Lesions of The Stomach
Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis
Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is one of the most common surgical conditions of the newborn.1–9 It occurs at a rate of 1 to 4 per 1,000 live births in Caucasian infants, but is seen less often in non-Caucasian children.1–4 Males are affected more often with a 4 : 1 male-to-female ratio. Risk factors for HPS include family history, gender, younger maternal age, being a first-born infant, and maternal feeding patterns.4,9,10 Premature infants are diagnosed with HPS later than term or post-term infants.4
Etiology
The cause of HPS is unknown, but genetic and environmental factors appear to play a large role in the pathophysiology. Circumstantial evidence for a genetic predisposition includes race discrepancies, the increased frequency in males, and the birth order (first-born infants with a positive family history). Environmental factors associated with HPS include the method of feeding (breast vs formula), seasonal variability, exposure to erythromycin, and transpyloric feeding in premature infants.5–7 Additionally, there has been interest in several gastrointestinal peptides or growth factors that may facilitate pyloric hypertrophy. Some of these include excessive substance P, decreased neurotrophins, deficient nitric oxide synthase, and gastrin hypersecretion.8,9 Thus, the etiology of HPS is likely multifactorial with environmental influences.
Diagnosis
The classic presentation of HPS is nonbilious, projectile vomiting in a full-term neonate who is between 2 and 8 weeks old. Initially, the emesis is infrequent and may appear to be gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, over a short period of time, the emesis occurs with every feeding and becomes forceful (i.e., projectile). The contents of the emesis are usually the recent feedings, but signs of gastritis are not uncommon (‘coffee-ground’ emesis). On physical examination, the neonate usually appears well if the diagnosis is made early. However, depending on the duration of symptoms and degree of dehydration, the neonate may be gaunt and somnolent. Visible peristaltic waves may be present in the mid to left upper abdomen. The pylorus may be palpable in 72–89% of patients.11,12 To palpate the hypertrophied pylorus, the baby must be relaxed. Techniques for relaxing the infant include bending the knees and flexing the hips, and using a pacifier with sugar water. These techniques should be attempted after the stomach has been decompressed with a 10 French to 12 French orogastric tube. After palpating the liver edge, the examiner’s fingertips should slide underneath the liver in the midline. Slowly, the fingers are pulled back and down, trying to trap the ‘olive.’ Palpating the hypertrophied pylorus requires patience and an optimal examination setting. If palpated, no further studies are needed. If the pylorus cannot be palpated, ultrasound (US) should be performed.
Ultrasound has become the standard technique for diagnosing HPS and has supplanted the physical examination at most institutions. The diagnostic criteria for pyloric stenosis is a muscle thickness greater than or equal to 4 mm and a pyloric channel length greater than or equal to 16 mm (Fig. 29-1).12 A thickness of more than 3 mm is considered positive if the neonate is younger than 30 days of age.13 The study is dependent on the expertise of the ultrasound technician and radiologist.
FIGURE 29-1 Ultrasonography has become the standard imaging study for diagnosing pyloric stenosis and has supplanted physical examination at most institutions. The (A) transverse and (B) longitudinal views of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis are seen here. Muscle thickness greater than or equal to 4 mm on the transverse view or a length greater than or equal to 16 mm on the longitudinal view is diagnostic of pyloric stenosis. On this study, the pyloric wall thickness was 5 mm and the length (arrows) was 20 mm.
There are reports of non-radiologists performing ultrasound for HPS, which would obviously reduce the need for the ultrasound technician.14,15 If the ultrasound findings are equivocal, then an upper gastrointestinal series can be helpful in confirming the diagnosis (Fig. 29-2).
FIGURE 29-2 At some hospitals outside of urban centers, ultrasound technicians and radiologists proficient in performing an ultrasound study for pyloric stenosis are not available. Also, in some instances, an ultrasound study can be equivocal. An upper gastrointestinal series can be helpful in making the diagnosis of pyloric stenosis or confirming an equivocal ultrasound study. In this upper gastrointestinal study, note the ‘string sign’ indicating a markedly diminished pyloric channel (arrow) and subsequent gastric outlet obstruction. It is important to evacuate the contrast material after this study to reduce the risk of aspiration and pulmonary complications.
