Neck Rejuvenation

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1645 times

Chapter 10 Neck Rejuvenation

Loss of neck contour, especially at the cervicomental and cervicomandibular angles, is a common sign of aging. Procedures to rejuvenate the face and neck are among the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedures in the United States. The delineation of the cervicomandibular angle is an important factor in facial harmony and an overall youthful appearance. 1,2 Rejuvenation of the aging neck gives a more pleasing appearance to the soft tissues in that area, and can cause the face to appear more youthful as well. The goal is to provide an even, smooth platysmal layer that closely invests the thyroid cartilage, hyoid, and floor of the mouth. Procedures to lift and redefine the jaw line and submental region are often used as adjuncts to rhytidectomy.

Introduction

Loss of neck contour, especially at the cervicomental and cervicomandibular angles, is a common sign of aging. Procedures to rejuvenate the face and neck are among the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedures in the United States. The delineation of the cervicomandibular angle is an important factor in facial harmony and an overall youthful appearance.1,2 Rejuvenation of the aging neck gives a more pleasing appearance to the soft tissues in that area, and can cause the face to appear more youthful as well. The goal is to provide an even, smooth platysmal layer that closely invests the thyroid cartilage, hyoid, and floor of the mouth. Procedures to lift and redefine the jaw line and submental region are often used as adjuncts to rhytidectomy.

Anatomy and effects of aging

Traditionally, facial rejuvenation techniques have involved repositioning of portions of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) and skin. In the neck the SMAS blends with the platysma fascia to form a continuous sheet.3 Here, signs of cervicofacial aging are initially manifest as faint vertical platysmal bands overlying the thyroid cartilage and hyoid. These then progress to longer, more pronounced bands as more support is lost from the retaining ligaments and the platysma descends further.4 The laxity of the platysma causes a cervical obliquity, which is compounded by supra- and subplatysmal fat deposits. Subplatysmal fat can exacerbate the development of cervicomental angle obliquity. Submandibular gland ptosis may contribute to cervical fullness as well, supplying bulk laterally, below the angle of the mandible. The end result of these processes is a neck with a prematurely aged appearance.

Indications

Indications include young patients with a prematurely aged neck, or patients with the neck as a prominent aspect of facial aging. Other indications include those patients undergoing other aesthetic facial surgical procedures which otherwise accentuate the neck laxity.

Submandibular fullness results from increased glandular ptosis as muscular and fascial support of the gland weakens or glandular hypertrophy. SMAS plication in rhytidectomy or platysmal suspension may indirectly address this fullness because these techniques reestablish fascial support, but they have not proven helpful long term. However, residual submandibular gland ptosis often persists after platysmal, cervical fat, and skin laxity surgical objectives have been met, and tightening of the overlying tissues may accentuate the deformity.

Patients with lesser degrees of submandibular gland fullness may benefit from suspension, whereas those with very significant submandibular gland ptosis or hypertrophy may be candidates for partial resection.6 The idea of aesthetics as an indication for submandibular gland resection, which is a technically challenging operation, is controversial.2,7 The primary criticism for resecting the gland is the risk of nerve injury. Prior to their widespread acceptance, SMAS-rhytidectomy techniques were similarly criticized for their risk to the facial nerve. Through multiple studies documenting the anatomy of the facial nerve and refining the surgical approach to it, SMAS procedures were accepted. Similar studies of the submandibular gland have been undertaken, but controversies remain.4 All of the nerves in the area of the gland, with the exception of the autonomic plexus, are found exterior to its capsule.

Operative Approach

Intravenous sedation and injection of lidocaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine is sufficient for most patients, even those who undergo partial or complete removal of the submaxillary glands. The standard protocol includes a thorough betadine prep of the neck and oral cavity followed by intraoral administration of local anesthesia to block the area.

Neck exposure is gained through an inconspicuous 3.5 cm submental incision in the shadow posterior to the submental skin crease. This allows access to the platysmal plane. Laterally the neck is approached through a conventional pre- and posterior auricular rhytidectomy incision, if rhytidectomy is part of the goal. This gives good visualization along the inferior border of the mandible, and provides an avenue for directly visualized suction lipectomy of the lateral neck.

SMAS suspension and platysmal plication

Rhytidectomy in conjunction with a neck lift can provide further suspension of the soft tissues of the lateral neck. This is accomplished by the changed vector that results from the transposition of a vertical strip of preauricular SMAS to an anchor point in the retroauricular area. The lift is thereby changed from a vertical one to a more attractive line along the angle of the mandible, with a hammock effect.

The excess tissue is then resected and the edges reapproximated with an interrupted or running suture (Fig. 10.1). Alternatively, the platysmal borders are overlapped in vest-over-the-pants fashion. Non-absorbable suture is used for the muscle repair.

Subplatysmal fat resection

A subset of patients in whom the midline subplatysmal fat is the only feature of aging in the cervicofacial area can benefit from a subplatysmal fat resection and platysmaplasty alone, requiring only a submental incision.8 This has proved particularly beneficial in some young patients. The submental incision gives good exposure medially, but most patients have additional aspects of the aging neck that also require lateral approaches. Although some patients benefit from suction lipectomy alone,9 most benefit from platysmal procedures or subplatysmal fat resection.
Vertical separation of the platysmal decussation in the midline allows visualization of the subplatysmal fat deposit (Fig. 10.2). The fat interposed between the platysma and the anterior bellies of the digastric muscles is conservatively resected with cautery. Open or closed liposuction techniques may be useful adjuncts to neck contouring provided they are used selectively.10 Most cervical adipose tissue is contoured using long facelift scissors.
Some authors recommend resection of the anterior digastric muscle bellies if there is residual fullness11,12 – the muscle is isolated and gently detached from the caudal border of the mandible using electrocautery. There is a well-defined plane between the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and the mylohoid muscle leaving some muscle fibers on the bone. The anterior belly of the digastric muscle is pulled caudally and the muscle is partially or completely removed. Meticulous hemostasis is essential.

Submandibular gland suspension and resection

The medial to lateral approach to the gland is recommended because it maximally avoids the marginal mandibular nerve, and allows a caudal approach to the gland within the capsule.13 Trying to approach the gland via the submental approach is technically difficult due to limited access and the presence of variant blood supply.

Submandibular resection may be a difficult procedure, but can produce dramatic results in selected patients. Codner and Nahai found that submandibular resection was carried out more often in patients undergoing secondary rather than primary rhytidectomies.11 The resection can be done after careful isolation of the gland, ligation of the facial branches entering the gland and Stenon’s duct. Partial removal can be accomplished with electrocautery.

Submaxillary glands should not be removed from patients who have xerostomia or who wear dentures.

Suction drains using TLS vacuum system may minimize the collection of blood or seromas in the neck.

References

1. De Pina D.P. Diagnosis and technical refinements in rhytidectomy: a personal approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1987;1:7-14.

2. De Pina D.P., Quinta W.C. Aesthetic resection of the submandibular salivary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;5:779-787.

3. Gardetto A., Dabernig J., Rainer C., et al. Does a superficial musculoaponeurotic system exist in the neck? An anatomic study by the tissue plastination technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):664-672.

4. Stuzin J.M., Baker T.J. Aging face and neck. In: Stephen Mathes, editor. Plastic surgery. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006:159-214.

5. Sullivan P.K., Freeman M.B., Schmidt S. Contouring the aging neck with submandibular gland suspension. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;26(4):465-471.

6. Marten T.J. Submandibular gland resection in rejuvenation of the aging neck. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, May 2001.

7. Baker D.C. Face lift with submandibular gland and digastric muscle resection: radical neck rhytidectomy. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;26:85-92.

8. Zins J.E., Fardo D. The ‘anterior-only’ approach to neck rejuvenation: an alternative to facelift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(6):1761-1768.

9. Goddio A.S. Skin retraction following suction lipectomy by treatment site: a study of 500 procedures in 458 selected subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(1):66-75.

10. Adamson P.A., Cormier R., Tropper G.J., et al. Cervicofacial liposuction: results and controversies. J Otolaryngol. 1991;19(4):267-273.

11. Codner M.C., Nahai F. Submandibular gland I: an anatomic evaluation and surgical approach to submandibular gland resection for facial rejuvenation. Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(4):1155-1156.

12. Connell B.F., Shamoun J.M. The significance of digastric muscle contouring for rejuvenation of the submental area of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(6):1586-1590.

13. Singer D.P., Sullivan P.K. Submandibular gland I: an anatomic evaluation and surgical approach to submandibular gland resection for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(4):1150-1154.

14. Ballenger J.J., Snow J.B. Otolaryngology head and neck surgery, 15th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996.

15. Cummings C.W. Otolaryngology head and neck surgery, 3rd edn. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1998.

16. Ramirez O.M. Comprehensive approach to rejuvenation of the neck. Facial Plast Surg. 2001;17:129-140.

17. Sinha U.K., Ng M. Surgery of the salivary gland. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999;32:887-906.

Feldman J.J. Corset platysmaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:333.