Liposuction and circumferential lower truncal dermatolipectomy

Published on 23/05/2015 by admin

Filed under Plastic Reconstructive Surgery

Last modified 22/04/2025

Print this page

rate 1 star rate 2 star rate 3 star rate 4 star rate 5 star
Your rating: none, Average: 2.9 (27 votes)

This article have been viewed 4393 times

Chapter 38 Liposuction and circumferential lower truncal dermatolipectomy

Introduction

The worldwide population of obese and morbidly obese individuals is growing faster than any other group. Consequently, we have a rapid increase in patients after weight loss, some of them through diet and exercise, and others who undergo a bariatric procedure with more or less irreversible gastrointestinal changes. Therefore, this new subfield of plastic surgery is gaining worldwide acceptance and there are many participating surgeons around the world. Following the establishment of modern body lift procedures by Ted Lockwood in the early 1990s15 and the progress in this surgical field, we nowadays benefit from different innovative approaches, which are all based on Lockwood’s philosophy. The main technical aspect, similar to modern face-lifting procedures, is the reconstruction of the superficial and deep connective tissue layers comparable to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) of the face. Nevertheless, it is essential to perform large-area tissue undermining and separation to allow a sufficient tissue mobilization and tightening of the affected areas with respect to an optimal result.

Since patients after bariatric weight loss can be more challenging candidates than nonbariatric patients, it should be mandatory for every post-obesity surgeon to have thorough knowledge of different post-bariatric procedures, including their side effects, and all available body contouring procedures, consequently being able to deal with their specific perils and pitfalls.

We carried out our first lower body lifts in 1999, consistently improving our standards and technique. During the following years we were able to detect and solve problems and complications, and consecutively implement refinements, which nowadays enable us to perform our circumferential lower truncal dermatolipectomy within 2.5 to 3.5 hours. Nevertheless, we should keep in mind that these surgical procedures are performed on formerly morbidly obese patients and particularly on postbariatric patients, who may present with malabsorption and nutritional deficiencies. Despite the fact that we deal with the largest body surface area, it is possible to perform these procedures with manageable risks when preoperative planning and operative performance are carried out meticulously and conscientiously. During our first years, we refused to carry out simultaneous liposuction in circumferential body contouring procedures, in order to avoid any risk of impaired tissue perfusion. Currently, adjuvant liposuction is widely accepted in tissue mobilizing procedures and can safely be included into lower circumferential contouring procedures; however, one must always be aware of its various limitations.

Preoperative Preparation

A precise physical examination and assessment of the medical history is mandatory in every patient. The examination of the lower body should include the upper and lower abdomen, the umbilical region, the midline region in standing and supine position, the flank and hip region with lateral thigh, the inner thigh, and additionally, the entire lower back region. For grading we recommend the Pittsburgh Rating Scale, published by Song et al.6

The ideal patient for circumferential reconstructive surgery meets the following criteria:

The first consultation should further include a thorough and detailed explanation of the entire procedure, preferably on PowerPoint® presentations. It is essential to demonstrate complications on images to visualize and emphasize possibilities such as wound separation and impaired scarring. The translation-test by Aly has proven to be worthwhile in clinical practice. The patient is instructed to grasp his tissue surplus at the height of his waist and pull the excess tissue firmly upwards. The visible skin lift and body contour improvement obtained in this way reliably forecasts the outcome of the thigh appearance after lower body lift operations. Optimal results can be achieved with a normal BMI < 25. With a higher preoperative BMI the patient must be informed about an exponentially limited postoperative result. The upper limit for massive weight loss surgery should not exceed a current BMI of 32.7

Further, we endeavor to enhance the patient’s understanding of impaired skin quality due to weight loss and bariatric surgery. In this context, we cite the latest article on this issue and inform every patient about secondary skin relaxation in this specific patient group. Therefore it is not uncommon to perform a secondary tightening procedure in particular cases.8

