Mammographic and Ultrasound Analysis of Breast Masses

Published on 12/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Radiology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 3.7 (3 votes)

This article have been viewed 11796 times

Chapter 4 Mammographic and Ultrasound Analysis of Breast Masses

The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) lexicon defines a breast mass as a three-dimensional space-occupying lesion seen on at least two mammographic projections. Benign masses do not invade surrounding tissue and will usually have pushing or round borders. Malignant masses extend through the basement membrane and invade the surrounding glandular tissue. Because of this, and with few exceptions, cancers produce an irregularly shaped mass with indistinct or spiculated margins. Thus, radiologists look carefully at the shape of a mass and at its margins to determine if it represents cancer.

Ultrasound goes hand in hand with mammography in evaluation of breast masses. Ultrasound shows whether the mass is a cyst or a solid mass, and defines the shape, border, and internal characteristics of solid masses to help determine if the mass is malignant or benign. This chapter reviews mammographic and ultrasound analysis of breast masses.

Mammographic Technique and Analysis

On mammograms, a true mass is a ball-shaped object. The mass should look about the same size, shape, and density in orthogonal mammogram projections because the hard mass is harder than the surrounding glandular tissue. Radiologists often struggle to determine if a focal asymmetry is a mass or if it represents overlapping normal breast tissue. Fine-detail views such as spot compression or spot compression magnification mammograms show the shape and margins of the mass in greater detail. Mass shapes and borders are easiest to assess when displayed against a fatty background; thus, spot magnification views are most optimal in a projection in which the mass overlies fat.

The ACR BI-RADS® lexicon (Table 4-1) defines mass shapes as round, oval, lobular, or irregular. As the mass shape becomes more irregular, the probability of cancer increases (Fig. 4-1A).

Table 4-1 American College of Radiology BI-RADS® Mass Descriptors

Shape Margin Density

BI-RADS®, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

From American College of Radiology: ACR BI-RADS®—mammography, ed 4, In ACR Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System, breast imaging atlas, Reston, VA, 2003, American College of Radiology.

The ACR BI-RADS® lexicon describes mass margins as circumscribed (well-defined or sharply defined), microlobulated, obscured by surrounding glandular tissue, indistinct, or spiculated (see Fig. 4-1B to E). As with mass shape, as the mass margin becomes more spiculated the probability of cancer increases. Masses with well-circumscribed borders are likely to be benign, and less than 10% of cancers are smooth. Microlobulated masses have small undulations, like petals on a flower, and are more worrisome for cancer than are smooth masses. An obscured mass has a border hidden by overlapping adjacent fibroglandular tissue; as a result, that border cannot be assessed. An indistinct mass is worrisome for carcinoma because it suggests that the surrounding glandular tissue is infiltrated by malignancy. Finally, spiculated masses are characterized by thin lines radiating from the central portion of the mass and are especially worrisome for cancer. When caused by cancer, spiculations are due to productive tumor fibrosis or growth of tumor into the surrounding glandular tissue.

Mass density is described by noting how white a mass looks compared to an equal volume of fibroglandular tissue. High-density masses are whiter than fibroglandular tissue, and low-density masses are blacker than fibroglandular tissue. High-density masses are especially worrisome for cancer, because they may contain cells with a higher atomic number than normal glandular tissue and fat. Low-density masses and masses with density equal to that of surrounding fibroglandular tissue are less worrisome for cancer. However, low-density cancers, such as mucinous cancers, do exist; these cancers are low-density because they contain mucin.

Fat-containing masses are almost always benign, except for the rare liposarcoma. Fat-containing masses include lymph nodes, oil cysts, hamartomas, and fat necrosis.

Masses can have associated findings that can indicate cancer (listed in Box 4-1). Associated findings worrisome for cancer include skin or nipple retraction, skin or trabecular thickening, axillary adenopathy, architectural distortion, and calcifications (see Fig. 4-1F to I).

Box 4-1

American College of Radiology BI-RADS® Associated Findings

BI-RADS®, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

From American College of Radiology: ACR BI-RADS®—mammography, ed 4, In ACR Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System, breast imaging atlas, Reston, VA, 2003, American College of Radiology.

Associated calcifications in or around a suspicious mass are important for two reasons. If the mass is cancer, calcifications around it may represent ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Subsequent excisional biopsy must remove both the mass and all surrounding suspicious calcifications to excise the entire malignancy (Box 4-2). Knowing the extent of the suspicious calcifications helps the surgeon plan the excision (Fig. 4-2). Second, suspicious calcifications inside a mass may be the only clue that the mass is a cancer.

At histology DCIS constituting more than 25% of an invasive ductal cancer is said to be an extensive intraductal component (EIC); such a cancer is called EIC-positive (EIC+). Because EIC+ tumors have an increased risk of local recurrence, breast-conserving surgery is less successful. This is one of the reasons to always look for calcifications when a suspicious mass is present.

Other important associated mammographic findings include skin thickening, which may indicate breast edema or focal tumor invasion; skin retraction or nipple retraction as a result of focal tumor tethering; axillary lymph node metastases; and architectural distortion.

Ultrasound Technique and Analysis of Masses

The ACR BI-RADS® ultrasound lexicon describes terms and features of breast masses that are key for the diagnosis of cancer (Table 4-2). Stavros and colleagues established another set of terms that are often used in evaluating breast masses (Box 4-3). Illustrations of these features are shown in Chapter 5.

Evaluation of a breast mass on ultrasound starts with determining whether the mass is cystic or solid. Simple cysts are anechoic (all black inside), round or oval, circumscribed, have an abrupt interface with surrounding tissue, have a thin posterior wall, and are enhanced through sound transmission. Simple cysts can be dismissed. On the other hand, solid breast masses have internal echoes and could be either cancer or a benign mass. Radiologists look at masses to evaluate the mass boundary, internal echo pattern, and acoustic features; its effect on surrounding breast tissue; and the presence and location of calcifications to determine if a solid mass is cancer.

After scanning, the technologist takes representative pictures of the mass and labels the images to clarify the mass’s location in the breast. This makes the mass easier to find on repeat ultrasound examinations. Ultrasound labeling includes which breast was scanned (left or right), position of the mass in terms of breast clock face or quadrant, location in centimeters from the nipple, scan angle (radial or antiradial, transverse or longitudinal), and the technologist’s initials. The technologist captures the image without and with measuring calipers on the muscle (Box 4-4). It is also helpful to indicate whether the mass is palpable or nonpalpable.

Ultrasound findings suggestive of cancer include an irregular shape, noncircumscribed margins, a thick echogenic rim or halo, duct extension or other effect on surrounding breast tissue, microcalcifications, taller-than-wide configuration, and acoustic spiculation or acoustic shadowing. Benign ultrasound findings include no malignant features, a circumscribed border, intense homogeneous hyperechogenicity, fewer than four gentle lobulations, wider-than-tall configuration, and a thin echogenic capsule. Because benign and malignant features in solid masses overlap, common sense plays a major role in patient management for solid masses, especially if the mass looks benign but the clinical scenario is suspicious (new mass, strong family history).

Correlating Palpable and Nonpalpable Masses on Mammography and Ultrasound

A common problem is correlating palpable masses with ultrasound findings. To do this, the radiologist or technologist places an examining finger or a cotton-tipped swab directly on the palpable mass. The sonographer scans over the finger or cotton-tipped swab on the mass to generate a ring-down shadow. Subsequent removal of the finger or cotton-tipped swab from under the probe produces a scan of the palpable finding. Then the radiologist, technologist, and patient have no doubt that the palpable finding has been scanned because this technique ensures that the transducer is placed directly on the palpable finding.

