Managing the critical care environment

Published on 20/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Critical Care Medicine

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1209 times

CHAPTER 2 Managing the critical care environment

Bioterrorism

Bioterrorism is the intentional release of a biologic agent, generally aimed at causing as great a number of people as possible to suffer illness and death. A bioterrorism event should be suspected when there is an unusual and unexplained increase in an illness.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified six biological agents of highest concern for use in terrorism: anthrax, botulism, hemorrhagic fever viruses, plague, smallpox, and tularemia. Several factors explain why these agents are more likely to be used:

Bioterrorism assessment: surveillance

Anthrax

Collaborative management

Care priorities

6. Vaccination:

A vaccine to prevent anthrax exists, but it is not yet available to the general public. Anyone at risk for anthrax exposure, including certain members of the U.S. armed forces, laboratory workers, and workers who may enter or reenter contaminated areas, may be vaccinated. If anthrax is used as a weapon, a vaccination program will be initiated to vaccinate as many exposed people as possible.

CARE PLANS: ANTHRAX

Gas exchange, impaired

related to respiratory insufficiency from respiratory infection secondary to inhalation of anthrax.

Goals/outcomes:

Within 12 to 24 hours of treatment, patient has adequate gas exchange as evidenced by PaO2 at least 80 mm Hg, PaCO2 35 to 45 mm Hg, pH 7.35 to 7.45, presence of normal breath sounds, and absence of adventitious breath sounds. The respiratory rate (RR) is 12 to 20 breaths/min with normal pattern and depth.

image Respiratory Status: Gas Exchange

Botulism

Collaborative management

Care priorities

4. Supportive care:

Includes mechanical ventilation, nutritional support, care for immobility, and treatment for secondary infections.

Hemorrhagic fever viruses

Plague

Smallpox (variola)

Assessment

Clinical case definition: An illness with acute onset of fever ≥101°F (38.3°C), followed by a rash characterized by firm, deep-seated vesicles or pustules in the same stage of development without other apparent cause. These characteristics help differentiate the smallpox from chickenpox. Smallpox may be easily missed in the early stage by health care providers.

Incubation period: Usually 12 to 14 days but can range from 7 to 17 days. During this time, the patient feels fine and is not contagious.

Prodromal period: Begins with a high fever (101° to 104°F), malaise, headache, and backache. The patient may exhibit severe abdominal pains, vomiting, and delirium. This period lasts for 2 to 4 days before a rash develops. The rash begins with small red spots on the tongue and mouth. During this phase, the person is most contagious.

Rash development: Progresses in the mouth and develops on the skin, starting on the face and moving to the arms and legs and then to the feet and hands. It usually spreads to all parts within 24 hours. When rash appears, the patient’s fever subsides and the patient starts to feel better. On day 3, the rash consists of raised bumps. On day 4, the bumps fill with thick, cloudy fluid with a possible indent in the center. Indentation is the classic sign of smallpox rash. The bumps become pustules and eventually scab over. During the pustule stage, the patient is again febrile. After 2 weeks, most of the sores have scabs, which begin to fall off, leaving marks that will become pitted scars on the skin.

Collaborative management

There are no approved treatments for smallpox. Currently, treatment consists of supportive care. However, cidofovir, an antiviral, is currently being studied to see if it is effective against the smallpox virus.

Care priorities

Tularemia

Emerging infections

Emerging infectious diseases are a serious problem. Medicine and technology have moved forward to successfully overcome and prevent many infections, yet new infections continue to emerge. The new infections are complex, and their evolution has been challenging for health care personnel to recognize, understand, and treat. Many emerging infections, such as H1N1, H5N1, hantavirus, and “mad cow” disease, originate from different species of animals and have spread to humans.

Infection protection and infection control

For several decades, infection prevention and control have focused on the use of barriers (e.g., gloves, masks, and gowns) to interrupt transmission of organisms between patients and health care providers. Barriers are a major component of the various systems of transmission precautions.

Many different systems of transmission precautions have been used in hospitals over the years and are commonly called isolation precautions. These recommendations are updated periodically, with the most recent revision (2007) by the CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) intended to reflect evidence-based practices and current knowledge. These techniques and procedures designed to interrupt the transmission of infection adhere to five basic principles:

The 2007 guideline contains two tiers of precautions:

Humans are vulnerable, without natural defenses against these infections. Researchers are hard-pressed to develop vaccines and cures. Regardless of sex, age, socioeconomic status, or ethnic background, infectious disease can strike at any time and may lead to significant morbidity and death.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a febrile lower respiratory infection that mimics many other respiratory illnesses. To date, there are no specific clinical or laboratory findings that distinguish with certainty SARS-associated coronavirus (CoV) disease from other respiratory illnesses rapidly enough to facilitate management decisions that must be made soon after the patient presents to the health care system. Therefore, early recognition of this disease still relies on a combination of clinical and epidemiologic features.

