Management of Alopecia

Published on 22/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2458 times

Chapter 6 Management of Alopecia

With current techniques, hair transplants can look totally natural and without signs that a procedure has been performed. 1 Hair transplantation has, however, a poor reputation because so many patients in the past have had less than acceptable results. 2 Scalp reconstruction with flaps and excisions and the use of tissue expanders for male patients with genetic hair loss are now rarely used except in the management of difficult secondary cases. 3–20

Introduction

With current techniques, hair transplants can look totally natural and without signs that a procedure has been performed.1 Hair transplantation has, however, a poor reputation because so many patients in the past have had less than acceptable results.2 Scalp reconstruction with flaps and excisions and the use of tissue expanders for male patients with genetic hair loss are now rarely used except in the management of difficult secondary cases.320

Improvements in results in the past 15 years are due to the work of many in the field, and in particular, Dr Carlos Uebel from Brazil,21,22 who was one of the first to popularize the use of small natural-appearing grafts in large numbers performed at a single session. Today, rather than transferring a few hundred grafts at each session requiring numerous procedures, it is not unusual to transfer 1500, 2000, and even 3000 grafts in a single session.

Importance of Type of Graft and Design of a Natural Hairline

A discussion of transplantation usually refers to micro or mini grafts.23 Current nomenclature uses the term follicular grafts,2426 which are clusters of one to three hairs that emerge from the scalp as a unit. Grafts often used to contain 10, 20, and even 40 hairs per each graft, so creating an unnatural appearance (Fig. 6.1A&B), and the hairline was often poorly designed. A successful and aesthetically pleasing hair restoration is as demanding as any other aesthetic facial procedure.

The frontotemporal recession is an important component of creating a mature natural hairline in males.27 This anatomic landmark is formed by the junction of two lines, consisting of the frontal and temporal hairlines, which converge in an acute angle. It is critical in creating a natural-appearing male hair transplant to maintain this normal frontotemporal recession. In hair restorations where the frontotemporal angle is not created, the patient frequently has an un-natural result, creating either a feminine or immature male hairline.

Other important components of a natural hairline include the transition anteriorly from fine to thicker hair with increasing density, and a significant degree of irregularity along the hairline margin. Normal hairlines should not appear straight and regular. Perfectly straight hairlines are characteristic of unnatural-appearing hair transplants. Unsatisfactory results with hair transplants usually demonstrate a fundamental lack of knowledge of these critical points required to create a natural-appearing hairline.28

Indications

Most patients seeking hair restoration due to genetic hair loss are male. Approximately 15% of patients who have primary alopecia in my current practice are women and demonstrate typical genetic pattern hair loss. The other main group of patients have had previous hair transplantation with poor results;2931 these patients are more difficult to treat and fall into two groups:

One of the main indications in women is secondary or traumatic alopecia after procedures such as facelifts or forehead lifts. In these patients hair loss results from excessive tension or undermining of the hair follicle.32 Such women are ideal for hair transplantation because scars or abnormally high hairlines can be readily corrected. The most common area needing hair transplantation is probably the temporal and preauricular area.

Male Androgenic Alopecia

In most men, hair loss is related to androgenic alopecia. This form of alopecia is a response to androgens, which reduce the rate of hair growth as well as the diameter of the hair shaft.33 Also, the growth phase of hair referred to as anagen is shortened. It is believed that testosterone is converted by the enzyme 5-alpha reductase to dihydrotestosterone (DHT),34 which targets the hair and causes genetic hair loss. In most men with hair loss, the hair follicles in the frontal and crown regions appear to be most susceptible to DHT, leading to androgenic alopecia. In most patients, 30–50% of the hair has been lost before it becomes apparent. As the average normal head has 100 000–150 000 hairs, a significant amount of hair loss is necessary before it becomes apparent.

Female Hair Loss

Female hair loss is frequently more diffuse, and many women are not good candidates for hair restoration because of a lack of good donor hair.35 However, a subgroup of women present with hair loss similar to androgenic alopecia36 and usually have good hair density in the lateral and posterior areas of the scalp. Many of these women have a history compatible with that seen in male pattern hair loss and report many family members with either thin hair or balding scalps.