Sometimes a palpable mass on the mammogram has to be correlated to the ultrasound and physical finding. Specifically, the radiologist has to show that the palpable mass, from the ultrasound and from the mammogram, are one and the same. To do this correlation, the radiologist or technologist finds the palpable mass, scans over it, and sees if an ultrasound mass is present. If a mass is present, the sonographer scans the mass and places a finger or cotton-tipped swab on the mass. The sonographer puts an indelible ink mark on the skin over the mass and places a skin marker over the palpable finding, then repeats the mammogram. If the marker is at or near the mammographic finding, the palpable, mammographic, and ultrasound findings all correlate with each other.

To correlate nonpalpable ultrasound findings with mammographic findings, the sonographer identifies the ultrasound finding and places a finger, cotton-tipped swab, or large unwound paper clip under the transducer so that a ring-down shadow is superimposed over the finding. The sonographer removes the transducer and marks this location on the skin with an indelible ink marker. A technologist places a metallic skin marker, such as a BB, on the ink spot and takes orthogonal mammographic views. The skin marker over the ultrasound finding should be in the same location as the mammographic finding on the films. It should be expected that even if the mammogram and ultrasound findings are the same, the mammographic finding might be 1 cm or more away from the skin marker on the films because the skin marker will be compressed away from the mass on the mammogram by the compression paddle.

Sometimes it is still uncertain whether an ultrasound and mammographic finding are one and the same. If the patient agrees to a biopsy of the ultrasound finding, the radiologist places a metallic marker into the mass using an ultrasound-guided, percutaneously placed needle after the biopsy (Fig. 4-3). Repeat mammograms should show the marker in the mass if the two findings are the same. Alternatively, a retractable hookwire may be placed in the mass. A mammogram with the wire in place will show that the ultrasound finding and the mammographic finding represent the same mass. The radiologist can subsequently remove the retractable hookwire.

The mammography and ultrasound report for a breast mass should describe if the mass is palpable; the size, shape, margin, and density of the mass; its location and associated findings; and any change from previous examinations, if known. The report should also include ultrasound finding descriptors and whether it correlates with the mammographic finding. Finally, each report that includes a mammogram should be assigned an ACR BI-RADS® final assessment code indicating the level of suspicion for cancer and follow-up management recommendations (Box 4-5).

Box 4-5

American College of Radiology BI-RADS® Mass Reporting

BI-RADS®, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

From American College of Radiology: ACR BI-RADS®—mammography, ed 4, In ACR Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System, breast imaging atlas, Reston, VA, 2003, American College of Radiology.

Masses with Spiculated Borders and Sclerosing Features (Box 4-6)

Cancer

Invasive Ductal Cancer

Invasive ductal carcinoma is the most common breast cancer and accounts for approximately 90% of all cancers. Also known as invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS), invasive ductal cancer usually grows as a hard irregular mass in the breast (Fig. 4-4). The classic appearance of invasive ductal cancer is a dense irregular or spiculated mass, occasionally containing pleomorphic calcifications or having adjacent pleomorphic calcifications representing DCIS. On the mammogram, the mass should be about the same size and density on two orthogonal mammographic views. Spot compression magnification views may show unsuspected calcifications in or around the mass or unsuspected irregular borders.

image image image

Figure 4-4 A to D, Spiculated invasive ductal cancers. A, A screening craniocaudal (CC) mammogram with a scar marker and mole marker shows a possible spiculated mass in the outer breast at the edge of the film (arrow). A spiculated mass is seen in the axilla on B, the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view, and the patient is recalled for a spot view, a lateral view, exaggerated CC, and ultrasound. C, On the exaggerated outer right CC view the mass is seen to greater advantage. D, In another patient, a spiculated retroareolar invasive ductal cancer (arrow) has caused nipple retraction (double arrow). A radiopaque marker has been placed on the nipple. In another patient, two spiculated masses are seen on CC (E) and MLO (F) views. Ultrasound of the spiculated masses shows an irregular mass (G) and a round mass (H) without sonographic spiculation. I, Spiculated invasive ductal cancer on magnification view has two benign-appearing calcifications within it. Note that even though the calcifications look benign, the spiculated borders of the mass are so worrisome for cancer that the worst finding overrides the benign look of the calcifications. Biopsy showed invasive ductal cancer. One should judge a mass with calcifications based on the worst characteristics of either the mass or the calcifications. J to L, Typical invasive ductal cancer findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J, The MRI shows a large enhancing mass growing through the pectoralis muscle with associated skin thickening. K, The ROI over the enhancing portion of the cancer on MRI selects the area in which a kinetic curve will be drawn. L, The kinetic curve shows rapid initial enhancement with a late-phase washout. The kinetic curve showing a rapid initial uptake and washout of contrast is very typical of cancer.

On ultrasound, spiculated masses shown on mammograms may be round, irregular, or spiculated. Spiculated masses commonly produce acoustic shadowing as a result of either productive fibrosis or tumor extension. When present, acoustic spiculation looks like thin radiating lines extending from the tumor into surrounding breast structures. In a dense white breast, the ultrasound spicules are dark against the white glandular tissue. In a fatty breast, the spicules are white against the dark fatty background. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the usual appearance of invasive ductal cancer is a brightly enhancing irregular mass with or without spiculation; enhancement is initially rapid, with a late-phase plateau or washout curve. Rim enhancement, central enhancement, or enhancing internal septations are other worrisome signs for invasive ductal cancer on MRI.

Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is most commonly seen as an equal- or high-density noncalcified mass, occasionally showing spiculations or ill-defined borders. ILC has a higher rate of bilaterality and multifocality than does invasive ductal cancer. ILC accounts for less than 10% of all invasive cancers, but historically is the most difficult breast cancer to see on mammograms (Box 4-7). ILC is the cancer that gives radiologists a bad name because it can be missed by mammography, at a rate reported by Brem and colleagues to be as high as 21%. This failure can be partly explained by the growth pattern of the carcinoma. Classically, ILC grows in single lines of tumor cells infiltrating the surrounding glandular tissue and may not produce a mass, making it difficult to see by mammography and difficult to feel by physical examination. ILC usually does not contain microcalcifications. It infiltrates the breast, is often seen on only one view, and may cause subtle distortion of the surrounding glandular tissue. When actually seen on the mammogram, ILC masses are often of equal or higher density than fibroglandular tissue and are seen because of the mass itself or its effect on surrounding tissue, such as architectural distortion and straightening of Cooper ligaments. As with any mass, distortion and tenting of glandular tissue caused by ILC are most easily seen in locations where Cooper ligaments extend out into surrounding fat, such as in the retroglandular fat or along the edge of the normal, scalloped fibroglandular tissue (Fig. 4-5).

image image image

Figure 4-5 A to C, Invasive lobular cancer seen on only one view. Screening mediolateral oblique (MLO) (A) and craniocaudal (CC) (B) views; the suggestion of a spiculated mass behind the nipple is seen on the left CC view only. C, A spot compression CC view shows persistent spiculation and distortion caused by the invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) behind the nipple on the left. The straight lines extending from the tumor into subcutaneous tissue are indicative of its presence. D, In another patient with ILC, a spiculated mass is seen at the edge of the film in the lower right breast on the right MLO view (arrow). The cancer looks very similar to the rest of the breast tissue and is seen only because of the spiculations extending into the fat and because it is a density where there is usually only fat. E, The MLO view in this patient shows a density behind the nipple, possibly a mass, but the nipple is not in profile. F, The right CC view with the nipple in profile now shows skin thickening and widespread architectural distortion throughout the entire breast tissue. G and H, On ultrasound, there is an extensive ILC with marked shadowing throughout the entire upper breast, with cancer in the entire breast on mastectomy. I and L, ILC presenting as a focal asymmetry. I, MLO paired mammograms show a focal asymmetry near the chest wall of the right breast. J, The CC mammogram shows a focal asymmetry in the medial right breast (arrow) roughly corresponding to the mass seen in the MLO view. K, Magnification cropped mammogram of the medial right CC study shows the mass that has caused the architectural distortion (arrow). L, Photographic magnification of the asymmetry shows not only a spiculated mass, but also tiny calcifications. This is invasive lobular cancer. Note that the mass is initially seen only because it is asymmetrically white on the initial mammograms.