Markings

Initially, the boundaries of the patient’s preferred undergarment are marked in the standing position. The desired scar course is marked in red and double-checked by the patient. Dorsal markings are performed first. The posterior upper incision line runs about two to three finger breadths above the desired scar line and is marked in blue. The blue line, along its entire length, is then pulled caudally using the surgeon’s palm and is checked to make sure that it will reach the proposed red line of closure. In general, it should be at the lateral height of the umbilicus. The inferior proposed line of excision is estimated by strongly pinching the skin cranially, ensuring that approximately a quarter of the total resection height lies superior to the red scar line while the lower three quarters are inferior to it. The proposed inferior line of excision is an estimate that may need to be adjusted at the time of surgery. If avoidable, the anal cleft should not be elevated, since an elongation may result in patient dissatisfaction. It has been worthwhile to allow the upper incision line to run at a sharper angle into the anal cleft, in order to achieve an optical accentuation of the buttock form (Fig. 38.1).

Next, the anterior markings are performed based on the frontal red line previously marked (Fig. 38.2). We routinely instruct the patient to firmly and symmetrically pull up the entire abdominal tissue, while we initially mark the midline, a minimal distance of 6 cm from the vulvar commissure (or base of the penis), and next the lower incision line from the midline point laterally, where they are connected to the lower dorsal line. Often the resulting scar line is placed too far cranially due to a lower incision line marked in the abdominal skinfold. Consequently, the mons pubis, which is often sagged and slackened, is not lifted. In more severe cases the lower incision line can be extended caudally in an elliptical or triangle shape into the mons pubis region for an effective local skin tightening. Nevertheless, it is essential to leave a distance of 6 cm to the upper vulvar commissure (or base of the penis) (Fig. 38.3). The upper incision line is then continued from the lateral aspect of the dorsal upper line medially to the height of the umbilicus. In cases of distinct tissue surplus in the upper abdomen we routinely inform the patient about the option of a fleur-de-lis incision pattern during the first consultation. If the patient agrees to this additional scar line, we draw the midline cranially to the xiphoid. The vertical incision line is then evaluated by pinching and marked in an elliptical shape, starting two finger breadths below the xiphoid. This is mandatory to avoid a further cranial scar ending. Also, it is advisable to mark the vertical incision lines in standing position, since the tissue tends to drop laterally and backwards in supine position. The upper horizontal incision line is then marked approximately one finger breadth below the height of the umbilicus.

Importantly, dorsal vector lines are marked to allow a mediocranial rotation of the gluteal and thigh region and a consequent sculpturing of the waist (Figs 38.3 and 38.4). A final check of the markings should be performed in the patient’s supine and prone positions.

For additional liposculpturing of the flank, back or lateral thigh regions, the markings are made in the typical manner. We advise refraining from excessive liposuction in the undermined gluteal area, since any additional impairment of microcirculation in this area may result in skin necrosis. Patients after massive weight loss frequently present with significant adipose tissue redundancy in the area of the circumferential thighs, we routinely perform widespread tissue reduction by vibration-assisted liposuction in this area during the initial circumferential lower truncal dermatolipectomy.9

Surgical Technique

We routinely perform the operation with two teams of one surgeon and one medical assistant. The leading surgeon performs all the markings and is responsible for the entire performance. Preparation, dissection, and wound closure are performed simultaneously on each side of the patient’s body. After endotracheal intubation and the installation of a urinary catheter the patient is turned to the prone position on a padded operating table. Next, the patient is scrubbed and covered with sterile drapes, followed by a wide-area infiltration of tumescent solution (1 liter of Ringer solution including 1 ampule of Suprarenin) between the superior and inferior line, which is performed until a satisfactory tissue turgor is achieved. In cases of additional flank, back, or thigh contouring, additional tumescent infiltration is performed.

