Muscles

Published on 12/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Neurology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2901 times

16 Muscles

Introduction

Muscle weakness is often automatically thought to reflect muscle disease, but that need not be the case. Weak or wasted muscles may result from a lesion anywhere within the nervous system. This starts from the central nervous system (CNS), which produces a typical upper motor neurone (UMN) distribution of weakness. UMN weakness results in the compensatory ‘spastic’ posturing (see Ch 4) consequent to weakness in the antigravity muscles. Damage to lower motor neurones (LMN) will produce weakness in those muscles innervated by the affected LMNs (see Ch 4).

It is possible to get a combination of UMN and LMN weakness that may be caused by motor neurone disease (MND) or vitamin B12 deficiency, as seen in subacute combined degeneration.

More peripheral involvement as evidenced by diseases affecting the neuro-muscular junction, typified by myasthenia gravis, will produce muscular weakness or fatigability. Diseases affecting muscles themselves also cause muscle weakness and wasting.

Perhaps the best and most obvious example of how a lesion at different points in the ‘nerve-to-muscle’ relationship can result in a similar picture is reflected in the presentation of ptosis. This may be caused by nerve damage (be it 3rd cranial nerve or autonomic nerve damage), damage at the neuromuscular junction (as seen in myasthenia gravis), or long-standing muscle disease (especially with mitochondrial myopathy) (see Table 16.1).

TABLE 16.1 Identification of causes of ptosis

Cause Features
3rd cranial nerve palsy

Horner’s syndrome (sympathetic chain involvement) Myasthenia gravis Mitochondrial myopathy Pseudo-ptosis from contralateral upper motor neurone (UMN) lesion

There may even be a pseudo-ptosis produced by contralateral facial weakness, which results in a larger contralateral palpable fissure, making the contralateral eye appear larger than the eye with the ‘pseudo-ptosis’. This gives a false impression of ptosis in which the wrong eye is identified as being smaller, rather than the affected eye recognised as being larger (see Table 16.1).

This chapter will not deal with muscle weakness as a consequence of either UMN or LMN lesions, as these have been discussed elsewhere (see Chs 11 and 14). The focus of this chapter will be on pathology at either the neuromuscular junction or more peripherally within the muscle itself. It will be directed to that which is relevant to general practitioners, with the aim of improving clinical acumen and the enjoyment associated with the practice of medicine.

Neuromuscular Junction

a Myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis1 epitomises diseases of the neuromuscular junction, and is an autoimmune disease with antibodies directed against the acetylcholine receptors on skeletal muscles in approximately 90% of those with generalised myasthenia gravis and about half those with ocular myasthenia. Should these antibodies not be identified then the muscle-specific kinase antibodies (MuSK antibodies) are found in about half the remaining patients with myasthenia gravis. Those with MuSK antibodies tend to have a slightly atypical presentation of their myasthenic picture with more oculo-bulbar and neck extensor involvement and more respiratory symptoms.

Myasthenia may occur at any age, with male to female ratio of 1 : 3 with an earlier onset in women and girls (10–40 years) as compared to men (often 50–70 years). After the age of 40 years, the male : female ratio is approximately equal. There is a neonatal form of myasthenia, thought to be secondary to placental transmission of the acetylcholine receptor antibodies. This presents with impaired sucking, weak cry and ‘floppy’ limbs. This presents within the first two days of life. It generally only requires supportive treatment for the lifespan of the antibodies. There is also an autosomal recessive congenital form with infantile onset, and a drug-induced form consequent to the use of D-penicillamine.

The usual presentation of myasthenia gravis is with ptosis (see Table 16.1) together with fatiguable muscle weakness, diplopia and possible dysarthria, dysphagia, dyspnoea or fatiguable proximal limb weakness. Almost any skeletal muscle may be involved, as may be respiratory muscles, and myasthenia gravis may mimic other diseases. Purely ocular myasthenia often presents with ptosis and diplopia without other muscle group involvement.

