NEUROREHABILITATION

Published on 10/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 3156 times

CHAPTER 106 NEUROREHABILITATION

This chapter provides an overview of the rehabilitation principles used to improve function and facilitate recovery in patients with neurological injury. Numerous and varied neurological conditions manifest unique impairments. Neurorehabilitation is a diverse topic. This chapter presents a systematic approach to evaluation and implementation of general rehabilitation interventions for neurological injury. The paradigms for treatment presented focus on spinal cord injury (SCI) and brain injury models, although the treatment approaches can be applied to the rehabilitation of patients with other disorders with similar neurological sequelae. Rehabilitation programs typically consist of two parts: (1) skilled therapeutic exercise, to maximize function, and (2) prescription and incorporation of specific adaptive equipment, to facilitate optimal function, mobility, and independence.

ASSESSMENT

Initial Evaluation

Successful implementation of any rehabilitation program starts with a comprehensive initial assessment of the primary neurological impairment and also a systematic evaluation of any other medical and musculoskeletal conditions that may affect the development and implementation of a patient’s rehabilitation program. For example, shoulder arthritis or rotator cuff pathology can significantly affect the rehabilitation of a brain-injured or spinal cord–injured patient with severe lower extremity weakness who requires good shoulder strength and mobility in order to transfer and use assistive devices. Likewise, advanced cardiopulmonary disease may impair a patient’s ability to engage in aggressive gait training, in view of the aerobic demands of this activity. The initial rehabilitation evaluation should include an assessment of alertness, cognitive function, speech and language, vision, swallowing difficulties, musculoskeletal limitations, motor impairments, apraxia, sensory deficits, bowel function, bladder function, balance, and coordination.

Numerous disease states can cause injury to the spinal cord, including trauma, spondylosis, demyelinating diseases, tumor, neurodegenerative diseases, infection, vascular injury, and toxic metabolic disorders. There are approximately 11,000 new cases of traumatic SCI per year in the United States.1 About 700,000 people suffer a stroke each year, and stroke is currently the leading cause of serious long-term disability in the United States.2 However, numerous other disorders of brain function cause significant disability, and these patients may also benefit from directed rehabilitation therapies. Examples include encephalopathies, neurodegenerative diseases, hydrocephalus, demyelinating disease, and primary and metastatic brain malignancies. Many different types of rehabilitation programs are available for patients and are stratified in Table 106-1 according to level of medical acuity (the need for close medical supervision or nursing services) and intensity.

TABLE 106-1 Classification of Rehabilitation Programs

Program Medical Acuity* Hours of Rehabilitation
Acute inpatient rehabilitation High 3 (minimum/day)
Day therapy (outpatient) Low-moderate 3-5 (usually 5 days/week)
Subacute rehabilitation Moderate 1-3 (usually 3-5 days/week)
Home therapy Low 1 (usually 2-3 times/week)
Outpatient therapy Low 1-2 (usually 2-3 times/week)
Extended care facility Moderate 1 (usually 2-3 times/week)

* The need for close medical supervision or nursing services.

Assessment Scales

SCI assessment starts with a determination of the level and the completeness of the spinal injury. The American Spinal Injury Association has published standards for classification of SCI level (Fig. 106-1) and a grading system for completeness of neurological injury (Fig. 106-2).3 Incomplete injuries have a much better prognosis for motor recovery than do complete injuries. Since 2000, the most frequent SCI neurological category at rehabilitation hospital discharge of persons reported to the National Spinal Cord Injury database is incomplete tetraplegia (34.3%), followed by complete paraplegia (25.1%), complete tetraplegia (22.1%), and incomplete paraplegia (17.5%).1

A variety of scales and assessment tools exist for evaluation of function after neurological injury. The primary initial assessment scale administered in traumatic brain injury is the Glasgow Coma Scale. The Glasgow Coma Scale numerical score reflects the depth of unconsciousness and is one of the most significant initial predictors of outcome and recovery.4 Table 106-2 summarizes some of the more commonly used scales in rehabilitation medicine. The Functional Independence Measure instrument is probably the most widely used functional assessment tool in the inpatient rehabilitation setting and can be applied irrespective of diagnosis (Fig. 106-3).

TABLE 106-2 Commonly Used Assessment Scales

Scale Type Scale Name
Spinal cord injury impairment ASIA Impairment Scale
Stroke deficit NIH Stroke Scale
Canadian Neurologic Scale
Level of consciousness/cognitive function Glasgow Coma Scale
(Ranchos) Level of Cognitive Function Scale
Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test
Motor function Fugl-Meyer Scale
Spasticity Modified Ashworth Scale
Basic ADLs and mobility Barthel Index
Functional Independence Measure
Instrumental ADLs Lawton & Brody Instrumental ADL Scale
Katz ADL Scale
Depression Beck Depression Scale
Hamilton Depression Scale
Quality of life Sickness Impact Profile
Health status Short-Form 36

ADL, activity of daily living; ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; NIH, National Institutes of Health.

