Managing the Open Abdomen

Published on 09/04/2015 by admin

Filed under Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1729 times

Chapter 16 Managing the Open Abdomen

1 Clinical Anatomy

Management of the open abdomen does not depend so much on recognition of the anatomy of the abdominal wall but on the maintenance of the anterior peritoneal space (Fig. 16-1). If this space is maintained, there is the potential to continue to work toward closure of the abdominal wall. If this space is lost, then the surgeon must move on to protecting the viscera from the external environment and trying to obtain skin closure over the bowel.

2 Preoperative Considerations

2 Pharmacologic Management

Whether or not a patient who has an open abdomen needs to remain paralyzed and intubated has been questioned. Obviously, if the patient is critically ill or if there are other reasons why intubation and paralysis are necessary, these will take precedence over the open abdomen. If, however, the patient does not have acute physiologic derangements, then weaning of paralysis and just maintaining the patient on sedation is reasonable. Whereas some would extubate these patients, in this author’s experience, extubation is not warranted for patients who are going back to surgery frequently and who also usually have other medical issues that are being addressed.

The other pharmacologic question is that of antibiotic use. There have been no randomized controlled trials and very few case-control series using antibiotics with an open abdomen if there is no gross contamination or infection. Thus, antibiotics in clean and clean-contaminated cases cannot be justified beyond 24 hours. If the wound is contaminated or infected, then prophylactic/therapeutic antibiotics should be administered. The length of time depends on the severity of contamination or infection and the patient’s other comorbidities. One final issue is the abdomen that has laparotomy pads in place to control bleeding. These patients should be placed on prophylactic antibiotics because of an increased incidence of intraabdominal abscess.

Nutrition also can be considered a pharmacologic intervention. There is no contraindication to enteral nutrition just because the abdomen is open. Although there may be other reasons not to institute enteral feedings, the presence of an open abdomen is not one of them.

3 Operative Steps

2 Technique

The focus of the technique is to maintain the anterior abdominal domain, and, if a fistula is present, to control effluent while still providing for visceral protection.

All visceral surgery should be completed, if possible. Once this is done, a temporary coverage for the intestine is fashioned. This can be a plastic drape, iodine-impregnated drape (Figs. 16-4 to 16-9), or a commercially available visceral drape (Figs. 16-10 to 16-13). The key point is to get the drape under the abdominal wall and passed all the way laterally to the paracolic gutters. The author believes that some sort of support of the visceral drape is needed to accomplish this. The Barker technique, in which an operative towel is sandwiched between two iodine-impregnated drapes, is favored. This provides enough support such that the covering will not shift once placed.

After the visceral coverage is in place, drains are placed over the cover in the abdominal wound. For a midline laparotomy, these drains are not placed in the gutters of the wound but instead looped in the superior and inferior recess of the wound. This is where most leakage occurs and thus is where the drains need to be.

A blue operative towel is placed over the drains and is then covered by another sheet of iodine-impregnated plastic. Before placing this final sheet of plastic, the drains are connected to wall suction and maintained on wall suction until just before transfer out of the operating room.

3 Fascial Closure

While none of these patients are candidates for complete fascial closure, most patients can have part of their abdominal wall reapproximated at each operation (Figs. 16-14 to 16-16). Every time a patient goes to the operating room, an attempt should be made to bring at least some of the fascia back together. This may be just one or two stitches, but in the end, it is progress, and progress is what is needed in these difficult patients.

4 Postoperative Care

5 Pitfalls/Pearls

The major pitfall in management of the open abdomen is giving up too quickly. While it is easier to just place some type of mesh coverage over the abdomen and wait to skin graft, the cost of this to the patient in terms of both lost productivity and dollars has been well documented. With the appropriate dressing in place, patients have been serially closed over the course of three weeks.

If dressings are not applied in such a way that the viscera are protected, then each dressing change can debride away some of the bowel serosa, and this will lead to a fistula. If a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system is being used over the viscera, then it either needs to be covered in plastic, or a nonadherent type sponge needs to be used.

A time will come when the patient is not getting any better, and the reason for this is the open abdomen. This patient has developed tertiary peritonitis, and the only way they are going to get better is to cover the viscera. In this patient, a biologic-type mesh is believed to be the most appropriate closure. It prevents adhesions (good for reoperation at a later date); protects the viscera during dressing changes (lower fistula rate); and in select patients, may function as their definitive closure.

If the fascia is very close to closing, one may be tempted to perform a component separation (CS) to allow for primary reapproximation of the fascia. This is to be discouraged because reherniation in this patient population is high, and if CS has been performed, a major secondary reconstruction option has been eliminated. It is better to bridge with a biologic mesh and save the more complex reconstruction options for a later date.

The exception to the aforementioned is the patient whose CS was planned and the abdominal wall was being staged. This includes abdominal wall infections and loss of domain type hernias. Here, CS can be performed as planned if it is thought the patient may benefit.