When examining the patient with suspected myasthenia gravis, fatiguability is demonstrated by asking the patient to look up at a fixed object or spot and to maintain the upward gaze (see Fig 16.1).

Alternative methods for testing for fatiguability include asking the patient to count aloud to 100, and listening to the quality of articulation to recognise the development of a dysarthric and nasal quality to enunciation as the counting proceeds. Testing muscles of mastication, the patient is asked to bite down on a wooden tongue depressor while at the same time the doctor pulls on the spatula and observes the decline in the strength of the bite. Peripheral muscle fatiguability may be tested by asking the patient to repeatedly perform a muscle task with intervening relaxation, and recording the evolving weakness over time (see Fig 16.2).

What presents as purely ocular myasthenia may often progress to become generalised myasthenia, possibly consequent to an intercurrent infection. As with all neurology, the diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion with the differential diagnosis including: brainstem lesions and other causes of ptosis (see Table 16.1); multiple sclerosis; Graves’ disease (thyrotoxicosis) with ophthalmo-paresis; and other inflammatory myopathies, most of which causes elevation of creatine kinase (CK).

While diagnosis usually relies on specialist involvement, the suspicious general practitioner can start the ball rolling, having ordered acetylcholine receptor antibodies and a chest CT scan, looking for thymoma. Repetitive nerve stimulation or single fibre electromyography are clearly the domain of a neurophysiologist. Double-blind edrophonium (Tensilon) testing is best performed within the hospital setting with cardiac monitor and facility for resuscitation, which is rarely required. The general practitioner may perform an ‘ice test’ in which the application of ice produces strengthening of muscles. This is rarely, if ever, used these days as a referral to the consultant has supplanted such simple testing with Tensilon test. The ‘ice’ test really was only used in ocular myaesthenia.

Patients with myasthenia gravis may have concomitant other organ specific autoimmune diseases with up to 10% having associated thyroid disease, be it hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, that may be identified by the astute general practitioner who will treat this in their usual fashion, with possible referral.

Thymectomy is advocated in young patients with myasthenia (below the age of 50 years) and all those with thymoma. It is not usually advocated in those older than 65 years, those with pure ocular myasthenia or with MuSK antibodies.2

Pharmacological treatment of myasthenia is with pyridostigmine (Mestinon®) and/or the use of immunosuppression, be it with steroids or more aggressive, but this is usually the domain of the specialist.

Mestinon® is started at 60 mg b.d. or t.d.s. in mild cases, often complemented with slow release ‘Time Span’ (180 mg) at night. Adverse events may include excess salivation, abdominal cramping and possible diarrhoea; the latter may require anticholinergics. It should be remembered that Mestinon® may exacerbate glaucoma. A cholinergic crisis must be considered in patients with respiratory failure. These patients may also experience dilated pupils, together with the above adverse symptoms plus fasciculations. When this occurs the anticholinesterases should be withdrawn and the patient maintained in an intensive care environment with possible intubation. This represents a medical emergency, which may be provoked following the initiation of Mestinon® therapy.

Steroids, at a dosage of 1.0–1.5 mg/kg/day (usually 60–100 mg per day), may exacerbate weakness in the first one to two weeks so caution must be exercised when starting steroids, particularly in outpatients. Additional treatment with myclophenalate, azathioprine or possibly even cyclosporins has been used as steroid-sparing agents. In more severe cases plasmapheresis or IV immunoglobulin may be required, but this again is the domain of the consultant rather than the general practitioner.

Myopathies

As the name implies, ‘myo’ meaning muscle and ‘pathy’ meaning pathology, the focus is now on the end organ, namely the muscles themselves.5 Consideration of muscle diseases may adopt the traditional approach to classification, examining congenital and acquired causes (see Table 16.2).

TABLE 16.2 Classification of muscle diseases

Congenital Acquired

This produces a long list of disorders, many of which are quite rare and either will not be encountered or will rarely be encountered by general practitioners. Even if encountered by general practitioners, many of the rarer myopathies will be incorrectly diagnosed or overlooked. In many instances the same may be said for the general neurologist who does not practise within the super-sub-specialised area of muscle diseases.

