Neurosurgical emergencies

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1730 times

Chapter 15 Neurosurgical emergencies

This chapter covers the approach to the patient who presents with headache as well as the following topics:

Before examining each of these individually, it is instructive to consider some important concepts and principles that are relevant irrespective of the actual pathology involved.

GENERAL CONCEPTS

Headache

Headache is a common symptom of a neurosurgical emergency. It may also be a symptom of a life-threatening non-surgical emergency (e.g. meningitis) or a symptom of many other less serious disease processes (e.g. migraine) or a non-specific manifestation of a non-neurological process (e.g. any serious infection such as pneumonia, pyelonephritis).

As headache is a frequent complaint of patients presenting to the emergency department, the problem is to differentiate the patients who harbour a serious cause from those who do not. The fact that some conditions are relatively uncommon (e.g. incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage is about 12 cases per 100,000 per year) cannot be relied upon as these patients select emergency departments, either through referral from their primary doctor or self-referral.

Boxes 15.1 and 15.2 outline some criteria for computerised tomography (CT) scanning of both trauma and non-trauma patients, respectively. Further information regarding the features of different types of headaches is given under the heading of each specific diagnosis.

Features that indicate a headache is due to raised intracranial pressure are associated nausea and vomiting and headache worse on awakening in the morning and on lying down.

Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

The GCS is a widely accepted scale for assessing alterations to a patient’s level of consciousness. A score is given based on 3 components—eye opening, verbal response and motor response (see Table 15.1). In adults, the score achieved correlates well with the severity of the underlying condition. It is also useful for objectively following a patient’s progress. Maximum score is 15 and minimum is 3.

Table 15.1 Glasgow Coma Score

Eye opening Spontaneous 4
To voice 3
To pain 2
None 1
Best verbal response Alert 5
Confused 4
Inappropriate words only 3
Incomprehensible sounds 2
Nil 1
Best motor response Obeys commands 6
Localises pain 5
Withdraws to pain 4
Abnormal flexion 3
Abnormal extension 2
None 1

Management principles

The aims of treatment are to prevent any further brain injury, treat the underlying condition, minimise symptoms and optimise neurological and functional recovery. Emergency department management is concerned with the first three of these.

Airway, breathing and circulation

A patent airway is the first priority (see Chapter 2, ‘Securing the airway, ventilation and procedural sedation’). Simple manoeuvres to maintain patency may prevent secondary brain injury from hypoxia. Airway protection is also important—patients with a GCS of 8 or less will not be able to protect their airway from aspiration or maintain a patent airway and need intubation. Adequate ventilation is required to avoid hypoxia and hypercarbia. Treatment measures vary from oxygen therapy by mask to full mechanical ventilation if required. Adequate CPP relies in part on a normal blood pressure. Hypotension should therefore be treated with volume expansion.

TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI)

TBI is a common emergency. It is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Australia. Of all trauma-related deaths, TBI is a major factor in a significant proportion. Of those who survive TBI, some are left with neurological impairment that often requires lengthy rehabilitation and may result in inability to return to work. The social and financial costs of this morbidity are very high.

Classification and pathophysiology

There are different ways of classifying TBI. Each is useful in that there is some relationship to treatment and prognosis. Table 15.2 outlines a classification according to actual pathology of the injury. TBI can be classified according to severity based on GCS (GCS ≤ 8 = severe, GCS 9–13 = moderate, and GCS 14–15 = mild or minor).

