Multiple sclerosis

Published on 02/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1248 times

60 Multiple sclerosis

Patient 2

Advanced-level questions

Do you know of any criteria for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis?

The revised McDonald’s criteria are based on the clinical attacks and lesions initially, attempting to establish dissemination in time (have occurred at least 30 days apart) and place (affecting separate sites within the CNS) for lesions (Ann Neurol 2005;58:840–6, Lancet 2008; 372:1502–17). If the clinical features do not fit the criteria exactly, MRI can substitute for one of these clinical episodes (Fig. 60.1): MR lesions are defined as occurring with:

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis can be diagnosed after 1 year of a progressive deficit and two of:

Possible multiple sclerosis: patients having an appropriate clinical presentation but who do not meet all of the diagnostic criteria can be classified as having possible multiple sclerosis.

Is there any treatment for multiple sclerosis?

Immunomodulatory agents/approaches

Two forms of interferon-β (i.e. interferon beta-1b (Betaferon) and interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif)) have been shown to reduce the relapse rate in relapsing–remitting (non-progressive) neurological deficit by one-third (Neurology 1993;43:655–67, Lancet 1998;352;1491–7). Whether reduction in relapse rate reduces or prevents later disability is not known; some evidence has been presented in favour. The Association of British Neurologists recommends interferon-β be prescribed for ambulant patients with at least two definite relapses in the previous 2 years followed by recovery (may or may not be complete).

Interferon beta-1b has been reported to delay progression (for 9–12 months in a study period of 2–3 years) in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis of moderate severity (minimum walking distance of 20 m with assistance) and has been licensed for this indication. However, the SPECTRIMS study, which was a large trial, showed no significant benefit of interferon-1b therapy in delaying disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Intravenous methylprednisolone may hasten recovery from acute relapses but has no effect in the long term. A recent trial suggested intravenous methylprednisolone is no better than equivalent oral doses of methylprednisolone for acute relapses (Lancet 1997;349:902–6).

Copolymer-1 (Neurology 1995;45:1268–76), glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) and pulsed intravenous immunoglobulin (Lancet 1997;349:589–93) like interferon-β, reduce the relapse rate. However, the role of immunomodulatory agents needs to be defined.

Plasma exchange enhances recovery of relapse-related neurologic deficits in patients with no response to high-dose corticosteroids.

Newer therapies: two oral agents, cladribine and fingolimod, have been used in the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Both reduce the number of potentially autoaggressive lymphocytes that are available to enter the central nervous system (CNS). Cladribine (in the CLARITY trial) and fingolimod (in the FREEDOMS trial) were highly effective against placebo over a 2-year period, and fingolimod was more effective than intramuscular interferon beta-1a over a 12-month period (in the TRANSFORMS trial).

Alemtuzumab was more effective than interferon beta-1a in early, relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis but was associated with autoimmunity, most seriously manifesting as immune thrombocytopenic purpura (N Engl J Med 2008;359:1786–1801).

A single course of rituximab (by depleting B cells) reduces inflammatory brain lesions and clinical relapses for 48 weeks (N Engl J Med 2008;358:676–88).