Dorsal Preparation

The initial skin incision (utilizing the cold blade or alternatively the Colorado® Microdissection needle) is made along the superior marking line and is carried out down to the level of the underlying superficial fascia, which is exposed using the Colorado® Microdissection needle or alternatively the Harmonic™ ultrasound scalpel, both of which easily separate the superficial lamellar from the subfascial lobular fat. Next, the dissection is continued inferiorly just above the robust white superficial fascia. The dissection level above the superficial fascia differs considerably from the original technique by Lockwood, who dissected subfascially. The preservation of fascia to the deep gluteal fat as the “gluteal SMAS” is conceptionally similar to the “facial SMAS” used in face-lifts. The superficial fascia is dissected at the height of the inferior resection line, before flap mobilization is continued caudally. Further, this allows a reconstruction of superficial fascia upon wound closure. Lateral gluteal adhesions are released caudally up to the gluteal fold height, before dissection is continued to the lateral thigh, where the preparation level is above the aponeurosis of the tensor fascia lata muscle. Further distal mobilization of the lateral thigh can be carried out bluntly using the Lockwood underminer. With completion of dissection, the waist and gluteal fatty tissue is widely mobilized and covered with robust superficial fascia. This is particularly suited for autologous gluteal augmentations, since patients after massive weight loss frequently suffer from flattened buttocks. For this purpose, two to three 1×0 Ethibond threads (Ethicon, USA) are sutured from lateral to medial, grasping the stable fascia and consequently displacing the gluteal fatty tissue to the middle of the buttock. For cranial repositioning, three to four 1×0 Ethibond threads (Ethicon, USA) are sutured from caudal to cranial at the medial aspect of the buttocks. By reconstruction and tightening of the gluteal adipose tissue, the gluteal flaps are lifted cranially with a consequent final skin closure under less tension. Further, this maneuver is able to improve the shape of the waist (Fig. 38.5).

The detachment in the zones of adherence combined with an extended mobilization allow an enormous tightening of the skin. The stage of resection should always be supervised by the “leading” surgeon in terms of symmetrical resection. We advise to utilize bullet forceps for determination of the amount of resection. The marked vector lines (Fig. 38.4) are incised from medial to lateral and adjusted for maximum tension. The redundant medial, central and lateral gluteal flaps arising in this way are measured precisely in tensed condition for symmetrical resection, which is subsequently carried out between the clamps (Figs 38.6 and 38.7).

Reconstruction of the superficial fascia system (SFS) is then performed with PDS 2×0 (Ethicon, USA). The SFS is extremely stable, allowing avoidance of any suturing of fat tissue in terms of consequent fat necrosis. After readapting the SFS, wound closure is performed in layers with resorbable suture material (see below). Two suction drains are placed in each gluteal/back and lateral thigh region and buried in the wound for sterile turning of the patient.

Before patients are turned into the supine position we perform a temporary closure of the lateral skin surplus utilizing a stapler and occlusive Opsite® foil.9

Anterior Preparation

Standard Technique

The inferior incision is checked and re-marked before the patient is scrubbed, adjusting the initial inferior line to the laterally ending gluteal incision line. Infiltration of tumescent solution is then performed in the marked areas. Vibration-assisted liposuction, however, is performed at the time of wound closure, again avoiding excessive liposuction in the areas to be undermined.

With all techniques the dissection level is performed above Scarpa’s fascia (Figs 38.838.10), entailing a number of key advantages: long-lasting swellings can be prevented because the underlying lymphatic vessels are preserved, and the stretching of the SFS craniomedially provides an additional “inner traction” on the deep penetrating fascia system of the thigh. The SFS may then be fixated with 1/0 Ethibond sutures (Ethicon, USA) to the anterior rectus fascia (Fig. 38.11). Approximately three finger breadths below the umbilicus, Scarpa’s fascia is dissected and further mobilization of the abdominal flap is performed cranially on the anterior rectus fascia (Fig. 38.12). The central supraumbilical adhesion zone is sharply dissected between both rectus muscles, preserving the laterally incoming perforator vessels (Fig. 38.13).

Rectus diastasis and/or abdominal fascial laxity are corrected by vertical anterior rectus fascia plication (Figs 38.13 and 38.14). In simple cases, midline plication is sufficient; in more pronounced cases of fascial laxity additional oblique infraumbilical plications may be indicated. Lateral extended release of the abdominal flap may be necessary to prevent tissue bulging in the midline. Since the umbilicus is often prolonged in patients after massive weight loss, we shorten the entire umbilical stalk with a remaining 2–3 cm deep umbilical tunnel. The umbilicus base is now fixated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock to the anterior rectus fascia. The new position of the umbilicus is marked on the abdominal flap and a small distally based triangular or U-shaped pedicular flap is incised, followed by an extensive periumbilical fat removal, and continued cranially in the midline for accentuation of a “Champagne groove”. Temporary wound closure is performed with bullet forceps, followed by reconstruction of the SFS with PDS® 2×0 (Ethicon, USA). A multilayer wound closure with 2-0 and 3-0 Monocryl® (Ethicon, USA) follows prior to intracuticular suturing. Because of the wound length, 2-0 Monocryl® (Ethicon, USA) is advisable (Fig. 38.15). Finally, Steri-strips are applied as described later. Alternatively, wound closure at the subdermal level may be performed with a single resorbable barbed suture (PDO 3-0, Quill®) in running manner. Skin closure may then be performed with an intracuticular monofil or barbed suture and alternatively with a two component skin closure system (refer to section Operation Time).