It follows that a very detailed discussion of all these rare myopathies is unwarranted within an overview specifically for general practitioners. This should not be interpreted as being either patronising or derisive of general practitioners, but rather representing a realistic appreciation of the very great demands placed on the average general practitioner. The same might equally apply for the busy general neurologist, who will likewise rely heavily on the input of some specialised colleagues. It is thus incumbent to offer an overview to the approach, acknowledging that the list provided (see Table 16.2) is far from exhaustive.

The fundamental symptoms and signs of myopathy are muscle weakness, both reported by patients and observed when testing power, with/without pain (myalgia). Proximal muscle weakness is more common than is distal weakness, and acute myopathies are usually associated with inflammatory, systemic diseases or toxic aetiology. Slower onset myopathies include the muscular dystrophies and congenital myopathies, mitochondrial myopathies (also congenital although transmitted down the maternal line), metabolic myopathies and muscle membrane channel defects (as evidenced within periodic paralyses and myotonias) (see Table 16.2).

General practitioners faced with these presentations will have ordered CK levels, which should be elevated, and may also have ordered other simple laboratory tests such as: full blood count; biochemical screen, including calcium, phosphate and electrolyte levels plus renal function; magnesium levels; thyroid function; and other tests of systemic disease such as antinuclear antibody, extractable nuclear antibody, C-reactive protein and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Once the diagnostic algorithm has proceeded to electromyography (EMG), specialist involvement will have been organised.

The general practitioner may be aware of a positive family history, especially with the congenital diseases, although often other affected family members may have very subtle disease that could have avoided detection. Some diseases may have specific patterns of presentation, such as prominent finger (especially flexor) and quadriceps weakness, which is associated with inclusion body myositis, or the facioscapulohumeral distribution associated with the dystrophy of the same name.

What follows will be a brief discussion of some of the entities in Table 16.2. There will be no attempt to be exhaustive as early involvement of a consultant neurologist is almost universal. The general practitioner provides supportive measures, social interaction and day-to-day symptomatic relief, especially for longstanding disease. The astute general practitioner may offer the initial diagnostic insight, but works in partnership with the consultant. Muscle biopsy requires an even larger therapeutic team in which the physician will suggest which muscle is to be biopsied, the surgeon—usually a neurosurgeon—will conduct the procedure, and the pathologist, armed with adequate history and clinical features, may provide the diagnostic confirmation of the relevant disease process.

Congenital Myopathies

a Muscular dystrophies

These are hereditary diseases6 of which Duchenne and Becker muscular atrophies are most common. Below is a brief overview of some of the congenital myopathies (see Table 16.2).

b Mitochondrial myopathies

Mitochondrial myopathies7 are inherited via the maternal line and encompass a variety of conditions, including: Kearns-Sayer syndrome (KSS); familial progressive external ophthalmoplegia (PEO); myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibres (MERRF); and encephalopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) with overlap between the various mitochondrial syndromes. Diagnosis and treatment of the mitochondrial myopathies is usually outside the scope of general practice. They have been touched on here purely to whet the appetite, to encourage enthusiastic general practitioners to read further about a relatively new constellation of myopathies.

c Myotonias

Myotonic dystrophy8 is the most common muscular dystrophy with autosomal dominant, multi-system presentation. It results from a protein kinase gene defect occurring in approximately 1 in 8000 adults. In advanced cases it is often an ‘end-of-the-bed’ diagnosis as it causes obvious wasting of the temporalis muscles, which produces a typical facial appearance (see Fig 16.3).

The disease has anticipation, meaning it presents earlier in subsequent generations. Unlike most myopathies, weakness starts more distally and patients may present following unusual accidents, such as a road traffic accident occurring at night due to a loss of night vision with blindness caused by myotonic constriction of the pupils provoked by oncoming headlights. Another classical presentation may be as a motorbike accident because of an inability to release the accelerator hand grip of a motorbike due to grip myotonia.

