Organizing Pneumonia

Published on 29/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Pulmolory and Respiratory

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3806 times

Chapter 50 Organizing Pneumonia

Definition

Organizing pneumonia (OP) is a histopathologic diagnosis defined by a well-recognized pattern of changes underlying a characteristic clinical-pathologic entity. OP may occur in the absence of etiologic context, in which case it is known as cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP), or in association with a known causative agent or inflammatory disorder such as connective tissue disease, where it is called secondary organizing pneumonia.

Initially described as the specific histopathologic pattern resulting from organization of an inflammatory exudate in the lumen of alveoli of unresolved pneumonia, OP is characterized by intraalveolar buds of granulation tissue with fibroblasts and myofibroblasts intermixed with loose connective matrix (Figure 50-1). Similar lesions may be present within the lumen of the bronchioles—hence the formerly synonymous term bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia (“BOOP”). The latter designation has been abandoned, however, because OP (rather than bronchiolitis) is clearly the major lesion, and furthermore, use of the older term was a potential source of confusion between this entity and bronchiolitis with airflow obstruction occurring, for example, after lung or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although the condition is not strictly interstitial, COP is included in the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international consensus classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, because of its idiopathic nature and occasional similarities with interstitial pneumonias.

Pathogenesis

OP is a unique condition characterized by intraalveolar accumulation of intermixed fibroblasts and connective matrix, especially collagen, that is reversible with corticosteroids, in contrast with other presentations of pulmonary fibrosis and especially that of usual interstitial pneumonia or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

The first event of the sequence leading to the formation of intraalveolar buds is alveolar epithelial injury with necrosis of pneumocytes (especially type I) (Figure 50-2). The epithelial basal laminae are denuded and injured, resulting in formation of gaps. Capillary endothelial injury often is associated. The consequence of alveolar injury is flooding of the alveolar lumen by plasma proteins (permeability edema), including coagulation factors. The balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis is clearly tipped in favor of coagulation (especially because of decreased fibrinolysis), leading to accumulation of fibrin deposits that are soon populated by migratory inflammatory cells and fibroblasts.

Fibroblasts differentiate into myofibroblasts that organize and represent the predominant cell of fibroinflammatory buds. Inflammatory cells and fibrin are progressively replaced by aggregated fibroblasts/myofibroblasts intermixed with a loose connective matrix tissue rich in collagen (especially collagen III) and fibronectin. This process, resembling that of cutaneous wound healing, is similarly reversible, without significant sequelae. It is likely that the relative preservation of the alveolar basal laminae is crucial in determining the reversibility of the lesions. Although COP and secondary OP appear very similar, the microvascular density and the density of collagen fibers within intraalveolar air spaces may be higher in secondary OP than in COP.

Mouse models of intraluminal inflammation have been developed using reovirus infection to induce the histopathologic changes. Lesions similar to OP have been obtained by intranasal inoculation of moderate doses of virus only in a susceptible strain of mice (CBA/J), suggesting that genetic background may contribute to pathogenesis of the condition in mice. Alveolar macrophages and T lymphocytes were implicated in the disease process. Of interest, diffuse alveolar damage with hyaline membrane formation was obtained with the same animal model when higher doses of virus were used. These experimental studies suggest that the intensity of the initial epithelial injury and yet undetermined factors inherent to the host may influence the evolution to either OP or diffuse alveolar damage. Other animal models of OP have been developed in rats inoculated with bacteria and in pigs infected with a circovirus.

