Neoplasms of the Posterior Fossa

Published on 21/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Otolaryngology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 4755 times

CHAPTER 177 Neoplasms of the Posterior Fossa

Key Points

With the evolution of advanced audiovestibular testing, sensitive imaging technologies, and modern skull base surgical teams, diagnosis and management of extra-axial posterior fossa neoplasms constitute a consideration in the daily practice of otolaryngology. This chapter reviews diagnostic issues and surgical management.

Approach to Diagnosis of Neoplasms of the Posterior Fossa

Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) lesions are the predominant skull base neoplasms that affect the posterior fossa. Although acoustic neuromas account for most primary neoplasms in this category, many other lesions should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

The diagnostic evaluation begins with a thorough neuro-otologic history and physical examination. Any suspicious neuro-otologic finding should be evaluated thoroughly, because these lesions produce minimal signs and symptoms until they are far advanced. As noted, acoustic neuromas are the most common posterior fossa skull base tumors; less common lesions usually can be diagnosed accurately with the application of modern audiologic and imaging modalities and a systematic approach to evaluation of their differing characteristics. Today’s improved diagnostic capabilities facilitate routine detection of tumors smaller than those detectable previously.

Posterior fossa skull base neoplasms may be grouped into common CPA lesions, including lesions of the internal auditory canal; petrous apex lesions; rare CPA lesions; and intra-axial lesions. The signs, symptoms, and diagnostic procedures for tumors within the designated categories (Box 177-1) are described next.

Common Cerebellopontine Angle Neoplasms

In published series of CPA neoplasms, acoustic neuromas are the most common tumors, accounting for more than 90%. The remaining primary tumors were meningiomas (3%), primary cholesteatomas (2.5%), and facial nerve schwannomas (1%), with less common tumors composing the remaining lesions.1 When secondary tumors also are considered, paragangliomas constitute up to 10% of CPA neoplasms.2

Acoustic Neuroma

Acoustic neuroma refers to a benign schwannoma of the eighth cranial nerve. These lesions are relatively common and account for 8% to 10% of all intracranial tumors. Acoustic neuromas arise principally from the vestibular division of the nerve. The superior and inferior divisions are equally affected; intraoperatively, the nerve of origin usually is difficult to determine. The 1992 National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference made vestibular schwannoma the official nomenclature term for these lesions. Acoustic neuromas are slowly growing neoplasms that originate in the nerve sheath and consist of schwannoma cells in a collagenous matrix. They typically are circumscribed, grossly encroaching on and displacing neural structures without direct invasion. Consistency varies, ranging from firm and dense to soft with large cystic spaces.

In the past it was taught that acoustic neuromas usually arise near the myelin-glia junction near the porus acusticus. However, no published histopathologic study has confirmed this assertion. These lesions usually arise within the internal auditory canal; however, they occasionally develop in the CPA medial to the porus. Because acoustic neuromas produce symptoms by exerting pressure on surrounding neurovascular structures, auditory and vestibular symptoms develop earlier with tumors of the internal auditory canal than with tumors of the CPA.

Of the 2000 to 3000 acoustic neuromas diagnosed annually in the United States, more than 95% occur as unilateral and nonhereditary lesions. The remaining acoustic neuromas are manifestations of the neurofibromatoses, which consist of at least two distinct genetic disorders.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), or von Recklinghausen’s disease, is a relatively common disorder of autosomal dominant inheritance with variable penetrance and an incidence of 1 in 4000 live births. The gene responsible for NF1 has been localized to chromosome 17. NF1 neuromas occur throughout the body, arising both intracranially and extracranially from the Schwann cells of any nerve; however, acoustic neuromas develop in less than 5% of patients, and bilateral acoustic neuroma is not a part of the syndrome.

Type 2 neurofibromatosis, NF2, is the central form of the disease, characterized by bilateral acoustic neuromas in up to 96% of patients. Schwannomas of the other cranial nerves, meningiomas, and ependymomas also are observed much more commonly in patients with NF2.3 The precise frequency of NF2 is unknown, but it is far less frequent than NF1. The gene responsible for the condition encodes a membrane protein (merlin or schwannomin) and is located on chromosome 22. Acoustic neuromas in NF2 are characterized by an onset early in life, often before the age of 21 years, as opposed to unilateral lesions, most of which are diagnosed between the ages of 40 and 60 years. Thus, acoustic neuromas appearing before the age of 30 years mandate particularly close evaluation of the contralateral ear. Although the acoustic neuromas in NF1 and NF2 resemble the lesions in nonhereditary acoustic neuromas, they are technically more challenging to remove because of a tendency to adhere to nearby structures. The clinical presentation of acoustic neuroma in neurofibromatosis is identical to that of unilateral acoustic neuroma.

Malignant schwannomas may rarely occur. They often are associated with neurofibromatosis, but they also may occur with solitary schwannomas. Another very uncommon variant is a pigmented schwannoma.4

Natural History

The growth rate of acoustic neuromas is extremely variable. These tumors generally are slow-growing, with average reported growth rates of 0.2 cm per year; however, growth rates in excess of 2 cm per year have been documented. Acoustic neuromas that are not treated are potentially lethal. Gradual enlargement can lead to indentation of the brainstem, increased intracranial pressure, and death during a course of 5 to 15 years.5

Growth of acoustic neuromas generally occurs in three phases: internal auditory canal, cisternal, and brainstem compression (Figs. 177-1, 177-2, and 177-3). Growth within the internal auditory canal results in acoustic and facial nerve compression and attenuation. Displacement of the seventh cranial nerve, the acoustic (eighth) nerve, and the anterior inferior cerebellar artery occurs just medial to the porus acusticus (cisternal portion). Medial tumor growth augments the blood supply of the tumor with bridging vessels from the brainstem surface. Fourth ventricle shift often occurs when the CPA component reaches 2 to 3 cm and total ventricle obstruction with resulting hydrocephalus occurs with continued tumor growth. Trigeminal compression occurs at approximately the 3-cm stage, which permits the superior portion of the tumor to abut the fifth cranial nerve. Massive tumor growth with hydrocephalus, brainstem compression, and cerebellar tonsil herniation may occur even with modern imaging. The otolaryngologist should remain vigilant for signs and symptoms suggestive of retrocochlear pathology.

Signs and Symptoms

Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), tinnitus, dysequilibrium, and facial hypesthesia are, in descending order, the most common symptoms of acoustic neuroma. Although progressive unilateral SNHL is the most common symptom, loss of speech discrimination is characteristic of retrocochlear dysfunction of the cochlear nerve presumably from pressure on the auditory nerve. The symptoms usually are slowly progressive, with a median duration of 2 years in one series.6,7 However, up to 20% of affected patients experience sudden SNHL, although complete recovery of hearing has been reported.8 Overall, only 1% of patients with sudden SNHL are found to have acoustic neuroma, whereas up to 5% of patients with acoustic neuroma have normal hearing.9 Thus, any patient with asymmetric or sudden hearing loss (even after total recovery) should be considered for further evaluation for a possible retrocochlear lesion.

The dysequilibrium associated with acoustic nerve tumors usually is a mild balance disturbance, which often is so minor that the patient does not mention it and only careful questioning elicits it. Rotatory vertigo is far less common.

Diminished facial sensation or corneal reflex results from compression of the fifth cranial nerve, which is more likely with medium-sized and large tumors. As large acoustic neuromas compress the fourth ventricle and brainstem, long tract signs, ataxia, and findings of increased intracranial pressure (e.g., headaches, nausea) are produced.

Diagnostic Studies

Two categories of studies are performed in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. Auditory and vestibular studies assess the functional integrity of the audiovestibular system, whereas imaging studies are performed for the definitive anatomic diagnosis.

Auditory Brainstem Response Testing

Until recently, auditory brainstem (evoked) response (ABR) testing was considered the most sensitive modality for the detection of even small tumors, with detection rates of 95% to 100%.12 The brainstem response to an 83-dB broadband click is recorded while the contralateral ear is masked by 78-dB white noise.13 The latency for detection of wave V for the two ears is compared, and an adjusted interaural latency for wave V greater than 0.2 msec is considered abnormal. An approximately 10% false-positive rate has been reported for patients with SNHL who do not have a CPA tumor. Since the advent of gadolinium-enhanced MRI, however, the ABR false-negative rate (missing tumor diagnosis) has been 18% to 30% for intracanalicular tumors.14 The possibility of false-negative results with intracanalicular acoustic neuromas has lessened the role of ABR testing for routine screening.15 Stacked ABR testing is a modified ABR technique that offers improved sensitivity for detection of intracanalicular acoustic neuromas. It consists of testing the audiometric spectrum in a frequency-specific fashion followed by temporal alignment of the results; amplitude changes thus detected are much more sensitive for diagnosing small acoustic tumors than with routine ABR.16,17 Nonetheless, the technique has not yet been verified in widespread clinical practice.

Vestibular Tests

Vestibular testing is not a useful screening test for acoustic neuroma. Electronystagmography (ENG) and infrared video caloric testing are helpful in defining whether the tumor arises from the superior or the inferior vestibular nerve.18 Such information is valuable when hearing preservation surgery for acoustic neuromas is under consideration, because theoretically better results may be obtained with resection of tumors of the superior vestibular nerve.