Features of myotonic dystrophy may include: wasting of the face and neck muscles (particularly temporalis and sternocleidomastoid muscles) (see Fig 16.3); pharyngeal weakness with dysphagia; possible aspiration; conduction cardiac problems (possibly requiring pacemaker); psychological complaints (possibly with impaired intellect, apathy or paranoia); ophthalmic problems with specific cataract formation (in addition to senile cataracts); possible retinal or macular pigmentary degeneration; immunosuppression with low IgG; and hypogonadism (especially in males).

Physical examination may reveal the typical facies (see Fig 16.3) and grip myotonia may be evident when testing hand power—the patient having a problem releasing the tight grip. Often patients with myotonic dystrophy have learnt just how tightly to squeeze before the myotonia is provoked, and may have learned to conceal it. It behoves the clinician to encourage the patient to grip more tightly than the patient initially wants to do, and this may provoke the grip myotonia.

There is also percussion myotonia, elicited by tapping the relaxed thenar eminence with a tendon hammer. The thenar muscles contract with the thumb being kept pointing upwards with a delayed relaxation. Tongue myotonia may be provoked by tapping the protruding tongue with a tendon hammer, but personal preference is to avoid this as it should not really be necessary to make the diagnosis.

Up to a quarter of infants from affected women will have congenital myotonic dystrophy with mental retardation, respiratory distress, and poor sucking and dysphagia. It is important to warn expectant mothers with myotonic dystrophy of this possibility.

Use of anti-epileptic medications, such as phenytoin (Dilantin®) or carbamazepine (Tegretol®) may provide some symptomatic relief against the myotonia.

Acquired Myopathies

a Inflammatory myopathies

While uncommon (occurring in about 1 in 100 000), inflammatory myopathies9 have the potential for reversibility so their recognition is imperative. The most common inflammatory myopathies are polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis. They present with weakness, usually painless, and high CK levels. An exception to this is polymyalgia rheumatica in which there is pain, but CK is usually normal or only slightly elevated while ESR is high.

d Myopathies associated with drugs and toxins

Alcohol is the agent most recognised as being associated with myopathy for a number of reasons. Alcohol-induced obtundation, resulting in the patient lying in a single position for a long period of time with weight on certain muscles, may of itself produce rhabdomyolysis. Alcohol may possibly be a myotoxic agent or may indirectly cause problems with malnutrition, hypokalemia or hypophosphatemia.

In addition to alcohol there is a long list of medications that may cause myopathy. These include:

The above list is far from exhaustive, but has been provided to demonstrate that many of the agents encountered by general practitioners may cause myopathies. The general practitioner may be the first to recognise the association between the drug and the patient’s symptoms, and thus be ideally placed to protect the patient.

Conclusion

Muscle weakness may reflect lesions occurring anywhere along the neuromuscular axis, from the CNS, the peripheral nervous system, the neuromuscular junction or the muscle itself. This chapter has focused specifically on the neuromuscular junction, with myasthenia gravis being the principal condition, and on muscles as end organs of the motor pathway.

Most of the conditions reviewed in this chapter dictate the early involvement of a neurologist, but this need not lead to the exclusion of the general practitioner. Many of the conditions discussed have an insidious onset, thus the general practitioner may not be attuned to note the gradual changes experienced by the patient. It follows that the general practitioner must keep an ongoing vigil, looking for patterns of disease, or be an attentive listener and acutely aware of what the patient is describing.

Even in neurology, the study of muscle diseases, for which only the surface has been scratched here, is a relatively new super subspecialty area. The purpose of this chapter has been to identify patterns for recognition, some superficial approaches to diagnosis and treatment, and to offer a familiarisation program to further empower the general practitioner.

Without doubt, the general practitioner will be the first port of call for the patient with muscle diseases. Once properly empowered, the joy of making the correct diagnosis of what amounts to a relatively rare medical condition cannot be overemphasised. As with the whole ethos of this book, it is hoped that such knowledge will enhance the pleasure of practising medicine. If it achieves that goal then it has benefited both the general practitioners and their patients.

References