Odontogenic Infections

Published on 21/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Otolaryngology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3531 times

CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections

Odontogenic infections are among the most frequently encountered infections afflicting humans, the etiology of which is almost always a carious tooth or a tooth suffering from periodontal disease. The vast majority of these infections are minor and acute, and some even drain through the tooth socket, because they are primarily due to chronic periodontal disease. Consequently, there is considerable interest in periodontitis—a chronic inflammatory disease (and by definition a chronic low-grade infection due to a microbial biofilm) of the tooth-supporting structures—as a potential risk factor in the morbidity and mortality of systemic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and premature birth. Research is ongoing to delve more deeply into these relationships.1 Refer to the Suggested Readings for more information on periodontal disease. Another topic that frequently arises with reference to odontogenic infection is osteomyelitis, which is an inflammation of the cortical and cancellous bone. It can follow odontogenic infection that is not completely resolved and when appropriate attention is not paid to the jawbone itself on follow-up. Again, refer to the Suggested Readings for more information regarding osteomyelitis.

Odontogenic infections, whether acute or chronic, have been plaguing humanity for millennia, and there are many documented stories, engravings, artifacts, and the like to prove this point.2 A great deal of pain and suffering continues to be a scourge, especially in populations that neglect dental care, do not have access to dental care, or ignore professional advice on proper oral hygiene. Extraction of the offending tooth usually results in resolution of the infection, even without antibiotics. However, some of these minor tooth-related infections occasionally become more serious and potentially life threatening, especially in immunocompromised patients. The need for more aggressive surgical and medical care is usually necessary then to prevent more disastrous results.

This chapter discusses the more acute odontogenic infections, focusing on diagnosis, clinical and radiographic presentation, microbiology, and treatment and management. Emphasis is on the pathogenesis, especially for the nondental practitioner, to provide a clearer understanding and ensure effective treatment is provided.

Microbiology of Odontogenic Infections

Odontogenic infections are usually caused by normal endogenous flora. The mouth contains many microenvironments, allowing for colonization of many bacterial species. Once this environment is established, which varies with factors such as age, immune status, type of diet, and preferred environment, it can and does change over a lifetime. Table 12-1 lists many of the common “normal” aerobic, facultative, and anaerobic species of bacteria (several fungal species, viruses, and even protozoans can also be found in the “normal oral flora”). In most patients, these normal oral bacteria are the cause of most odontogenic infections. Other organisms can be implicated, however, if there is a compromised host or unusual oral environment, such as that found in chronic osteomyelitis. Facultative streptococci are the most numerous group of organisms in the oral cavity and members of the viridans group are the most abundant; these are classically based on their type of hemolysis on agar. Noticeably absent from these normal organisms are the staphylococci, although they are present in nearly every mouth, but in small numbers. Staphylococcus aureus, in particular, is much more common in the nose and throat, and may participate in mixed odontogenic infections. Gram-negative anaerobes comprise much of the rest of the mouth’s normal flora, and these organisms can increase in numbers, especially in patients with chronic periodontal disease.3

Table 12-1 Normal Mouth Flora

Aerobic Bacteria Anaerobic Bacteria
Gram-positive Cocci  
Streptococcus

Gram-negative Cocci   Neisseria Veillonella Gram-positive Bacilli   Diphtheroids Gram-negative Bacilli  

Adapted from Peterson LJ. Odontogenic infections. In: Cummings CW, ed. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Vol 2. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993:1199.

In a recent study describing the microbiology of head and neck infections of odontogenic origin by Rega and colleagues,4 the most common bacteria isolated were viridans streptococci, Prevotella, staphylococci, and Peptostreptococcus. This finding has been consistent for many years, even as name changes (especially for Bacteroides) have taken place to better reflect more recent genetic information.59

Based on the results of many studies in the literature and much clinical anecdotal evidence, two important conclusions can be drawn regarding the microbiology of odontogenic infections: First, almost all odontogenic infections are due to mixed flora. Peterson states that the average number of different organisms is five, but can be as great as 10 or more.10 Second, between one third and two thirds of these infections are primarily anaerobic,4,10 which probably has to do with the timing of obtaining the cultures.

The most commonly implicated organisms in mixed infections are viridans streptococci, Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Eubacterium, Prevotella, and Fusobacterium. Notably absent from this list are the enteric gram-negative cocci and rods, such as group D streptococci, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas, and Bacteroides fragilis, among others. This fact has profound implications for treatment when any of these non-normal organisms are cultured from an odontogenic infection.

The anaerobic bacteria seen in odontogenic infections are not usually acknowledged to be pathogenic themselves. The most commonly isolated anaerobe is probably Prevotella (Bacteroides). Entry of bacteria into deeper tissues to cause an infection is probably the result of invasive aerobic bacteria giving access through a necrotic dental pulp. The aerobes then serve as the initiators of the infection, preparing the local environment for anaerobic bacterial invasion and subsequent proliferation. The anaerobes then predominate because the reduction-oxidation potential favors anaerobic growth. The clinical picture is as follows: aerobic or facultative streptococci release exotoxins and lytic enzymes to cause a spreading cellulitis. As the infection progresses, a mixed streptococcal/anaerobic infection ensues. As the hypoxic state increases, the predominance of anaerobic bacteria becomes evident.