Unlike male pattern hair loss of the genetic form, women with genetic hair loss tend to maintain a low frontal hairline with an anterior margin of hair (Fig. 6.2A&B). This is very different from men where there is progressive elevation of the frontal hairline and increasing temporal recession over time. Women, however, frequently maintain a frontal hairline for life, and this factor requires hair transplantation to be performed, beginning from the frontal hairline and continuing posteriorly to fill in the defect.

Most women who present with hair loss are not candidates for hair transplantation because the hair loss is usually caused by a metabolic disorder, autoimmune disease or other factors.

Patient Selection

One factor that makes hair restoration unique compared to other areas of aesthetic surgery is the unpredictability of future hair loss. Evaluation and prognosis of male pattern hair loss can be difficult. It is critical to take into consideration not only the family history, but also the patient’s age. Patients in their early 20s often have a significant amount of unpredictable future hair loss, and it is important to explain the possible effects of hair transplantation at too early an age:

As in all areas of aesthetic surgery, realistic expectations of what can be accomplished with hair restoration are important.

Because hair loss is progressive, it is often better to wait until the third and fourth decades before considering transplantation. Also, as a young patient ages, there may also be recession of the hairline.

Another factor that must be carefully considered is hair transplantation of the occipital region. If the patient is relatively young or destined to have significant hair loss in the occipital area, overtransplantation centrally in the occipital area can lead to a bizarre appearance as he ages. Typically, there is hair loss in a coronal pattern around the area of transplantation, which leads to a halo of baldness. This will require further procedures to maintain a reasonable appearance. It is therefore important to evaluate the patient’s future hair loss based upon their hair characteristic and family history.

Preoperative History and Considerations

Hair normally passes through three cycles (Fig. 6.3A&B).37

Approximately 10% of hair is in the telogen phase at any one period. Therefore, most individuals with 100 000 or more hairs tend not to notice hair loss during the telogen phase. However, in the patient who has already lost a significant amount of hair, the telogen phase may be far more important.

After a hair transplant the hair transferred goes into a 3–4-month resting phase. It is important to inform patients that it will therefore take months to see the final result because of the delayed hair growth after transplantation.

Hair Type

An important component of the initial patient evaluation includes an assessment of hair type. This includes the color, texture, density, and curling or straightness of the hair.

Goals of Transplantation

On initial consultation, certain variables must be considered to assist the patient in making the appropriate decision and to set realistic goals concerning hair transplantation.

Hairline

It is important that the patient understands that the goal is to create a hairline that is harmonious with their facial characteristics and to create balance. One term that is frequently used is facial framing (Fig. 6.6A&B). This creates a more balanced appearance in the anatomic components of the face. Typically, the face can be divided into equal thirds, but in a patient who has a receding hairline, the eyes appear to have a more centralized appearance; creating a lower hairline produces better balance by framing the facial characteristics.

Patients in their 20s and 30s often dislike their bald appearance, not only because of the hair loss but also because they often look years or decades older than their actual age. Framing of the face improves the appearance, making the individual appear years younger.

During the consultation, it is useful to draw the proposed transplantation pattern on the patient’s scalp and to allow the patient to see it (i.e. the most appropriate hairline) in a mirror. Patients given a marking pen will frequently draw the hairline in a relatively low position, which is usually not appropriate because a relatively youthful hairline now may lead to problems and dissatisfaction later. A demonstration of the Norwood classification allows patients to understand the normal nature of androgenic alopecia as hair recedes. A natural hairline will age appropriately with the patient as temporal recession and elevation in the frontal hairline progresses. For most patients the frontal hairline should be at least 8–10 cm above the glabella (Fig. 6.7A&B).

Operative Approach

Surgical Anatomy

The concept of donor or recipient site dominance introduced by Orentrich in 1959 is important for successful hair transplantation. Donor dominant grafts maintain the characteristics of the donor site in the new recipient site. For example hair taken from the back of the scalp maintains its characteristics when it is moved to the frontal area and will continue to be relatively permanent hair in its new site because it is rare for men to lose hair in the very posterior scalp area.

