Palpable asymptomatic abdominal masses

Published on 13/02/2015 by admin

Filed under Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 5 (1 votes)

This article have been viewed 28668 times

19 Palpable asymptomatic abdominal masses

Case

Mrs PA, a 45-year-old previously well woman presented to her general practitioner for a health check as part of a life insurance renewal. She denied any current illness or symptom, but when her general practitioner carried out an abdominal examination a mass was palpated in the right upper quadrant. The mass was smooth, slightly tender and moved with respiration, suggesting it arose in the liver. Following first principles, her doctor first of all revisited her medical history and noted that Mrs X had been on the oral contraceptive pill for more than 20 years. Furthermore, on close questioning she admitted to intermittent low grade abdominal discomfort in the right upper quadrant over several years, but a little more frequently over the last few months. However, her general practitioner could not identify any other hepatic disease risk factor in her history, such as intravenous drug use or other exposure to hepatitis B or C infection, or exposure to hydatid disease, and could find no other physical abnormality, in particular no evidence of chronic liver disease. Mrs X was referred for liver function tests, viral screens and an abdominal ultrasound scan. Her transaminase levels were mildly elevated, hepatitis B and C serology were negative and there was a solid mass seen on ultrasound scanning. Mrs X was referred to a multidisciplinary hepatology unit and, after more detailed investigation, was eventually found to have a 12-cm mass protruding from the inferior margin of hepatic segment 5. The imaging characteristics including the presence of a central scar were consistent with focal nodular hyperplasia, thought to be unrelated to her oral contraceptive pill consumption. After discussion with a hepatologist, with a hepatic surgeon and with her general practitioner and family, Mrs X elected to undergo surgery for removal of the mass. Subsequent histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia. Her recovery was uneventful.

Introduction

The aim of this chapter is to give guidelines to assist clinicians in the five most common clinical scenarios within which palpable asymptomatic abdominal masses are detected:

Other chapters in this book are orientated to evaluation of symptomatic abdominal masses, abdominal distension and lumps in the groin. Chapter 26 discusses masses detected as incidental findings on abdominal imaging (incidentalomas).

Documenting the Finding of an Abdominal Mass

Masses within the Abdominal Wall

The different types of abdominal wall hernias and their features are listed in Box 19.1. Abdominal wall hernias are generally easy to characterise as a cough impulse is usually present, the hernia may present in a characteristic position and it may be possible to reduce the hernia. To separate other masses found within the abdominal wall from masses within the abdominal cavity, ask the patient to contract the anterior abdominal muscles by lifting his or her head from the examining couch with hands behind head, or to straight leg raise both legs simultaneously while keeping the head on the bed. This may help to define the mass as follows:

A mass within the abdominal cavity (the peritoneal cavity) will be made less distinct, less easy to palpate and may disappear altogether until the abdominal wall muscles are relaxed again.

Retroperitoneal Masses

The retroperitoneal region is subdivided into five regions:

Intraabdominal Masses

Site

On the basis of position (Fig 19.1), we can start to define the likely organ of origin of an intraabdominal mass as shown in Table 19.1. However, we cannot be certain of the organ of origin of a palpable mass on the basis of its position alone. Organs do not necessarily enlarge concentrically from a fixed point. The pattern of enlargement may be determined by surrounding structures, by retroperitoneal attachments and by the pathological process responsible for the organ enlargement. The liver, for example, is limited by the diaphragm along the superior surface and by the diaphragm and ribs along the lateral surface and so tends to enlarge downwards and inwards. The uterus and bladder are limited by the pelvic walls laterally and below and so tend to enlarge upwards in the midline. The kidneys, aorta and pancreas are retroperitoneal and limited behind by the posterior abdominal wall and so tend to expand from their original site in all directions except posterior. An enlarged segment of small bowel is usually not found in the upper reaches of the abdomen because the transverse mesocolon, the transverse colon and the greater omentum are attached to retroperitoneal tissues along a horizontal line at the level of the inferior border of the pancreas. These three organs tend to form a barrier restricting upward migration of small bowel masses.