On ultrasound, ILC is a hypoechoic, irregular, spiculated, or ill-defined mass that may or may not have acoustic shadowing. When ILC becomes very large, only the acoustic shadowing may be apparent; the mass itself can be difficult to see because of its large size. On MRI, invasive lobular cancer looks like a spiculated mass, with some limitations. Unfortunately, ILC has variable enhancing patterns; it can look like a mass, like a distortion of tissue, or like nodular regions connected by strands of tissue. Its enhancement kinetics can be similar to those of normal breast tissue and can thus be a cause of false-negative MRI examinations.

Postbiopsy Scar

On mammograms, an old postbiopsy scar looks like a spiculated mass that is impossible to distinguish from cancer. Postbiopsy scars show air and fluid at the biopsy site in the immediate postoperative period. Later, the air and fluid are absorbed and the surrounding glandular tissue is drawn to a central dense nidus of scar tissue. As a result, the mammogram shows a centrally dense spiculated mass (the scar) with straightening of the surrounding Cooper ligaments and indrawing of normal glandular tissue, simulating breast cancer. In some patients, no dense central nidus occurs, and the scar appears as a focal architectural distortion. On ultrasound, a postbiopsy scar is a hypoechoic mass with acoustic spiculation and shadowing, similar to cancer. There should be distortion of subcutaneous tissue extending from the scar on the patient’s skin down the plane of the incision to the spiculated postbiopsy scar.

The scar is not of concern for cancer if it occupies a surgical site (Box 4-8). To distinguish postbiopsy scars from cancer, the radiologist looks at the previous biopsy locations on the breast history form and reviews older films to see if the “scar” is at the same location. Some facilities place a radiopaque linear metallic scar marker on the patient’s skin scar to show the location on the mammogram (Fig. 4-7A to D). The metallic linear scar marker should be on top of the “scar” (see Fig. 4-7E and F). If the “scar” does not correspond to a postbiopsy site, it is not a scar. Because spiculated masses may represent cancer, they should be considered suspicious and should undergo biopsy.

Fat Necrosis, Sclerosing Adenosis, and Other Benign Breast Disease

Fat necrosis is due to saponification of fat from previous trauma, usually from surgery or blunt trauma due to an injury, such as from a steering wheel or seat belt in an automobile accident. On mammography, fat necrosis typically contains a fatty lipid center and is round, but it occasionally has a spiculated appearance. Other appearances include asymmetric opacity, round opacity, and dystrophic or pleomorphic calcifications. The diagnosis may be established by eliciting a history of blunt trauma or previous surgery. On occasion, fat necrosis contains a dense or equal-density central nidus with radiating folds extending from its center, similar to cancer, prompting biopsy. On ultrasound fat necrosis can appear cystic with or without posterior acoustic enhancement or internal echoes in about 30%, showing increased echogenicity in 27% and solid in approximately 14%, as reported by Bilgen and colleagues. With true fat necrosis, follow-up should show a decrease in size of masses; the occasional increasing fat necrosis lesion should undergo biopsy, leading to the diagnosis.

Sclerosing adenosis is a proliferative benign lesion resulting from mammary lobular hyperplasia. It is characterized by the formation of fibrous tissue that distorts and envelops the glandular tissue. The resulting process produces sclerosis of the surrounding tissue. The small duct lumens can contain microcalcifications. This results in spiculations and calcifications that, in mammography, can be difficult to distinguish from invasive cancer, resulting in biopsy.

Both sclerosing adenosis and proliferative fibrocystic change may have a slightly spiculated appearance on mammography; they occasionally also contain calcifications and can simulate cancer. When spiculated and associated with calcifications, fat necrosis, sclerosing adenosis and proliferative fibrocystic disease undergo biopsy and are a cause of false-positive biopsies (Fig. 4-8).

Radial Scar

A radial scar is a benign proliferative breast lesion that has nothing to do with a postbiopsy scar but looks like a spiculated mass or postbiopsy scar. Both radial scars and their larger variants, called complex sclerosing lesions, may include adenosis and hyperplasia. In autopsy series, small radial scars are common but often may not be apparent on mammography. The central part of a radial scar undergoes atrophy, thereby resulting in a scarlike formation, with pulling in of the surrounding glandular tissue that produces a spiculated mass. On occasion, because of entrapment of breast ductules, the radial scar may be difficult for pathologists to distinguish from infiltrating ductal carcinoma. However, both epithelial and myoepithelial cells in benign radial scars distinguish them from breast cancer. Radial scars may contain or be associated with atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, or cancer. This is one of the rationales for surgical excision. Some pathologists believe that a radial scar may be a precursor to tubular carcinoma and should be excised, although this position is controversial.

On mammography, a radial scar appears as a spiculated mass with either a dark or white central area that may or may not have associated microcalcifications (Fig. 4-9). It is a myth that radial scars have dark centers in the mass on mammography (Fig. 4-10) and can be distinguished from breast cancers, which have white-centered masses. Scientific studies have shown that radial scars and breast cancer can both have either white or dark centers on mammograms. This means that all spiculated masses not representing a postbiopsy scar should be sampled histologically (Box 4-9). On ultrasound, a radial scar is a hypoechoic mass, with or without acoustic shadowing.

Solid Masses with Rounded or Expansile Borders (Box 4-10)

Malignant Tumors

Invasive Ductal Cancer

Invasive ductal cancer is the most common round breast cancer (Fig. 4-11). The “round” invasive ductal cancer is an uncommon form of the most common cancer. Invasive ductal cancer represents approximately 90% of all invasive breast cancers. So even though invasive ductal cancers are not often “round,” there are so many invasive ductal cancers that the uncommon round form of the most frequent breast cancer is the most common histologic type (Box 4-11).

The classic invasive ductal cancer is a dense spiculated or irregular mass on mammography. The much less common “round” invasive ductal cancer may grow so rapidly that it does not produce spiculated margins. On screening mammography, round invasive ductal cancer may appear to have a smooth border. However, the borders of the mass may be obscured by surrounding breast tissue, or the standard mammogram may not have the resolution required to reveal abnormal borders. Magnification views may show irregular, microlobulated, or indistinct borders, suggesting invasion of surrounding tissue and the true diagnosis. This is why new round masses on screening mammography are tricky and should be recalled from screening. A new round invasive ductal cancer mimicks benign cysts or fibroadenomas, and the radiologist can mistakenly think the “round” mass is benign until the mass undergoes magnification.