The virus may have originated from animals and spread to humans. SARS first emerged in the Guandong Province in China during November 2002 through June 2003, where approximately 15,000 probable cases were identified. A worldwide epidemic occurred when a SARS-infected physician contaminated several guests at a hotel in Hong Kong. The guests were the catalyst leading to large outbreaks of SARS in Hong Kong, Vietnam, Singapore, and Canada. Overall, 8000 probable SARS cases were identified during the outbreak, and 800 total deaths occurred from 29 different countries.

A novel CoV has been identified as the cause of SARS and is now labeled SARS-CoV. CoVs are enveloped RNA viruses that cause diseases in both humans and animals. In humans, this group of viruses is implicated in the causes of the common cold and pneumonia. The distinct microscopic appearance of a crown surrounding the viruses has led to its name. Research in China has detected several CoVs closely related to SARS-CoV in two animal species (masked palm civet cat and raccoon-dog). This provided the first link between human SARS-CoV and its presence in other animals. Both are considered delicacies in China and are consumed by humans. One theory states that this CoV mutated and was transmitted to humans through handling of these animals or contact with their saliva and feces.

Assessment

History and risk factors

Evaluation of sars-cov disease among persons presenting with community-acquired illness

CDC recommends the following approach for the evaluation of SARS-CoV disease among persons presenting with community-acquired illness. Along with clinical features, clinicians should routinely incorporate into the medical history questions that may provide epidemiologic clues to identify patients.

In the absence of person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV anywhere in the world, the diagnosis of SARS-CoV should only be considered in patients who require hospitalization for radiographically confirmed pneumonia and who have an epidemiologic history that raises suspicion of SARS-CoV disease. The suspicion of SARS-CoV disease is raised if, within 10 days of symptom onset, the patient:

Once person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV has been documented in the world, the diagnosis should still be considered in patients who require hospitalization for pneumonia and who have the epidemiologic history described above. In addition, all patients with fever or lower respiratory symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, difficulty breathing) should be questioned about whether within 10 days of symptom onset they have had:

Screening labwork

Laboratory studies such as bacterial cultures and respiratory viral panels can be used to rule out other potential causes of respiratory tract infection. SARS-CoV reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests are not typically ordered until after a high index of suspicion by the physician and notification of public health officials.

Diagnostic Tests for SARS
Test Purpose Abnormal Findings
Laboratory Studies
SARS-CoV reverse-transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test: A signed consent should be completed prior to collection of a sample. The sample should be forwarded to a state or local public health laboratory for processing. Detects SARS-CoV viral RNA in respiratory samples, stool, and blood. The likelihood of detecting infection is increased if multiple specimens are collected at several times during the course of the illness. Has not been licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Currently approved as an FDA investigational device exemption (test). A positive SARS-CoV RT-PCR test should be considered presumptive until confirmatory testing by a second reference laboratory is performed.
A negative test result for SARs-CoV may not rule out SARS-CoV disease and should not affect patient management or infection control decisions.
SARS-CoV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test: A signed consent should be completed before collection of the sample. The sample should be forwarded to a state or local public health laboratory for processing. Detects SARS-CoV antibodies in blood samples. CDC considers detection of SARS-CoV antibody to be the most reliable indicator of infection. Has not been licensed by the FDA. Has been allowed for use by the FDA as a result of the SARS outbreak. Detectable antibodies
SARS-CoV immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for antibody Gives results identical to SARS-CoV EIA for antibody Detectable antibodies
Specimen culture for SARS-CoV Isolation of SARS-CoV from a clinical specimen to confirm the virus SARS-CoV identified in specimen
Sputum and blood cultures Test can aid in ruling out bacterial infection. Positive for bacterial pathogen
Respiratory viral panels for influenza A and B, respiratory syncytial viruses, and specimens for Legionella and pneumococcal and urinary antigen These tests aid in ruling out other potential sources of infection. Positive for pathogen
CBC and clotting profile Monitoring WBC counts to assist in evaluation of other bacterial infection Evaluation for lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia
Radiology
Chest radiograph Assists in identifying the progression of disease and anatomic involvement Infiltrates suggestive of pneumonia
Respiratory Tests
Arterial blood gases (ABGs) Determination of patient oxygen saturation of arterial blood Alkalosis, acidosis
 (see Acid-Base Imbalances, p. 1)
Pulse oximetry Measure patient oxygen saturation of arterial blood Values of <90%