Table 15.2 Pathological lesions seen in traumatic brain injury

Type of injury Lesion
Skull fractures Depressed
Base of skull
Linear
Cerebral contusion  
Haemorrhage Intracerebral
Subarachnoid
Subdural
Extradural
Diffuse axonal injury  

Clinical features

The severity of mechanism of injury, a history of loss of consciousness and the duration of loss of consciousness are important. Did the patient regain consciousness? The patient may be experiencing symptoms such as headache, nausea and vomiting. There may be amnesia concerning the events around the time of injury, or for a period before the injury (retrograde amnesia). Anterograde amnesia is the inability to remember information acquired since the injury. This often manifests as the patient asking the same questions over and over again. On examination, local head trauma (lacerations, haematomas) may be present. The GCS should be measured (Table 15.1). Focal neurological signs such as pupillary dilatation with or without hemiparesis with increased tone and reflexes indicate an uncal herniation syndrome requiring emergent management. Where there is significant increase in ICP, the Cushing reflex will lead to hypertension and bradycardia. Clues to a fractured skull base are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak from nose, bilateral periorbital bruising (raccoon eyes), CSF leak from the ear, haemotympanum and bruising behind the ear (Battles sign).

Management

A systematic trauma approach that identifies and prioritises injuries is mandatory. As outlined above under ‘General concepts’, this will allow immediate management of life-threatening problems such as airway obstruction, lack of airway protection, hypoxia, blood loss and hypotension, thus avoiding secondary brain injury. Specific management includes the following.

Surgical intervention

Surgery is required for drainage of extradural (see Figure 15.1) and subdural haematomas. This may be required emergently if they are causing mass effect with raised intracranial pressure. Supportive therapy is required for contusions, subarachnoid haemorrhage and diffuse axonal injury. Surgery is also required for depressed skull fracture. In severe head injuries, insertion of an intracranial pressure monitor and monitoring of intra-arterial blood pressure to direct therapy (see above) is aimed at reducing raised ICP. To maintain adequate cerebral blood flow, a CPP of above 70 is ideal.

NON-TRAUMATIC INTRACRANIAL HAEMORRHAGES

Subarachnoid haemorrhage

(See also Chapter 24, ‘Neurological emergencies’.)

Over the past three decades advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques have seen a reduction in chance of dying and an increase in the likelihood of a functional recovery from non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, the morbidity and mortality are still significant.

As a result of the initial haemorrhage, 50% of SAH patients either die or are permanently disabled. Another 25–35% die of a later haemorrhage if left untreated. The size of this latter group suffering repeat haemorrhages can be minimised if there is prompt diagnosis and treatment. Despite this, diagnosis of SAH is often missed or delayed.

In two-thirds of patients with SAH the source of bleeding is a rupture of a cerebral aneurysm. The commonest site is the anterior communicating artery.

In about 20% of patients no identifiable cause is found and a small number have an arteriovenous malformation (AVM). A family history of aneurysmal haemorrhage increases the patient’s risk of the same.

Investigations

Diagnosis of the bleed is usually by cerebral CT scan (see Figure 15.2). The ability of a cerebral CT to pick up a SAH degrades over time. If scanned with a third-generation CT scanner within the first 24 hours, 98% will be visible;3 however, by 1 week post-bleed only 50% are visible.

Because the consequences of missed diagnosis of SAH are very serious, a lumbar puncture (LP) should be performed in patients with a negative CT so that those with a false-negative CT can be picked up.

The LP should be examined for the presence of blood (either macroscopic or microscopic). If red blood cells are present, it is difficult to differentiate a traumatic tap from a subarachnoid haemorrhage. The CSF should be examined for breakdown products of red blood cells (oxyhaemoglobin and bilirubin) by CSF spectrophotometry. Oxyhaemoglobin takes 2 or more hours to develop, but bilirubin takes 12 hours to develop. A traumatic tap can give rise to oxyhaemoglobin only, but the presence of both bilirubin and oxyhaemoglobin peaks on spectrophotometry is suggestive of SAH.

Xanthochromia is the yellow appearance to the naked eye of the supernatant of the centrifuged CSF specimen. The yellow colour is due to the presence of bilirubin. Inspection of the CSF for xanthochromia is less reliable than measuring the bilirubin peak with CSF spectrophotometry. Therefore, CSF spectrophotometry should always be done when LP is performed to rule out SAH.