image

FIG. 38.15 Skin closure in an everting manner with postoperative progression (upper) and schematic demonstration of the three-level suturing (lower).

(From DF Richter & A Stoff, Chapter 25, Abdominoplasty procedures. In Neligan, PC, Plastic Surgery, Third edition, Volume Two, Aesthetic, Copyright Elsevier 2013.)

Fleur-de-lis Technique

Initial preparation and dissection of a Fleur-de-lis lipectomy is equal to a standard abdominal lipectomy. On completion of the abdominal flap mobilization we check the horizontal resection utilizing bullet forceps, followed by an incision and resection of the midline tissue excess. After meticulous hemostasis the temporary vertical wound closure is performed, following any fascial tightening. Subsequently, the vertical tissue excess is checked in regard to the horizontal superior incision line prior to its resection. The umbilical insertion is performed after closure of the entire vertical wound. We routinely mark the midline of the future umbilical position and bilaterally excise a small triangle or semicircle, depending on the preferred incision pattern of the umbilical stalk. Umbilical reinsertion is then performed with 5-0 Prolene™ (Ethicon, USA), considering a small vertical umbilical diameter. We advise performing excisions at the umbilical level conservatively, since our first cases presented with postoperative increased umbilical diameters.

In patients with extreme weight loss (>120 kg) and consecutive skin redundancy the abdominal tissue tightening mostly requires fleur-de-lis resections, which significantly reduce the lower abdominal circumference. In the thigh area these patients additionally present extensive circumferential tissue redundancies, which we prefer to remove by a medial scar approach, beginning from the lower abdominal scar at the mons pubis and descending caudally to the medial thigh region. In this regard, we recommend performing the closure of the abdominal region while shifting the lower lateral and anterior thigh tissue medially. This allows a circumferential tightening of the entire thigh circumference. Immediately and in the first weeks postoperatively, patients have to deal with a significant skin surplus at the lateral mons pubis region, which will be eliminated by the following inner thighplasty. Taking this maneuver into account, this modification allows an optimal tightening of the entire thigh simply by two procedures. Representative case studies are shown in Figs 38.1638.27.

Optimizing Outcomes

We evaluated our results retrospectively from the years 1999 to 2010 and collected data from more than 1100 lift operations. The list of the main problems and solutions is as follows:

Wound Healing Disorders

Circumferential lower truncal dermatolipectomies include extended tissue mobilization with a corresponding impairment of tissue perfusion. Therefore, it is essential to have precise knowledge of the vascular anatomy and the restrictions implicated by this procedure.

For this reason we advise respecting the following instructions:

Wound healing problems represent the most frequent complication after circumferential operations. Erroneous postoperative repositioning or excessive mobilization may cause wound dehiscences. Procedure-related staff training is therefore mandatory for optimal perioperative patient care.

Suture granulomas due to the large number of resorbable sutures occur frequently and may cause local infections with wound openings. In patients with bariatric surgery we endeavor to monitor proteins, vitamin C, zinc, blood glucose, as well as hemoglobin levels.10,16

Seroma

Because of the large area of the wounds, accumulations of wound fluid (seromas) may cause postoperative problems. Particularly at the lateral thigh, seroma may occur down to the knee region due to gravity. Seroma formation cannot be prevented with any degree of certainty.1719 Suction-assisted drains in the area of the lateral outer thigh are left until drainage is less than 30 ml within 24 hours. Progressive tension sutures are helpful tools for the reduction of dead space and may limit accumulation of fluids.20 The potential of the ultrasonically activated Harmonic™ scalpel for reducing seroma formation in circumferential body lift procedures has been demonstrated in studies.21

Buttock and Waist Formation

After massive weight loss patients often present with a flattened buttock. Circumferential lower body contouring procedures remove redundant skin and adipose tissue, which may prohibit any contour improvement in the gluteal region. For this reason, it is of huge importance in certain cases to restore gluteal adipose tissue for gluteal enhancement with autologous tissue transpositioning (transposition-gluteoplasty) during circumferential lower truncal dermatolipectomy. This maneuver enables an enhancement of gluteal projection, gluteal shape and waist formation22 (Figs 38.2838.36).