Collaborative management

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides guidance on the clinical evaluation and management of patients who present with fever and/or respiratory illness. These guidelines focus on identification of cases and infection control management. At the present time, treatment for SARS is primarily supportive.
Management Goal
Notify facility infection prevention leadership and the public health department. Communicate suspected community health threat to comply with public health regulation and facilitate collaboration on the control and diagnosis of SARS-CoV.
At initial suspicion, place a mask on the patient and arrange for isolation. Place patient in an (Airborne Infection Isolation Room. [AIIR]negative pressure room) and wear personal protective equipment (PPE), including gowns, gloves, N-95 respirators, and facial protection upon entry to the room. Removal of protective equipment in a manner that prevents contamination of skin and clothing is a priority. To prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV to other patients and to yourself.
Oxygen therapy To support gas exchange and circumvent development of hypoxemia. Maintain pulse oximetry of >90%.
Intubation and mechanical ventilation To support gas exchange and help maintain acid-base balance
Intravenous fluids To prevent dehydration and maintain adequate circulatory volume
Antibiotics To prevent secondary infections. Empirical antibiotic therapy should be prescribed for typical and atypical community-acquired pneumonia. Therapy may include a fluoroquinolone or macrolide.
Antiviral Ribavirin is the antiviral of choice, but has had mixed results. Adverse side effects include hemolytic anemia and electrolyte imbalances (i.e., hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia). Patients must be monitored closely for significant side effects.
Corticosteroids May be beneficial in patients with pulmonary infiltrates and hypoxemia. Methylprednisone dosage ranges from 40 mg twice daily to 2 mg/kg daily.

Care priorities for sars-cov

2. Infection control:

Patients are to be placed in a negative-pressure room under airborne, contact, and standard precautions. Anyone who enters the patient’s room must wear gowns, gloves, an N-95 respirator, and eye protection. Hand hygiene should be performed after contact with a patient on precautions. If there is a lack of negative-pressure rooms and/or there is a need to concentrate infection control efforts and resources, patients may be cohorted on a floor or nursing unit designated for the care of SARs patients only if air-handling systems can be modified to allow these areas to operate under negative pressure relative to surrounding areas.

Additional nursing diagnoses

See nursing diagnoses for Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (p. 365), Acute Pneumonia (p. 373), Acute Respiratory Failure (p. 383), Mechanical Ventilation (p. 99), Fluid and Electrolyte Disturbances (p. 37), and Emotional and Spiritual Support of the Patient and Significant Others (p. 200).

Creutzfeldt-jakob disease

Pathophysiology

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a rare, fatal, neurodegenerative disorder, believed to be caused by an abnormal isoform of a glycoprotein known as a prion, a proteinaceous infectious particle. The most common disorder is bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or “mad cow” disease. A new form of CJD has emerged, called new variant CJD (vCJD or nvCJD). This form of CJD is linked to consumption of cattle with mad cow disease. Clinical and epidemiologic evidence supporting this link between “mad cow” disease and vCJD has become stronger. As of May 2004, a total of 153 cases of vCJD had been reported. vCJD generally affects younger people with a mean age of 29 years, whereas CJD occurs in the age group between 65 and 69 years.

CJD is classified as a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, a category that includes other diseases (e.g., fatal familial insomnia, Gerstman-Sträussler-Scheinker syndromes). Prion disease occurs in animals, particularly cattle, sheep, and goats. CJD is endemic around the world and its estimated incidence report is 1 case per 1 million population. Three forms of “classic” CJD have been identified. Sporadic CJD affects older adults with rapid-onset dementia and neurologic symptoms of unknown cause. Familial CJD is an inherited disease and generally strikes younger individuals. It has a longer course in comparison to sporadic CJD. Iatrogenic CJD occurs through contact with infected tissue via medical procedures or treatments.

