Ocular Examination

Published on 08/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Opthalmology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4433 times

1 Ocular Examination

VISUAL ACUITY

The measurement of visual acuity is the first essential part of any ocular examination and, although the examination technique is simple, the process being assessed is complex and requires the interaction of many factors, both physiological and psychological. Assessment of visual acuity requires the eye to detect the object and resolve it into its component parts. This information is then transmitted to the cerebral cortex where it is matched against existing memory shapes. The patient must then be able to communicate recognition of the object to the examiner. Physiologically, visual acuity measures the capability of the visual system to resolve a target; this is dependent on three main factors: the background illumination, the contrast of the target to the background and the angle that the target subtends at the nodal point of the eye.

In theory the eye has a maximal resolution of 1 minute of arc at the nodal point. In practice, young people normally have a better acuity than this at 20/15 (6/5) which corresponds to the spacing of individual cones in the foveola. Although visual acuity is primarily a function of cones the degree of visual processing in the retina must be considered and, in particular, the receptive fields of the retinal ganglion cells. In the foveola there is a 1:1 relationship of cones to ganglion cells but this increases rapidly more peripherally. There is an increasing loss of visual acuity with age so that in old age 20/30 (6/9) or even 20/40 (6/12) may be considered normal.

Although distance acuity is normally measured clinically near vision is in some ways more important in the daily life of the patient. Near vision is tested by reading test print of standardized sizes with the appropriate spectacle correction and good illumination. Factors of accommodation and magnification are important in the assessment of near vision and the correlation between distance acuity and near acuity is not always good. Patients with 20/60 (6/18) distance vision can often manage to read print of J3(N5) size, provided their macular function is normal. There appears to be a large redundancy of nerve fibres in the visual pathways: probably only approximately 15 per cent of the optic nerve fibres are actually required to be able to read 20/30 (6/9).

Table 1.1 shows the pathological and physiological factors that can limit visual acuity. This process can be influenced by physiological and pathological factors anywhere along this pathway.

Background illumination alters the level of retinal adaptation. Low levels of light stimulate the rod system; the receptor density and level of retinal integration of this system are less than that of the cones and consequently acuity is also low. At high levels of illumination the cone system is stimulated and acuity is maximal. To obtain the best visual acuity illumination should be in the optimal photopic range. Because of the effect of reduced retinal illumination from lens opacities in patients with cataract may be seeing in the mesopic to low photopic range where the acuity is proportional to background illumination. In these patients, an increase in the ambient lighting will give them better vision provided that light scattering by the cataract does not counter this.

MEASUREMENT OF VISUAL ACUITY

Visual acuity is usually measured at a distance of 6 metres (20 feet) to eliminate the contribution from accommodation. It should be performed on each eye in turn without and with full refractive correction. Acuity is usually measured at high contrast. The visual angle refers to the angle subtended by an object at the nodal point of the eye; it depends on the size and distance of the object from the eye. The normal limit of resolution is 1 minute of arc but some individuals see better than this possibly due to a finer cone mosaic, better image processing in the retina or cortex, or fewer optical aberrations.

TESTING ACUITY IN CHILDREN

Visual acuity assessment in children presents particular problems. Good results can be achieved only with time and patience and by selecting the right test for the age of the child. These include qualitative tests such as the child turning to fixate a face or light, suppression of optokinetic nystagmus following rotation or objecting to occlusion of one eye. While semiquantitative measurements are available, for instance picking up ‘hundreds and thousands’ sweets or following small balls quantitative tests are most informative. For infants forced-choice preferential looking or visual evoked potentials (VEPs) can be used; both give different results. Older verbal children can use picture cards (Cardiff cards, Kay’s pictures) and from the age of three may manage matching letter tests (e.g. the Sheridan–Gardiner test; see Ch. 18). Caution is necessary when using Snellen charts with single letters because of the phenomenon of ‘crowding’ – being able to see single letters more easily than rows of letters – which can overestimate true acuity.

PHYSIOLOGICAL LIMITATION OF ACUITY

The physiological limits of visual acuity are essentially set by the sources of error in the system uncorrectable by standard refraction. Light rays passing through the eye are degraded by inbuilt optical aberrations, thereby increasing the blur at the margins of the images. This loss in edge contrast reduces the resolving power of the visual system. Apart from refractive error (sphere and cylinder), the main optical factors are higher-order aberrations, chromatic aberration and diffraction. Glare disability is produced from forward light-scatter from the ocular media and opacities. It casts a veiling luminance over the macula, reducing image contrast. A good clinical example is posterior subcapsular cataract where acuity is relatively well preserved but the patient has a disabling glare in bright light.