Table 19.1 Organ of origin of intraabdominal masses by region

Right hypochondrium Epigastrium Left hypochondrium
Right lobe of liver Stomach Spleen
Gall bladder Left lobe of liver Pancreas
  Pancreas Stomach
  Lymph nodes  
  Aorta  
Right lumbar region Periumbilical Left lumbar
Ascending colon Omentum Descending colon
Right kidney Transverse colon Left kidney
  Aorta  
  Retroperitoneal nodes  
Right iliac fossa Hypogastrium Left iliac fossa
Appendix Bladder Sigmoid colon
Caecum Uterus Iliac aneurysm
Iliac aneurysm Right and left ovary Left ovary
Right ovary   Iliac nodes
Iliac nodes    

Strictly retroperitoneal in position

A single pathological process may have focal or diffuse effects in a given organ and may have different effects on the different organs involved. A cancer of the sigmoid colon may become fixed to the posterior abdominal wall by local invasion. Omental metastatic deposits from the same sigmoid colon cancer will not move with respiration but may be relatively mobile on palpation. Hepatic metastatic deposits from the same cancer may move with respiration as the liver moves, but will not move on palpation.

An enlarged organ may come to fill several adjacent abdominal regions if the degree of enlargement is great. Thus, in the third trimester of pregnancy, an enlarged pregnant uterus can be expected to fill the hypogastrium, the periumbilical region and part of the epigastrium.

The likely organ of origin may be defined by the position of the mass as in Table 19.1.

Discriminating clues that may be found on examination and that the patient may report on closer questioning may help establish the causative process. See Table 19.2 and Box 19.2.

Shape, edge and consistency

The most common asymptomatic intraabdominal mass is caused by faecal loading of a segment of colon (Fig 19.3), usually caecum or sigmoid colon. A loaded colon tends to be tubular or sausage-shaped with a lobular surface contour. The orientation of a caecum loaded with faeces is vertical, while that of sigmoid colon is oblique, parallel to the inguinal ligament. Pressure on the surface of the mass by pressing a finger or thumb into it through the anterior abdominal wall may result in indentation of the surface of the mass. This is an uncommon but characteristic diagnostic feature of constipation with faecal loading.

Malignant tumours tend to be vaguely nodular to palpation; benign tumours usually have a smooth contour. Malignant tumours tend to be hard in consistency, whereas benign tumours may be soft.

Tender or non-tender

An asymptomatic abdominal mass is unlikely to be tender. Tenderness implies inflammation, which may be due to infection, infarction or haemorrhage into the mass (Table 19.3).

Table 19.3 Tender abdominal masses

Position of mass Features on examination Diagnosis
Right hypochondrium Localised, moves with
respiration, can’t get above it
Acute cholecystitis, empyema of the gall bladder
Haemorrhage or infarction in a liver tumour (or cyst)
Right hypochondrium Enlarged liver Cholangitis
Portal pyaemia
Hepatic metastases
Acute severe right heart failure
Epigastric Immobile Pancreatic pseudocyst
Pancreatic phlegmon
Dissection in abdominal aortic aneurysm
Left hypochondrium Enlarged spleen Splenic infarct
Right loin Enlarged kidney Pyonephrosis
Renal cell carcinoma
Periumbilical Pulsatile Dissection in abdominal aortic aneurysm
Right iliac fossa Immobile Appendix phlegmon/abscess
Crohn’s disease
Hypogastrium Enlarged bladder
Enlarged uterus
Enlarged ovary
Acute urinary retention
Haemorrhage or infarction in a fibroid
Haemorrhage or infarction in an ovarian
tumour/cyst
Acute pyosalpinx
Left iliac fossa Immobile, sometimes palpable bimanually Acute diverticular phlegmon
Diverticular abscess

Usually symptomatic

Bimanually palpable on rectal or vaginal examination

Masses within the lower half of the abdomen, particularly those in the hypogastrium (inferior to the umbilicus), may arise from the pelvic organs, in particular the bladder, uterus or ovaries. Origin from within the pelvis may be suspected if the lower margin of a mass cannot be palpated because of the bony pubis. The mass should be further characterised by bimanual palpation from above and below. This is achieved by palpating the superior edge of the mass with one hand on the abdomen, while attempting to palpate the inferior edge with either the index finger of the other hand in the rectum or the index and middle fingers in the vagina. For a bimanual rectal examination, the patient is positioned in the left lateral decubitus position with the hips and knees flexed. For bimanual vaginal examination, the patient is positioned supine with hips and knees flexed and hips externally rotated.

If a mass arising from within the pelvis can be palpated bimanually its size, surface characteristics and relationship to the uterus may be ascertained using this technique. The lower edge of the bladder cannot be appreciated per rectum or per vagina. An ovarian mass should be distinguishable from the uterus bimanually; the circular indentation of the cervix is used to help identify the uterus.

Several other important observations may be made during a rectal examination. First, the rectum may be loaded with faeces. This is consistent with the presence of one or more abdominal masses caused by constipation. Secondly, there may be evidence of peritoneal spread of a malignant tumour of the stomach, colon or ovary. The sign to seek is the presence of a hard, irregular and relatively fixed tumour mass anterior to the rectum at the tip of the examining finger on rectal examination (Blumer’s shelf), though this is rare. Finally, there may be blood on the glove from a previously unsuspected colon cancer or the hard irregular mass of a rectal tumour (Ch 22).