On ultrasound, the round invasive cancer may be smooth-bordered, may show suspicious abnormal findings such as “taller than wide” shape, or may be characterized by a thick echogenic rim. Taller than wide, as described by Stavros and colleagues, means a mass that has invaded through the normal horizontal tissue planes as defined by the thin echogenic Cooper ligaments. Taller means that the cancer grows up toward the skin and violates normal tissue planes rather than growing horizontally between Cooper ligaments (like benign tumors). The “taller than wide” ultrasonographic sign is important in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Medullary Cancer

Medullary cancer is an invasive breast cancer that commonly has a round or pushing border. Medullary cancers occasionally have a surrounding lymphoid infiltrate and have a better prognosis than infiltrating ductal cancer (NOS). They are common in BRCA1-associated carcinomas. Atypical medullary cancers have the same prognosis as infiltrating ductal cancer. On screening mammography, medullary cancer is a high- or equal-density round mass whose margins may appear well circumscribed, suggestive of a cyst or fibroadenoma (Fig. 4-12). On ultrasound, medullary cancers are round, solid, and homogeneous. Because they are homogeneous, medullary cancers occasionally cause posterior acoustic enhancement. Because medullary cancers can simulate a breast cyst by their homogeneous nature and posterior acoustic shadowing, it is important to pay careful attention to technical details during scanning to show that the internal features are hypoechoic rather than anechoic. Color or power Doppler ultrasound may show internal vascularity, unlike an anechoic simple cyst. The pushing expansile growth of medullary cancer may produce well-circumscribed mass borders, similar to fibroadenoma, and is a cause for misdiagnosis. This means that a new round solid mass should be biopsied even if it is well-circumscribed.

Mucinous (Colloid) Carcinoma

This rare, round or oval cancer contains malignant tumor cells that float in mucin within a solid tumor rim. The mucinous portion can have fibrovascular bands segregating the mucinous compartments that comprise the tumor and give it its name. On mammography, mucinous cancers with a large volume of mucin show a well-circumscribed low-density round mass that can suggest a cyst or fibroadenoma and can occasionally have lobulated margins. Mixed type mucinous carcinomas may have poorly defined or spiculated margins. On ultrasound, the tumor mass is round and may be isoechoic to fat, occasionally contains fluid-filled hypoechoic spaces, and may have posterior acoustic enhancement (Fig. 4-13). The mass can simulate a cyst on ultrasound, but unlike the cyst it will not be entirely anechoic. Thus, new round masses on a mammogram that have solid components or do not meet all the specific criteria for a simple cyst on ultrasound should be considered for biopsy.

image image

Figure 4-13 Mucinous cancer. A, A mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammogram shows dense tissue and a metallic scar marker over a previous benign biopsy site; the palpable mass is not seen. B, Ultrasound shows an oval solid heterogeneous mass representing the mucinous cancer. C, Ultrasound of another patient with mucinous cancer shows an oval heterogeneous mass containing fluid-filled spaces. Left MLO (D) and craniocaudal (E) mammograms show an equal-density lobulated mass near the nipple with the marker on it. On ultrasound, a microlobulated heterogeneous mass containing cystic structures is seen on transverse (F) and longitudinal (G) views, worrisome for cancer or a heterogeneous fibroadenoma. Note that the mucinous cancers often contain “cystic” spaces due to the mucin within the tumors. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the axial T1-weighted noncontrast localizer (H) shows a low signal intensity mass against the bright fat near the nipple, corresponding to the mass seen on the mammogram and ultrasound. I, The unenhanced T2-weighted sagittal MRI shows a high signal intensity mass with dark septations within the mass, suggesting either fibroadenoma or mucinous cancer. J, The contrast-enhanced 3-D spectral-spatial excitation magnetization transfer (SSMT) sagittal image shows an irregular round mass with either dark septations or central necrosis. The irregular mass margin and thick irregular internal dark septations suggest cancer instead of fibroadenoma (in fibroadenoma the septations are thinner and regular, and the mass border is usually smooth). Core biopsy showed mucinous cancer.

Intracystic Carcinoma

This extremely rare tumor produces a solid mass in a cyst wall, and the mass looks like a cyst on mammography. Because the tumor is mostly mucin, the mammographic mass is low density unless it has a denser solid component or has bled into the cystic portion to produce a dense mass (Fig. 4-15A). On ultrasound, an intracystic carcinoma is a solid mural mass surrounded by cystic fluid that yields fresh or old blood on aspiration (see Fig. 4-15B). On pneumocystography, the air inside the cyst wall will outline a solid mass along the border of the wall. Intracystic carcinomas must be excised, just as all other cancers are excised. The differential diagnosis for a solid intracystic mass includes intracystic carcinoma, intracystic papilloma, and a cyst with debris adherent to the cyst wall.

Breast Metastasis

Axillary or intramammary lymph node metastasis from breast cancer, lymphoma, or other malignancy makes the normal benign lymph node change its appearance from a well-defined oval or lobular mass with a central radiolucency to a rounder, bigger, and denser mass with loss of the fatty hilum (Fig. 4-16). This results in a round, dense mass. Metastases can occur from breast cancer, lymphoma, leukemia, melanoma, other adenocarcinomas, and even mesothelioma.

Hematologically spread metastases are single or multiple, round, usually circumscribed, and very dense masses in one or both breasts (see Fig. 4-16). The masses vary in size as a result of the various lengths of time that the metastases have had to grow in breast tissue. Typically, the appearance of multiple new solid masses all over the breast in a nonductal pattern is worrisome for hematogenous spread of cancer from a nonbreast site, similar to pulmonary metastases. Melanoma and renal cell carcinoma were reported to metastasize to the breast in this manner. The differential diagnosis of multiple solid breast masses includes multiple fibroadenomas or papillomas, or metastases when there are no old films for comparison.

Benign Tumors

Fibroadenoma

This most common solid benign tumor in young women is thought to arise from the terminal ductal lobular unit via localized hypertrophy. Fibroadenomas can be single or multiple. A fibroadenoma contains structures suggesting breast ductules and also has stromal tissue, which can be quite cellular in young women. Fibroadenomas may also undergo adenosis or hyperplasia and proliferation and may contain fibrous bands or septations. DuPont and colleagues described fibroadenomas containing such proliferation or cysts with the nomenclature complex fibroadenomas. Giant fibroadenomas are 8 cm or larger. Juvenile fibroadenomas occur in adolescents and can grow rapidly, stretch the skin, and become huge. Because juvenile fibroadenomas may grow to such a large size, they may be called giant fibroadenomas, but not all giant fibroadenomas are juvenile fibroadenomas.

On mammograms, the classic fibroadenoma is an oval or lobular equal-density mass with smooth margins. In young patients, fibroadenomas are very cellular. As the fibroadenoma ages, it may become sclerotic and less cellular. Popcorn-like calcifications subsequently develop at the periphery of the mass. Eventually, the entire mass may be replaced by dense calcification and look like a “breast rock.”