WAVEFRONT ANALYSIS

Wavefront analysis plots the total optical aberration of the eye. The low-order aberrations of sphere and cylinder can be corrected by simple optics; higher-order aberrations cannot be corrected by routine refraction. These used to be referred to as ‘irregular astigmatism’ and, in the case of irregular corneal astigmatism, can be corrected only by wearing a contact lens. Wavefront analysis allows detailed analysis of these aberrations; it has become important in understanding patient dissatisfaction following refractive surgery and, by correcting aberrations, offers the possibility of supranormal vision. This has yet to be achieved.

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY

The eye can detect objects by responding to the differing levels of luminance between a target and its background. This is defined in terms of the maximum and minimum luminance at the detected edge.

image

Standard visual acuity tests measure acuity under high contrast conditions but do not tell us anything about visual performance under different circumstances such as driving at night or reading in poor light which are often more appropriate to daily life and cause clinical symptoms. It is thus possible for patients to retain good Snellen acuity but have reduced contrast sensitivity at lower levels of illumination. Contrast sensitivity testing is of particular importance in assessing the effect of refractive surgery on visual performance. It can be measured at either a fixed target size with varying contrast or over a range of target sizes (spatial frequencies) and contrast to derive a contrast sensitivity curve, which is an extremely useful way to assess overall visual performance. There are a number of different ways to test contrast sensitivity; they fall into two groups – either differentiating bars, stripes and gratings or, alternatively, letters against a background. Letter tests usually produce a better performance than gratings.

COLOUR VISION

The perception of colour arises from the different cone receptors that are maximally sensitive at three separate wavelengths: red (protan), green (deuteran) and blue (tritan). Light of different wavelengths stimulates each of the cone populations to a different degree so that colours within the visible spectrum arise from their own specific pattern of cone stimulation. Colour brightness (luminosity) and saturation (amount of white light present) are other properties detected by the eye that must be taken into account in colour testing. As colour vision depends on cones it is a property of photopic central vision.

ABNORMAL COLOUR VISION

Abnormal colour vision can either be congenital or acquired; acquired causes include macular and optic nerve damage. Kollner’s rule states that optic nerve disease tends to affect the red–green axis whereas macular damage affects the blue–yellow axis. There are many exceptions to this rule, such as glaucoma and autosomal dominant optic atrophy, which affect the blue–yellow axis; and Stargardt’s disease, which primarily affects the red–green axis. Patients who have abnormal cone populations are not able to match some colours visible to a patient with normal anatomy but have a normal ability within other spectral areas. The most common type of colour deficiency is anomalous trichromacy in which the person has three cone populations but is deficient in one of them. Thus with protanomaly the person is deficient in red cones and needs excess red to match yellow; deuteranomaly requires more green. Dichromats have only two cone systems and thus cannot distinguish certain colours. Protanopes have absence of red cones, deuteranopes green cones. These anomalies are transmitted on the X chromosome and affect about 7 per cent of Caucasian males. Tritanomaly is very rare. These patients have difficulty in distinguishing turquoise blues and greens or yellows and pinks from one another. Achromatopsia is the complete absence of cones. These patients can distinguish colour only in terms of brightness; they have photophobia and poor vision. All patients with congenital colour defects have normal fundi.

Several clinical tests exist for the assessment of colour vision. These include pseudoisochromatic test plates, hue-matching tests and anomaloscopes; the former are the quickest and easiest to use. The most common is the Ishihara test for red–green defects; other types are the Hardy–Ritcher–Rand (HRR) series or the City University System which have the important advantage of testing the blue–yellow axis as well as red–green. If pseudochromatic plates are to be used properly in testing cone function they must be viewed at 75 cm in controlled white light and luminance conditions with appropriate refractive correction. Hue-matching tests, such as the Farnsworth–Munsell test, are more accurate but more time consuming. Testing colour contrast sensitivity with computerized systems is a sensitive, reliable and valid research tool.

image

Fig. 1.24 This shows the normal result. Patients with congenital colour defects have difficulty in matching tiles along a particular axis.

Adapted from Pyman GA, Sanders L, Goldberg B. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. ©1979 Elsevier.

