Malignant melanoma

Published on 05/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Dermatology

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 1519 times

Chapter 45 Malignant melanoma

2. How common is malignant melanoma in the United States?

In terms of incidence, melanoma is the most rapidly increasing form of cancer in the United States. Its incidence has increased more than 15-fold over the past 40 years. In 2005, the age-adjusted incidence was 24.6 per 100,000 for men and 15.6 per 100,000 for women. More than 59,000 cases of invasive melanoma and approximately 46,000 new cases of melanoma in situ were diagnosed in the United States in 2005. Malignant melanoma is the fifth and sixth most common form of cancer in men and women, respectively. It is now the most common cancer in young women aged 25 to 29 years. The lifetime risk of developing melanoma has increased from 1 in 1500 for someone born in the early 1900s to 1 in 100 for people born in 1990 to an estimated 1 in 41 to 61 for persons born in the year 2007. Incidence rates differ between genders, ages, ethnic groups, and regions. In this regard, before the age of 40, the incidence of melanoma is higher in young women; subsequently the incidence of melanoma increases rapidly in men, but the rate of increase slows in women.

The mortality rates for melanoma have also continued to increase, although not as greatly as incidence rates. From 1975 to 1990, the mortality rates for women and men increased by 1.6% and 2.2%, respectively. In contrast to women, mortality rates continue to increase in men. In this regard, men older than 65 years have the greatest risk of dying from their disease.

The discrepancy between the rates of increase of incidence and mortality in melanoma has been attributed to improved early detection and the diagnosis of thinner lesions. However, there has been a concurrent increase in thicker, more advanced melanoma lesions, suggesting a true increase in biologically aggressive disease. This issue is likely not going to be resolved until there are better prognostic markers for malignant melanoma.

DevCan: Probability of developing or dying of cancer software, version 6.2.1, Statistical Research and Applications Branch, NCI, 2007. Available at: http://srab.cancer.gov/devcan. Accessed July 28, 2010.

Rager EL, Bridgeford EP, Ollila DW: Cutaneous melanoma: update on prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment, Am Fam Physician 15:269–276, 2005.

Tucker MA: Melanoma epidemiology, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 23:383–395, 2009.

7. Do all melanomas develop from atypical nevi?

In the past, the development of melanoma has been modeled as a stepwise process from a cutaneous melanocyte through nevus through atypical nevus stages to melanoma in situ and eventually invasive melanoma. However, around 40% to 75% of melanomas develop in normal skin de novo, and, of those melanomas that develop in association with a preexisting nevus, <50% of the nevi are atypical. At present it is difficult to determine whether an atypical nevus is any more likely to become a melanoma than any other nevus or isolated melanocyte. Moreover, it is now clear that a preexisting nevus is not required for a melanoma to develop. It is thought that the discrepancy between melanomas arising in preexisting nevi and de novo melanomas can best be explained by the cancer stem cell theory. In this regard, the risk of melanoma associated with nevi may be due to the potential for secondary mutations within nevi, as well as due to the inherent properties of the stem cell population in individuals with numerous moles. Therefore, although there is a clear association between nevi and melanoma risk, only a portion of this risk may be related to the acquisition of genetic mutations within the nevi. The majority of the risk may be associated with the inherent properties of melanocyte stem cell populations in individuals with numerous nevi.

Friedman RJ, Farber MJ, Warycha MA, et al: The “dysplastic” nevus. Clin Dermatol 27:103–115, 2009.

Elder, DE: Dysplastic nevi: an update, Histopathology 56:112–120, 2010.

8. What are cancer stem cells?

10. What are the molecular pathways in melanoma?

Major molecular pathways that have been implicated in melanoma include p16 (25% to 50%) and p14ARF (25% to 50%), microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) (50% to 75%), B-Raf (50% to 60%), and PTEN (15% to 25%). Furthermore, the antiapoptotic factor Bcl-2 is often overexpressed in melanoma. It should be stressed, that as noted above, not all melanomas are the same. In this regard, those melanomas that develop in younger patients on intermittently sun-exposed skin demonstrate a greater percentage of B-Raf mutations (>60%) than those melanomas that develop on chronically sun-exposed skin in older patients (<15%). In contrast, those melanomas that develop on chronically sun-exposed skin in older patients demonstrate a greater percentage of N-Ras mutations (20% to 40%). Along the same lines, melanomas that develop on acral and mucosal sites more demonstrate a greater percentage of c-Kit mutations (∼40%) compared to non–sun-exposed (0%) and sun-exposed (30%) melanomas. Further, acral and mucosal melanomas demonstrate a lower percentage of B-Raf mutations (∼20% and ∼10%, respectively).

Bauer J, Bastian B: Genomic analysis of melanocytic neoplasia, Adv Dermatol 21:81–99, 2005.

Fecher LA, Cummings SD, Keefe MJ, Alani RM: Toward a molecular classification of melanoma, J Clin Oncol 25:1606–1620, 2007.

Mocellin S, Verdi D, Nitti D: DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Carcinogenesis 30:1735–1743, 2009.

Curtlin JA, Busam K, Pinkel D, Bastian BC: Somatic activation of KIT in distinct subtypes of melanoma, J Clin Oncol 24:4340–4346, 2006.

Miller AJ, Mihm MC: Melanoma, N Engl J Med 355:51–65, 2006.

Dhomen N, Marais R: BRAF signaling and targeted therapies in melanoma, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 23:529–545, 2009.

13. What are the ABCDEs of melanoma?

The development of a new or changing pigmented lesion is the classic initial presentation of melanoma. A lesion that demonstrates a noticeable increase in size over a period of weeks to months or development of pigment irregularity (black, hues of brown, red, blue, or white) should be evaluated by a physician and biopsied. The ABCDEs of melanoma (Fig. 45-1) are a helpful guideline for determining which moles could be suspicious for melanoma:

16. Are there different types of melanoma?

There are several different types of melanoma, and each may appear somewhat differently:

Acral lentiginous melanoma represents 5% to 10% of all cases of melanoma. It is the most common form of melanoma in African-Americans, Asians, and Hispanics (Fig. 45-2C). The latter does not reflect an increase incidence of acral lentiginous melanoma in these races. It usually appears as brown or black macules arising on the glabrous (non–hair-bearing) skin of an extremity (palms, soles, or nail beds). It can also occur on mucosal surfaces. The latter have an extremely poor prognosis.

24. How is melanoma treated?

The standard of care for treating melanoma is to:

25. How wide should surgical margins be?

There is ongoing controversy regarding the width of normal-appearing skin that should be excised. At one time, 5.0-cm margins were recommended. With the exception of only four prospective multicenter trials, surgical margins were originally based, at least in part, on consensus decision and tradition. A National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference on Melanoma has recommended surgical margins based on the depth of invasion of the primary tumor. Malignant melanoma in situ should be excised with a 0.5-cm border of normal skin. Lesions that have a Breslow’s depth of 1.0 mm should have wide local reexcision with 1.0-cm margins. Lesions that are 1 to 2 mm thick should be excised with 1- to 2-cm margins (2 cm, if primary closure can be achieved, or no significant difference exists in reconstruction between a 1- and 2-cm margin of excision). Lesions that are intermediate, 2 to 4 mm thick, are excised with 2-cm margins. Lesions 4.0 mm thick should be excised with 2- to 3-cm margins; there are no randomized trials that have determined the optimal margins for excision of melanoma > 4 mm in thickness. These recommendations are meant only as general guidelines, and individual patient considerations must be taken into account. It should be stressed that there are several studies demonstrating that 0.5-cm margins are inadequate for most malignant melanoma in situ on the head, neck, hands, and feet. Moreover, there is evidence to suggest that tumor thickness should not influence surgical margins.

Studies suggest that definitive surgical treatment may be delayed up to 3 weeks after biopsy of the primary lesion without adversely affecting the 5-year survival rate.

Landthaler M, Braun-Falco O, Leitl A, et al: Excisional biopsy as the first therapeutic procedure versus primary wide excision of malignant melanoma, Cancer 64:1612–1616, 1989.

Zitelli JA: Surgical margins for lentigo maligna, Arch Dermatol 2004 140:607–608, 2004.

Bricca GM, Brodland DG, Ren D, Zitelli JA: Cutaneous head and neck melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery, J Am Acad Dermatol 52:92–100, 2005.

Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Uren RF: Surgical management of primary cutaneous melanoma: excision margins and the role of sentinel lymph node examination, Surg Oncol Clin N Am 15:301–318, 2006.

28. Describe the recommended follow-up for a patient with melanoma.

Routine follow-up evaluations vary, depending on the depth of the primary tumor (Table 45-2). It is important to stress that unlike many malignancies, melanoma has a tendency to recur many years after the primary tumor is removed. Therefore, patients at high risk for recurrence need to be followed very closely for long periods of time.

29. Which tests or examinations are conducted during the routine follow-up of patients who have had melanoma?

31. What is elective lymph node dissection (ELND)? When is it indicated?

32. What is sentinel lymph node biopsy? When is it indicated?

In 1990, Morton introduced intraoperative lymphatic mapping and selective lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as an alternative to ELND for melanoma patients. He showed that the histology of the SLN reflects the histology of the entire lymph node basin, because when it is negative, the other lymph nodes within that basin are almost always also negative. The initial data from large series show substantial differences in the survival curves of patients, depending on their SLN status, and, in multivariate analysis, the status of the SLN has been confirmed as the most important prognostic factor for patients with primary melanoma.

SLNB are now being performed in clinical practice in many centers in the United States and abroad. The status of the SLN often guides further therapeutic interventions including complete lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Nevertheless, like ELND the theoretical value of SLNB dissection is based on the notion that melanoma cells migrate in an orderly fashion toward the draining lymph node.

To date there is little evidence that early dissection in SLN positive patients improves their survival compared to patients who receive nodal dissection when clinically detectable nodes develop. SLN remains a very controversial topic, and several points need to be emphasized. First, there is little evidence to suggest that melanoma cells migrate in an orderly fashion toward the draining lymph node, and the presence of melanoma cells within a lymph node may merely be an indicator of systemic metastatic disease. Second, surgical alteration of a patient’s regional lymphatic structure may impair the body’s immune response to melanoma. Third, at present we are unable to determine what constitutes relevant nodal disease. In this regard, 60% of patients with primary melanoma <1.0 mm in depth demonstrate positive SLN through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. These patients have a very favorable survival rate and rarely go on to develop nodal disease. Therefore, the presence of microscopic metastases does not correlate with the clinical course. Fourth, SLN biopsies require close collaboration between the nuclear radiologist, surgeon, and pathologist. Patient selection is also paramount. This procedure is less reliable if a wide excision has been performed; therefore, patients considered candidates should be referred for this procedure prior to the wide excision, which can be carried out simultaneously with the SLNB. Fifth, lymphatic flow is markedly varied in different persons, and it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty which nodal basin serves a particular area of skin. Lastly, proponents of SLNB argue that SLN may identify patients who may be candidates for adjuvant therapy (see below). Nevertheless, to date no effective adjuvant therapy exists for metastatic melanoma.

Despite the controversies surrounding SNL, the AJCC recommends that all patients with primary melanoma >1 mm in tumor thickness have SNL biopsy performed prior to entry into melanoma clinical trials.

Amersi F, Morton DL: The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma, Adv Surg 41:241–256, 2007.

Medalie NS, Ackerman AB: Sentinel lymph node biopsy has no benefit for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma metastatic to a lymph node: an assertion based on comprehensive, critical analysis: part I, Am J Dermatopathol 25:399–417, 2003.

Medalie NS, Ackerman AB: Sentinel lymph node biopsy has no benefit for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma metastatic to a lymph node: an assertion based on comprehensive, critical analysis: part II, Am J Dermatopathol 25:473–484, 2003.

Zitelli JA: Sentinel lymph node biopsy: an alternate view, Dermatol Surg 34:544–549, 2008.

33. What is linear melanonychia?

A linear, pigmented streak of the nail (Fig. 45-3). Among the many potential causes, subungual melanoma is the most serious. A biopsy of the nail matrix is required if melanonychia develops rapidly, if it involves only a single digit, or if other causes of the abnormal pigmentation cannot be determined. This is a more common presentation of melanoma in blacks than in whites.

Note that longitudinal pigmented nail bands are commonly seen in darkly pigmented patients but are less common in light-skinned patients. If a pigmented nail band involves only one nail, occurs in a middle-aged or elderly white patient, shows progressive widening or darkening, or has an extension of pigment onto the surrounding nail fold, a biopsy is indicated to rule out melanoma.

39. How effective is immunotherapy in malignant melanoma?

The lack of effective treatment for advanced-stage melanoma by conventional therapies, such as radiation and chemotherapy, has highlighted the need to develop alternative therapeutic strategies. Among them, immunotherapy has attracted much attention because immunologic events appear to play a role in the clinical course of the disease and may occasionally cause clinical regressions.

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy has been investigated using a variety of nonconjugated and conjugated (linked to toxins or radioisotopes) mAb directed against glycolipids, glycoproteins, and proteoglycans expressed by melanoma cells. Occasional dramatic responses have been reported, but the overall efficacy is quite limited, and responses have been noted only in about 10% to 12% of treated patients. More recent studies have investigated the use of mAb that targets immunomodulatory pathways that regulate immune effector cells. In this regard, considerable attention has been given toward targeting either CD28 or CTLA-4 on immune effector cells. It should be stressed that targeting the CD28/CTLA-4 pathway is fraught with hazard, because affinity and concentration of the administrated mAb must be balanced to prevent superinflammatory responses. The CTLA-4–specific ipilimumab (MDX-010) and tremelimumab (CP-675,206), which are fully human IgG1 and IgG2 mAbs, respectively, are being tested in patients with metastatic melanoma. The use of tremelimumab is also currently being investigated in a phase I trial in stage IV melanoma patients in combination with the Toll-like receptor (TLR)9 agonist PF-3512676.

A number of new mAbs are directed against various targets, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis family costimulatory receptors (e.g., DR4, DR5, glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor [GITR], CD134 [OX40], CD137 [4-1BB], and CD40), and integrins also are currently being investigated in clinical trials.

Recently, T-cell–based immunotherapy has been emphasized, because there have been disappointing results in the clinical trials implemented with mAbs, and because T cells are believed to play the major role in the control of tumor growth. In general, these vaccines have been relatively successful in animals; however, these results have not translated into human trials. These studies have demonstrated that cell-based, heat shock protein–based, T-cell–defined peptide epitopes and dendritic cell–based vaccinations can effectively induce tumor-specific immune responses. Nonetheless, a lack of clinical response and/or recurrence of disease occurs frequently, in spite of induction and/or persistence of TA-specific immune responses. This lack of correlation is caused, at least in part, by the multiple immune escape mechanisms utilized by melanoma cells.

An additional means of cellular immunotherapy is the adoptive transfer of immune effector cells into patients. The ex vivo expansion of lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), with or without interleukin-2 (IL-2), has achieved some remarkable response rates in cancer patients.

The use of biologic response modifiers, such as interferon (IFN) and other cytokines, has had modest success. The use of IFN-α as a single-agent treatment has yielded response rates of 15% to 20% and complete response rates in up to 5% of patients. However, it should be stressed that the use of IFN-α remains controversial because its use has only been associated with an increase in disease-free interval but not an increase in overall survival in treated patients.

Combination therapy with the chemotherapeutic drugs dacarbazine and cisplatin, along with immunotherapeutic agents such as IFN-α and IL-2, has yielded significantly higher response rates, variously reported in the 40% to 50% range. Most of these cases, however, were limited to metastases involving soft tissues, including lymph nodes and subcutaneous tissue or the lung. Very few responses have been recorded in patients with liver or other visceral metastases. Furthermore, there has been little prolongation of survival with the use of combination therapy.

Campoli M, Ferrone S: T-cell-based immunotherapy of melanoma: what have we learned and how can we improve? Expert Rev Vaccines 3:171–187, 2004.

Terando AM, Faries MB, Morton DL: Vaccine therapy for melanoma: current status and future directions, Vaccine 25(Suppl 2):B4–B16, 2007.

Campoli M, Ferrone S: Immunotherapy of malignant disease: the coming age of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. In De Vita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg S, editors: Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, New York, 2009, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 23:1–18.

Schadendorf D, Algarra SM, Bastholt L, et al: Immunotherapy of distant metastatic disease, Ann Oncol 20(Suppl 6):vi41–vi50, 2009.

Rosenberg SA, Dudley ME: Adoptive cell therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma, Curr Opin Immunol 21: 233–240, 2009.