On ultrasound, fibroadenomas are oval, well-circumscribed homogeneous masses, usually wider than tall, with up to four gentle lobulations. They are hypoechoic but may occasionally contain cystic spaces. Posterior acoustic enhancement is increased, equal, or shadowing (Fig. 4-17). Fibroadenomas occasionally display irregular borders or heterogeneous internal characteristics, so biopsy is necessary to distinguish these atypical-appearing fibroadenomas from cancer.

image image image

Figure 4-17 A to F, Biopsy-proven fibroadenomas. Magnification craniocaudal (A) and mediolateral oblique (B) views in a young woman show an equal-density, circumscribed oval mass that is hard to see against the dense tissue. Ultrasound shows an oval, lobulated, well-circumscribed homogeneous mass on transverse (C) and longitudinal (D) scans. E, In another patient, the mammogram shows a lobular well-circumscribed mass whose borders are partly obscured. F, Ultrasound shows an oval well-circumscribed homogeneous mass. Another patient has a round equal-density mass on mammogram (G), but on ultrasound (H) the mass is multilobulated and very hypoechoic, similar to cancer. I and J, Ultrasound of another atypical biopsy-proven fibroadenoma shows a taller than wide multilobulated mass with internal speckles. Another atypical palpable biopsy-proven microlobulated fibroadenoma, seen on the mammogram in the lower part of the breast (K) and on ultrasound (L). M and N, Other atypical appearances of biopsy-proven fibroadenoma on ultrasound. O to Q, Ultrasound of a typical fibroadenoma. O, Ultrasound of a palpable mass in a young woman shows a typical well-circumscribed homogeneous mass suggestive of fibroadenoma. P, Doppler ultrasound shows vascularity within the fibroadenoma. Q, Image of the needle during ultrasound-guided core biopsy. Pathology showed fibroadenoma. R to T, Ultrasound of a complex fibroadenoma. Ultrasound of a palpable mass in a young patient shows a well-circumscribed oval solid mass with bright linear septa and a slightly hypoechoic central area in transverse (R) and longitudinal (S) images. The mass has five gentle lobulations on the longitudinal scan and an area of central hypoechogenicity. T, Color Doppler ultrasound shows flow within the mass. Biopsy was done because of the central hypoechogenicity and five lobulations. Biopsy showed fibroadenoma.

Because fibroadenomas contain ductal elements, ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ occurs in fibroadenomas rarely. Any suspicious change in a fibroadenoma should prompt biopsy for this reason.

On MRI, fibroadenomas have the classic appearance of an enhancing oval or lobulated mass with well-circumscribed borders. In 20% they contain dark internal septations. Kinetic data shows a gradual initial enhancement rate and a late persistent enhancement curve. The initial enhancement rate in fibroadenomas can change from slow to rapid, depending on the phase of the woman’s menstrual cycle. In premenopausal women, the initial enhancement changes from slow to rapid, as rapid as cancer, just before menses. But unlike cancer, which shows late plateau or washout curves, the late enhancement curve of a fibroadenoma is persistent. In the week or two after the onset of menses, the initial enhancement curves in fibroadenoma revert back to a gradual initial enhancement curve.

Phyllodes Tumor

Phyllodes tumors used to be called cystosarcoma phyllodes, which is a misnomer because most of these uncommon tumors are benign. Classically, the phyllodes tumor occurs in women in their fifth decade, with a median age of 45 years, and can be quite large, up to 5 cm in size when first detected. In the clinic, most often women with a phyllodes tumor seek advice for a rapidly growing palpable mass. Because the phyllodes tumor can have a biphasic growth pattern, some women report growth of a mass that has been stable for many years. A phyllodes tumor has both stromal and epithelial elements, in contrast to fibroadenoma. The phyllodes tumor also has fluidlike spaces containing solid growth of cellular stroma and epithelium in a leaflike configuration, from which the tumor gets its name. The preferred treatment is wide surgical excision. Incomplete excision of either benign or malignant phyllodes tumors may result in local recurrence in 15% of cases, and they may be excised again and again, only to grow back. About 25% of phyllodes tumors are malignant; 20% of the malignant subtype may metastasize. No distinguishing imaging features can be used to differentiate malignant phyllodes tumors from the more common benign form.

On mammography, a phyllodes tumor is a dense round, oval, or lobulated noncalcified mass with smooth borders. On ultrasound, a phyllodes tumor is a smoothly marginated inhomogeneous mass that occasionally contains cystic spaces producing acoustic posterior enhancement, and it can be mistaken for a fibroadenoma or circumscribed cancer (Fig. 4-18). The goal of imaging is to identify the tumor for wide excision and to search for recurrence in the biopsy bed after surgery when the patient returns for routine follow-up.

Papilloma

Papillomas are either solitary or multiple. In young patients, papillomas are called juvenile papillomas. Solitary papillomas are either central or peripheral, originate in the ductal epithelium, and are often seen in the subareolar region or in subareolar ducts. Tumors starting in the terminal ducts further from the nipple are called peripheral papillomas and are considered a risk factor for breast cancer. Multiple papillomas are usually in a more peripheral location in younger women. Juvenile papillomatosis occurs in young women, but multiple papillomas can also be seen in much older women. Papillomas grow on fibrovascular stalks, which can twist and lead to ischemia, necrosis, and blood extending into the duct. The bleeding papilloma results in the classic symptom of bloody nipple discharge, similar to a symptom of DCIS, causing patients to seek advice. Clinically, papillomas can also cause new, spontaneous clear or serous nipple discharge. Papillomas are usually excised to exclude DCIS or papillary cancer.

On mammography, papillomas are round, well-circumscribed, equal-density masses that occasionally contain calcifications. They are usually located in the subareolar region. In papillomatosis, papillomas can be multiple and peripherally located (Fig. 4-19). Occasionally, papillomas are not seen on mammography or ultrasound at all despite the symptom of bloody or clear nipple discharge. On ultrasound, papillomas are solid round, oval, or microlobulated hypoechoic masses. Small internal cystic spaces are seen occasionally in juvenile papillomatosis. In patients with nipple discharge, ultrasound may show papilloma as a solid mass in a fluid-filled subareolar duct. On galactography, the papilloma produces an intraductal filling defect.

image image image

Figure 4-19 Papillomas. Craniocaudal (CC) (A) and mediolateral (B) magnification views of a galactogram show an irregular microlobulated filling defect from a papilloma. C, A galactogram in another patient shows a papilloma as a smooth filling defect obstructing a dilated duct. D, A mammogram in another patient shows a palpable round irregular mass with calcifications. E, Ultrasound shows a circumscribed oval homogeneous mass. Biopsy revealed intraductal papilloma with apocrine atypia. F, In another patient with nipple discharge and a marker on the nipple, CC spot mammogram shows dilated ducts, a possible mass in the retroareolar region, and scattered benign-appearing calcifications. Ultrasound shows an intraductal mass in a fluid-filled duct in transverse (G) and longitudinal (H) images (arrows). The differential diagnosis includes papilloma, papillary cancer, and ductal carcinoma in situ. Biopsy showed papilloma. I to L, Papilloma on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). I, Noncontrast T1-weighted fat-suppressed sagittal MRI of the mass seen in parts F to H shows high precontrast signal intensity in a dot in the retroareolar region on the right, which may represent debris in the fluid-filled duct. J, Postcontrast 3-D spectral-spatial excitation magnetization transfer (SSMT) sagittal MRI shows an enhancing mass in the retroareolar region. K, Spiral dynamic sagittal MRI with an ROI over the enhancing mass; the corresponding kinetic curve (L) shows that the mass has a rapid initial enhancement curve and washout. The MRI findings are compatible with either invasive ductal cancer or a papilloma. Biopsy showed papilloma.

On MRI, papillomas are round enhancing masses, with a rapid initial rise and a late plateau as washout on kinetic curves, indistinguishable from invasive ductal cancers. Bright T2-weighted signal in ducts on precontrast studies, when seen, represents fluid-filled ducts. If a papilloma is present, the high signal in the duct may obscure an enhancing papilloma within it.