Implications of Microbiology for Antibiotic Therapy

For centuries, the primary treatment of odontogenic infections has been surgical, and it will continue to be so in the future. Endodontic therapy or extraction of the tooth, surgical drainage of the abscess, and release of pressure to improve vascularity are all fundamental in the management of these infections.

Antibiotics are a necessary adjunctive therapy in many of these infections to allow for faster and complete resolution. The choice of antibiotic should be based, at least initially, on the susceptibility of the organisms likely to be the cause of the infection. In an uncomplicated infection, an empirical choice can be made without the delay of obtaining a specimen for culture and sensitivity testing.

Two microbiologic factors must be kept in mind, however, when making this choice: first, the antibiotic must be effective against Streptococcus, because these bacteria are ubiquitous in odontogenic infections; second, the antibiotic should be effective against a wide range of anaerobes, because up to 90% of infections involve some of these bacteria. Fortunately, oral anaerobes are still very susceptible to available antibiotics.11,12

The following list summarizes the effectiveness of commonly used antibiotics for odontogenic infections:

The very effective drugs can be used with confidence empirically to treat most odontogenic infections. The effective and less effective drugs are less predictable and should not be used as first-line drugs unless allergy dictates their use or specific culture and sensitivity data are subsequently available. The drugs listed as not effective are not effective against either Streptococcus or anaerobes. They should only be used in specific circumstances when indicated by culture results and then in combination with a beta-lactam antibiotic.

In certain infections, other antibiotics may be used. Drugs such as ampicillin, ticarcillin, piperacillin, azlocillin, mezlocillin, moxalactam, third-generation cephalosporins, and chloramphenicol are generally reserved because of their greater toxicity, excess expense, or extended spectra. However, these may be useful in a life-threatening situation, in which case an infectious disease control agency may become involved with the care.

Regarding recommendations for antibiotics, first, it is most useful to use a bactericidal antibiotic rather than a bacteriostatic, if available. The advantages of a bactericidal antibiotic are (1) less reliance on host resistance, (2) killing of the bacteria by the antibiotic itself, (3) faster results, and (4) greater flexibility with dosage intervals.13 Second, use of the most narrow-spectrum antibiotic first should be considered to allow less opportunity for development of resistant strains. Third, the addition of metronidazole to a beta-lactam antibiotic can add a significant benefit in the treatment of odontogenic infections, especially those considered to be mostly anaerobic. As always, the treating clinician must follow the clinical course of the patient and make the appropriate adjustment in antibiotic therapy as circumstances warrant.1417

Direction of Spread of Infection

The direction of spread of the infection from the tooth apex depends on the path of least resistance, considering the thickness of the overlying cortical bone and the relationship of the bone’s site of perforation to the muscle attachment of the jaws.

If no treatment is instituted, the infection erodes through the thinnest, nearest cortical plate of bone and into the overlying soft tissues (Fig. 12-1). Fig. 12-1A shows the root apex to be nearest the labial cortex; Fig. 12-1B shows the root apex to be nearest the palatal plate; Fig. 12-1C is a clinical photograph of a patient with a lip swelling, reflecting Fig. 12-1A. Clinical experience reveals that in the maxilla, Fig. 12-1A, is more common in that generally the labial-buccal cortex is thinner. If the root apex is centrally located, the infection erodes through the thinnest bone first, that is, the path of least resistance.

Once the bone has been perforated, local muscle attachments determine the location of the soft tissue abscess (Fig. 12-2). The most common pathway for the abscess is through the labial or buccal bone, occlusal to the muscle attachments, resulting in a vestibular swelling (Fig. 12-3). The vestibular abscess is seen as a fluctuant swelling, literally a “pus pocket,” adjacent to the affected tooth or teeth. If no treatment is provided, this pouch of pus usually ruptures and a sinus tract or fistula is established. At this point, the patient’s pain is relieved and he or she may believe that all is okay, especially because there are few, if any, systemic symptoms. However, if the tooth continues to be neglected, one of several things can happen. Slowly over time the bone involvement with the abscess can increase with more dissolution, possibly involving adjacent teeth. The patient may develop the classic “gum boil” or parulis, which is the body’s attempt at healing the sinus tract with ever-increasing amounts of granulation tissue. Occasionally the tract becomes congested and the pain and swelling may briefly return, until the built-up pressure causes release and relief. This cycle may repeat many times. The one meaningful consequence of continued neglect is development of an osteomyelitis, which may be more severe and more difficult to eradicate. Another unusual possibility is development of an orocutaneous fistula, which is much more common when it occurs in a longstanding mandibular infection (Fig. 12-4).

image

Figure 12-4. A, Periapical radiograph of a patient with an abscess on a mandibular molar which shows a tract through the inferior border of the mandible. B, Patient with an orocutaneous fistula, which may result from a longstanding infection caused by a molar infection similar to that in A.

(From Goldberg MH, Topazian RG. Odontogenic infections and deep fascial space infections of dental origin, Figure 8-2. In: Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR, eds. Oral and Maxillofacial Infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002:162.)

If the infection perforates the bone above the muscle attachment (see Fig. 12-2, points 2, 4, and 5), fascial space involvement occurs. When this happens, the potential for more severe infection and more significant systemic symptoms becomes greater. A rare occurrence, in my experience, is an odontogenic infection creating a sinusitis, reflected in Fig. 12-2, point 6. The sinus membrane provides a modicum of protection to the spreading infection and allows the body’s defenses to “wall off” the abscess, most commonly.