The cellular origin of fibroblasts that populate the distal air spaces is unclear. The respective contribution of proliferating lung fibroblasts, fibrocytes or bone marrow–derived fibroblasts, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition has not been evaluated in OP. The mechanism by which corticosteroids facilitate the rapid resolution of OP also is unclear. Several studies have highlighted some characteristics that distinguish the reversible fibrotic budding characteristic of OP from the uncontrolled process of accumulation of fibroblastic foci and collagen deposition seen in usual interstitial pneumonia, including a distinct pattern of expression of metalloproteases, the increased vascularity of fibrotic buds, and a lower apoptotic activity in granulation tissue. In addition, the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α receptor-1 and Fas by alveolar macrophages is higher in patients with OP than in control subjects or patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Overall, OP may be considered as a model of normal wound repair, contrasted with the uncontrolled aberrant repair and fibrosing process observed in usual interstitial pneumonia of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Clinical and Imaging Features

Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia

Imaging Features

The imaging features of COP may consist of a variety of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings, some of which are highly suggestive of the diagnosis. The most typical imaging pattern in COP consists of multiple patchy alveolar opacities (Figures 50-3 and 50-4). These usually are bilateral, with a subpleural distribution, and sometimes migratory (with attenuation or clearing in some areas and appearance of new opacities in others), ranging in density from ground glass to consolidation with air bronchogram, with no predominance in cranial versus caudal distribution. The size of the opacities may vary, ranging from 1 to 2 cm to involvement of an entire lobe. Consolidation at imaging corresponds pathologically with intraalveolar buds of granulation tissue within the distal air spaces, whereas areas of ground glass opacity reflect the cell infiltration of alveolar wall by inflammatory cells, with some OP changes in the distal air spaces. This imaging pattern with multiple patchy alveolar opacities, especially those of a migratory nature, is so characteristic of typical COP that it should immediately suggest the diagnosis. The main other consideration in the differential diagnosis at this stage is idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (in the latter, blood eosinophilia with cell counts usually greater than 1500/µL is present; conversely, nodules may be found more frequently in COP than in chronic eosinophilic pneumonia).

Patchy ground glass opacities frequently are observed, usually associated with consolidation. The reverse halo sign or atoll sign (Figure 50-5), consisting of a circular consolidation pattern (corresponding histopathologically to organizing pneumonia in the distal air spaces) surrounding an area of ground glass opacities (corresponding to alveolar wall inflammation), also is highly suggestive of the diagnosis, although not specific.

Another imaging pattern in COP is a solitary focal nodule or mass-like area of consolidation that may mimic lung carcinoma especially when associated with hypermetabolism on positron emission tomography. It commonly is located in the upper lobes and usually is asymptomatic. An air bronchogram may be present. Diagnosis often is obtained by surgical resection of the lesion in the suspicion of cancer. Solitary focal COP likely represents nonresolving infectious pneumonia in a number of cases.

The infiltrative (or progressive fibrotic) pattern of OP associates interstitial opacities, with small superimposed alveolar opacities on HRCT (with possible perilobular pattern consisting of bowed or polygonal opacities with poorly defined margins bordering the interlobular septa). Honeycombing is not present. Infiltrative or progressive COP may overlap on both histopathologic and imaging studies with idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), with uniform alveolar and interstitial cellular inflammation (with more or less fibrosis), with the possible presence of foci of organizing pneumonia. Such imaging presentation of OP seems to be particularly frequent in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (Figure 50-6).

Several less common imaging presentations of COP have been occasionally reported, including multiple nodules, cavitary opacities, perilobular opacities, centrilobular or peribronchovascular ill-defined nodules, bronchocentric areas of consolidation, and linear subpleural bands (Box 50-1). A few mediastinal lymphadenopathies are not rare in COP. Pleural effusion is uncommon.

Whereas mimics of COP with typical imaging features are few, mimics of COP presenting as nodules, masses, or infiltrative lung diseases are many (Box 50-2).

Secondary Organizing Pneumonia

Most cases of OP occur as a reaction pattern and are considered to represent secondary OP, resulting from a determined cause, often infectious or drug-associated, or occurring in the context of systemic disorders (e.g., connective tissue disease) or other specific conditions. The clinical, laboratory, and imaging features and outcome of secondary OP generally parallel those of COP, with minor differences reported that probably reflect the nature of the underlying disease (e.g., higher lymphocyte percentage on a differential bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] fluid cell count). A careful etiologic investigation is thus necessary in any patient presenting with OP without evident cause, and especially with relapsing OP. In most cases of secondary OP, corticosteroid treatment is effective.