Prion proteins are normal proteins in the body and brain. In CJD, these proteins become abnormally shaped, as a result either of genetics or of contamination from an outside source. This leads to surrounding normal prion proteins taking on the abnormal shape. Central nervous system (CNS) function is disrupted, leading to cognitive impairment and cerebellar dysfunction. As the process continues, the abnormal prions accumulate in the brain, causing neuronal dysfunction, neuron death, gliosis (proliferation of neuroglial tissue in the CNS), and ultimately death.

Assessment: creutzfeldt-jakob disease

Risk factors and history

Diagnostic tests

CJD is diagnosed based on typical signs, symptoms, and progression of disease.

Diagnostic Tests for CID
Test Purpose Abnormal Findings
Radiology
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): T1-, T2-, and diffusion-weighted and FLAIR sequences should be ordered with MRI. Identify abnormalities of the brain consistent with CJD Images will show abnormalities (hyperintensities and cortical ribboning) in specific areas of the brain (e.g., basal ganglia and medial and pons).
Neurophysiology
Electroencephalogram (EEG) For sporadic CJD cases
Identify alteration in brain waves
Consistent slowing of brain waves and/or presence of periodic sharp wave complexes, generally late in the course of the disease
Laboratory Studies
Lumbar puncture: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination Assess for protein levels consistent with CJD Elevated CSF protein levels. A 14-3-3 CSF protein test should be highly sensitive and specific to CJD.
Brain biopsy Assess region of brain that appears abnormal on MRI. Only means of confirming CJD besides autopsy. Deposits or plaques of abnormal bundles of prion protein, spongiform encephalopathy

Additional nursing diagnoses

See nursing diagnoses and interventions in Nutritional Support (p. 117), Mechanical Ventilation (p. 99), Alterations in Consciousness (p. 24), Wound and Skin Care (p. 167), Prolonged Immobility (p. 149), Emotional and Spiritual Support for the Patient and Significant Others (p. 200), and Ethical Considerations in Critical Care (p. 215).

West nile virus

Assessment: west nile virus

Severe infection/wnv meningitis, wnv encephalitis, and wnv poliomyelitis

When the CNS is affected, clinical syndromes ranging from febrile headache to aseptic meningitis to encephalitis may occur, and these are usually indistinguishable from similar syndromes caused by other viruses.

WNV encephalitis or meningoencephalitis is characterized by altered mental status or focal neurologic findings.

WNV meningitis involves fever, headache, and nuchal rigidity (stiff neck). Pleocytosis (abnormal increase in WBC count in cerebrospinal fluid) is present. Changes in consciousness are not usually seen and are mild when present.

WNV encephalitis also involves fever and headache and more global symptoms. There is typically an alteration of consciousness, which may be mild and result in lethargy but may progress to confusion or coma. Focal neurologic deficits, including limb paralysis and cranial nerve palsies, may be observed. Tremor and movement disorders also have been identified.

WNV poliomyelitis is characterized by the acute onset of asymmetric limb weakness or paralysis in the absence of sensory loss. Pain sometimes precedes the paralysis. The paralysis can occur in the absence of fever, headache, or other common symptoms associated with WNV infections. Involvement of the respiratory muscles, leading to acute respiratory failure, can occur.

Clinical features

Myocarditis, pancreatitis, and fulminant hepatitis have been noted in outbreaks before 1990.

Labwork

Certain findings are seen in patients with severe disease.

Diagnostic Tests for West Nile Virus
Test Purpose Abnormal Findings
Laboratory Studies
WNV IgM antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC ELISA) of serum or CSF To diagnose WNV
Most efficient diagnostic test. Best to collect 8 to 21 days after the onset of symptoms.
Positive MAC ELISA
Patients who have been vaccinated or infected with other flaviviruses (e.g., Japanese encephalitis) may have positive results.
Complete blood count (CBC) Identify abnormalities associated with WNV Elevated leukocyte counts with lymphocytopenia and anemia. CBC can be normal with WNV.
Serum chemistry To assess for hyponatremia which can be seen in WNV Hyponatremia
Radiology
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Identify possible abnormalities associated with WNV One-third of patients show enhancements of the leptomeninges and the periventricular areas.

Testing for WNV can be obtained through local or state health departments. WNV is on the list of designated nationally notifiable arboviral encephalitides, and the proper authorities should be informed. Check your local or state health department for guidance.

Additional nursing diagnoses

See nursing diagnoses and interventions in Nutritional Support (p. 117), Mechanical Ventilation (p. 99), Alterations in Consciousness (p. 24), Wound and Skin Care (p. 167), Prolonged Immobility (p. 149), Emotional and Spiritual Support for the Patient and Significant Others (p. 200), and Ethical Considerations in Critical Care (p. 215).