The finding of a round solid mass suspected to be papilloma requires a histologic diagnosis. Follow-up for papillomas diagnosed by core biopsy is controversial. However, surgical excisional biopsy is universally advised for papillomas with papillary carcinoma, atypia, or nonconcordant imaging findings. Surgical excisional biopsy for papillomas without atypia or malignancy diagnosed by core biopsy is variable, but many investigators recommend excision.

Solid Masses with Indistinct Margins (Box 4-13)

Lymphoma

Lymphoma can involve breast lymph nodes or can occur as a primary or secondary site in the breast parenchyma. Lymphadenopathy is the most common appearance of lymphoma involving the breast and is seen on the mammogram as large dense lymph nodes in the axilla that have lost their fatty hila and become bigger and rounder (Fig. 4-22A). Primary or secondary breast lymphoma is usually caused by non-Hodgkin lymphomatous infiltration into breast tissue and not into a lymph node. It is a rare cause of an ill-defined mass that looks just like invasive ductal cancer on mammography (see Fig. 4-22B to F). The borders of the mass are indistinct because of lymphomatous infiltration into the surrounding glandular tissue, but it can occasionally be well-circumscribed or lobulated. On ultrasound, primary or secondary breast lymphomas in the breast tissue appear as hypoechoic masses.

Without a diagnosis of lymphoma elsewhere in the body, the diagnosis of primary breast lymphoma is often unsuspected until percutaneous biopsy is performed on the breast mass prompting the investigation. Primary breast lymphoma is treated by chemotherapy and radiation therapy, not by surgical excisional biopsy, thus distinguishing its treatment from that of breast cancer. If a patient has a primary diagnosis of lymphoma elsewhere in the body and presents with a new ill-defined breast mass, the first and foremost diagnosis for the breast mass should be primary breast cancer, with a secondary but important differential diagnosis of breast lymphoma. Because breast cancer and lymphoma of the breast are treated differently, fine-needle or core biopsy should be done to establish a diagnosis and determine patient management.

Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia

Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) is a rare benign cause of a growing ill-defined noncalcified round or oval mass. It occurs in premenopausal women or in postmenopausal women receiving exogenous hormone therapy (Fig. 4-23). Occasionally, the mass may be well-circumscribed. This entity is of unknown etiology and is composed of stromal and epithelial proliferation; it occasionally shows rapid growth on mammography and requires biopsy. On ultrasound, PASH is a mixed or hypoechoic mass with ill-defined borders in 62%, as reported by Wieman and colleagues. It is thought that there is a hormonal influence on its development, and PASH is more often seen in premenopausal women or postmenopausal women receiving hormone therapy. Fine-needle aspiration can be inconclusive, as can core needle biopsy. Because low-grade angiosarcoma can mimic PASH on core biopsy, excisional biopsy is recommended if the mass grows.

Masses Containing Fat (Box 4-14)

Lymph Nodes

The lymph nodes are typically seen in the axilla. They are round or oval and contain a radiolucent fatty center. Benign lymph nodes may be of any size, have a smooth solid cortex, and contain a fatty hilum (Fig. 4-24). An intramammary lymph node has the same appearance as lymph nodes in the axilla; it is often located in the upper outer quadrant of the breast along blood vessels and should not be mistaken for a malignancy. In questionable cases, spot magnification views demonstrate a well-circumscribed oval or lobulated mass and, importantly, its fatty hilum. On breast ultrasound, the lymph node is hypoechoic and bean-shaped and contains a fatty center. On color Doppler ultrasound, the lymph node hilum or fatty center will contain a pulsating blood vessel (see Fig. 4-24D). On MRI, the lymph node kinetics show rapid initial enhancement with late washout, similar to cancer, due to its central blood vessel. However, its typical appearance on MRI, which shows a solid mass with the fatty hilum and high signal on T2-weighted images, should distinguish it from cancer, which has no fatty hilum and commonly has low signal on T2-weighted images.

Hamartoma

This entity, also known as a fibroadenolipoma, is a benign mass that contains fat and other elements found in the breast. On physical examination, a hamartoma may not be felt distinctly if it contains mostly fat and glandular tissue. The classic appearance is that of an oval mass containing fat and fibroglandular tissue with a thin capsule or rim, the “breast within a breast” appearance (Fig. 4-25). Breast hamartomas have a variable appearance, depending on the amount of fat and stromal elements that they contain. On occasion, a hamartoma may have mostly stromal and glandular elements and appear as a dense mass rather than one containing mostly fat and glandular elements (Fig. 4-26). Because cancer can develop in breast elements and ducts, cancer can develop in hamartomas. Biopsy should be performed on hamartomas if suspicious microcalcifications are developing within it. Otherwise, a classic “breast within a breast” hamartoma is benign and should be left alone.

Fluid-Containing Masses (Box 4-15)

Cyst

A simple cyst occurs in 10% of all women and is frequently seen in women receiving exogenous hormone replacement therapy. Caused by obstruction and dilatation of the terminal ducts with fluid trapped within them, a cyst can enlarge with the patient’s menstrual cycle and decrease after the onset of menses. Cysts may be asymptomatic or may become painful and produce a palpable lump. They may be single or multiple, and they can regress or grow spontaneously and rapidly.

Because cysts often produce a palpable mass, they are a frequent cause of symptoms for which patients seek advice. On mammography, cysts are round or oval, well-circumscribed, and are low-density or equal in density to fibroglandular tissue. Spot compression magnification will show an equal-density or low-density mass with a sharply marginated border where they are not obscured by adjacent dense glandular tissue.

Breast ultrasound shows an anechoic mass with imperceptible walls, a sharp back wall, and enhanced posterior transmission of sound (Fig. 4-29). Cysts may have internal echoes as a result of debris. Cysts may be left alone (Box 4-16) or can be aspirated by palpation or under ultrasound guidance if symptomatic, but they have no malignant potential. If a cyst is causing a palpable mass, the palpable finding should resolve after cyst aspiration. On MRI cysts have a high T2-weighted signal and show no enhancement. Occasionally inflamed cysts show rim enhancement and can be a cause of a false-positive MRI. However, the bright T2-weighted signal, no enhancement after contrast injection, and a thin rim should differentiate the inflamed cyst from cancer.

Abscess

A breast abscess occurs after mastitis. Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus is the usual pathogen in abscess. In a nursing mother, the infection develops as a result of bacterial entry through a cracked nipple. In teenagers, infection may occur during sexual contact. In older women, those who are diabetic or immunocompromised are especially at risk for mastitis and abscess. Typically, an abscess is a painful hard mass that is tender to touch, with overlying red, edematous skin and surrounding cellulitis.

On mammography, an abscess is usually subareolar, appears as a dense or equal-density noncalcified irregular mass with focal or diffuse skin thickening, and may be obscured by surrounding breast edema.

On ultrasound, an abscess is an irregular fluid-filled mass occasionally containing debris or septations (Fig. 4-31). The surrounding edema blurs the normal adjacent breast structures, makes the adjacent fat gray, and causes skin thickening. A breast abscess usually does not contain air. Bright echoes or specular reflectors may represent air in the abscess after attempted drainage.

Treatment involves antibiotic therapy and drainage of the abscess by either percutaneous or surgical methods. Surgery usually involves incision and debridement, leaving the abscess cavity open to heal by granulomatous formation by second intention. Percutaneous needle aspiration without catheter placement is usually unsuccessful as the only method of drainage if the abscess is large (>2.4 to 3 cm) or septated, or if incompletely drained pockets are left in the surrounding breast tissue. In these cases, percutaneous needle drainage without an indwelling catheter may be palliative. Women with a chronic subareolar abscess caused by chronic duct obstruction are in a special category and require duct excision as well as abscess treatment. The chronic subareolar abscess may have an adjacent skin fistula. The abscess requires excision of the fistula as well as incision and debridement of the abscess.

