LUMBAR SPINE

Published on 16/03/2015 by admin

Filed under Orthopaedics

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 0 (0 votes)

This article have been viewed 2845 times

CHAPTER EIGHT LUMBAR SPINE

INTRODUCTION

As many as 90% of patients with back pain have a mechanical reason for their pain. Mechanical low back pain may be defined as pain secondary to overuse of a normal anatomic structure or pain secondary to trauma or deformity of an anatomic structure. The age of a patient is helpful in determining the potential cause of back pain. In considering spondyloarthropathies, clinical characteristics help in differentiating the diseases belonging in this group (Table 8-3 and Table 8-4). The sex of the patient may also help select potential causes of low back pain. Certain disorders occur more often in men, whereas others are associated more commonly with women. Others occur equally in both sexes (Table 8-5).

TABLE 8-3 CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SPONDYLOARTHROPATHIES

HLA, Human leukocyte antigen.

Adapted From Kelley WN et al: Textbook of rheumatology, ed 5, Philadelphia, 1997, WB Saunders.

TABLE 8-4 DISEASES BELONGING TO THE SPONDYLOARTHROPATHIES

Adapted From Kelley WN et al: Textbook of rheumatology, ed 5, Philadelphia, 1997, WB Saunders.

TABLE 8-5 GENDER PREVALENCE IN LOW BACK PAIN

Male predominance
Female predominance

Data from Klippel JH, Dieppe PA: Rheumatology, vol 1-2, ed 2, London, 1998, Mosby.

Other than the common cold, back pain is the most prevalent human affliction. As stated earlier, most patients have a mechanical cause (muscle strain or annular tear) for their back pain and do not have an underlying, serious, systemic medical illness.

Even if treatment involves only a localized part of the lumbar spine, in each case, the lumbar spine has to be considered as a functional unit consisting of bones, ligaments, intervertebral discs, muscles, and all other soft tissues. Because of their central location, spinal elements represent the focal point for the equilibrium of the body. Because of the many connections and relations, spinal changes influence some organs directly, and the functional equilibrium of the spine depends on the efficient performance of other organs.

TABLE 8-2 LUMBAR SPINE CROSS-REFERENCE TABLE BY SYNDROME OR TISSUE

Cord tumor
Denervation
Dural adhesions
Femoral nerve
Fracture
Hamstring spasm Lewin standing test
Hip lesion
Intervertebral disc syndrome
Intervertebral foramen encroachment
L2–L3–L4
Lower extremity joints Quick test
Mechanical lower back
Meningitis Kernig/Brudzinski sign
Myofascitis
Sacroiliac lesion
Sciatica
Spinal neuropathy
Sprain
Subluxation

The spine contributes to many mutual relationships within the total body. With its equilibrium (statics), the spine exerts, influences, and receives forces (dynamics), all of which are interwoven with the far-reaching chain of motion (kinetics). In addition, the spine is able to exercise considerable influence on neighboring structures, as well as on remote organs. This influence is its action on nerves and blood vessels. To a considerable degree, this complicated system depends on the metabolism, the mineral metabolism of the bones, and the nutrition of the bradytrophic ligamentous and disc tissues. Improper function of the endocrine glands also affects the spine.

During fetal development, the spine may be exposed to many influences, such as drug-induced malformations, lack of oxygen, or radiation.

Occupational and daily-living stresses, as well as traumatic influences, may combine to have an unfavorable effect when coupled with the aging process, which has a marked effect on the disc apparatus and the bony substance. More resources for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal diseases are available today than previously.

Degeneration of posture during early years, lack of exercise, physical weakness, and degenerative changes in later life have taken on a serious social significance for the cultures of industrialized nations.

The spine is an intricate and interesting mechanical structure. The spine’s functions are mechanical, and it is well suited for serving its basic mechanical roles. The materials used to execute the design are appropriate for enhancing these functions. The spine must transfer loads from the trunk to the pelvis, must allow for physiologic motion, and must protect the spinal cord from damage. When a proper appreciation of normal anatomy and mechanics has been gained, the pathophysiologic features of the diseased or deformed spine become clear.