As previously stated, once the infection extends beyond the local muscle attachments, fascial space involvement is possible. Spread of infection along these potential spaces is determined by the presence of loose connective tissue. Fasciae develop in planes covering musculature that is subjected to movement. Surrounding or separating muscles, fascial planes offer an anatomic roadmap for infection to develop from the superficial to deep tissues of the face and neck. It is important to remember that these are potential spaces until separated by pus, blood, or dissection. Other features of these spaces are:

It is my opinion that open incision and drainage is the best course of treatment for a fascial space infection, particularly when the mandibular spaces are involved. Although needle aspiration can remove pus, it usually delays recovery because dependent drainage is not accomplished and irrigation of the wound is not possible. Anaerobic bacteria can cause significant tissue destruction and this debris is better cleared with an open wound. Trismus also resolves more quickly and early return to function is a desirable end point. Clearly, clinical judgment and experience play a large role in this treatment decision.

Fascial Space Involvement

Maxillary Spaces

As previously stated, most maxillary tooth infections manifest as vestibular abscesses, more often on the labial-buccal surface, but occasionally on the palatal surface (especially if the palatal root of a maxillary molar is the cause). If the path of infection breaks out above the muscle attachments, then a space infection is possible. The two primary maxillary spaces that may be involved are the canine space and the buccal space.

The canine space becomes infected almost exclusively as a result of apical infection of the root of the maxillary canine tooth. The root must be long enough to ensure that the apex is superior to the insertion of the levator anguli oris muscle. The canine space is located between the anterior surface of the maxilla and the levator labii superioris. When infected, there is usually swelling lateral to the nose and loss of the ipsilateral nasolabial fold. Drainage is most often accomplished with an intraoral stab incision (Fig. 12-5).

image

Figure 12-5. Patient with a canine space abscess. Note the swelling and obliteration of the nasolabial fold.

(From Goldberg MH, Topazian RG. Odontogenic infections and deep fascial space infections of dental origin, Figure 8-9. In: Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR, eds. Oral and Maxillofacial Infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002:169.)

The buccal space becomes involved when the infection of maxillary molar teeth breaks out superior to the attachment of the buccinator muscle. The space itself lies between the buccinator muscle and the skin. All three maxillary molars (uncommon with the third molar) may cause infection in this space; rarely the premolar teeth do. It is an ovoid space, below the zygomatic arch and above the inferior border of the mandible. Infections in this space are dramatic in appearance and may cause trismus, although this is not a consistent finding and may be more of a limitation than actual muscle involvement. The buccal space may also be infected from the mandibular molar teeth, but this involvement is not common. Drainage can be intraoral, but dependent drainage is difficult to obtain. In longer standing buccal space infections, pointing usually occurs and an extraoral incision and drainage is necessary; unfortunately, this usually leaves a noticeable scar after healing (Fig. 12-6).

In addition to these two maxillary space involvements, maxillary odontogenic infections may ascend to cause orbital cellulitis or cavernous sinus thrombosis. These are rare complications in that most patients seek treatment before coming to these extremes. The clinical picture of both of these complications is similar regardless of cause. Early in the course, there is infraorbital edema due to blockage of lymph channels. Progression can then lead to significant swelling and redness of the eyelids, chemosis, and exophthalmos. Once the septum is breached, involvement of the orbital contents includes both vascular and neural components (Fig. 12-7).

Cavernous sinus thrombosis may also occur as a result of the superior spread of an odontogenic infection.19 Spread to the cavernous sinus is hematogenous and may occur along an anterior or a posterior route (Fig. 12-8), because orbital veins lack valves, permitting blood flow in either direction. This allows contaminated venous drainage into the cavernous sinus. Fortunately this is a rare occurrence and most causes of cavernous sinus thrombosis are nonodontogenic. Signs and symptoms are like those of orbital cellulitis,20 and are related to the structures in the cavernous sinus.

Mandibular Spaces

Again, most infected mandibular teeth manifest as vestibular abscesses, but these may advance to involve a variety of spaces. Three are designated as primary spaces: submental, sublingual, and submandibular; three are designated as secondary: masseteric, pterygomandibular, and temporal.

The primary spaces are those into which infection spreads directly from the teeth through bone. The submental space lies between the anterior bellies of the digastric muscles and between the mylohyoid muscle and the skin. This space is involved with infected mandibular incisors, whose roots are long enough to allow erosion apically to the attachment of the mentalis muscle. Isolated submental space infections are not common (Fig. 12-9).

The sublingual and submandibular spaces exit on the medial aspect of the mandible. They are usually involved because of lingual perforation of infection from the mandibular premolars and molars. The factor that determines whether the sublingual or submandibular space is involved is the location of the perforation relative to the mylohyoid muscle attachment (Fig. 12-10). If the location of the apex of the tooth is superior (premolars, first molar), the sublingual space is involved. Conversely, if the apices are inferior to the mylohyoid (second, third molar), the submandibular space is involved. However, the second molar may be sublingual or both, pending its root apex location.

The sublingual space is between the lingual oral mucosa and the mylohyoid muscle (Fig. 12-11). Its posterior boundary is open, so it communicates freely with the submandibular space and the secondary spaces located more posteriorly and superiorly. Clinically, there is little extraoral swelling, but there can be marked intraoral lingual swelling in the floor of the mouth, and if bilateral, the tongue will be elevated and swallowing becomes very difficult.