Sebaceous and Epidermal Inclusion Cysts

Sebaceous cysts are not cysts at all, but result from keratin accumulation in plugged ducts. Sebaceous cysts have an epithelial cell lining from the sebaceous gland, whereas epidermal cysts have a true epidermal cell lining and no sebaceous glands. Because they have almost no malignant potential, biopsy is not required unless the patient desires removal.

Clinically, sebaceous cysts can produce a palpable mass, a “blackhead” that when squeezed will yield cheesy yellow or white material. On mammography, sebaceous and epidermal inclusion cysts are identical, with subcutaneous oval or round well-defined masses that are often overexposed because of their location near the skin surface; they occasionally contain calcifications (Fig. 4-32A to C). Ultrasound shows an oval, well-circumscribed, hypoechoic or anechoic mass in a subcutaneous location with a little tail extending into the skin, representing the dilated hair follicle (see Fig. 4-32D to F).

Displacement of epidermal fragments from the skin surface to locations deep within the breast parenchyma cause epidermal inclusion cysts after percutaneous biopsy or surgery. The epidermal inclusion cyst produces a round or oval mass located within breast tissue far away from the skin surface. Because epidermal inclusion cysts have an epithelial lining, they can produce a growing mass on the mammogram as a result of accumulating inspissated material within them. Because they cause a growing solid mass, the epidermal inclusion cyst often requires biopsy to exclude cancer.

Galactocele

Typically seen in lactating women, a galactocele represents a focal collection of breast milk that occasionally causes a palpable mass. On mammography, a galactocele is a low- or equal-density, oval or round, well-circumscribed mass (Fig. 4-33A and C), but it can be of higher density, depending on resorption of its fluid contents and the residual solid component. On an upright mammogram, a classic, but rarely seen finding of a fat/fluid level in the mass represents fat rising to the top of the galactocele while the other milk components layer dependently below. On ultrasound, a galactocele may look like a well-defined hypoechoic cystlike mass. Galactoceles containing more solid elements simulate a solid mass that occasionally displays posterior acoustic shadowing (see Fig. 4-33B and D). On aspiration, milky fluid will be obtained. Atypical galactoceles with a round or irregular shape, nonparallel orientation, indistinct or microlobulated noncircumscribed margin, but with a relatively sharp convex anterior or posterior echogenic rim, requiring biopsy, have been reported by Kim and colleagues.

Key Elements

A mass is a three-dimensional object seen on at least two mammographic projections.

On mammography, the mass repeat includes a description of the shape, margins, density, location, the mass’s associated findings, and how it has changed if previously present.

Mass shapes are round, oval, lobular, and irregular, with the probability of cancer increasing with increasing irregularity of the shape.

Mass margins are circumscribed, microlobulated, obscured, indistinct, or spiculated, with the probability of cancer increasing with increasing spiculation of the margin.

Fat-containing masses are almost never malignant.

Mass density is lower, equal to, or higher than an equal amount of fibroglandular tissue. High-density masses are suspicious for cancer.

The differential diagnosis for spiculated masses includes invasive ductal cancer, invasive lobular cancer, tubular cancer, postbiopsy scar, radial scar, fat necrosis, and sclerosing adenosis.

To determine whether a spiculated mass represents a postbiopsy scar, correlate the postbiopsy mammogram with the prebiopsy study showing where the finding was removed.

Spiculated masses that do not represent postbiopsy scars should undergo biopsy to exclude cancer.

Radial scars cannot be distinguished from spiculated breast cancer on mammography.

Invasive lobular cancer accounts for approximately 10% of all cancers but is one of the hardest to see on mammography because of its single-file cellular growth pattern.

The differential diagnosis for solid masses with round or expansile borders includes fibroadenoma, cancer, phyllodes tumor, papilloma, lactating adenoma, tubular adenoma, metastases, sebaceous cyst, and epidermal inclusion cyst.

The most common round cancer is invasive ductal cancer, an uncommon form of the most common breast cancer.

Medullary and mucinous breast cancers are commonly round in shape, but they are much rarer than invasive ductal cancer.

Fat-containing masses include lymph nodes, hamartoma, oil cyst, lipoma, and the rare liposarcoma.

Normal lymph nodes are oval, have an echogenic fatty hilum, and may contain a central pulsating blood vessel on color or power Doppler ultrasound in the fatty hilum.

Abnormal lymph nodes lose their fatty hilum and become larger and rounder than previously.

Fluid-containing masses include cysts, hematoma/seroma, necrotic cancer, intracystic carcinoma, intracystic papilloma, abscess, and galactocele.

Hamartomas look like a “breast within a breast” and should be left alone.

Galactoceles may rarely show a fat/fluid level on upright mammographic views.

Know the typical appearance of “don’t touch” benign lymph nodes, hamartomas, oil cysts, lipomas, galactoceles, cysts, and postbiopsy scars.

Suggested Readings

Adler DD, Helvie MA, Oberman HA, et al. Radial sclerosing lesion of the breast: mammographic features. Radiology. 1990;176:737-740.

Adler DD, Hyde DL, Ikeda DM. Quantitative sonographic parameters as a means of distinguishing breast cancers from benign solid breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10:505-508.

American College of Radiology. Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®), ed 3. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1998.

Baker JA, Soo MS. Breast US: assessment of technical quality and image interpretation. Radiology. 2002;223:229-238.

Baker TP, Lenert JT, Parker J, et al. Lactating adenoma: a diagnosis of exclusion. Breast J. 2001;7:354-735.

Bilgen IG, Ustun EE, Memis A. Fat necrosis of the breast: clinical, mammographic and sonographic features. Eur J Radiol. 2001;39:92-99.

Brem RF, Ioffe M, Rapelyea JA, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:379-383.

Brookes MJ, Bourke AG. Radiological appearances of papillary breast lesions. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:1265-1273.

Cardenosa G, Doudna C, Eklund GW. Mucinous (colloid) breast cancer: clinical and mammographic findings in 10 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:1077-1079.

Castro CY, Whitman GJ, Sahin AA. Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of the breast. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25:213-216.

Cawson JN, Law EM, Kavanagh AM. Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic features of cancers detected in a BreastScreen Program. Australas Radiol. 2001;45:25-30.

Chao TC, Lo YF, Chen SC, Chen MF. Sonographic features of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:64-71.

Chapellier C, Balu-Maestro C, Bleuse A, et al. Ultrasonography of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: sonographic patterns and diagnostic value: report of 102 cases. Clin Imaging. 2000;24:333-336.

Cheung YC, Wan YL, Chen SC, et al. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;30:323-331.

Chopra S, Evans AJ, Pinder SE, et al. Pure mucinous breast cancer—mammographic and ultrasound findings. Clin Radiol. 1996;51:421-424.

Cohen MA, Morris EA, Rosen PP, et al. Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: mammographic, sonographic, and clinical patterns. Radiology. 1996;198:117-120.

Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, Goldberg BB. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonomammography correlated with pathology in 122 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140:369-375.

Conant EF, Dillon RL, Palazzo J, et al. Imaging findings in mucin-containing carcinomas of the breast: correlation with pathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:821-824.