Initially, Orentrich used large round punch grafts 3.5–5 mm in diameter. These grafts with multiple hairs in a clustered pattern created a doll’s hair or cornrow appearance. Over time, smaller plugs were developed containing 6–10 hairs, but these also resulted in an unnatural appearance. It was not until micrografting with one and two hairs per graft became the standard that more natural results were obtained.

Hair is now known to grow in follicular units in which there is a clustering of 1–4 hairs (Fig. 6.9). The number of hairs varies greatly, based on the patient’s hair type and hair characteristics. To create a natural result, it is critical to use these follicular units to avoid unnatural bunching of hair, and to use magnification during the dissection and preparation of these grafts to create appropriate follicular units (Figs 6.10 and 6.11). A team approach is therefore required with skilled individuals who cut the grafts and assist in their placement during procedures that often entail 2000–3000 grafts per session.

Surgical Technique

Although the equipment and instrumentation for hair transplant is relatively simple, the technique itself can be relatively complex, especially when large numbers of grafts are being transplanted at one time. The technique described here has been developed by Carlos Uebel of Brazil and has significantly simplified the performance of large transplantation sessions using small, natural-appearing grafts.

Strip width can vary by 1–2 cm. Most of the donor hair is obtained by taking relatively long strips 12–15 cm in length (Fig. 6.13). In most patients, a strip greater than 1.6–1.8 cm wide will require mobilization of the scalp for proper closure without tension. There is significant mobility of the posterior neck, which allows a relatively easy closure in most patients. Another important aspect is to harvest future donor strips using the same original incision to avoid multiple scars.
Closure can be achieved in a variety of ways. My preferred technique is a double layer closure of 3–0 Vicryl sutures in the deep layer and 3–0 nylon on the surface (Figs 6.16 and 6.17). Although the staple will give a rapid closure, the resulting scar in the posterior scalp tends not to be as good as that resulting from a running surgical closure.

After the strip has been removed (Fig. 6.18), it is cut horizontally in a bread loaf fashion into cross-sectional segments several mm wide (Fig. 6.19). These are cut by the assistants (Box 6.1) into the individual grafts under magnification (Fig. 6.20). Each graft should contain the hair shaft, follicle and surrounding fat, and should be kept on ice-chilled moist saline towels and trays to prevent desiccation (Fig. 6.21). The hair follicles are then viable for several hours.
The graft is positioned and then pushed in into the appropriate depth (Fig. 6.23). Placing the graft too deep will result in inclusion cysts. Proper placement, rotating the graft into its proper alignment, is also important. The slits are made at a specific angle to allow growth of the hair in the appropriate direction and angulation. I make a slight modification of the #11 blade to approximate the size of the graft to reduce popping out (Fig. 6.24). The graft is held in place initially by only a little thrombin, and the more that the graft is equivalent to the size of the slit made by the #11 blade, the less the grafts pop out and the better the fixation.

Once the Uebel technique has been mastered by two individuals working together, 600–700 grafts can be inserted per hour.

The best techniques require the simplest instrumentation. The use of punches and electrical coring devices to create punch grafts are no longer considered acceptable because of the size of the grafts obtained and the final appearance of the result.

Anesthesia

Hair transplantation can be carried out in the office with local anesthesia and acquiring good anesthesia is relatively simple. Knowledge of the anatomy of the nerves in the scalp allows a satisfactory level of local anesthesia in both the donor and the recipient areas (Fig. 6.25).

Anesthesia is achieved with a dilute epinephrine solution, initially blocking the occipital nerves posteriorly in the donor site (Fig. 6.26). This is followed by tumescence of a very dilute solution in the area to distend the posterior scalp off the galea.

In the recipient area anteriorly, anesthesia is accomplished with both a ring block and occasionally, supraorbital nerve blocks, which facilitate the injection of the ring block.

Because the anatomy of the scalp nerves is so predictable, it is relatively easy to gain rapid anesthesia during these procedures.