Postoperative Care

The patient is monitored for the initial 24 hours postoperatively on an intensive or intermediate care unit. In order to ensure an optimal tissue perfusion and appropriate microcirculation, 2500 ml of Ringer solution is provided in the initial 48 hours postoperatively. Dressings during the initial 48 hours postoperatively include compression girdles surrounding an adult patient diaper. Furthermore, laboratory checks for electrolytes and hemoglobin are performed multiply during the initial 48 hours. Patients are positioned in the beach-chair position, on an air mattress with electronically adjustable positions, if available. Thrombosis prophylaxis is administered using low molecular weight heparins and compression stockings. Patients are instructed to move their feet consistently without crossing legs. All patients receive pain treatment within the initial 48 hours postoperatively, utilizing an individualized patient-controlled analgesia pump. Patients are mobilized on the first postoperative day and instructed to obtain deep-breathing exercises to prevent pneumonia. Drains are removed when drainage is less than 30 ml per 24 hours. The urinary catheter is removed after 2–3 days postoperatively for better mobilization.

The average duration of hospitalization is 6 days. Before discharge we individually adapt a compression garment, which has to be stringently worn for at least 8 weeks postoperatively. The immediate postoperative compression therapy is intended to reduce shearing forces for adhesion support of different tissue layers. In this context, drains are left for a minimum of 4 days postoperatively for negative intracavitary pressure.

For reduction of superficial wound tension, we intraoperatively apply transverse vectored Steri-Strips™ for the initial 3 weeks postoperatively. Any nonresorbable suture or wound closure material is removed at the latest 3 weeks postoperatively. For at least 3 months postoperatively we recommend our patients to cover the scars entirely with silicone sheets for improved scar formation.

Complications and Their Management

Complications in body contouring procedures have to be differentiated into minor and major types. Since the procedure results in large wound areas and wounds are closed on a length of 100 up to 200 cm, minor complications cannot be precluded.

Since wounds are closed with deep and superficial subcutaneous sutures, we commonly observe minor complications such as local wound reactions on resorbable suture material. Due to this, we emphasize a reduction in the total number of knots, and an everted skin closure with attention to maximal suture shortening and deep positioning. Further, we currently utilize barbed sutures in a running subdermal manner, which allows us to do away with superficial subdermal single knots. Primary treatment of local wound healing disorders is conservative wound management. In persistent cases we suggest a local excision with secondary closure, to be performed under local anesthesia. In rare cases, patients suffer from allergy to suture ingredients, which has to be excluded in cases of multiple wound healing disorders in the same patient.

Other minor complications such as local wound separation, asymmetry of the scars or umbilicus can be corrected by a secondary revision. Wound separation is mainly caused by local infection, impaired perfusion in smokers, seroma formation, or increased wound tension, therefore is more likely to occur in the gluteal wound area.

Fortunately, in spite of the fact that we treat formerly morbidly obese patients, the risk of life-threatening major complications such as DVT followed by pulmonary embolism, severe infection, or bleeding, is rare.

In cases of major postoperative bleeding, we recommend an early revision, since the wound cavity may gather a large and life-threatening blood volume and any hematoma consequently leads to a seroma formation. For this reason, we emphasize the use of donated blood transfusions for cases with serious blood loss. To prevent postoperative bleeding the anesthesiologist should induce a controlled hypertension before wound closure and perform the patient’s awakening from anesthesia as calmly as possible.

Severe infections are extremely uncommon, prophylaxis is maintained by single-shot antibiotics, and therapy should be performed adequately by early aggressive wound debridement. The installation of an infusion–aspiration drainage may be beneficial.