Pandemic flu

An epidemic occurs when there are an unusually high number of people affected by a disease. A pandemic is an international epidemic. An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus is detected and the human population has no immunity. With the increase in global travel and transportation, and urban development with areas of overcrowding, epidemics that result from a new influenza virus are likely to be disseminated around the world and rapidly become a pandemic. The WHO has defined the phases of a pandemic to create a global framework to aid countries in pandemic preparedness and response planning. Pandemics can be either mild or severe in the illness and death they cause. The severity of a pandemic can change during the time the illness continues to spread.

WHO has developed a global influenza preparedness plan that outlines the responsibilities of WHO and national authorities in the event of an influenza pandemic. WHO also offers guidance tools and training to assist in the development of national pandemic preparedness plans (http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/A58_13-en.pdf).

Two strains of flu—seasonal flu and the H1N1 (swine) flu—were circulating in North America during 2009. A third, highly lethal H5N1 (Avian) flu is circulating outside the United States. Healthy people generally recover from the flu without difficulty, but there is a subset of people at higher risk for serious complications. Efforts are under way to monitor the spread of all flu viruses.

Avian influenza (“bird flu”)

Diagnostic tests

Diagnostic Tests For Avian Influenza
Test Purpose Abnormal Findings
Laboratory Studies
CBC Assess for changes suggestive of other bacterial infections Elevated white blood cell count
Influenza A/H5 (Asian lineage) virus real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay:
Must consult with and have authorization from local or state health departments. Test is conducted only in designated labs.
To identify causative agent Positive
Rapid bedside tests:
Available but results are not confirmatory
Conduct for rapid screening for virus Positive
Confirmatory tests should be performed.
Viral culture:
Must be conducted in biosafety Level 3 laboratory
Identify causative agent Positive for pathogen
Radiology
Chest radiograph Identify progression of lung disease, and anatomic involvement Infiltrates, atalectasis
Respiratory Tests
ABG (if patient is in respiratory distress) Determination of oxygen saturation and blood gases Acidosis, alkalosis
Pulse oximetry Measure oxygen saturation < 90%

Collaborative management

At present, the primary medication therapy option is oseltamivir (Tamiflu). An alternative is zanmivir (Relenza); however, there is concern that viruses may become resistant to both of these drugs. Treatment is supportive according to the clinical status of the patient.

Care priorities

Additional nursing diagnoses

See nursing diagnoses for Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (p. 365), Acute Pneumonia (Chapter 4), Acute Respiratory Failure (p. 383), Mechanical Ventilation (p. 99), and Emotional and Spiritual Support of the Patient and Significant Others (p. 200).

The 2009 h1n1 influenza (“swine” flu)

The 2009 H1N1 (“swine flu”) is a new influenza virus causing illness in humans that was first detected in the United States in April 2009. This virus continues to spread between and among humans internationally, in a similar fashion to the spread of seasonal influenza viruses. On June 11, 2009, the WHO raised the influenza alert level to Phase 6, the highest level, indicating a global pandemic of 2009 H1N1 flu was under way.

Collaborative management

At present, the primary medication therapy option is oseltamivir (Tamiflu). Another alternative is zanmivir (Relenza); however, there is concern that viruses may become resistant to both of these drugs. Treatment is supportive according to the clinical status of the patient.

Care priorities

For information on how to provide care for hospitalized patients, see Avian flu care priorities, p. 197.

Emotional and spiritual support of the patient and significant others

Nurses must be acutely aware of the need to assess objectively and carefully, to avoid imposing personal views on others. Caregivers may feel they are in the best position to assign significance to an event or to decide the most appropriate response to an event. When faced with challenging situations, in order to facilitate therapeutic interactions, the nurse must assess both the patient’s and significant others’ understanding and perception of the situation prior to implementing a plan of care. Assessment requires active listening, being fully present in the interaction, and investing quality time by an interdisciplinary team to assist with problem solving. Given the resource intensity and possible inconsistency of caregiver assignments or coverage by other disciplines, time constraints may prompt dysfunctional situations not to be handled in the best manner to produce a sustainable solution or, in the worst case scenario, not to be noticed at all.

imageIt is of paramount importance that nurses are familiar with how to provide both emotional and spiritual support to patients and families, to help guide them through the challenges posed by critical illness and hospitalization. Complex support system issues may include identification of high-risk dependent relationships between older adults, family members, domestic partners, children, or religious leaders. Actions required may include steps to prevent further infliction of physical, emotional, or sexual harm, including neglect of the basic necessities of life or exploitation.

