles. A 2002 study of practice based in the United Kingdom analyzed data from 5444 lung biopsy and FNA procedures and found no difference between the two methods, a conclusion supported by other studies (Richardson et al., 2002).

With transpulmonary biopsy, the risk of pneumothorax is more closely related to the number of pleural passes. The introduction of a coaxial system has transformed lung biopsies. A single pleural pass is made with a thin-walled introducer needle (usually 16 gauge). A smaller cutting needle (usually 18 gauge with a 1- or 2-cm throw) is inserted through the introducer and multiple cores are taken without repuncturing the pleura. The process is quicker, simpler, and safer than attempting multiple pleural passes, leading to a reduction in the complication rate with an improved diagnostic yield (Figure 13-6).

Percutaneous Biopsy of Intrapulmonary Lesions

Indications

The role of percutaneous lung biopsy in diagnosing malignant disease is well established, with a sensitivity of 90% to 95%. Its main application is in patients with inoperable lung cancer, when sputum cytology and bronchoscopy are nondiagnostic, to provide a means of establishing cell type before chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In the past, both FNA and core biopsy have been comparable in diagnosing and distinguishing small cell lung cancer (SCLC) from non-SCLC (NSCLC), providing oncologists with sufficient information to make choices regarding appropriate chemotherapy regimens. New targeted chemotherapy and biologic agents (e.g., the epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] inhibitor drugs) have proven prognostic benefit with particular histologic subtypes. This has meant that core sampling is essential to allow routine performance of detailed tissue analysis. FNA can be adequate to differentiate between subtypes of NCSLC, but it remains less accurate overall than core biopsy. The latter allows sufficient material to be obtained for both accurate histologic subtyping and molecular testing (e.g., to determine EGFR mutation status) (Barnes et al., 2010).

Biopsy also is widely used to exclude lung metastases in patients with potentially operable lung tumors, and in those with extrathoracic malignancies (Figure 13-7).

With solitary pulmonary lesions, core biopsy remains the prudent approach for confirming benign disease. The combined use of CT guidance and the coaxial biopsy system, which allows multiple cores to be taken safely, has improved the diagnostic accuracy of this technique in both benign and malignant disease. If malignancy is strongly suspected, it may be best to avoid biopsy and proceed straight to surgery.

Transthoracic biopsy and FNA also have a role in the diagnosis of non-neoplastic disease. Both techniques are increasingly being used to obtain samples for identification of microorganisms, particularly in immunocompromised patients with consolidation and masses. All samples are routinely sent to both histology (or cytology) and microbiology. Communication with the referring clinician is essential. In cases in which infection is suspected, the first sample should be sent to microbiology should the procedure need to be unexpectedly abandoned. The converse is true in suspected cases of malignancy where the first sample is sent to histology. The working diagnosis may also influence the choice of needle size.

Contraindications

The contraindications to percutaneous lung biopsy are largely relative and are summarized in Table 13-1. In general, patients need to be able to cooperate, including lying still in the desired position, resisting excessive coughing, and controlling breathing. In patients with very poor lung function, biopsy of a lesion is still possible, provided that the lesion is peripheral and a carefully considered route is identified (usually with CT) that does not traverse lung parenchyma. In performing the biopsy, care is taken to avoid creating a pneumothorax, which could be life-threatening. Before the procedure, a coagulation screen is performed according to local protocol, and bleeding diatheses are corrected, when appropriate, to keep within safe guidelines. Biopsy of parenchymal hydatid lesions has been documented, but an increased and probably unacceptable risk of anaphylactic reaction has been documented in patients with such lesions.

Table 13-1 Contraindications to Needle Biopsy

Type of Contraindication Comment
Relative Inability of patient to cooperate: uncontrollable cough, inability to lie prone or supine
Poor lung function/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (FEV1 <40% of predicted normal or multiple bullae)
Pneumonectomy
Bleeding disorder
Pulmonary hypertension
Pulmonary fibrosis
Small nodules (<5 mm in diameter)
Hydatid disease (associated with risk of anaphylactic reaction)
Absolute Arteriovenous malformation with high pulmonary artery pressure

FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

Procedure

Preparation

Percutaneous biopsy procedures are arranged as short-stay cases, with the expectation that patients will return home the same day, after a period of observation.