Darling ML, Smith DN, Rhei E, et al. Lactating adenoma: sonographic features. Breast J. 2000;6:252-256.

Denison CM, Ward VL, Lester SC, et al. Epidermal inclusion cysts of the breast: three lesions with calcifications. Radiology. 1997;204:493-496.

Domchek SM, Hecht JL, Fleming MD, et al. Lymphomas of the breast: primary and secondary involvement. Cancer. 2002;94:6-13.

Doyle EM, Banville N, Quinn CM, et al. Radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions and malignancy in a screening programme: incidence and histological features revisited. Histopathology. 2007;50:607-614.

Dupont WD, Page DL, Pari FF, et al. Long-term risk of breast cancer in women with fibroadenoma. N Engl J Med. 1994;351(1):10-15.

Eisinger F, Nogues C, Birnbaum D, et al. BRCA1 and medullary breast cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:1227-1228.

Elson BC, Helvie MA, Frank TS, et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mode of presentation, mammographic appearance, and frequency of nodal metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:1173-1176.

Elson BC, Ikeda DM, Andersson I, Wattsgard C. Fibrosarcoma of the breast: mammographic findings in five cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:993-995.

Estabrook A, Asch T, Gump F, et al. Mammographic features of intracystic papillary lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170:113-116.

Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology. 1989;172:671-675.

Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer. 1995;76:626-630.

Gunhan-Bilgen I, Memis A, Ustun EE. Metastatic intramammary lymph nodes: mammographic and ultrasonographic features. Eur J Radiol. 2001;40:24-29.

Gunhan-Bilgen I, Zekioglu O, Ustun EE, et al. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic, and sonographic findings with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:927-931.

Harnist KS, Ikeda DM, Helvie MA. Abnormal mammogram after steering wheel injury. West J Med. 1993;159:504-506.

Harvey JA, Moran RE, Maurer EJ, DeAngelis GA. Sonographic features of mammary oil cysts. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16:719-724.

Hashimoto BE, Kramer DJ, Picozzi VJ. High detection rate of breast ductal carcinoma in situ calcifications on mammographically directed high-resolution sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:501-508.

Hilton SV, Leopold GR, Olson LK, Willson SA. Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:479-486.

Homer MJ. Proper placement of a metallic marker on an area of concern in the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:390-391.

Jorge Blanco A, Vargas Serrano B, Rodriguez Romero R, Martinez Cendejas E. Phyllodes tumors of the breast. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:356-360.

Kim MJ, Kim EK, Park SY, et al. Galactoceles mimicking suspicious solid masses on sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:145-151.

Lee CH, Giurescu ME, Philpotts LE, et al. Clinical importance of unilaterally enlarging lymph nodes on otherwise normal mammograms. Radiology. 1997;203:329-334.

Levrini G, Mori CA, Vacondio R, et al. MRI patterns of invasive lobular cancer: T1 and T2 features. Radiol Med. 2008;113:1110-1125.

Lindfors KK, Kopans DB, Googe PB, et al. Breast cancer metastasis to intramammary lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:133-136.

Memis A, Ozdemir N, Parildar M, et al. Mucinous (colloid) breast cancer: mammographic and US features with histologic correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2000;35:39-43.

Meyer JE, Amin E, Lindfors KK, et al. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and US appearance. Radiology. 1989;170:79-82.

Ohlinger R, Frese H, Schwesinger G, et al. Papillary intracystic carcinoma of the female breast—role of ultrasonography. Ultraschall Med. 2005;26:325-328.

Paramagul CP, Helvie MA, Adler DD. Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic appearance and role of sonography in improving diagnostic sensitivity. Radiology. 1995;195:231-234.

Ribeiro-Silva A, Mendes CF, Costa IS, et al. Metastases to the breast from extramammary malignancies: a clinicopathologic study of 12 cases. Pol J Pathol. 2006;57:161-165.

Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Rodriguez-Gil Y, Moreno-Bueno G, et al. Sporadic invasive breast carcinomas with medullary features display a basal-like phenotype: an immunohistochemical and gene amplification study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:501-508.

Rosen EL, Soo MS, Bentley RC. Focal fibrosis: a common breast lesion diagnosed at imaging-guided core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1657-1662.

Salvador R, Salvador M, Jimenez JA, et al. Galactocele of the breast: radiologic and ultrasonographic findings. Br J Radiol. 1990;63:140-142.

Samardar P, de Paredes ES, Grimes MM, Wilson JD. Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2002;22:19-33.

Schneider JA. Invasive papillary breast carcinoma: mammographic and sonographic appearance. Radiology. 1989;171:377-379.

Schrading S, Kuhl CK. Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer. Radiology. 2008;246:58-70.

Sheppard DG, Whitman GJ, Huynh PT, et al. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:253-257.

Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:661-663.

Sickles E. Practical solutions to common mammographic problems: tailoring the examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:31-39.

Sickles EA, Herzog KA. Intramammary scar tissue: a mimic of the mammographic appearance of carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;135:349-352.

Soo MS, Dash N, Bentley R, et al. Tubular adenomas of the breast: imaging findings with histologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:757-761.

Sperber F, Blank A, Metser U. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and pathological correlation. Breast J. 2002;8:53-54.

Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196:123-134.

Sumkin JH, Perrone AM, Harris KM, et al. Lactating adenoma: US features and literature review. Radiology. 1998;206:271-274.

Tabar L, Pentek Z, Dean PB. The diagnostic and therapeutic value of breast cyst puncture and pneumocystography. Radiology. 1981;141:659-663.

Venta LA, Wiley EL, Gabriel H, Adler YT. Imaging features of focal breast fibrosis: mammographic-pathologic correlation of noncalcified breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:309-316.

Vo T, Xing Y, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with mucinous, medullary, tubular, and invasive ductal carcinomas after lumpectomy. Am J Surg. 2007;194:527-531.

Wahner-Roedler DL, Sebo TJ, Gisvold JJ. Hamartomas of the breast: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic manifestations. Breast J. 2001;7:101-105.

Walsh R, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, et al. Axillary lymph nodes: mammographic, pathologic, and clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:33-38.

Weigel RJ, Ikeda DM, Nowels KW. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. South Med J. 1996;89:511-515.

Wieman SM, Landercasper J, Johnson JM, et al. Tumoral pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of the breast. Am Surg. 2008;74:1211-1214.

Woods ER, Helvie MA, Ikeda DM, et al. Solitary breast papilloma: comparison of mammographic, galactographic, and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:487-491.

Quizzes

4-1. Name the differential diagnosis for fat-containing masses.

For answers, see Box 4-14.

4-2. Name the differential diagnosis for fluid-containing masses.

For answers, see Box 4-15.

4-3. Name “don’t touch” benign masses that should be left alone.

For answers, see Box 4-16.

4-4. Name ultrasound features of solid breast masses.

MALIGNANT BENIGN
1. ________________ 1. __________________
2. ________________ 2. __________________
3. ________________ 3. __________________
4. ________________ 4. __________________
5. ________________  
6. ________________  
7. ________________  
8. ________________  

For answers, see Box 4-3.

4-5. Name the differential diagnosis for spiculated masses.

For answers, see Box 4-6.

4-6. Name the elements of ultrasound image labeling.

For answers, see Box 4-4.

4-7. Name the differential diagnosis for round masses.

For answers, see Box 4-10.

4-8. Name the differential diagnosis for multiple round masses.

For answers, see Box 4-12.

4-9. Name the differential diagnosis for solid indistinct masses.

For answers, see Box 4-13.