ACUTE ILLNESS REHABILITION

Rehabilitation protocols should begin immediately after neurological injury, even if the patient is critically ill. One of the main goals is to minimize the effects of prolonged immobility that can be associated with severe neurological injury. In addition, quick identification of other body systems that may have been adversely affected facilitates immediate implementation of treatment schemes and thus minimizes the potential for morbidity. Table 106-3 outlines the various areas that require assessment.

TABLE 106-3 Acute Illness Rehabilitation Principles

Rehabilitation Measure Principle
Musculoskeletal Prevention of contractures with range-of-motion exercise, stretching, positioning, splints, and footboards
Pulmonary Incentive spirometry, chest percussive therapy, pulmonary toilet
Swallowing Bedside or video swallowing evaluation to assess aspiration risk
Skin Frequent repositioning (every 2 hours), padding of bony prominences, pressure-reducing mattresses, and specialized beds
Bowl Assessment of continence, constipation, neurogenic bowl
Bladder Assessment of continence, check for infection, implementation of indwelling or intermittent catheterization
DVT prophylaxis Subcutaneous heparin, sequential leg compression devices, compression garments, encouraging mobility and active calf exercises
Confusion Reducing sedating medications, installing restraints or net bed for patient safety

DVT, deep vein thrombosis.

FUNDAMENTAL REHABILITATION INTERVENTIONS

Strengthening

Weakness is a common sequela of neurological injury. Institution of strengthening programs can typically start as soon as the patient has the ability to perform voluntary motor contractions. Often, neuromuscular reeducation techniques are used concomitantly with strengthening programs to facilitate more coordinated return of motor function (see later discussion). A general approach to strengthening starts with focus on core muscles that support the trunk, spine, pelvic girdle, and shoulder girdle. As core strength improves, greater focus is placed on extremity strength training and on coordination of motor control.

In the profoundly debilitated patient who is unable to maintain trunk stability in an upright position, assisted range-of-motion exercises and progressive resistance exercises, with the therapist providing the assistance or resistance, can be implemented for the upper and lower limbs. As mentioned, the only requirement is that the patient have some degree of voluntary contraction. These exercises can be performed in a supine position or in a supported sitting or standing position. A tilt table (a plinth that can rotate 90 degrees from horizontal to vertical) can allow a gradually more upright posture while the patient exercises the arms and legs. The benefit is not only strengthening the legs through weight bearing but also reconditioning the cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular “tone” may be lost with even short periods of bed rest, leading to orthostatism.

For patients with profound motor impairment, neuromuscular electrical stimulation can be used to facilitate strengthening, and in patients with SCI, such stimulation has been demonstrated to reduce disuse-related atrophy.7 However, caution should be exercised with use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with myopathy because it may result in exhaustion of the myopathic muscle.

The primary physiological processes by which normal muscles achieve greater strength are muscle hypertrophy and enhanced neuromuscular control. In the initial 2 weeks of any strengthening program, the improvements in strength are related less to muscle hypertrophy than to enhanced neuromuscular control8; thereafter, muscle hypertrophy is the predominant factor. In the patient with neurological injury as the cause of weakness, improvements in strength also depend greatly on the processes of neurological recovery. The mechanisms of recovery vary, depending on the precise nature and extent of neurological injury.9 For example, central reorganization of motor control (neural plasticity) occurs after stroke, and collateral sprouting of motor unit nerve endings occurs in peripheral neurological injury.

Balance, Coordination, and Neuromuscular Reeducation

Impairment in balance and coordinated motor control can be a very challenging rehabilitation obstacle. Poor postural control may be a sequela of many neurological disorders such as stroke, hydrocephalus, and vestibulopathy, as well as those causing motor weakness, sensory or proprioceptive loss, or extrapyramidal dysfunction. Rehabilitation schemes for the significantly impaired patient start with an assessment of postural control in a seated position. Patients are taught methods to improve trunk stability and correct transient perturbations of balance. Once sitting balance is sufficiently mastered, patients progress through more challenging exercises. Functional exercises such as mobility training, transfer training, and gait training all provide a challenge to postural control and help facilitate improved balance. Advanced proprioceptive exercises include single-leg standing, balance-training platforms, wobble boards, and hopping.