Imaging

Computed tomography (CT) and MRI with the paramagnetic intravenous contrast agent gadopentetate (gadolinium-DTPA) are the principal imaging modalities for CPA lesions. Lo19 proposed a scheme for the CT or MRI differential diagnosis of CPA lesions by anatomic location (extra-axial, extradural, or intra-axial) and by incidence (rare or common) (Table 177-1). In adults and teenagers acoustic neuromas, meningiomas, and epidermoids are the three most common lesions. Acoustic neuromas are very rare in children. Instead, brainstem gliomas (which can enlarge the internal auditory canal) are the most common CPA lesion in younger children.20 Distinguishing among the three most common CPA lesions is based on specific imaging characteristics on CT and MRI (Table 177-2).

Table 177-1 Differential Diagnosis of Cerebellopontine Lesions by Imaging Location* and Incidence

Location Incidence Type
Extra-axial Most common Acoustic neuroma
Common Meningioma
Common Epidermoid (and other cysts: arachnoid, cysticercal, dermoid)
Rare Nonacoustic neuromas (cranial nerves V, VII, IX, X, XI, XII)
Rare Vascular lesions (loops, aneurysms, malformations)
Extradural Common Paraganglioma (glomus jugulare, glomus vagale)
Rare Bone lesions (benign or malignant; primary or metastatic)
Intra-axial Rare Astrocytoma, ependymoma, papilloma, hemangioblastoma, metastasis

* Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Adapted from Lo WM. Tumors of the temporal bone and cerebellopontine angle. In: Som PM, Bergeron RT, eds. Head and Neck Imaging. St Louis: Mosby; 1991:420-445.

Although CT revolutionized the diagnosis of CPA tumors, gadolinium contrast MRI is sensitive and specific for detection of acoustic neuroma and is the diagnostic imaging technique of choice for the evaluation of acoustic neuroma and other CPA lesions (see Fig. 177-2).21,22 Acoustic neuroma images on MRI are isointense or mildly hypointense to brain on T1-weighted images and mildly hyperintense to brain on T2-weighted images.19 MRI for investigation of possible acoustic neuroma should be performed with intravenous contrast. Gadolinium increases the diagnostic sensitivity of MRI on T1-weighted images, and detection of lesions as small as 3 mm has been reported.21 In addition to improving sensitivity in diagnosing acoustic neuromas, MRI is noninvasive, and the patient incurs no radiation exposure.

Before MRI, CT was the principal study for CPA lesions. Now the role of CT is to provide adjunctive information regarding the osseous structures surrounding a CPA lesion. It also can be the primary imaging modality in patients who cannot undergo MRI because of medical reasons (e.g., cardiac pacemaker or cochlear implant) or unmanageable phobic reactions. The CT finding characteristic of an acoustic tumor is an ovoid lesion centered on the internal auditory canal with moderate enhancing qualities. The tumor often is not homogeneous, exhibiting areas of lesser and greater enhancement. Approximately 85% of acoustic neuromas show acute angles at the bone-tumor interface, in contrast with meningiomas, in which the interface is obtuse in 75% of tumors.19

Intravenous contrast CT can fail to detect acoustic neuromas smaller than 1.5 cm in greatest dimension. Oxygen cisternography has been used to diagnose small, mainly intracanalicular lesions. In this technique, 4 mL of oxygen was introduced into the subarachnoid space through the opening afforded by a lumbar puncture, to highlight the structures of the internal auditory canal. This technique was very sensitive for detection of small lesions; however, it was limited by a false-positive rate of 5% and the need for a lumbar puncture.23

The improved availability of MRI has led to the development of MRI-based internal auditory canal screening protocols, which in many centers are comparable in cost to ABR-based internal auditory canal screening.11 Special T2-weighted fast-spin echo sequences may achieve the accuracy of T1-weighted sequences with gadolinium without the need for contrast (see Fig. 177-1).24 Although the software for these special sequences is not generally available, initial findings with this technique are very encouraging.

Meningiomas

Meningiomas represent up to 18% of all intracranial tumors and approximately 3% of CPA tumors.25 The cells lining the arachnoid villi are the cells of origin. These cells are distributed throughout the intracranial space predominantly in relation to veins and dural sinuses. Meningiomas are benign but locally aggressive tumors, which occur at different anatomic sites in the following order of frequency: parasagittal region, falx, convexity, olfactory groove, tuberculum sellae, sphenoid ridge, petrous face (CPA), tentorium, lateral ventricle, clivus, and others.26

The gross appearance typically is that of a globular mass firmly adherent to the dura mater, with characteristic speckles scattered throughout the tumor that correspond to the microscopic psammoma bodies. The tumor displaces but does not invade adjacent neural tissue and has a thin investing capsule. Meningiomas can invade bone without destruction by extension along haversion canals. Adjacent bone is hyperostotic in 25% of cases.26

Many histopathologic classifications have been proposed, but a single, widely used system distinguishes among syncytial, transitional, fibrous, angioblastic, and sarcomatous types.27 The specific histopathologic subtypes and growth characteristics are reviewed elsewhere.28 In the posterior fossa, meningiomas usually arise on the posterior surface of the petrous bone, away from or at the edge of the internal auditory canal, or along the sigmoid sinus. Because they usually arise outside of the canal, these tumors may become large before producing signs and symptoms of cranial nerve VIII compression. Most meningiomas eventually involve cranial nerve VIII.

Signs and Symptoms

Audiovestibular symptoms usually are the first indication of a posterior fossa meningioma. Among patients presenting to neurosurgeons, a higher proportion first experienced symptoms referable to the trigeminal nerve.29 The signs and symptoms of meningiomas are similar to those of acoustic neuromas. Small tumors produce hearing loss, tinnitus, and imbalance. Larger tumors also produce signs and symptoms of involvement of other cranial nerves and hydrocephalus.

Diagnostic Studies

Imaging

Table 177-2 summarizes features of meningiomas that assist in differentiating them from acoustic neuromas. Unlike acoustic neuromas, meningiomas usually are eccentric to the porus. Whereas acoustic neuromas seldom herniate into the middle fossa, approximately 60% of meningiomas extend to the middle fossa.19 Meningiomas usually are hemispheric because of their broad-based attachment to the posterior petrous wall, accounting for the obtuse bone-tumor angles in 75% of meningiomas. Unlike the site of origin of acoustic neuromas, that of posterior fossa meningiomas is varied (Figs. 177-4 and 177-5).

On CT, approximately two thirds of meningiomas are hyperintense relative to the brain. Unlike acoustic neuromas, meningiomas are homogeneous and occasionally calcified. They show homogeneous enhancement with iodine infusion, which usually permits differentiation from acoustic neuromas. Hyperostosis of adjacent bone is infrequent but characteristic of meningiomas when present.

On MRI, meningiomas are of extremely variable intensity on T2-weighted images and isointense or slightly hypointense to brain on T1-weighted images. The different signal intensities among meningiomas correspond to different histopathologic subtypes.27 Surface flow voids on MRI correspond to marginal pial blood vessels, and arborizing flow voids represent active feeders to the tumor. Calcification and cystic foci cause heterogeneity on MRI images of meningiomas.

Primary Cholesteatomas

Primary cholesteatomas (epidermoids) consist of a stratified squamous epithelial lining surrounding desquamated keratin, which originates from epithelial rests within the temporal bone or CPA. These lesions usually are slow-growing, and symptoms often do not become apparent until the second to fourth decades of life. As the lesions expand, compression and irritation of surrounding structures produce the signs and symptoms.

Primary cholesteatomas arise adjacent to the brainstem. Because they expand into the area of least resistance, primary cholesteatomas have variable shapes with irregular surfaces. They may burrow into crevices on the surface of the brain or extend in a dumbbell pattern into the middle fossa.

Diagnostic Studies

Imaging

CT and MRI are useful to differentiate primary cholesteatomas from other lesions. Epidermoids originating in the CPA should be distinguished from arachnoid cysts, and epidermoids in the petrous apex should be distinguished from the much more common cholesterol granulomas. This distinction affects therapy because adequate management for primary cholesteatoma requires excision, whereas drainage is sufficient for cholesterol granulomas and arachnoid cysts.

On CT, primary cholesteatomas are less dense than brain (having a density approximating that of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) and exhibit no enhancement with intravenous contrast. These lesions have irregular margins and are eccentric to the porus acusticus. Enhancing components suggest an associated malignancy.31 With MRI, primary cholesteatomas are inhomogeneous and hypointense to brain on T1-weighted images, and homogeneous and isointense or hyperintense to brain on T2-weighted images (Fig. 177-6). Schwannomas, meningiomas, and chondromas are similar to primary cholesteatomas by intensity criteria; however, epidermoids are differentiated because they are nonenhancing.

Arachnoid cysts of the CPA are difficult to distinguish from epidermoids on CT and MRI. Both lesions are of CSF density and nonenhancing; compared with primary cholesteatomas, however, arachnoid cysts have smoother surfaces, and special MRI sequences such as diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) may differentiate the intensity of the epidermoid from the CSF intensity of the arachnoid cyst (Fig. 177-7).