Occasionally, the patients can be given a small dose of oral diazepam; however, most patient are completely comfortable during the procedure once the blocks and tumescent fluid are inserted. The addition of bupivacaine can extend the duration of anesthesia to the scalp area, especially when large numbers of grafts (2000–3000) are done during a single procedure.

Scalp Excisions

In general, scalp excisions are now primarily used for difficult or secondary cases, and few patients receive a scalp excision in the standard management of male pattern baldness.

In the past, however, scalp excisions were often performed in conjunction with hair transplantation4245 to reduce the total surface that required transplantation. The most frequent technique was midline excision of non-hairbearing scalp with advancement of the lateral hairbearing scalp flaps toward the midline. Usually this only partially reduces the area requiring transplantation and creates several problems. Advancing lateral flaps superiorly creates an abnormal hair pattern with divergence of the hair away from midline, resulting in a midline scar, which creates a slot deformity; even with aggressive mobilization there is significant stretch back, leading to a wide scar, with hair diverging away from the scar.46 The final result was often far less than optimal. Attempts have been made to reduce the amount of stretch back or scar widening using various techniques47,48 by reducing the tension of the incision closure with unique sutures and elastic membranes internally.

Scalp excisions for secondary alopecia

Scalp excisions are particularly useful in secondary cases. Patients who have had large plug grafts placed too low on the forehead or temporal region cannot usually be treated with just further hair grafting. Patients who have had plug grafts can be treated with:

In selected patients, the best option is complete excision of the unsightly anterior plugs with superior advancement of the forehead followed by regrafting (Fig. 6.27A-D). At the time of the excision, the large plug grafts are recut into micrografts and reinserted at the same time.

Secondary procedures consist of further grafting to conceal the scar and to thicken up the transplanted hair. This excisional technique combined with forehead advancement can give dramatic results. To prevent widening of the scar and to stabilize the forehead position, it is helpful to use bony fixation.

The procedure requires mobilization of the entire forehead to the level of the eyebrows. Unlike a forehead lift, however, where the goal is elevation of the eyebrows, the goal is elevation of the abnormally low hairline leaving the eyebrows in their original position. Several methods are used to accomplish bony fixation, including bony tunnels, Mitek sutures, and Endotyne devices. All these work well to maintain forehead elevation.

Complications and Side Effects

Hair transplantation has a low incidence of complications when properly performed.

References

1. Orentreich N. Autografts in alopecia and other selected dermatological conditions. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1959;83:463.

2. Fisher J. Revision of the unfavorable result in hair transplantation. Plast Surg. 2005:167-178.

3. Manders E.K., Graham W.D.III, Schenden M.J.L. Skin expansion to eliminate large scalp defects. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12:305.

4. Juri J. Use of parieto-occipital flaps in the surgical treatment of baldness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;55:456.

5. Juri J., Juri C., Arufe H.N. Use of rotation scalp flaps for treatment of occipital baldness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61:23.

6. Elliott R.A. Lateral flaps for instant results in male pattern baldness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;60:699.

7. Flemming R.W., Mayer T.G. Short and long scalp flaps in the treatment of male pattern baldness. Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107:403.

8. Ohmori K. Free scalp flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;65:42.

9. Adson M.D., Anderson R.D., Argenta L.C. Scalp expansion in the treatment of male pattern baldness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79:906.

10. Elliott R.A. Lateral flaps for instant results in male pattern baldness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;60:699.

11. Mayer T.G., Fleming R.W., Patterson A.S. Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the scalp. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1992;39-45.

12. Manders E.K., Graham W.P.III. Alopecia reduction by scalp expansion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1984;10:967.

13. Argenta L.C., Marks M.W., Anderson R.R.D. Treatment of male pattern baldness by tissue expansion. In: Courtiss E.H., editor. Male aesthetic surgery. 2nd edn. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1991:212-225.

14. Anderson R.D. The expanded ‘BAT’ flap for treatment of male pattern baldness. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;31:385.

15. Anderson R.D. New expanded scalp flap techniques for elimination of male pattern baldness. In: Unger W.P., editor. Hair transplantation. 3rd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995:673.