Rehabilitation of an extremity where injury has significantly impaired voluntary motor control is likewise challenging. Selection of a rehabilitation strategy depends, in part, on whether the limb is flaccid or spastic. Treatment in the flaccid extremity focuses on exploiting synergy patterns of muscle activation to facilitate voluntary movement. In the spastic extremity, techniques such as the Bobath neurodevelopmental training method or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation are used along with gentle prolonged stretching to decrease spasticity and improve motor control by using specific tone-reducing postures and movement patterns.10,11 Biofeedback with surface electromyography can be used to facilitate neuromuscular reeducation.11 Orthoses and adaptive equipment are commonly used thoroughout the rehabilitation process to facilitate improvements in extremity function. These are discussed in more detail in subsequent sections.

Adaptive Equipment

As previously mentioned, rehabilitation of the neurologically impaired patient consists of two parts: (1) skilled therapeutic exercise to maximize function (as detailed in the preceding sections) and (2) prescription and incorporation of specific adaptive equipment to facilitate optimal function, mobility, and independence. Table 106-4 outlines some of the more commonly prescribed orthoses and their primary rehabilitation applications. Figures 106-4 to 106-9 depict common ambulatory aids. It is important for the physician and physical therapist to ensure that the prescribed orthosis or ambulatory aid is properly fitted and has the desired effect on function. Proper training with the assistive device to promote maximal function is particularly important with the prescription of ambulatory aids.

TABLE 106-4 Commonly Prescribed Orthoses and Their Primary Applications

Orthoses Type Primary Application
Wrist-hand orthosis Prevents contracture and reduces tone in a spastic upper extremity
Lumbrical bar Prevents hyperextension of metacarpophalangeal joints and improves grip in a hand with loss of intrinsic muscle function
Short thumb shell For median nerve injury: improves pincer grip
Wrist tenodesis splint Facilitates passive finger flexion and grasping when the wrist is placed in extension by the brace
Universal cuff Assists with feeding and grooming by holding utensils
Balanced forearm orthosis Improves active elbow motion by supporting the upper arm in an abducted position and thereby eliminating the effects of gravity
Arm sling or tray Supports the elbow, thus reducing shoulder pain in patients with stroke
Ankle-foot orthosis Prevents footdrop, improves gait mechanics
Long leg brace Supports weak quadriceps and ankle to facilitate ambulation
Reciprocating gait orthosis Supports weak hip girdle and leg muscles to facilitate ambulation
Cane, crutch, or walker (many varieties) Improves balance, prevents falls, reduces arthritic hip and knee pain, reduces energy demands of walking

Before discharge from inpatient rehabilitation centers, patients should have their home environments thoroughly assessed. Some patients may require significant modification of their homes and need additional durable medical equipment to ensure a safe environment and provide the patient with maximal independence. Table 106-5 lists some of the more common equipment needs.

TABLE 106-5 Common Adaptive Equipment and Durable Medical Equipment Needs

Environment Equipment
Home entrance Ramp, railing
Living room Lift chair, reaching device
Bedroom Electric hospital-type bed, bedside commode, urinal
Bathroom Toilet seat riser, bath bench or shower chair, grab bars, handheld shower
Kitchen Built-up utensils
General Scooter, power wheelchair

COMMON MEDICAL AND REHABILITATION ISSUES

Spasticity

Numerous therapeutic strategies exist for the management of spasticity in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome, including rehabilitation strategies, oral medications, intrathecal medications, focal chemodenervation, and surgery. Rehabilitation treatment strategies are variably effective14 and are summarized in Table 106-6. Spasticity scales, such as the Modified Ashworth Scale (Table 106-7), are helpful in monitoring response to treatment.

TABLE 106-6 Rehabilitation Strategies for Spasticity Management

TABLE 106-7 The Modified Ashworth Scale

0 No increase in muscle tone
1 Slight increase in tone with a catch and release or minimal resistance at end of range of motion
1+ Slight increase in tone with a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remaining range of motion
2 More marked increase in tone throughout range of motion
3 Considerable increase in tone, difficulty with passive movement
4 Rigidity of affected part

Before aggressive medical or interventional therapies for spasticity are initiated, the patient should undergo a detailed assessment to determine which functional limitations or possible functional benefits their hypertonicity creates. For example, Ashworth grade 3 tone in the lower extremities of a paraparetic patient with multiple sclerosis may impair lower extremity dressing and personal hygiene. However, the spasticity may make standing pivot transfers easier, particularly if the patient has very poor lower extremity strength. The patient and physician may desire to reduce the spasticity through treatment; however, if therapy is successful and tone is significantly reduced, the patient may lose the ability to perform standing pivot transfers. Thus, both positive and negative effects on function must be considered before treatment, particularly if irreversible treatments such as neurolysis and surgery are being considered.15