VISUAL FIELD TESTS

The visual field is the area in space perceived by the eye classically described by Traquair as ‘an island of vision in a sea of darkness’. The sensitivity (or threshold) for stimulus detection varies throughout the visual field and, in the absence of pathology, depends largely on the number and function of the ganglion cell receptive fields at any given point. Lines (isopters) connect points where a target of the same size and brightness is first perceived on kinetic perimetry, that is, points of equal retinal sensitivity. As with acuity and colour vision a person’s visual field is altered by background illumination as this affects retinal adaptation and receptor function.

MEASURING VISUAL FIELDS

Visual fields are assessed to localize lesions in the visual pathway, document their severity and measure progression with time. Qualitative or quantitative techniques can be used. Perimetry may be either kinetic or static, the latter manual or automated. Kinetic perimetry requires a moving target to be detected whereas static perimetry requires perception of a stationary target of varying brightness. Occasionally, a stationary target cannot be perceived whereas an equivalent moving one can; this is known as the Riddoch phenomenon. While kinetic fields have the advantage of producing a readily interpreted ‘map’ of isopters static fields produce numerical data at a set of predetermined points that can be handled statistically. Changes within the field can be followed more precisely and this has proven to be very useful in the management of glaucoma. Computer-assisted static perimetry, complex testing strategies and data analysis, such as comparison with age-matched controls and the calculation of reliability indices makes it easier to store and analyse sequential data in order to detect disease progression. A major advantage of computer automated over manual kinetic perimetry is that it is less operator dependent. Disadvantages relate to its complexity, a considerable patient learning curve, patient fatigue and normal fluctuations in this field over time.

The results of visual field testing depend on the stimulus used (size, colour, brightness) and the background illumination. It is therefore important to be aware of these values when comparing different field tests. Other factors that can affect test results include patient fixation and concentration, test duration, refractive errors (for the central field only), media opacity (e.g. cataract), miosis and objects accidentally obstructing the field (e.g. rim of glasses, upper lid).

image

Fig. 1.29 The most commonly used computer-assisted static perimeter is the Humphrey analyser, shown here. Static targets of fixed size but variable intensity are presented randomly at different retinal coordinates within a bowl perimeter of constant photopic background illumination (21.5 asb). These coordinates have been selected for their discriminatory potential in glaucoma. Fixation is automatically monitored and displayed on a television screen to the side. Throughout the procedure the software program checks and rechecks that fixation is maintained and scores how well the patient fixates. To test for false-positive results the stimulus is withheld when the machine audibly indicates stimulus presentation. False-negative findings are assessed by re-examining a number of tested areas with a suprathreshold stimulus. The duration of the test depends on the number of repetitions at each point and the speed of the patient’s response. To perform well the patient needs to be familiar with the test – a learning curve is often demonstrated. The Octopus machine is another computer-assisted static perimeter using a mesopic background illumination (4 asb).

Static field analysers measure the threshold intensity for stimulus detection at each point. The human eye needs about a 10 per cent increase in brightness to discern a stimulus against background luminance. The intensity of luminance of the target is measured in apostilbs and converted to a logarithmic scale (decibels). 1 log unit of retinal sensitivity is 10 dB, with a range from 0 to 40 dB. To measure threshold the Humphrey analyser increases the target luminance in 4-dB steps until detection and then decreases it by 2 dB to define the threshold. Values are given in decibels of attenuation and correspond to retinal sensitivity. Thus, the higher the value, the greater the attenuation of the stimulus and the more sensitive the retina. Full threshold testing is time consuming and difficult for some patients so a variety of faster test strategies exists. The most widely used is the SITA program (Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm). Suprathreshold programs can be used for screening. These detect variation from the age-matched norm and do not calculate absolute values at each point.

OCULAR EXAMINATION

CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY AND KERATOMETRY

Measurement of corneal curvature is essential for the fitting of contact lenses, assessment of the eye for refractive surgery, correction of excessive astigmatism and the correct calculation of intraocular lens power. It is also useful for monitoring corneal diseases such as keratoconus. Measurement is based on the principle that the anterior surface of the cornea acts as a convex mirror reflecting a small portion of incident light to form the first Purkinje image, which is visualized to form a map of isopteric power. It is important to realize that corneal topography simplifies corneal refraction as it assumes that refraction takes place at a single interface with a single refractive index. In reality, the anterior corneal surface has a curvature of +49D, the posterior surface of –6D, with variations in the refractive index across the corneal tissue layers. These factors become extremely important after laser refractive corneal surgery which changes all three parameters. This is the reason why standard biometry for intraocular lens calculation is unpredictable after laser surgery.

image

Fig. 1.38 Corneal curvature is routinely measured before cataract surgery to calculate intraocular lens power. Although this information can be obtained from detailed topography only the curvature of the central 3 mm of cornea is important for this and this can be obtained from a simplified topographic technique or by manual keratometry. The spherical power in the axis of the two regular meridians can easily be measured using a basic keratometer of which there are two types (Schiotz and Helmholtz). The former uses an object of varying size and the latter an image of varying size.

