Pemphigus

Published on 05/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 05/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3102 times

23

Pemphigus

Chapters 2325 review the major autoimmune bullous diseases (Table 23.1). Because of the significant overlap in their clinical presentations, histologic examination of lesional skin (see Fig. 1.12B) as well as direct immunofluorescence (DIF) of perilesional skin (Figs. 23.123.3) are usually required in order to establish a specific diagnosis. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and/or ELISA of sera provide additional helpful information; for example, the latter can detect anti-desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) versus anti-Dsg1 antibodies.

image

Fig. 23.2 Basic techniques of direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). DIF is performed on skin biopsies to detect tissue-bound immunodeposits (see Fig. 23.1). IIF is performed utilizing patients’ sera to detect circulating autoantibodies that bind epithelial antigens. The preferred substrate for IIF is monkey esophagus for pemphigus vulgaris, guinea pig esophagus for pemphigus foliaceus, and human skin for the pemphigoid group and LABD.

Pemphigus is classically divided into three major groups: (1) pemphigus vulgaris, with pemphigus vegetans representing a rare variant; (2) pemphigus foliaceus, with pemphigus erythematosus representing an unusual localized variant, and fogo selvagem, an endemic form; and (3) paraneoplastic pemphigus. Additional subtypes include the two forms of IgA pemphigus and drug-induced pemphigus.