Treatment
The mainstay of therapy is typically resuscitation followed by pyloromyotomy. There are reports of medical treatment with atropine and pyloric dilation, but these treatments require long periods of therapy and are often not effective.16–20
The Open Approach
Several incisions have been described for the open approach. The typical right upper quadrant transverse incision seems to be used most commonly (Fig. 29-3). An alternate more cosmetically pleasing incision involves an omega-shaped incision around the superior portion of the umbilicus followed by incising the linea alba cephalad. With either incision, the pylorus is exteriorized through the incision. A longitudinal serosal incision is made in the pylorus approximately 2 mm proximal to the junction of the duodenum and is carried onto the anterior gastric wall for approximately 5 mm. Blunt dissection is used to initially divide the firm pyloric fibers. This can be performed using the handle of a scalpel. Once a good edge of fibers has been developed, a pyloric spreader or hemostat can be used to spread the fibers until the pyloric submucosal layer is seen. The pyloromyotomy is then completed by ensuring that all fibers are divided throughout the entire length of the pyloromyotomy. This is confirmed by visualizing the circular muscle of the stomach proximally as well as a slight protrusion of the submucosa. The most common point of mucosal entry is at the distal part of the incision at the duodenal–pyloric junction. Therefore, care must be exercised when dividing the fibers in this region. The pyloromyotomy can be evaluated for completeness by rocking the superior and inferior edges of the myotomy back and forth to ensure independent movement. The mucosal integrity can be checked by instilling air through the previously placed suction catheter. If there are no leaks, the air should be suctioned. Minor bleeding is common and should be ignored because it will cease after the venous congestion is reduced when the pylorus is returned to the abdominal cavity. The abdominal incision is then closed in layers.
The Laparoscopic Operation
Neonatal laparoscopy has grown in popularity with the refinement in technique and smaller instruments. The first reported laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in the English language was in 1991 (the authors had reported the first case in the French literature in 1990).21 Since then, this procedure has been accepted by most pediatric surgeons. Critics of this approach argue that laparoscopic pyloromyotomy exposes the patient to undue risks compared with the open technique. However, recent randomized prospective trials have not shown any difference in complication rates.22,23 Operative times can vary depending on the experience of the surgeon. The minimally invasive approach for pyloromyotomy is similar to laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of acceptance and has become the standard technique for pyloromyotomy in many centers.
Local anesthesia is instilled at all incisions. An atraumatic bowel grasper is inserted through the patient’s right incision, and a pylorotome or spatula cautery tip is introduced through the patient’s left incision (Fig. 29-4). The duodenum is grasped firmly just distal to the pylorus, and the pylorus is maneuvered into view. Occasionally, a transabdominal stay suture wrapping around the falciform ligament is helpful to elevate the liver away from the pylorus. A longitudinal pyloromyotomy is then made with the knife or cautery in a similar manner as the open technique (Fig. 29-5). Initially, a retractable arthrotomy knife was used; however, it is no longer available in the USA. Thus, most USA pediatric surgeons now use an unguarded arthrotomy knife or the cautery. Once the seromuscular layer is incised, a laparoscopic pyloric spreader or a box-type grasper is inserted to perform the myotomy. Completeness of the myotomy and mucosal integrity are checked in a similar manner as the open technique. Omentum can be placed over the myotomy to help with hemostasis. The pneumoperitoneum is evacuated after the instruments are removed. The umbilicus is closed with absorbable suture, and the stab incisions are closed with skin adhesive (see Fig. 29-4B).
FIGURE 29-4 Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy has become a common approach for pyloric stenosis in infants. In the USA, the sheathed arthrotomy knife is no longer available. Therefore, other techniques are now utilized. (A) The atraumatic grasper that is holding the duodenum is seen on the patient’s right (solid arrow). In the patient’s left upper abdomen, a spatula tipped cautery (dotted arrow) has been introduced to incise the serosa of the stomach. The 5 mm cannula has been placed in the umbilicus through which an angled telescope is introduced for visualization. (B) The stab incisions have been closed with steri-strips.
FIGURE 29-5 These intraoperative photographs depict a laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. (A) The spatula tipped cautery is being used to incise the serosa and outer muscular layer of the hypertrophied pylorus. (B) The tip of the cautery is introduced into the hypertrophied muscle and twisted to break up the muscle fibers and create a space for insertion of the pyloric spreader. (C) The pyloric spreader is introduced into the muscle and gently opened to split the hypertrophied muscle fibers. The submucosa is visualized through the myotomy. (D) Air is introduced into the stomach to assess the integrity of the mucosa.
Postoperative Care
Postoperative care is similar for both operative approaches, assuming the mucosal integrity of the stomach is intact. Complicated feeding regimens have been advocated in the past. However, more recent studies support the use of ad libitum feedings in the early postoperative period. This results in a faster time to full feeding and earlier discharge.24,25