Communication must be valued by all caregivers. Time must be invested to develop skills, enhance cognition, and learn to control emotions. Effective exchange of information is foundational for collaboration between the health care team and the patient. Accurate and timely information should be shared throughout the hospitalization to ensure the delivery of holistic patient care. Successful communication results from the development and implementation of strong relationships. In today’s fast-paced, dynamic health care environment, relationships among health care professionals vary and change over time. With less opportunity to establish relationships, trusting the clinical knowledge, decisions, and judgment of unknown colleagues may be difficult. In large metropolitan teaching hospitals, the problem is compounded as the monthly rotation of multiple levels of physician house staff ensues.

Nursing care is often delivered in various time frames on a dynamic schedule and includes increasing numbers of contract and per diem clinical staff. Stabilizing the team and taking the time needed to provide effective communication can be challenging. The larger the number of either health care team members involved or family/significant others involved, the greater is the challenge. Emotionally charged events are common in the critical care environment, and to provide care of the whole patient and family system, emotional support is necessary to assist with coping. Occasionally, the caregivers are also in need of emotional support to cope with difficult situations.

Emotional support is defined as support for emotions the patient feels that will help provide the best outcomes for that patient. Key elements of holistic care include providing encouragement, reassurance, and acceptance during the times of stress. Mental, emotional, and spiritual interventions are needed to help with coping and decision making during critical illness. Emotional responses may be closely associated with mental processes. Thoughts or perceptions drive feelings about life events. Knowledge affects perception, so keeping patients and families informed and up-to-date is of paramount importance to their emotional well-being, as knowledge will promote them having more perceived control of the situation. Frequent, repetitive, simple explanations are often needed, because during emotional upset, ability to remember the information given is often impaired.

Nurses provide assistance to patients to facilitate adaptation to perceived stressors, changes, or threats that interfere with meeting the demands present in their lives, including the role they play when interacting with others. Coping techniques that are used vary with individuals, including the care providers, and are affected by culture. Counseling or family-centered care team conferences may be provided, using an interactive, helping approach, to focus on the needs, problems, or feelings of the patient, significant others, and health care team members. Actions are designed to enhance or support coping, crisis management, problem solving, and interpersonal relationships.

imageEmotionally charged ethical issues, particularly end-of-life decision making, frequently arise in the critical care environment, prompting care providers to address do-not-resuscitate issues, withdrawal of care, and whether the family desires to be present if resuscitation is needed. Despite countless benefits having been noted, sociology studies have concluded family presence during resuscitation will not be an acceptable practice until all care providers shift to a more holistic perspective. Involvement of the interdisciplinary team, including pastoral care, mental health professionals including the psychologist and/or social worker, palliative medicine or palliative care, and the ethicist, may be warranted on admission to the critical care unit, and throughout the stay if complex end-of-life issues arise.

2-1 RESEARCH BRIEF

A large percentage of the U.S. general public has stated they would like to remain with a loved one during resuscitation. Despite the countless benefits reported, family presence during resuscitation is a controversial, highly debated issue among health professionals in adult critical care units. The authors designed an exploratory, descriptive, and correlational study to determine the relationship between spirituality of health care professionals and support for family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation. A holistic Spirituality Assessment Scale (SAS) developed by Howden was used to glean information regarding a more comprehensive meaning of spirituality—not focused exclusively on religious beliefs and feelings of patients, but rather, inclusive of feelings of health care providers. Data were collected from 73 nurses, 31 physicians, and 4 physician assistants. Results suggested a link between a holistic perspective and support for family presence. The higher the scores of spirituality for health care providers, the greater was the likelihood that they supported family presence as patient’s right and part of holistic care. The study helps to fill the gap in current literature regarding certain demographic characteristics affecting whether health care providers are willing to allow families to be present during invasive procedures and resuscitation. Further analysis of extraneous variables is needed before the results of this study can be generalized.

From Baumhover N, Hughes L: Spirituality and support for family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitations in adults. Am J Crit Care 18(4):357–367, 2009.