16. Fisher J. Discussion: correction of the cornrow transplant and other common problems in surgical hair restoration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1528.

17. Under M.G. The Y-shaped pattern of alopecia reduction and its variations. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1984;10:980.

18. Unger M.G., Unger W.P. Midline alopecia reduction combined with hair transplantation. Head Neck Surg. 1985;7:303.

19. Alt T.H. Scalp reduction as an adjunct to hair transplantation. Review of the relevant literature and presentation of an improved technique. J Dermol Surg Oncol. 1980;6:1011.

20. Nahai F, Fisher J. Reoperation, refinement and treatment of complications after hair transplantation. The art of aesthetic surgery, principles and techniques. 47; 1766–1785.

21. Uebel C.O. Micrografts and minigrafts: a new approach to baldness surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;27:476.

22. Uebel C.O. Hair replacement surgery: micrografts and flaps. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000.

23. Nordstrom R.E.A. Micrografts’ for improvement of the frontal hairline after hair transplantation. Aesthetic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;5:97.

24. Bernstein R.M., Rassman W.R. Follicular transplantation, patient evaluation and surgical planning. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:771.

25. Berstein R.M., Rassman W.R. The aesthetics of follicular transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:785.

26. Bernstein R.M., Rassman W.R. The logic of follicular unit transplantation. Dermatol Clin. 1999;17:277.

27. Fisher J. Hair restoration. In: Plastic Surgery 59:658

28. Guyuron B, Dinarso Evans & Pershing. Treatment of soft tissue. Hair transplantation. 7:883–890.

29. Vogel J.E. Correction of the cornrow hair transplantation and other common problems in surgical hair restoration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1528.

30. Epstein J.S. Revision of surgical hair restoration: repair of undesirable results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999:104-222.

31. Swinehart J.M. Hair repair surgery. Corrective measures for improvement of older large-graft procedures and scalp scars. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:523-528.

32. Berrera A. The use of micrografts and mini grafts for the correction of the postrhytidectomy lost sideburn. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:2277.

33. Schweikert H.U., Wilson J.D. Androgen metabolism in isolated human hair roots. In: Orfanos C.E., Montagna W., Stuttgen G., editors. Hair Research. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981:210-214.

34. Kaufman K.D. 5a-Reductase inhibitors. Dermatol Ther. 1998;8:42.

35. DeVillez R.L., Jacobs J.P., Szpunar C.A., Warner M.L. Androgenetic alopecia in the female. Treatment with 2% topical minoxidil solution. Arch Dermatol. 1994:130-303.

36. Halsner U., Lucas M. New aspects in hair transplantation for females. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21:605.

37. Nigman A.M. The human hair cycles. J Invest Dermatol. 1959;33:307.

38. Norwood O.T. A classification of male pattern baldness. South Med J. 1975;68:1359.

39. Hamilton J.B. Patterned loss of hair in man: types and incidence. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1951;53:708.

40. Bouhanna P., Dardour J.C. Hair Replacement Surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.

41. Ludwig E. Classification of the types of androgenic alopecia (common baldness) arising in the female sex. Br J Dermatol. 1977;97:319.

42. Unger M.G. The Y-shaped pattern of alopecia reduction and its variations. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1984;10:980.

43. Unger M.G., Unger W.P. Midline alopecia reduction combined with hair transplantation. Head Neck Surg. 1985;7:303.

44. Alt T.H. Scalp reduction as an adjunct to hair transplantation. Review of the relevant literature and presentation of an improved technique. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1980;6:1011.

45. Marzola M. Combination of lateral scalp reductions and preauricular flaps and hair replacement without punch grafts. In: Unger W., Nordstrom R., editors. Hair Transplantation. 2nd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1988:691-705.

46. Nordstrom R.E. Stretch-back in scalp reductions for male pattern baldness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73:422.

47. Frechet P. Scalp extension. In: Unger W.P., editor. Hair Transplantation. 3rd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995:625-657.

48. Nordstrom R.E.A., Greco M., Raposio E. The ‘Nordstrom suture’ to enhance scalp reductions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:577.