The lumbar spine is designed to withstand loading and to provide truncal mobility. The primary plane of motion is during flexionextension, although axial rotation at the L5 level is significant. This rotation in the lower lumbar spine is particularly important, considering that the annulus fails and tears with torsional forces. Coupling in the lumbar spine is the opposite of cervical and thoracic spine coupling. The spinous processes move toward the concavity of the curve in physiologic lateral flexion.

Optimal spinal mobility in relation to age is difficult to pin down. The only generalization that can be made is that spinal mobility is probably greatest during adolescence and early adulthood. This tendency is significant when planning treatment and in determining prognoses.

The anatomic structures of the lumbosacral spine receive specific types of sensory innervation that are associated with distinct qualities of pain (Table 8-6).

ESSENTIAL MOTION ASSESSMENT

Range-of-motion findings are most helpful in pinpointing a vertebral structure that may be compromised in the lumbar spine. Pain at an early point in the extension of the lumbar spine suggests an inflamed posterior joint or pars disease. Painful lumbar flexion in the early-to-middle range connotes a faulty disc mechanism or muscular stain. Because the terminal range of flexion causes the facet joint capsule to stretch, a pain response at this point may indicate a posterior joint sprain.

Patients with acute spasm or significant trauma often have multidirectional complaints and severe limitation of motion in all planes. Therefore, range-of-motion testing may be initially inconclusive as to the severity of the injury.

To assess the contribution made to flexion by the lumbar spine, the examiner should mark the spine at the lumbosacral junction and then 10 cm above and 5 cm below this point. On forward flexion, the distance between the two upper marks should increase by approximately 4 cm, the distance between the lower two remaining unaltered (Figs. 8-1 to 8-4).

ESSENTIAL MUSCLE FUNCTION ASSESSMENT

The erector spinae consist of a minor portion (the spinalis) and two major portions (the longissimus and iliocostalis). The spinalis connects spinous processes, and the longissimus and iliocostalis connect homologous portions of the costal and transverse elements of the lumbar, thoracic, and cervical vertebrae and skull.

Useful in screening is muscle testing of the legs, which measures strength on a 5-point scale for extension and flexion (knee), abduction and adduction (hip), and eversion and inversion, as well as dorsiflexion and plantar flexion (foot) (Table 8-7).

For patients in whom the objective findings do not match the subjective complaints, close observation helps identify the inconsistencies (Table 8-8). A finding of three or more of the five signs of the Waddell index is clinically significant. Isolated positive signs are ignored.

TABLE 8-8 NONORGANIC PHYSICAL SIGNS INDICATING ILLNESS BEHAVIOR

  Physical Disease/Normal Illness Behavior Abnormal Illness Behavior
Symptoms    
Pain Anatomic distribution Whole leg pain
    Tailbone pain
Numbness Dermatomal Whole leg numbness
Weakness Myotomal Whole leg giving way
Time pattern Varies with time and activity Never free of pain
Response to treatment Variable benefit Intolerance of treatments
    Emergency admissions to hospital
Signs    
Tenderness Anatomic distribution Superficial
    Widespread nonanatomic
Axial loading No lumbar pain Lumbar pain
Simulated rotation No lumbar pain Lumbar pain
Straight leg raising Limited on distraction Improves with distraction
Sensory Dermatomal Regional
Motor Myotomal Regional, jerky, giving way

From Demeter SL, Andersson GBJ, Smith GM: Disability evaluation, St Louis, 1996, Mosby.

The iliacus arises from the iliac fossa and joins the psoas under the inguinal ligament. The iliacus then crosses the hip joint capsule and inserts into the lesser trochanter of the femur. These muscles flex the lumbar spine and bend it toward the same side. The quadratus lumborum, which lies lateral to the vertebral column, arises from the posterior part of the iliac crest and iliolumbar ligament and inserts into the twelfth rib and the tips of the transverse processes of the upper four lumbar vertebrae. This muscle fixes the diaphragm during inspiration and bends the trunk toward the same side when it acts alone (Figs. 8-5 to 8-7).

ANTALGIA SIGN

CT, Computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Adapted from Brier SR: Primary care orthopedics, St Louis, 1999, Mosby.

A disc may protrude lateral to a nerve root, medial to a nerve root, under a nerve root, or central to the nerve root.

COX SIGN

Assessment for Prolapse of Intervertebral Disc Nucleus

Comment

Several maneuvers tighten the sciatic nerve and compress an inflamed nerve root against a herniated lumbar disc. With the straight-leg-raising tests, the L5 and S1 nerve roots move several millimeters at the level of the foramen. The L4 nerve root moves a smaller distance, and the proximal roots show little motion. The straight-leg-raising tests are most important and valuable for detecting lesions of the L5 and S1 nerve roots. Young patients with herniated discs have marked propensities for positive straight-leg-raising tests. Although the test itself is not pathognomonic, a negative test rules out the possibility of a herniated disc. After age 30, a negative straight-leg-raising test no longer precludes this diagnosis. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae complicate this further (Table 8-10).

TABLE 8-10 CASTELLVI CLASSIFICATION OF LUMBOSACRAL TRANSITIONAL VERTEBRA

ELY SIGN

ELY HEEL-TO-BUTTOCK TEST

Assessment for Lumbar Radicular or Femoral Nerve Inflammation

Comment

The size of the lumbar vertebral canal ranges from 12 to 20 mm in its AP dimension at the mid sagittal plane and 18 to 27 mm in its transverse diameter. Stenosis has been defined as a narrowing below the lowest value of the range of normal (Table 8-12).

TABLE 8-12 DIMENSIONS OF THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAL FORAMINA (VERTEBRAL CANAL)*

Dimension Size (Range)
Anteroposterior (in midsagittal plane) 12–20 mm
Transverse (interpedicular distance) 18–27 mm

‡ A typical vertebral foramen is rather triangular (trefoil) in shape. However, the upper lumbar vertebral foramina are more rounded than the lower lumbar foramina. L1 is the most rounded, and each succeeding lumbar vertebra becomes increasingly triangular, with L5 the most dramatically trefoil of all. From Dommisse GF, Louw JA: Anatomy of the lumbar spine. In Floman Y, editor: Disorders of the lumbar spine, Rockville, Md, and Tel Aviv, Israel, 1990, Aspen and Freund Publishing House.

* Dimensions below the lowest value indicate spinal (vertebral) canal stenosis.

Dimensions of lumbar vertebral foramina are usually smaller than those of the cervical region but larger than those of the thoracic region. From Cramer GD, Darby SA: Basic and clinical anatomy of the spine, spinal cord, and ANS, St Louis, 1995, Mosby.

HEEL/TOE WALK TEST

Assessment for L5 or S1 Nerve Root Motor Deficiency

Comment

Muscle weakness, atrophy, or the inability to perform functional testing maneuvers all suggest the presence of nerve root compression that is more significant than the alteration of sensation (Table 8-14).

When the leg is shaken, such as during the test for alternating motion rate, the foot will be unstable and flop about. The foot is less floppy with central disorders (upper motor neuron lesions) and may be fixed in plantar flexion. When dorsiflexion of the ankles and toes is weak, the toes of the spastic leg are dragged during walking. Before the examiner concludes that weakness of dorsiflexion is present, the foot should be passively dorsiflexed to be certain that previous weakness, now healed, did not permanently shorten the gastrocnemius. Not unusual is for patients with severe L5 radiculopathy, in whom significant motor axon loss has occurred, to have foot drop (Table 8-15).

TABLE 8-15 ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN L5 RADICULOPATHY AND PERONEAL NEUROPATHY

  L5 Radiculopathy Peroneal Neuropathy
Nerve Conduction Studies    
Peroneal CMAP, recording extensor digitorum brevis Normal or low amplitude Conduction block at fibular head, low amplitude, or both
Peroneal CMAP, recording tibialis anterior Normal or low amplitude Conduction block at fibular head, low amplitude, or both
Superficial peroneal SNAP Normal Low or absent; normal in deep peroneal or purely demyelinating lesions
Needle EMG    
Tibialis anterior Abnormal Abnormal
Extensor digitorum brevis Abnormal Abnormal
Extensor hallucis Abnormal Abnormal
Peroneus longus Abnormal Abnormal; normal in selective deep peroneal lesions
Tibialis posterior Abnormal Normal
Flexor digitorum longus Abnormal Normal
Gluteus medius May be normal Normal
Tensor fasciae latae May be normal Normal
Lumbar paraspinals May be normal Normal

CMAP, Compound muscle action potential; EMG, electromyography; SNAP, sensory nerve action potential.

From Katirji B: Electromyography in clinical practice: a case study approach, St Louis, 1998, Mosby.

HYPEREXTENSION TEST

Assessment for L3 and L4 Nerve Root Inflammation

ORTHOPEDIC GAMUT 8-12 MODIFIED WILTSE CLASSIFICATION OF LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS ETIOLOGY

KEMP TEST

Assessment for Intervertebral Nerve Root Encroachment, Muscular Strain, Ligamentous Sprain, or Pericapsular Inflammation

PROCEDURE

LASÈGUE SITTING TEST

Assessment for Sciatic Nerve Inflammation

PROCEDURE

LASÈGUE TEST

ALSO KNOWN AS LASÈGUE SIGN

Assessment for Sciatica Resulting from Lumbosacral or Sacroiliac Lesions, Lumbar Subluxation Syndrome, Intervertebral Disc Lesion, Spondylolisthesis, Dural Sleeve Adhesions, or Intervertebral Foramen Occlusion (Encroachment)

LEWIN SUPINE TEST

Assessment for Lumbar Arthritis, Lumbar Fibrosis, Spondylosis, Sacroiliac or Lumbosacral Arthrosis, or Sciatica

LINDNER SIGN

Assessment for Lumbar Nerve Root Irritation or Inflammation

MATCHSTICK TEST

Assessment for Denervation Hypersensitivity

Comment

Many cases of acute low back pain that are not correctly identified evolve into a chronic spinal problem with significant disability at the muscular level (Table 8-20). Patients with muscular dysfunction of the lumbar spine can have varying types of clinical findings and case histories.

TABLE 8-20 SITES OF LUMBOPELVIC SOFT-TISSUE SYNDROMES/MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINTS

Diagnosis Site of Complaint
Quadratus lumborum syndrome Gluteal region, anterior iliac spine, greater trochanter of femur
Gluteus maximus or medius syndrome Sacral and gluteal region, lateral hip
Gluteus minimus syndrome Lateral hip, thigh, and calf
Chronic lumbar strain (spinal erector muscles) Laterally to ribs, caudally toward lumbosacral junction
Piriformis syndrome Sacroiliac region; posterior hip, thigh, calf; possibly sole of foot

Adapted from Brier SR: Primary care orthopedics, St Louis, 1999, Mosby.

MENNELL SIGN

Assessment for Pathologic Involvement of the Sacroiliac Joint Structures

PROCEDURE

PRONE KNEE-BENDING TEST

Assessment for L2 or L3 Nerve Root Lesion, Femoral Nerve Inflammation, or Quadriceps Muscular Strain

SICARD SIGN

Assessment for Sciatic Radiculopathy

Comment

Once a fragment transgresses the peridural membrane, epidural fat and the epidural venous plexus, the nerve root itself presumably acts as an impediment to further posterior migration.

SPINAL PERCUSSION TEST

Assessment for Osseous or Soft-Tissue Injury in the Lumbar Spine

PROCEDURE

CLINICAL PEARL

As many authors have pointed out, the nerve roots have a narrow range of movement for stretching. Most authors also conclude that the nerve roots in normal conditions are not stretched by the straight-leg-raising test until 35 to 70 degrees of angulation have been reached. However, if the nerve exists with a space-occupying mass (protrusion of disc material) that deflects the nerve’s normal pathway, the amount of allowable stretch is already used up by the mass. In this case, the positive sign, pain radiating down the sciatic distribution, occurs at a much lower angulation. This pain has been misconstrued by many researchers to indicate the involvement of the sacroiliac joint instead of the sensitive finding that a nerve root compression syndrome exists. Sciatica that is in the leg and produced from 0 to 30 degrees is caused by nerve root compression. Sciatica that is in the leg and produced from 30 to 60 degrees is probably caused by sacroiliac joint disease. Sciatica that is in the leg and produced above 60 degrees is probably caused by lumbosacral disease.

A cardinal point is that most, if not all, ranges of movement given for the sciatic nerve roots are based on the absence of a space-occupying mass. The angles change dramatically in the presence of disease. This change is the basis of the Cox sign, which reveals the diseased or compressed nerve root, and Demianoff sign, which reveals the normal nerve root but diseased sacroiliac or lumbosacral musculature.

TURYN SIGN

Assessment for Sciatic Radiculopathy