The evaluation of a patient with worsening spasticity starts with a thorough assessment of potential noxious stimuli that may create amplification of muscle tone. Common causes of worsening spasticity in patients with SCI include bowel impaction, urinary tract infection, decubitus ulceration, acute abdomen, and pathological fracture. Rapid identification and treatment of these problems can result in a quick return to baseline tone.15

Neurogenic Bowel

Neurogenic bowel associated with SCI and other upper motor neuron disorders typically results in constipation and difficulty with stool evacuation. Rehabilitation interventions are aimed at bowel retraining and establishment of a routine bowel regimen.16,17 The goals of a bowel program are to use either digital rectal stimulation or chemical stimulation (mini-enema or suppository) to trigger reflex evacuation of stool in the distal colon. For this to work appropriately, stools must be soft but well formed so that peristalsis can propagate the stool toward the rectum. Bulking agents such as fiber supplements and stool softeners aid in establishing optimal stool consistency. In a bowel program, patients typically evacuate daily or every other day.

For patients with incomplete neurological injury in which some voluntary motor function is preserved in the sacral segments, a bowel retraining program can be pursued. The goal is to restore the coordinated activation and relaxation of the muscles necessary to have a bowel movement. Intrarectal balloon training can facilitate voluntary evacuation.

Patients who have sustained lower motor neuron injury to the sacral segments face a more challenging task in maintaining stool continence.18 With partial nerve injuries, bowel retraining is focused predominantly on strengthening the pelvic floor, especially the puborectalis and the external anal sphincter. Persistent and significant fecal incontinence reduces patient dignity and may lead to avoidance of socialization. For severe persistent problems that jeopardize skin care, surgical sling procedures or colostomy are options.

Neurogenic Bladder

Neurological injury can cause a variety of problems with bladder function. In the first few weeks after an acute SCI, the bladder is usually flaccid (as a result of spinal shock), and urinary retention occurs. Indwelling catheters are usually placed on initial hospitalization, but as soon as appropriate, patients should be transitioned to an intermittent catheterization schedule. Patients are typically taught to self-catheterize at a frequency of four to five times a day. Oral hydration schedules are created to balance the patient’s needs for hydration without making it necessary to self-catheterize every few hours. The aim is to prevent accumulation of more than 500 mL in the bladder at one time and prevent overdistention, as well as overflow incontinence.19

If the patient regains sacral segment sensorimotor function, bladder training ensues. Patients follow timed voiding schedules and learn techniques to facilitate bladder emptying such as suprapubic compression or reflex-stimulated voiding. Patients can also undergo more intensive electromyographically assisted bladder retraining programs to improve coordinated activation and relaxation of the muscles necessary to evacuate the bladder.19 Postvoid residuals are monitored to ensure complete emptying. When patients can consistently achieve postvoid residuals of less than 100 mL, intermittent catheterization can be discontinued.

Many patients with SCI are at risk for developing detrusor sphincter dyssynergia, which results in a high-pressure bladder. In dyssynergia, the detrusor muscle spontaneously contracts, and the urethral sphincter does not concomitantly relax to allow bladder emptying. This creates high pressures in the bladder that force urine up the ureters into the kidneys; serious renal injury can develop. Dyssynergic bladders can be diagnosed with voiding cystomyography.20 Patients with neurogenic bladder (especially high-pressure bladders) need to undergo periodic reevaluation with cystomyography and lifelong renal surveillance.21

Dysphagia

A clinical swallowing evaluation can be administered at the bedside to establish a basic understanding of a patient’s aspiration risk. A more extensive evaluation with video fluoroscopy can help determine how different food consistencies are handled at the oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal phases of swallowing.23 Patients are taught protective and compensatory techniques for swallowing, such as the supraglottic swallow and the Mendelsohn maneuver.24 Liquids may be particularly difficult to control during the oral phase and are easily aspirated. This risk can be minimized by using a flavorless gelatin to increase the consistency of the liquid without altering its taste. Avoiding foods with multiple consistencies (e.g., stews or soups) also decreases the risk of aspiration.

Communication

Speech and language disorders can be generally classified into four categories: aphasias, dysarthrias, dysphonias, and apraxia of speech. Speech-language pathologists can further characterize these disorders and formulate appropriate speech therapy interventions. Rehabilitation approaches vary according to diagnosis and target the patient’s primary impairments.25 Other difficulties in communication may also result from confusion, ventilator dependency, and cognitive impairment, among other sequelae of significant neurological injury. Further discussion on evaluation and treatment of speech and language disorders can be found in Chapter 3.