The submandibular space lies between the mylohyoid muscle and the skin (Fig. 12-12). Like the sublingual space, it has an open posterior boundary, so it can communicate easily with the secondary spaces as well. When this space becomes infected, the swelling begins at the inferior lateral border of the mandible and extends medially to the digastric area and posteriorly to the hyoid bone (Fig. 12-13). Clinically this is a large potential space and the patient is likely to ignore initial swelling; it will not be until the infection has progressed substantially that the patient will seek care.

If all three primary spaces bilaterally become infected, the infection is known as Ludwig’s angina. Ludwig’s angina, described by Wilhelm Friedrich von Ludwig in 1836,2 was not uncommon in the preantibiotic era and was a significant cause of death. It is characterized, even in the antibiotic era, as a rapid, bilateral gangrenous cellulitis of all three primary spaces. It can and usually does extend posteriorly to involve the secondary spaces. It causes gross swelling, elevation and displacement of the tongue, and tense brawny induration of the submandibular region superior to the hyoid bone (Fig. 12-14). There is usually minimal or no fluctuance because of the rapidity of the cellulitic process. The patient experiences severe trismus, drooling, inability to swallow, tachypnea, and dyspnea. Impending compromise of the airway produces marked anxiety. If not treated, the cellulitis can progress with alarming speed, producing upper airway obstruction and, ultimately, death. The usual cause is an odontogenic infection from a mandibular molar. Clearly virulent streptococci are involved, but ultimately, it is a mixed picture as usual.21,22

The three secondary spaces of the mandible are located posteriorly and superiorly to the tooth-bearing portion of the mandible in the angle-ramus area. They are called secondary spaces because they become infected by secondary spread of infection from other anterior spaces: buccal, sublingual, and submandibular. It is also not uncommon to cause infection in these secondary spaces by direct extension of the infection of the tissues surrounding a partially erupted third molar. The hallmark of infection in any or all of these secondary spaces of the mandible is trismus caused by muscle irritation and dysfunction due to the infection.

The masseteric space exists between the lateral aspect of the mandible and the masseter muscle (Fig. 12-15). This space is involved from posterior spread of a buccal space infection or from soft tissue infection around the third molar. When involved, the posteroinferior portion of the face swells, especially at the angle of the mandible (Fig. 12-16).

The pterygomandibular space (medial pterygoid space) lies between the medial aspect of the mandible and the medial pterygoid muscle (see Fig. 12-15). This space becomes involved from spread posteriorly of the sublingual and submandibular spaces and from soft tissue infection around the third molar. When this space is involved, there is little or no swelling extraorally, but there is significant trismus, a clue to the diagnosis.

The temporal space is posterior and superior to the masseteric (lateral) and pterygomandibular (medial) spaces (see Fig. 12-15). Bounded laterally by the temporalis fascia and medially by the skull, it is divided into two portions by the temporalis muscle: superficial and deep. Infection in these spaces is more uncommon, unless the infection is overwhelming. Involvement may occur occasionally with extension of a soft tissue infection around a maxillary third molar, in which case the infratemporal portion of this space may first become infected. This area is just the inferior portion of the temporal space and is contiguous with the deep compartment. Swelling is evident over the temporal area, and if the superficial compartment is singularly involved, the swelling can be dramatic.

Collectively, these three secondary spaces are known as the masticator space, since they are bounded by the muscles of mastication: masseter, medial pterygoid, and temporalis. These spaces communicate freely with one another, so it is most common to find multiple spaces involved in any one infection. Again, the singular diagnostic symptom of masticator space involvement is trismus (Fig. 12-17).

Cervical (Deep Neck) Spaces

Extension of odontogenic infection beyond the primary and secondary mandibular spaces is not common, again because most patients will have sought care prior to this happening. When it does occur, spread to the cervical or deep neck spaces may have serious, life-threatening sequelae. These sequelae may be the result of local complications, such as upper airway obstruction, or distant problems, such as mediastinitis.

Unfortunately, the deep neck spaces have a variety of names and descriptions, but three are relatively consistent throughout the literature: the lateral pharyngeal space, the retropharyngeal space, and the prevertebral space, or danger space No. 4. The layers of deep cervical fascia form and bind these three potential spaces.

The lateral pharyngeal space is classically described as having the shape of an inverted pyramid. The base is the skull base at the sphenoid bone, and the apex is at the hyoid bone. It is located between the medial pterygoid muscle laterally and the superior pharyngeal constrictor medially (Fig. 12-18). Anteriorly the boundary is the pterygomandibular raphe, around which it communicates with the spaces of the mandible. Posteromedially it extends to and is bounded by the prevertebral fascia and communicates freely with the retropharyngeal space. The styloid process and its attached muscles and fascia divide the lateral pharyngeal space into an anterior compartment, which contains muscles, and a posterior compartment, which contains the carotid sheath and cranial nerves.

When the lateral pharyngeal space is involved in an odontogenic infection, there is trismus, because there is extension from the mandibular secondary spaces. If it is severe, it may interfere with accurate diagnosis and treatment. Lateral neck swelling, especially beyond the angle of the mandible, is usually seen, and intraorally, the lateral pharyngeal wall, when visualized, bulges toward the midline. One can differentiate it from a primary peritonsillar abscess primarily because the latter rarely has significant trismus (Fig. 12-19).