The Schiotz keratometer is essentially a microscope with a fixed working distance so that when the cornea is in focus the apparatus is a fixed distance from it. There are two illuminated objectives, green and red; these are mounted on a curved track to keep them equidistant from the cornea on either side of the central eyepiece. To prevent any relative movement of the images when viewing the cornea the instrument incorporates a doubling device so that both images move together. When the images (mires) of the two coloured objectives are seen on the cornea in apposition the endpoint has been reached and the corneal curvature can be read directly from a scale on the arms supporting the objectives. Alignment of the horizontal bars in the mires allows the axis of astigmatism to be increased and the corneal curvature in the other meridian to be measured by rotating the objectives through 90° around the axis of the telescope.

TONOMETRY

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is measured by tonometry. Most instruments use applanation (e.g. Goldmann, air puff), which works on the principle that a force required to flatten a given area of corneal apex will be proportional to the IOP that maintains the corneal curve. Indentation tonometry (e.g. Schiotz) measures the depth of deformation rather than the area involved, and has largely gone out of clinical use.

IMAGING THE GLOBE AND ORBIT

OPHTHALMOSCOPY

The direct ophthalmoscope is based on the principle that rays emanating from the retina of an emmetropic subject will be focused on the retina of an emmetropic observer. It consists of a light source directed on to the patient’s retina by a small angled mirror that has a transparent area to allow light reflected from the retina to be viewed. The image is erect and real. With an emmetropic subject and observer, it has a magnification of ×15, which arises from the 60D power of the patient’s eye (45D cornea + 15D lens) behaving as a loupe (60/4). The field of view is quite small at approximately 6½°. A set of lenses positioned in front of the examiner’s eye allows refractive errors of either patient or examiner to be corrected and has a range of powers from +30 to –30D. The lenses also allow the ophthalmoscope to be focused to view some anterior features such as media opacities. Filters can also be rotated in the path of the returning light rays, of which the green or ‘red-free’ filter is particularly useful for examining the retinal nerve fibre layer and small vessels. Indirect ophthalmoscopy has the advantage of a brighter light source, long working distance, stereopsis and a wide field of view, as well as allowing a dynamic assessment of vitreoretinal pathology. Its disadvantages are that the image is inverted and more skill is needed in its use. A wide variety of aspheric contact lenses is available for retinal examination and laser treatment; these have superseded the more traditional three-mirror fundus lens.

OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY (OCT)

OCT obtains images by using back scattering of light in a way analogous to ultrasound B scanning but as the wavelength of light is shorter the resolution is much higher. It uses a low-coherence infrared beam that is split into a probe beam incident on the retina and an external reference beam directed on to a mirror held at a known distance. The incident beam is reflected by different interfaces within the retina and retinal pigment epithelium but penetration of deeper tissues is very limited. The two reflected beams are then recombined and their interference is measured producing a depth-specific interference signal with a longitudinal resolution corresponding to depth and an amplitude corresponding to the tissue reflectivity at that point. The degree of reflectivity is displayed in false colour giving an ‘anatomical’ display. Cross-sectional imaging is achieved by combining a sequence of A-scan profiles across the retina, analogous to ultrasound B scans. OCT has become essential in the clinical evaluation of macular pathology such as macular holes, cystoid oedema, pigment epithelial detachment and preretinal membranes, and the demonstration of vitreous traction (see Ch. 12). It is less useful for investigation of subretinal pathology such as neovascular membranes. Future developments of OCT show great potential for measuring optic disc cupping and nerve fibre layer thickness in glaucoma. Recently a new OCT with a wavelength of 1310 mm has been developed for anterior segment imaging which is likely to be of great benefit in signing the anterior chamber for phakic intraocular lenses. This wavelength is reflected by transparent ocular tissues such as the cornea and lens.