Promoting psychological peace in the final phase of life is of paramount importance to the patient and involves exploration of the spiritual beliefs of all those involved in decisions. Disagreement on the appropriate course of action among health care team members stems from many factors, including their spirituality. Confusion among significant others regarding the wishes of the patient, their own views on death and dying, or vacillating patient views may create a dysfunctional care environment. The problem is compounded when various subgroups of decision makers share perspectives in isolation, rather than discussing them openly in a group composed of all key decision makers.

In extreme cases, anger and confusion may result in violent behavior, and the lines of communication may deteriorate if appropriate avenues are not initiated to repair damages. The American College of Critical Care Medicine has developed patient and family guidelines that help widen perspectives, open new options, and suggest different ideas for health care providers to help abate situations escalating to the point of physical violence.

Spiritual support is a part of providing holistic care. Several authors describe spirituality as a variable of holism. Spirituality is not to be confused with religion. Although the vast majority of nurses believe spiritual care is a part of providing patient-centered, holistic care, over half feel inadequate to perform spiritual care interventions. Spirituality has been described as values, beliefs, and behaviors of an individual related to purpose and meaning in life; connectedness to self, others, and life and universal dimensions; and innerness or inner resources and capacity for transcendence. Using these characteristics, Howden developed the Spirituality Assessment Scale (SAS) (Box 2-1). The 28 items on the SAS provide a strong operational framework for evaluating the ability of all involved with patient care and decision making to connect or to be sensitive to the spiritual dimensions of others and possibly frame how to approach the emotional needs of others. If a care provider has not developed the capacity to connect with others, providing care that requires embracing a viewpoint outside of his or her personal sphere of perception is extremely difficult. Behavior modification of the patient, significant others, or health care team members may be necessary as part of facilitating compliance with life changes for the patient and significant others resulting from the hospitalization. Values may collide, based on the past experiences of all involved. Staying focused on the present can assist all involved in remaining objective when approaching the situation.

Box 2-1 ELEMENTS OF THE HOWDEN SPIRITUAL ASSESSMENT SCALE (SAS)

Has a Sense of Belongingness Feels Part of the Community Lived In
Has Capacity to Forgive Feels Reconciling Relationships Is Important
Can Rise Above or Go Beyond Mental and Physical Problems Can Rise Above or Go Beyond Body Changes or Body Losses
Is Concerned about Environmental Destruction Feels Responsible for Preserving the Planet
Can Find Peace during a Devastating Event Has Inner Resources for Dealing with Uncertainty
Has a Sense of Kinship to Others Has Found Inner Strength during Past Struggles
Has a Connection to All of Life Possesses Life Goals and Aims
Relies on Inner Strength When Struggling Possesses Inner Strength
Enjoys Serving Others Feels a Sense of Fulfillment in Life
Has a Sense of Inner Spiritual Guidance Trusts Life Is Good Despite Discouraging Events
Perceives Ability for Self-Healing Feels Good About Themselves
Perceives Meaning of Life Provides Peace Has the Sense Life Has Meaning and Purpose
Feels a Sense of Balance Within Life Feels Inner Harmony and Peace
Boundaries of Personal Universe Extend Beyond Space and Time Inner Strength Is Related to Belief in a Higher Power or Supreme Being

Items are rated 1 (Strongly disagree) through 6 (Strongly agree) on a Likert scale after reading statements about the elements listed here.

Howden JW: Development and psychometric characteristics of the Spirituality Assessment Scale. Dissert Abstr Int 54(1):166B, 1992. Abstract reproduced with permission from ProQuest LLC. © 2007 ProQuest LLC; all rights reserved. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission.

Assessment of need for emotional and spiritual support

History and risk factors

Innumerable variables affect coping and decision making. The factors listed in Box 2-1 have been demonstrated by various studies to affect how decisions are made and may adversely affect coping because of a difference in beliefs related to spirituality. Difficulty coping may be more likely if the patient or any member of the decision-making team has a poor self-image, is unfulfilled in life, has significant financial problems, has developed unhealthy dependent relationships with others, is extremely resistant to change, has no sense of meaning or purpose in their life, has difficulty learning, has unrepaired significant relationships, has a poor sense of belongingness, does not feel inner peace or inner strength, is unable to forgive others for past offenses, has difficulty relating to others, cannot feel a sense of connectedness to others, or is unclear about life goals.

