CHAPTER 5 Long Head of the Biceps Tendon
Historically, the functional role of the long head of the biceps tendon has been controversial. Viewpoints have ranged from the biceps’ being a critical structural restraint to superior migration of the humeral head, to its being a vestigial structure that has little if any functional role in the shoulder. More recently, the long head of the biceps has been implicated as a source of pain in patients with rotator cuff tears and in those with continued pain after shoulder arthroplasty performed for a proximal humeral fracture.1,2
In our patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty, we have noted gross abnormalities of the long head of the biceps tendon in 61%. Table 5-1 details bicipital abnormalities observed at the time of shoulder arthroplasty by diagnosis.
Table 5-1 CONDITION OF THE LONG HEAD OF THE BICEPS TENDON IN CASES OF SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED AT TEXAS ORTHOPEDIC HOSPITAL FROM 2003 TO 2005
Handling of the long head of the biceps tendon during shoulder arthroplasty has ranged from systematic preservation to systematic tenotomy or tenodesis regardless of its condition. In a series of 688 shoulder arthroplasties performed for primary osteoarthritis, concomitant biceps tenodesis or tenotomy was shown to improve outcomes. In this series, 121 shoulders underwent biceps tenodesis or tenotomy at the time of shoulder arthroplasty, independent of the condition of the biceps. These patients demonstrated a significantly higher postoperative mean activity score, mean mobility score, mean total Constant score, mean active anterior elevation, and mean active external rotation and better subjective results than did patients not undergoing concomitant biceps surgery.3 Fewer radiolucencies were reported around the glenoid component in shoulders that had undergone biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. Importantly, the incidence of complications was not affected by cutting the long head of the biceps tendon.