Complications result from involvement of the lateral pharyngeal space. First, the odontogenic infection has become severe and may be progressing at a rapid rate. Second, direct effect of the infection on the contents of the space, particularly of the posterior compartment, can include thrombosis of the internal jugular vein, erosion into the carotid artery or its branches, and interference with cranial nerves IX to XII or the sympathetic chain. Third, the infection may progress to the retropharyngeal space.

The retropharyngeal space lies posteromedial to the lateral pharyngeal space. It is bounded anteriorly by the superior pharyngeal muscle and its investing fascia and posteriorly by the alar layer of prevertebral fascia (see Fig. 12-18). The space begins at the skull base and extends inferiorly to the level of C7 or T1, where the alar and buccopharyngeal layers of fascia fuse (Fig. 12-20), at the level of the posterosuperior mediastinum.

When the infection has extended into the retropharyngeal space, the situation is grave and requires immediate attention. Trismus is severe in essentially all patients at this stage and evaluation of the retropharyngeal space is best performed by evaluation of a lateral radiograph of the neck and a computed tomography (CT) scan, as long as time is not delayed in obtaining one. Average widths of the prevertebral tissues have been well established.23 The soft tissue shadow should be no more than 7 mm (average: 3.5 mm) at C2 and no more than 20 mm (average: 14 mm) at C6, that is, behind the trachea. The CT scan can be very valuable as well (Fig. 12-21).

Involvement of the retropharyngeal space may also include the prevertebral space, which is a potential space between the two layers of prevertebral fascia, the alar and prevertebral layers. It extends from the skull base inferiorly to the diaphragm. The space is also known as the danger space No. 4.24

With infection involvement of these deep neck spaces, the patient is seriously ill and is in grave danger of death. Three great potential complications exist: first, the upper airway is in danger of obstruction due to anterior displacement of the posterior pharyngeal wall into the oropharynx (see Fig. 12-21); second, spontaneous rupture of the abscess can result in aspiration, pneumonia, and asphyxiation or this rupture may be caused by attempts at insertion of an endotracheal tube to secure the airway; third, once the infection has gained access to the retropharyngeal spaces, the mediastinum may become infected also (see Fig. 12-20).

Management of Odontogenic Infections

The principles of treating odontogenic infections are no different from the principles of managing any other infection. These principles are reviewed in the context of treating odontogenic infections that are serious enough to warrant hospitalization. Experience and common sense should dictate that it is better for the patient to be treated in the hospital setting, when a space infection has developed. The initial step, however, in any treatment is the history and physical examination.

History and Physical Examination

A careful history is the essential first step in managing these patients. Focusing on the patient’s chief complaint will clue in the practitioner to the origin, extent, and severity of the presenting problem, such as history of tooth pain, presence or absence of fever, use of antibiotics, and any difficulty in opening the mouth or in swallowing. The initial assessment reveals the gravity of the illness, the need for hospitalization, and the possible urgent surgical intervention. Indications of possibly fatal infections are respiratory impairment, difficulty in swallowing, impaired vision and/or eye movement, lethargy, and a decreased level of consciousness. Toxicity is suggested by paleness, tachypnea and tachycardia, fever, shivering, and diaphoresis. Central nervous system impairment includes a decreased level of consciousness, evidence of meningeal irritation such as severe headache, stiff neck, and vomiting, eyelid edema, and ophthalmoplegia. The cardinal signs of inflammation are present to some degree in all patients with an odontogenic infection: rubor, calor, tumor, dolor, and loss of function. Their absence may indicate that the acute phase of infection is past and the infection is spreading to deeper tissues. It may also indicate that antibiotics are effective, but the overall examination of the patient is the key.

Fever is an important finding in a patient with an odontogenic infection, since elevation of the temperature represents systemic involvement by the infection. It is related to the release of endogenous pyrogen, interleukin-1, from inflammatory cells recruited by the body’s defense system to fight the infection. Clearly, there are many variables that affect the temperature, but those elevations less than 102° F probably do not harm the patient and may contribute to the defense because elevated temperatures enhance phagocytic activity. Careful consideration should be given to the measurement of the temperature, because oral readings may be erratic; in children, measuring temperature using the external auditory canal is preferable.

Recording the vital signs is an integral part of the examination. In addition to the temperature, the blood pressure, respiratory rate, and pulse can give clues to the extent of the systemic involvement as well. The pulse tends to increase 10 beats per minute for each 1° F of increased temperature, so tachycardia is important to recognize as a vital sign that accompanies fever in an infected patient.

The comprehensive examination should include a regional assessment with inspection, palpation, and percussion as warranted. It is advisable to begin extraorally by examining the skin of the face and neck for swelling, fluctuance, erythema, fistula formation, and crepitus; any lymphadenopathy should be noted. If trismus is present, this is a clue to space involvement and may limit the intraoral examination. Attention can then focus on the teeth and vestibules, noting caries, mobility, swellings, and purulent drainage. The floor of the mouth can be assessed for swelling, as well as the patient’s ability to swallow. Ophthalmologic examination should include an assessment of extraocular muscle function and any preseptal or postseptal edema.

Inflammatory swellings in the face of adults represent odontogenic infection until proven otherwise. In children, this is not necessarily the case because there are several more common causes such as gingivostomatitis, sinus infections, and skin infections.

