Mass casualty, chemical, biological and radiological hazard contingencies

Published on 14/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Emergency Medicine

Last modified 14/03/2015

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1556 times

Chapter 22 Mass casualty, chemical, biological and radiological hazard contingencies

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Incidents involving mass casualties are infrequent. However, they have the potential to overwhelm usual health resources with very little notice. It is therefore important that contingencies are developed, tested and ready for immediate implementation. Such contingencies outline the responsibilities for overall medical control, coordination and effective casualty management in major emergencies and disaster situations. They include the procedures for triage, first aid and resuscitation, some of which require modification when resource availability needs to be rationed.

Response plans must provide a framework for coordination of transporting injured or incident-affected individuals to appropriate treatment sites. Plans must incorporate procedures to enable the presence of medical, nursing and first aid personnel, as well as other welfare personnel and psychological carers, to provide care at the scene of a mass casualty incident.

At a hospital level, plans need to be developed, implemented, rehearsed and evaluated. This enables hospitals that are often full to manage a large number of patients in excess of usual workloads or capacities and, in certain circumstances, victims with special or specific management needs.

Incorporation of public health resources and interventions is integral to provide guidance and procedures where hygiene, sanitation, communicable disease or biological hazards potentially exist. Contingencies must provide an interface for concurrent activation of recovery plans. Access to appropriate and timely psychological support for victims and care providers is included in both early and ongoing recovery phases. The overall objective is to mitigate disasters by participation in event planning and medical and emergency service activation and training.

PHASES OF A DISASTER

The phases of disaster management are prevention, preparedness, response and recovery.

ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGISLATIVE MANDATES

A national legislative framework for emergency management provides for counter disaster planning for response to and recovery from emergency situations that take place throughout Australia and provides a blue print for state or territory response plans. Separate state emergency recovery plan arrangements, designed to meet long-term assistance to people and communities, are activated during the response phase of an incident to provide early commitment of resources. Specific specialty plans for events such as shore retrieval, major burns management and terrorism have been developed in order to harness a coordinated and cooperative multi-city response.

Very broadly these legislative frameworks provide for:

Accordingly, under these arrangements, the police and the various state or territory emergency service organisations severally develop the non-medical component of the state disaster emergency management plans. Under the various state emergency response arrangements, the health departments have statutory responsibility to provide the necessary planning and response required to deal with matters associated with the general health of the community and to provide medical and hospital services required as a result of a major emergency or disaster.

MEDICAL RESPONSE PLANS AND AGENCIES

A medical response plan (or Medical DISPLAN) provides for a clinical care organisational framework that outlines the roles and responsibilities of the various participating medical and health responders, and provides the necessary integrated procedures for altering and mobilising medical and health personnel, for establishing on-site medical control and for definitive treatment of casualties. The concept is that all arrangements and procedures made within the medical response can be applied from the smallest to the largest incident with a build-up of medical coordination and medical and health resources as necessary, following the general pattern of normal daily operational procedures wherever possible. This extends to contingency planning and has a presence at major events where potential public threat is perceived to exist. Actions can be taken under local aegis in the absence of a declared disaster in order to provide protection from personal liability and to ensure compensation is available for injury to volunteers not covered under other insurance arrangements while training for or participating in emergency response activities.

State medical response plan representation, through medical and health participation in all local, regional and state DISPLAN committees, is mandatory to ensure integrated effective response can be provided in times of emergency.

Components of a state medical response

Pre-hospital medical coordination/disaster scene

Although titles, role delineations, responsibilities, definitions and plans vary amongst the states, the following principles are generic. The descriptions below outline the events and actions that are required for proficient on-site disaster medicine management.

Site medical control

The disaster site medical procedures in place for establishing early medical control for the proper triage, treatment and transportation of casualties are initially provided by officers of the first responding ambulance vehicle. These officers carry out the roles of casualty collecting officer (for assessment of numbers and types of casualties, to carry out a reconnaissance of the area and select an area suitable to set up a casualty collecting post, to report findings to ambulance control and to commence triage of casualties) and transport control officer (to establish suitable access and turn-around for ambulance vehicles and to report this information to ambulance communications centre for further incoming response vehicles).