CARE PLANS: EMOTIONAL AND SPIRITUAL SUPPORT OF THE PATIENT, FAMILY, AND SIGNIFICANT OTHERS

Anxiety

related to actual or perceived threat of death; change in health status; threat to self-concept or role; unfamiliar people and environment; the unknown

Goals/outcomes:

Within 12 hours of intervention, anxiety is absent or reduced as evidenced by patient’s verbalization of same, heart rate (HR) less than or equal to 100 beats/min, RR less than or equal to 20 breaths/min, and an absence of or decrease in irritability and restlessness. Family members are calmer.

image Anxiety Level, Anxiety: Self-Control, Concentration, Coping

Anxiety reduction

1. Engage in honest communication with the patient and family; empathize. Actively listen, and establish an atmosphere that enables free expression. Express to patient that you care about his or her health.

2. Assess level of anxiety with patient and family. Be alert to verbal and nonverbal cues:

3. For severe anxiety or panic state, refer to appropriate psychiatric health care team member.

4. If hyperventilation occurs, encourage slow, deep breaths by having patient or significant other mimic your own breathing pattern.

5. Validate the nursing assessment of anxiety with the patient or significant other. (“You seem distressed; are you feeling anxious or overwhelmed?”)

6. After an episode of anxiety, review and discuss the thoughts and feelings that led to the episode.

7. Identify coping behaviors currently being used (e.g., denial, anger, repression, withdrawal, daydreaming, drug or alcohol dependence). Review coping behaviors used in the past. Assist in using adaptive coping to manage anxiety.

8. Encourage expression of fears, concerns, and questions. (“I know this room looks like a maze of wires and tubes; please let me know when you have any questions.”)

9. Reduce sensory overload by providing an organized, quiet environment. See Alterations in Consciousness, p. 24.

10. Introduce self and other health care team members; explain each individual’s role as it relates to the plan of care or care map.

11. Teach relaxation and imagery techniques. See Sample Relaxation Technique, Appendix 7.

12. Enable support persons to be in attendance whenever possible.

13. Consult palliative care services if available and appropriate.

14. Engage in and promote awareness of touch to significant others when appropriate. Kinds of touch are described in Box 2-2.

imageCoping Enhancement; Calming Technique, Active Listening, Presence

Social isolation

imagerelated to altered health status; inability to engage in satisfying personal relationships; altered mental status; altered physical appearance

Compromised family coping

related to situational crisis (patient’s illness)

Goals/outcomes

imageAfter intervention, family/significant others demonstrate effective adaptation to change/traumatic situation as evidenced by seeking external support when necessary and sharing concerns.

image Family Coping, Family Normalization

Coping enhancement

1. Assess character of family/significant others: social, environmental, ethnic, and cultural factors; relationships; and role patterns. Identify developmental stage. Be aware that other situational or maturational crises may be ongoing, such as an older parent or teenager with a learning disability.

2. Assess previous adaptive behaviors. (“How do you react in stressful situations?”) Discuss observed conflicts and communication breakdown. (“I noticed that your brother would not visit your mother today. Has there been a problem we should be aware of? Knowing about it may help us better care for your mother.”)

3. Acknowledge the family’s/significant others’ involvement in patient care, and promote strengths. (“You were able to encourage your wife to turn and cough. That is very important to her recovery.”) Encourage participation in patient care conferences. Promote frequent, regular patient visits.

4. Provide information and guidance related to the patient. Discuss the stresses of hospitalization, and encourage discussions of feelings, such as anger, guilt, hostility, depression, fear, or sorrow. (“You seem to be upset since having been told that your husband is not leaving the hospital today.”) Refer to clergy, case manager, clinical nurse specialist, social services, or palliative care specialist as appropriate.

5. Evaluate interactions among patient and family/significant others. Encourage reorganization of roles and priority setting as appropriate. (“I know your husband is concerned about his insurance policy and seems to expect you to investigate it. I’ll ask the financial counselor to talk with you.”)

6. Encourage family/significant others to schedule periods of rest and activity outside the critical care unit and to seek support when necessary. (“Your neighbor volunteered to stay in the waiting room this afternoon. Would you like to rest at home? I’ll call you if anything changes.”)

imageFamily Support; Family Process Maintenance; Normalization Promotion, Financial Resource Assistance

Fear

related to patient’s life-threatening condition; lack of information

Goals/outcomes

After intervention, patient and family/significant others relate that fear has been lessened or is manageable.

image Fear Level, Fear Self-Control

Security enhancement

Box 2-3 SAFETY PRECAUTIONS IN THE EVENT OF VIOLENT BEHAVIOR

imageCoping Enhancement; Calming Technique; Support System Enhancement