Pain

Published on 10/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1463 times

Chapter 10 Pain

Pain assessment

Physiology and treatment of pain

Specific drugs

NSAIDs

NSAIDs are analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic. Act to inhibit cyclo-oxygenase in the spinal cord and periphery to decrease prostanoid synthesis and diminish post-injury hyperalgesia at these sites. NSAIDs reversibly inhibit cyclo-oxygenase to reduce prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesis (Fig. 10.4). Type 1 cyclo-oxygenase (COX-1) is present in gastric mucosa to produce protective prostaglandins and modulates renal function and platelet adhesiveness. Type 2 cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2) is responsible for inflammatory prostaglandins. Drugs which inhibit only COX-2 (rofecoxib, parecoxib) cause fewer gastric, renal and haemorrhagic side-effects. NSAIDs also inhibit neutrophil activation by inflammatory mediators and act centrally on the thermoregulatory centre. There is minimal protein binding with subsequent large volume of distribution.

Not generally as effective as opioids for acute pain, but reduce opioid requirements by 30–50%. May be useful in day-case surgery to avoid opioids.

Side-effects

There is no evidence that i.m. or rectal preparations reduce risk of side-effects. Advice from the Committee on Safety of Medicines recommends using the lowest possible doses to reduce the risk of GI complications.

Guidelines for the Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the Perioperative Period

Royal College of Anaesthetists 1998

Opioids

Pharmacology. Protein binding is a major determinant of drug distribution. Albumin binds acidic drugs (e.g. morphine); α1 acid glycoprotein (AAG) binds basic drugs (e.g. fentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil). Neonatal albumin and AAG levels reach adult levels by 1 year.

Opioid receptors are found in high concentrations in the limbic system and spinal cord:

These opioid receptors have recently been reclassified by the International Union of Pharmacology (IUPHAR) as OP1 (δ), OP2 (κ) and OP3 (μ).

Actions

Routes of administration. Up to eightfold variation in minimum analgesic blood levels between patients. Therefore, no one regimen is suitable for all patients.

Oral. Delayed postoperative gastric emptying results in delayed absorption followed by large bolus absorbed when motility returns. May be of more use in the late postoperative period once bowel motility returns.

Nausea and vomiting prevent oral intake. Poor bioavailability because of first pass.

Sublingual. Systemic absorption avoids first pass. Dry mouth reduces absorption.

PR. Systemic absorption avoids first pass. Not affected by GI motility or nausea and vomiting. Slow absorption delays onset.

Transdermal. Rate of absorption ∝ lipid solubility. Reduced absorption with vasoconstriction.

Inhalational. Used for relieving symptoms of dyspnoea and postoperative pain. Some lost on expiration, widely variable absorption, nasal pruritis and cough limit its clinical application.

Intra-articular. Action via intra-articular opioid receptors.

Intranasal. Rapid onset of lipid-soluble drugs. Systemic absorption avoids first pass. Useful route for postoperative pain in children.

Subcutaneous. Useful for pain relief in children since small cannulae can be inserted with minimal distress. Use with continuous infusion or intermittent bolus.

Intramuscular. Pain of injection, erratic uptake if poor tissue perfusion, wide fluctuations in blood levels and thus degree of analgesia and side-effects. Often administered too infrequently if ‘prn’.

Intermittent intravenous injections. Avoids pain of injection but has similar problems to i.m. route. Needs 1:1 nursing care to monitor respiratory depression.

Continuous intravenous infusion. May need initial i.v. bolus dose since steady state takes five half-lives to establish. More stable blood levels, but risk of insidious onset of respiratory depression and obstructive apnoea greater than that with PCA.

Patient controlled analgesia (Fig. 10.5).

Route of choice. Less overall opioid requirements than other routes. Patient acts as feedback to prevent overdose. Patients do not have to wait after onset of pain to receive analgesia, and immediate administration gives patients a greater sense of control. Requires loading dose and correct settings of lockout time (5–10 min), dose per bolus (morphine 0.01–0.025 mg/kg) and maximum dose/hour. Suitable for most children over 5 years. Background dose increases risk of respiratory depression and does not affect total dose. Fentanyl PCA reduces pruritis compared with morphine and may also be more appropriate in renal failure. Less incidence of respiratory depression (0.1–0.8.%) when compared with i.m. opioid boluses (0.2–0.9%) or i.v. opioid infusion (1.7%). Patient concerns regarding addiction and overdose may limit effective use.