Because it does take 12 hours for red blood cells in CSF to break down to bilirubin, it is theoretically possible that performing an LP too soon after the occurrence of the haemorrhage may lead to false-negative LP.

Once a SAH is detected, further imaging is required to demonstrate the source of the bleed. This is done with either 4-vessel cerebral angiography or CT angiogram (Circle of Willis). The latter is a less invasive alternative that can identify aneurysms and AV malformations. It has a sensitivity of approximately 96% for aneurysms greater than 3 mm diameter.3 It has not replaced conventional cerebral angiography but is useful in investigating patients with high clinical suspicion of SAH but who have equivocal or negative CT and LP.

Other investigations in SAH include full blood count, prothrombin time (PT)/activated partial prothrombin time (APTT), electrolytes, urea, creatinine (EUC), liver function tests (LFTs), blood group and screen and chest X-ray.

EMERGENCY PRESENTATIONS OF SPACE-OCCUPYING LESIONS

A number of nontraumatic conditions can present to the emergency department with the acute effects of a space-occupying lesion (SOL). These include tumours (primary and secondary tumours). Subdural haematomas may occur without a definite history of trauma. Large cerebellar infarcts can be complicated by significant swelling, rapid increase in ICP and a herniation syndrome.

Investigations

Definitive diagnosis is usually by CT scan. Box 15.2 outlines the indications for CT in nontrauma patients in the emergency department.

VERTEBRAL COLUMN AND SPINAL CORD INJURIES

Vertebral column injury refers to injury of any of the bones, joints and ligaments that make up the vertebral column. This may or may not be associated with spinal cord injury, which refers to injury of the spinal cord itself and is associated with neurological deficit.

The types of trauma that are high risk for spinal injury include high-speed motor vehicle crashes (particularly if there has been ejection from the vehicle), diving injuries, rugby football injuries and falls. In the elderly, falls from the standing position can easily result in cervical spine injury, especially at the C2 level. In this latter group, the mortality is significantly higher than in younger patients.

Clinical assessment alone is often not adequate in defining vertebral column injuries and radiological assessment can be difficult, both in interpretation of films and detection of subtle abnormalities.

Clinical features

Assessment of presence of spinal cord injury

The neurological deficit can be classified according to function (motor, sensory or autonomic), its distribution (level and, in partial cord lesions, which part of the body is affected) and whether the loss of function is complete or incomplete.

An evaluation of motor tone, power and reflexes should be done. Initial screening sensory examination is with light touch or pin prick. If there is other evidence of neurological deficit, test temperature and proprioception (posterior column). When sensory loss is present, a sensory level below which sensation is lost can define the level of the injury. A working knowledge of the dermatomes of the body is required. It helps to remember that the junction of shoulder and neck is at C4, nipple at T4, umbilicus at T10, inguinal region at L1. When the patient is logrolled to examine the back, perianal and buttock sensory testing should be done, as well as assessment of anal tone. Sparing perianal sensation and anal tone may be evidence that the lesion is not complete and there may be some functional recovery.

Other clinical clues that suggest spinal cord injury are diaphragmatic breathing in high-mid to lower cervical spine injury (loss of intercostal power supplied by thoracic cord with intact diaphragm supplied by C4, C5 and C6). In males, priapism may be present due to loss of sympathetic tone. There may also be hypotension and bradycardia due to loss of sympathetic vascular tone. Other causes of shock from trauma (haemorrhage, pericardial tamponade and tension pneumothorax) must be ruled out.

Whether or not the cord lesion is complete or partial is obviously vital for prognosis. Complete lesions have total loss of all three modalities (motor, sensory and autonomic). Partial lesions can have some residual function in any of the modalities. There are some syndromes with typical patterns of deficit indicating injury to certain parts of the cord (Table 15.4).

It should also be remembered that, in patients with a vertebral column injury, between 5% and 7% will have a second injury.

