Orthopedic Emergencies

Published on 26/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1401 times

Chapter 47 Orthopedic Emergencies

4 What imaging studies are indicated when osteomyelitis is suspected?

Special considerations apply for neonatal, pelvic, and vertebral osteomyelitis and osteomyelitis acquired in a nonhematogenous fashion.

Gutierrez KM: Bone and joint infections. In Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober CG (eds): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Disease, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone, 2003, pp 467–474.

Kaplan SL: Osteomyelitis in children. Infect Dis Clin North Am 19:787–797, 2005.

5 Which organisms are commonly seen in osteomyelitis?

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common causative organism. Other common organisms include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Kingella kingae. In addition to Staphylococcus aureus, group B streptococci and enteric gram-negative organisms are important organisms to consider in neonates with osteomyelitis. Other special considerations include Neisseria gonorrhoeae in sexually active adolescents; anaerobes in cases associated with sinusitis, mastoiditis, or dental abscess; Serratia spp. and Aspergillus spp. in patients with granulomatous disease; coagulase-negative staphylococci in patients who have undergone medical procedures; Salmonella spp. and gram-negative enteric organisms in patients with hemoglobinopathies; Pseudomonas aeruginosa in puncture wounds to the foot; Bartonella henselae in kitten exposures; and Coxiella burnetii in cases of exposure to farm animals. Haemophilus influenzae type B is only rarely seen since the advent of the H. influenzae type B vaccine but remains a consideration in an unimmunized child.

The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is worthy of particular attention and concern. MRSA can be particularly virulent and is associated with multiple sites of bone involvement, myositis, pyomyositis, intraosseous, and subperiosteal abscess formation, pulmonary involvement, and vascular complications (such as deep vein thrombosis and septic pulmonary emboli). These patients may be quite ill and require admission to the intensive care unit.

Mycobacterial and fungal infections are rare causes of osteomyelitis.

Frank G, Mahoney HM, Eppes SC: Musculoskeletal infections in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 52:1083–1106, 2005.

Gutierrez KM: Bone and joint infections. In Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober CG (eds): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Disease, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone, 2003, pp 467–474.

Kaplan SL: Osteomyelitis in children. Infect Dis Clin North Am 19:787–797, 2005.

8 How is osteomyelitis treated?

Antibiotic treatment should be initiated as soon as appropriate cultures have been collected. Regardless of the patient’s age, treatment should address the likelihood of infection with Staphylococcus aureus. Given the increasing prevalence of MRSA in many communities, coverage of MRSA in particular is very important. Many MRSA isolates are susceptible to clindamycin. In children, adolescents, and infants over 2 months of age, clindamycin is a good choice for initial antimicrobial coverage. Isolate testing for inducible resistance to clindamycin should be performed, since isolates demonstrating inducible resistance may not respond to treatment. Vancomycin provides excellent coverage for MRSA. However, because of concerns about widespread use of vancomycin resulting in increasing antimicrobial resistance, it should be reserved for patients who are moderately to severely ill or who live in communities where significant resistance to clindamycin has been demonstrated. In infants younger than 2 months of age, additional antimicrobial coverage for Group B Streptococcus and enteric gram-negative becteria is important. In this age group clindamycin or vancomycin plus cefotaxime or gentamycin would be appropriate initial antimicrobial choices.

Special circumstances (noted in question 5) warrant consideration of antimicrobial coverage specific to the likely pathogens in such cases.

An orthopedic surgeon should be involved in cases of suspected or confirmed osteomyelitis. Surgical treatment is indicated in a number of circumstances. Moreover, surgical tissue is often helpful in identifying a causative organism to guide antimicrobial treatment.

Frank G, Mahoney HM, Eppes SC: Musculoskeletal infections in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 52:1083–1106, 2005.

Gutierrez K: Bone and joint infections in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 52:779–794, 2005.

Gutierrez KM: Bone and joint infections. In Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober CG (eds): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Disease, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone, 2003, pp 467–474.

Kaplan SL: Osteomyelitis in children. Infect Dis Clin North Am 19:787–797, 2005.

9 Describe the signs and symptoms of septic arthritis.

Pain and decreased use of the involved limb are common symptoms of septic arthritis. Hip, knee, and ankle joints account for about 80% of cases of septic arthritis. Fever, malaise, and anorexia are seen in most patients. The involved joint is often held in a position of comfort. In the knee this is usually flexion. In the hip it is usually flexion, abduction, and external rotation. Passive range of motion away from the position of comfort is resisted and is painful. In joints other than the hip, tenderness, swelling, warmth, and erythema are usually seen and an effusion may be palpable. As in osteomyelitis, neonates may present with pseudoparalysis and tenderness of the affected limb.

Other diagnoses to consider in the patient with suspected septic arthritis include traumatic joint pain, transient synovitis (“toxic synovitis”), reactive arthritis, Lyme arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, acute rheumatic fever, osteomyelitis, pyomyositis, necrotizing fasciitis, tumor, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Frank G, Mahoney HM, Eppes SC: Musculoskeletal infections in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 52:1083–1106, 2005.

Gutierrez KM: Infectious and inflammatory arthritis. In Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober CG (eds): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Disease, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone, 2003, pp 475–481.

Ross JJ: Septic arthritis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 19:799–817, 2005.

20 How do children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis present?

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) usually occurs during the rapid growth phase of adolescence and tends to occur more often in obese children. Males are affected almost twice as often as females. Black adolescents are affected about twice as often as white adolescents. SCFE may be chronic, acute, or acute superimposed on chronic in its presentation. Obesity is a risk factor in the development of SCFE. The presentation of SCFE is bilateral in approximately 20% of cases. Patients with SCFE will often have pain in the anterior hip, groin, medial thigh, or knee and will also demonstrate limitation of hip motion. Because SCFE can present with knee pain, the presence of knee pain in a child or adolescent mandates a thorough examination of the hip. Patients who are ambulatory have an antalgic gait with external rotation of the affected leg. Passive internal rotation of the hip is painful, and passive hip flexion is associated with compensatory external rotation.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Pediatrics. Rosemont, Illinois, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1996, pp 151–159.

Canale ST: Fractures and dislocations in children. In Canale ST (ed): Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 10th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby, 2003, pp 1481–1503.

Kienstra A; Macias C: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: www.uptodate.com

21 What is the approach to the patient with suspected SCFE in the ED?

Plain radiography is the first step in the evaluation of patients with suspected SCFE. Films show displacement of the femoral capital epiphysis from the metaphysis through the growth plate. If the slip is chronic, metaphyseal remodeling may be seen. The anteroposterior view often demonstrates the presence of the slip. A line drawn tangent to the superior femoral neck should intersect the lateral aspect of the femoral head (Klein’s line). In SCFE this line passes more lateral on the capital epiphysis. Cross-table lateral radiography of the hip can help define the extent of posterior epiphyseal displacement. A frog-leg view of the pelvis may reveal a subtle slip, however, movement of the hip for radiography should be avoided as it may cause further slippage. Although a slip may be symptomatic on one side only, it is often present bilaterally on plain radiography. Because as many as 40% of patients have slips bilaterally, comparing sides on plain films may give false reassurance and result in failure to diagnose both slips.

Once the diagnosis is strongly suspected, the patient should avoid weight-bearing and an urgent orthopedic consultation should be obtained.

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Pediatrics. Rosemont, Illinois, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1996, pp 151–159.

Canale ST: Fractures and dislocations in children. In Canale ST (ed): Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 10th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby, 2003, pp 1481–1503.