Facial Nerve Neuroma

Facial nerve neuromas (schwannomas) are uncommon benign neoplasms of Schwann cells that may arise anywhere along the course of the facial nerve.

Diagnostic Studies

Imaging

Intratemporal facial nerve lesions may produce bone destruction. Because the clinical presentation and audiometric study findings in facial neuroma are not distinct, CT and MRI constitute the mainstays of diagnosis.

Because facial nerve neuromas are histologically identical to acoustic neuromas, they have the same enhancement characteristics. It usually is impossible to identify these lesions using CT. Anterosuperior erosion of the internal auditory canal or erosion of the labyrinthine facial nerve canal if present may be the only diagnostic clue.19 More distal tumors enlarge the geniculate ganglion and fallopian canal.

As with CT, MRI of facial neuroma produces imaging characteristics identical to those of acoustic neuromas (Fig. 177-8). The preoperative diagnosis of intracranial facial neuroma is difficult. Early facial nerve symptoms are an obvious warning that a CPA lesion may rarely be a facial nerve neuroma. Patients diagnosed with CPA neuromas should be warned preoperatively of a 1% risk of facial nerve neuroma. This possibility is emphasized if findings on preoperative ENoG are abnormal on the tumor side. In some tumors, the lesion may extend from the CPA through the temporal bone course of the nerve to the extratemporal nerve in the parotid gland.

Other Cranial Nerve Neuromas

Neuromas may arise on any other cranial nerve in the posterior fossa. On imaging studies, nonacoustic neuromas have the same characteristics as those of acoustic neuromas except for their location. Overall, acoustic neuromas represent 95% of intracranial schwannomas, and trigeminal neuromas are the next most common; however, schwannomas also have been reported on cranial nerves IX, X, XI, and XII. These lesions are distinguished by their different location and by symptoms of dysfunction of the cranial nerve of origin.

Trigeminal neuromas arise intradurally, from the nerve root in the CPA and Meckel’s cave, and extradurally, from the gasserian ganglion in the middle cranial fossa.35 Typically these lesions enlarge Meckel’s cave and produce hypesthesia of the face (Fig. 177-9).

Neuromas of cranial nerves IX, X, and XI produce smooth enlargement of the jugular foramen and classically cause hypesthesia and weakness of the palate, vocal cord, and shoulder, respectively (Fig. 177-10). If they arise in the posterior fossa, these tumors may grow to a large size before producing predominantly acoustic or cerebellar signs. Accurate preoperative differentiation of these tumors from acoustic neuromas is important because residual hearing is more likely to be preserved with lower cranial nerve neuromas. Hypoglossal neuromas produce motor hemiatrophy of the tongue and enlargement of the hypoglossal canal on radiography.

Glomus Tumors

Glomus tumors (paragangliomas) are discussed in detail in Chapter 176. Because glomus jugulare tumors and glomus vagale tumors may extend into the posterior fossa, they constitute an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of skull base neoplasms.

The first symptom often is pulsatile tinnitus, after which a conductive hearing loss develops. Involvement of the nerves of the jugular foramen and the hypoglossal nerve causes progressive neurologic deficits related to those nerves.

The characteristic appearance on CT with bone windows is irregular destruction of the jugular foramen, as compared with jugular foramen schwannomas, which produce smooth enlargement (Fig. 177-11). The vascular pattern of paragangliomas on angiography is characteristic (Fig. 177-12), and biopsy of these lesions is not indicated.36 Diagnostic angiography should be performed concomitantly with preoperative embolization when surgical resection is planned.

MRI produces a unique salt-and-pepper mixture of intensities on T1- and T2-weighted images. Arborizing flow voids reveal the prominent tumor vessels of this lesion. Lo19 described two limitations of MRI in evaluating paragangliomas: (1) bone changes and the relation of tumor to bone landmarks are not visualized; and (2) distinguishing tumor from bone marrow is difficult, especially on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. Thus, MRI may provide complementary information about infralabyrinthine and intracranial tumor extensions, but bone algorithm CT is the cornerstone of imaging evaluation in paragangliomas.

The combination of CT, MRI, and angiography can provide extensive information about involvement of the internal carotid artery. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an adjunct to intra-arterial catheterization and formal angiography (see Fig. 177-12). Angiography is a necessary step in preoperative embolization of glomus tumors; however, it is unlikely that MRA can replace direct intravascular angiography in glomus tumor management. For resection of skull base neoplasms involving the posterior fossa, if surgical resection requires manipulation of the artery, preoperative assessment of the adequacy of collateral flow by way of the circle of Willis is necessary. Temporary balloon occlusion of the carotid artery in combination with radioisotope imaging or xenon-enhanced CT can accurately quantify collateral blood flow.37

Arachnoid Cysts

Arachnoid cysts are thin-walled sacs that contain yellow, entrapped CSF. The current theory is that these lesions represent congenital developmental anomalies.38 Symptoms are produced by the mass effect of the cyst on surrounding structures and may be similar to the symptoms of acoustic neuromas. These patients may experience mild to profound hearing loss with a retrocochlear pattern.39

These lesions have CT and MRI characteristics similar to those of epidermoids. Enlargement of the internal auditory canal often is noted but is not characteristic of these lesions. The typical appearance is that of a smooth-surfaced lesion, which on CT approximates CSF and is nonenhancing and on MRI exhibits isointensity or hypointensity to brain on T1-weighted images and hyperintensity to brain on T2-weighted images (see Fig. 177-7). In most patients, no direct intervention is necessary. When treatment is necessary to control symptoms, management of these lesions is not total resection. Instead, surgical drainage by way of retrolabyrinthine exposure is the usual recommended therapy; however, diuretic therapy provides symptomatic relief in a few patients.

Hemangiomas

Hemangiomas are hamartomatous neoplasms originating from blood vessels. Although benign, they produce symptoms by compression of adjacent structures. Hemangiomas are capillary or cavernous.

Capillary hemangiomas typically arise in the area of the geniculate ganglion in association with a perigeniculate capillary plexus.40 The lesion is characterized by a progressive facial weakness despite being much smaller than facial nerve neuromas. The expanding lesion with the production of pulsatile tinnitus may expose the upper basal turn of the cochlea. CT shows a smooth enlargement of the geniculate ganglion and enlargement of the labyrinthine portion of the fallopian canal by a soft tissue mass. Although capillary hemangiomas are enhancing, they produce facial weakness at such an early stage that only subtle findings may be apparent on CT, and a very small enhancement in the area of the labyrinthine segment may be the only finding. Other CT findings include honeycomb bone, irregular and indistinct bone margins, and intratumoral bone spicules (Fig. 177-13). These findings contrast with those in facial nerve neuromas, which are larger, more obvious lesions with sharp bone margins.

Cavernous hemangiomas are the second type of hemangioma. These lesions arise in the internal auditory canal and produce symptoms typical for an acoustic neuroma. Although they tend to produce symptoms more rapidly than do acoustic neuromas, these two tumor types are identical on CT. However, on MRI, cavernous hemangiomas tend to be slightly more hyperintense than the typical acoustic neuroma.

Petrous Apex Lesions

Petrous apex lesions constitute an important category of skull base neoplasms that may involve the posterior fossa. Some of the specific lesions have been described earlier under “Common Cerebellopontine Angle Neoplasms.” The critical distinction in diagnosis of petrous apex lesions is between cholesterol granulomas, which require drainage procedures, and mass lesions, which generally require complete excision.

Cholesterol Granulomas

A cholesterol granuloma arises in the pneumatized spaces of the temporal bone presumably as a result of occlusion of the air cell system. Hemorrhage into the air cells results in a foreign body reaction and progressive granuloma formation. An expansile lesion of the temporal bone results, with extension into the CPA and resultant signs and symptoms of cranial nerve VIII dysfunction. A recent theory suggests that exposed bone marrow may hemorrhage into the pneumatized petrous apex air cells, producing the foreign body reaction and granuloma formation.41 This newer concept more adequately explains the presence of cholesterol granuloma in well-pneumatized temporal bones.

The CT and MRI findings with this lesion are distinguishable from those with the other common lesions of the petrous apex (Table 177-3). On CT, the lesions result in a punched-out appearance of the temporal bone with an isodense mass of the petrous apex that does not enhance; however, rim enhancement is evident with intravenous contrast. On MRI, T1- and T2-weighted images are hyperintense with respect to brain (Fig. 177-14). Primary cholesteatomas are the main lesions from which cholesterol granulomas should be distinguished. Cholesterol granulomas are much more common and occur 20 times more frequently than epidermoids. Overall, cholesterol granulomas are relatively uncommon compared with acoustic neuromas. Only 1 cholesterol granuloma is identified for every 35 acoustic neuromas diagnosed. Imaging distinguishes petrous apex epidermoids from petrous apex cholesterol granulomas. On CT, epidermoids show rim enhancement. With MRI, cholesterol granulomas are hyperintense on T1- and T2-weighted images, whereas epidermoids are hyperintense only on T2-weighted images.