ULTRASONOGRAPHY

Ultrasound is mainly used to visualize intraocular structures through opaque media or to measure intraocular dimensions for intraocular lens biometry or to assess tumour size. It can also be used to visualize some orbital structures but the technique is difficult and operator dependent. Ultrasound is reflected at changes in tissue density. Images of the eye can be obtained in one or two dimensions (A or B scan). A-scan images provide a linear view along one axis and are used to measure lengths within the eye; B-scan ultrasonography uses A scans placed together to form a two-dimensional picture. It is a rapid, easy method of imaging intraocular contents and also allows dynamic examination, for example, of retinal detachment. High-frequency probes (50 MHz) give much higher resolution but poor tissue penetration; they are very useful for imaging anterior chamber detail (see Ch. 7)

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI)

MRI is the imaging investigation of choice for orbital soft tissue disease, optic nerve pathology and combined orbital and intracranial pathology. Gadolinium can be given intravenously during MRI to highlight regions of breakdown of the blood–brain barrier. MRI does not subject the patient to ionizing radiation. In MRI, protons (hydrogen nuclei) in tissues are realigned when exposed to a short electromagnetic pulse but return to their original orientation and re-emit the absorbed energy when the pulse ends. This emission is detected, processed and displayed as a cross-sectional image of the tissue. The conventional MR image is derived mainly from protons in extracellular and intracellular water and fat. Protons in proteins or calcified tissue are tightly bound and do not contribute greatly to the image; for this reason, bony structures and calcification cannot be seen on MRI scans. If these changes, which are so important in orbital disease, need to be seen CT is required. A significant number of patients cannot tolerate MRI because of claustrophobia.

ELECTRICAL TESTS OF RETINAL FUNCTION

Electrophysiological examination provides objective data on visual pathway function. The main tests are electro-oculography (EOG) which examines the function of the retinal pigment epithelium and the interaction between it and the photoreceptors; electroretinography (ERG) which arises in the photoreceptors and inner nuclear layers of the retina and is the mass response of the retina to a full-field luminance stimulus; pattern electroretinography (PERG) which allows assessment of both macular and retinal ganglion cell function; and measurement of the visual evoked cortical potential (VEP) which assesses the optic nerve and intracranial visual pathways. Electrodiagnostic tests are useful in localizing and diagnosing both inherited and acquired retinal and visual pathway disorders and, where appropriate, in monitoring the efficacy of treatment. They can also assess visual function in eyes with opaque media and retinal function from drug toxicity. In addition, they are particularly valuable for diagnosing nonorganic visual loss. Dark adaptation and other psychophysical tests may be used in conjunction with electrophysiological tests. The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) has published minimum standards for electrodiagnostic testing and standardized recording and has greatly improved the communication of electrophysiological data.

ELECTRO-OCULOGRAPHY (EOG)

There is a standing potential within the eye of approximately 6 mV between the cornea and retina that arises from interactions in the retinal pigment epithelium. The cornea is positive in relation to the retina.

ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY

The ERG is the mass electrical response of the retina to a luminance stimulus, usually a brief light flash. Stimulation is delivered by a Ganzfeld bowl which provides uniform whole-field illumination as well as a diffuse background light for photopic adaptation. As the ERG is a mass response it remains normal when retinal dysfunction is confined to small areas; an eye with disease confined to the macula also has a normal ERG despite the high photoreceptor density of the macula. By varying the recording conditions selective defects can be demonstrated in the rod or cone systems and some information can be obtained about the location of the defect within the phototransduction pathway.

A standardized bright flash is given. The response to this flash under scotopic conditions with a fully dilated pupil, is the maximal or mixed response (see Fig. 1.64). This response, perhaps regarded by many as the ‘typical’ ERG is dominated by rod-driven activity. The initial negative component is known as the a-wave, approximately the first 10 ms of which reflects photoreceptor hyperpolarization; the A-wave slope reflects the kinetics of phototransduction. The larger positive B-wave which follows the A-wave is generated after phototransduction in relation to ‘ON’ bipolar cell depolarization. The oscillatory potentials, the small wavelets seen on the B-wave, probably relate to activity in the amacrine cells. When the standard flash is reduced by 2.5 log units a rod-specific response is obtained consisting purely of the inner nuclear derived B-wave; at these low luminance levels, even under scotopic adaptation, there is insufficient photoactivation to record an A-wave (see Fig 1.64).

