OCT Interpretation

Published on 09/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Opthalmology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1847 times

2.1

OCT Interpretation

OCT interpretation can be both qualitative and quantitative. At present, in order to fully evaluate an OCT image, both are important.

Qualitative Interpretation

In qualitative interpretation, the clinician reviews individual line scans (B-scans) imaging the areas of interest in the retina and makes qualitative assessment of the presence or absence of pathology based on a knowledge of normal anatomy. B-scans can be rendered in a color-coded image or in a gray-scale image representing the reflectivity of the various layers. By comparing line scans performed over time, the course of the underlying disease and its response to treatment can be assessed.

When performing qualitative interpretation, it is important to be aware of the following issues:

Zones of line scans can be qualitatively described as hyper-reflective or hyporeflective, and demonstrate ‘shadowing’ or ‘reverse shadowing.’ Hyper-reflective areas reflect more light than normal for a given region. On the grey-scale image, they appear whiter than the surrounding areas. Examples include epiretinal membranes and hard exudates. Hyporeflective areas reflect less light than the surrounding areas. Areas with a higher fluid content, e.g. intraretinal cysts, are usually hyporeflective. Shadowing occurs when there is increased absorption of light compared to the surrounding tissue. This causes optical shadowing and decreased visualization of the outer tissues. Vitreous debris, larger retinal vessels, hard exudates and highly pigmented areas cause shadowing. Reverse shadowing occurs when there is loss/atrophy of pigmented tissue that allows excessive light to be transmitted through to the outer layers. The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is a major source of light absorption on OCT scanning, so atrophy of the RPE can cause reverse shadowing.

Quantitative Interpretation

Quantitative interpretation of OCT scans relies on the ability of the OCT software to distinguish the inner and outer margins of the retina or sub-layers (e.g. nerve fiber layer), referred to as segmentation, and accurately calculate retinal thickness and/or volume. Retinal thickness can then be compared to age-matched controls for assessment of normalcy, and monitored over time to judge the progression or regression of disease. Newer generation OCT software features the ability to register subsequent OCT scans so that measurements of retinal thickness are compared over the same area of the macula every time. These are usually presented as Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study grids or color-coded maps of retinal thickness.

When comparing quantitative OCT scans, it is important to compare scans obtained on the same machine, since different OCT machines draw the outer retinal boundary at different levels (inner segment–outer segment [IS-OS] photoreceptor junction, OS tips, RPE) and therefore may obtain different retinal thickness measurements on the same patient at the same visit.

The major drawback to quantitative assessment is that even in modern SD-OCT machines, quantitative scans are prone to artifacts. For example, the machine software may inaccurately identify the inner or outer retinal boundaries and the thickness measurement is therefore inaccurate. This is called software breakdown. Artifacts can induce errors in measurement making quantitative data inaccurate.