Of higher clinical relevance is the occurrence of seroma formation and consequent complications. This includes secondary wound healing and wound separation. In cases of simultaneous liposuction of the abdominal, flank, thigh or gluteal region we observe a prolonged drainage time and increased risk of seroma formation.

For prevention and risk minimization of seromas we recommend the following:

We recommend weekly wound inspections per manual and ultrasonic examination within the first 4 weeks postoperatively. The sooner a seroma is detected, the earlier it can be evacuated. If patients are inadequately guided during the postoperative phase, they might present with an unexpected wound separations with deflation of an undetected seroma. Once a seroma has been detected it should be evacuated under sterile conditions and checked at least twice a week. For persisting seroma we recommend the intracavitary injection of 200 mg doxycycline.9

Larger skin necrosis is an extremely rare complication and should be primarily treated by conservative debridement followed by wet wound care. In cases of smaller skin necrosis we recommend an early excision and secondary closure, if wound tension allows a complete closure. Patients with extensive liposuction in the lower trunk regions prior to the circumferential procedure have an increased risk for skin necrosis. In these cases we advise minimizing tissue undermining and ensuring reduced tension during wound closure.

References

1 Lockwood TE. Superficial fascial system (SFS) of the trunk and extremities: a new concept. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6):1009–1018.

2 Lockwood TE. Transverse flank-thigh-buttock lift with superficial fascial suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6):1019–1027.

3 Lockwood TE. Lower body lift with superficial fascial system suspension. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(6):1112–2112. Nov

4 Lockwood TE. The role of excisional lifting in body contour surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 1996;23(4):695–712.

5 Lockwood TE. Maximizing aesthetics in lateral-tension abdominoplasty and body lifts. Clin Plast Surg. 2004;31(4):523–537.

6 Song AY, Jean RD, Hurwitz DJ, et al. A classification of contour deformities after bariatric weight loss: the Pittsburgh Rating Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;116(5):1535–1544.

7 Aly AS. Body Contouring after Massive Weight Loss. St.Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2006.

8 Orpheu SC, Coltro PS, Scopel GP, et al. Collagen and elastic content of abdominal skin after surgical weight loss. Obes Surg. 2010;20(4):480–486.

9 Richter DF, Stoff A, Velasco FJ, et al. Circumferential lower truncal dermato-lipectomy. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35(1):53–71.

10 Rubin JP, Nguyen V, Schwentker A. Perioperative management of the post-gastric-bypass patient presenting for body contour surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2004;31(4):601–610. vi. Review

11 Richter DF, Stoff A. Lower body contouring procedures. Chirurg. 2011;82(9):797–800. 802–806, [German]

12 Richter DF, Stoff A, Blondeel PN, et al. A comparison of a new skin closure device and intradermal sutures in the closure of full thickness surgical incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg, in press.

13 Huger WE, Jr. The anatomic rationale for abdominal lipectomy. Am Surg. 1979;45(9):612–617.

14 Hunstad JP, Repta R. Atlas of Abdominoplasty. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.

15 Richter DF, Stoff A, Uckunkaya E, et al. Perils and pitfalls in lower body lifts. Int J Adipose Tissue. 2007;1(1):12–16.

16 Agha-Mohammadi S, Hurwitz DJ. Enhanced recovery after body-contouring surgery: reducing surgical complication rates by optimizing nutrition. Aesth Plast Surg. 2010;34(5):617–625.

17 Aly AS, Cram AE, Chao M, et al. Belt lipectomy for circumferential truncal excess: The University of Iowa experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:398.

18 Kenkel JM. Body contouring surgery after massive weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;Suppl 117:1–86.

19 Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Conrad MH, et al. Simplifying circumferential body contouring: the central body lift evolution. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(2):525–535. discussion 536–538

20 Baroudi R, Moraes M. Philosophy, technical principles, selection, and indications in body contouring surgery. Aesth Plast Surg. 1991;15:1–18.

21 Stoff A, Reichenberger M, Richter DF. Comparing the ultrasonically-activated scalpel (HarmonicTM) versus high-frequency electrocautery on postoperative serous drainage in massive-weight-loss surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(4):1092–1093.

22 Richter DF, Stoff A. Autoaugmentation of the buttocks during circumferential body lift without flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. in preparation.