Total excision of cholesterol granulomas usually is unnecessary. Drainage may be achieved by a transmastoid or transcanal infralabyrinthine approach with preservation of cranial nerve function. The transcanal, infracochlear, hypotympanotomy approach is preferred because it affords dependent drainage and the possibility of revision, if necessary, through a myringotomy.42 In cases with unfavorable anatomy for infracochlear or infralabyrinthine drainage, middle fossa drainage is an option. Suprisingly, long-term follow-up imaging has demonstrated that middle fossa catheter drainage to the mastoid remains patent.43

Mucocele, Mucus Retention Cysts, and Petrous Apex Effusion

Petrous apex air cells may become obstructed, resulting in retained secretions as a mucus retention cyst in the petrous apex (Fig. 177-16) or an expansile mucocele (Fig. 177-17). CT reveals a nonenhancing lesion limited to the petrous apex air cell system. The MRI appearance is consistent with a mucus-filled lesion (hypointense on T1-weighted and hyperintense on T2-weighted images). A symptomatic mucocele behaves like chronic mastoiditis, with pressure symptoms that require drainage for relief. Occasionally, retained petrous apex fluid also can cause symptoms even without mucocele. Medical treatment as for a middle ear effusion or surgical drainage usually is therapeutic.43

Miscellaneous Cerebellopontine Angle Lesions

Metastatic Tumors

Tumors may metastasize to the CPA from other sites, including lung, breast, prostate, oropharynx, and skin (i.e., cutaneous melanomas).44 Tumors from these sites are distinguished by their rapid progression of symptoms and associated neurologic signs, in addition to hearing loss and dizziness. Associated lytic lesions in the petrous apex constitute another distinguishing feature of metastatic tumors. Rapid impairment of hearing, other cranial neuropathies, and brainstem dysfunction suggest malignant neoplasms of the posterior fossa, especially in a patient with a history of another malignancy.

Chordomas

Chordomas are dysontogenetic neoplasms that arise in remnants of the embryonic notochord. Although more than one half of these tumors arise in the sacrococcygeal region, more than one third occur at the skull base in the region of the clivus or, less commonly, the upper cervical vertebrae.45 The prominent clinical characteristics are extensive bone destruction and progressive cranial nerve palsies. Extension of clivus chordomas to the petrous apex, sphenoid, or CPA is not unusual. Although fronto-orbital headache and vision complaints (e.g., limited visual fields, diplopia, loss of acuity) are more common, occasionally the initial symptoms reflect extension into the CPA. On CT, the bone destruction is readily apparent, and the masses are homogeneous with moderate enhancement and a greater density than that of bone (Fig. 177-19). MRI reveals isointensity on T1-weighted images and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images (Fig. 177-20).

Lipomas

Lipomas are hamartomas that are thinly encapsulated and poorly delineated. They appear as soft, multilobular masses of typical adult adipose tissue. Lipomas within the internal auditory canal can produce symptoms typical of an acoustic neuroma. Although on CT these lesions are less dense than neuromas, MRI is diagnostic. The lesions are hyperintense on T1-weighted images, nonenhancing with gadolinium, and hypointense on T2-weighted images (Fig. 177-23). Fat-suppression techniques with T1-weighted sequences are confirmatory because the previously identified lesion that was hyperintense on nonenhanced T1-weighted images is rendered hypointense with fat suppression (Fig. 177-24).

Intra-axial Tumors

Intra-axial tumors may occasionally be confused with CPA tumors as a result of extension to the CPA or compression of CPA structures. Intra-axial tumors may arise from the brainstem (gliomas), the cerebellum (medulloblastomas from the vermis or astrocytomas from the peduncles), or the fourth ventricle (choroid plexus papillomas and ependymomas). Although such lesions are highly unusual, the possibility cannot be ignored. In children, brainstem gliomas are reportedly the most common CPA neoplasms. Intra-axial tumors usually are isointense on T1-weighted MRI and hyperintense on T2-weighted images.20,21

Tumors of the Fourth Ventricle

Malignant Choroid Plexus Papillomas and Ependymomas

Choroid plexus papillomas and ependymomas arise from the fourth ventricle and cause CPA symptoms by growing through the foramen of Luschka. In this location, they produce early signs of cranial nerve VIII dysfunction. In malignant choroid plexus papillomas, CT shows a mass with enhancing characteristics of a schwannoma (Fig. 177-25). These tumors are distinguishable from an acoustic schwannoma by being separate from the internal auditory canal. Ependymomas may calcify, and those portions have variable imaging characteristics. At MRI, both lesions are isointense to brain on T1-weighted images and mildly hyperintense to brain on T2-weighted images (Fig. 177-26). Malignant ependymomas require multimodality therapy. The role of surgery is for biopsy, brainstem decompression, and management of hydrocephalus.

Surgery of the Posterior Cranial Fossa

This section addresses surgical management of extra-axial lesions of the posterior cranial fossa and internal auditory canal. Adequate exposure for skull base neoplasms involving the posterior fossa requires precise management of the temporal bone. The modern era for skull base surgery and transtemporal techniques began in 1961, when House introduced the operating microscope and multidisciplinary team surgery for removal of acoustic neuromas. With the vastly reduced mortality and excellent facial nerve preservation rates of the translabyrinthine approach for acoustic neuromas, House established the translabyrinthine approach as the procedure with which all other microsurgical approaches to the CPA are compared.46 Subsequently, multiple approaches to the CPA have been developed, each with its own advantages and indications.

Thus, the modern skull base surgical team can choose from among various approaches for resection of posterior fossa neoplasms. The procedure should be tailored to the individual patient’s pathology and physiologic status. Realistic counseling of patients is critical for informed decisions concerning surgical approaches and possible cranial nerve sequelae. Skull base surgery is a team endeavor, and the full array of experts familiar with the specific needs of these patients is necessary for a successful outcome.

This section details the basic approach, specific indications, techniques, and special features of the translabyrinthine, retrosigmoid, suboccipital, retrolabyrinthine, transcochlear, transotic, middle fossa, extended middle fossa, and petrosal approaches for skull base neoplasms involving the posterior fossa. Table 177-4 summarizes the basic indications for and drawbacks of the various approaches for resection of these tumors.

In addition, the surgical approaches for skull base lesions that are adequately managed by drainage also are reviewed. A method for selecting the surgical approaches for removal of acoustic neuromas suitable for hearing preservation is presented, and general principles of patient management and management of complications of posterior fossa tumor surgery are outlined.

Translabyrinthine Approach

Technique

The following discussion details patient positioning, preparation, monitoring, and tumor removal for the translabyrinthine approach. The same techniques are used for the other approaches except when otherwise specified.

The patient is positioned supine with the head turned to the opposite side. Head-holding pins or supports are not used. Electromyography (EMG) electrodes for intraoperative facial nerve monitoring are inserted into the orbicularis oris and orbicularis oculi. Intravenous antibiotic is administered when the patient arrives in the operating room. Antibiotic also is used in the irrigation solution. Hyperventilation usually is sufficient for brain relaxation.

The curved postauricular incision is made with the apex 3 cm posterior to the postauricular crease. The soft tissue and periosteum are elevated from the mastoid and adjacent occipital bone, and self-retaining retractors are inserted.

The bone removal is accomplished in four stages and is performed using the operating microscope, a high-speed drill, and continuous suction-irrigation.5 Most of the drilling is performed with cutting burrs; however, diamond burrs are used when drilling is performed on the dura or venous sinuses. The first stage is a complete mastoidectomy. Posteriorly, the bone is removed beyond the sigmoid sinus, and the sinus is skeletonized. The extent of bone removal posterior to the sinus and decompression of the posterior fossa depends on the size of the tumor. Greater posterior removal provides greater exposure of the CPA. Superiorly, the middle fossa plate is identified and thinned. Anteriorly, the facial nerve is identified in its vertical segment but left covered with bone for protection against inadvertent burr trauma.

The second stage is complete labyrinthectomy. The horizontal, superior, and posterior semicircular canals are systematically removed. Particular care is required in working along the inferior border of the horizontal canal because of the proximity of the facial nerve, and along the ampulated end of the posterior canal because this end lies medial to the facial nerve.

The third stage of bone removal consists of actual decompression of the middle and posterior fossa dura and removal of bone around the internal auditory canal. The bone overlying the posterior fossa is removed with cutting and diamond burrs, except for an island of bone over the sigmoid sinus (“Bill’s island”). The mastoid emissary vein should be transected to permit retraction of the sinus and posterior fossa dura. Accordingly, bleeding from the emissary should be controlled with sutures, cautery, or bone wax. The petrous ridge, which is the junction between the middle fossa dura and the posterior fossa dura, should be removed. The superior petrosal sinus, which lies under the petrous ridge, is sometimes adherent to the bone. The resulting bleeding is controlled with bipolar cautery or extradural packing with oxidized cellulose strips (Surgicel). The entire middle fossa dura and posterior fossa dura adjacent to the mastoid are exposed.

The final stage of bone removal consists of skeletonization of the internal auditory canal. The orientation of this structure is roughly parallel to the external auditory canal. Thus, the fundus of the canal is just medial to the floor of the vestibule, which was exposed during the labyrinthectomy. By contrast, identification of the porus requires extensive bone removal as the internal auditory canal is dissected medially. The basic principle of exposing the internal auditory canal is that all bone removal should be accomplished before the dura is opened, and complete bone removal requires decompression of 270 degrees around the circumference of the canal to avoid obscuring any ledges of bone. By completing bone removal before opening the dura, the risk of accidental injury to the nerves of the internal auditory canal is minimized. The inferior border of the canal is skeletonized first. This edge of the canal is identified by gradually enlarging a trough between the inferior edge of the vestibule and the jugular bulb. The cochlear aqueduct usually is identified as the dissection proceeds anteromedially. This structure becomes the inferior limit of the dissection, thereby protecting the lower cranial nerves from injury. After the inferior border of the internal auditory canal has been identified, the bone overlying the porus acusticus is thinned with cutting and diamond burrs. The superior border of the canal is identified last, because the facial nerve is more susceptible to injury in this area. A burr size that will fit between the middle fossa dura and the superior border of the internal auditory canal is used to expose the superior border. The entrance of the facial nerve into the canal can be positively identified just medial to a vertical crest of bone, “Bill’s bar,” along the superior aspect of the fundus. At this point, the bony exposure has been completed, and tumor removal can begin (Fig. 177-28).

Tumor Removal

With small lesions, opening the dura of the internal auditory canal exposes the tumor. Attention is focused on the fundus of the canal, and an angled hook placed lateral to Bill’s bar is used to reflect the superior vestibular nerve inferiorly and then transect it. This maneuver protects the facial nerve and identifies the lateral plane between the facial nerve and the tumor. Sharp and blunt dissection can proceed with scissors and angled hooks from lateral to medial, but without actually placing traction on the facial nerve. With some small tumors, the dissection can be completed entirely without debulking.

With large tumors, CPA exposure is necessary. Intracapsular tumor debulking is completed before the tumor is dissected directly from the facial nerve. In essence, a large tumor is reduced to a small tumor. The dural flaps are developed carefully to avoid injury to the underlying petrosal vein or even branches of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery that can reach the dura. The incision is placed midway between the sigmoid sinus and the porus acusticus. The incision is carried directly to the porus and then continued in a curve around the porus.

Debulking should be accomplished to allow positive identification of the facial nerve medial to the tumor and to complete dissection of the tumor from the brainstem. Vessels that do not actually enter the tumor are reflected away, and the posterior aspect of the tumor is incised. Intracapsular debulking is accomplished with small dissection forceps, scissors, or a rotatory dissector (e.g., House-Urban dissector) or one of the power dissectors used in endoscopic sinus surgery. Some surgeons prefer to use the laser or ultrasonic aspirator for debulking. Such intracapsular debulking permits the tumor to collapse onto itself for easier manipulation during its dissection from the facial nerve. The arachnoid sheath that binds the tumor to the nerve anteriorly is released with small hooks.

In tumor dissection, it is important to avoid pushing the tumor medially into the CPA, because this maneuver stretches the nerve at its lateral fixed bony attachment. The tumor and capsule are removed by separating them completely from the facial nerve. Once tumor debulking is completed and the facial nerve is identified medially, attention is focused on the fundus of the internal auditory canal. Final tumor dissection proceeds as for a small tumor. In this manner, most of the tumor has been removed, while the facial nerve has been protected in the dura of the internal auditory canal.

After tumor removal, eustachian tube closure is achieved by removing the incus, transecting the tensor tympani tendon, and filling the eustachian tube with Surgicel. The temporalis muscle closes the eustachian tube. By opening the facial recess during drilling, the surgeon obtains wide exposure for eustachian tube occlusion. The edges of the dura are approximated with sutures, and the mastoidectomy defect is filled with strips of abdominal fat. The ends of the strips are placed through the dural defect to plug the dural opening. Cranioplasty with use of hydroxyapatite cement or titanium mesh is a useful technique to reduce the incidence of CSF fistula postoperatively and to enhance long-term wound healing and the cosmetic result.47,48 The wound is closed in layers, and a compressive dressing is applied.

Special Features

The translabyrinthine approach provides wide and direct access to CPA tumors with minimal cerebellar retraction. The versatility of this approach for large and small tumors makes it the most common approach for resection of acoustic neuromas.

The fundamental advantage of the translabyrinthine approach, particularly in medium-sized and large tumors, is that it permits positive identification of the facial nerve, laterally at the fundus and medially at the brainstem. Thus, the tumor can be dissected from either direction with optimal control of the facial nerve. Such medial and lateral identification of the nerve has permitted anatomic preservation of the facial nerve in greater than 98.5% of 759 acoustic neuromas removed in one large surgical series.49 Furthermore, if the facial nerve is transected, as occurs in cases of CPA facial nerve neuroma, the tympanic and mastoid portions of the nerve are available for rerouting and reanastomosis or grafting.

Properly performed, with wide exposure of the middle and posterior fossae, the translabyrinthine approach provides exposure of the CPA as good as with any other neurosurgical approach; however, the direct route of exposure of the CPA eliminates the need for cerebellar support (retraction).

The disadvantage of this approach is that hearing cannot be preserved. In a series of 300 consecutive cases of acoustic neuromas diagnosed before the advent of gadolinium-enhanced MRI, only 5% of patients, using the broadest criteria, could be considered candidates for hearing conservation surgery.50 The advent of gadolinium-enhanced MRI resulted in an increased percentage of acoustic neuromas among those detected, which are diagnosed at a small size before hearing is affected. Thus, hearing conservation procedures are becoming a more frequent consideration.

Retrosigmoid (Suboccipital) Approach

Technique

The soft tissues of the ear are reflected anteriorly and the muscles are widely reflected from the retromastoid region. Complete mastoidectomy is performed, and the sigmoid sinus is skeletonized and decompressed. The posterior semicircular canal also is skeletonized, and the posterior fossa dura up to the posterior semicircular canal is exposed. This area of exposed dura identifies the location of the posterior semicircular canal if the posterior lip of the internal auditory canal needs to be removed later in the procedure. A bone flap is removed posterior to the sigmoid sinus with the otologic drill. This flap can be preserved for replacement at the conclusion of the procedure. Alternatively, in cases with favorable venous anatomy, a craniectomy with skeletonization of the dura and sinus can be performed without entering the presigmoid mastoid air cells.

The dura is incised posterior to the sigmoid sinus, with care taken to avoid injury to the underlying vessels that may be adherent to the dura. Adequate drainage of CSF is necessary to minimize the need for cerebellar retraction. The cerebellum is exposed and supported with retractors to allow visualization of the tumor in the CPA. The neurosurgical techniques for tumor removal at the brainstem are the same regardless of the approach chosen. If the tumor is too large to permit proximal identification of the facial nerve, debulking of the tumor is performed. Once the debulking has been accomplished, the tumor is dissected from the facial nerve toward the porus acusticus (Fig. 177-30).

If the tumor extends into the internal auditory canal, the posterior lip of the canal is removed with diamond burrs. A dural flap is created lateral to the porus and reflected medially. Drilling of the posterior lip of the canal is continued until the lateral extent of the tumor is visualized. The anatomic limit for exposure of this posterior lip that will preserve hearing is the posterior semicircular canal. Attention to the area of dura previously exposed just posterior to the posterior semicircular canal will direct the surgeon to the precise location of the posterior canal when the posterior lip of the internal auditory canal is removed. Once the lateral limit of the tumor has been identified, tumor removal is accomplished in the same manner as with the translabyrinthine approach.

Unlike in the translabyrinthine approach, in which Bill’s bar permits definitive identification of the facial nerve at the fundus, in the retrosigmoid approach the surgeon relies primarily on the facial nerve monitor for identifying the nerve laterally in the internal auditory canal. Once the location of the nerves is known medially and laterally, the tumor usually can be removed with preservation of the facial nerve. With surgery attempting hearing preservation, the cochlear nerve also should be preserved. Particular care is taken to preserve the blood supply to the internal auditory canal, because hearing preservation depends on an intact blood supply.

After tumor removal, the edges of the dura are reapproximated, and the mastoid and the internal auditory canal are obliterated with abdominal fat. The bone flap is replaced and the wound is closed in separate layers. A compressive dressing is applied. Alternatively, fat with hydroxyapatite cement or titanium can be used.

Special Features

The retrosigmoid approach, in selected cases, offers an opportunity for hearing preservation, with success rates ranging from 30% to 65%, depending on the selection criteria used for hearing preservation surgery.5153 This approach is particularly useful for removal of CPA tumors smaller than 2 cm in patients with good hearing and limited involvement of the internal auditory canal. The principal limitation of this approach is that the fundus of the canal is not directly visualized. This approach is being used more frequently as small tumors of the CPA are diagnosed with enhanced MRI and minimal auditory symptoms.

Extension of tumor to the fundus is a relative contraindication to use of the retrosigmoid approach for hearing preservation. With the retrosigmoid approach, tumor removal in the fundus is accomplished by “feel” with hooks or indirect visualization with mirrors and endoscopes. This approach risks leaving residual tumor.

Bill’s bar in the fundus of the internal auditory canal cannot be used to identify the facial nerve laterally in the retrosigmoid approach. Thus, this step is more difficult in the retrosigmoid approach and relies more heavily on the nerve monitor. Although the rates of facial nerve preservation are comparable for the translabyrinthine and the retrosigmoid techniques, in our experience, facial nerve preservation rates are better with the translabyrinthine approach because it allows positive identification of the facial nerve in medial and lateral directions.52,54,55

A 10% incidence of severe postoperative headaches has been reported with this approach.56 This symptom may be related to the intradural spread of bone dust, which occurs as a result of drilling the posterior lip of the internal auditory canal. Unlike in the translabyrinthine approach, drilling should be intradural in the retrosigmoid approach. Replacing the retrosigmoid bone flap with microplates or cranioplasty with synthetic materials has reduced the incidence of headaches with retrosigmoid surgery, suggesting that scar and muscle adherence to the dura also is an important factor.

Another objection to use of this approach has been the need for cerebellar retraction. Skeletonizing the sigmoid sinus and reflecting it anteriorly can minimize cerebellar retraction. However, medium-sized and large lesions require significantly more cerebellar retraction than is necessary with the translabyrinthine approach. Nonetheless, the retrosigmoid approach offers the most panoramic view of the posterior fossa.

Middle Fossa Approach

Technique

The basic surgical exposure is illustrated in Figure 177-32A and B. Mannitol and furosemide are used in addition to hyperventilation for brain relaxation. A lumbar drain placed at the beginning of the procedure can facilitate dural elevation before open drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid. A preauricular incision is extended along the temporal region. The temporalis muscle may be reflected inferiorly or split and retracted to expose the squamosa of the temporal bone. A 5 cm × 5 cm craniotomy is centered over the zygomatic root.

The floor of the middle fossa is exposed by dissecting and elevating the dura from posterior to anterior to avoid injury to the geniculate ganglion, which can be dehiscent in up to 15% of patients. The principal landmarks for orientation are the greater superficial petrosal nerve and the arcuate eminence; however, these can be deceptive. Antidromic stimulation of the greater superficial petrosal nerve with the facial nerve stimulator can be helpful for orientation.58 In addition, preoperative coronal CT can reveal the extent of pneumatization over the internal auditory canal and labyrinth.

Surgeons should be familiar with all techniques for identifying the internal auditory canal in middle fossa surgery, but some prefer to begin drilling medially near the porus acusticus. In this fashion, the cochlea and superior semicircular canal are not approached until the internal auditory canal has been identified. Wide skeletonization of this canal can be performed medially; however, the proximity of the cochlea and superior semicircular canal only permit unroofing the internal auditory canal laterally.

The dura is opened along the posterior aspect of the internal auditory canal. The facial nerve is freed from the tumor, and dissection proceeds in a medial to lateral direction. The canal is sealed with abdominal fat or temporalis muscle and the bone flap is replaced.

Retrolabyrinthine Approach

Indications

The principal indication for the retrolabyrinthine approach is vestibular nerve section for intractable vertigo or for neurotomy in tic douloureux.60 With posterior fossa neoplasms, the retrolabyrinthine approach affords adequate exposure and hearing preservation in selected cases of arachnoid cysts, meningiomas, and metastatic lesions of the CPA. In situations in which tissue diagnosis is required before proceeding with definitive surgery, the retrolabyrinthine approach permits wide exposure with minimal morbidity for exploration of lesions of the CPA.

Technique

The incision and soft tissue exposure for the retrolabyrinthine approach are identical to those for the translabyrinthine approach. Mannitol and furosemide are used for brain relaxation. A complete mastoidectomy is performed. The fossa incudis and the lateral and posterior semicircular canals are identified. The facial nerve is skeletonized but kept covered with bone.

Because exposure with this approach depends on collapsing the sigmoid sinus posteriorly, bone is completely removed from the sigmoid sinus and the subocciput posterior to the sinus. Extensive exposure of the retrosigmoid dura is necessary for adequate exposure with this approach. The middle fossa dura is exposed and the petrous ridge is removed to increase the exposure.

The dura is opened as a flap that begins just medial to the sigmoid sinus and preserves the endolymphatic sac. The flap is held anteriorly with sutures and tumor dissection can be performed in the posterior fossa (Fig. 177-34). Once the CPA is entered and CSF is released, the cerebellum falls away. Accordingly, cerebellar retractors are not necessary to expose the cranial nerves in the CPA. Instead, the sigmoid is collapsed posteriorly with fenestrated suction.

When tumor removal is completed, the dura is closed with sutures. The defect is obliterated with abdominal fat with the optional use of hydroxyapatite cement or titanium mesh. Closure is performed in layers, and a compressive dressing is applied.

Transcochlear Approach

Indications

Petroclival meningiomas and epidermoids of the petrous tip are the principal lesions for which the transcochlear approach has been applied.61 However, extensions of this approach have been used with glomus jugulare tumors, temporal bone carcinomas, and extensive nonacoustic neuromas of the CPA.

Technique

The incision, soft tissue exposure, complete mastoidectomy, labyrinthectomy, posterior and middle fossa dura decompression, and skeletonization of the internal auditory canal are performed as in the translabyrinthine approach.

The facial nerve is decompressed from the stylomastoid foramen to the geniculate ganglion. After sectioning of the chorda tympani nerve using an extended facial recess approach and transection of the greater superficial petrosal nerve, the facial nerve can be transposed posteriorly. Transposition of the nerve removes the obstacle to extending the exposure anteriorly. The transcochlear approach has been modified to include transection of the external auditory canal and two-layered closure of the meatus. This modification permits removal of the posterior wall of the external auditory canal, thus allowing wider anterior exposure in the areas of the jugular bulb and internal carotid artery. Next, the incus and stapes are removed. The cochlea is removed, thereby exposing the carotid artery anteriorly, the jugular bulb and inferior petrosal sinus inferiorly, and the superior petrosal sinus superiorly. The bony exposure leaves a dura-covered window extending from the superior petrosal sinus to the inferior petrosal sinus and reaching the clivus medially (Fig. 177-36).

The same principles of tumor removal are used as with the other approaches to the CPA. However, the position of the facial nerve in relation to the tumor and the proximity of the basilar artery make certain aspects of tumor removal with the transcochlear approach different from other approaches to the CPA. Unlike acoustic neuromas, tumors of the petrous apex and clivus often have the facial nerve on their posterior surface. Thus, the nerve should be dissected free of the tumor and protected. The position of the vertebrobasilar arterial system should be considered. As tumor dissection proceeds medially, the basilar artery will be anterosuperior and the vertebral artery will be posteroinferior. Extensive tumors that cross the midline are removed by reflecting the vessels posteriorly from the tumor capsule. Particular care is taken to preseve small perforating vessels that supply the brainstem, because their damage could be fatal. The surgical defect is filled with abdominal fat (often with hydroxyapatite or titanium mesh, or both), the wound is closed in layers, and a compressive dressing is applied.

Transotic Approach

Indications

The transotic approach is indicated for removal of lesions of the CPA extending inferiorly into the jugular foramen or anteriorly into the clivus. Some proponents of this approach use the additional exposure anteriorly in cases of high jugular bulbs or anteriorly placed sigmoid sinuses in small to medium-sized acoustic neuromas.62 The translabyrinthine approach with wide decompression of the sigmoid sinus and posterior fossa dura provides adequate exposure of the internal auditory canal and CPA, even with large acoustic neuromas with unfavorable venous anatomy.

Extended Middle Fossa Approach

Experimental Approaches

Attempted hearing preservation with partial or complete labyrinthine resection has been reported. McElveen64 and Molony65 and their colleagues reported systematic sealing of the vestibule during labyrinthectomy with successful hearing preservation after translabyrinthine tumor removal. To expose the lateral internal auditory canal with the retrosigmoid approach, Arriaga and Gorum66 reported posterior semicircular canal resection with successful hearing preservation and total tumor removal in two of three enhanced retrosigmoid procedures. In extensive skull base lesions, labyrinthine procedures can be converted to partial labyrinthine resection procedures with concomitant opportunity for preserved hearing.67

Although these findings are promising, such techniques are currently experimental, and further investigation is necessary for such approaches to be offered routinely in clinical practice.

Approaches for Skull Base Lesions Requiring Drainage

As described earlier in this chapter, cholesterol granulomas are nonneoplastic lesions that may expand the petrous apex and produce symptoms related to the nerves of the posterior fossa. Similarly, mucoceles of the petrous apex may produce symptoms by their expansion. Both lesions are adequately managed by surgical drainage.

Transcanal Infracochlear Approach

The external auditory canal is transected and a superiorly based tympanomeatal flap is elevated. The bony external meatus is widened, and the air cell tract between the jugular bulb and carotid artery is followed into the petrous apex (Fig. 177-41). This approach permits dependent drainage of the petrous apex into the middle ear (see Fig. 177-14). If the drainage tube becomes obstructed, it may be revised through an office myringotomy. The principal disadvantages are the prolonged healing time required for the external auditory canal and the need for direct exposure of the petrous carotid artery.42

Selection of Surgical Approach

The rationale for selecting a particular surgical approach for acoustic neuromas is similar to that for other posterior fossa neoplasms. The principal goal is tumor removal with minimal postoperative morbidity. Accordingly, the surgical approach should be tailored to the patient’s specific pathology and functional status. The notion that a single approach should be used with all lesions of the posterior fossa is counterintuitive and subjects patients to unnecessary morbidity. In patients without serviceable hearing, the translabyrinthine approach provides wide and direct access to the CPA, with maximal facial nerve safety, minimal cerebellar retraction, and a low incidence of severe postoperative headache.

Patients with small tumors and good hearing have three options for surgical removal: the translabyrinthine approach, which destroys hearing; the middle fossa approach in young patients with small, mainly intracanalicular tumors; and the retrosigmoid approach in small tumors of the CPA that do not extend to the fundus of the internal auditory canal. In general, the best hearing and functional outcomes result from individualizing the surgical approach to patient and tumor characteristics.69

Realistic patient counseling is necessary regarding hearing conservation procedures. Gardner and Robertson51 rigorously reviewed the literature on hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. Of 621 reported cases of attempted hearing preservation, the success rate was 33%. Reported successful hearing preservation rates often refer only to measurable hearing. The rate is far lower if useful hearing (speech reception threshold [SRT] greater than 30 dB and speech discrimination less than 70%) or serviceable hearing (SRT greater than 50 dB and speech discrimination less than 50%) is considered. Furthermore, long-term follow-up studies reveal that 56% of patients experience significant loss of the preserved hearing over time.59

After a discussion of the risks and benefits of the various surgical approaches, many potential candidates for hearing preservation choose the translabyrinthine approach, with its slightly higher rate of facial nerve preservation, rather than hearing conservation procedures.

With meningiomas and tumors that do not affect the internal auditory canal and have not impaired hearing, the extended middle fossa approach is used if posterior and middle fossa exposure is necessary. The retrolabyrinthine approach is used for removal of limited lesions of the CPA only, whereas the retrosigmoid approach would be applicable for resection of more extensive lesions of the posterior fossa. Extensive anteromedial exposure is needed with lesions of the clivus. Hearing preservation usually is not feasible in treatment of such lesions, and the transcochlear or transotic approach may be used.

Patient Management and Surgical Complications

Comprehensive management of patients with skull base neoplasms of the posterior fossa requires a team of specialists familiar with the particular needs of this patient group. In addition to neuro-otologists and neurosurgeons, designated internists, anesthesiologists, radiologists, ophthalmologists,70 and critical care nurses are essential members of the team for optimal care of these patients with very specialized needs.

Complications

Facial Nerve Injury

Facial nerve transection ideally is managed by immediate repair or with an interposition graft.74 In the translabyrinthine approach, access to the middle ear and mastoid portions of the nerve can provide a longer distal segment to ensure a tension-free anastomosis.75 In cases in which direct repair is impossible or in which an intact nerve does not resume function within 1 year, the facial hypoglossal anastomosis provides reliable facial reanimation.76 Temporalis muscle transfer is an alternative technique for reanimation of the paralyzed face that offers the benefit of immediate effects.

SUGGESTED READINGS

Arriaga MA, Chen DA. Hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty in translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126:512.

Arriaga MA, Luxford WM, Atkins JSJr, et al. Predicting long-term facial nerve outcome following acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;108:220.

Arriaga MA. Petrous apex effusion: a clinical disoder. Laryngoscope. 2007;116:1349.

Atkinson WJ. The anterior inferior cerebellar artery: its variations, pontine distribution and significance in the surgery of cerebellopontine angle tumors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1949;12:137.

Brackmann DE, Anderson RG. Cholesteatomas of the cerebellopontine angle. In: Silverstein H, Norrell H, editors. Neurological Surgery of the Ear. Birmingham, Ala: Aesculapius Publishing; 1979:54-63.

Brackmann DE, Bartels LJ. Rare tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1980;88:555.

Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE. Retrolabyrinthine approach: technique and newer indications. Laryngoscope. 1978;88:286.

Brackmann DE, Kwartler JA. A review of acoustic tumors: 1983-1988. Am J Otol. 1990;11:216.

Carrier D, Arriaga MA. Cost-effective evaluation of asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss with focused magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;116:567.

Daspit P, Spetzler R. The petrosal approach in otologic surgery. In: Brackmann DE, Shelton C, Arriaga MA, editors. Otologic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994:677-690.

Don M, Masuda A, Nelson R, et al. Successful detection of small acoustic tumors using the stacked derived-band auditory brainstem response amplitude. Am J Otol. 1997;18:608.

Gardner G, Robertson JH. Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988;97:55.

Giddings NA, Brackmann DE, Kwartler JA. Transcanal infracochlear approach to the petrous apex. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;104:29.

Glasscock ME, Steenerson RL. A history of acoustic tumor surgery 1961-present. In: House WF, Leutje CM, editors. Acoustic Tumors. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979:33-44.

House WF. Translabyrinthine approach. In: House WF, Leutje CM, editors. Acoustic Tumors. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979:43-88.

House WF, De la Cruz A, Hitselberger WE. Surgery of the skull base: transcochlear approach to the petrous apex and clivus. Otolaryngology. 1978;86:770.

Jackler RK, Cho M. A new theory to explain the genesis of petrous apex cholesterol granuluma. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24:94.

Janecka IP, Sekhar LN, Horton JA, et al. General blood flow evaluation. Update II. Cummings CW, Frederickson JM, Harker JM, et al, editors. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. St Louis: Mosby. 1990:54-63.

Kevanishvili Z. The detection of small acoustic tumors: the stacked derived-band ABR procedure. [Comment on Am J Otol. 1997;18:608.]. Am J Otol. 2000;21:148.

Lo WM. Tumors of the temporal bone and cerebellopontine angle. In: Som PM, Bergeron RT, editors. Head and Neck Imaging. St Louis: Mosby; 1991:420-445.

McElveen JTJr, Wilkins RH, Erwin AC, et al. Modifying the translabyrinthine approach to preserve hearing during acoustic tumor surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105:34.

Samii M, Turel KE, Penkert G. Management of seventh and eighth nerve involvement by cerebellopontine angle tumors. Clin Neurosurg. 1985;32:242.

Sekhar LN, Jannetta PJ. Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas: microsurgical excision and follow-up results. J Neurosurg. 1984;60:500.

Selters WA, Brackmann DE. Acoustic tumor detection with brainstem electric response audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1977;103:181.

Shelton C, Hitselberger WE, House WF, et al. Hearing preservation after acoustic tumor removal: long-term results. Laryngoscope. 1990;100:115.

Thomsen J, Tos M, Harmsen A. Acoustic neuroma surgery: results of translabyrinthine removal in 300 patients. Discussion of choice of approach in relation to overall results and possibility of hearing preservation. Br J Neurosurg. 1989;3:349.

CHAPTER 177 REFERENCES

1. Brackmann DE, Bartels LJ. Rare tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1980;88:555.

2. Valvanis A, Schubiger O, Naidich TP. Clinical Imaging of the Cerebellopontine Angle. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1986.

3. Martuza RL, Eldridge R. Neurofibromatosis 2 (bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis). N Engl J Med. 1988;318:684.

4. Brackmann DE, Gherini SE. Differential diagnosis of skull base neoplasms involving the posterior fossa. In: Cummings CW, Frederickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE, editors. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. St Louis: Mosby; 1986:3421-3436.

5. House WF. Translabyrinthine approach. In: House WF, Leutje CM, Doyle KJ, editors. Acoustic Tumors. San Diego: Singular Publishing; 1997:171-176.

6. Johnson EW. Results of auditory tests in acoustic tumor patients. In: House WF, Luetje CM, editors. Acoustic Tumors. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979:209-224.

7. Kasantikul V, Netsky MG, Glasscock ME3rd, et al. Acoustic neurilemmoma: clinicoanatomical study of 103 patients. J Neurosurg. 1980;52:28.

8. Sataloff RT, Davies B, Myers DL. Acoustic neuromas presenting as sudden deafness. Am J Otol. 1985;6:349.

9. Beatty CW, Ebersold MJ, Harner SG. Residual and recurrent acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope. 1987;97:1168.

10. Jerger J, Oliver TA, Jenkins H. Suprathreshold abnormalities of the stapedius reflex in acoustic tumors: a series of case reports. Ear Hear. 1987;8:131.

11. Carrier D, Arriaga MA. Cost-effective evaluation of asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss with focused magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;116:567.

12. Brackmann DE, Kwartler JA. A review of acoustic tumors: 1983-1988. Am J Otol. 1990;11:216.

13. Selters WA, Brackmann DE. Acoustic tumor detection with brainstem electric response audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1977;103:181.

14. Wilson D, Hodgson RS, Gustafson MF, et al. The sensitivity of auditory brainstem response testing in small acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:961.

15. Chandrasekhar SS, Brackmann DE, Devgan KK. Utility of auditory brainstem response audiometry in diagnosis of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol. 1995;16:63.

16. Kevanishvili Z. The detection of small acoustic tumors: the stacked derived-band ABR procedure. [Comment on Am J Otol. 1997;18:608.]. Am J Otol. 2000;21:148.

17. Don M, Masuda A, Nelson R, et al. Successful detection of small acoustic tumors using the stacked derived-band auditory brainstem response amplitude. Am J Otol. 1997;18:608.

18. Linthicum FHJr, Waldorf R, Luxford WM, et al. Infrared/video ENG recording of eye movements to evaluate the inferior vestibular nerve using the minimal caloric test. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;98:207.

19. Lo WM. Tumors of the temporal bone and cerebellopontine angle. In: Som PM, Bergeron RT, editors. Head and Neck Imaging. St Louis: Mosby; 1991:420-445.

20. Segall HD, Zee CS, Naidich TP, et al. Computed tomography in neoplasms of the posterior fossa in children. Radiol Clin North Am. 1982;20:237.

21. Press GA, Hesselink JR. MR imaging of cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal lesions at 1.5T. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:1371.

22. Jackler RK, Shapiro MS, Dillon WP, et al. Gadolinium-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;102:67.

23. Barrs DM, Luxford WM, Becker TS, et al. Computed tomography with gas cisternography for detection of small acoustic tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1984;110:535.

24. Shelton C, Harnsberger HR, Allen R, et al. Fast spin echomagnetic resonance imaging: clinical applications in screening for acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114:71.

25. Rubenstein LJ. Tumors of the central nervous system. Second Series, Fascicle 6. Firminger HI, editor. Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 1972:1-400.

26. Langman AW, Jackler RK, Althaus SR. Meningioma of the internal auditory canal. Am J Otol. 1990;11:201.

27. Elster AD, Challa VR, Gilbert TH, et al. Meningiomas: MR and histopathologic features. Radiology. 1989;170:857.

28. Russell DS, Rubenstein LJ. Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System, 4th ed. Edinburgh: T & A Constable; 1977.

29. Sekhar LN, Jannetta PJ. Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas: microsurgical excision and follow-up results. J Neurosurg. 1984;60:500.

30. Brackmann DE, Anderson RG. Cholesteatomas of the cerebellopontine angle. In: Silverstein H, Norrell H, editors. Neurological Surgery of the Ear. Birmingham, Ala: Aesculapius Publishing; 1979:340-344.

31. Garcia CA, McGarry PA, Rodriguez F. Primary intracranial squamous cell carcinoma of the right cerebellopontine angle. J Neurosurg. 1981;54:824.

32. Dort JC, Fisch U. Facial nerve schwannomas. Skull Base Surg. 1991;1:51.

33. Syms CA3rd, House JR3rd, Luxford WM, et al. Preoperative electroneuronography and facial nerve outcome in acoustic neuroma surgery. Am J Otol. 1997;18:401.

34. Kartush JM, Niparko JK, Graham MD, et al. Electroneurography: preoperative facial nerve assessment for tumors of the temporal bone. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;97:257.

35. McCormick PC, Bello JA, Post KD. Trigeminal schwannoma. Surgical series of 14 cases with review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1988;69:850.

36. Spector GJ, Sobol S, Thawley SE, et al. Glomus jugulare tumors of the temporal bone: patterns of invasion of the temporal bone. Laryngoscope. 1979;89:1628.

37. Janecka IP, Sekhar LN, Horton JA, et al. General blood flow evaluation. Update II. Cummings CW, Frederickson JM, Harker JM, et al, editors. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. St Louis: Mosby. 1990:54-63.

38. Haberkamp TJ, Monsell EM, House WF, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of arachnoid cysts of the posterior fossa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;103:612.

39. Pappas DG, Brackmann DE. Arachnoid cysts of the posterior fossa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1981;89:328.

40. Balkany T, Fradis M, Jafek BW, et al. Hemangioma of the facial nerve: role of the geniculate capillary plexus. Skull Base Surg. 1991;1:59.

41. Jackler RK, Cho M. A new theory to explain the genesis of petrous apex cholesterol granuluma. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24:94-106.

42. Giddings NA, Brackmann DE, Kwartler JA. Transcanal infracochlear approach to the petrous apex. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;104:29.

43. Arriaga MA. Petrous apex effusion: a clinical disorder. Laryngoscope. 2007;116:1349.

44. Arriaga MA, Lo WW, Brackmann DE. Clinical and imaging characteristics of metastatic melanoma to the cerebellopontine angle. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:1052.

45. Batsakis JG. Tumors of the Head and Neck, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1979.

46. Glasscock ME, Steenerson RL. A history of acoustic tumor surgery 1961-present. In: House WF, Leutje CM, editors. Acoustic Tumors. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979:33-34.

47. Arriaga MA, Chen DA. Hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty in translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126:512.

48. Arriaga MA, Chen DA, Burke EL. Hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty in translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma surgery—update. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:538.

49. Arriaga MA, Luxford WM, Atkins JSJr, et al. Predicting long-term facial nerve outcome following acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;108:220.

50. Thomsen J, Tos M, Harmsen A. Acoustic neuroma surgery: results of translabyrinthine removal in 300 patients. Discussion of choice of approach in relation to overall results and possibility of hearing preservation. Br J Neurosurg. 1989;3:349.

51. Gardner G, Robertson JH. Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988;97:55.

52. Harner SG, Beatty CW, Ebersold MJ. Retrosigmoid removal of acoustic neuroma: experience 1978-1988. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;103:40.

53. Kemink JL, LaRouere MJ, Kileny PR, et al. Hearing preservation following suboccipital removal of acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope. 1990;100:597.

54. Devriese PP, van der Werf AJ, van der Borden J. Facial nerve function after suboccipital removal of acoustic neurinoma. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;240:193.

55. Samii M, Turel KE, Penkert G. Management of seventh and eighth nerve involvement by cerebellopontine angle tumors. Clin Neurosurg. 1985;32:242.

56. Silverstein HE, Norrell H, Wanamaker H, et al. Microsurgical posterior fossa vestibular neurectomy: an evolution in technique. Skull Base Surg. 1991;1:16.

57. Gadre AK, Kwartler JA, Brackmann DE, et al. Middle fossa decompression of the internal auditory canal in acoustic neuroma surgery: a therapeutic alternative. Laryngoscope. 1990;100:948.

58. Arriaga MA, Haid RT, Masel DA. Antidromic stimulation of the greater superficial petrosal nerve (GSPN) in middle fossa surgery. Laryngoscope. 1995;105:102.

59. Shelton C, Hitselberger WE, House WF, et al. Hearing preservation after acoustic tumor removal: long-term results. Laryngoscope. 1990;100:115.

60. Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE. Retrolabyrinthine approach: technique and newer indications. Laryngoscope. 1978;88:286.

61. House WF, De la Cruz A, Hitselberger WE. Surgery of the skull base: transcochlear approach to the petrous apex and clivus. Otolaryngology. 1978;86:770.

62. Jenkins HA, Fisch U. The transotic approach to resection of difficult acoustic tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Am J Otol. 1980;2:70.

63. Daspit P, Spetzler R. The petrosal approach in otologic surgery. In: Brackmann DE, Shelton C, Arriaga MA, editors. Otologic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994:677-690.

64. McElveen JTJr, Wilkins RH, Erwin AC, et al. Modifying the translabyrinthine approach to preserve hearing during acoustic tumor surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105:34.

65. Molony TB, Kwartler JA, House WF, et al. Extended middle fossa and retrolabyrinthine approaches in acoustic neuroma surgery: case reports. Am J Otol. 1992;13:360.

66. Arriaga MA, Gorum M. Enhanced retrosigmoid exposure with posterior semicircular canal resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;115:46.

67. Hirsch BE, Cass SP, Sekhar LN, et al. Translabyrinthine approach to skull base tumors with hearing preservation. Am J Otol. 1993;14:533.

68. Gherini SG, Brackmann DE, Lo WW, et al. Cholesterol granuloma of the petrous apex. Laryngoscope. 1985;95:659.

69. Arriaga MA, Chen DA, Fukushima T. Individualizing hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:1043.

70. Levine RE. Management of the eye after acoustic tumor surgery. In: House WF, Leutje CM, editors. Acoustic Tumors. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979:105-152.

71. Morawski KF, Niemczyk K, Bohorquez J, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of hearing during cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery using transtympanic electrosochleography. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:541.

72. Atkinson WJ. The anterior inferior cerebellar artery: its variations, pontine distribution and significance in the surgery of cerebellopontine angle tumors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1949;12:137.

73. Brow RE. Pre- and postoperative management of the acoustic tumor patient. In: House WF, Leutje CM, editors. Acoustic Tumors. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979:153-174.

74. Arriaga MA, Brackmann DE. The technique and outcome of facial nerve repair in cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery. Am J Otol. 1992;13:356.

75. Barrs DM, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE. Facial nerve anastomosis in the cerebellopontine angle: a review of 24 cases. Am J Otol. 1984;5:269.

76. Luxford WM, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve substitution: a review of sixty-six cases. Am J Otol Suppl. 1985:55.