Having defined the features of the mass, the clinician should review the clinical history with a focus on symptoms possibly associated with the provisional diagnoses. On specific questioning, symptoms that were previously overlooked by the patient might be recalled (see Box 19.3).

Other signs on general physical examination

The physical examination is completed mindful of the working diagnosis, based on the finding of an abdominal mass. Specific examples of relevant positive findings are listed in Table 19.4.

Table 19.4 Examples of extraabdominal signs that may be associated with an asymptomatic abdominal mass

Sign Associated abdominal mass
Pallor Gastrointestinal malignancy with occult bleeding
Wasting Advanced malignancy
Signs of chronic liver disease (palmar erythema, spider naevi, gynaecomastia, testicular atrophy, ascites, caput medusae) Splenomegaly associated with portal hypertension
Hepatic mass due to hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis
Hard, fixed irregular breast lump
Hard supraclavicular lymph node
Signs of pleural effusion
Hepatomegaly due to metastatic breast cancer
Epigastric mass due to stomach cancer
Mass of malignant origin or benign ovarian tumour
(Meigs’ syndrome)

Imaging

Confirmation of an abdominal mass or an enlarged abdominal organ on imaging

The next investigations depend on the results from ultrasound or CT scans.

Liver

First, ask yourself: is the enlargement uniform or irregular? The possible causes of a diffuse, uniform enlargement are listed in Box 19.4. If CT has detected small, low density but non-specific lesions or if liver enlargement is irregular or patchy, ultrasound scanning is useful to determine whether the lumps are solid or cystic. Evaluation of lumps in the liver is discussed in detail in Chapter 26. Cystic hepatic lesions are most commonly due to simple cysts. These may be quite large, may be multiple and are frequently discovered incidentally (Fig 19.5A and 19.5B). Though rare, hepatic neoplastic cysts (cystadenomas) should be excluded. Hydatid cysts are not infrequent in Echinococcus spp. endemic areas but are generally easy to diagnose on ultrasound or CT scans, which usually reveal daughter cysts within the main cyst.

If the hepatic lesion is single and solid, it is likely to be a solitary secondary deposit but may be a primary hepatoma, particularly if there is a history of chronic liver disease. The other single solid lesions discussed in Chapter 26 tend to be less massive and are less likely to cause hepatomegaly.

If hepatomegaly is due to multiple solid lesions, metastatic liver disease is the likely explanation. The next step will then be to establish the primary tumour site. The common sources are colon, pancreas, stomach, breast and lung. Histological confirmation of the diagnosis should usually be sought, provided this does not risk compromising the treatment and chances of cure by seeding along the biopsy track or by rupture of the tumour. A biopsy of the primary tumour is preferred as the histology from the liver may well be consistent with malignancy but still be non-discriminatory about the primary site. Furthermore, biopsy of a primary tumour, whether by gastroscopy, colonoscopy, bronchoscopy or needle biopsy, is generally safer than liver biopsy. If the primary tumour cannot be found, then ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy of the hepatic mass may be indicated to secure a diagnosis of metastatic disease but, even then, the primary site may remain enigmatic.

Gall bladder

Gall bladder enlargement due to obstruction of the common bile duct (e.g. carcinoma of the head of the pancreas or ampulla of Vater) will usually be associated with jaundice (Ch 23). A gallbladder mucocele usually forms a smooth, globular swelling in the right upper quadrant and may be relatively painless and non-tender. Enlargement due to carcinoma of the gall bladder is unusual.

Pancreas

On the basis of the ultrasound or CT scans, the clinician should know whether a pancreatic lesion is cystic or solid. If cystic it is likely to be either a pseudocyst of the pancreas or a neoplastic cyst (cystadenoma or rarely cystadenocarcinoma) (see Fig 19.6). For the diagnosis of pseudocyst, there should have been a definite prior episode of pancreatitis. The management of pancreatic pseudocyst is discussed in Chapter 4. The treatment of cystadenoma is surgical resection (Ch 26).

If the lesion is solid, then pancreatic cancer is likely. On ultrasound scanning pancreatic cancers often have a characteristic hypo-echoic appearance. The CT scan should be examined for evidence of spread to the liver, to peripancreatic and portal lymph nodes, encasement of the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein and dilatation of the pancreatic duct. Most malignant pancreatic tumours that have grown to the point where they are palpable on physical examination will be unresectable. Many of these tumours will also have caused obstructive jaundice by obstructing the common bile duct in the pancreas (see Ch 23). Primary tumours of the body and tail of the pancreas may also cause jaundice indirectly, when metastatic portal lymph nodes obstruct the hepatic ducts at the porta hepatis. The management of pancreatic cancer is considered in Chapter 17.