Before the appointment, all patients must have a complete blood count (CBC), and the international normalized ratio (INR) must be checked and corrected when appropriate, to reduce the risk of bleeding. A platelet count greater than 150 × 109/L and an INR of 1.4 or less are acceptable lower and upper limits, respectively. Antiplatelet agents (e.g., aspirin, clopidogrel) should be withheld for several days preceding intervention (5 days for aspirin, 7 to 10 days for clopidogrel).

Percutaneous lung biopsy requires that the patient fast beforehand. On the day of the procedure, the patient is admitted to the programmed investigation unit (PIU), where a baseline set of observations are recorded (including heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation).

The radiologist performing the procedure explains the process, enquires about relevant allergies, and after addressing any queries, obtains written informed consent, documenting potential complications, which occur at a rate greater than 1%. The patient is informed that several samples may need to be taken. Sedation is rarely required but can be used in anxious patients. For administration of such agents, intravenous access is established, and cardiorespiratory monitoring is required. Audio aids (e.g., iPods) are invaluable in relaxing younger patients and adults who are restless.

Practical Aspects

The patient is positioned supine or prone, depending on the anteroposterior location of the lesion. Pillows are used to elevate one side of the chest if necessary, and the arms are positioned to optimize access, avoiding elevation above the head, which typically causes shoulder discomfort in elderly persons.

Radiopaque surface skin markers are placed 0.5 to 1.0 cm apart over the region of interest, and a limited CT scan covering the area is performed with the patient in gentle respiration (Figure 13-8). Once the target lesion is identified, the safest percutaneous route to the lesion is mapped along the axial and sagittal axes, using the CT slice number and surface markers, respectively, as a guide. A cross is drawn on the patient’s skin to mark the corresponding entry site and a sterile field is created. Lidocaine 1% (10 to 15 mL) or 2% (5 mL) is infiltrated down to the pleura, with care taken not to puncture the visceral pleura or lung. The patient is warned that it is not always possible to anesthetize the pleura fully, because of the risk of pneumothorax from the anesthetic needle.

With use of the coaxial system, the introducer needle is advanced first, through a small skin incision. Because formal breathing instructions can be confusing to the patient, the respiratory phase is judged from movements of the chest wall. A slight “give” is felt when the pleura is breached, and this thrust should be performed with a smooth, firm motion to avoid shearing the pleura, thereby increasing the chance of a pneumothorax. The progression of the needle toward the lesion and the final position of its tip are intermittently checked by repeating the initial scan as required. One-centimeter markers visable along the length of the introducer needle are a useful guide when advancing the needle. Accurate placement of the needle tip is essential and may take time with small and mobile lesions.

Once the introducer needle is optimally positioned, the central stylet is removed and a finger placed over the hub to prevent air embolism. The cutting needle is then inserted through the lumen of the introducer, and multiple cores are taken, with replacement of the stylet between biopsy maneuvers. The tip of the cutting needle can be angled differently with each thrust, to obtain a representative sample—a technique that is particularly useful when tumors show histologic heterogeneity. Saline (2 to 3 mL) can be injected and aspirated through the introducer needle to obtain microorganisms, when indicated.

Once sufficient samples are obtained safely, the introducer needle is removed in a single swift motion during expiration, and a postbiopsy scan is performed if a pneumothorax is suspected.

Complications

A risk-benefit analysis should always be made before any procedure, particularly in high-risk groups (Table 13-2).

Table 13-2 Complications of Needle Biopsy

Category Complication/Cause
Early complications Pneumothorax: 5-50%
Hemoptysis: 5-10%
Hemorrhage: 10-40%
Air embolism: rare
Late complications Tumor seeding: extremely rare
Empyema
Bronchopleural fistula
Increased risk of pneumothorax Common associations:

Less common associations:

The most common complication after lung biopsy is pneumothorax (Figure 13-9). Most pneumothoraces are small (less than 2 cm on chest film) and are managed conservatively. Those requiring intervention usually are detected early: 88% immediately after biopsy and the remainder after 1 hour. A delayed presentation is rare. Intervention can involve aspiration by way of a three-way tap or drainage through a one-way (Heimlich) valve; drainage is performed at a frequency of 0 to 17%. Positioning the patient with the puncture site dependent can reduce the pneumothorax rate and should be considered in patients at high risk. Surprisingly, use of a cutting needle does not increase the incidence of pneumothorax over that with fine needle aspiration, the pneumothorax rate being in the range of 3% to 42%. Tension pneumothorax is rare but may be seen in patients with emphysema. It develops within minutes and constitutes a medical emergency.