Secondary Organizing Pneumonia of Known Cause

A histopathologic diagnosis of OP prompts a search for a number of potential underlying causes, including a variety of infectious agents (bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites) (Box 50-3). Diagnosis of the infection (which is no longer active at the time of OP) may be difficult and is based on the clinical history, a rise in antibody titers against the infectious agent, or occasionally direct identification of the infectious agent by use of specific stains and histopathologic analysis of the lung specimens.

Several drugs have been reported to cause OP (Box 50-4). All drugs taken in the weeks or months preceding onset of symptoms must be systematically recorded. Any drug suspected to be a cause of OP should be withdrawn if possible (and rechallenge should be avoided). The diagnosis of drug-induced OP may be difficult, however, because it has no specific clinical-radiologic presentation.

A recent study surprisingly identified aspiration of food and of other particulate matter as a frequent feature in patients with OP, suggesting that aspiration pneumonia may be a more frequent cause of OP than was previously suspected. Aspiration was suspected on clinical grounds in less than 10% of cases; however, predisposing factors for aspiration frequently were identified (e.g., esophageal or gastric causes, drug use, neurologic conditions). The presence of multinucleate giant cells, acute bronchopneumonia or bronchiolitis, and/or suppurative granulomas on a background of OP changes should therefore direct the pathologist to look for foreign material and particulate matter on the lung biopsy specimen, and should prompt the clinician to evaluate for possible aspiration.

Radiation therapy to the breast after resection for cancer may precipitate the development of OP, with an incidence of approximately 2.5% in treated women and a mean delay of approximately 3 to 6 months after the completion of irradiation. In contrast with radiation pneumonitis, the alveolar opacities of OP (often migratory) also may appear in nonirradiated areas of the lungs. The opacities respond well to corticosteroid treatment, but relapses are common when corticosteroids are reduced or stopped. Of interest, radiation therapy to the breast is followed by bilateral lymphocytic alveolitis seen on examination of BAL fluid, with development of OP in only a minority of patients. This observation suggests that a “second trigger” and/or genetic susceptibility may be necessary for OP to occur, in addition to radiation-primed lymphocytic alveolitis.

Diagnosis

A thorascopic lung biopsy is recommended for a definitive histopathologic diagnosis of OP, also ruling out other conditions that may mimic OP.

When nonspecific clinical manifestations associated with typical imaging features suggest the diagnosis of COP, fiberoptic bronchoscopy (which excludes any bronchial obstruction) with BAL is first necessary, and transbronchial biopsy may be contributive. The BAL fluid differential cell count in COP often shows a mixed pattern with increased levels of lymphocytes (20% to 40%), neutrophils (approximately 10%), and eosinophils (5%); some mast cells and plasma cells may be present. The transbronchial lung biopsy specimens may show typical buds of granulation tissue within alveoli. Infectious agents must be systematically searched for on BAL fluid preparations (and on transbronchial biopsy specimens by specific staining, if performed). The combination of a typical clinical-radiologic pattern and a mixed pattern on BAL fluid differential cell count is considered highly suggestive of OP (and of COP in the appropriate clinical context). A decreased ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ lymphocytes in BAL has been reported in COP.

OP is a nonspecific consequence of interstitial inflammation that may be present as an accessory finding in many disorders, including nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, organizing diffuse alveolar damage, aspiration pneumonia, vasculitides, distal obstruction of the airways, and occult aspiration pneumonia. Some histopathologic overlap may exist with chronic eosinophilic pneumonia or the OP-like variant of granulomatous polyangiitis (Wegener granulomatosis). Additional findings suggestive of another diagnosis in secondary OP include necrosis or microabscesses (seen in infectious processes and necrotizing vasculitis) and organic debris (as in occult aspiration pneumonia).