Investigations

In patients who cannot be cleared clinically, radiological assessment should be done.

At a minimum, three views should be taken of the cervical spine. These are lateral, anteroposterior (AP) and odontoid peg (open-mouth) views. The sensitivities of each of these views for detecting a cervical spine injury are 85–90%, 1–2% and 5%, respectively. The lateral view must show down to the cervicothoracic junction (C7 and at least upper part of body of T1). If it does not, a swimmer’s view can be obtained to better show the cervicothoracic area. This view needs to show both the alignment and some detail of the C7/T1 area. For patients who have large shoulders and upper torsos, or who cannot physically be placed in the swimmer’s position (one shoulder abducted), a CT scan may be required to image the cervicothoracic junction.

Other films may be useful in certain situations. Oblique views of the cervical spine can be used to evaluate the facet joints on each side. They can also be used as an alternative to swimmer’s view in imaging the cervicothoracic junction. Flexion and extension views are indicated to detect instability in an otherwise normal cervical spine with symptoms. Recent literature has questioned the value of flexion and extension views in detecting injuries not already seen on plain films.

Accurate interpretation of plain cervical spine films can be difficult and less experienced doctors should check their interpretation with an emergency physician. Box 15.3 outlines a system for reviewing cervical spine X-rays. Abnormalities may be non-specific and simply draw attention to the need for further imaging. (See also the ‘plain X-ray views’ section under ‘Trauma’ in ‘Emergencies in the neck’ in Chapter 4, ‘Diagnostic imaging in emergency patients’)

Treatment

In the patient with multiple injuries, vertebral column and spinal cord injuries should be managed as part of a prioritised management plan that addresses other serious injuries in context (see Chapter 14 for general principles of trauma management). The consequences of injury to the spinal cord in a patient with an unstable vertebral column injury are of major life-changing significance for the patient. Precautions to prevent further injury to the cord should therefore be instituted from the beginning.

Immobilisation of vertebral column

Precautions to prevent movement of the vertebral column should be instituted until it has been cleared. Patient transfers should be carried out while maintaining the position of the vertebral column. In hospital, this means use of specialised lifting frames (e.g. Jordan frame) or techniques (e.g. logrolling, spinal lifting technique). In each of these manoeuvres, a designated person needs to maintain the position of the cervical spine.

Numerous orthoses are available to minimise vertebral column movements. There is no perfect splint that prevents all vertebral column movements, particularly in uncooperative patients. Cervical collars restrict but do not completely prevent cervical spine movement. Soft collars are very poor at preventing movement; hard collars are better. At a minimum, any patient with a suspected cervical spine fracture should wear a hard cervical collar and the techniques for transfer outlined above should be used. Additional immobilisation with ‘sandbags’ may be used. Imaging should be expedited, as prolonged periods in hard collars and lying supine without moving are uncomfortable and painful.

Airway management may be problematical. Mask ventilation has been shown to result in inadvertent neck extension. If intubation is required, in-line immobilisation of the cervical spine by a person designated purely for that role and intubation by an experienced operator during rapid sequence induction has been shown to be a safe technique.

High-dose corticosteroids

The use of early high-dose methylprednisolone is controversial. Evidence of a benefit is limited to one large, prospective placebo-controlled randomised study4 in which patients with cervical spine injury were treated with 24 hours of methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg bolus followed by 5.4 mg/kg/hour infusion). This failed to show any improvement in morbidity or mortality, but those treated within 8 hours showed a greater improvement in return of motor ability (5 points) and sensation (2–3 points) as measured on a 70-point scale at 6 weeks and 6 months.

The validity of this study has been questioned because of the methods of statistical analysis employed, the functional significance of the measured motor and sensory improvements is unclear, and the results have not been confirmed in other trials.5 The potential benefit must then be weighed up against the adverse risks of high-dose methylprednisolone.