Intrathecal/extradural. Most effective when combined with local anaesthetics. Side-effects are common, especially pruritis. Respiratory depression up to 24 h.

Fentanyl Patches: Serious and Fatal Overdose from Dosing Errors, Accidental Exposure, and Inappropriate Use

MHRA Guidance 2007

Chronic pain

Defined as pain which persists past the time when healing is expected to be complete, usually more than 6 months.

Neuropathic pain is defined as: pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system. Covers a wide spectrum of clinical conditions:

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) is now classified by the International Association for the Study of Pain as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I, and when associated with nerve injury (i.e. causalgia) it is known as CRPS type II.

CRPS type I (RSD). A syndrome that usually follows an initiating noxious event, with spontaneous pain or allodynia/hyperalgesia occurring in a regional distribution and not limited to the territory of a single peripheral nerve. Results in continuous pain in a portion of an extremity (not involving nerve damage), associated with sympathetic hyperactivity.

Characterized by:

CRPS type II (causalgia – Greek: kausis = burning; algos = pain). Similar to RSD but associated with traumatic nerve injury. Onset may be delayed for several months. Commonest nerves are median, sciatic, tibial and ulnar.

Postoperative pain

In a UK study (Kuhn et al 1990), 93% of patients described their postoperative pain as moderate (53%) or very painful (40%). Attempts have therefore been made to improve pain services.

Anaesthesia Under Examination – The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief Services in England and Wales

Audit Commission 1997

Bibliography

www.aagbi.org/publications/guidelines/docs/epidanalg04.pdf. Reproduced with the kind permission of the Association of anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Bridges D., Thompson S., Rice A. Mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:12-26.

Carr D.B., Goudas L.C. Acute pain. Lancet. 1999;353:2051-2058.

Cervero F., Laird J.M.A. Visceral pain. Lancet. 1999;353:2145-2148.

Collett B.J. Chronic opioid therapy for non-cancer pain. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:133-143.

Dickenson A.H. Gate control theory of pain stands the test of time. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:755-756.

Freynhagen R., Bennett M.I. Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain. BMJ. 2009;339:391-395.

Gajraj N.M. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1720-1738.

Grass J.A. Patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:S44-S61.

Harden R. Complex regional pain syndrome. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:99-106.

Kharasch E. Perioperative COX-2 inhibitors: knowledge and challenges. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1-3.

Kidd B.L., Urban L.A. Mechanisms of inflammatory pain. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:3-11.

Kong V.K.F., Irwin M.G. Gabapentin: a multimodal perioperative drug? Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:775-786.

Kuhn S., Cooke S., Collins M., et al. Perceptions on pain relief after surgery. BMJ. 1990;300:1687-1690.

Lambert D.G. Capsaicin receptor antagonists: a promising new addition to the pain clinic. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:156-167.

Lynch L., Simpson K.H. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acute pain. BJA CEPD Rev. 2002;2:49-52.

Macintyre P.E. Safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:36-46.

Macrae W.A. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:77-86.

Maze M., Kamibayashi T. Clinical uses of α2 adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology. 2001;92:934-936.

McQuay H.J., Poon K.H., Derry S., et al. Acute pain: combination treatments and how we measure their efficacy. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:69-76.

Nikolajsen L., Jensen T.S. Phantom limb pain. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:107-116.

Nurmikko T.J., Eldridge P.R. Trigeminal neuralgia – pathophysiology, diagnosis and current treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:117. 132w

Petrenko A.B., Yamakura T., Baba H., et al. The role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in pain: a review. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1108-1116.

Royal College of Anaesthetists. Guidelines for the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the perioperative period. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 1998.

Royal College of Surgeons of England and Royal College of Anaesthetists. Commission on the Provision of Surgical Services, Report of the Working Party on Pain after Surgery. London: HMSO, 1990.