With transbronchial biopsy, the small size of specimens obtained by this method does not allow exclusion of other histopathologic patterns, so the findings should therefore be considered diagnostic of OP only in patients with a typical clinical-imaging profile. The sensitivity and specificity of transbronchial biopsy for the diagnosis of OP have not been rigorously evaluated. Core needle biopsy generally is safe and may be appropriate in a minority of patients with suspected OP, especially with focal consolidation at imaging. Videothorascopic lung biopsy remains the most appropriate procedure to obtain specimens of sufficient size both to make a definitive diagnosis of OP and to exclude other processes. When performed, the biopsy should be done before corticosteroids are initiated and should be planned in a preoperative discussion between the surgeon and the physician or a radiologist. Microbiologic analysis also may be performed on the lung specimen.

A reasonable alternative to lung biopsy is to proceed with appropriate management, to include presumptive treatment as indicated, in the absence of confirmation of the histopathologic pattern of OP. Although this approach commonly is used in clinical practice, it carries the risk of misdiagnosing alternative conditions that may mimic OP, including eosinophilic pneumonia, low-grade primary pulmonary lymphoma, and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (see Box 50-2). Only patients in whom typical findings on imaging studies (e.g., multiple patchy consolidation) are associated with compatible clinical and BAL features should be treated without biopsy; particular attention must be paid to any clue to an alternative diagnosis (e.g., peripheral blood and/or BAL fluid eosinophilia, suggestive microbiologic findings in BAL fluid). When pathologic investigation is not available or consists of only transbronchial biopsy, the diagnosis should be reconsidered whenever the observed clinical response is unusual (especially in case of incomplete response to corticosteroids or relapse despite more than 20 mg/day of oral prednisone).

As in other conditions among the group of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, the “gold standard” for diagnosis of OP is now the clinical-radiologic-pathologic approach, which effectively ensures that imaging and clinical data, as well as pathology data when available, are consistent with and specific for this entity. Although interobserver agreement for a clinically based diagnosis usually is fair to good, the multidisciplinary approach is particularly useful in cases with histopathologic features overlapping with those of eosinophilic pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, or diffuse alveolar damage. The clinical assessment must include a careful history and evaluation for the presence of comorbid diseases such as connective tissue disease (including formes frustes of connective tissue disease or undifferentiated connective tissue disease), cancer, thoracic radiotherapy for breast cancer, exposure to drugs, inflammatory bowel disease, aspiration, or less common conditions such as common variable immune deficiency (see Box 50-5). A final diagnosis of COP can be made only after all available data including findings on etiologic investigations have been reviewed in a dynamic process requiring close communication among the clinician, the radiologist, and the pathologist.

Treatment of Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia

Corticosteroid treatment is standard therapy for COP and results in rapid clinical and imaging improvement in typical cases. With institution of therapy, consolidation evolves to ground glass opacities and reticulation and eventually regresses completely within a month; the less frequent linear or reticular opacities may not resolve. The optimal doses and duration of treatment have not been established, and treatment should aim at the best balance between disease control and side effects. We start with prednisone, 0.75 mg/kg per day for 4 weeks, and then continue with progressively decreasing doses for a total duration of treatment of 24 weeks (Table 50-1). This regimen limits intense and prolonged corticosteroid treatment with ensuing risk of iatrogenic complications. Other treatment protocols with slower tapering of dosage have been proposed. Parenteral corticosteroid therapy at higher doses often is used as the initial treatment in patients with the progressive or fibrotic variant of COP. Cyclophosphamide or azathioprine may be used in patients whose clinical condition deteriorates despite corticosteroid therapy. Of note, spontaneous improvement has been reported in some cases of COP. Macrolides have been suggested for their antiinflammatory properties as an alternative option in patients who are intolerant to corticosteroids or who experience frequent relapses; however, the benefit initially observed in case reports is not confirmed with empirical routine use of these drugs. Secondary OP requires treatment of the underlying condition (connective tissue disease, infection) or withdrawal of the causative drug or exposure. Focal COP does not require corticosteroid therapy after surgical resection (performed for suspected lung cancer).

Table 50-1 Proposed Therapeutic Regimen for Typical Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia

Step Duration Prednisone Dosage
Treatment of Initial Episode
1 4 weeks 0.75 mg/kg/d
2 4 weeks 0.5 mg/kg/d
3 4 weeks 20 mg/d
4 6 weeks 10 mg/d
5 6 weeks 5 mg/d
Treatment of Relapse
1 12 weeks 20 mg/d
2 6 weeks 10 mg/d
3 6 weeks 5 mg/d

Most cases of typical COP with alveolar consolidation have a rapid and sometimes dramatic improvement with initiation of corticosteroid therapy, but a minority of patients will have persistent disease, especially those with reticulation on HRCT. Relapses are common (occurring in up to 60% of cases) on decreasing or after stopping treatment and may be treated with prednisone in doses of 20 mg per day given for 2 weeks and then progressively decreased. Relapses of the disease should prompt a search for a persisting cause of OP, especially drug intake. Relapses occurring with daily doses of more than 15 to 30 mg of prednisone (depending on body weight) should prompt extensive reappraisal of the diagnosis and further clinical-radiologic-pathologic consultation, especially when a large sample is not available for histopathologic analysis. The overall prognosis with typical COP is excellent.

Suggested Readings

American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:277–304.

Beasley MB, Franks TJ, Galvin JR, et al. Acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia: a histological pattern of lung injury and possible variant of diffuse alveolar damage. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:1064–1070.

Colby TV. Pathologic aspects of bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. Chest. 1992;102:38S–43S.

Cordier JF. Cryptogenic organising pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:422–446.

Cordier JF, Loire R, Brune J. Idiopathic bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. Definition of characteristic clinical profiles in a series of 16 patients. Chest. 1989;96:999–1004.

Costabel U, Teschler H, Guzman J. Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP): the cytological and immunocytological profile of bronchoalveolar lavage. Eur Respir J. 1992;5:791–797.

Crestani B, Valeyre D, Roden S, et al. Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia syndrome primed by radiation therapy to the breast. The Groupe d’Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladies “Orphelines” Pulmonaires (GERM“O”P). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1929–1935.

Davison AG, Heard BE, McAllister WAC, Turner-Warwick ME. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis. Q J Med. 1983;52:382–394.

Drakopanagiotakis F, Paschalaki K, Abu-Hijleh M, et al. Cryptogenic and secondary organizing pneumonia. Chest. 2011;139:893–900.

Epler GR, Colby TV, McLoud TC, et al. Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:152–158.

King TE. Organizing pneumonia. In: Schwarz MI, King TE. Interstitial lung disease. ed 5. Conn: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2011:981–984.

Lazor R, Vandevenne A, Pelletier A, et al. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. Characteristics of relapses in a series of 48 patients. The Groupe d’Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladles “Orphelines” Pulmonaires (GERM“O”P). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:571–577.

Lee JW, Lee KS, Lee HY, et al. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia: serial high-resolution CT findings in 22 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:916–922.

Lohr RH, Boland BJ, Douglas WW, et al. Organizing pneumonia. Features and prognosis of cryptogenic, secondary, and focal variants. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1323–1329.

Maldonado F, Daniels C, Hoffman EA, et al. Focal organizing pneumonia on surgical lung biopsy. Causes, clinicoradiologic features, and outcome. Chest. 2007;132:1579–1583.

Mukhopadhyay S, Katzenstein AL. Pulmonary disease due to aspiration of food and other particulate matter: a clinicopathologic study of 59 cases diagnosed on biopsy or resection specimen. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:752–759.

Peyrol S, Cordier JF, Grimaud JA. Intra-alveolar fibrosis of idiopathic bronchiolitis obliterans-organizing pneumonia. Cell-matrix patterns. Am J Pathol. 1990;137:155–170.

Vasu TS, Cavallazzi R, Ilirani A, et al. Clinical and radiologic distinction between secondary bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. Respir Care. 2009;54:1028–1032.