As an AMC or ambulance commander arrives on site, further assessments will be made and a joint medical command post established. All incoming medical responders report to the command post where tasks within the CCP are allocated. Further medical assistance required on site is requested through the central medical coordinator to avoid convergence and duplication of resources. A typical communication structure is outlined in Figure 22.1.

The medical services provided on site will be limited initially, using the principle of doing as little as possible, as simply as possible, as quickly as possible and to as many as possible.

Life-saving procedures, such as airway management, immediate decompression of tension pneumothorax, arrest of haemorrhage, fracture stabilisation and relief of pain where necessary, may be the limit of medical assistance where medical resources are few. Thus effective triage or classification of casualties by a casualty collecting (ambulance) officer (CCO), medical officer or team leader from a medical team is essential.

Triage and reverse triage

Triage generally implies direction of clinical resources to the most seriously ill or injured by a trieur or triage officer. In a mass casualty situation, demand may be in excess of resources availability. It is neither ethical nor practical to classify clearly non-salvageable victims as top priorities. Given this, two methods of field or mass casualty triage are employed, depending upon the number of casualties and the availability of clinical resources. The two methods of triage—SIEVE and SORT—are utilised at different phases of casualty management at disaster sites.

Sieve

This triage method is used during the initial phase of managing mass casualties. It focuses on determining which patients will survive and channels resources to initially moving that cohort of patients from the scene to a casualty clearing post or station. Triaging in this manner is a repeated process to ensure refinement of urgency stratification and to respond appropriately to the ongoing evolution of a casualty’s injury complex and consequent physiology.

Casualty assessment is based upon the findings of a primary survey. If casualties are ambulant, they are initially regarded as walking wounded and are directed or escorted to a casualty clearing post. If not ambulant, a triaging primary survey is performed. This looks at the airway, respiratory rate and capillary refill. Treatment is limited to the institution of simple life-saving primary survey manoeuvres. These are:

Casualties must be re-triaged on the basis of response, injury pattern and likely prognosis. If critically injured or ill patients are unresponsive to these measures and unlikely to survive, they become second priority casualties. This is sometimes known as reverse triage

A standard clinical reasoning scheme for triage is outlined in Figure 22.3. SIEVE triage categories are as follows:

Table 22.1 Triage groupings and criteria for mass casualty situations

Group Priority Criteria
1 Red—priority 1

2 Yellow—priority 2

3 Green—minor injuries

4 Black—deceased

SORT

This triage method is the more formal risk stratification or triage system that identifies the urgency with which most emergency health workers are familiar. SORT identifies time-critical patients and assists in scheduling optimal allocation of available resources. If used in the initial triage, this mode of triage is applicable for incidents involving only a small number of casualties. It is more commonly used on admission to casualty collecting posts or field hospitals.

This method of triage is based on the Revised Trauma Score and is consistent with the Australasian Triage Scale, triage practices taught in emergency management of severe trauma (EMST), emergency life support (ELS), advanced paediatric life support (APLS) and major incident medical management and support (MIMMS) courses. It is identical to the practices employed by ambulance, first responder and other emergency medical services personnel for determining the time-critical patient. It is a repeated process that is dependent upon traditional ongoing patient observation.

SORT is generally implemented in the field utilising the Revised Trauma Score in order to rank physiological embarrassment and allocating an ordinal score. This assists with re-prioritisation or risk stratification of casualties. Scores of 1–10 are associated with the immediate category. A score of 11 identifies an urgent patient. A score of 12 or higher identifies casualties that can wait for delayed management (Figure 22.4).

Further refinement of triage can be assisted by attention to pattern of injuries or mechanism of injuries. However, in a trauma related mass casualty incident, a considerable number of patients may be classified as time-critical on mechanism of injury alone (Table 22.2

Buy Membership for Emergency Medicine Category to continue reading. Learn more here