SUMMARY

Rehabilitation of the neurologically impaired patient should begin as soon as possible after initial injury and starts with a systematic assessment of neurological function, as well as medical and musculoskeletal comorbid conditions. Fundamental rehabilitation interventions include stretching, strengthening, neuromuscular reeducation, balance and coordination exercises, transfer training, gait training, and ADL training. Adaptive equipment such as splints, braces, and ambulatory aids also facilitate optimal function, mobility, and independence. Comprehensive neurorehabilitation includes appropriate evaluation and treatment of spasticity, neurogenic bowel, neurogenic bladder, pressure ulcers, swallowing dysfunction, and impaired communication, among other medical and musculoskeletal complications of neurological injury.

References

1 Spinal Cord Injury, Facts and Figures at a Glance, Birmingham AL. University of Alabama at Birmingham, National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, August 2004. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S139-S140.

2 American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2005 Update. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2004.

3 International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI. Atlanta: American Spinal Injury Association, 2002.

4 Vollmer DG. Prognosis and outcome of severe head injury. In: Cooper PR, editor. Head Injury. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1993:553-581.

5 Bandy WD, Irion JM, Briggler M. The effect of static stretch and dynamic range of motion training on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Phys Ther. 1998;27:295-300.

6 Bandy WD, Irion JM. The effect of time on static stretch on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Phys Ther. 1994;74:845-852.

7 Yarkony GM, Roth EJ, Cybulski GR, et al. Neuromuscular stimulation in spinal cord injury II: prevention of secondary complications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:195-200.

8 Moritani T, deVries HA. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med. 1979;58:115-130.

9 Bach-y-Rita P, Brown AW, Lazarus JC, et al. Neural aspects of motor function as a basis of early and postacute rehabilitation. In: DeLisa JA, Gans BM, editors. Rehabilitation Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1993:381-403.

10 Luke C, Dodd KJ, Brock K. Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:888-898.

11 Albert T, Yelnik A. [Physiotherapy for spasticity]. Neurochirurgie. 2003;49(2–3, Pt 2):239-246.

12 Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT, et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995;26:976-981.

13 Miyai I, Fujimoto Y, Yamamoto H, et al. Long-term effect of body weight–supported treadmill training in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1370-1373.

14 Watanabe T. The role of therapy in spasticity management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(10, Suppl):S45-S49.

15 Satkunam LE. Rehabilitation medicine: 3. Management of adult spasticity. CMAJ. 2003;169:1173-1179.

16 Chen D, Nussbaum SB. The gastrointestinal system and bowel management following spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2000;11:45-56.

17 Merenda L, Brown JP. Bladder and bowel management for the child with spinal cord dysfunction. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S16-S23.

18 Yim SY, Yoon SH, Lee IY, et al. A comparison of bowel care patterns in patients with spinal cord injury: upper motor neuron bowel vs lower motor neuron bowel. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:204-207.

19 Andrews KL, Opitz JL. Bladder retraining. In: Sinaki M, editor. Basic Clinical Rehabilitation Medicine. 2nd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1993:195-206.

20 Rendeli C, Ausili E, Salvaggio E. Neurogenic bladder dysfunction: urodynamic evaluation. Rays. 2002;27:127-130.

21 Fowler CJ, O’Malley KJ. Investigation and management of neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(Suppl 4):iv27-iv31.

22 Edlich RF, Winters KL, Woodard CR, et al. Pressure ulcer prevention. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2004;14:285-304.

23 Finestone HM, Greene-Finestone LS. Rehabilitation medicine: 2. Diagnosis of dysphagia and its nutritional management for stroke patients. CMAJ. 2003;169:1041-1044.

24 Noll SF, Bender CE, Nelson MC, et al. Rehabilitation of patients with swallowing disorders. In: Braddom RL, editor. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000:535-560.

25 Miller RM, Groher ME, Yorkston KM, et al. Speech, language, swallowing and auditory rehabilitation. In: DeLisa JA, Gans BM, Walsh NE, et al, editors. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:1025-1050.

26 Erickson RP. Autonomic hyperreflexia: pathophysiology and medical management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61:431-440.

27 Buschbacher R. Heterotopic ossification: a review. Crit Rev Phys Med Rehabil Med. 1992;4:199-213.

28 Finerman GA, Stover SL. Heterotopic ossification following hip replacement or spinal cord injury. Two clinical studies with EHDP. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res. 1981;3:337-342.