Spleen

Truly incidental splenomegaly is a very uncommon finding. The spleen has to be enlarged to several times its normal size to be palpable so most patients with splenomegaly will have symptoms from the causative process before the spleen is palpable. The causes of splenomegaly include infections, inflammatory diseases and haematological diseases liver diseases (Box 19.5). The most important gastroenterological cause of splenomegaly is portal hypertension (see Ch 24).

The spleen may be reported as enlarged on CT scanning but if the spleen is not palpable and there is no apparent cause, the radiological finding of slight splenic enlargement is often misleading.

Colon

Asymptomatic masses arising in the colon are most likely to be due to constipation or to tumours, usually malignant. Smaller benign tumours of the colon may cause intussusception, when the key presenting feature is usually colicky abdominal pain.

Faecal masses (Fig 19.3) are quite firm but should be indentable and should disappear with purgation. Neoplastic masses arising in the colon are usually firm to hard. They may or may not be mobile, but do not indent. As is also the case for masses in the stomach, colonic masses are poorly imaged by ultrasound. By the time colonic neoplastic masses are palpable, the origin in colon can usually be determined by CT scan. However, conclusive diagnosis requires a tissue biopsy for histopathology. Biopsy usually requires a colonoscopy. Staging of malignant tumours is described in Chapter 22.

Small bowel

A palpable small bowel mass will be apparent on CT. The causes of asymptomatic small bowel masses are shown in Table 19.5. Unlike the stomach and the colon, endoscopy of the small bowel is difficult. If further radiological imaging of a small bowel mass is required after CT, it is usually achieved by small bowel series, often carried out as a small bowel enema or CT enterography. If radiological imaging has not been adequate and there is no suggestion of an obstructing lesion in the small bowel, capsule endoscopy may be indicated. Small bowel enteroscopy is available in highly specialised centres.

Table 19.5 Causes of small bowel masses

Cause Pathology Comment
Cyst Mesenteric cyst

Tumour Benign Malignant

Intussusception   May have a polyp or tumour at its leading edge Inflammation Crohn’s disease

Preoperative biopsy of a small bowel tumour may not be possible. However, a PET scan may reveal a glucose avid tumour in the small bowel, suggesting malignancy, either adenocarcinoma or lymphoma. If the neoplastic process is confined to the small bowel, histological confirmation may not be achieved until small bowel resection has been carried out. If there is disease outside the small bowel, for instance in lymph nodes or in the liver, biopsy of these may yield definitive histopathology.

Other Investigations

Significant liver replacement Coagulation studies should be checked prior to any intervention (e.g. liver biopsy) that might be complicated by excessive bleeding Possible hydatid disease of the liver Hydatid serology—to confirm the diagnosis and to ensure that biopsy is not attempted as leakage from the cyst might cause intraperitoneal spread of the disease (Ch 26) Pancreatic mass

Tissue diagnosis

A definitive tissue diagnosis should be sought for any abdominal mass that is or that might be neoplastic. This information is essential for a secure final diagnosis, to establish prognosis and in the selection of treatments, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or other interventions. Furthermore, patients and their families also require accurate information about diagnosis, prognosis, management plans and possible outcomes for informed consent to treatments and to organise personal, family and business affairs. An accurate tissue diagnosis is a fundamental requirement.

As indicated above, a biopsy should be taken from the primary tumour if possible. This is especially so for tumours of the stomach, colon, lung, breast, pancreas and skin. For stomach, colon and lung, the biopsy is usually taken using an endoscopic technique. For breast and pancreas, it is by direct puncture (needle biopsy), guided radiologically if the primary is impalpable.

Most liver masses can be accessed for percutaneous biopsy utilising imaging guidance. However, bleeding, bile leakage, tumour rupture and biopsy track dissemination can occur as a result of the procedure. Hepatocellular carcinomas extending to the liver surface are at particular risk for these consequences of needle biopsy. Thus, specialist liver surgery opinion should always be sought before a radiologist is asked to perform a biopsy of a primary or metastatic liver neoplasm, especially if there is any chance at all that the lesion may be surgically resectable.

Tumour biopsy by laparoscopic or open abdominal operation may occasionally be required to finalise a diagnosis if fine needle biopsy is unsafe (e.g. some hepatocellular carcinomas), or unlikely to yield diagnostic material (e.g. liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum).