Pain management in the emergency department

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1353 times

Chapter 13 Pain management in the emergency department

Emergency physicians should be competent in the management of pain. The early relief of pain is a right and an expectation when a patient presents to the emergency department. The management of pain is often compromised by misunderstandings, myths, prejudice and inappropriate reliance on inflexible cookbook formulas. Good patient care demands effective pain relief; failure to effectively manage pain is a failure in the quality of care.

Many patients presenting to the emergency department in pain, including those transported by ambulance, remain in pain for prolonged periods after arrival.

Time-to-analgesia (from arrival/triage time) is one of the areas of current focus in the improvement of the quality of care in emergency departments. Studies have demonstrated that delayed and sub-therapeutic pain relief remains a problem, with a median of 58 minutes or more (up to 107 minutes for less urgent triage categories) for time-to-analgesia.

A range of strategies, including nurse-initiated analgesia, have been implemented in order to achieve the time-to-analgesia benchmark of 20 minutes.

Time-to-analgesia will be influenced by many factors, including the patient’s triage category. Patients in severe pain should be allocated triage category 2 (to be seen by a doctor within 10 minutes of arrival) in order to ensure analgesia is administered early. Alternatively, where nurse-initiated analgesia is available, patients in pain may be allocated lower triage categories, unless their condition requires otherwise.

THE APPROACH TO PAIN MANAGEMENT

Acute pain is a symptom, not a diagnosis.

While it is important to treat the pain, the cause should always be identified and treated.

Frequently the cause is obvious, such as acute appendicitis or trauma. Many times, however, the exact underlying aetiology is not clear and a diagnostic work-up is required. A history from the patient or a parent is essential to determine aetiology. The history and examination should cover the following items.

ESTABLISHING A PAIN MANAGEMENT PROCESS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Up to 70% of patients presenting to the emergency department have pain as part of their presenting complaint.

It is important to ensure that there is an efficient and effective process of patient care in the emergency department that includes a sub-process focusing on pain management.

In order to ensure rapid and adequate analgesia for patients presenting with pain, a process of pain assessment and management needs to be in place.

Key components of this process are:

The triage process and triage form (electronic and/or hard copy) should incorporate assessment of pain and allocation of a pain score in addition to prescribing and administering analgesia (and other essential medications), with provision for monitoring vital signs including the pain score and response to treatment.

ASSESSMENT OF PAIN

The assessment of pain with the allocation of a pain score should be considered as one of the seven vital signs.

Accurate assessment of severity and character of the pain and the individual’s response to it is essential in order to decide on the pain management required.

Analgesia is most effective when the patient’s medications are tailored to their requirements.

Different levels of distress from similar degrees of pain stem from variations in a range of factors including culture, ethnicity, environment, beliefs, perceptions of pain, religious beliefs, age, illness, duration of pain and associated symptoms.

Adequate pain assessment begins with the history and physical examination.

There are a range of factors that should be used in assessing the severity of pain and the response to treatment. These include:

A visual analogue scale (VAS) in centimetres may be used to evaluate the patient’s subjective sensation of pain (Figure 13.1).

Alternatively, a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain, see Table 13.1) has been demonstrated to correlate closely with the VAS in measuring pain, with the VAS and the NRS having almost identical minimum clinically significant differences.

Table 13.1 Suggested analgesia for acute pain in adults based on the VAS or NRS

Pain score Suggested analgesic
1–2 Paracetamol PO ii tabs
3–4 Paracetamol and codeine 8 mg PO ii tabs
5–7

8–10 Morphine IVI

Pain response is unique to each individual. A good guide to adequate analgesia is the dozing patient who opens the eyes when his or her name is called.

In the evaluation of acute pain, a difference in the VAS of < 20 mm is unlikely to be clinically significant.

Ongoing monitoring and assessment of pain severity should take place every 2 hours (more frequently where pain is a major feature of the patient’s condition), in addition to requests from the patient for analgesia, and every 8 hours once the pain is controlled.

It is useful to determine the type of pain the patient is experiencing as this can guide the selection of analgesics (more than one type of pain may be present). Pain may be one of three types: somatic, visceral or neuropathic.

THE RATIONAL USE OF ANALGESICS AND SEDATIVES

A large number of pharmacological agents exist, each with their own indications, contraindications, modes of action and routes of administration. In order to select the correct agent, an understanding of the principles that determine the use of analgesics and sedatives in the emergency department is required.

Always refer to the drug’s product information (PI) before prescribing or administration.

Pharmacological agents

Narcotics and opioid analgesics

Natural and synthetic opioids are the most commonly use analgesic agents in the emergency department. Opiates should be administered IV and titrated to desired effect. Onset of action is rapid. They may also be administered IM or subcutaneously (SC). Respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting are the most common side effects. Concurrent administration of an anti-emetic (such as metoclopramide) should be considered, except in children under 10 years of age because of the high incidence of extrapyramidal reactions. Supplemental oxygen and oximetry monitoring should be used in patients with cardiac and lung disease. Cardiac monitoring may also be necessary.

Opiates should not be withheld because of a perceived risk of addiction. The dangers of addiction have been exaggerated. Respiratory depression can be reversed by the opioid antagonist naloxone (0.8–2.0 mg IV repeated as necessary). Note: Naloxone has a short half-life compared with narcotic analgesics. Repeat doses may be required.

Morphine should be used in preference to pethidine because:

In fact, there is very little evidence supporting the continued use of pethidine.

Morphine releases histamine resulting in ‘morphine itch’, a distressing side effect that can be treated with H1 and H2 antagonists.

Tramadol is frequently used as an alternative to morphine and pethidine because it lacks their addictive properties. It can be administered orally, IMI or IVI. Dose reductions are required in patients with impaired hepatic or renal function. Look out for side effects and drug interactions.

LOCAL ANAESTHESIA

PAEDIATRIC ANALGESIA AND SEDATION

Children have an exaggerated response to painful stimuli. Adequate analgesia and sedation are essential in managing children in what to them is a terrifying environment. Verbal reassurance and parental assistance and distraction are important, though in most situations pharmacological intervention will be required. As with adults, the treating doctor must be adept in advanced airway management and life support.

The assessment of the degree of pain in children can be difficult.

Patients may have pain where communication is difficult or impossible, with physiological or behavioural clues the only indication of the pain. This is usually the case with children where behaviour and physiological responses (pulse rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure) can be useful.

Children as young as 5 years have been shown to be capable of using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Recently the usefulness of a coloured analogue scale (CAS) and a facial affective scale (FAS, see Figure 13.2) were assessed. Both scales have numerical values on the reverse side to assist in documenting the pain severity. Almost all children are easily able to use both the CAS and VAS. A visual analogue scale, facial affective scale or a colour analogue scale should be used in assessing and monitoring pain in children.

image

Figure 13.2 Facial affective scale to assist children in indicating the severity of their pain

Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA et al. Faces Pain Scale—Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain 2001; 93(2):173–183. Used with permission from IASP®. See http://www.painsourcebook.ca for instructions on use of the scale.

PATIENT DISCHARGE

Full recovery from the side effects of analgesia should take place prior to discharge (Box 13.1). Patients, or their parents in the case of children, should be given both verbal and written instructions (Box 13.2).

RECOMMENDED READING

American College of Emergency Physicians. Pain management in the emergency department. Online. Available: www.acep.org/practres.aspx?id+29596; 12 June 2008.

American Society of Anesthesiologists website. Available: http://www.asahq.org; 23 June 2008.

Australia and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) website. Available: http://www.anzca.edu.au; 12 June 2008.

Australian College for Emergency Medicine. Guidelines for implementation of the Australian triage scale in emergency departments. Online. Available: http://www.acem.org.au/oren/documents/triageguide.htm.

Australian Medicines Handbook 2008. Australian Medicines Handbook Pty Ltd, Adelaide, 2008.

Beggs S. Paediatric analgesia. Australian Prescriber. 2008;31:63-65.

Bijur P.E., Sliver W., Gallegher E.J. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1153-1157.

Bruckenthal P. Assessment of pain in the elderly patient. Clin Geriatr Med. 2008;24:213-236.

Forero R., Mohsin M., McCarthy S. Prevelance of morphine use and time to initial analgesia in an Australian emergency department. Emerg Med Australia. 2008;20:136-143.

Fry M., Holdgate A. Nurse-initiated intravenous morphine in the emergency department: efficacy, rate of adverse events and impact on time to analgesia. Emerg Med. 2002;14:249-254.

International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) website. Available: http://www.iasp-pain.org; 12 June 2008.

Kelly A.M. Setting the benchmark for research in the management of acute pain in emergency department. Emerg Med. 2001;13:57-60.

Little M. First aid for jellyfish stings: do we really know what we are doing? Emerg Med Australia. 2008;20:78-80.

McCleane G. Pain perception in elderly patients. Clin Geriatr Med. 2008;24:203-211.

National Guidelines Clearing House website. Available: http://www.guidelines.gov; 12 June 2008.

National Health and Medical Research Council website. Available: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications; 12 June 2008.

New South Wales Department of Health CIAP website. Available: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Reports. Pediatric procedural sedation. Part 1, Personnel, monitoring, and patient assessment. Part 2, Selecting an agent. 2007;12:5-6.

Priestly S.J., Taylor J., McAdam C.M., et al. Ketamine sedation for children in the emergency department. Emerg Med. 2001;13:82-90.

Smith H.S. Overview of pain management in older persons. Clin Geriatr Med. 2008;24:185-201.

The Children’s Hospital at Westmead Handbook. McGraw-Hill, Sydney, 2004.

Victorian Medical Postgraduate Foundation. Analgesic guidelines. Melbourne: Victorian Medical Postgraduate Foundation; 1995.

Wang N.E., Vlahos J. Pediatric procedural sedation: personnel, monitiring, and patient assessment. Part 1, Pediatric emergency medicine reports. Part 2, Selecting an Agent. 2007;12:5-6.