Minor perilesional hemorrhage is common (see Figure 13-9); however, actual hemoptysis occurs in only 4% to 5% of biopsy procedures (Richardson et al., 2002) and is more common in patients with pulmonary hypertension. It often follows a bout of coughing and can be extremely frightening for the patient. Supportive measures are initiated with the patient positioned biopsy side down. Treatment is rarely required, because spontaneous recovery is rapid. Massive hemoptysis rarely occurs and can be fatal.

Although rare, a systemic arterial air embolism is a serious and increasingly recognized complication of interventional lung procedures, and its effects can be clinically subtle (Hiraki et al., 2007). It occurs when air enters into the pulmonary venous circulation, is pumped through the left side of the heart, and subsequently enters the cerebral and coronary arteries, which become occluded. Air may enter the pulmonary veins by two main processes. It can be drawn in from the atmosphere, through the introducer needle on deep inspiration, when the hub is temporarily exposed in between biopsies. Entry of air through this route is avoided by promptly covering the hub with the thumb each time the cutting needle or stylet is withdrawn, and by asking the patient to hold the breath during the process. Alternatively, air can enter the pulmonary veins through the airways along the needle tract during a bout of coughing. To prevent this from occurring, needles should be removed during uncontrollable coughing. Rapid diagnosis and treatment of a pulmonary venous air embolism are essential. The patient should be placed in the right lateral decubitus position, and 100% oxygen should be administered while awaiting transfer to a hyperbaric oxygen chamber if available. A CT scan of the head and chest should be performed to confirm the diagnosis.

Reported mortality rates for transpulmonary biopsy range from 0.07% to 0.15% (Richardson et al., 2002; Tomiyama et al., 2006). Death may result from cardiac arrest, systemic arterial air embolism, tension pneumothorax, or hemorrhage.

Pitfalls and Controversies

In malignant disease, percutaneous sampling of pulmonary lesions carries a high sensitivity with use of the coaxial system, even if the nodules are small. This has reduced the need to recall patients for repeat biopsies, because the sensitivity for detection of malignancy has risen to 90% to 95%.

In benign disease, FNA has a relatively poor diagnostic yield. Sensitivity is improved by obtaining multiple cores using a cutting needle and the coaxial system, a technique that has been used in the diagnosis of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, Wegener granulomatosis, and some infections.

Diagnostic difficulties still arise with lesions exhibiting a high level of fibrosis—for example, metastatic breast carcinoma and Hodgkin disease. Excess mucus production as in bronchoalveolar carcinoma also can interfere with establishing the diagnosis.

Biopsy of a solitary mass with suspected malignancy that is potentially operable remains controversial, because the lesion is likely to need removal. In any case, the advantages of biopsy are that the patient and the surgeon are better informed, and that the operation time is shortened by avoiding the need for frozen sections.

There remain four indications for biopsy of a noncalcified solitary pulmonary nodule: First, if benign disease is suspected, biopsy may obviate the need for surgery; second, in a lung cancer patient who is a poor operative candidate, it may be necessary to obtain tissue to optimize treatment with nonsurgical therapies (radiotherapy with curative intent); third, in a patient with an extrathoracic malignancy where a metastasis is suspected; fourth, a fully informed patient may wish to confirm the diagnosis of cancer, even if the suspicion of cancer is high, before proceeding to surgery.

Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy: General Principles

Practical Aspects

The site of the lesion or tissue usually determines the optimal positioning of the patient. For example, nontargeted pleural biopsy requires that the patient sit upright, facing away from the radiologist, with the arms folded to spread apart the shoulder blades. Supraclavicular node sampling, on the other hand, is performed with the patient supine, with the shoulders raised on a pillow, allowing the neck to be slightly hyperextended. Time spent ensuring that both patient and radiologist are comfortable helps ensure a quick procedure, avoiding unwanted “shuffling.”