Stone M., Wheatley B. Patient-controlled analgesia. BJA CEPD Rev. 2002;2:79-82.

Walker S.M. Pain in children: recent advances and ongoing challenges. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:101-110.

White P.F. The role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of pain after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:577-585.World Health Organisation Pain Relief Ladder. http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/painladder/en.

Epidural and spinal anaesthesia

Anatomy

Spinal dura is continuous with the meningeal layer of the dura mater of the brain. Vertebral canal periosteum is continuous with the outer layer of the cerebral dura.

Boundaries of the epidural space are:

Epidural space contains dural sac, spinal nerve roots, spinal arteries, venous plexus, fat and lymphatics. It is widest in the mid-lumbar region (5–6 mm) and narrows cranially to 1.5–2 mm in the lower cervical spine. Veins are valveless; therefore fluid/air injected into vein passes to intracerebral vessels. Veins drain via azygous vein to IVC. Vena caval obstruction, e.g. pregnancy, distends veins. Intervertebral foramina smaller and calcified in the elderly; therefore smaller volumes of LA required.

Negative pressures in epidural space may be due to coning of the dura at the tip of the epidural needle, pressure transmitted from the thorax, drag of gut viscera on paravertebral spaces or differential growth of the subarachnoid space more than the spinal cord.

When supine, highest point on curve of spine is at L3; lowest point is at T6.

Indications for regional anaesthesia

Other advantages of regional anaesthesia

Yeager et al (1987) investigated 53 high-risk patients. One group had epidural with LA combined with light GA, while a second group had GA with high-dose fentanyl. Postoperative analgesia was given with i.m./i.v. opioids ± epidural. Those with epidural had significantly reduced postoperative complications, cardiovascular failure, infection and hospital costs.

Contraindications

Epidural

Ropivacaine

Hyperbaric (‘heavy’) ropivacaine has demonstrated better recovery profile when compared with ‘heavy’ bupivacaine. A more rapid regression of sensory and motor block, earlier mobilization and shorter time to first micturition were all demonstrated using doses more commonly employed for spinal anaesthesia.

Good Practice in the Management of Continuous Epidural Analgesia in the Hospital Setting

Royal College of Anaesthetists 2004

The potential complications of continuous epidural analgesia include:

Recommendations

Complications of spinal/epidural anaesthesia

Serious complications of central neuraxial block are rare. Incidence of death or paraplegia is reported as approximately 1:100 000.

Hypotension

Due to loss of tone in resistance and capacitance vessels, causing decreased venous return, vasodilatation and decreased cardiac output.

Block below sympathetic outflow tract (T1–L2) has no effect on BP. Hypotension is worse if cardioaccelerator fibres (T2–T4) are blocked, which removes the ability to compensate for other circulatory changes. Crystalloid preload has a variable effect on preventing hypotension following spinal anaesthesia. Fluids alone have been shown to be unable to maintain BP in 50% of patients, and ephedrine in 17%, but metaraminol maintained BP in all patients following spinal anaesthesia. If there is any delay in performing the regional block, much of the fluid preload is redistributed to the extracellular compartment, reducing any benefit of preloading. Fluids should therefore only be given after establishment of the block as the block evolves. Vagal overactivity may cause severe hypotension in some patients.

Hypotension following a regional block during pregnancy may be treated safely with small doses of ephedrine (3–6 mg) or phenylephrine (80–100 μg). The use of pure α-agonists at higher doses may be associated with reduced placental flow, despite an increased MAP. Hypotension following a combined spinal/extradural technique is less marked by rapid establishment of a low spinal block followed by careful extradural extension into higher segments. Ephedrine causes nausea more frequently when given as a bolus (36%), compared with an infusion (5%).