After a thorough history and physical examination, the clinician should proceed with imaging studies. Experience and the evaluation of the physical examination indicate whether plain films, such as a panoramic radiograph, are sufficient for diagnosis and treatment. In general, CT scans are recommended in addition to plain radiography, if fascial space infections have spread to the orbit or neck.18

Airway Establishment

This is one of the most important considerations after admission of the patient. Fascial space involvement that can compromise the airway may be anterior, as in Ludwig’s angina, or posterior, as in a deep neck infection. In either case, rapid severe compromise of the airway may occur. The surgeon must be keenly aware of this fact, carefully and frequently evaluating airway status to prevent fatal obstruction, and be prepared to take the patient to the operating room on an urgent or emergent basis.

In the uncomplicated odontogenic infection that involves the spaces of the mandible unilaterally, airway problems are rarely seen. If they are seen, nasal endotracheal intubation is the method of choice for airway establishment, with fiberoptic assistance as needed, especially if the patient has significant trismus. Consideration should be given to leaving the endotracheal tube in place for 2 to 3 days to ensure that acute obstruction does not occur in the time shortly after surgical decompression of the infection. These patients also have some rebound edema associated with the incision and drainage procedure.

In patients with Ludwig’s angina, airway embarrassment is the primary cause of death. Once Ludwig’s angina is diagnosed, it is imperative that the patient be monitored frequently and carefully for airway problems. These patients cannot lie flat and have difficulty in swallowing. If the decision is made to establish an artificial airway early, intubation with fiberoptic assistance (or blind nasal technique) can be attempted. These procedures should be carried out on awake, unparalyzed patients. Administration of neuromuscular blocking agents is not warranted because their administration may cause airway loss that cannot be regained. These cases require that an experienced anesthesiologist be present. If the decision to establish an artificial airway is delayed or cannot be accomplished, a tracheostomy or a cricothyroidotomy followed by a tracheostomy is the only option. An unhurried approach with a local anesthetic is preferred.22

If the infection involving a retropharyngeal space abscess is diagnosed with a radiographically enlarged soft tissue image or CT image, an artificial airway must be seriously considered. If the patient has only mild trismus and the anesthesiologist believes that direct laryngoscopy is possible, an endotracheal tube is preferred. However, if the patient has moderate or severe trismus, a fiberoptically assisted intubation is required. The major concern in this situation is rupturing the abscess while attempting to pass the endotracheal tube into the trachea, even under fiberoptic control. If such a rupture occurs, there is good likelihood of aspiration of pus into the bronchial tree, with all of the attendant sequelae. If there is no surety, even with an experienced anesthesiologist, then a planned tracheostomy (or cricothyroidotomy followed by a tracheostomy) should be carried out.

Choice of Antibiotic

The drug of choice for odontogenic infections continues to be parenteral penicillin. Even for serious fascial space infections, including Ludwig’s angina,21 penicillin is preferred. Large doses of up to 20 million units daily for intravenous penicillin may be required for serious infections.

In the penicillin-allergic patient, clindamycin is the second drug of choice. It is quite effective against streptococci and anaerobes and has low toxicity. Although clindamycin may cause pseudomembranous colitis, it causes only about one third of the reported cases. (About one third of cases are caused by ampicillin/amoxicillin and one third by the cephalosporins.) The surgeon must be alert to this potential complication and prepared to treat it or to seek consultation. Metronidazole alone or in combination with penicillin is also a useful drug. It has minimal toxicity problems and is effective against anaerobes. Parenteral cephalosporins may be moderately useful. The first-generation cephalosporins have the same effects that penicillin does on the microbial population causing odontogenic infections. The second-generation drug cefoxitin is more active against the anaerobic bacteria but loses some of the antistreptococcal activity of the first-generation drugs. The third-generation cephalosporins are generally effective against anaerobes but also have decreased effectiveness against streptococci. Furthermore, they are expensive and have no clear additional benefit. Thus the second- and third-generation drugs are not highly desirable in most odontogenic infections. Ciprofloxacin and metronidazole in combination may be quite useful in the patient with a severe infection who has had an anaphylactoid reaction to penicillin.

In summary, high doses of parenteral antibiotics with a penicillin-like spectrum are usually effective in treating odontogenic infections. Specific culturing should be done for serious or nonresponsive infections and the results used accordingly.

Surgical Drainage and Decompression

Jaw Space Infections

If the infection spreads to one of the fascial spaces surrounding the maxilla or mandible as described earlier, the treatment needs to be more aggressive.

The initial step after obtaining a history and completing a clinical and radiographic examination is to make a decision as to whether hospitalization is necessary. This decision is based on the presence and amount of swelling, the nature of the swelling (soft and doughy, indurated, or fluctuant) and the state of the body’s defenses. Infections that appear as chronic abscesses, with or without an orocutaneous fistula present, without a major cellulitis component can be surgically drained in the office setting and the patient observed on an outpatient basis. Similarly, patients with early infections having a soft, doughy swelling and who are not yet dehydrated can be treated as outpatients with antibiotics and tooth extraction.

However, patients who have a moderately elevated temperature with an odontogenic cellulitis that is diffuse and indurated should be managed in the hospital setting. These are the patients who are dehydrated and have a significant amount of pain. Support of the host with hydration, intravenous antibiotics, and analgesics plays an important role in the overall therapy.

Surgical treatment should be considered early. If fluctuance is noted on the physical examination, the patient should be taken to the operating room and incision and drainage procedures performed. Aspiration of pus for aerobic and anaerobic cultures is accomplished first. Drainage of the canine and isolated sublingual spaces is usually performed with a transoral approach. After the incision is made, an exploration is carried out by blunt dissection to break up all loculation of pus, and the Penrose drains are inserted.

The buccal space can be drained transorally or extraorally, depending on the specific patient situation and the preference of the surgeon. Surgery from the mouth side is more difficult, with maintenance of dependent drainage becoming less predictable. Drainage from the cutaneous side is more likely if the infection has progressed to a “pointing area”; unfortunately, this leaves a scar.

The submental space is drained via a horizontal incision, which parallels the inferior border of the symphysis of the mandible (Fig. 12-22). The area between the anterior belly of the digastric muscles is explored posterior to the hyoid bone.

The buccal, submandibular, masseteric, pterygomandibular, and sublingual spaces can all be drained via a horizontal incision parallel and inferior to the angle of the mandible (see Fig. 12-22). An incision from as short as 0.5 cm to as long as 5 cm may be used. If the infection is a tense cellulitis that involves several mandibular spaces, a larger incision is indicated to relieve pressure. After the incision is made, blunt dissection is used to explore the involved spaces. The tip of the hemostat is advanced to hit bone at the inferior border of the mandible. It can then be directed laterally and medially. This medially directed exploration will allow for the medial pterygoid component (pterygomandibular space) to be drained, since it is the most commonly missed space. It can also be directed somewhat anteriorly to drain the submandibular space/sublingual space or a separate incision can be made more anteriorly at the inferior border. The inferior portion to the lateral pharyngeal space just medial to the pterygoid muscle can be explored by this approach as well. In severe infections, anterior (submental), posterior (submandibular), and superior (superficial temporal) incisions may all be required. Penrose drains are inserted to the extent of the dissection to facilitate drainage. Irrigation and suction catheters may be useful in more severe infections,25 because anaerobic bacteria cause significant tissue damage and this debris needs to be flushed out of the wound. In infections drained by multiple incisions, through-and-through drains should be used, because intraoral incisions can also be of value to ensure thorough treatment.

Resolution of these infections depends on several factors: conditions of host defenses, seriousness of the original infection, appropriateness of antibiotic therapy, and extensiveness of surgical exploration. Of these, a failure to perform adequate surgical drainage is most likely to occur, especially if the patient reaches a plateau and does not continue to progress as expected. It may be necessary to repeat CT scans to identify an additional loculation that was not drained at the initial surgery. In the patient with severe cellulitis, overlying induration may prevent the clinical diagnosis of an abscess formation, especially if the patient was taken to the operating room before any scanning. Again additional surgery may be necessary.26

Deep Neck Spaces

Involvement of the deep cervical spaces as a result of odontogenic infection is an uncommon but life-threatening event. A large proportion of these deep neck infections are the result of odontogenic infections that have spread from the primary and secondary spaces of the mandible, because mandibular molars are the likely etiology. When deep cervical involvement does occur, usually beginning in the submandibular space and extending through the pterygomandibular space, the major diagnostic goal is to determine whether the lateral pharyngeal and retropharyngeal spaces are involved. The clinical examination, radiography (using anteroposterior [AP], and lateral soft tissue views of the neck; see Fig. 12-21A), and CT (see Fig. 12-21B) may all be required to make the diagnosis. Lateral and AP neck radiographs and CT scans may reveal the presence of gas in the soft tissue as well as soft tissue swelling. The presence of gas in the tissue in this setting signifies an anaerobic infection and indicates immediate and aggressive surgical therapy, because not only does pus need to be drained, but a continuing necrotizing fasciitis is also a concern.

Initial treatment of a patient suspected of having a deep neck infection requires immediate hospitalization, host support, maintenance of airway, IV antibiotic therapy, and incision and drainage of the involved spaces. Early surgical exploration, even in the absence of palpable fluctuance, is likely to produce more rapid and complete resolution of the infection with minimal mortality. As noted earlier, an artificial airway in these patients must usually be established, earlier rather than later. There must be no hesitation in accomplishing the necessary maneuver, whether it is fiberoptic intubation or tracheostomy. Large doses of parenteral antibiotic therapy must be started immediately as well. Penicillin with metronidazole is the preferred combination; clindamycin is an adequate alternative. If doubt exists concerning the bacterial cause of the infection, gentamicin or a third-generation cephalosporin may be added; in addition, it may be helpful early in the admission to obtain an infectious disease consult, if time permits.

Medical management with antibiotic therapy and host defense support may be used initially without surgery; however, a rapidly progressing infection of the neck should be explored. If gas emphysema, a foul-smelling discharge, or other signs indicating anaerobic infection exist, the indication for surgical intervention increases. If the infection continues to progress rapidly despite aggressive antibiotic therapy, surgical drainage becomes mandatory. If fluctuance is noted, pus should be drained immediately.2729

Drainage of the lateral pharyngeal space is best accomplished by a combined transoral-extraoral approach. An incision is made lateral to the pterygomandibular raphe, and the space is explored by blunt dissection posterior and inferior to the angle of the mandible with a long Kelly hemostat. A skin incision is made over the clamp tip along the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (see Fig. 12-22). Loculations of pus are disrupted by blunt dissection with the hemostat and by finger pressure. Through-and-through drains are placed.

The retropharyngeal space can be drained through transoral incision through the posterior pharyngeal mucosa. If this approach is used, a cuffed endotracheal or tracheostomy tube must be in place to prevent any aspiration of pus. An extraoral incision along the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle will facilitate dependent drainage. The space is explored by blunt dissection between the carotid sheath and pharyngeal constrictor muscle. Deep drains are placed as usual.

When surgical treatment was the only method of therapy (before the antibiotic era), early and aggressive surgery was essential to treat these infections and for survival. However, it is important to realize that, although aggressive antibiotic therapy may reduce the need for extensive surgical exploration in many patients, antibiotics rarely replace the need for surgery completely.

If surgery is emergent or even urgent, attention will not be immediately on the evident malnutrition of the patient. It is important in the postoperative period, then, to focus on correction of any deficiencies in intravascular volume status, electrolyte imbalances, and nutritional compromises. Oral pain, trismus, and swelling can be overcome by the administration of enteral nutrition for several days after the surgical procedure.

CHAPTER 12 REFERENCES

1. Moutsopoulos NM, Madianos PN. Low-grade inflammation in chronic infectious diseases, paradigm of periodontal infections. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1088:251-264.

2. Goldberg MH, Topazian RG. Odontogenic infections and deep fascial space infections of dental origin. In: Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR, editors. Oral and Maxillofacial Infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002:158-187.

3. Schuster GS. Microbiology of the orofacial region. In: Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR, editors. Oral and Maxillofacial Infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002:30-42.

4. Rega AJ, Aziz SR, Ziccardi VB, et al. Microbiology and antibiotic sensitivities of head and neck space infections of odontogenic origin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1377-1380.

5. Riggio MP, Aga H, Murray CA, et al. Identification of bacteria associated with spreading odontogenic infections by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2007;103(5):610-617.

6. Huang TT, Tseng FY, Yeh TH, et al. Factors affecting the bacteriology of deep neck infections: a retrospective study of 128 patients. Acta Otolaryng. 2006;126(4):396-401.

7. Kuriyama T, Karasawa T, Nakagawa K, et al. Bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive cocci isolated form pus specimens of orofacial odontogenic infections. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2002;17(2):132-135.

8. Kuriyama T, Karasawa T, Nakagawa K, et al. Bacteriologic features and antimicrobial susceptibility in isolates from orofacial infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90(5):600-608.

9. Quayle AA, Russell C, Hearn B, et al. Organisms isolated from severe odontogenic soft tissue infections: their sensitivities to cefotetan and seven other antibiotics, and implications for therapy and prophylaxis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;25:34-44.

10. Peterson LJ. Odontogenic Infections. 2nd ed. Cummings CW, editor. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 2. St. Louis: Mosby. 1998:1354-1371.

11. Flynn TR, Shanti RM, Levi MH, et al. Severe odontogenic infections, part 1: prospective report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1093-1103.

12. Flynn TR, Shanti RM, Hayes C, et al. Severe odontogenic infections, part 2: prospective outcomes study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1104-1113.

13. Peterson LJ. Principles of surgical and antimicrobial infection management. In: Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR, editors. Oral and Maxillofacial Infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002:99-111.

14. Blandino G, Milazzo I, Fazio D, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and beta-lactamase production of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria isolated from pus specimens from orofacial infections. J Chemother. 2007;19(5):495-499.

15. Brook I. Treatment of anaerobic infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007;5(6):991-1006.

16. Wexter HM. Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(4):593-621.

17. Rush DE, Abdel-Haq N, Zhu JF, et al. Clindamycin versus Unasyn in the treatment of facial cellulitis of odontogenic origin in children. Clin Pediatr. 2007;46(2):154-159.

18. Carlson ER, Hudson JW. Odontogenic infections. 4th ed. Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA, et al, editors. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 2. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby. 2005:1544-1559.

19. Fielding AF, et al. Cavernous sinus thrombosis: report of a case. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;106:342.

20. Karlin RJ, Robinson WA. Septic cavernous sinus thrombosis. Ann Emerg Med. 1984;13:449.

21. Greenberg SL, et al. Surgical management of Ludwig’s angina. Aust N Z J Surg. 2007;77:540-543.

22. Ovassapian A, et al. Airway management in adult patients with deep neck infections: a case series and review of the literature. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:585-589.

23. Wholey MH, et al. The lateral roentgenogram of the neck. Radiology. 1958;71:350.

24. Grodensky M, Holyoke EA. The fascia and fascial spaces of the head, neck, and adjacent region. Am J Anat. 1938;63:367.

25. Flynn TR, Hoekstra CW, Lawrence FR, et al. The use of drains in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review and a new approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983;41:508.

26. Lazow SK, Kim D. Imaging head and neck infections. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2001;13:585-602.

27. Beck HJ, Salassa JR, McCaffrey TV, et al. Life-threatening soft tissue infections of the neck. Laryngoscope. 1984;94:354.

28. Dzyak WR, Zide MF. Diagnosis and treatment of lateral pharyngeal space infections. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42:243.

29. Haug RH, Picard V, Indresano AT, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of retropharyngeal abscess in adults. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28:34.