With targeted biopsy procedures, the ultrasound probe (curvilinear or linear) is adjusted until the lesion can be seen along its greatest length. Once this is achieved, the probe is held secure, and a line is drawn on the patient’s skin to mark the orientation of the probe, which is then removed. The skin entry site is prepared, and a cryogesic (ethyl chloride) freezing spray can be applied to numb the skin, particularly in young patients.

Under sterile conditions, the probe is reapplied to the skin (using the marker as a guide to positioning), and local anesthetic (up to 10 mL of 1% lidocaine) is infiltrated down to the lesion using a 21 gauge (green) needle. Deep to the skin, the needle is kept in view by advancing it directly in line with the transducer. The angle between the needle and the skin is adjusted depending on the depth of the lesion. Administering local anesthetic reduces discomfort for the patient, creates a passage to the lesion, and also gives the radiologist an idea of how to angle the larger biopsy needle.

Depending on the size of the lesion, a cutting needle with a 1- or 2-cm throw is selected. Adjacent lymph nodes can be lined up and sampled simultaneously, enabling the 2-cm throw to be used more often, which is preferable, because it provides a better specimen (Figure 13-10). After a small skin incision is made, the biopsy needle is introduced and carefully observed as it is advanced toward and into the lesion. With the tip of the needle secured well within the lesion (which often requires a firm nudge to pierce its capsule or wall), the whole apparatus can be flattened out, so that the inner stylet can be advanced through but not out of the lesion. Once the stylet is optimally positioned, the biopsy specimen is taken by pushing the trigger, after the patient is warned to expect a clicking sound. The needle is then swiftly withdrawn, and pressure is applied to the skin to control any bleeding; the process is repeated as appropriate after the first sample is retrieved.

Percutaneous Sampling of Extrapulmonary Intrathoracic Tissues

Mediastinal Nodes and Masses

Method

Depending on the location, mediastinal lesions can be accessed endoscopically (by the transbronchial or transesophageal route), surgically with VATS or through an anterior mediastinotomy, or percutaneously under image guidance, if a safe route that avoids traversing the lung is available.

CT is preferred to ultrasound imaging to guide percutaneous mediastinal biopsy, because it helps to map a direct route through the chest wall to the mass, which avoids puncturing lung or vessels (particularly the internal mammary vessels). Contrast-enhanced CT and color Doppler ultrasound techniques are essential tools for assessing vascularity.

With large mediastinal masses abutting the chest wall, a biopsy route that avoids the lung parenchyma is readily available (Figure 13-11). With smaller lesions, a safer route may be achieved with use of a transpleural approach through an existing effusion or pneumothorax. Saline can be injected into the pleural space where there is no effusion, or directly into the mediastinum, providing an extrapleural route. Placing the patient in the lateral decubitus position to shift the mediastinum also can help to create an extrapulmonary route. These alternative approaches are associated with reduced incidence of complications.

Core biopsy specimens are necessary to diagnose primary mediastinal tumors (e.g., lymphomas, thymomas). Multiple cores for immunohistochemistry studies are required to differentiate lymphoma from other lesions and can be obtained using the coaxial needle technique.

Pleural and Chest Wall Disease

Non-targeted pleural biopsy often is performed to diagnose benign conditions such as pleural tuberculosis. Targeted pleural and chest wall biopsies usually are undertaken to exclude malignant disease, which may be suggested by focal FDG avidity detected on PET imaging. Cores of tissue are essential in differentiating mesothelioma from metastatic adenocarcinoma.

Method for Targeted Pleural and Chest Wall Biopsies

Targeted pleural and chest wall biopsies are indicated to sample a discrete mass and are usually performed under ultrasound guidance (Figure 13-12). If visualization is difficult with use of ultrasound imaging, or if the lesion is small, with insufficient pleural fluid, biopsy is performed under CT guidance. The optimum route is one that runs along the main axis of the pathologic process (i.e., an oblique tract), allowing more of the lesion to be sampled with less risk of pneumothorax (Figure 13-13).

Several cores (at least three) are taken, and if the pleura is not particularly thickened, multiple passes may be required. Radiologists favor the 18 gauge Cook Quickcore or Temno cutting device. The coaxial system can be used for pleural biopsy procedures performed under CT guidance. Samples are sent for microbiologic and histologic examination. If the pleural lesion is large and the patient remains asymptomatic after biopsy, no chest radiograph is required before discharge.

Percutaneous Sampling of Extrathoracic Lesions

During staging of thoracic malignancies, lesions may be identified in the liver, adrenal glands, lymph nodes or bones. If appearances suggest metastases (e.g., increased FDG avidity on PET imaging), it is essential to perform a biopsy to confirm inoperability (Figure 13-14). If multiple sites are involved, several factors are considered in deciding which tissue to sample—for example, the extent of the disease, the likelihood of obtaining a diagnostic sample safely, and how accessible the site is with a minimally invasive approach.

Liver

Method

Hepatic lesions usually are biopsied under ultrasound guidance, where they are easily imaged and rapidly sampled (Figure 13-15). Owing to the risk of bleeding and the potential need for intervention, preoperative preparation of the patient includes fasting for 6 hours before the procedure.

Ultrasound scanning is performed with the patient supine, with the right arm elevated to allow access to the right upper quadrant. The liver is scanned with a curvilinear probe, and the optimum target is identified. Metastatic deposits can be well- or ill-defined and will vary in size, number, echogenicity, and echotexture, but most often they are solid and hypoechoic relative to the surrounding parenchyma. The lesion that can be reached by the shortest intraparenchymal route while avoiding the gallbladder and the hepatic and portal vessels (which are highlighted on color Doppler) is selected for sampling.

With strict adherence to aseptic technique, local anesthetic is infiltrated down to the liver capsule, which has a rich neurovascular supply. The tip of the anesthetic needle is kept in full view to avoid breaching the capsule, because this can increase the risk of bleeding. A small skin incision is then made, and a larger cutting needle is introduced (usually 18 gauge); radiologists at our institution favor the traditional Bard Biopty biopsy system, which obtains a 1-cm core. The biopsy sample is taken with the patient in arrested respiration to limit movement. If insufficient tissue is obtained with a single core, the biopsy can be repeated. However, careful risk-benefit analysis should be made, owing to the increased risk of hemorrhage associated with multiple passes (Grant et al., 1999). In practice, no more than two cores are usually taken. Although multiple cores are avoided, the coaxial system can still be useful, as hemostatic agents (such as Gelfoam sponge) can be inserted down the introducer needle as it is withdrawn, helping to control bleeding along the biopsy tract.

Adrenal Glands

Biopsy of adrenal lesions is usually performed under CT guidance (Figure 13-16). It may be necessary to traverse the pulmonary or hepatic parenchyma to enter the adrenal mass. If the mass is on the side opposite the primary lung carcinoma, the pulmonary parenchymal route should be avoided, because a pneumothorax could delay surgery or result in significant respiratory compromise. A coaxial system is invaluable, allowing several aspirates or cores to be obtained with a single pass of the introducer needle.

Lymph Nodes

Biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes (greater than 1 cm in short axis) often provides diagnostic tissue when it is difficult to obtain from the primary lung lesion and also aids staging. Smaller, subcentimeter nodes can be targeted if increased FDG activity on PET imaging suggests early metastatic involvement.

The supraclavicular regions, axillae, and retroperitoneum are the usual sites of lymphadenopathy in primary diseases of the lung. In lung cancer, detecting supraclavicular lymph node metastases is crucial, because it constitutes a contraindication to surgery (stage IIIB).

Ultrasound imaging is commonly used to identify and sample abnormal nodes. Nearly a third of patients with lung cancer have nonpalpable supraclavicular nodal metastases, detectable on ultrasound-guided FNA. This frequency increases to almost 50% in patients who have mediastinal nodal metastases. The advantage of ultrasound imaging is that it allows accurate assessment of nodal size and can identify pathologic features (e.g., rounded morphology, loss of echogenic hilum, peripheral vascularity) that are not detectable clinically.

Superficial nodes, including supraclavicular and axillary, are amenable to ultrasound-guided biopsy, which is a simple and safe procedure. Biopsy of retroperitoneal masses (including lymph nodes) requires CT guidance (Figure 13-17). Core biopsy is preferable to FNA. A 16 or 18 gauge cutting needle is used, depending on the site.

Pleural Drainage

Procedure

A large effusion can be drained without image guidance, but smaller or multiloculated effusions are better drained by the radiologist. For this procedure, the seated patient leans forward, “hugging” a pillow against the chest to bring the arms forward and clear the scapulae from the back. A small stool placed under the feet makes the patient feel more comfortable, and the optimum skin position is marked, just above a rib to avoid the intercostal vessels and nerves. A sterile technique with local anesthetic is used. The size of the drainage catheter varies, ranging between small pigtail catheters and large catheters for empyemas.

The depth of the effusion can be judged by both ultrasound imaging and with use of the local anesthetic needle. The catheter can be positioned by means of a Seldinger technique or with a single-step procedure. The latter is often used and involves advancing the catheter with its central stylet into the pleural space. A slight “give” is felt when the pleura is breached, and at this point the catheter is advanced into the effusion while the central stylet is simultaneously withdrawn. The catheter is connected rapidly to a drainage bag and a three-way tap. Samples for cytologic, microbiologic, and biochemical analysis are taken. If drainage is for a short time (24 to 48 hours), use of a bag will normally suffice. If drainage is required for a longer duration (normal with empyemas) or if the effusion is large—presumably because of active fluid production, the drainage bag is replaced by an underwater drainage system.

If aspiration is undertaken, no more than 1.5 L of fluid should be removed at any one time because of the risk of reexpansion pulmonary edema. Larger catheters can be used, but smaller catheters usually are adequate and more comfortable. The catheters should be securely fastened to the skin, and regular saline irrigation should be performed to maintain patency (20 mL of saline every 4 to 6 hours). In some patients, intrapleural fibrinolytics (e.g., streptokinase) given early may improve drainage but are not routinely used, because use of such agents has not been found to reduce long-term mortality or complication rates and may be associated with adverse reactions.

Suggested Readings

Adams RF, Gleeson FV. Percutaneous image-guided cutting-needle biopsy of the pleura in the presence of a suspected malignant effusion. Radiology. 2001;219:510–514.

Arakawa H, Nakajima Y, Kurihara Y, et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: a comparison between automated biopsy gun and fine needle aspiration. Clin Radiol. 1996;51:503–506.

Barnes D, Souza C, Entwisle J. The role of percutaneous biopsy in the evolving diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:951–952.

Fultz PJ, Harrow AR, Elvey SP, et al. Sonographically guided biopsy of supraclavicular lymph nodes: a simple alternative to lung biopsy and other more invasive procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1403–1409.

Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, et al. Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132(3 Suppl):108S–130S.

Grant A, Neuberger J. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice. Gut. 1999;45:IV1–IV11.

Greif J, Marmor S, Schwarz Y, et al. Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration in diagnosing benign lung lesions. Acta Cytol. 1999;43:756–760.

Gupta S, Seaberg K, Wallace MJ, et al. Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal lesions: different approaches and anatomic considerations. Radiographics. 2005;25:763–786.

Hare SS, Gupta A, Goncalves AT, et al. Systemic arterial air embolism after percutaneous lung biopsy. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:589–596.

Henry M, Arnold T, Harvey J. BTS guidelines for management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorax. 2003;58:ii39.

Hiraki T, Fujiwara H, Sakurai J, et al. Nonfatal systemic air embolism complicating percutaneous CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: four cases from a single institution. Chest. 2007;132:684–690.

Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology. 1996;198:715–720.

Lacasse Y, Wong E, Guyatt G, Cook D. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of localised pulmonary lesions: a meta-analysis. Thorax. 1999;54:884–893.

Lucidarme O, Howarth N, Finet J-F, Grenier PA. Intrapulmonary lesions: percutaneous automated biopsy with a detachable, 18-gauge, co-axial cutting needle. Radiology. 1998;207:759–765.

McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, et al. A 21-year experience with major haemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology. 1990;99:1396–1400.

Piccininio F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, et al. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. J Hepatol. 1986;2:165–173.

Richardson CM, Pointon KS, Manhire AR, Macfarlane JT. Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:731–735.

Tokuda Y, Matsushima D, Stein GH, Miyagi S. Intrapleural fibrinolytic agents for empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions: a meta-analysis. Chest. 2006;129:783–790.

Tomiyama N, Yasuhara Y, Nakajima Y, et al. CT-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a survey of severe complications based on 9783 biopsies in Japan. Eur J Radiol. 2006;59:60–64.

Westcott JL, Rao N, Colley DP. Transthoracic needle biopsy of small pulmonary nodules. Radiology. 1997;202:97–103.