The ISCEV standard rod-specific response is generally the most sensitive detector of rod system dysfunction. However, this response (the rod-specific B-wave) is generated in the inner nuclear layer and thus does not allow distinction between photoreceptor dysfunction and postphototransduction dys-function. This distinction is better seen in the bright-flash ERG response where significant a-wave reduction indicates photoreceptor dysfunction (see Fig. 1.65), such as occurs in genetically determined photoreceptor degenerations. If the site of dysfunction is postphototransduction there may be a normal a-wave with selective B-wave reduction (the so-called negative or electronegative waveform; see Fig. 1.65). Among the diseases that lead to a ‘negative’ ERG are X-linked congenital stationary night blindness, X-linked juvenile retinoschisis, central retinal artery occlusion and quinine toxicity.

Cone-specific ERGs are recorded when the retina is stimulated under conditions of photopic adaptation. This is done by increasing the background illumination to suppress the rods and using both single-flash and 30-Hz flicker stimulation. At 30 Hz the poor temporal resolution of the rod system, in addition to the presence of the rod-suppressing background, enables a cone-specific waveform to be recorded (see Fig. 1.64) illumination. It is a more sensitive measure of cone dysfunction but is generated at an inner retinal level. In contrast, the single-flash cone response gives better localization within the retina. Although there is a contribution of the hyperpolarizing (OFF) bipolar cells to shaping the photopic a-wave, the cone photoreceptors probably also contribute to the generation of this component. The cone b-wave reflects postphototransduction activity. There is no significant retinal ganglion cell contribution to the clinical (flash) ERG.

PATTERN ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY

The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) must be recorded using electrodes that do not alter the optics of the eye; contact lens electrodes are thus unsuitable. The patient views a reversing chequerboard or grating, similar to that used for the VEP, rather than a flash of light. The signal is of very low amplitude compared with the full-field ERG; computer averaging is essential and attention to detail is necessary to obtain satisfactory recordings. The normal PERG to a high-contrast chequerboard pattern consists of two main components: a prominent positive component the P50, followed by a larger negative component, the N95.

Recent work suggests that all of the N95 component and some but not all of P50, relates to ganglion cell function. The P50 component is almost invariably affected in macular disease and its amplitude serves as an objective assessment of macular function. With optic nerve disease the N95 is selectively affected as a result of retrograde axonal degeneration of the ganglion cells. Visual loss from maculopathy or optic neuropathy can therefore be distinguished.

VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL

The visual evoked potential (VEP) is the electrical response of the visual cortex to visual stimulation and is recorded using posteriorly situated scalp electrodes. It is extracted from the spontaneous higher-voltage background activity of the brain, the electroencephalogram, by using repetitive stimulation and computerized signal averaging. The VEP, like the PERG, varies with stimulus and recording parameters. The normal-pattern VEP response to a slowly (approximately 2 cycles per second) reversing black and white chequerboard in constant luminance contains a prominent positive peak at about 100 ms; this is known as P100 (see Fig. 1.64), and its amplitude and latency are measured. This pattern-reversal VEP is most commonly used in routine clinical practice.

VEPs can also be stimulated by pattern appearance (onset/offset), where a uniform grey background is replaced by a chequerboard of identical mean luminance or a diffuse flash stimulus. The flash VEP is useful when assessing uncooperative or unconscious patients and patients with VEPs of irregular pattern. It is usually less sensitive to disease than the pattern VEP and shows much greater interindividual variability. Within an individual, however, there is minimal interocular or inter-hemispheric asymmetry.

VEPs are particularly useful for detecting and diagnosing optic nerve disease. Optic nerve demyelination profoundly delays the VEP and this is almost invariable following a clinical episode of optic neuritis and may also be seen in subclinical disease. Ischaemic optic neuropathy tends to affect amplitude rather than latency. Although optic nerve disease often results in VEP delay, VEP delays also commonly occur with macular dysfunction so that the PERG may be needed to distinguish accurately between optic nerve and macular disease. The VEP can also be useful in the assessment of chiasmal function by comparing responses from the nasal and temporal hemifields. The VEP to both flash (in younger children) and pattern appearance (in older patients) is the investigation of choice in identifying the abnormal intracranial misrouting of albinism. VEPs also have a valuable role in the diagnosis of nonorganic visual loss, where they can objectively demonstrate normal function in the presence of symptoms that suggest otherwise.