Headache

Postdural puncture headache is caused by loss of CSF through dural tear with loss of CSF cushion and traction on pain-sensitive intracranial structures. Occurs in 70–90% cases following accidental dural puncture with a Tuohy needle. Described by Bier in 1989 who suffered a severe postdural headache after an experiment on himself resulted in a dural tap. Traction above the tentorium is transmitted via the trigeminal nerve to the frontal region; traction below the tentorium is transmitted by the vagus to the occiput and neck. Incidence is not affected by posture following spinal. Incidence following spinal is reduced (0–2%) with small-gauge pencil point needles. Conversely, they are associated with an increase risk of neurological deficit because of contact with either the spinal cord or the nerve roots of the cauda equina. A new 26G spinal needle with a cutting point and a double bevel is associated with a higher fewer neurological symptoms than a 25G Whitacre needle epidural catheters introduced into the CSF following dural tap reduce incidence of headache, perhaps by a fibroblast reaction sealing the tear.

Dura usually seals spontaneously within 1 week, but in persisting cases may cause intracerebral haemorrhage, subdural haemorrhage and cranial nerve palsies. Bed rest and hydration may improve symptoms. Epidural saline infusion, i.v. caffeine and abdominal binders are also reported to reduce symptoms.

Other complications

Spinal abscess. Onset of fever and back pain over 1–3 days. CSF leucocytosis. Main risk factors are immune deficiency, spinal column disruption, and sepsis/bacteraemia. Requires early surgical drainage and high dose parenteral antibiotics.

Horner’s syndrome. Sympathetic blockade presumed due to tracking of LA.

Shivering. Reduced by warming i.v. solutions and adding fentanyl to the LA.

Urinary retention. Attributed to loss of bladder sensation but still occurs if sensation intact.

Gastrointestinal. Nausea and vomiting due to a central effect of LA. Dopaminergic stimulation by opioids. Loss of sympathetic inhibition results in small bowel contraction and expression of gut contents through a bowel perforation.

Foreign body. Breakage of catheter. Shearing of catheter if withdrawn back through the needle.

Prolonged labour. Most studies show an increased risk of instrumental delivery of LSCS.

Major Complications of Central Neuraxial Blocks (CNB)

Royal College of Anaesthetists 2009

The census phase produced a denominator of a little over 700 000 CNB. Of these, 46% were spinals and 41% epidurals, and 45% were performed for obstetric indications and 44% perioperative.

Interpretation of results

Bibliography

Ballantyne J.C. Does epidural analgesia improve surgical outcome? Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:4-6.

Cook T.M., Counsell D., Wildsmith J.A.W. on behalf of the Royal College of Anaesthetists Third National Audit Project: Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists,. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:179-190.

Grewal S., Hocking G., Wildsmith J.A.W. Epidural abscesses. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:292-302.

Guay J. The epidural test dose: a review. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:921-929.

Liu S.S., McDonald S.B. Current issues in spinal anesthesia. Anaesthesiology. 2001;94:888-906.

NICE. Ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the epidural space. Interventional procedure guidance, vol 249. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London, 2008. www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/IPG249Guidance.pdf.

Rao T.L., El-Etr A.A. Anticoagulation following placement of epidural and subarachnoid catheters: an evaluation of neurologic sequelae. Anesthesiology. 1981;55:618-620.

Rathmell J.P., Lair T.R., Nauman B. The role of intrathecal drugs in the treatment of acute pain. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:S30-S43.

Royal College of Anaesthetists. 3rd National Audit Project. Major complications of central neuraxial blocks. Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, 2009. www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/NAP3_Exec-summary.pdf.

Royal College of Anaesthetists, et al. Good practice in the management of continuous epidural analgesia in the hospital setting. Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, 2004. www.aagbi.org/publications/guidelines/docs/epidanalg04.pdf.

Sharpe P. Accidental dural puncture in obstetrics. BJA CEPD Rev. 2001;1:81-84.

Stone M., Wheatley B. Patient-controlled analgesia. BJA CEPD Rev. 2002;2:79-82.

Walker S.M., Goudas L.C., Cousins M.J., et al. Combination spinal analgesic chemotherapy: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:674-715.

Wheatley R.G., Schug S.A., Watson D. Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:47-61.

Whiteside J.B., Wildsmith J.A.W. Spinal anaesthesia: an update. Contin Educ Anaesth, Crit Care Pain. 2005;5:37-40.

Yeager M.P., Glass D.D., Neff R.K., et al. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in high-risk surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 1987;66:729-736.

Share this: